
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Clinical Trials |
Department of Medicine, Clinical Immunology Service, [P. B. C., A. N. D., L. W., P. O. L.], and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics [K. S. P.], Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021, and Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New York [D. M. M., W. B.H., C. Z., R. J. I.]
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1:80) in approximately 74% of patients, but
rarely induced IgG antibodies against GM2 (approximately 10% of
patients immunized; Ref. 3
). Although IgM antibodies are
potent mediators of CMC,4
we
hypothesized that the additional induction of an IgG response against
GM2 could result in a more pronounced clinical effect. However,
induction of IgG antibodies against carbohydrate antigens such as
gangliosides would require a TH epitope to
provide the appropriate signals for immunoglobulin class switching.
To address this issue, GM2 was conjugated to KLH, a carrier protein
known to provide T-cell help and administered with adjuvant QS21, a
saponin fraction extracted from the bark of the South American tree
Quillaja saponaria Molina (6)
. In two pilot
studies using GM2 doses of 70 µg, this formulation resulted in
high-titer IgG antibodies against GM2 (5
, 7)
. Both IgM and
IgG antibodies reacted with GM2+ tumor cells by
flow cytometry and induced complement-mediated lysis (8)
.
In these two trials, 32 (76%) of 42 patients developed IgG antibodies
against GM2 at titers
1:80 when doses of QS21
100 µg were used.
Thus, IgG antibodies could consistently be induced against GM2.
The objective of the current trial was to determine the minimal dose of GM2-KLH required for a consistent, high-titer IgM and IgG antibody response. This is one of the first dose-response studies carried out in patients receiving a defined cancer vaccine and identifies a dose that is appropriate for future Phase III trials.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In general, the vaccine was formulated in a single vial containing both GM2-KLH and QS21. However, a group of 10 patients immunized at the 30-µg dose level were immunized with GM2-KLH and QS21 vialed separately. For these patients, the GM2-KLH and QS21 were mixed by the pharmacist just prior to administration.
Patient Eligibility
Melanoma patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer
stage III or IV, or deep stage II (>4 mm), who were free of disease
after complete surgical resection were eligible. All of the pathology
was confirmed by the Memorial Hospital Pathology Department. In
general, patients were started on vaccine within 10 months of surgical
resection, but patients were still eligible even after 10 months if
their risk of relapse was felt to be >50%. All of the patients signed
written informed consent.
Patients were excluded if their Karnofsky performance status was <80, if they had received systemic therapy or radiotherapy within the previous 8 weeks, or if they had a medical condition that would make it difficult to complete the full course of vaccination or to respond immunologically to the vaccine. Women who were pregnant or breast-feeding were not eligible.
Treatment Plan
This trial was carried out under an IND from the United
States Food and Drug Administration. Within 4 weeks of starting
vaccinations, patients had a physical exam, chest X-ray or chest
CT, complete blood count, and comprehensive chemistry
screen. An electrocardiogram was required within 10
months of starting the study.
Vaccines were administered by the Clinical Immunology nurses (Clinical Immunology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center) as a s.c. injection (final volume, 0.75 ml). Vaccinations were administered on weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 12, 24, and 36.
This study was designed to compare the immunological effects of
different doses of GM2-KLH vaccine. Groups of 510 patients were
accrued to each of five vaccine dose levels in which the GM2-KLH
concentration was adjusted to deliver a GM2 dose of 1, 3, 10, 30, or 70
µg (Table 1)
. All of the vaccinations
contained 100 µg of QS21. Subsequently, the vaccine formulation was
changed so that the GM2-KLH and QS21 were prepared in separate vials
and mixed just prior to vaccine administration. Using this "two-vial
system," an additional 10 patients were immunized at the 30-µg dose
level.
|
1:80 observed at two
or more time points. The antibody titers plotted versus time were also analyzed as the AUC using Prism version 2.01 software (Graph Pad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA). The AUC of the antibody response was considered to represent the overall exposure to anti-GM2 IgG or IgM over time.
CMC Assay.
CMC assays were performed by the LDH release method
(Boehringer-Mannheim). SK-MEL31 (GM2-positive) or SK-MEL24
(GM2-negative) were plated in 96-well tissue culture plates and
incubated at 37°C in a humidified CO2
incubator. The medium was removed, and plain DMEM containing
human serum complement standard (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) was
added along with the pre- or postimmunization serum to be tested in
duplicate wells. The postimmunization serum tested was the serum sample
showing the highest IgM anti-GM2 titers for each patient. Both the
complement and serum were used at a final dilution of 1:10. In positive
control wells, 1% NP40 was added to measure maximal release. The plate
was returned to the incubator for 16 h. The supernatants were
removed and transferred to a 96-well ELISA plate for analysis. LDH
substrate/catalyst was added, and the plate was incubated in the dark
at 25°C for 20 min. The plate was read on a spectrophotometer at 492
nm. Each patients preimmune CMC reading served as the control for the
postimmune CMC result. Percent-specific lysis against each cell line
was calculated as follows:
![]() |
Clinical Evaluation.
Patients were evaluated clinically at Memorial Hospital on weeks
12, 24, and 36 and on three months after the 7th vaccination. A chest
X-ray, complete blood count, and comprehensive screening profile
were repeated at the time of the 5th and 7th vaccination; an
electrocardiogram was repeated at the time of the 7th vaccination.
Toxicity was scored using standard criteria (10)
.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
1:40) for IgM and IgG at each of the dose levels, we found no
difference for the IgM response (P = 0.73;
2) or IgG response (P = 0.19;
2). From the exploratory analysis, it appeared
that there were fewer IgG responses at the 1-µg dose level.
|
|
Fig. 3
illustrates the median anti-GM2
IgM and IgG titers for patients immunized at the 3-, 10-, 30-, and
70-µg dose levels. At these four dose levels, there was a consistent
IgM response followed by an IgG response. Both the IgM and IgG
responses were sustained for months after the final immunization. At
week 60 (51/2 months after the last immunization), serum was
available on 20 patients who had developed an IgM response and 19
patients who had developed an IgG response. Analysis of these sera
showed that the IgM response persisted in 45% of the cases; the IgG
response persisted in 53% of the cases (data not shown). This
demonstrates that, in one-half of the patients who developed anti-GM2
antibodies, the antibody response persisted for at least 51/2
months.
|
|
1:640 as opposed to only two
of nine patients without CMC activity (P = 0.002;
Fishers exact test).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This is one of the first cancer vaccine trials to explore dose-response effects using a defined antigen. Our previous trials used GM2-KLH at a GM2 dose of 70 µg and demonstrated that all of the patients developed IgM anti-GM2 and 76% developed IgG anti-GM2. In this current trial, we have explored GM2 doses of 1, 3, 10, 30, and 70 µg. We conclude that the immunogenicity of GM2-KLH at a GM2 dose of 1 µg is suboptimal based on the fact that the 1-µg dose was less likely to induce IgG anti-GM2 antibodies. The mean AUC for the anti-GM2 IgM antibody responses was also lowest for the 1-µg dose level, which implies that this dose resulted in the lowest level of tumor-cell exposure to anti-GM2 antibody. At the higher vaccine doses (3, 10, 30, or 70 µg), there was no apparent difference in the immunogenicity of the vaccine. Peak titers, AUC, antibody responses over 60 weeks, and percent of nonresponding patients were similar at the 3-, 10-, 30-, and 70-µg dose levels.
In patients immunized at the 30-µg dose level, 50% of the patients
developed antibodies that fixed complement and resulted in CMC against
GM2+ melanoma. CMC activity correlated with peak
IgM anti-GM2 titers
1:640. This demonstrates that immunization
induced anti-GM2 antibodies capable of binding cell-surface GM2 and
mediating effector functions.
In at least one-half of the patients, the anti-GM2 antibody response persisted for more than 51/2 months. This is consistent with the notion that the KLH carrier protein provides sufficient T-cell help to induce a more prolonged antibody response against GM2. It is also important to note that patients at the 70-µg dose level received a 23-fold higher KLH dose compared with patients at the 3-µg dose level, and that this was not associated with any excessive toxicity or decreased immunogenicity. This is reassuring as we consider construction of multivalent vaccines containing 4 or 5 antigens conjugated to KLH. Our results suggest that these higher total KLH doses will neither be more toxic nor lead to diminished immunogenicity.
These studies provide a basis for additional trials with GM2-KLH +
QS21. Future clinical trials will examine the effects of IFN-
on the
anti-GM2 response induced by GM2-KLH + QS21, the immunogenicity of
GM2-KLH + QS21 combined with GD2-KLH, and a Phase III trial comparing
GM2-KLH + QS21 to IFN-
for the ability to prevent recurrence of
melanoma in stage III patients. For these trials, a vaccine dose
3
µg of GM2 should be used.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported by National Cancer Institute Grant PO1
CA33049. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue,
New York, NY 10021. Phone: (212) 639-5015; Fax: (212) 794-4352. ![]()
3 P. O. L. is a paid consultant and a
shareholder in Progenics Pharmaceuticals. ![]()
4 The abbreviations used are: CMC,
complement-mediated cytotoxicity; KLH, keyhole limpet hemocyanin; AUC,
area under curve, LDH; lactate dehydrogenase. ![]()
Received 12/16/98; revised 8/23/99; accepted 12/13/99.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. J. Sabbatini, G. Ragupathi, C. Hood, C. A. Aghajanian, M. Juretzka, A. Iasonos, M. L. Hensley, M. K. Spassova, O. Ouerfelli, D. R. Spriggs, et al. Pilot Study of a Heptavalent Vaccine-Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin Conjugate plus QS21 in Patients with Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Peritoneal Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2007; 13(14): 4170 - 4177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Sabbatini and K. Odunsi Immunologic Approaches to Ovarian Cancer Treatment J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2007; 25(20): 2884 - 2893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-O. Sadoulet, C. Franceschi, M. Aubert, F. Silvy, J.-P. Bernard, D. Lombardo, and E. Mas Glycoengineering of {alpha}Gal xenoantigen on recombinant peptide bearing the J28 pancreatic oncofetal glycotope Glycobiology, June 1, 2007; 17(6): 620 - 630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Yin, A. Hashimoto, M. Izawa, K. Miyazaki, G.-Y. Chen, H. Takematsu, Y. Kozutsumi, A. Suzuki, K. Furuhata, F.-L. Cheng, et al. Hypoxic culture induces expression of sialin, a sialic Acid transporter, and cancer-associated gangliosides containing non-human sialic Acid on human cancer cells. Cancer Res., March 15, 2006; 66(6): 2937 - 2945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Lewis Therapeutic cancer vaccines: Using unique antigens PNAS, October 5, 2004; 101(suppl_2): 14653 - 14656. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Krug, G. Ragupathi, C. Hood, M. G. Kris, V. A. Miller, J. R. Allen, S. J. Keding, S. J. Danishefsky, J. Gomez, L. Tyson, et al. Vaccination of Patients with Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Synthetic Fucosyl GM-1 Conjugated to Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2004; 10(18): 6094 - 6100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Krug, G. Ragupathi, K. K. Ng, C. Hood, H. J. Jennings, Z. Guo, M. G. Kris, V. Miller, B. Pizzo, L. Tyson, et al. Vaccination of Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Polysialic Acid or N-Propionylated Polysialic Acid Conjugated to Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2004; 10(3): 916 - 923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. K. Ko, K. Kawano, J. L. Murray, M. L. Disis, C. L. Efferson, H. M. Kuerer, G. E. Peoples, and C. G. Ioannides Clinical Studies of Vaccines Targeting Breast Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2003; 9(9): 3222 - 3234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Kirkwood, J. G. Ibrahim, J. A. Sosman, V. K. Sondak, S. S. Agarwala, M. S. Ernstoff, and U. Rao High-Dose Interferon Alfa-2b Significantly Prolongs Relapse-Free and Overall Survival Compared With the GM2-KLH/QS-21 Vaccine in Patients With Resected Stage IIB-III Melanoma: Results of Intergroup Trial E1694/S9512/C509801 J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2001; 19(9): 2370 - 2380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. B. Chapman, D. Morrisey, K. S. Panageas, L. Williams, J. J. Lewis, R. J. Israel, W. B. Hamilton, and P. O. Livingston Vaccination with a Bivalent GM2 and GD2 Ganglioside Conjugate Vaccine: A Trial Comparing Doses of GD2-Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2000; 6(12): 4658 - 4662. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |