
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Editorial |
Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin 53792
The potential for modern molecular radiobiology to provide meaningful contributions to cancer therapeutics has never been brighter. The classic radiobiology framework assembled over the last three to four decades has not only provided critical insights regarding cell cycle kinetics, DNA damage/repair systems, and the biological basis for fractionation but now affords the opportunity to exploit new molecular targets which may prove particularly valuable in cancer therapy when manipulated in concert with the delivery of ionizing radiation (1, 2, 3) .
To highlight one arena in which modern molecular biology appears to hold particular promise for cancer therapeutics, consider the recent logarithmic expansion in our appreciation and understanding regarding the importance of cellular growth factors and signal transduction systems. There is perhaps no more fertile area of translational cancer research at present than that reflected by the collaborative and sometimes competitive efforts of academia and industry to identify, develop, test, and market new growth factor and signal transduction inhibitors for cancer therapy. Inhibitors for virtually every two- to four-letter growth factor or signal transduction acronym are currently under investigation including CDK (cyclin-dependent kinase), PKC (protein kinase C), EGF (epidermal growth factor), MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase), FT (farnesyl transferase), MEK (mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase), and VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) to name only a very popular few! How valuable these signal transduction inhibitors ultimately prove to be in cancer therapy may depend not only on the traditional characteristics of agent design and delivery but also on the manner in which they are combined with other cytotoxic or cytostatic agents.
A theoretical rationale regarding the value of combining radiation with specific growth factor or signal transduction inhibitors is easy to portray. Many of the inhibitors are primarily cytostatic (antiproliferative) without the capacity to effectively eradicate malignant cells on their own. Seldom have single agents delivered alone proven as fully effective in human cancer therapy as carefully crafted combinations of agents with complementary activities and mechanisms of action. Notable recent advances in our capacity to deliver high precision, three-dimensional/conformal radiation underscore an anticipation that combining molecular-based systemic therapies with radiation will selectively enhance toxicity, primarily within the confines of the tumor itself, precisely where oncologists have always wished to deposit toxicity in the first place.
One particular growth factor receptor family and signal transduction system that has received considerable recent attention in oncology therapeutics involves the ErbB receptor tyrosine kinase family (4 , 5) . The story of Herceptin, which targets the ErbB-2 receptor (HER-2/neu), in the treatment of women with breast cancer is a testament for bench-to-bedside translational molecular cancer research (6 , 7) . Recent preclinical data further suggest that combining radiation with monoclonal antibody blockade of the HER-2/neu receptor can enhance radiation response and inhibit DNA repair in breast cancer cells (8) . A remarkably similar picture is now emerging regarding the ErbB-1 receptor (EGFR3 ), in which development of the monoclonal antibody C225 shows promise across a spectrum of epithelial tumors, particularly for those that overexpress EGFR such as squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Blockade of the EGFR with C225 enhances the in vitro radiosensitivity of human squamous cell carcinomas (9) , and phase III clinical trials are now examining the capacity of C225 to enhance tumor control rates in patients with advanced head and neck cancers treated with radiation or with cisplatin chemotherapy.
The article by Milas et al. (10) in this issue of Clinical Cancer Research provides additional promising preclinical data regarding the in vivo activity of EGFR blockade with C225 in conjunction with ionizing radiation. A greater than 3-fold enhancement in tumor response after single-fraction radiation exposure is demonstrated in athymic mice bearing squamous cell carcinoma xenografts when they receive systemic C225. The potency of the in vivo antitumor effect observed (more potent than that observed in cell culture) using the combination of C225 and radiation suggests that mechanisms beyond simple proliferative growth inhibition are operational in the in vivo setting.
Several distinct lines of inquiry are currently under investigation in
an attempt to better understand specific cellular mechanisms of action
that may contribute to the antitumor potency of EGFR blockade plus
radiation within in vivo model systems (Table 1
and Fig. 1
). Recent data from several laboratories
suggest that EGFR blockade with C225 may serve to inhibit tumor
angiogenesis (10, 11, 12, 13)
, and this result appears to be
augmented when effected in combination with radiation (10
, 13)
. In addition to the established data demonstrating an
antiproliferative effect of EGFR blockade with C225, with resultant
G1 cell cycle arrest (14
, 15)
data
are now emerging regarding the capacity of C225 to modulate apoptosis,
inhibit cellular repair of radiation-induced damage, and influence
cellular migration capacity and possibly metastases (9
, 12
, 16
, 17)
. It may be that molecular down-regulation of certain
mitogenic signal transduction pathways, including the EGFR system
cascade, can disrupt cellular recovery processes after radiation
damage, although precise mechanisms for this are only beginning to be
unraveled.
|
|
FOOTNOTES
1 P.M.H. is the recipient of a laboratory research
award from ImClone Systems Inc. and holds stock options in the company. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, at Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin
Comprehensive Cancer Center, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI
53792-0600. Phone: (608) 263-8500; Fax: (608) 263-9167; E-mail: harari{at}mail.humonc.wisc.edu ![]()
3 The abbreviation used is: EGFR, epidermal growth
factor receptor. ![]()
Received 11/15/99; accepted 11/15/99.
REFERENCES
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. A. Morgan, L. A. Parsels, L. E. Kollar, D. P. Normolle, J. Maybaum, and T. S. Lawrence The Combination of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors with Gemcitabine and Radiation in Pancreatic Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2008; 14(16): 5142 - 5149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Chen and C. S. Nirodi The Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor: A Role in Repair of Radiation-Induced DNA Damage Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2007; 13(22): 6555 - 6560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Bianco, E. Giovannetti, F. Ciardiello, V. Mey, S. Nannizzi, G. Tortora, T. Troiani, F. Pasqualetti, G. Eckhardt, M. de Liguoro, et al. Synergistic Antitumor Activity of ZD6474, An Inhibitor of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signaling, with Gemcitabine and Ionizing Radiation against Pancreatic Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2006; 12(23): 7099 - 7107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. R. Cardenes, E. G. Chiorean, J. DeWitt, M. Schmidt, and P. Loehrer Locally advanced pancreatic cancer: current therapeutic approach. Oncologist, June 1, 2006; 11(6): 612 - 623. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. G. Czito, C. G. Willett, J. C. Bendell, M. A. Morse, D. S. Tyler, N. H. Fernando, C. R. Mantyh, G. C. Blobe, W. Honeycutt, D. Yu, et al. Increased Toxicity With Gefitinib, Capecitabine, and Radiation Therapy in Pancreatic and Rectal Cancer: Phase I Trial Results J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2006; 24(4): 656 - 662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. Dicker and U. Rodeck Predicting the Future From Trials of the Past: Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Expression and Outcome of Fractionated Radiation Therapy Trials J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2005; 23(24): 5437 - 5439. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Crombet, M. Osorio, T. Cruz, C. Roca, R. del Castillo, R. Mon, N. Iznaga-Escobar, R. Figueredo, J. Koropatnick, E. Renginfo, et al. Use of the Humanized Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Monoclonal Antibody h-R3 in Combination With Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Patients J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2004; 22(9): 1646 - 1654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. E. Kim, Y. B. Kim, N. H. Cho, H.-C. Chung, H. R. Pyo, J. D. Lee, T. K. Park, W. S. Koom, M. Chun, and C. O. Suh Synchronous Coexpression of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and Cyclooxygenase-2 in Carcinomas of the Uterine Cervix: A Potential Predictor of Poor Survival Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2004; 10(4): 1366 - 1374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Soulieres, N. N. Senzer, E. E. Vokes, M. Hidalgo, S. S. Agarwala, and L. L. Siu Multicenter Phase II Study of Erlotinib, an Oral Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Cancer of the Head and Neck J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2004; 22(1): 77 - 85. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Bianco, G. Tortora, R. Bianco, R. Caputo, B. M. Veneziani, R. Caputo, V. Damiano, T. Troiani, G. Fontanini, D. Raben, et al. Enhancement of Antitumor Activity of Ionizing Radiation by Combined Treatment with the Selective Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor ZD1839 (Iressa) Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2002; 8(10): 3250 - 3258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-M. Huang, J. Li, E. A. Armstrong, and P. M. Harari Modulation of Radiation Response and Tumor-induced Angiogenesis after Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibition by ZD1839 (Iressa) Cancer Res., August 1, 2002; 62(15): 4300 - 4306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Baselga New Therapeutic Agents Targeting the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2000; 18(90001): 54s - 59. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |