
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 6, 4885-4892, December 2000
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research
Experimental Therapeutics, Preclinical Pharmacology |
Efficacy of Cytotoxic Agents against Human Tumor Xenografts Is Markedly Enhanced By Coadministration of ZD1839 (Iressa), an Inhibitor of EGFR Tyrosine Kinase1
Francis M. Sirotnak2,
Maureen F. Zakowski,
Vincent A. Miller,
Howard I. Scher and
Mark G. Kris
Program of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, and Departments of Medicine and Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
The blockade of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) function with
monoclonal antibodies has major antiproliferative effects against human
tumors in vivo. Similar antiproliferative effects
against some of these same tumors have also been observed with specific
inhibitors of the EGFR-associated tyrosine kinase. One such inhibitor,
the p.o. active ZD1839 (Iressa), has pronounced antiproliferative
activity against human tumor xenografts. We now show that
coadministration of ZD1839, as with anti-EGFR, will enhance the
efficacy of cytotoxic agents against human vulvar (A431), lung (A549
and SK-LC-16 NSCL and LX-1), and prostate (PC-3 and TSU-PR1) tumors.
Oral ZD1839 (five times daily x 2) and cytotoxic agents
(i.p. every 34 days x 4) were given for a period of 2 weeks to
mice with well-established tumors. On this schedule, the maximum
tolerated dose (150 mg/kg) of ZD1839 induced partial regression of
A431, a tumor that expresses high levels of EGFR, 7080% inhibition
among tumors with low but highly variable levels of EGFR expression
(A549, SKLC-16, TSU-PR1, and PC-3), and 5055% inhibition against the
LX-1 tumor, which expresses very low levels of EGFR. ZD1839 was very
effective in potentiating most cytotoxic agents in combination
treatment against all of these tumors, irrespective of EGFR status, but
dose reduction of ZD1839 below its single-agent maximum tolerated dose
was required for optimum tolerance. The pronounced growth inhibitory
action of the platinums, cisplatin and carboplatinum, as single agents
against A431 vulvar, A549 and LX-1 lung, and TSU-PR1 and PC-3 prostate
tumors was increased severalfold when ZD1839 was added, with some
regression of A431 and PC-3 tumors. Although the taxanes, paclitaxel or
docetaxel, as single agents markedly inhibited the growth of A431,
LX-1, SK-LC-16, TSU-PR1, and PC-3, when combined with ZD1839, partial
or complete regression was usually seen. Against A549, the growth
inhibition of doxorubicin was increased 10-fold (>99%) with ZD1839.
The folate analogue, edatrexate, was highly growth inhibitory against
A549, LX-1, and TSU-PR1, whereas edatrexate combined with ZD1839
resulted in partial or complete regression in these tumors. Against the
A431 tumor, paclitaxel alone either was highly growth inhibitory or
induced some regression, but when combined with ZD1839, pronounced
regression was obtained. Combination with gemcitabine neither added nor
detracted from baseline cytotoxic efficacy, whereas ZD1839 combined
with vinorelbine was poorly tolerated. Overall, these results suggest
that potentiation of cytotoxic treatment with ZD1839 does not require
high levels of EGFR expression in the target tumors. They also suggest
significant clinical benefit from ZD1839 in combination with a variety
of widely used cytotoxic agents.
 |
INTRODUCTION
|
|---|
Two important autocrine regulatory pathways in many tumors are
constituted by the epidermal growth factor (1
, 2)
and
HER-2/neu (3
, 4)
receptors and their ligands. The blockade
of EGFR or HER-2/neu function
Mabs3
has been shown to have marked antiproliferative effects against tumors
in culture (5
, 6)
and in animals (7
, 8) .
While targeting HER-2/neu, the same blocking Mabs
brought about (9)
significant tumor
regression when used to treat patients with metastatic breast cancer
that expressed this growth factor receptor. In other studies
(10, 11, 12, 13, 14)
, coadministration of either anti-EGFR or
anti-HER-2/neu antibodies has been found to potentiate the efficacy of
cytotoxic agents as well as radiation therapy against human tumors
in vitro and in vivo. As another extension of
these studies (9
, 15)
, anti-Her-2/neu antibody
coadministered with CDDP or PTXL to patients with HER-2/neu
overexpressing breast cancer resulted in a significant increase in the
number of major responses over that obtained with PTXL alone.
More recent studies (16)
in animal model systems have
shown that the blockade of EGFR function and antiproliferative effects
against tumors can also be achieved by the use of specific inhibitors
of its associated tyrosine kinase. One of these inhibitors, the p.o.
active ZD1839, has marked effects against the growth of the A431 tumor,
which exhibits high levels of expression of EGFR. Growth of a variety
of other human tumors xenografted in mice was also inhibited by this
agent (17)
. In the present report, we describe studies
showing that coadministration of ZD1839 to mice with a variety of
cytotoxic agents will enhance their efficacy against human lung and
prostate tumors as well as the A431 vulvar tumor. Moreover, enhancement
by ZD1839 could occur in tumors with very low levels of expression of
EGFR. As in the case of combinations that use anti-EGFR and
anti-HER-2/neu antibodies, ZD1839 enhanced the antitumor activity of
DOX, platinum compounds, and taxanes. In addition, coadministration of
ZD1839 enhanced the antitumor activity of the classical folate
analogue, EDX, but not of the pyrimidine nucleoside analogue, GEM. The
combination of ZD1839 with VNR was poorly tolerated and could not be
adequately evaluated for efficacy. The results of these experiments are
described below.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS
|
|---|
Animal Studies.
The tumors used during the in vivo studies were obtained
from the National Cancer Institute, Developmental Therapeutics Program
(LX-1 lung tumor) or the American Type Culture Collection (A431, A549
and SK-LC-16 NSCL, TSU-PR1, and PC-3 prostate tumors). These human
tumors were maintained by s.c. transplantation in athymic NCR-nu
mice. After tumor growth, a cell suspension in RPMI medium was prepared
from the excised tumor and centrifuged for 5 min at 1000 x
g, and the pellet was resuspended in RPMI complete medium
with 10% FCS for implantation. For A549 and the prostate tumors, an
equal volume of Matrigel (Becton-Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) was
used to suspend the cell pellet. Aliquots of tumor cell suspension were
implanted in a group of mice, and 35 days later the mice, now bearing
tumors 56 mm in diameter, were randomized among control and the
various treated groups. The MTDs of the various agents alone or in
combination were determined in preliminary experiments comparing the
effect of varying doses. ZD1839 was given qd x five for two
successive weeks, and the cytotoxic agents were given on a schedule of
every 34 days x 4. The doses eventually selected resulted in
<10% weight loss and no toxic deaths. The average tumor diameter (two
perpendicular axes of the tumor were measured) was measured in control
and treated groups by caliper 220 days after cessation of treatment.
The data are expressed as the increase or decrease in tumor volume in
mm3
(mm3
=
4/3
r3
). Statistical analysis was carried out
by the
2 method (18)
. Working
solutions of EDX, DOX, GEM, CDDP, CBDCA, and VNR were prepared in 0.9%
NaCl (pH 7). PTXL was prepared in a 1:1 solution of Cremaphor and
ethanol, and DTXL was prepared in 13% ethanol in
H2O. ZD1839 was prepared as a lactate salt (pH
5.2). These solutions were held at -4°C for no longer than 2 weeks
except in the case of GEM, which was always used immediately. These
studies were performed in accordance with "Principles of Laboratory
Animal Care" (NIH publication No. 8523 revised 1985). EDX was
provided by Novartis. ZD1839 was provided by AstraZeneca. PTXL was
purchased from Hande Tech. GEM, DTXL, and VNR were obtained from the
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Pharmacy. NCR-nu(AT) mice were
purchased from Sprague Dawley (Madison, WI).
Semiquantitative RT-PCR.
mRNA from the various human tumors used in these studies was reverse
transcribed into cDNA using Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse
transcriptase (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) and random hexamers
in a final volume of 28 µl, according to the manufacturers
instructions. The reaction mixture was incubated at 26°C for 8 min,
heated to 42°C for 45 min and 95°C for 5 min, and then held at
4°C in a programmable thermocycler (MJ Research, Watertown, MA). The
amplification was performed with platinum Taq DNA polymerase (Life
Technologies) using the recommended buffer, 10 pmol of the primers, 1
µl of cDNA reaction mixture, and 200 µmol deoxynucleotide
triphosphate in a total volume of 50 µl. After the initial
denaturation step of 3 min at 94°C, 25 cycles of 30 s at 94°C,
30 s at 55°C, and 1 min at 72°C were used. The reaction was
extended for 10 min at 72°C. Preliminary runs were performed to
determine the maximum number of cycles that could be carried out with
cDNA derived from the high-EGFR-expressing tumor in the linear range.
This was the number of cycles selected for a comparison of EGFR
sequence product with ß-actin product among the different
tumor-derived cDNAs. EGFR primers were 5'-GTGGCTGGTTATGTCCTCATTGCC-3'
and 5'ACACTTCTTCAGGCAGGTGCCACC-3' for a 637 bp product, and ß-actin
primers were 5'-GCTACGTCGCCCTGGACTTC-3' and 5'-GTCATAGTCCGCCTAGAAGC-3'
for a 490 bp product.
IHC.
Detection of EGFR in tumor specimens was carried out with anti-EGFR
Mabs in a manner described previously (19)
.
 |
RESULTS
|
|---|
Expression of EGFR in Human Tumor Xenografts.
Preliminary to the antitumor studies of ZD1839 with and without
cytotoxic agents described below, we determined the relative level of
gene expression of EGFR among the target tumors used. Both IHC and
RT-PCR measurements showed the same rank order in relative expression
for these tumors (Table 1
and Fig. 1
). As noted in previous studies (7
, 10)
,
EGFR gene expression in A431 was extremely high. In
contrast, expression was 510-fold lower in SK-LC-16, A549, and PC-3
tumors and >10-fold lower in TSU-PR1 and LX-1 tumors. In the latter
cases, EGFR gene expression was almost undetectable
(TSU-PR1) or undetectable (LX-1) by IHC but could be detected by the
more sensitive RT-PCR method. It was also determined (Fig. 2)
by RT-PCR that the low level of expression of EGFR in LX-1 was similar
to the expression of this gene in nontransformed WI-38 human
fibroblasts that are able to grow in culture. Such normal cell types
characteristically exhibit (1
, 2)
low levels of expression
of growth factor receptors.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 1 EGFR gene expression in various human
tumors as determined by IHC and RT-PCR
Tumors were xenografted to NCR-nu mice and, after growth to an average
diameter of 1 ± 0.2 cm, excised for EGFR gene
expression analysis. Other experimental details are described in the
text. Averages of two experiments are shown.
|
|

View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Semiquantitative RT-PCR of EGFR
gene expression in human tumor xenografts. EGFR gene
expression was normalized to ß-actin
gene expression in these tumors after a 28-cycle PCR. The methodologies
used and a description of the primers used are provided in the text.
One of several replicates is shown.
|
|

View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Semiquantitative RT-PCR of EGFR
gene expression in A431, LX-1, and WI-38 cells. EGFR
gene expression was normalized to
ß-actin gene expression after a
32-cycle PCR. See text for a description of the methodologies and
primers used. One of several replicates is shown in the figure.
|
|
Studies of ZD1839 as a Single Agent.
Most of the original studies (7)
documenting antitumor
effects of Mabs that target EGFR were carried out with the A431 vulvar
carcinoma, which markedly overexpresses EGFR. Early in vivo
studies (17)
with ZD1839 were also directed at this human
tumor xenograft. As a baseline for comparing our own results obtained
with the various human lung and prostate tumors, we also carried out
studies with the A431 tumor. Single-agent activity of ZD1839 against a
range of human tumor xenografts is presented in Fig. 3
. ZD1839 had greatest activity against the A431 tumor, in which
substantial inhibition of growth at the lowest dose (50 mg/kg) and
partial regressions over the range of 100150 mg/kg were observed. A
similar dose response was observed against the other tumors. At the MTD
(150 mg/kg), ZD1839 was 7080% growth inhibitory against A549,
SK-LC-16, TSU-PR1, and PC-R tumors and 5055% growth inhibitory
against the LX-1 tumor. The doses of ZD1839 used in these studies were
all below the dose that would cause lethal toxicity on the schedule of
administration used. However, data shown in Fig. 4
record substantial (
10%) weight loss in mice after a full course of
treatment at doses >150 mg/kg. With lower doses of ZD1839, weight loss
was significantly less, and dose dependence varied from as
little as 2% (50 mg/kg) to 5% (100 mg/kg) at the end of treatment.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Antitumor dose response for ZD1839 against
several human tumor xenografts. The relative level of EGFR expression
is also shown in the figure. Average of three experiments with SE of
<±15%. *Partial regressions were observed at doses of 100 or 150
mg/kg.
|
|

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Dose response for weight loss induced by ZD1839
in NCR-nu mice. Average of three experiments with SE given in the
figure.
|
|
Tolerance Studies Combining ZD1839 with Cytotoxic Agents.
Before evaluating the antitumor activity of ZD1839 in combination with
cytotoxic agents, we determined tolerances of mice to these various
combinations. Coadministration of cytotoxic agents reduced the
tolerability of ZD1839 by varying extents that depended on the
cytotoxic agent used (Table 2)
. The maximum nonlethal dose of ZD1839 was 75 mg/kg in combination with
DOX, EDX, and both platinum compounds (CDDP and CBDCA) and 50 mg/kg in
combination with the taxanes (PTXL and DTXL) and GEM. Tolerance of
ZD1839 with VLB was extremely low (<25 mg/kg), and this
combination was not used extensively in these studies because of lack
of efficacy (data not shown). An examination of mice that did not
survive treatment with these various combinations when administered
ZD1839 above the MTD showed that pathological changes were limited to
the small intestine (data not shown). This was in the form of
multifocal ulcerative enteritis
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 2 Dose dependency for lethal toxicity of ZD1839
administered with various cytotoxic agents to athymic NCR-nu mice
|
|
Combination Treatment against the A431 Tumor.
PTXL markedly inhibited the growth of the A431 tumor, which resulted in
a similar level of regression to that observed with ZD1839 at 150 mg/kg
(Table 3)
. When PTXL was coadministered with ZD1839, with the dose of either
ZD1839 (50 mg/kg ZD1839 plus 25 mg/kg PTXL) or PTXL (150 mg/kg ZD1839
plus 18 mg/kg PTXL) attenuated, nearly complete regression was obtained
(P < 0.05), and some tumor-free mice were observed.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 3 Antitumor activity of ZD1839 and PTXL given
alone or in combination against the human A431 vulvar tumor xenografted
to nude mice
Two to three experiments of three to four mice/group.
|
|
Combination Treatment against Lung Tumors.
The growth inhibitory action of CDDP and CBDCA against the A549 tumor
was increased 4-fold in combination with ZD1839 (P <
0.01; Table 4
). In addition, coadministration of ZD1839 increased the activity of
CBDCA 3-fold against the LX-1 tumor (P < 0.01). Both
taxanes markedly inhibited the growth of the LX-1 tumor, although PTXL
was more effective than DTXL (Table 5)
. When combined with ZD1839, the activity of DTXL against LX-1 was
increased 4-fold (P < 0.01), whereas PTXL resulted in
pronounced tumor regression with three of nine mice having no
detectable tumor at the end of treatment. In mice treated with a
combination of PTXL and ZD1839, regression of the LX-1 tumor was
evident within the first week of treatment and continued for
10 days
after treatment was stopped (Fig. 5)
. In other experiments, both PTXL and DTXL resulted in complete growth
inhibition of the A549 tumor with some indication of slight regression
(Table 5)
. By comparison, when given with ZD1839, both agents induced
pronounced regression (P < 0.01) with some tumor-free
mice found after treatment.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 4 Antitumor activity of ZD1839 and platinum
compounds given alone or in combination against human lung tumors
xenografted to nude mice
Two to three experiments of three to four mice/group.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 5 Antitumor activity of ZD1839, taxanes, and GEM
given alone or in combination against human lung tumors xenografted to
nude mice
Two to three experiments of three to four mice/group.
|
|

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5. The effect of ZD1839 alone and in combination
with PTXL against the LX-1 tumor. Average of three experiments at three
to four mice/group with SE of <13%. Animals treated with ZD1839
(qd x 5) x 2 and PTXL (every 34 days x 4).
Additional details are given in the text.
|
|
ZD1839 also markedly enhanced the highly growth inhibitory action of
EDX against both LX-1 and SK-LC-16 tumors (Table 6)
. This combination resulted in nearly complete regression of LX-1 in
all mice, with some tumor-free mice found after the completion of
therapy. A similar but somewhat more modest result was obtained with
this combination against SK-LC-16. In addition, ZD1839 substantially
potentiated the activity of DOX against the A549 tumor. Whereas DOX
alone inhibited tumor growth by nearly 90%, coadministration of ZD1839
resulted in almost complete growth inhibition (P <
0.005). In contrast, ZD1839 did not improve the activity of GEM against
A549 or SK-LC-16 tumors, although nearly complete growth inhibition was
observed with GEM alone (Tables 5
and 6)
.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 6 Antitumor activity of ZD1839, adriamycin, GEM,
and EDX given alone or in combination against human lung tumors
xenografted to nude mice
Two experiments of four mice/group.
|
|
Combination Treatment against Prostate Tumors.
Coadministration of ZD1839 increased antitumor activity of CBDCA
against PC-3 tumors by 5-fold (P < 0.01), resulting in
tumor regression and two of eight tumor-free mice (Table 7)
. Whereas PTXL alone had pronounced growth inhibitory activity against
both PC-3 and TSU-PR1 tumors, combination with ZD1839 resulted in tumor
regression in each case, with five of nine and two of eight complete
regressions of PC-3 and TSU-PR1, respectively (Table 8
and Fig. 6
). The combination of PTXL and ZD1839 against PC-3 induced onset of
regression after the first week of therapy, with regression continuing
for 810 days after the cessation of therapy. Finally, although EDX
was less growth inhibitory than PTXL against TSU-PR1, coadministration
of ZD1839 with EDX resulted in partial tumor regression (Table 8)
.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 7 Antitumor activity of ZD1839 and platinum
compounds given alone or in combination against human prostate tumors
xenografted to nude mice
Two experiments of four mice/group.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 8 Antitumor activity of ZD1839, taxol, and EDX
given alone or in combination against human prostate tumors xenografted
to nude mice
Two to three experiments of three to four mice/group.
|
|

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6. The effect of ZD1839 alone and in combination
with PTXL against the PC-3 tumor. Average of three experiments at three
to four mice/group with a SE of <±14%. Animals treated with ZD1839
(qd x 5) x 2 and PTXL (every 34 days x 4). See text
for additional details.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION
|
|---|
As a single agent, ZD1839 resulted in regression of the vulvar
A431 tumor, which markedly overexpresses EGFR. Against the tumors
(A549, SK-LC-16, PC-3, and TSU-PR1 LX-1) with much lower levels of EGFR
expression, ZD1839 was only growth inhibitory. Growth inhibition by
ZD1839 was lowest against the lung LX-1 tumor, which had the lowest
EGFR expression. These results are consistent with an earlier study
(17)
that demonstrated antitumor activity for ZD1839 in
human vulvar, lung, prostate, and ovarian tumor xenografts. ZD1839
monotherapy was well tolerated in mice, and the maximum nonlethal dose
was 150 mg/kg.
The combination of ZD1839 with all cytotoxic agents in this study
required a 2-fold or greater attenuation of the ZD1839 dose below its
single-agent maximum nonlethal dose of 150 mg/kg for optimum tolerance.
Interestingly, limiting toxicity for ZD1839 in combination was
associated only with the small intestine and appears to reflect the
extraordinarily rapid renewal of the mouse intestinal epithelium,
compared with proliferative compartments elsewhere. As such unique
sensitivity at this organ site is not usually a characteristic of
humans exposed to these cytotoxic agents, similar dose attenuation may
not be necessary in clinical trials.
Coadministration of ZD1839 markedly enhanced the antitumor activity of
a number of cytotoxic agents with highly diverse mechanisms of action.
The effects of ZD1839 were most pronounced in combination with taxanes
(PTXL, DTXL), platinums (CDDP, CBDCA), and the folate antagonist,
EDX. Similar potentiation occurred with DOX, although the
overall level of efficacy observed was much lower than that obtained
with taxanes, platinums, and EDX. Combination with GEM neither added
nor detracted from baseline cytotoxic efficacy, whereas toxicity
precluded assessment of efficacy in combination with VNR. Although the
platinums, DOX, and EDX ultimately induce damage of DNA, they achieve
this by very different mechanisms. The taxanes, on the other hand,
effectively target microtubules. Thus, the interaction between ZD1839
and cytotoxic agents underlying the observed potentiation is most
likely downstream of the sites of specific pharmacological effects of
these agents and more globally determined at the level of growth
control signaling. In this respect, ZD1839 is similar to anti-EGFR Mabs
(10
, 11) in their ability to potentiate the action
of various cytotoxic agents with different mechanisms of action. In
view of the above, it was of interest to note that ZD1839 did not
potentiate the action of the pyrimidine nucleoside analogue, GEM. The
underlying basis for the lack of efficacy of this combination, as well
as the exceedingly high toxicity of VNR with ZD1839, is unknown.
Strikingly, the degree of potentiation of cytotoxic action in a variety
of tumor types was not dependent upon high levels of expression of
EGFR. The basis for this result is not known. However, these results
may indicate that a lower threshold of antitumor response to ZD1839 at
the level of EGFR tyrosine kinase was necessary for potentiation of
cytotoxic agents. Alternatively, EGFR expression may be up-regulated by
the cytotoxic agent (20)
, possibly to counteract the
induction of apoptosis by the cytotoxic drug. Indeed, high levels
of EGFR expression have been found in drug-resistant cell lines
(21)
. Finally, it should be mentioned that significant
inhibition by ZD1839 of kinases other than EGFR tyrosine kinase,
although not completely ruled out, would appear unlikely. Earlier
in vitro studies (22)
have shown that in
contrast to its potent inhibition of EGFR tyrosine kinase, inhibition
by ZD1839 was 102-104-fold
less against kinases associated with erbB2, vascular EGFRs, KDR, and
eflt or against a large group of serine/threonine kinases, including
protein kinase C, mitogen-activated protein/extracellular
signal-regulated kinase-1, and extracellular signal-regulated
kinase-2.
Given that the combinations of ZD1839 with all of these cytotoxic
agents required substantial attenuation of the dose of ZD1839 for
optimum tolerance and the observation that the degree of potentiation
was not dependent upon the level of EGFR expression, the results become
even more impressive and suggest promising clinical potential for the
use of these combined agents in the treatment of at least two major
neoplastic disorders (lung and prostate cancer) and possibly others.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
|
|---|
The technical assistance of Jackie She and Fei Lei is greatly
appreciated.
 |
FOOTNOTES
|
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
1 Supported in part by Grants CA08748 and CA56517
from the National Cancer Institute, the Simon Benlevy Cancer Fund, and
the Pepsico Foundation. 
2 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, at Laboratory for Molecular Therapeutics, Memorial
Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021.
Phone: (212) 639-7952; Fax: (212) 794-4342; E-mail: sirotnaf{at}mskcc.org 
3 The abbreviations used are: Mab, monoclonal
antibody; MTD, maximum tolerated dose; CDDP, cisplatin; CBDCA,
carboplatinum; DOX, doxorubicin; PTXL, paclitaxel; DTXL, docetaxel;
EDX, edatrexate (10-ethyl-10-deazaaminopterin); GEM, gemcitabine; VNR,
vinorelbine; IHC, immunohistochemistry; RT-PCR, reverse
transcriptase-PCR; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; qd, once
daily. 
Received 4/19/00;
revised 8/ 1/00;
accepted 8/10/00.
 |
REFERENCES
|
|---|
-
Rosenthal A., Lindquist P. B., Bringman T. S., Goeddel D. V., Derynck R. Expression in rat fibroblasts of human transforming growth factor-
cDNA results in transformation. Cell, 46: 301-309, 1986.[CrossRef][Medline]
-
DiMarco E., Pierce J. H., Fleming T. P., Kraus M. H., Molloy C. J., Aaronson S. A., Di Fiore P. P. Autocrine interaction between TGF-
and the EGF-receptor: quantitative requirements for induction of the malignant phenotype. Oncogene, 4: 831-838, 1989.[Medline]
-
Slamon D. J., Godolphin W., Jones L., Holt J., Wong S., Keith D., Levin W., Stuart S., Udone J., Velrich A., Press M. F. Studies of the Her-2/neu proto-oncogene in human breast and ovarian cancer. Science (Washington DC), 244: 707-712, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Slamon D., Press M., Godolphin W., Ramos L., Harlan P., Shek L., Stuart S., Ulrich H. Studies of the Her2/neu oncogene in human breast cancer. Cancer Cells (Cold Spring Harbor), 7: 371-379, 1989.
-
Sato J. D., Kawamoto T., Le A. D., Mendelsohn J., Polikoff J., Sato G. H. Biological effects in vitro of monoclonal antibodies to human EGF receptors. Mol. Biol. Med., 1: 511-529, 1983.[Medline]
-
Sarup J. C., Johnson R. M., King K. L., Fendly B. M., Lipari M. T., Napier M. A., Ullrich A., Shepard H. M. Characterization of an anti-p185HER2 monoclonal antibody that stimulates receptor function and inhibits tumor cell growth. Growth Regul., 1: 72-82, 1991.[Medline]
-
Masui H., Kawamoto T., Sato J. D., Wolf B., Sato G., Mendelsohn J. Growth inhibition of human tumor cells in athymic mice by anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies. Cancer Res., 44: 1002-1007, 1984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Park, J. W., Stagg, R., Lewis, G. D., Carter, P., Maneval, D., Slamon, D. J., Jaffe, H., and Shepard, H. M. Anti-p185HER2 monoclonal antibodies: biological properties and potential for immunotherapy. In: R. B. Dickson and M. E. Lippman (eds.), Genes, Oncogenes and Hormones. Advances in Cellular and Molecular Biology of Breast Cancer, pp. 194211. Boston: Kluiwer Academic Publishers, 1991.
-
Baselga J., Tripathy D., Mendelsohn J., Baughman S., Benz C. C., Dantis L., Sklarin N. T., Seidman A. D., Hudis C. A., Moore J., Rosen P. P., Twaddell T., Henderson I. C., Norton L. Phase II study of weekly intravenous recombinant humanized anti-p185Her2 monoclonal antibody in patients with Her2/neu-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol., 14: 737-744, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Fan Z., Baselga J., Masui H., Mendelsohn J. Antitumor effect of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies plus cis-diamminedichloroplatinum on well established A431 cell xenografts. Cancer Res., 53: 4637-4642, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Baselga J., Norton L., Masui H., Pandiella A., Coplan K., Miller W. H., Mendelsohn J. Antitumor effects of doxorubicin in combination with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 85: 1327-1333, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Pietras R. J., Fendly B. M., Chazin V. R., Pegram M. D., Howell S. B., Slamon D. J. Antibody to HER2/neu receptor blocks DNA repair after cisplatin in human breast and ovarian cancer cells. Oncogene, 9: 1829-1838, 1994.[Medline]
-
Hancock M. C., Langton B. C., Chan T., Toy P., Monahan J. J., Mischak R. P., Shawver L. K. A monoclonal antibody against c-erb-B-2 protein enhances the cytotoxicity of diamminedichloroplatinum against human breast and ovarian tumor cell lines. Cancer Res., 51: 4575-4580, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Pietras R. J., Poen J. C., Gallardo D., Wongvipat P. N., Lee J. H., Slamon D. J. Monoclonal antibody to HER-2/neu receptor modulates repair of radiation-induced DNA damage and enhances radiosensitivity of human breast cancer cells overexpressing this oncogene. Cancer Res., 59: 1347-1355, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Pegram M. D., Lipton A., Hayes D. F., Weber B. L., Baselga J. M., Tripathy D., Baly D., Baughman S. A., Twaddell T., Glaspy J. A., Slamon D. J. Phase II study of receptor-enhanced chemosensitivity using recombinant humanized anti-p185Her2/neu monoclonal antibody plus cis platinum in patients with Her2/neu-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer refractory to chemotherapy treatment. J. Clin. Oncol., 16: 2659-2671, 1998.[Abstract]
-
Lawrence D. S., Niu J. Protein kinase inhibitors: the tyrosine- specific protein kinases. Pharmacol. Ther., 77: 81-114, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Woodburn J. R., Barker A. J., Gibson K. H., Ashton S. E., Wakeling A. E., Carry B. J., Scarlett L., Henthorn L. R. ZD1839, an epidermal growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor selected for clinical development. Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res., 38: 633 1997.
-
Zar, J. H. Biostatistical Analysis, 2nd ed., pp. 145146. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1984.
-
Scher H. I., Sarkis A., Reuter V., Cohen D., Netto G., Petrylak D., Lianes P., Fuks Z., Mendelsohn J., Cordon-Cordo C. Changing pattern of expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor and transforming growth factor
in the progression of prostatic neoplasms. Clin. Cancer Res., 1: 545-550, 1995.[Abstract]
-
Frassoldati A., Adami F., Banzi C., Criscuolo M., Piccinini L., Silingardi V. Changes of biological features in breast cancer cells determined by primary chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 44: 185-192, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Wosikowski K., Schuurhuis C., Kops G. J., Saceda M., Bates S. E. Altered gene expression in drug-resistant human breast cancer cells. Clin. Cancer Res., 3: 2405-2414, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Woodburn J. R., Kendrew J., Fennell M., Wakeling A. E. ZD1839 (Iressa) a selective growth factor receptor kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI): inhibition of c-fos mRNA, an intermediate marker of EGFR activation, correlates with tumor growth inhibition. Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res., 41: 402 2000.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Vlotides, E. Siegel, I. Donangelo, S. Gutman, S.-G. Ren, and S. Melmed
Rat Prolactinoma Cell Growth Regulation by Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Ligands
Cancer Res.,
August 1, 2008;
68(15):
6377 - 6386.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Zemskova, E. Sahakian, S. Bashkirova, and M. Lilly
The PIM1 Kinase Is a Critical Component of a Survival Pathway Activated by Docetaxel and Promotes Survival of Docetaxel-treated Prostate Cancer Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 25, 2008;
283(30):
20635 - 20644.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Magda, P. Lecane, Z. Wang, W. Hu, P. Thiemann, X. Ma, P. K. Dranchak, X. Wang, V. Lynch, W. Wei, et al.
Synthesis and Anticancer Properties of Water-Soluble Zinc Ionophores
Cancer Res.,
July 1, 2008;
68(13):
5318 - 5325.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-C. Ko, S.-C. Ciou, C.-M. Cheng, L.-H. Wang, J.-H. Hong, M.-Y. Jheng, S.-T. Ling, and Y.-W. Lin
Involvement of Rad51 in cytotoxicity induced by epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (gefitinib, IressaR) and chemotherapeutic agents in human lung cancer cells
Carcinogenesis,
July 1, 2008;
29(7):
1448 - 1458.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Ren, B. Korchin, Q.-S. Zhu, C. Wei, A. Dicker, J. Heymach, A. Lazar, R. E. Pollock, and D. Lev
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Blockade in Combination with Conventional Chemotherapy Inhibits Soft Tissue Sarcoma Cell Growth In vitro and In vivo
Clin. Cancer Res.,
May 1, 2008;
14(9):
2785 - 2795.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Mimeault, P. P. Mehta, R. Hauke, and S. K. Batra
Functions of Normal and Malignant Prostatic Stem/Progenitor Cells in Tissue Regeneration and Cancer Progression and Novel Targeting Therapies
Endocr. Rev.,
April 1, 2008;
29(2):
234 - 252.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. G. Chiorean, J. M. Porter, A. E. Foster, A. S.H. Al Omari, C. A. Yoder, K. L. Fife, R. M. Strother, D. J. Murry, M. Yu, D. R. Jones, et al.
A Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Trial of Erlotinib in Combination with Weekly Docetaxel in Patients with Taxane-Naive Malignancies
Clin. Cancer Res.,
February 15, 2008;
14(4):
1131 - 1137.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Cavazzoni, R. R. Alfieri, C. Carmi, V. Zuliani, M. Galetti, C. Fumarola, R. Frazzi, M. Bonelli, F. Bordi, A. Lodola, et al.
Dual mechanisms of action of the 5-benzylidene-hydantoin UPR1024 on lung cancer cell lines
Mol. Cancer Ther.,
February 1, 2008;
7(2):
361 - 370.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Wang, P. Guo, X. Wang, Q. Zhou, and J. M. Gallo
Preclinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models of gefitinib and the design of equivalent dosing regimens in EGFR wild-type and mutant tumor models
Mol. Cancer Ther.,
February 1, 2008;
7(2):
407 - 417.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Choi and J.N. Myers
Molecular Pathogenesis of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Implications for Therapy
J. Dent. Res.,
January 1, 2008;
87(1):
14 - 32.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Engelman, K. Zejnullahu, C.-M. Gale, E. Lifshits, A. J. Gonzales, T. Shimamura, F. Zhao, P. W. Vincent, G. N. Naumov, J. E. Bradner, et al.
PF00299804, an Irreversible Pan-ERBB Inhibitor, Is Effective in Lung Cancer Models with EGFR and ERBB2 Mutations that Are Resistant to Gefitinib
Cancer Res.,
December 15, 2007;
67(24):
11924 - 11932.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Chen, M. Kane, J. Song, J. Campana, A. Raben, K. Hu, L. Harrison, H. Quon, J. Dancey, A. Baron, et al.
Phase I Trial of Gefitinib in Combination With Radiation or Chemoradiation for Patients With Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Head and Neck Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 1, 2007;
25(31):
4880 - 4886.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Mimeault and S. K. Batra
Interplay of distinct growth factors during epithelial mesenchymal transition of cancer progenitor cells and molecular targeting as novel cancer therapies
Ann. Onc.,
October 1, 2007;
18(10):
1605 - 1619.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. M. Harari, G. W. Allen, and J. A. Bonner
Biology of Interactions: Antiepidermal Growth Factor Receptor Agents
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 10, 2007;
25(26):
4057 - 4065.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Taylor, D. Hershman, N. Shah, N. Suciu-Foca, D. P. Petrylak, R. Taub, L. Vahdat, B. Cheng, M. Pegram, K. L. Knutson, et al.
Augmented HER-2 Specific Immunity during Treatment with Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy
Clin. Cancer Res.,
September 1, 2007;
13(17):
5133 - 5143.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Arwert, S. Hingtgen, J.-L. Figueiredo, H. Bergquist, U. Mahmood, R. Weissleder, and K. Shah
Visualizing the Dynamics of EGFR Activity and Antiglioma Therapies In vivo
Cancer Res.,
August 1, 2007;
67(15):
7335 - 7342.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Yamasaki, D. Zhang, C. Bartholomeusz, T. Sudo, G. N. Hortobagyi, K. Kurisu, and N. T. Ueno
Sensitivity of breast cancer cells to erlotinib depends on cyclin-dependent kinase 2 activity
Mol. Cancer Ther.,
August 1, 2007;
6(8):
2168 - 2177.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. P. Piechocki, G. H. Yoo, S. K. Dibbley, and F. Lonardo
Breast Cancer Expressing the Activated HER2/neu Is Sensitive to Gefitinib In vitro and In vivo and Acquires Resistance through a Novel Point Mutation in the HER2/neu
Cancer Res.,
July 15, 2007;
67(14):
6825 - 6843.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. S. Choe, Z. Chen, C. M. Klass, X. Zhang, and D. M. Shin
Enhancement of Docetaxel-Induced Cytotoxicity by Blocking Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and Cyclooxygenase-2 Pathways in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
Clin. Cancer Res.,
May 15, 2007;
13(10):
3015 - 3023.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Mimeault, S. L. Johansson, G. Vankatraman, E. Moore, J.-P. Henichart, P. Depreux, M.-F. Lin, and S. K. Batra
Combined targeting of epidermal growth factor receptor and hedgehog signaling by gefitinib and cyclopamine cooperatively improves the cytotoxic effects of docetaxel on metastatic prostate cancer cells
Mol. Cancer Ther.,
March 1, 2007;
6(3):
967 - 978.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Cruz, A Ocana, E Del Barco, and A Pandiella
Targeting receptor tyrosine kinases and their signal transduction routes in head and neck cancer
Ann. Onc.,
March 1, 2007;
18(3):
421 - 430.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Steiner, C. Joynes, R. Bassi, S. Wang, J. R. Tonra, Y. R. Hadari, and D. J. Hicklin
Tumor Growth Inhibition with Cetuximab and Chemotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Xenografts Expressing Wild-type and Mutated Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor
Clin. Cancer Res.,
March 1, 2007;
13(5):
1540 - 1551.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Shrader, M. S. Pino, G. Brown, P. Black, L. Adam, M. Bar-Eli, C. P.N. Dinney, and D. J. McConkey
Molecular correlates of gefitinib responsiveness in human bladder cancer cells
Mol. Cancer Ther.,
January 1, 2007;
6(1):
277 - 285.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Ono and M. Kuwano
Molecular Mechanisms of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Activation and Response to Gefitinib and Other EGFR-Targeting Drugs
Clin. Cancer Res.,
December 15, 2006;
12(24):
7242 - 7251.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. H. Johnson
Targeted therapies in combination with chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.
Clin. Cancer Res.,
July 15, 2006;
12(14):
4451s - 4457s.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Kollmannsberger, M. Schittenhelm, F. Honecker, J. Tillner, D. Weber, K. Oechsle, L. Kanz, and C. Bokemeyer
A phase I study of the humanized monoclonal anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody EMD 72000 (matuzumab) in combination with paclitaxel in patients with EGFR-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
|