Clinical Cancer Research The Science of Cancer Health Disparities
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Skaug, V.
Right arrow Articles by Haugen, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Skaug, V.
Right arrow Articles by Haugen, A.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 6, 1031-1037, March 2000
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research


Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates

p53 Mutations in Defined Structural and Functional Domains Are Related to Poor Clinical Outcome in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients1

Vidar Skaug2, David Ryberg, Elin H. Kure Mohammed O. Arab3, Lodve Stangeland, Andreas O. Myking and Aage Haugen

Department of Toxicology, National Institute of Occupational Health, N-0033 Oslo, Norway [V. S., D. R., E. H. K., M. O. A., A. H.], and Haukeland Hospital, N-5021 Bergen, Norway [L. S., A. O. M.]


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The prognostic value of p53 status in non-small cell lung cancer has been investigated in 148 patients with clinical stage I-IIIB disease. Tumor tissues were examined for mutations in exons 4–9, with emphasis on defined structural and functional domains. Eighty-four mutations were detected in 83 (54%) of the patients. Eighty-eight percent of the mutations were within exons 5–8, and 12% of the mutations were within exons 4 and 9. Missense mutations occurred in 67% of the tumors, and 30% were null mutations (10% stop mutations, 15% frameshift mutations, and 5% splice site mutations). Patients with mutations in p53 had a significantly higher risk for lung cancer-related death and for death from all causes than those with wild-type p53 [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.09 and 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.20–3.64 and HR = 1.69 and 95% CI = 1.06–2.70, respectively]. Mutations in p53 related to even still poorer lung cancer-related prognosis were found at the following locations: (a) exon 8 (HR = 3.5; 95% CI, 1.59–7.71)]; (b) the structural domains L2 + L3 (HR = 2.36; 95% CI, 1.18–4.74), and (c) codons involved in zinc binding (HR = 11.7; 95% CI, 3.56–38.69). Together, the biologically functional group of severe flexible mutants (codons 172, 173, 175, 176, 179, 181, 238, 245, and 267) and severe contact mutants (248, 282) were significantly related to shorter lung cancer-related survival (HR = 4.16; 95% CI, 1.93–8.97). Squamous cell carcinoma was the dominant histological type in tumors involved in poor prognosis in exon 8 (HR = 3.19; 95% CI, 1.07–9.45). These results indicate that mutations in defined structural and functional domains of p53 may be useful molecular biological markers for prognosis and treatment strategy in non-small cell lung cancer patients.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Lung cancer is the most common cancer worldwide and is predicted to remain a major cause of cancer deaths in the next century because of contributions from the East European and developing countries (1, 2, 3, 4) . The survival rate for NSCLC4 is related to clinical stage but remains poor across all stages (5) . Although prognosis is generally poor, there are now somewhat more promising outlooks for treatment of these patients (6, 7, 8) . Genetic markers may be used in addition to staging for assigning NSCLC patients to subgroups for clinical trials and more intense adjuvant therapy.

Alterations in proto-oncogenes (K-ras, c-myc, and HER2/neu) and tumor suppressor genes (Rb, p16, and p53) have been reported to play crucial roles in lung tumor development. Alterations in the p53 gene are the most common genetic change in lung cancer: occurring in about 80% in small-cell lung cancer and in about 50% in NSCLC (9 , 10) . The p53 gene is of critical importance in cell cycle control, DNA repair, and programmed cell death (reviewed by Levine in Ref. 11 ). Alterations in the p53 gene play an important role in the development of human lung cancer, occurring at an early stage in tumor development (12, 13, 14, 15) .

X-ray crystallographic structure of p53 shows that the central portion consists of three loops involved in DNA binding: a ß sandwich that serves as a scaffold for two large loops (L2 and L3) that interact with the minor grove; and a loop-sheet-helix motif that interacts with the major grove (16) . The loops are held together partly by a tetrahedraly coordinated zinc atom. Four amino acid residues are bound to the zinc atom: Cys-176 and His-179 (L2 loop); and Cys-238 and Cys-242 (L3 loop). Most of the mutations are located within this central DNA-binding domain (residues 102–292) of p53 and are particularly common in the four highly conserved domains in this region. Lung cancer studies indicate that 10–20% of the mutations occur outside exons 5–8, mainly in exon 4 (17 , 18) . Missense mutations are the most common (about 90%; Ref. 9 ).

Several reports have studied the association between p53 mutations and prognosis in NSCLC, but the results are still controversial (19 , 20) . However, only a few lung cancer studies have analyzed mutations and prognosis in relation to affected exons and domains. One study reports that p53 mutations in exon 8 correlated most strongly with survival (21) . There is also an observation indicating that mutations in exon 5 are associated with poor prognosis (22) . To clarify this further, we have, through an extensive analysis of exons 4–9 and relevant clinical-pathological information, focused on the prognostic role of p53 mutations at different locations in defined structural and functional domains.


    PATIENTS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Patients.
This prospective study includes lung cancer patients admitted to the university hospital surgery departments of The Norwegian National Hospital and Haukeland Hospital from 1988–1996. Patients were selected consecutively as often as practicably possible, whenever sufficient tumor tissue was available for DNA analysis in addition to the amount required for histopathological examination. Only patients (148 subjects) with histologically confirmed NSCLC participated in the study. Informed consent was obtained from the patients. They had no earlier malignancies. No adjuvant therapy was given, except for one patient who received postsurgical radiation therapy.

The patients were in clinical stage I (68%), stage II (25%), stage IIIA (13%), and stage IIIB (3%) at the time of surgery. Patient and tumor characteristics are listed in Table 1Citation . Information on tobacco consumption and other clinical data were obtained from a questionnaire from the patient and the treating physician before surgery. The hospital records were reviewed with regard to clinical information, without knowledge of the p53 status of the tumors. The following information was recorded: (a) revealing symptoms; (b) history of cardiovascular disease; (c) pulmonary function status; (d) surgery procedure; (e) primary adjuvant therapy, including radiotherapy; and (f) date of death. All patients were traced in the National Register and The National Bureau of Statistics until the end of 1997 for date of death, whenever this information was unavailable from hospital records. Median follow-up time was 35 months. For survival analysis, the outcomes were divided into three categories: (a) death caused by lung cancer; (b) death from other causes without signs of relapse; and (c) still alive on December 31, 1997. These clinical data were analyzed together with the prospectively recorded data shown in Table 1Citation .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Patient and tumor characteristics, related to the presence or absence of p53 mutations

 
Tumor Classification.
The tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging and clinical staging were assessed from surgery and pathology reports according to the postsurgical pathological international grading system adopted by the International Union against Cancer and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (23 , 24) . The histopathological features of the surgical specimens listed in Table 1Citation were classified by two of us (V. S. and A. O. M.) according to the WHO criteria (25) . Adenosquamous carcinomas were assigned to either the SCC or AC group, according to the prevailing histological component.

Tumor Specimens and DNA Extraction.
Tumor tissue was collected at the time of surgery and cut into pieces. One piece was fixed in 4% buffered formalin for histopathological examination; an adjacent piece was snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C until cut on a microtome and evaluated by light microscopy, ensuring that only tissue with more than 80% tumor cells was used for further DNA extraction.

p53 Mutational Analysis.
Tumor DNA was screened for mutations in exons 4–9 by a modified single-strand conformational polymorphism method (17) and/or by chemical cleavage using fluorescence-labeled primers and capillary electrophoresis (ABI Prism 310) essentially as described by Verpy et al. (26) . Samples with aberrantly migrating bands in the screening step were sequenced as described previously (17) .

Statistical Analysis.
Comparison between different groups was made using the {chi}2 test. For analysis of lung cancer-related survival, Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed. The equality of survival curves for different subgroups was evaluated by use of the log-rank method. All Ps were estimated from two-sided statistical tests. Relative hazards of dying from lung cancer were estimated by use of Cox’s proportional hazards model. In the multivariate models, the following features were taken into consideration: (a) age at surgery; (b) tumor and node status; (c) tobacco consumption; (e) histopathological features; (f) distribution of mutations along exons; and (g) functional or structural domains of DNA binding sites of the p53 protein. For lung cancer-related survival analysis, death from lung cancer was considered to be the event of interest, and all other deaths were treated as censoring points. For overall survival, all causes of death were included in the analysis. This study refers to lung cancer-related survival unless otherwise stated. Statistical analysis was carried out using the statistical software program package SPSS for Microsoft Windows version 6.0.


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Of 148 NSCLC patients, 83 (54%) had p53 mutations within exons 4–9. In one tumor, there were two missense mutations. The p53 status in relation to clinicopathological information for these cases is shown in Table 1Citation . A higher frequency of p53 mutations was found among men (60%) than among women (35%), and p53 mutations were seen more frequently in SCC (67%) than in AC (44%) and large cell carcinoma (57%).

Seventy-three (88%) of the mutations were within exons 5–8, and 10 (12%) of the mutations were within exons 4 and 9. The highest mutational frequencies were found in exons 5, 7, and 8 (33%, 22%, and 27%, respectively). The p53 mutation spectrum is illustrated in Fig. 1Citation . Both the frequency and distribution of p53 mutations in NSCLC are in line with most previous lung cancer studies. Among the 84 mutations identified, 56 (67%) were missense mutations, 25 (30%) were null mutations including 8 (10%) nonsense (stop) mutations, 13 (15%) frameshift mutations (of which 9 were deletions, and 4 were insertions) and 5% splice site mutations. We identified 42 of 64 (66%) transversions and 22 of 64 (34%) transitions. G to T transversions were observed in 24 (38%) of the cases in this cohort, and G to A transitions were observed in 10 (16%) of the cases in this cohort. Of 80 patients with mutations affecting the coding region, 42 (53%) had mutations in conserved regions I-V of the gene. In the zinc-binding loops L2 and L3 of the p53 protein, the number of mutations was 13 (16%) and 14 (18%), respectively. Five patients had mutations in the H2 {alpha}-helix, and 11 patients had mutations in the S10 domain (of which six patients had mutations at residues 271–274). Furthermore, our analysis identified 10 mutations in four codons (codons 241, 248, 273, and 280) of the seven codons related to amino acids important in direct DNA binding (codons 120, 241, 248, 273, 276, 280, and 283).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Distribution of p53 mutations in tumors of NSCLC patients. The relationship to structural and conserved regions in the core domains and the relationship to exons 4–9 were analyzed in this study.

 
The lung cancer-related survival analysis included 80 NSCLC patients with p53 mutations affecting the coding region and 68 patients with wt p53. The major significant predictors for poor survival in the proportional hazards regression analysis were tumor size (T2 and T3 compared to T1), nodal status (N2 compared to N0), and age above 60 years at the time of surgery, notably among those patients with SCC (Table 2)Citation . Overall survival was also reduced across all stages (HR = 1.69; 95% CI, 1.06–2.70), and the main predictors for overall survival were also tumor size and nodal status (data not shown). As shown by the Cox regression model, survival was not significantly associated with smoking habits, pulmonary ventilation capacity, airway obstruction, coexisting cardiovascular disease, tumor location (left/right), or whether or not there were revealing symptoms before the surgical procedure.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Multivariate Cox regression analysis predicting lung cancer-related survival of 148 patients treated by surgery for NSCLC

 
Univariate analysis showed poorer lung cancer-related survival for patients with p53 mutations across all clinical stages. This was particularly evident for patients with mutations in exon 8, whereas for exon 9, the numbers were too low for evaluation. Kaplan-Meier survival estimate curves for lung cancer-related survival in patients with and without p53 mutations and for locations of these mutations within exons are depicted in Fig. 2Citation . In the multivariate model, patients with mutations in the p53 gene had poor survival compared with patients without wt p53: the HR for dying from lung cancer was 2.09 (95% CI, 1.20–3.64). As shown in Table 2Citation , the HR was even more pronounced for patients with mutations in exon 8 (HR = 3.50; 95% CI, 1.59–7.71). No significant differences were observed in survival for patients with mutations in exons 5 and 7 compared to those with wt p53. Among patients with missense mutations, the HR was 2.00 (95% CI, 1.10–3.63), whereas for patients with null mutations (i.e., stop, frameshift, and splice site mutations), the corresponding figure was 2.34 (95% CI, 1.14–4.79). Among the histopathological subtypes, SCC had a significantly increased HR only for mutations in exon 8 (HR = 3.19; 95% CI, 1.07–9.45).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. Kaplan-Meier lung cancer-related survival curves for NSCLC patients in clinical stage I–IIIB according to p53 status. A, patients (n = 84) with p53 mutations in exons 4–9 (p53 mutant) and patients (n = 64) with wt p53. Patients with mutations had significantly worse survival (P = 0.022). B, patients with mutations classified according to location within exons 4–8. Patients with mutations in exon 8 had significantly worse survival than those with wt p53 (P = 0.016). Exon 9 is omitted due to the small number of patients in the group.

 
Mutations in defined domains of the p53 gene are clearly related to an increased risk of dying from lung cancer-related disease. The HRs for mutations involving the L2 loop and the L2 + L3 loops together were 3.97 (95% CI, 1.51–10.45) and 2.36 (95% CI, 1.18–4.74), respectively. There was no increased risk associated with mutations in the L3 loop. The most severe effect on survival was shown for mutations located in the codons involved in the binding of the zinc atom (HR = 11.7; 95% CI, 3.6–38.7).

For prognostic evaluation, p53 mutations have been classified into groups according to possible biological functions (27) : (a) severe flexible mutants and severe contact mutants; (b) scrambled mutants; and (c) mild contact mutants and mild flexible mutants (see Table 3Citation ). The group of severe flexible mutants and severe contact mutants was significantly related to reduced survival (HR = 4.16; 95% CI, 1.93–8.97).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3 Cox regression analysis of lung cancer-related survival by distribution of mutations within various domains of the p53 gene

 
The analysis of overall survival for the variables above gave results that were similar to those for lung cancer disease-free survival, although slightly less significant.


    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Clinical parameters such as tumor size and lymph node status have been used to characterize lung cancer phenotypes in relation to prognosis. We confirm in this study that tumor size and nodal status are important predictors for both overall and lung cancer-related survival, which again correlates with clinical stage. An independent factor for poor prognosis was also age > 60 years at the time of surgery. However, it is important to establish prognostic factors that will define subgroups of patients.

In this study, the mutations in p53 were identified by sequencing all samples that had aberrant migration bands detected by the modified single-strand conformational polymorphism and/or chemical cleavage method. They both detect nearly all p53 mutations (17) . p53 mutations were detected in 54% of the specimens examined, and a predominance of G to T transversions were observed (31% of all mutations).

We present data consistent with previous studies in which mutations in p53 were found to be a strong and independent prognostic factor in lung cancer (18 , 19 , 28 , 29) , although these findings were not confirmed by others (21) . Regions outside exons 5–8 were sequenced in only one of these studies (19) . In the present study, significantly poorer prognosis was observed for p53 mutations within exon 8 in SCC. This observation is in line with a previous study (21) . Furthermore, we found that patients with mutations in exon 5, 6, and 7 had about the same survival rate. We could not confirm the results from a recent study demonstrating exon 5 mutations as an independent significant poor prognostic factor in NSCLC (22) . In that study, the p53 mutation frequency was only 21%.

Missense mutations have been reported to be associated with poor lung cancer-related survival in clinical stage I patients, as shown by analysis of Kaplan-Meier survival plots (18) . Our Cox regression model, with 67% of the patients in clinical stage I, did not show such an association. In contrast, it has been shown previously that null mutations are associated with poor lung cancer-related survival among patients mainly in clinical stage III (30) . In that study (30) , there was a low frequency of p53 mutations (25%) including null mutations (4%). Kaplan-Meier survival plots of our data also indicate that null mutations are significantly associated with poor prognosis for all stages combined (P = 0.03) and clinical stage I patients (P = 0.008) compared to patients without mutations. However, null mutations did not remain an independent prognostic factor in our multivariate analysis, whatever survival end point was considered.

Thirty-four percent of the p53 mutations occurred in the L2 and L3 domains. They interact to provide for DNA contacts and are partly held together by a zinc atom, thus playing an important role in DNA binding (31) . We show here for the first time that mutations occurring in these domains in NSCLC patients are clearly related to poor prognosis; the HR for mutations involving the L2 loop and the L2 + L3 loops together was 3.97 (95% CI, 1.51–10.45) and 2.36 (95% CI, 1.18–4.74), respectively. A novel finding was also that patients with mutations in the biologically functional domains of severe flexible and severe contact mutants had significantly reduced survival (HR = 4.16). Patients with mutations in the H2 {alpha}-helix did not have shorter survival, as was suggested in an earlier study (21) . Mutations affecting L2 and L3 have been observed in breast cancer patients with shortened survival (27) , and colorectal cancer mutations affecting L3 were also associated with increased risk of cancer-related death (32) . The most striking observation in the present study was a HR of 11.7 in patients with mutations affecting the four residues binding the zinc atom (codons 176, 179, 238, and 242) that bridges loops L2 and L3. These mutations may destabilize this portion of the DNA-protein binding domain and p53 functions, resulting in more aggressive tumors and shorter survival.

Several studies have examined p53 structure/function relationships. Both loss of normal function of wt p53 and gain of oncogenic properties of p53 may be possible reasons for decreased survival (33, 34, 35) . Hinds et al. (35) have shown that the mutant of codon 175 has biological properties (transformation frequency and transactivation) that differ from those of the mutant for codon 273. Replacement of cysteine with serine in the residue that binds zinc is shown to markedly reduce in vitro DNA binding, block transcription activation, and enhance transformation by p53 (36) . A recent study of p53 hot spot data supports the concept that within the conserved DNA binding region, there are amino acid residues and sequence motifs that are essential to p53 structure and function, and other sequences that are less critical (37) . It also appears that specific amino acid substitution may be important (38) . Because studies have shown that there are many different somatic p53 mutations that could have different functions, additional studies are required to clarify the mechanisms of mutant p53.

In conclusion, these results indicate that the p53 mutational status constitutes a prognostic factor that may provide a basis for prognostic evaluation and for stratifying patients biologically in future lung cancer studies.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Elin E. Thorner for excellent technical assistance. Anne Naalsund and Ketil Grong are acknowledged for valuable help in collecting clinical data, and Bjørn Møller is acknowledged for assistance in statistical analysis of the results.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported by The Norwegian Cancer Society. Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Toxicology, National Institute of Occupational Health, P. O. Box 8149 Dep, N-0033, Oslo, Norway. Phone: 47-23-19-51-00; Fax: 47-23-19-52-03; E-mail: vidar.skaug{at}stami.no Back

3 Present address: Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Telemark Central Hospital, N-3710 Skien, Norway. Back

4 The abbreviations used are: NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; AC, adenocarcinoma; wt, wild-type. Back

Received 7/30/99; revised 12/13/99; accepted 12/14/99.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Parkin D. M. Epidemiology of cancer: global patterns and trends. Toxicol. Lett., 102–103: 227-234, 1998.
  2. Parkin D. M. The global burden of cancer. Semin. Cancer Biol., 8: 219-235, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Peto R., Lopez A. D., Boreham J., Thun M., Heath C. J., Doll R. Mortality from smoking worldwide. Br. Med. Bull., 52: 12-21, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Kubik A., Plesko I., Reissigova J. Prediction of lung cancer mortality in four Central European countries, 1990–2009. Neoplasma (Bratisl.), 45: 60-67, 1998.
  5. Ikonen J. T., Salenius J. P., Ojala A., Mattila J., Riekkinen H., Wigren T. Prognosis of surgically treated lung cancer. Ann. Chir. Gynaecol., 88: 22-28, 1999.[Medline]
  6. Bunn P. A. J., Kelly K. New chemotherapeutic agents prolong survival and improve quality of life in non-small cell lung cancer: a review of the literature and future directions. Clin. Cancer Res., 4: 1087-1100, 1998.[Abstract]
  7. Ferrante K., Winograd B., Canetta R. Promising new developments in cancer chemotherapy. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., 43: S61-S68, 1999.
  8. Livingston R. B. Combined modality therapy of lung cancer. Clin. Cancer Res., 3: 2638-2647, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Greenblatt M., Bennett W., Hollstein M., Harris C. C. Mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene: clues to cancer etiology and molecular pathogenesis. Cancer Res., 54: 4855-4878, 1994.[Free Full Text]
  10. Sidransky D., Hollstein M. Clinical implications of the p53 gene. Annu. Rev. Med., 47: 285-301, 1996.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Levine A. J. p53, the cellular gatekeeper for growth and division. Cell, 88: 323-331, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Bennett W. P., Colby T. V., Travis W. D., Borkowski A., Jones R. T., Lane D. P., Metcalf R. A., Samet J. M., Takeshima Y., Gu J. R. p53 protein accumulates frequently in early bronchial neoplasia. Cancer Res., 53: 4817-4822, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Harris C. C. The 1995 Walter Hubert Lecture: molecular epidemiology of human cancer: insights from the mutational analysis of the p53 tumour-suppressor gene. Br. J. Cancer, 73: 261-269, 1996.[Medline]
  14. Lubin R., Zalcman G., Bouchet L., Tredanel J., Legros Y., Cazals D., Hirsch A., Soussi T. Serum p53 antibodies as early markers of lung cancer. Nat. Med., 1: 701-702, 1995.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Sozzi G., Miozzo M., Pastorino U., Pilotti S., Donghi R., Giarola M., De Gregorio L., Manenti G., Radice P., Minoletti F. Genetic evidence for an independent origin of multiple preneoplastic and neoplastic lung lesions. Cancer Res., 55: 135-140, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Cho Y., Gorina S., Jeffery P., Pavletich N. Crystal structure of a p53 tumor suppressor-DNA complex: understanding tumorigenic mutations. Science (Washington DC), 265: 346-355, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Kure E. H., Ryberg D., Hewer A., Phillips D. H., Skaug V., Baera R., Haugen A. p53 mutations in lung tumours: relationship to gender and lung DNA adduct levels. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 17: 2201-2205, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Tomizawa Y., Kohno T., Fujita T., Kiyama M., Saito R., Noguchi M., Matsuno Y., Hirohashi S., Yamaguchi N., Nakajima T., Yokota J. Correlation between the status of the p53 gene and survival in patients with stage I non-small cell lung carcinoma. Oncogene, 18: 1007-1014, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Fukuyama Y., Mitsudomi T., Sugio K., Ishida T., Akazawa K., Sugimachi K. K-ras and p53 mutations are an independent unfavourable prognostic indicator in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Br. J. Cancer, 75: 1125-1130, 1997.[Medline]
  20. Isobe T., Hiyama K., Yoshida Y., Fujiwara Y., Yamakido M. Prognostic significance of p53 and ras gene abnormalities in lung adenocarcinoma patients with stage I disease after curative resection. Jpn. J. Cancer Res., 85: 1240-1246, 1994.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Huang C., Taki T., Adachi M., Konishi T., Higashiyama M., Miyake M. Mutations in exon 7 and 8 of p53 as poor prognostic factors in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Oncogene, 16: 2469-2477, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Vega F. J., Iniesta P., Caldes T., Sanchez A., Lopez J. A., de Juan C., Diaz-Rubio E., Torres A., Balibrea J. L., Benito M. p53 exon 5 mutations as a prognostic indicator of shortened survival in non-small-cell lung cancer. Br. J. Cancer, 76: 44-51, 1997.[Medline]
  23. Mountain C. F., Dresler C. M. Regional lymph node classification for lung cancer staging. Chest, 111: 1718-1723, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Mountain C. F. Revisions in the International System for Staging Lung Cancer. Chest, 111: 1710-1717, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Anonymous. The World Health Organization Histological Typing of Lung Tumours, 2nd ed. Am. J. Clin. Pathol., 77: 123–136, 1982.
  26. Verpy E., Biasotto M., Brai M., Misiano G., Meo T., Tosi M. Exhaustive mutation scanning by fluorescence-assisted mismatch analysis discloses new genotype-phenotype correlations in angiodema. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 59: 308-319, 1996.[Medline]
  27. Borresen A. L., Andersen T. I., Eyfjord J. E., Cornelis R. S., Thorlacius S., Borg A., Johansson U., Theillet C., Scherneck S., Hartman S. TP53 mutations and breast cancer prognosis: particularly poor survival rates for cases with mutations in the zinc-binding domains. Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 14: 71-75, 1995.[Medline]
  28. Horio Y., Takahashi T., Kuroishi T., Hibi K., Suyama M., Niimi T., Shimokata K., Yamakawa K., Nakamura Y., Ueda R. Prognostic significance of p53 mutations and 3p deletions in primary resected non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res., 53: 1-4, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Mitsudomi T., Oyama T., Kusano T., Osaki T., Nakanishi R., Shirakusa T., Fukuyama Y. Mutations of the p53 gene as a predictor of poor prognosis in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 85: 2018-2023, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. de Anta J. M., Jassem E., Rosell R., Martinez-Roca M., Jassem J., Martinez-Lopez E., Monzo M., Sanchez-Hernandez J. J., Moreno I., Sanchez-Cespedes M. TP53 mutational pattern in Spanish and Polish non-small cell lung cancer patients: null mutations are associated with poor prognosis. Oncogene, 15: 2951-2958, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Hollstein M., Rice K., Greenblatt M. S., Soussi T., Fuchs R., Sorlie T., Hovig E., Smith-Sorensen B., Montesano R., Harris C. C. Database of p53 gene somatic mutations in human tumors and cell lines. Nucleic Acids Res., 22: 3551-3555, 1994.
  32. Børressen-Dale A., Lothe R., Meling G., Hainaut P., Rognum T., Skovlund E. TP53 and long-term prognosis in colorectal cancer: mutations in the L3 zinc-binding domain predict poor survival. Clin. Cancer Res., 4: 203-210, 1998.[Abstract]
  33. Dittmer D., Pati S., Zambetti G., Chu S., Teresky A. K., Moore M., Finlay C., Levine A. J. Gain of function mutations in p53. Nat. Genet., 4: 42-46, 1993.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Hann B. C., Lane D. P. The dominating effect of mutant p53. Nat. Genet., 9: 221-223, 1993.
  35. Hinds P. W., Finlay C. A., Quartin R. S., Baker S. J., Fearon E. R., Vogelstein B., Levine A. J. Mutant p53 DNA clones from human colon carcinomas cooperate with ras in transforming primary rat cells: a comparison of the "hot spot" mutant phenotypes. Cell Growth Differ., 1: 571-580, 1990.[Abstract]
  36. Rainwater R., Parks D., Anderson M. E., Tegtmeyer P., Mann K. Role of cysteine residues in regulation of p53 function. Mol. Cell. Biol., 15: 3892-3903, 1995.[Abstract]
  37. Walker D. R., Bond J. P., Tarone R. E., Harris C. C., Makalowski W., Boguski M. S., Greenblatt M. S. Evolutionary conservation and somatic mutation hotspot maps of p53: correlation with p53 protein structural and functional features. Oncogene, 18: 211-218, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Rodin S. N., Holmquist G. P., Rodin A. S. CpG transition strand asymmetry and hitch-hiking mutations as measures of tumorigenic selection in shaping the p53 mutation spectrum. Int. J. Mol. Med., 1: 191-199, 1998.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
H. Lind, P. O. Ekstrom, D. Ryberg, V. Skaug, T. Andreassen, L. Stangeland, A. Haugen, and S. Zienolddiny
Frequency of TP53 Mutations in Relation to Arg72Pro Genotypes in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2007; 16(10): 2077 - 2081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
A Psyrri, P Kountourakis, Z Yu, C Papadimitriou, S Markakis, R. Camp, T Economopoulos, and M. Dimopoulos
Analysis of p53 protein expression levels on ovarian cancer tissue microarray using automated quantitative analysis elucidates prognostic patient subsets
Ann. Onc., April 1, 2007; 18(4): 709 - 715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. Olivier, A. Langerod, P. Carrieri, J. Bergh, S. Klaar, J. Eyfjord, C. Theillet, C. Rodriguez, R. Lidereau, I. Bieche, et al.
The Clinical Value of Somatic TP53 Gene Mutations in 1,794 Patients with Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2006; 12(4): 1157 - 1167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Singhal, A. Vachani, D. Antin-Ozerkis, L. R. Kaiser, and S. M. Albelda
Prognostic Implications of Cell Cycle, Apoptosis, and Angiogenesis Biomarkers in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Review
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2005; 11(11): 3974 - 3986.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
C. Fouquet, M. Antoine, P. Tisserand, R. Favis, M. Wislez, F. Commo, N. Rabbe, M. F. Carette, B. Milleron, F. Barany, et al.
Rapid and Sensitive p53 Alteration Analysis in Biopsies from Lung Cancer Patients Using a Functional Assay and A Universal Oligonucleotide Array: A Prospective Study
Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2004; 10(10): 3479 - 3489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. L. Rose, A. D. Robertson, M. J. Goodheart, B. J. Smith, B. R. DeYoung, and R. E. Buller
The Impact of p53 Protein Core Domain Structural Alteration on Ovarian Cancer Survival
Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2003; 9(11): 4139 - 4144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
S. A. Ahrendt, Y. Hu, M. Buta, M. P. McDermott, N. Benoit, S. C. Yang, L. Wu, and D. Sidransky
p53 Mutations and Survival in Stage I Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results of a Prospective Study
J Natl Cancer Inst, July 2, 2003; 95(13): 961 - 970.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. Russo, M. Migliavacca, I. Zanna, M. R. Valerio, M. A. Latteri, N. Grassi, G. Pantuso, S. Salerno, G. Dardanoni, I. Albanese, et al.
p53 Mutations in L3-Loop Zinc-binding Domain, DNA-Ploidy, and S Phase Fraction Are Independent Prognostic Indicators in Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Study with a Five-Year Follow-Up
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2002; 11(11): 1322 - 1331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. D. Brundage, D. Davies, and W. J. Mackillop
Prognostic Factors in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer* : A Decade of Progress
Chest, September 1, 2002; 122(3): 1037 - 1057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. E. Buller, M. S. Shahin, J. P. Geisler, M. Zogg, B. R. De Young, and C. S. Davis
Failure of BRCA1 Dysfunction to Alter Ovarian Cancer Survival
Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2002; 8(5): 1196 - 1202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. P. Hussain, P. Amstad, K. Raja, M. Sawyer, L. Hofseth, P. G. Shields, A. Hewer, D. H. Phillips, D. Ryberg, A. Haugen, et al.
Mutability of p53 Hotspot Codons to Benzo(a)pyrene Diol Epoxide (BPDE) and the Frequency of p53 Mutations in Nontumorous Human Lung
Cancer Res., September 1, 2001; 61(17): 6350 - 6355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Skaug, V.
Right arrow Articles by Haugen, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Skaug, V.
Right arrow Articles by Haugen, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online