Clinical Cancer Research Meeting Calendar AACR Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salonga, D.
Right arrow Articles by Danenberg, P. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Salonga, D.
Right arrow Articles by Danenberg, P. V.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 6, 1322-1327, April 2000
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research


Clinical Trials

Colorectal Tumors Responding to 5-Fluorouracil Have Low Gene Expression Levels of Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase, Thymidylate Synthase, and Thymidine Phosphorylase1

Dennis Salonga, Kathleen D. Danenberg, Martin Johnson, Ralf Metzger, Susan Groshen, Denice D. Tsao-Wei, Heinz-Josef Lenz, C. Gail Leichman, Lawrence Leichman, Robert B. Diasio and Peter V. Danenberg2

University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90033 [D. S., K. D. D., R. M., S. G., D. D. T-W., H-J. L., C. G. L., L. L., P. V. D.], and the Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama 35294 [M. J., R. B. D.]


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
We had previously shown that high gene expressions (mRNA levels) of thymidylate synthase (TS; Leichman et al., J. Clin. Oncol., 15: 3223–3229, 1997) and thymidine phosphorylase (TP; Metzger et al., Clin. Cancer Res., 4: 2371–2376, 1998) in pretreatment tumor biopsies could identify tumors that would be nonresponsive to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based therapy. In this study, we investigated the association between intratumoral gene expression of the pyrimidine catabolism enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) and the response of colorectal tumors to the same 5-FU-based protocol. DPD expressions were measured by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR in 33 pretreatment biopsies of colorectal tumors from patients who went on to receive treatment with 5-FU and leucovorin (LV). The range of DPD gene expression in those tumors that were nonresponsive to 5-FU was much broader than that of the responding tumors. None of the tumors with basal-level DPD expressions above a DPD:ß-actin ratio of 2.5 x 10-3 (14 of 33) were responders to 5-FU/LV therapy, whereas those tumors with DPD gene expressions below DPD:ß-actin ratio of 2.5 x 10-3 had a response rate of 50%. There was no correlation among DPD, TS, and TP expression values in this set of colorectal tumors, which indicated that these gene expressions are independent variables. All of the tumors that responded to 5-FU therapy (11 of 33) had expression values of all three of the genes, TS, TP, and DPD, below their respective nonresponse cutoff values, whereas, in each of the nonresponding tumors, at least one of these gene expressions was high. The patients with low expression of all three of the genes had significantly longer survival than patients with a high value of any one of the gene expressions. The results of this study show that intratumoral gene expression level of DPD is associated with tumor response to 5-FU and that the use of more than one independent determinant of response permits the identification of a high percentage of responding patients.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
5-FU3 has been used for more than 40 years for the treatment of various cancers and remains the standard first-line treatment for colorectal cancer, although the response rate as a single agent is usually less than 20% (1) . Over the years, various strategies have been attempted to increase the antitumor efficacy of 5-FU by modulation of its intracellular metabolism and biochemistry (2) . We have been pursuing another approach for improving therapy with 5-FU by identifying the biochemical response determinants of this drug. If such determinants could be measured in tumors before treatment, patients who are judged unlikely to respond to 5-FU would then have the option to be treated, instead, with another agent to which they might respond, whereas those patients with favorable 5-FU response indices could anticipate a higher than average probability of response. We had previously found that the intratumoral levels of expression of the mRNA for the 5-FU target enzyme TS (3) and the catabolic enzyme TP (4) were predictors of the sensitivity of colorectal tumors to 5-FU-based protocols. TS and TP expression values that were above a certain threshold identified a subset of tumors not responding to 5-FU, whereas expression values below the nonresponse cutoff value number predicted an appreciably higher response rate but did not specifically identify responding tumors. However, we also noted that tumors with both low TS and low TP had a higher response rate than tumors with only one or the other gene expression being low (4) ; that is, by combining response determinants, it was possible to achieve a considerably better response prediction than with just one determinant. This observation suggested that, with yet a third independent response determinant, it might be possible to identify a set of tumors that would have a very high, if not 100%, response rate to 5-FU-based protocols.

In this study, we examined intratumoral DPD expression as a possible additional determinant of the response of colorectal tumors to 5-FU treatment. DPD reduces the 5,6 double bond of uracil (as well as that of 5-FU) and is the rate-limiting enzyme for 5-FU catabolism (5, 6, 7) . DPD activity is highly variable in normal tissues (8) and, thus, by sufficiently influencing the bioavailability of 5-FU, could affect its pharmacokinetics, toxicity, and antitumor activity. DPD levels not only vary among individuals but also within the same individual on a Circadian rhythm basis (9) . Patients with DPD levels within the normal range rapidly eliminate over 80% of administered 5-FU as 2-fluoro-ß-alanine, whereas patients who are deficient in DPD retain 5-FU over a much longer half-life and excrete mostly unchanged 5-FU in the urine (10) . In such patients, 5-FU can cause profound toxicity (11) . Because inactivation of 5-FU by DPD seemed to be a mechanism of clinical resistance to 5-FU, vigorous efforts have been made to design inhibitors of DPD. The most successful of these, 5-ethynyluracil, markedly improved the efficacy and therapeutic index of 5-FU in rats (12) . In addition to its role in normal tissue toxicity of 5-FU, DPD expression specifically in tumors has been studied as a possible determinant of tumor response to 5-FU. DPD expression is variable among tumors also, and, in head-and-neck tumors, DPD levels have been inversely associated with response to 5-FU (13) .

The above-cited studies, along with previous studies showing that DPD and TS levels both were significantly associated with sensitivity to 5-FU (14) , suggested to us that DPD expression could be a useful 5-FU response determinant in colorectal tumors along with TS and TP expression provided that: (a) intratumoral basal DPD level was associated with clinical efficacy of FU; (b) TS, TP, and DPD expressions were independent variables; and (c) there was sufficient variation among individuals in the expression of this gene. Accordingly, we used quantitative RT-PCR to measure DPD expression (relative mRNA levels) in a group of 33 colorectal tumors in which we had already determined TS and TP expressions, and we correlated these expressions with response to 5-FU-based therapy.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Clinical Methods.
Eligibility criteria for these trial-and-tumor-response-evaluation parameters were described previously in detail (3) . In brief, eligible patients had (a) a diagnosis of disseminated or recurrent colorectal cancer with a measurable lesion accessible for biopsy; (b) a Southwest Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2 with adequate hematological, hepatic, and renal function; (c) no prior infusional 5-FU; and (d) a lesion that was bidimensionally measurable either by physical or radiological examination. After placement of an indwelling venous access, patients were treated with 5-FU (200 mg/m2/day) as a continuous infusion administered by ambulatory infusion pump (Pharmacia Deltec Cadd pump, Minneapolis, MN) with LV (20 mg/m2) by i.v. push weekly. The initial cycle was given for 4 weeks, followed by a 1-week rest, with subsequent cycles consisting of 3 weeks continuous therapy and a 1-week rest. Response rates and toxicity profiles for this regimen have been published previously (15) .

After two cycles (8 weeks) of treatment, measurable disease was reassessed. Response criteria were the standard definitions used for national cooperative group trials (16) . To be classified as a responder, a tumor had to have a 50% reduction in the sum of the products of the perpendicular diameters of the indicator lesion without growth of other disease or the appearance of new lesions. Those with responses or stable disease were continued on protocol until progression was documented.

Liver metastases represented the most common site of disease on which a biopsy was performed and assessed for response, whereas, in some cases, nodal metastases or peritoneal metastases were the disease sites evaluated. All of the specimens were obtained by core-needle biopsy. This technique uses a coaxial system in which fine-needle aspiration is used to confirm cytological evidence of cancer within moments of the aspiration. The fine needle is withdrawn from a sheath and a core needle is inserted through the sheath without losing position. The core-needle material is used for gene expression analysis. Specimens were examined by pathologists and were not used for analysis unless they were judged to consist of >80% tumor tissue.

Laboratory Methods.
The procedure for RT-PCR quantitation of gene expression has been described in detail previously (17 , 18) . In brief, the method involves isolation of mRNA from each tumor, preparation of cDNA using reverse transcriptase and random hexamers and PCR amplification of the specific cDNA of interest in a range of concentrations that gives rise to a linear curve of the resulting PCR products. An internal standard gene (for example, ß-actin) from the same cDNA solution is PCR-amplified separately. We found previously that with ß-actin as the reference gene, a good linearity is obtained between gene expression values determined by RT-PCR and protein content determined by immunohistochemistry (19) . Once the concentration ranges for linear amplification are established for the cDNA of the target gene and the reference gene, the ratio of the slopes generates an empirical number proportional to the amount of mRNA of interest in the tissue normalized to total RNA. Gene expression values are reported only if the PCR of serial dilutions of the cDNA solution generates a set of distinct bands with intensities that are linear with the concentration of cDNA. Slopes of the lines are obtained from at least three data points, so that each reported gene expression value represents the average of a minimum of three separate PCR reactions within the linear amplification range. When the initially chosen cDNA concentrations for a particular determination give PCR products clearly outside of the proportional linearity region, the determination is repeated with adjusted cDNA concentrations until the data points are in the linear range, and the correlation coefficient for linearity for a set of at least three consecutive serial dilutions plus the zero point is greater than 0.90. This method has been used by us (3 , 19) as well as by others (20) to quantitate various gene expressions in tumor biopsy specimens. Gene expression values are expressed as a ratio of PCR products of the gene of interest to that of the internal reference gene ß-actin.

For RT-PCR quantitation of DPD, the following primers were designed based on the sequence of the DPD gene (GenBank accession no. U20938): DPD-1740F, T7-GGTCTTGCTAGCGCAACTCC ("T7" designates the T7 RNA polymerase clamping sequence TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGAGA attached to the 5' end), and DPD-1989R, CCTTTAGTTCAGTGACACTTTGA. These primers were designed to give an amplicon of 250 bp, spanning positions 1740 to 1989 of the genomic sequence. ß-actin primers BA67 and BA68 were described previously (17) . The PCR reaction was performed as described previously (17 , 18) , except that cycling conditions were modified to be optimal for the DPD primers. The cycling conditions for DPD amplification were 15 s at 96°C, 30 s at 65°C, and 30 s at 72°C for 31 cycles.

Statistical Methods.
To evaluate the association of DPD with response and with survival, DPD was categorized into a low and a high value. To determine this cutoff value, the maximally selected {chi}2 method of Miller and Halpern (21 , 22) was adapted. For each observed DPD value, patients were classified as falling below or equal to that value, or above that value. The Pearson {chi}2 test statistic was used to compare the response rates of the two resulting groups of patients (below or equal to the value versus above the value). The DPD value that yielded the largest {chi}2 test statistic (the maximal {chi}2 statistic) was selected as the optimal cut-point. To determine the P-value associated with the maximal {chi}2 statistic, we performed 2000 bootstrap-like simulations. For each simulation, a randomly selected DPD value was drawn (with replacement) from the set of observed DPD values and assigned to each of the observed responses; the maximal {chi}2 test statistic was calculated based on this set of randomly matched DPD values and responses. The corrected P-value was calculated as the proportion of the 2000 simulated maximal statistics that was larger than the original maximal {chi}2 test statistic; the calculated corrected value was 0.033, compared with the uncorrected P of 0.0041. This analysis was repeated using the log-rank test to compare survival. For this analysis, the calculated corrected value was 0.03, compared with the uncorrected P of 0.0015. These corrected Ps account for the fact that all of the possible DPD values were examined before selecting the optimal cut-point. In both analyses, the optimal DPD cut-point was 2.5. The rest of the analysis was descriptive, and P-values were calculated to reflect the magnitude of associations rather than to perform formal testing. The cutoff values for TS and TP expressions were based on the highest level in the group of responders (therefore, no patient with a TS >= 4.1 or a TP >= 18 was a responder). To examine the joint association of TS, TP, and DPD with either response or survival, the 2x2x2 = 8 groups of patients were examined. The group of patients with TS <= 4, TP <= 18, and DPD <= 2.5, was the largest (n = 11 patients) and also identified a subset with a longer survival; the outcome of this subset was compared with the others. To evaluate the association with response, the two-sided Fisher’s exact test was used; the Spearman correlation was used to evaluate the association between DPD and TS; the log-rank test was used to measure the association between TS, TP, and DPD, and survival. The Ansari-Bradley test was used to compare the responders and nonresponders in terms of the variability of DPD gene expression (23) .


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Relative DPD mRNA content was determined by quantitative RT-PCR (17 , 18) in biopsy specimens from 33 colorectal cancer patients analyzed previously for TS expression levels (3) . Tumors were categorized as either responding or not responding to a regimen of 5-FU and LV (see "Materials and Methods" for definition of clinical response criteria). Fig. 1Citation shows the distributions of DPD:ß-actin PCR product ratios (henceforth termed "expressions" for convenience) for the two groups. The range of DPD expressions among the responding tumors was relatively narrow (0.60 x 10-3 to 2.5 x 10-3, 4.2-fold) compared with that of the nonresponders (0.2 x 10-3 to 16 x 10-3, 80-fold). This difference in the range of gene expression between the responding and nonresponding groups was significant (P = 0.019, Ansari-Bradley rank test), as was the lack of responding tumors with DPD expressions >2.5 x 10-3 (Table 1)Citation . A total of 22 tumors had DPD expressions < 2.5 x 10-3 with a corresponding response rate of 50% (11 of 22).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. DPD gene expressions in 33 colorectal tumors grouped according to response (>50% tumor shrinkage) or nonresponse (<50% tumor shrinkage).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Summary of response data for tumors with different expressions of DPD and TS genes

 
For tumor response prediction, it was of interest to determine the relationship between these gene expressions. For example, if TS and DPD were coregulated, there would be little or no additional benefit for response prediction from measuring two gene expressions, whereas if the genes were independently regulated, some portion of the low-TS patients might be identified as nonresponders by their high DPD expression. A plot of DPD against TS expressions (Fig. 2)Citation showed no correlation between the expressions of these genes (r2, 0.01), with a number of low-DPD tumors having high TS and high-TS tumors having low DPD expressions. As Fig. 3Citation further shows, only 1 of 12 tumors falling within the area designated by the nonresponse cutoff values of TS and DPD (i.e., having both low TS and low DPD) was a nonresponder to 5-FU/LV, but this one tumor (Fig. 3Citation , tumor 152) had a TP expression value above its cutoff. Thus, all of the responding tumors could be identified by low expression values of DPD, TS, and TP (Fig. 3)Citation . The response data are summarized in Table 1Citation .



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. DPD expressions plotted against TS expressions in the same set of 33 colorectal tumors. The values for TS expression were obtained from a previously published study (3) . The dotted lines indicate the nonresponse cutoff values for each gene expression.

 


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. DPD, TS, and TP expressions in tumors grouped according to response or no response to 5-FU treatment. The gene expression values shown on the ordinate were normalized with respect to the highest value on each group. The numbers on the X-axis are identification numbers for each of the tumor specimens.

 
Longer periods of survival have been observed for colorectal cancer patients whose tumors respond to chemotherapy (24) . In the present study also, survival for those patients with DPD values below the nonresponse threshold of DPD < 2.5 x 10-3 was significantly longer than for those patients with DPD above this value (Fig. 4Citation , upper panel). The greatest increase in survival was observed for the group of patients with all of the three genes, DPD, TS, and TP below the respective nonresponse cutoff values (Fig. 4Citation , lower panel).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 4. Survival (Kaplan-Meier) plots indicating probability of survival for patients with DPD expressions above or below the nonresponse cutoff [DPD:ß-actin = 2.5 x 10-3 (upper panel)]; and for patients with DPD, TS, and TP expressions either above or below their respective nonresponse cutoff values (DPD:ß-actin = 2.5 x 10-3; TS:ß-actin = 4.1 x 10-3; and TP:ß-actin = 18 x 10-3 (lower panel)].

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In this study, we have shown a significant correlation between DPD expression levels in colorectal tumors, response to 5-FU, and patient survival. The pattern of DPD expressions as a function of response or nonresponse resembled that of TS and TP expressions determined previously (3 , 4) in that: (a) the range of gene expressions among the nonresponders was considerably broader than among the responders; and (b) there was a cutoff value of DPD expression (DPD:ß-actin, 2.5 x 10-3) above which there were no 5-FU-responsive tumors, whereas the set of tumors with expressions below the cutoff value comprised both responders and nonresponders. Thus, low DPD expressions do not uniformly identify responding tumors but do predict a high response rate of 50%. However, because TS and DPD gene expressions are independently regulated (as indicated by the lack of correlation between them in Fig. 2Citation ), 10 of these low-DPD tumors could be positively identified as nonresponders by TS expression values >4.1 x 10-3 (the nonresponse cutoff value for TS expression). Thus, tumors having both TS < 4.1 x 10-3 and DPD < 2.5 x 10-2 in this group of patients had a 92% response rate. Adding TP expression as a third determinant allowed all of the responders in this group of tumors to be identified by low expression of all of the three genes (Fig. 3)Citation . These data show how combining more than one independent response determinant can increase predictive power for clinical outcome.

It is striking to see in Fig. 3Citation that the patterns of expression of TS, DPD, and TP vary over a wide range and are different in every one of the nonresponding tumors. This almost chaotic variation of gene expressions among the individual tumors of the nonresponding group compared with the responding group, suggests that the transition from a drug-sensitive tumor to one that is insensitive is accompanied or preceded by a substantial degradation of the ability of the tumor cells to regulate their gene expressions.

This study also shows that, because response of colorectal tumors to chemotherapy is associated with a significant survival benefit (24) , measuring these gene expressions not only can predict response to 5-FU but also can identify patients with a better survival prognosis. If these results can be confirmed in a clinical trial with a larger set of patients, data on TS, DPD, and TP expressions in tumors would permit more rational decisions on whether or not to proceed with 5-FU-based therapy as first-line treatment. If the 5-FU response indices seem unfavorable, the alternative drug CPT-11 is now available for treatment of colorectal cancer patients. Preliminary results show that tumors with TS expression levels that would put them into the group not expected to respond to 5-FU, or indeed have already been treated and have failed 5-FU, do respond to CPT-11 (25) . If patients destined for 5-FU failure can be identified before the start of treatment, benefits will of course be gained by avoiding the toxicity associated with the drug, but, moreover, it is possible that patients will be more likely to respond to CPT-11 when it is given as primary therapy, compared with its use after 5-FU failure. Thus, the assignment of patients for either 5-FU or CPT-11 treatment by taking into consideration their TS, DPD, or TP levels may provide a way of achieving a substantial increase in the overall response rate to chemotherapy using currently available agents.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported by USPHS Grants U01 CA 60108, RO1 CA 39629, RO1 CA60859, and P30 CA 14089. R. M. was supported by Dr. Mildred Scheel Stiftung, Bonn, Germany. Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center CRL-204, 1303 North Mission Road, Los Angeles, CA 90033. Phone: (213) 224-7788; Fax: (213) 224-7679; E-mail: pdanenbe{at}hsc.usc.edu Back

3 The abbreviations used are: 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; TS, thymidylate synthase; DPD, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase; LV, leucovorin; RT, reverse transcription; TP, thymidine phosphorylase. Back

Received 7/21/99; revised 1/12/00; accepted 1/19/00.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Moertel C. G. Chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. N. Engl. J. Med., 330: 1136-1142, 1994.[Free Full Text]
  2. Soros G. A., Grogan L. M., Allegra C. J. Preclinical and clinical aspects of biomodulation of 5-fluorouracil. Cancer Treat. Rev., 20: 11-49, 1994.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Leichman C. G., Lenz H-J., Leichman L., Danenberg K., Baranda J., Groshen S., Boswell W., Metzger R., Tan M., Danenberg P. V. Quantitation of intratumoral thymidylate synthase expression predicts for disseminated colorectal cancer response and resistance to protracted infusion 5-fluorouracil and weekly leucovorin. J. Clin. Oncol., 15: 3223-3229, 1997.[Abstract]
  4. Metzger R., Danenberg K. D., Leichman C. G., Salonga D., Schwartz E. L., Wadler S., Lenz H-J., Groshen S., Leichman L., Danenberg P. V. High basal level gene expression of thymidine phosphorylase (platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor) in colorectal tumors is associated with non-response to 5-fluorouracil. Clin. Cancer Res., 4: 2371-2376, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Naguib F. N. M., El Kouni A. M., Cha S. Enzymes of uracil catabolism in normal and neoplastic human tissues. Cancer Res., 45: 5405-5412, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Lu Z., Zhang R., Diasio R. B. Purification and characterization of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase from human liver. J. Biol. Chem., 267: 17102-17109, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Johnson M. R., Wang K., Tillmanns S., Albin N., Diasio R. B. Structural organization of the human dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene. Cancer Res., 57: 1660-1663, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Heggie D., Sommadossi J. P., Cross D. S., Huster W. J., Diasio R. B. Clinical pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil and its metabolites in plasma, urine, and bile. Cancer Res., 47: 2203-2206, 1987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Grem J. L., Yee L. K., Venzon D. J., Takimoto C. H., Allegra C. J. Inter- and intra-individual variation in dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., 40: 117-125, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Harris B. E., Song R., He Y. J., Soong S. J., Diasio R. B. Relationship between dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity and plasma drug levels in cancer patients receiving 5-fluorouracil by protracted continuous infusion. Cancer Res., 50: 197-201, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Lyss A. P., Lilenbaum R. C., Harris B. E., Diasio R. B. Severe 5-fluorouracil toxicity in a patient with decreased dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity. Cancer Investig., 11: 239-240, 1993.[Medline]
  12. Cao S., Rustum Y. M., Spector T. 5-Ethynyluracil modulation of the efficacy and therapeutic index in rats bearing advanced colorectal carcinoma. Cancer Res., 54: 1507-1510, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Etienne M. C., Cheradame S., Fischel J. L., Formento P., Dassonville O., Renee N., Schneider M., Thyss A., Demard F., Milano G. Response to fluorouracil therapy in cancer patients: the role of intratumoral dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity. J. Clin. Oncol., 13: 1663-1670, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Beck A., Etienne M. C., Cheradame S., Fischel J. L., Formento P., Renee N., Milano G. A role for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and thymidylate synthase in tumor sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil. Eur. J. Cancer, 30: 1517-1522, 1994.
  15. Leichman C. G., Leichman L., Spears C. P., Rosen P. J., Jeffers S., Groshen S. Prolonged continuous infusion of fluorouracil with weekly bolus leucovorin: a Phase II study in patients with disseminated gastrointestinal cancers. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 85: 41-44, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Green S., Weiss G. R. Southwest Oncology Group standard response criteria, endpoint definitions, and toxicity criteria. Investig. New Drugs, 10: 239-253, 1992.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Horikoshi T., Danenberg K. D., Stadlbauer T. H. W., Volkenandt M., Shea L. L. C., Aigner K., Gustavsson B., Leichman L., Frösing R., Ray M., Gibson N. W., Spears C. P., Danenberg P. V. Quantitation of thymidylate synthase, dihydrofolate reductase, and DT-diaphorase gene expression in human tumors using the polymerase chain reaction. Cancer Res., 52: 108-116, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Lenz H-J., Hill C., Danenberg K. D., Leichman L. L., Priest D. G., Danenberg P. V. Rapid quantitative PCR for determination of relative gene expressions in tissue specimens. PCR Methods Appl., 4: 305-309, 1995.[Medline]
  19. Johnston P. G., Lenz H-J., Leichman C. G., Danenberg K. D., Allegra C. J., Danenberg P. V., Leichman L. Thymidylate synthase gene and protein expression correlate and are associated with response to 5-fluorouracil in human colorectal and gastric tumors. Cancer Res., 55: 1407-1412, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Kuo, D. Y-S., Mallick, S., Shen, H-J., DeVictoria, C., Jones, J., Fields, A. L., Goldberg, G. L., Runowicz, C. D., and Horwitz, S. B. Clin. Cancer Res., 2: 1981–1992, 1996.
  21. Miller R., Siegmund D. Maximally selected {chi}2 statistics. Biometrics, 38: 1011-1016, 1982.[CrossRef]
  22. Halpern J. Maximally selected {chi}2 statistics for small samples. Biometrics, 38: 1017-1023, 1982.[CrossRef]
  23. Hoolander, M., and Wolfe, N. A. Statistical Methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1973.
  24. Graf W., Pählman L., Bergström R., Glimelius B. The relationship between an objective response to chemotherapy and survival in advanced colorectal cancer. Br. J. Cancer, 70: 559-563, 1994.[Medline]
  25. Saltz L., Danenberg K., Paty P., Kelsen D., Kemeny N., Salonga D., Park J. M., Danenberg P. High thymidylate synthase activity does not preclude activity of CPT-11 in colorectal cancer (CRC). Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol., 17: 1080 1998.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
C. Postma, M. Koopman, T. E. Buffart, P. P. Eijk, B. Carvalho, G. J. Peters, B. Ylstra, J. H. van Krieken, C. J. A. Punt, and G. A. Meijer
DNA copy number profiles of primary tumors as predictors of response to chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer
Ann. Onc., June 1, 2009; 20(6): 1048 - 1056.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
F. M. Muggia, G. J. Peters, and J. R. Landolph Jr.
XIII International Charles Heidelberger Symposium and 50 Years of Fluoropyrimidines in Cancer Therapy Held on September 6 to 8, 2007 at New York University Cancer Institute, Smilow Conference Center
Mol. Cancer Ther., May 1, 2009; 8(5): 992 - 999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
G. Lurje, P. C. Manegold, Y. Ning, A. Pohl, W. Zhang, and H.-J. Lenz
Thymidylate synthase gene variations: predictive and prognostic markers
Mol. Cancer Ther., May 1, 2009; 8(5): 1000 - 1007.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anticancer ResHome page
H. FURUSE, Y. HIRANO, M. HARADA, L. H. MING, T. AOKI, Y. KURITA, S. MUGIYA, T. USHIYAMA, and S. OZONO
Significance of 5-Fluorouracil-related Enzyme Activities in Predicting Sensitivity to 5-Fluorouracil in Bladder Carcinoma
Anticancer Res, April 1, 2009; 29(4): 1001 - 1008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anticancer ResHome page
K. HARADA, T. FERDOUS, Y. ITASHIKI, M. TAKII, T. MANO, Y. MORI, and Y. UEYAMA
Effects of Cepharanthine Alone and in Combination with Fluoropyrimidine Anticancer Agent, S-1, on Tumor Growth of Human Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Xenografts in Nude Mice
Anticancer Res, April 1, 2009; 29(4): 1263 - 1270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
A Kawahara, Y Akagi, S Hattori, T Mizobe, K Shirouzu, M Ono, T Yanagawa, M Kuwano, and M Kage
Higher expression of deoxyuridine triphosphatase (dUTPase) may predict the metastasis potential of colorectal cancer
J. Clin. Pathol., April 1, 2009; 62(4): 364 - 369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. R. Brody, T. Hucl, C. L. Costantino, J. R. Eshleman, E. Gallmeier, H. Zhu, M. S. van der Heijden, J. M. Winter, A. K. Wikiewicz, C. J. Yeo, et al.
Limits to Thymidylate Synthase and TP53 Genes as Predictive Determinants for Fluoropyrimidine Sensitivity and Further Evidence for RNA-Based Toxicity as a Major Influence
Cancer Res., February 1, 2009; 69(3): 984 - 991.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
T. Okabe, I. Okamoto, S. Tsukioka, J. Uchida, E. Hatashita, Y. Yamada, T. Yoshida, K. Nishio, M. Fukuoka, P. A. Janne, et al.
Addition of S-1 to the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Gefitinib Overcomes Gefitinib Resistance in Non-small cell Lung Cancer Cell Lines with MET Amplification
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2009; 15(3): 907 - 913.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
H. Ishihama, M. Chida, O. Araki, Y. Karube, N. Seki, M. Tamura, H. Umezu, K. Honma, N. Masawa, and S. Miyoshi
Comparison of 5-Fluorouracil-related Gene Expression Levels Between Adenocarcinomas and Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Lung
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2009; 39(1): 33 - 36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
W. L. Allen, V. M. Coyle, P. V. Jithesh, I. Proutski, L. Stevenson, C. Fenning, D. B. Longley, R. H. Wilson, M. Gordon, H.-J. Lenz, et al.
Clinical Determinants of Response to Irinotecan-Based Therapy Derived from Cell Line Models
Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2008; 14(20): 6647 - 6655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
L. N. Kaliberova, D. L. Della Manna, V. Krendelchtchikova, M. E. Black, D. J. Buchsbaum, and S. A. Kaliberov
Molecular chemotherapy of pancreatic cancer using novel mutant bacterial cytosine deaminase gene
Mol. Cancer Ther., September 1, 2008; 7(9): 2845 - 2854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
P. M. Wilson, W. Fazzone, M. J. LaBonte, J. Deng, N. Neamati, and R. D. Ladner
Novel opportunities for thymidylate metabolism as a therapeutic target
Mol. Cancer Ther., September 1, 2008; 7(9): 3029 - 3037.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
Y. Sakurai, I. Yoshida, S. Kamoshida, K. Inaba, J. Isogaki, Y. Komori, I. Uyama, and Y. Tsutsumi
Effects of Combined Administration of DPD-Inhibitory Oral Fluoropyrimidine, S-1, Plus Paclitaxel on Gene Expressions of Fluoropyrimidine Metabolism-Related Enzymes in Human Gastric Xenografts
Ann. Surg. Oncol., August 1, 2008; 15(8): 2301 - 2309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
R. C. Pezo, S. J. Gandhi, L. A. Shirley, R. G. Pestell, L. H. Augenlicht, and R. H. Singer
Single-Cell Transcription Site Activation Predicts Chemotherapy Response in Human Colorectal Tumors
Cancer Res., July 1, 2008; 68(13): 4977 - 4982.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
R. Soong, N. Shah, M. Salto-Tellez, B. C. Tai, R. A. Soo, H. C. Han, S. S. Ng, W. L. Tan, N. Zeps, D. Joseph, et al.
Prognostic significance of thymidylate synthase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and thymidine phosphorylase protein expression in colorectal cancer patients treated with or without 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy
Ann. Onc., May 1, 2008; 19(5): 915 - 919.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
T. Okabe, I. Okamoto, S. Tsukioka, J. Uchida, T. Iwasa, T. Yoshida, E. Hatashita, Y. Yamada, T. Satoh, K. Tamura, et al.
Synergistic antitumor effect of S-1 and the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor gefitinib in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines: role of gefitinib-induced down-regulation of thymidylate synthase
Mol. Cancer Ther., March 1, 2008; 7(3): 599 - 606.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
W. Krugluger, A. Brandstaetter, E. Kallay, J. Schueller, E. Krexner, S. Kriwanek, E. Bonner, and H. S. Cross
Regulation of Genes of the Circadian Clock in Human Colon Cancer: Reduced Period-1 and Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Transcription Correlates in High-Grade Tumors
Cancer Res., August 15, 2007; 67(16): 7917 - 7922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
S. Oie, M. Ono, H. Fukushima, F. Hosoi, H. Yano, Y. Maruyama, M. Kojiro, T. Terada, K. Hirano, M. Kuwano, et al.
Alteration of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase expression by IFN-{alpha} affects the antiproliferative effects of 5-fluorouracil in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells
Mol. Cancer Ther., August 1, 2007; 6(8): 2310 - 2318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. M. Layman, D. G. Thomas, K. A. Griffith, J. B. Smerage, M. A. Helvie, M. A. Roubidoux, K. M. Diehl, L. A. Newman, M. S. Sabel, J. A. Hayman, et al.
Neoadjuvant Docetaxel and Capecitabine and the Use of Thymidine Phosphorylase as a Predictive Biomarker in Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2007; 13(14): 4092 - 4097.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
P. J. O'Dwyer, S. G. Eckhardt, D. G. Haller, J. Tepper, D. Ahnen, S. Hamilton, A. B. Benson III, M. Rothenberg, N. Petrelli, H.-J. Lenz, et al.
Priorities in Colorectal Cancer Research: Recommendations From the Gastrointestinal Scientific Leadership Council of the Coalition of Cancer Cooperative Groups
J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2007; 25(16): 2313 - 2321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Del Rio, F. Molina, C. Bascoul-Mollevi, V. Copois, F. Bibeau, P. Chalbos, C. Bareil, A. Kramar, N. Salvetat, C. Fraslon, et al.
Gene Expression Signature in Advanced Colorectal Cancer Patients Select Drugs and Response for the Use of Leucovorin, Fluorouracil, and Irinotecan
J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2007; 25(7): 773 - 780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Q. An, P. Robins, T. Lindahl, and D. E. Barnes
5-Fluorouracil Incorporated into DNA Is Excised by the Smug1 DNA Glycosylase to Reduce Drug Cytotoxicity
Cancer Res., February 1, 2007; 67(3): 940 - 945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
T. Oguri, Y. Bessho, H. Achiwa, H. Ozasa, K. Maeno, H. Maeda, S. Sato, and R. Ueda
MRP8/ABCC11 directly confers resistance to 5-fluorouracil
Mol. Cancer Ther., January 1, 2007; 6(1): 122 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
K. W. Suh, J. H. Kim, D. Y. Kim, Y. B. Kim, C. Lee, and S. Choi
Which Gene is a Dominant Predictor of Response During FOLFOX Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, the MTHFR or XRCC1 Gene?
Ann. Surg. Oncol., November 1, 2006; 13(11): 1379 - 1385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
B. H. O'Neil and H. L. McLeod
Thymidine Phosphorylase and Capecitabine: A Predictive Marker for Therapy Selection?
J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2006; 24(25): 4051 - 4053.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
T. Liersch, C. Langer, B. M. Ghadimi, B. Kulle, D. E. Aust, G. B. Baretton, W. Schwabe, P. Hausler, H. Becker, and C. Jakob
Lymph Node Status and TS Gene Expression Are Prognostic Markers in Stage II/III Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Fluorouracil-Based Chemoradiotherapy
J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2006; 24(25): 4062 - 4068.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
N. J. Meropol, P. J. Gold, R. B. Diasio, M. Andria, M. Dhami, T. Godfrey, A. J. Kovatich, K. A. Lund, E. Mitchell, and R. Schwarting
Thymidine Phosphorylase Expression Is Associated With Response to Capecitabine Plus Irinotecan in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2006; 24(25): 4069 - 4077.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
V. Garcia, J. M. Garcia, C. Pena, J. Silva, G. Dominguez, A. Hurtado, I. Alonso, R. Rodriguez, M. Provencio, and F. Bonilla
Thymidylate synthase messenger RNA expression in plasma from patients with colon cancer: prognostic potential.
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2006; 12(7): 2095 - 2100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
N. E. Kemeny, D. Niedzwiecki, D. R. Hollis, H.-J. Lenz, R. S. Warren, M. J. Naughton, J. C. Weeks, E. R. Sigurdson, J. E. Herndon II, C. Zhang, et al.
Hepatic Arterial Infusion Versus Systemic Therapy for Hepatic Metastases From Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Trial of Efficacy, Quality of Life, and Molecular Markers (CALGB 9481)
J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2006; 24(9): 1395 - 1403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
H. L. Gomez, S. L. Santillana, C. S. Vallejos, R. Velarde, J. Sanchez, X. Wang, N. L. Bauer, R. D. Hockett, V. J. Chen, C. Niyikiza, et al.
A Phase II Trial of Pemetrexed in Advanced Breast Cancer: Clinical Response and Association with Molecular Target Expression
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2006; 12(3): 832 - 838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
C. H. Smorenburg, G. J. Peters, C. J. van Groeningen, P. Noordhuis, K. Smid, A. M. G. H. van Riel, W. Dercksen, H. M. Pinedo, and G. Giaccone
Phase II study of tailored chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer with either 5-fluouracil and leucovorin or oxaliplatin and irinotecan based on the expression of thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase
Ann. Onc., January 1, 2006; 17(1): 35 - 42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
C. Blanquicett, M. W. Saif, D. J. Buchsbaum, M. Eloubeidi, S. M. Vickers, D. C. Chhieng, M. D. Carpenter, J. C. Sellers, S. Russo, R. B. Diasio, et al.
Antitumor Efficacy of Capecitabine and Celecoxib in Irradiated and Lead-Shielded, Contralateral Human BxPC-3 Pancreatic Cancer Xenografts: Clinical Implications of Abscopal Effects
Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2005; 11(24): 8773 - 8781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. W. Saif, M. A. Eloubeidi, S. Russo, A. Steg, J. Thornton, J. Fiveash, M. Carpenter, C. Blanquicett, R. B. Diasio, and M. R. Johnson
Phase I Study of Capecitabine With Concomitant Radiotherapy for Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Expression Analysis of Genes Related to Outcome
J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2005; 23(34): 8679 - 8687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
G. M. Pitari, R. I. Baksh, D. M. Harris, P. Li, S. Kazerounian, and S. A. Waldman
Interruption of Homologous Desensitization in Cyclic Guanosine 3',5'-Monophosphate Signaling Restores Colon Cancer Cytostasis by Bacterial Enterotoxins
Cancer Res., December 1, 2005; 65(23): 11129 - 11135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. Langer, K. Specht, K. Becker, P. Ewald, M. Bekesch, M. Sarbia, R. Busch, M. Feith, H. J. Stein, J.-R. Siewert, et al.
Association of Pretherapeutic Expression of Chemotherapy-Related Genes with Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Barrett Carcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2005; 11(20): 7462 - 7469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
J. L. Westra, H. Hollema, M. Schaapveld, I. Platteel, K. A. Oien, W. N. Keith, R. Mauritz, G. J. Peters, C. H. C. M. Buys, R. M. W. Hofstra, et al.
Predictive value of thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase protein expression on survival in adjuvantly treated stage III colon cancer patients
Ann. Onc., October 1, 2005; 16(10): 1646 - 1653.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
K. Ohrling, D. Edler, M. Hallstrom, P. Ragnhammar, and H. Blomgren
Detection of Thymidylate Synthase Expression in Lymph Node Metastases of Colorectal Cancer Can Improve the Prognostic Information
J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2005; 23(24): 5628 - 5634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
W. L. Allen and P. G. Johnston
Role of Genomic Markers in Colorectal Cancer Treatment
J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2005; 23(20): 4545 - 4552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
L. Ricciardiello, C. Ceccarelli, G. Angiolini, M. Pariali, P. Chieco, P. Paterini, G. Biasco, G. N. Martinelli, E. Roda, and F. Bazzoli
High Thymidylate Synthase Expression in Colorectal Cancer with Microsatellite Instability: Implications for Chemotherapeutic Strategies
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2005; 11(11): 4234 - 4240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. Napieralski, K. Ott, M. Kremer, K. Specht, H. Vogelsang, K. Becker, M. Muller, F. Lordick, U. Fink, J. Rudiger Siewert, et al.
Combined GADD45A and Thymidine Phosphorylase Expression Levels Predict Response and Survival of Neoadjuvant-Treated Gastric Cancer Patients
Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2005; 11(8): 3025 - 3031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
E. A. Kidd, J. Yu, X. Li, W. D. Shannon, M. A. Watson, and H. L. McLeod
Variance in the Expression of 5-Fluorouracil Pathway Genes in Colorectal Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2005; 11(7): 2612 - 2619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
B. M. Ghadimi, M. Grade, M. J. Difilippantonio, S. Varma, R. Simon, C. Montagna, L. Fuzesi, C. Langer, H. Becker, T. Liersch, et al.
Effectiveness of Gene Expression Profiling for Response Prediction of Rectal Adenocarcinomas to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy
J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2005; 23(9): 1826 - 1838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. Yu, W. D. Shannon, M. A. Watson, and H. L. McLeod
Gene Expression Profiling of the Irinotecan Pathway in Colorectal Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2005; 11(5): 2053 - 2062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Michael and M.M. Doherty
Tumoral Drug Metabolism: Overview and Its Implications for Cancer Therapy
J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2005; 23(1): 205 - 229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
P. Noordhuis, U. Holwerda, C. L. Van der Wilt, C. J. Van Groeningen, K. Smid, S. Meijer, H. M. Pinedo, and G. J. Peters
5-Fluorouracil incorporation into RNA and DNA in relation to thymidylate synthase inhibition of human colorectal cancers
Ann. Onc., July 1, 2004; 15(7): 1025 - 1032.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
T. A. Rich, R. C. Shepard, and S. T. Mosley
Four Decades of Continuing Innovation With Fluorouracil: Current and Future Approaches to Fluorouracil Chemoradiation Therapy
J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2004; 22(11): 2214 - 2232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. Boyer, E. G. McLean, S. Aroori, P. Wilson, A. McCulla, P. D. Carey, D. B. Longley, and P. G. Johnston
Characterization of p53 Wild-Type and Null Isogenic Colorectal Cancer Cell Lines Resistant to 5-Fluorouracil, Oxaliplatin, and Irinotecan
Clin. Cancer Res., March 15, 2004; 10(6): 2158 - 2167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T.-L. Wang, L. A. Diaz Jr., K. Romans, A. Bardelli, S. Saha, G. Galizia, M. Choti, R. Donehower, G. Parmigiani, I.-M. Shih, et al.
Digital karyotyping identifies thymidylate synthase amplification as a mechanism of resistance to 5-fluorouracil in metastatic colorectal cancer patients
PNAS, March 2, 2004; 101(9): 3089 - 3094.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
K.-H. Chi, H.-E. Wang, Y.-S. Wang, S.-L. Chou, H.-M. Yu, Y.-H. Tseng, I.-M. Hwang, and W.-Y. Lui
Antisense Thymidylate Synthase Electrogene Transfer to Increase Uptake of Radiolabeled Iododeoxyuridine in a Murine Model
J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2004; 45(3): 478 - 484.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
H. Seeliger, M. Guba, G. E. Koehl, A. Doenecke, M. Steinbauer, C. J. Bruns, C. Wagner, E. Frank, K.-W. Jauch, and E. K. Geissler
Blockage of 2-Deoxy-D-Ribose-Induced Angiogenesis with Rapamycin Counteracts a Thymidine Phosphorylase-Based Escape Mechanism Available for Colon Cancer under 5-Fluorouracil Therapy
Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2004; 10(5): 1843 - 1852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. Popat, A. Matakidou, and R. S. Houlston
Thymidylate Synthase Expression and Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2004; 22(3): 529 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. G. Azrak, S. Cao, H. K. Slocum, K. Toth, F. A. Durrani, M.-b. Yin, L. Pendyala, W. Zhang, H. L. McLeod, and Y. M. Rustum
Therapeutic Synergy Between Irinotecan and 5-Fluorouracil against Human Tumor Xenografts
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2004; 10(3): 1121 - 1129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
K. Uchida, K. Hayashi, K. Kawakami, S. Schneider, J. M. Yochim, H. Kuramochi, K. Takasaki, K. D. Danenberg, and P. V. Danenberg
Loss of Heterozygosity at the Thymidylate Synthase (TS) Locus on Chromosome 18 Affects Tumor Response and Survival in Individuals Heterozygous for a 28-bp Polymorphism in the TS Gene
Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2004; 10(2): 433 - 439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
O. Belvedere, F. Puglisi, C. Di Loreto, P. Cataldi, A. Guglielmi, C. Aschele, and A. Sobrero
Lack of correlation between immunohistochemical expression of E2F-1, thymidylate synthase expression and clinical response to 5-fluorouracil in advanced colorectal cancer
Ann. Onc., January 1, 2004; 15(1): 55 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. M. Mariadason, D. Arango, Q. Shi, A. J. Wilson, G. A. Corner, C. Nicholas, M. J. Aranes, M. Lesser, E. L. Schwartz, and L. H. Augenlicht
Gene Expression Profiling-Based Prediction of Response of Colon Carcinoma Cells to 5-Fluorouracil and Camptothecin
Cancer Res., December 15, 2003; 63(24): 8791 - 8812.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. P. Sanghani, S. K. Quinney, T. B. Fredenburg, Z. Sun, W. I. Davis, D. J. Murry, O. W. Cummings, D. E. Seitz, and W. F. Bosron
Carboxylesterases Expressed in Human Colon Tumor Tissue and Their Role in CPT-11 Hydrolysis
Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2003; 9(13): 4983 - 4991.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. B. P. van Kuilenburg, R. Meinsma, B. A. Zonnenberg, L. Zoetekouw, F. Baas, K. Matsuda, N. Tamaki, and A. H. van Gennip
Dihydropyrimidinase Deficiency and Severe 5-Fluorouracil Toxicity
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2003; 9(12): 4363 - 4367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. Alimonti, G. Ferretti, S. Di Cosimo, F. Cognetti, and A. Vecchione
Can Colorectal Cancer Patients With Thymidylate Synthase-Overexpressing Liver Metastases Have an Overall Survival Advantage With Hepatic Arterial Infusion Alone?
J. Clin. Oncol., September 15, 2003; 21(18): 3543 - 3544.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. Kornmann, W. Schwabe, S. Sander, M. Kron, J. Strater, S. Polat, E. Kettner, H. F. Weiser, W. Baumann, H. Schramm, et al.
Thymidylate Synthase and Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase mRNA Expression Levels: Predictors for Survival in Colorectal Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant 5-Fluorouracil
Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2003; 9(11): 4116 - 4124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. van Rijnsoever, H. Elsaleh, D. Joseph, K. McCaul, and B. Iacopetta
CpG Island Methylator Phenotype Is an Independent Predictor of Survival Benefit from 5-Fluorouracil in Stage III Colorectal Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2003; 9(8): 2898 - 2903.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
H. Ezzeldin, M. R. Johnson, Y. Okamoto, and R. Diasio
Denaturing High Performance Liquid Chromatography Analysis of the DPYD Gene in Patients with Lethal 5-Fluorouracil Toxicity
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2003; 9(8): 3021 - 3028.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
The Colorectal Cancer Chemotherapy Study Group of
Results of a Randomized Trial with or without 5-FU-based Preoperative Chemotherapy followed by Postoperative Chemotherapy in Resected Colon and Rectal Carcinoma
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2003; 33(6): 288 - 296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
V. Cohen, V. Panet-Raymond, N. Sabbaghian, I. Morin, G. Batist, and R. Rozen
Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase Polymorphism in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: A Novel Genomic Predictor of Clinical Response to Fluoropyrimidine-based Chemotherapy
Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2003; 9(5): 1611 - 1615.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. R. Bertino and D. Banerjee
Is the Measurement of Thymidylate Synthase to Determine Suitability for Treatment with 5-Fluoropyrimidines Ready for Prime Time?
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2003; 9(4): 1235 - 1239.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. Salesiotis, R. Soong, R. B. Diasio, A. Frost, and K. J. Cullen
Capecitabine Induces Rapid, Sustained Response in Two Patients with Extensive Oral Verrucous Carcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2003; 9(2): 580 - 585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
W. Ichikawa, H. Uetake, Y. Shirota, H. Yamada, N. Nishi, Z. Nihei, K. Sugihara, and R. Hirayama
Combination of Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase and Thymidylate Synthase Gene Expressions in Primary Tumors as Predictive Parameters for the Efficacy of Fluoropyrimidine-based Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2003; 9(2): 786 - 791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
D. C. Farrugia, H. E. R. Ford, D. Cunningham, K. D. Danenberg, P. V. Danenberg, J. Brabender, A. D. McVicar, G. W. Aherne, A. Hardcastle, K. McCarthy, et al.
Thymidylate Synthase Expression in Advanced Colorectal Cancer Predicts for Response to Raltitrexed
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2003; 9(2): 792 - 801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
N J Maughan and P Quirke
Pathology - a molecular prognostic approach: Advances in colorectal cancer
Br. Med. Bull., December 1, 2002; 64(1): 59 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
C. Aschele, D. Debernardis, R. Bandelloni, S. Cascinu, V. Catalano, P. Giordani, S. Barni, D. Turci, G. Drudi, S. Lonardi, et al.
Thymidylate synthase protein expression in colorectal cancer metastases predicts for clinical outcome to leucovorin-modulated bolus or infusional 5-fluorouracil but not methotrexate-modulated bolus 5-fluorouracil
Ann. Onc., December 1, 2002; 13(12): 1882 - 1892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
A. J. Bilchik, D. T. Nora, S. Saha, R. Turner, D. Wiese, C. Kuo, X. Ye, D. L. Morton, and D. S. B. Hoon
The Use of Molecular Profiling of Early Colorectal Cancer to Predict Micrometastases
Arch Surg, December 1, 2002; 137(12): 1377 - 1383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
C. Blanquicett, G. Y. Gillespie, L. B. Nabors, C. R. Miller, S. Bharara, D. J. Buchsbaum, Robert. B. Diasio, and M. R. Johnson
Induction of Thymidine Phosphorylase in Both Irradiated and Shielded, Contralateral Human U87MG Glioma Xenografts: Implications for a Dual Modality Treatment Using Capecitabine and Irradiation
Mol. Cancer Ther., October 1, 2002; 1(12): 1139 - 1145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Castro
Eniluracil's Need for a Targeted Approach: A Lesson in Drug Development
J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2002; 20(17): 3750 - 3750.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
B. A. Chabner
Cytotoxic Agents in the Era of Molecular Targets and Genomics
Oncologist, August 1, 2002; 7(90003): 34 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
Y. Shirota, W. Ichikawa, H. Uetake, H. Yamada, Z. Nihei, and K. Sugihara
Intratumoral Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Messenger RNA Level Reflects Tumor Progression in Human Colorectal Cancer
Ann. Surg. Oncol., July 1, 2002; 9(6): 599 - 603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M.-C. Etienne, M. Chazal, P. Laurent-Puig, N. Magne, C. Rosty, J.-L. Formento, M. Francoual, P. Formento, N. Renee, E. Chamorey, et al.
Prognostic Value of Tumoral Thymidylate Synthase and p53 in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Receiving Fluorouracil-Based Chemotherapy: Phenotypic and Genotypic Analyses
J. Clin. Oncol., June 15, 2002; 20(12): 2832 - 2843.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. M. Borner, D. Dietrich, R. Stupp, R. Morant, H. Honegger, M. Wernli, R. Herrmann, B. C. Pestalozzi, P. Saletti, S. Hanselmann, et al.
Phase II Study of Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin in First- and Second-Line Treatment of Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2002; 20(7): 1759 - 1766.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
C.-H. Kohne, D. Cunningham, F. Di Costanzo, B. Glimelius, G. Blijham, E. Aranda, W. Scheithauer, P. Rougier, M. Palmer, J. Wils, et al.
Clinical determinants of survival in patients with 5-fluorouracil- based treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a multivariate analysis of 3825 patients
Ann. Onc., February 20, 2002; 13(2): 308 - 317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. L. Schilsky, D. Bertucci, N. J. Vogelzang, H. L. Kindler, and M. J. Ratain
Dose-Escalating Study of Capecitabine Plus Gemcitabine Combination Therapy in Patients With Advanced Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., January 15, 2002; 20(2): 582 - 587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
H. Zembutsu, Y. Ohnishi, T. Tsunoda, Y. Furukawa, T. Katagiri, Y. Ueyama, N. Tamaoki, T. Nomura, O. Kitahara, R. Yanagawa, et al.
Genome-wide cDNA Microarray Screening to Correlate Gene Expression Profiles with Sensitivity of 85 Human Cancer Xenografts to Anticancer Drugs
Cancer Res., January 1, 2002; 62(2): 518 - 527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
Y. Shirota, J. Stoehlmacher, J. Brabender, Y.-P. Xiong, H. Uetake, K. D. Danenberg, S. Groshen, D. D. Tsao-Wei, P. V. Danenberg, and H.-J. Lenz
ERCC1 and Thymidylate Synthase mRNA Levels Predict Survival for Colorectal Cancer Patients Receiving Combination Oxaliplatin and Fluorouracil Chemotherapy
J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2001; 19(23): 4298 - 4304.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
J. Ciccolini, P. Cuq, A. Evrard, S. Giacometti, A. Pelegrin, C. Aubert, J.-P. Cano, and A. Iliadis
Combination of Thymidine Phosphorylase Gene Transfer and Deoxyinosine Treatment Greatly Enhances 5-Fluorouracil Antitumor Activity in Vitro and in Vivo
Mol. Cancer Ther., December 1, 2001; 1(2): 133 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
K. Kawakami, D. Salonga, J. M. Park, K. D. Danenberg, H. Uetake, J. Brabender, K. Omura, G. Watanabe, and P. V. Danenberg
Different Lengths of a Polymorphic Repeat Sequence in the Thymidylate Synthase Gene Affect Translational Efficiency but Not Its Gene Expression
Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2001; 7(12): 4096 - 4101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. B. P. van Kuilenburg, E. W. Muller, J. Haasjes, R. Meinsma, L. Zoetekouw, H. R. Waterham, F. Baas, D. J. Richel, and A. H. van Gennip
Lethal Outcome of a Patient with a Complete Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase (DPD) Deficiency after Administration of 5-Fluorouracil: Frequency of the Common IVS14+1G>A Mutation Causing DPD Deficiency
Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2001; 7(5): 1149 - 1153.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
T. Watanabe, T.-T. Wu, P. J. Catalano, T. Ueki, R. Satriano, D. G. Haller, A. B. Benson, and S. R. Hamilton
Molecular Predictors of Survival after Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Colon Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., April 19, 2001; 344(16): 1196 - 1206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. L. Grem, K. D. Danenberg, K. Behan, A. Parr, L. Young, P. V. Danenberg, D. Nguyen, J. Drake, A. Monks, and C. J. Allegra
Thymidine Kinase, Thymidylate Synthase, and Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Profiles of Cell Lines of the National Cancer Institute's Anticancer Drug Screen
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2001; 7(4): 999 - 1009.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. B. P. van Kuilenburg, J. Haasjes, D. J. Richel, L. Zoetekouw, H. Van Lenthe, R. A. De Abreu, J. G. Maring, P. Vreken, and A. H. van Gennip
Clinical Implications of Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase (DPD) Deficiency in Patients with Severe 5-Fluorouracil-associated Toxicity: Identification of New Mutations in the DPD Gene
Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2000; 6(12): 4705 - 4712.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salonga, D.
Right arrow Articles by Danenberg, P. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Salonga, D.
Right arrow Articles by Danenberg, P. V.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online