Clinical Cancer Research Holland
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Kuilenburg, A. B. P.
Right arrow Articles by van Gennip, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Kuilenburg, A. B. P.
Right arrow Articles by van Gennip, A. H.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 6, 4705-4712, December 2000
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research


Clinical Trials

Clinical Implications of Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase (DPD) Deficiency in Patients with Severe 5-Fluorouracil-associated Toxicity: Identification of New Mutations in the DPD Gene

André B. P. van Kuilenburg1, Janet Haasjes, Dick J. Richel, Lida Zoetekouw, Henk Van Lenthe, Ronney A. De Abreu, Jan G. Maring, Peter Vreken and Albert H. van Gennip

Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Emma Children’s Hospital and Department of Clinical Chemistry, 1100 DE Amsterdam [A. B. P. v. K., J. H., D. J. R., L. Z., H. V. L., P. V., A. H. v. G.]; University Hospital St. Radboud, Department of Pediatrics, 6500 HB Nijmegen [R. A. D. A.]; and Hospital Meppel-Hoogeveen, 7940 AM Meppel [J. G. M.], the Netherlands


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is the initial and rate-limiting enzyme in the catabolism of 5-fluorouracil (5FU), and it is suggested that patients with a partial deficiency of this enzyme are at risk for developing a severe 5FU-associated toxicity. To evaluate the importance of this specific type of inborn error of pyrimidine metabolism in the etiology of 5FU toxicity, an analysis of the DPD activity, the DPD gene, and the clinical presentation of patients suffering from severe toxicity after the administration of 5FU was performed. Our study demonstrated that in 59% of the cases, a decreased DPD activity could be detected in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. It was observed that 55% of patients with a decreased DPD activity suffered from grade IV neutropenia compared with 13% of patients with a normal DPD activity (P = 0.01). Furthermore, the onset of toxicity occurred, on average, twice as fast in patients with low DPD activity as compared with patients with a normal DPD activity (10.0 ± 7.6 versus 19.1 ± 15.3 days; P < 0.05). Analysis of the DPD gene of 14 patients with a reduced DPD activity revealed the presence of mutations in 11 of 14 patients, with the splice site mutation IVS14+1G->A being the most abundant one (6 of 14 patients; 43%). Two novel missense mutations 496A->G (M166V) and 2846A->T (D949V) were detected in exon 6 and exon 22, respectively. Our results demonstrated that at least 57% (8 of 14) of the patients with a reduced DPD activity have a molecular basis for their deficient phenotype.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
5FU2 remains one of the most frequently prescribed chemotherapeutic drugs for the treatment of cancers of the gastrointestinal tract, the breast, and the head and neck. It has been shown that a long-term continuous i.v. infusion of 5FU is superior to bolus injections of 5FU in terms of response rate, although only a small increase in median survival was observed (1) . In addition, a relationship between the 5FU dose intensity and the therapeutic response, as well as toxicity, has been noted (2 , 3) . To exert its cytotoxicity, 5FU must first be metabolized to the nucleotide level. Although the cytotoxic effects of 5FU are probably mediated directly via the anabolic pathways, the catabolic route plays a significant role because >80% of the administered 5FU is catabolized by DPD (4) . In line with this phenomenon is the recent finding that tumors expressing low levels of DPD mRNA and DPD activity show a significantly better response to 5FU than those tumors with a high mRNA level and DPD activity (5 , 6) . Most importantly, a low intratumoral expression level of the DPD gene appears to be associated with a much longer survival period for patients (6) .

Because 5FU has a relatively narrow therapeutic index, toxicity increases as the dose is increased, resulting in escalated plasma levels of the drug (2 , 3) . A correlation has been observed between the pretreatment activity of DPD in PBM cells and the systemic clearance of 5FU in cancer patients (7) . In this light, a pharmacogenetic disorder has recently been described concerning cancer patients with a complete or partial deficiency of DPD suffering from a severe or even life-threatening toxicity after the administration of 5FU. It was shown that a number of these patients were genotypically heterozygous for a mutant DPD allele (8, 9, 10, 11) . On the basis of a population analysis of the DPD activity, the frequency of heterozygotes has been estimated to be as high as 3% (7) . Such patients might be at risk of developing severe toxicity after the administration of 5FU.

Thus far, 17 variant DPD alleles have been identified in pediatric patients suffering from a complete or nearly complete deficiency or in tumor patients with a decreased DPD activity (11, 12, 13, 14) . Recently, Collie-Duguid et al. (11) suggested that the known variant DPYD alleles do not entirely explain the polymorphic DPD activity and toxic response to 5FU. A serious drawback of their study, however, is the fact that only 10 of the 23 exons of the DPD gene were sequenced and investigated for the presence of mutations. Thus, no sound evidence has yet been provided as to whether patients with a low DPD activity have a molecular basis for their reduced activity.

Despite the pivotal role DPD plays in the metabolism of 5FU, only a limited number of studies have been reported describing either the toxicity encountered in patients with a low DPD activity or the partial analysis of the DPD gene for the presence of a mutated DPD allele (11 , 15) . To date, no studies have been reported describing both the toxicity and the analysis at the entire DPD gene for the presence of mutations. Thus, to evaluate the importance of this specific type of inborn error of pyrimidine metabolism in the etiology of 5FU toxicity, we performed an analysis of the DPD activity, the entire DPD gene, and the clinical presentation of patients suffering from severe toxicity after the administration of 5FU. Our study demonstrates that in 59% of the cases, a decreased DPD activity might be responsible for the observed toxicity, with grade IV granulocytopenia being the most prevalent type of toxicity in these patients. Furthermore, a high incidence of mutations in the DPD gene was found, with the splice site mutation IVS14+1G->A being the most abundant one. Our results demonstrate that at least 57% (8 of 14 patients) of the patients with a reduced DPD activity have a molecular basis for their deficient phenotype.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Chemicals.
[4-14C]thymine (1.85–2.22 GBq/mmol) was obtained from Moravek Biochemicals (Brea, CA). Lymphoprep (specific gravity, 1.077 grams/ml; 280 mOsm) was obtained from Nycomed Pharma AS (Oslo, Norway). LeucoSep tubes were supplied by Greiner (Frickenhausen, Germany). AmpliTaq Taq polymerase, BigDye-Terminator-Cycle-Sequencing-Ready Reaction kits, and BigDye-Primer-Cycle-Sequencing-Ready Reaction kits were supplied by Perkin-Elmer (Foster City, CA). A Qiaquick Gel Extraction kit was obtained from Qiagen (Hilden, Germany). All of the other chemicals used were of analytical grade.

Isolation of Human PBM Cells and Granulocytes.
PBM cells were isolated from 15 ml of EDTA-anticoagulated blood by centrifugation over Lymphoprep, and the cells from the interface were collected and treated with ice-cold NH4Cl to lyse the contaminating erythrocytes, as described previously (16) . The pellet of the centrifugation step over Lymphoprep containing the granulocytes and erythrocytes was diluted with 7 ml of supplemented PBS [9.2 mM Na2HPO4, 1.3 mM NaH2PO4, 140 mM NaCl, 0.2% (w/v) BSA, 13 mM sodium citrate, and 5 mM glucose (pH 7.4)] and centrifuged at 800 x g at room temperature for 10 min. To lyse the erythrocytes, the pellet was resuspended in 7 ml of ice-cold ammonium chloride solution (155 mM NH4Cl, 10 mM KHCO3, and 0.1 mM EDTA) and kept on ice for 5 min. After the addition of 10 ml of ice-cold supplemented PBS, the solution was centrifuged at 250 x g at 4°C for 10 min. The pellet was collected and subjected to another lysis step as described above. The pellet containing the granulocytes was washed once more with supplemented PBS, and the final cell pellet was frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C until further analysis.

Determination of the DPD Activity.
The activity of DPD was determined in a reaction mixture containing 35 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.4), 2.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 250 µM NADPH, and 25 µM [4-14C]thymine (16) . Separation of radiolabeled thymine from radiolabeled dihydrothymine was performed isocratically [50 mM NaH2PO4 (pH 4.5)] at a flow rate of 2 ml/min by high-performance liquid chromatography on a reversed-phase column (Alltima C18; 250 x 4.6 mm; 5 µm particle size; Alltech Associates Inc., Deerfield, IL) and a guard column (Supelguard LC-18-S; 5 µm particle size; 20 x 4.6 mm; Supelco, Bellafonte, PA) with online detection of the radioactivity, as described previously (16) . Protein concentrations were determined with a copper reduction method using bicinchoninic acid, essentially as described by Smith et al. (17) .

Determination of Intron-Exon Junctions.
The amplification of the genomic regions containing the intron-exon boundaries of exon 4, 9, 12, 15, and 21 was performed with the Genomewalk system using nested PCR with the primer sets as specified in Table 1Citation .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 PCR primers for determination of intron-exon boundaries of the DPD gene

 
PCR Amplification of Coding Exons.
DNA was isolated from purified granulocytes by standard procedures. PCR amplification of all of the 23 coding exons and flanking intronic regions was carried out using the primer sets as specified in Table 2Citation . Forward primers of exon 2, 9, 15, and 21 had a 5'-TGTAAAACGACGGCCAGT-3' extension at their 5'-ends, whereas reverse primers had a 5'-CAGGAAACAGCTATGACC-3' extension at their 5'-ends. These sequences are complementary to the labeled -21M13 and M13 reversed primers used in the dye-primer sequence reaction. Amplification of all of the exons, except exons 1 and 14, was carried out in 50-µl reaction mixtures containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 pmol of each primer, 200 µM each deoxynucleotide triphosphate, and 2 units of Taq polymerase. Amplification of exon 1 was performed in the presence of 0.75 mM MgCl2 and 5% DMSO with a hot start. Amplification of exon 14 was performed in the presence of 2 mM MgCl2. After initial denaturation for 5 min at 95°C, amplification was carried out for 30–35 cycles (1 min at 95°C, 1 min at 50°C–65°C, and 1 min at 72°C). PCR products were separated on 1% agarose gels, visualized with ethidium bromide, and purified using a Qiaquick Gel Extraction kit or used for direct sequencing.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Oligonucleotides used for genomic PCR of DPD sequences

 
Sequence Analysis.
Sequence analysis of genomic fragments amplified by PCR was carried out on an Applied Biosystems model 377 automated DNA sequencer using the dye-primer or dye-terminator method.

Statistics.
Differences in the time of the onset of toxicity and the duration of toxicity between two groups were analyzed with the two sample t test. In case of unequal variances, as indicated by Levene’s test for equality of variances, the log-transformed data were used, or the original data were tested with the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test. Comparison of the toxicity between groups was performed with the Mann-Whitney test. Comparison between the DPD activity and the degree of toxicity was performed with a one-way ANOVA. Comparisons of frequencies were carried out by the {chi}2 test. The correlation between the activity of DPD and the time of the onset of toxicity was studied by the determination of the Pearson correlation coefficients and linear regression. The level of significance was set a priori at P <= 0.05. Analyses were performed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
DPD Activity.
A large range of DPD activity (0.7–16.4 nmol/mg/h) was observed in PBM cells of patients suffering from unexpected severe toxicity after the administration of 5FU (Fig. 1)Citation . On the basis of previous experiences, it has been suggested that patients with a DPD activity <70% of that observed in the normal population might be prone to develop severe 5FU-associated side effects (15) . According to this threshold level, in approximately 59% of the cases the DPD activity was <70% of the mean DPD activity (10.0 ± 3.4 nmol/mg/h; n = 22) of healthy volunteers and comparable with that observed in obligate heterozygotes (5.5 ± 2.1 nmol/mg/h; n = 8).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. DPD activity in controls, obligate heterozygotes, and tumor patients. The mean DPD activities are indicated by solid lines.

 
Patient Characteristics and Clinical Presentation.
The characteristics of the patients suffering from severe 5FU-associated toxicity are summarized in Table 3Citation . No significant differences were observed with respect to age, gender, or type of histology between patients with a low DPD activity and patients with a normal DPD activity. A significant difference was observed, however, in the time of the onset of toxicity between both groups. In patients with a low DPD activity, the onset of toxicity occurred on average twice as fast as that compared with patients with a normal DPD activity (P < 0.05). A weak but significant correlation was observed between the DPD activity and the time of the onset of toxicity (Fig. 2)Citation . In contrast, no differences were observed with respect to the duration of the toxicity, which was approximately 20 days.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3 Patient characteristics

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. Correlation between the DPD activity and the time of onset of toxicity. The correlation between the DPD activity in PBM cells and the time of onset of toxicity was studied by determination of the Pearson correlation coefficient and linear regression.

 
The various types of toxicity encountered in the two groups of patients are shown in Tables 4Citation and 5Citation . No differences in hematological, gastrointestinal, flu-like symptoms, or other types of toxicities were observed between both groups, with the exception of grade IV neutropenia. It was observed that 55% of the patients with a decreased DPD activity suffered from grade IV neutropenia compared with 13% of the patients with a normal DPD activity (P = 0.01).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4 Toxicity profile of patients suffering from severe 5FU toxicitya

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 5 Clinical presentation of patients suffering from severe 5FU toxicityb

 
Genotype in Partially DPD-deficient Patients.
Recently, the genomic structure of the DPD gene has been published, including the intron-exon boundaries of the 23 coding exons (18) . A close examination of the published sequences showed, however, that a number of primers (exon 4, 9, 15, and 21) were situated inside the exon, thus preventing the detection of putative splice site mutations. Furthermore, a primer of exon 12 proved to be completely identical to a part of the adaptor primer provided by the Genomewalk kit. For these reasons, we have determined the intron-exon boundaries of exon 9, 12, 15, and 21 (Table 6)Citation . In addition, the sequences flanking exon 4 were determined to allow the detection of the frameshift mutation 295–298delTCAT. Sequence analysis of the DPD gene of multiple patients revealed sequence errors in the previously reported sequences of the intron-exon boundaries of exon 2, 4, 5, 8, 15, 17, 19, and 21. The correct sequences flanking the 23 exons of the DPD gene are listed in Table 6Citation . As a result, different primer sets were used to amplify the 23 exons of the DPD gene (Table 2)Citation .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 6 Splice junction sequences of the 23 exons of the DPD gene

 
Analysis of the DPD gene of 14 patients with a reduced DPD activity revealed the presence of mutations in 11 of 14 patients (Table 7)Citation . Furthermore, five patients had multiple mutations in the coding region of the DPD gene. The missense mutation 85T->C was detected in four patients (29%), whereas the splice site mutation IVS14+1G->A was detected in six patients (43%). One patient was homozygous for the 2194G->A mutation, whereas three patients were heterozygous for the 1627A->G mutation. It has been suggested that both the 2194G->A mutation and the 1627A->G mutation are common polymorphisms (11 , 13) . In addition, two novel mutations 496A->G (M166V) and 2846A->T (D949V) were detected in exon 6 and 22, respectively. The D949V mutation has also been detected in a patient with a complete DPD deficiency.3 In three patients, no mutations could be detected in the coding sequences of the DPD gene.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 7 DPD activity and DPD genotype in patients with a partial DPD deficiencya

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In this study, we have evaluated the role of a partial DPD deficiency in the etiology of unexpected severe 5FU toxicity encountered in 37 cancer patients. DPD is generally considered to be the rate-limiting step in the catabolism of the pyrimidine bases uracil, thymine, and the thymine analogue 5FU. Under normal conditions, a low DPD activity is still sufficient to maintain uracil homeostasis because obligate heterozygotes do not excrete elevated levels of pyrimidine bases (20) . After the loading of these patients with uracil or thymine, however, the accumulation of pyrimidine bases in plasma and urine increased compared with normal individuals, indicating a decreased capacity in heterozygotes to degrade the pyrimidine bases (20) . We have recently demonstrated that in a patient heterozygous for a mutant DPD allele, the AUC of 5FU in plasma was strongly increased compared with controls.3

To date, a number of patients with a partial DPD deficiency have been reported to suffer from severe toxicity after the administration of 5FU. On the basis of these experiences, a threshold limit for the DPD activity (70% of the mean DPD activity of a control population) has been proposed for patients at risk (15) . According to this threshold level, 59% of our patient group suffered from a partial DPD deficiency with a mean DPD activity comparable with that of obligate heterozygotes. Thus, the decreased capacity to degrade 5FU, reflected by a decreased activity of DPD, might be directly responsible for the observed toxicity in these patients. Recently, Milano et al. (15) reported that in their group of patients, only 36% suffered from a partial DPD deficiency. In contrast, our results demonstrate that in our group of patients, a partial DPD deficiency is the major determinant of 5FU-associated toxicity. Nevertheless, other factors, e.g., an increased expression of enzymes of the anabolic pathway, might provide a complementary mechanism for the observed increased sensitivity of patients to 5FU, especially in those patients with a normal DPD activity.

To date, conflicting results exist as to whether the activity of DPD might be influenced by gender (7 , 15) . It has been suggested that women might be particularly prone to the development of 5FU-associated toxicity because studies show that the DPD activity as well as the clearance of 5FU is, on average, 15% lower in women than in men (7 , 21) . In addition, the vast majority (79%) of the patients suffering from a partial DPD deficiency and severe adverse effects of 5FU are women (15) . In contrast, we did not observe a difference in gender between the patients with a low DPD activity and patients with a normal DPD activity. Thus, the prevalence of women with a partial DPD deficiency in the study reported by Milano et al. (15) remains enigmatic.

With respect to toxicity, no differences in hematological toxicity, gastrointestinal toxicity, flu-like symptoms, or other types of toxicities were observed between patients with a low DPD activity and patients with a normal DPD activity, with the exception of grade IV neutropenia. A significantly higher percentage (55%) of the patients with a decreased DPD activity suffered from grade IV neutropenia, compared with patients with a normal DPD activity (13%). A recent analysis of the toxicities encountered in cancer patients treated with 5FU showed that hematological toxicity, mainly neutropenia, is observed more frequently in patients treated with 5FU bolus than in patients receiving 5FU via continuous infusion (22) . Furthermore, no differences in risks of severe diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and mucositis were observed between the two types of 5FU administration (22) . Thus, the higher incidence of grade IV granulopenia in patients with a low DPD activity might be related to the increased plasma levels of 5FU, mimicking the short peak plasma concentrations of 5FU that result from conventional i.v. bolus administration of 5FU. Although neurotoxic syndromes were frequently encountered in a group of patients with decreased DPD activity (15) , they appeared to be very rare in our patient population. Our findings, however, are in line with the fact that neurotoxicity is rarely reported as one of the adverse side effects of 5FU.

A conspicuous finding was that the onset of toxicity occurred approximately twice as fast in patients with a partial DPD deficiency compared with patients with a normal DPD activity. A close relationship has been demonstrated to exist between the steady-state 5FU plasma concentration as well as the AUC of 5FU in plasma and the risk of leukopenia and mucositis (3) . A sustained high level of 5FU attributable to a decreased capacity to degrade the drug might have accelerated the onset of the clinical symptoms in patients with a low DPD activity. Recently, Etienne et al. (23) have shown that not only the DPD activity but also other factors, such as age, high serum alkaline phosphatase, and elapsed time during infusion, are independent covariables that influence the clearance of 5FU. Thus, it is conceivable that these factors also play a role in the time of onset of toxicity. The late onset of the clinical symptomatology might also allow sufficient time to apply dose adaptation schedules. Indeed, controlling the AUC by adjusting the dose of 5FU in the middle of a 5-day infusion resulted in a significant decrease in toxicity (24) .

The human DPD gene consists of 23 exons and is at least 950 kb in length, with 3 kb of coding sequence and an average intron size of about 43 kb (18) . To date, 14 different mutations have been identified in the DPD gene, and the vast majority of these mutations have been detected in patients with a complete DPD deficiency, which was accompanied by a wide variety in clinical presentation (12) . To understand the genetic basis for the partial DPD deficiency of 14 cancer patients with a reduced DPD activity, we have analyzed the coding exons of the DPD gene for the presence of mutations. In this group of patients, six different mutations were identified including: (a) one splice site mutation (IVS14+1G->A); (b) one missense mutation (85T->C); (c) two polymorphisms (1627A->G and 2194G->A); and (d) two novel mutations (496A->G and 2846A->T).

The missense mutation 85T->C has been identified previously in a homozygous state in two patients with a complete deficiency of DPD, and a functional analysis of this mutation in Escherichia coli demonstrated that the C29R mutation resulted in a mutant DPD protein without significant residual enzyme activity (25) . Recently, however, it has been suggested that the C29R mutation might be a common polymorphism because a high frequency has been noted for this mutation in a population of cancer patients, including homozygosity for this mutation in two individuals with almost normal DPD activity (11) . The apparent discrepancy between our results and those reported by Collie-Duguid et al. (11) remains enigmatic.

In three patients, no mutations could be detected in the coding sequences of the DPD gene. We cannot exclude, however, the possibility that these patients might be heterozygous for a mutation in the promoter region of the DPD gene. Recently, a polymorphism that disrupts a putative {gamma}-IFN response element was identified in a cancer patient with reduced DPD activity (26) .

Analysis of the prevalence of the various mutations among cancer patients with a partial DPD deficiency showed that the G->A point mutation in the invariant splice donor site is the most common one (43%). This observation is in line with the fact that the IVS14+1G->A mutation is also the most predominant mutation detected in patients with a complete DPD deficiency (12) . Surprisingly, the screening of 23 patients with a reduced DPD activity identified only 1 patient heterozygous for the common splice mutation (11) . Our results demonstrate that at least 57% (8 of 14) of the patients with a reduced DPD activity have a molecular basis for their deficient phenotype.

In conclusion, a partial DPD deficiency appears to play an important role in the etiology of 5FU-associated toxicity. Considering the common use of 5FU in the treatment of cancer patients, the severe 5FU-related toxicities in patients with a low activity of DPD, and the high frequency of the IVS14+1G->A mutation in DPD-deficient patients, it would be preferable for the analysis of DPD activity in PBM cells or screening for the IVS14+1G->A mutation to be routinely carried out before the start of treatment with 5FU.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. P. H. Th. J. Slee (St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands), Dr. L. V. A. M. Beex (University Hospital St. Radboud, Nijmegen, the Netherlands), Drs. P. J. M. Bakker and M. Geenen (Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands), Drs. M. J. Kersten and N. C. B. M. Overmars (Dutch Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands), Drs. B. A. Zonnenberg and F. Jeurissen (Academic Hospital Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands), Dr. E. W. Muller (Slingeland Hospital, Doetinchem, the Netherlands), Dr. F. G. A. Jansman (Hospital De Weezenlanden, Zwolle, the Netherlands), Drs. Goey and Planting (Daniëll den Hoed Kliniek, Rotterdam, the Netherlands), Dr. E. Boven (University Hospital VU, Amsterdam, the Netherlands), Drs. M. H. Bloemer and H. P. Muller (Hospital Gooi Noord, Blaricum, the Netherlands), Dr. E. Maartense (Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands), Dr. M. Peters (University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany), Dr. B. Heinrich (Fachartzt für Innere Medizin, Augsburg, Germany), Dr. H. Wassenaar (St. Vincentius Hospital, Antwerpen, Belgium), Dr. E. Gerber (Kaiser-Franz-Josef-Hospital, Vienna, Austria), Dr. J-C. Goeminne (Institute Gustave Roussy, Paris, France), and Dr. E. Holme (Sahlgrenska Universital Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden) for providing the clinical data of their patients. We thank Dr. H. R. Waterham and Fiona Ward for critical reading of the manuscript.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Academic Medical Center, Laboratory Genetic Metabolic Diseases, F0-224, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Phone: 31-205665958; Fax: 31-206962596; E-mail: a.b.vankuilenburg{at}amc.uva.nl Back

2 The abbreviations used are: 5FU, 5-fluorouracil; DPD, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase; PBM, peripheral blood mononuclear; AUC, area under the curve. Back

3 Unpublished results. Back

Received 7/17/00; revised 8/31/00; accepted 9/11/00.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Meta-analysis Group in Cancer. Efficacy of intravenous continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil compared with bolus administration in advanced colorectal cancer. J. Clin. Oncol., 16: 301-308, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Gamelin E. C., Danquechin-Dorval E. M., Dumesnil Y. F., Maillart P. J., Goudier M. J., Burtin P. C., Delva R. G., Lortholary A. H., Gesta P. H., Larra F. G. Relationship between 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) dose intensity and therapeutic response in patients with advanced colorectal cancer receiving infusional therapy containing 5-FU. Cancer (Phila.), 77: 441-451, 1996.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Gamelin E. C., Boisdron-Celle M. Dose monitoring of 5-fluorouracil in patients with colorectal or head and neck cancer: status of the art. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol., 30: 71-79, 1999.[Medline]
  4. Heggie G. D., Sommadossi J-P., Cross D. S., Huster W. J., Diasio R. B. Clinical pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil and its metabolism in plasma, urine, and bile. Cancer Res., 47: 2203-2206, 1987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Ishikawa Y., Kubota T., Otani Y., Watanaba M., Teramoto T., Kumai K., Kitajima M., Takechi T., Okabe H., Fukushima M. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity and messenger RNA level may be related to the antitumor effect of 5-fluorouracil on human tumor xenografts in nude mice. Clin. Cancer Res., 5: 883-889, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Salonga D., Danenberg K. D., Johnson M., Metzger R., Groshen S., Tsao-Wei D. D., Lenz H-J., Leichman C. G., Leichman L., Diasio R. B., Danenberg P. Colorectal tumors responding to 5-fluorouracil have low gene expression levels of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, thymidylate synthase, and thymidine phosphorylase. Clin. Cancer Res., 6: 1322-1327, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Etienne M. C., Lagrange J. L., Dassonville O., Fleming R., Thyss A., Renée N., Schneider M., Demard F., Milano G. Population study of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase in cancer patients. J. Clin. Oncol., 12: 2248-2253, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Wei X., McLeod H. L., McMurrough J., Gonzalez F. J., Fernandez-Salguero P. Molecular basis of the human dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency and 5-fluorouracil toxicity. J. Clin. Investig., 3: 610-615, 1996.
  9. Van Kuilenburg A. B. P., Vreken P., Beex L. V. A. M., Meinsma R., Van Lenthe H., De Abreu R. A., Van Gennip A. H. Heterozygosity for a point mutation in an invariant splice donor site of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and severe 5-fluorouracil related toxicity. Eur. J. Cancer, 33: 2258-2264, 1997.
  10. Kouwaki M., Hamajima N., Sumi S., Nonaka M., Sasaki M., Dobashi K., Kidouchi K., Togari H., Wada Y. Identification of novel mutations in the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene in a Japanese patient with 5-fluorouracil toxicity. Clin. Cancer Res., 4: 2999-3004, 1998.[Abstract]
  11. Collie-Duguid E. S. R., Etienne M. C., Milano G., McLeod H. L. Known variant DPYD alleles do not explain DPD deficiency in cancer patients. Pharmacogenetics, 10: 217-223, 2000.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Van Kuilenburg A. B. P., Vreken P., Abeling N. G. G. M., Bakker H. D., Meinsma R., Van Lenthe H., De Abreu R. A., Smeitink J. A. M., Kayserili H., Apak M. Y., Christensen E., Holopainen I., Pulkki K., Riva D., Botteon G., Holme E., Tulinius M., Kleijer W. J., Beemer F. A., Duran M., Niezen-Koning K. E., Smit G. P. A., Jakobs C., Smit L. M. E., Moog U., Spaapen L. J. M., Van Gennip A. H. Genotype and phenotype in patients with dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency. Hum. Genet., 104: 1-9, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Ridge S. A., Sludden J., Wei X., Sapone A., Brown O., Hardy S., Canney P., Fernandez-Salguero P., Gonzalez F. J., Cassidy J., McLeod H.L. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase pharmacogenetics in patients with colorectal cancer. Br. J. Cancer, 77: 497-500, 1998.[Medline]
  14. Ridge S. A., Sludden J., Brwon O., Robertson L., Wei X., Sapone A., Fernandez-Salguero P. M., Gonzalez F. J., Vreken P., van Kuilenburg A. B. P., Van Gennip A. H., McLeod H. L. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase pharmacogenetics in Caucasian subjects. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol., 46: 151-156, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Milano G., Etienne M. C., Pierrefite V., Barberi-Heyob M., Deporte-Fety R., Renée N. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency and fluorouracil-related toxicity. Br. J. Cancer, 79: 627-630, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Van Kuilenburg A. B. P., Van Lenthe H., Tromp A., Veltman P. C. J., Van Gennip A. H. Pitfalls in the diagnosis of patients with a partial dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency. Clin. Chem., 46: 9-17, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Smith P. K., Krohn R. I., Hermanson G. T., Mallia A. K., Gartner F. H., Provenzano M. D., Fujimoto E. K., Goeke N. M., Olson B. J., Klenk D. C. Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid. Anal. Biochem., 150: 76-85, 1985.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Wei X., Elizondo G., Sapone A., McLeod H. L., Raunio H., Fernandez-Salguero P., Gonzalez F. J. Characterization of the human dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene. Genomics, 51: 391-400, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Antonarakis S. E. Recommendations for a nomenclature system for human gene mutations. Hum. Mutat., 11: 1-3, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Van Gennip A. H., Abeling N. G., Elzinga-Zoetekouw L., Scholten L. G., Van Cruchten A., Bakker H. D. Comparative study of thymine and uracil metabolism in healthy persons and in patients with dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 253A: 111-118, 1989.
  21. Milano G., Etienne M. C., Cassuto-Viguier E., Thyss A., Santini J., Frenay M., Renee N., Schneider M., Demard F. Influence of sex and age on fluorouracil clearance. J. Clin. Oncol., 10: 1171-1175, 1992.[Abstract]
  22. Meta-analysis Group in Cancer. Toxicity of fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: effect of administration schedule and prognostic factors. J. Clin. Oncol., 16: 3537-3541, 1998.[Abstract]
  23. Etienne M-C., Chatelut E., Pivot X., Lavit M., Pujol A., Canal P., Milano G. Co-variables influencing 5-fluorouracil clearance during continuous venous infusion. A NONMEM Analysis. Eur. J. Cancer, 34: 92-97, 1998.
  24. Milano G., Etienne M. C., Renée N., Thyss A., Schneider M., Ramaioli A., Demard F. Relationship between fluorouracil systemic exposure and tumor response and patient survival. J. Clin. Oncol., 12: 1291-1295, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Vreken P., Van Kuilenburg A. B. P., Meinsma R., Van Gennip A. H. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency: identification and expression of missense mutations C29R, R886H and R235W. Hum. Genet., 101: 333-338, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Collie-Duguid E. S. R., Johnston S. J., Powrie R. H., Milano G., Etienne M. C., Rochat B., Watson G. C., McLeod H. L. Cloning and initial characterization of the human DPYD gene promoter. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 271: 28-35, 2000.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
R. Svobaite, I. Solassol, F. Pinguet, L. Ivanauskas, J. Bres, and F. M. M. Bressolle
HPLC with UV or Mass Spectrometric Detection for Quantifying Endogenous Uracil and Dihydrouracil in Human Plasma
Clin. Chem., September 1, 2008; 54(9): 1463 - 1472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
N Blijlevens and S Sonis
Palifermin (recombinant keratinocyte growth factor-1): a pleiotropic growth factor with multiple biological activities in preventing chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced mucositis
Ann. Onc., May 1, 2007; 18(5): 817 - 826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
A. Morel, M. Boisdron-Celle, L. Fey, P. Soulie, M. C. Craipeau, S. Traore, and E. Gamelin
Clinical relevance of different dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene single nucleotide polymorphisms on 5-fluorouracil tolerance.
Mol. Cancer Ther., November 1, 2006; 5(11): 2895 - 2904.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
S. J. Gardiner and E. J. Begg
Pharmacogenetics, Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes, and Clinical Practice
Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2006; 58(3): 521 - 590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. M. Rawls Jr.
Analysis of Pyrimidine Catabolism in Drosophila melanogaster Using Epistatic Interactions With Mutations of Pyrimidine Biosynthesis and {beta}-Alanine Metabolism
Genetics, March 1, 2006; 172(3): 1665 - 1674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
C. H. Smorenburg, G. J. Peters, C. J. van Groeningen, P. Noordhuis, K. Smid, A. M. G. H. van Riel, W. Dercksen, H. M. Pinedo, and G. Giaccone
Phase II study of tailored chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer with either 5-fluouracil and leucovorin or oxaliplatin and irinotecan based on the expression of thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase
Ann. Onc., January 1, 2006; 17(1): 35 - 42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
K. Seck, S. Riemer, R. Kates, T. Ullrich, V. Lutz, N. Harbeck, M. Schmitt, M. Kiechle, R. Diasio, and E. Gross
Analysis of the DPYD Gene Implicated in 5-Fluorouracil Catabolism in a Cohort of Caucasian Individuals
Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2005; 11(16): 5886 - 5892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
K. Ogura, T. Ohnuma, Y. Minamide, A. Mizuno, T. Nishiyama, S. Nagashima, M. Kanamaru, A. Hiratsuka, T. Watabe, and T. Uematsu
Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Activity in 150 Healthy Japanese Volunteers and Identification of Novel Mutations
Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2005; 11(14): 5104 - 5111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. Ukon, K. Tanimoto, T. Shimokuni, T. Noguchi, K. Hiyama, H. Tsujimoto, M. Fukushima, T. Toge, and M. Nishiyama
Activator Protein Accelerates Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Gene Transcription in Cancer Cells
Cancer Res., February 1, 2005; 65(3): 1055 - 1062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
H. Jiang, J. Lu, J. Jiang, and P. Hu
Important Role of the Dihydrouracil/Uracil Ratio in Marked Interpatient Variations of Fluoropyrimidine Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
J. Clin. Pharmacol., November 1, 2004; 44(11): 1260 - 1272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
T. Noguchi, K. Tanimoto, T. Shimokuni, K. Ukon, H. Tsujimoto, M. Fukushima, T. Noguchi, K. Kawahara, K. Hiyama, and M. Nishiyama
Aberrant Methylation of DPYD Promoter, DPYD Expression, and Cellular Sensitivity to 5-Fluorouracil in Cancer Cells
Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2004; 10(20): 7100 - 7107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
L. K. Mattison, H. Ezzeldin, M. Carpenter, A. Modak, M. R. Johnson, and R. B. Diasio
Rapid Identification of Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Deficiency by Using a Novel 2-13C-Uracil Breath Test
Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2004; 10(8): 2652 - 2658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. B. P. van Kuilenburg, R. Meinsma, B. A. Zonnenberg, L. Zoetekouw, F. Baas, K. Matsuda, N. Tamaki, and A. H. van Gennip
Dihydropyrimidinase Deficiency and Severe 5-Fluorouracil Toxicity
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2003; 9(12): 4363 - 4367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
A. B. P. van Kuilenburg, J. W. Baars, R. Meinsma, and A. H. van Gennip
Lethal 5-fluorouracil toxicity associated with a novel mutation in the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene
Ann. Onc., February 1, 2003; 14(2): 341 - 342.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
B. A. Chabner
Cytotoxic Agents in the Era of Molecular Targets and Genomics
Oncologist, August 1, 2002; 7(90003): 34 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
D. Behnke, M. Raida, K.-O. Kliche, and U. Pichlmeier
Reply
Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2002; 8(5): 1315 - 1316.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Dobritzsch, S. Ricagno, G. Schneider, K. D. Schnackerz, and Y. Lindqvist
Crystal Structure of the Productive Ternary Complex of Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase with NADPH and 5-Iodouracil. IMPLICATIONS FOR MECHANISM OF INHIBITION AND ELECTRON TRANSFER
J. Biol. Chem., April 5, 2002; 277(15): 13155 - 13166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. Raida, W. Schwabe, P. Hausler, A. B. P. Van Kuilenburg, A. H. Van Gennip, D. Behnke, and K. Hoffken
Prevalence of a Common Point Mutation in the Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase (DPD) Gene within the 5'-Splice Donor Site of Intron 14 in Patients with Severe 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)- related Toxicity Compared with Controls
Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2001; 7(9): 2832 - 2839.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Kuilenburg, A. B. P.
Right arrow Articles by van Gennip, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Kuilenburg, A. B. P.
Right arrow Articles by van Gennip, A. H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research