Clinical Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Visonneau, S.
Right arrow Articles by Santoli, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Visonneau, S.
Right arrow Articles by Santoli, D.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 6, 1744-1754, May 2000
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research


Clinical Trials

Phase I Trial of TALL-104 Cells in Patients with Refractory Metastatic Breast Cancer1

Sophie Visonneau, Alessandra Cesano, David L. Porter, Selina L. Luger, Lynn Schuchter, Malek Kamoun, Michael H. Torosian, Kathy Duffy, Cheryl Sickles, Edward A. Stadtmauer and Daniela Santoli2

The Wistar Institute [S. V., A. C., D. S.], The University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center [D. L. P., S. L. L., L. S., M. K., K. D., E. A. S.], and The Fox Chase Cancer Center [M. H. T.], Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The human cytotoxic T-cell line TALL-104 displays antitumor effects in animals with implanted and spontaneous malignancies. A Phase I trial was conducted to determine toxicity of TALL-104 cell therapy in women with metastatic refractory breast cancer. Fifteen patients with metastatic infiltrating ductal (n = 12), lobular (n = 2), or medullary (n = 1) carcinoma received escalating doses of lethally irradiated TALL-104 cells (three patients/group received 106, 3 x 106, 107, 3 x 107, and 108 cells/kg) for 5 consecutive days (induction course). Patients without progressive disease received monthly maintenance 2-day infusions at the same dose level. Mild grade I/II toxicity developed in 11 patients regardless of cell dose. One grade IV toxicity consequent to hepatic tumor necrosis occurred in a patient given 108 cells/kg, 3 weeks after the induction course. Nine patients progressed within 1 month from induction, and five patients had stable disease for 2–6 months. One patient (at 3 x 107/kg) had improvement of liver metastases and ascites, and a second patient (at 106/kg) experienced a dramatic relief in bone pain. Increases in blood natural killer cell activity and levels of IFN-{gamma}, interleukin-10, and activation markers (soluble interleukin-2 receptor and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1) were often seen. Only one patient developed anti-HLA class I antibody responses against TALL-104 cells; specific CTL activity developed in three patients during induction and in four patients during the maintenance boosts. In conclusion, TALL-104 cells were well tolerated by patients with metastatic breast cancer at the doses and regimen tested. The clinical responses observed in this preliminary trial demonstrate that further investigation of TALL-104 cell therapy is warranted.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Despite great improvements in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer, metastatic disease is still incurable. A variety of therapeutic approaches are ongoing, such as a more rational use of existing drugs (i.e., via dose intensification and drug combinations), testing of new drugs and antiangiogenic agents, and gene therapy or immunotherapy (reviewed in Ref. 1 ). Although each of the above strategies has merits, immunological approaches are particularly appealing because their mechanisms of action and toxicity are usually non-cross-reactive with the ones of chemotherapy, and more importantly, they might induce a tumor-specific and long-lasting resistance, thus protecting from recurrence.

The human major histocompatibility complex nonrestricted killer cell line TALL-104 (CD3+, CD8+, CD56+, CD16-) developed in this laboratory (2 , 3) might represent a new immunotherapeutic approach to cancer, as suggested by evidence in animal models. Specifically, adoptive transfer of lethally irradiated (40 Gy) TALL-104 cells into SCID3 mice has induced regression of transplantable human hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic malignancies (4, 5, 6, 7, 8) . In addition, remarkable antitumor effects were seen in immunocompetent mice bearing syngeneic leukemia (9) and in pet dogs with spontaneous tumors (10, 11, 12) . Although TALL-104 cell killing in vitro is mostly mediated by necrotic mechanisms involving the release of cytotoxic factors (granzymes, perforin, and TIA-1; Ref. 3 ), several tumor targets die by apoptosis (7 , 9) ; in addition, cytostatic mediators and cytokines (e.g., TNF), released by TALL-104 cells upon interaction with the tumors (5 , 10, 11, 12) , play a role in the induction of tumor death. In vivo, TALL-104 cells have been shown to induce tumor necrosis (5 , 10) ; moreover, multiple systemic delivery of TALL-104 cells into immunocompetent animals was followed by the development of antitumor immunity (immunological memory) that protected the animals from tumor rechallenge (in mice) or progression (in dogs; Refs. 9, 10, 11 ). Biodistribution studies in healthy animals showed that 111In-labeled TALL-104 cells, injected i.v, rapidly localized in the lungs, liver, and kidneys; 2 h after injection, the lungs were cleared, whereas liver, kidney, spleen, and bone marrow were the organs with major TALL-104 cell accumulation in the following 24 h (13 , 14) . Importantly, in tumor-bearing animals, 111In-labeled TALL-104 cells were present both within the primary tumor mass and at the site of distant metastases (6 , 14) .

Our previous preclinical studies in SCID mice engrafted with human breast carcinomas (6 , 14) and in pet dogs and cats with spontaneous metastatic mammary tumors (15) 4 have shown that breast cancer is highly sensitive to the antitumor effects of TALL-104 cells. These encouraging results prompted us to initiate this Phase I clinical trial to explore the safety and potential efficacy of escalating doses of lethally irradiated TALL-104 cells administered systemically to women with refractory metastatic breast cancer. The maximal dose tested (108/kg/day) was the one proven effective in preclinical veterinary studies (10, 11, 12 , 15) .


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Patient Eligibility.
The patients enrolled in this study were required to have histologically proven metastatic breast cancer, relapsed after at least two lines of chemotherapy and other therapies that could include SCT (Table 1)Citation . Other eligibility criteria included age >18 years, performance status 0–1 (by the criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group), life expectancy >8 weeks, and adequate hematopoietic (absolute neutrophil count >1,500/ml3 and platelets >100,000/ml3), hepatic (total bilirubin level <1.5 mg/dl), and renal (creatinine concentration <1.5 mg/dl) functions.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1

Patient characteristics

 
Patients with medical conditions requiring steroid administration were excluded, based on in vitro observations that steroids interfere with the antitumor activity (cytotoxicity and cytokine production) of TALL-104 cells (not shown). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients, and the protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Boards at both the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania and The Wistar Institute.

Trial Design.
The trial was designed as a single-center, open-label, dose-escalation study. The schedule of administration included a first 5-day cycle (induction course) of lethally irradiated (40 Gy) TALL-104 cells administered by i.v. infusion (100 ml) over 60 min, followed by 2-day monthly boosts until disease progression or limiting toxicity (Fig. 1)Citation . Five dose levels of TALL-104 cells (106/kg, 3 x 106/kg, 107/kg, 3 x 107/kg, and 108/kg) were tested (three patients/dose level; Table 2Citation ). No intrapatient dose escalation was allowed. Twenty-eight treatment courses were administered in this trial, for a total of 101 cell injections (Table 2)Citation . All patients received premedication with diphenylhydramine and acetaminophen within 1 h before the start of each cell infusion.



View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Treatment schema.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2

TALL-104 cell dose/courses administered to the patients

 
Pretreatment and Follow-Up Studies.
Histories, physical examinations (including pain assessment), routine laboratory studies, and complete tumor staging (using appropriate radiological techniques) were performed prior to TALL-104 treatment. When available, excess tumor tissue was cryopreserved and used later for: (a) engraftment studies in SCID mice, and (b) in vitro studies measuring sensitivity to killing by TALL-104 cells and/or patient’s CTLs. Irradiated TALL-104 cells were infused at a slow rate over 60 min; all patients were hospitalized during the 5-day treatment in the Clinical Research Center Unit at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania. During cell infusion, patients were closely monitored, and their vital signs were recorded at times 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, 75, 90, 120, and 240 min and every 24 h thereafter. Together with the clinical evaluation for toxicity, a complete blood count, including differential, and serum biochemistry tests (electrolytes, alkaline phosphatases, urea and creatinine, and liver function tests) were performed daily during each cell course. The tumor marker CEA was checked before treatment and weekly thereafter. Patients were examined weekly for symptoms and signs of toxicity for at least 4 weeks after the last cell injection. Tumor assessment was repeated before each cell cycle. Treatment was discontinued when progressive disease or limiting toxicity was documented.

Manufacturing of the TALL-104 Clinical Product.
Manufacturing of clinical grade TALL-104 cells was performed under Good Laboratory Practice conditions in a specially designated facility at The Wistar Institute. TALL-104 cells were grown in endotoxin-free Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium (Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Atlanta Biologicals, Norcross, GA) and 100 units/ml recombinant human IL-2 (Chiron Therapeutics, Emeryville, CA) in humidified incubators at 37°C with 10% CO2 in T-175 vented-cap flasks (Falcon, Franklin Lakes, NJ). Mycoplasma contamination was monitored weekly on cell samples taken from at least two flasks from each incubator using a commercial PCR kit (American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD). Three times a week, cells were harvested by centrifugation in 250-ml conical tubes (Corning, New York, NY), washed twice in saline (Abbott Laboratories, King of Prussia, PA), {gamma}-irradiated (40 Gy) using a 137Cs source, resuspended in freezing medium consisting of human plasma protein fraction 5% (American Red Cross Blood Services, Philadelphia, PA) and 10% DMSO (Rimso; Tera Pharmaceuticals, Buena Park, CA), and then transferred into Fenwal transfer pack containers (Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Deerfield, IL). The TALL-104 cell packs were stored at -70°C. Each lot of frozen TALL-104 cell packs was tested for sterility, Mycoplasma contamination, endotoxin, purity, identity, phenotype, proliferation, and cytotoxic function (quality control assays; Table 3Citation ). Only lots that met the standard criteria summarized in Table 3Citation were used for patient administration. When needed for infusion, frozen TALL-104 cell packs were rapidly thawed in a 37°C water bath, and saline was added to reach a final volume of 100 ml. Cell aliquots were removed from each pack for determination of cytotoxic and proliferative activities and sterility (quality control assays). The TALL-104 cell packs were then handed to the clinical personnel for patient injection, as described above. A Gram’s stain (statim) was performed at Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania just before infusion.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3

Quality controls and criteria for acceptance of TALL-104 cells for clinical use

 
Immunological Monitoring.
Immunological studies were performed on serum and PBMC samples (pretreatment, before each TALL-104 cell injection, and during the follow-up period) to monitor the development of TALL-104-specific humoral and cellular immune responses, respectively. PBMCs were isolated from heparinized blood samples by Accu-Prep (specific gravity, 1077 g/ml; Accurate Chemical, Westbury, NY) and lymphocyte gradient centrifugation and tested as effectors in an 18-h 51Cr release assay against TALL-104 cells and the NK-sensitive human leukemic cell line K562, as described previously (3 , 16) .

When available, tumor cells harvested from patients’ tumor biopsies by mechanical dissociation (6 , 17) were cultured briefly and tested in 18-h 51Cr release assays for susceptibility to the lytic activity of TALL-104 cells and autologous PBMCs.

Monitoring of anti-TALL-104 cell antibodies in the patients’ sera was performed by immunofluorescence. Briefly, the sera were diluted 1:100 and 1:1000 in FACS buffer (9, 10, 11, 12 , 15) and incubated for 1 h with the TALL-104 cells. After three washes in FACS buffer, FITC-conjugated goat antihuman IgG (whole molecule) and antihuman IgM (µ-chain specific; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) were added at a 1:100 dilution in FACS buffer for another hour. After final washes in FACS buffer, the percentage of reactivity of the sera with TALL-104 cells was calculated as described previously (9, 10, 11, 12 , 15) . HLA class I antibody screening in the patients’ sera was performed using a cell panel from 35 volunteers and the AHG-CDC assay. Furthermore, indirect immunofluorescence flow cytometry technique using HLA class I microbeads (One Lamba, Inc., Canoga Park, CA) was performed to specifically detect anti-HLA class I antibodies, as described (18 , 19) .

Variations in serum levels of two markers for nonspecific immune activation, i.e., sIL2-R and sICAM-1, were also investigated, using commercially available ELISA kits (Endogen, Woburn, MA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The sensitivity of the assays was 24 units/ml for sIL2-R and 0.3 ng/ml for sICAM-1.

Cytokine Assays.
Patients’ sera were collected pre-TALL-104 cell infusion (time 0) and at 2, 4, and 6 h after TALL-104 cell infusion; on day 1, before each TALL-104 infusion on days 2, 3, and 5; and weekly thereafter until disease progression. The presence of IFN-{gamma}, TNF-{alpha}, TNF-ß, GM-CSF, and IL-10 in the sera was tested using human cytokine-specific ELISA kits, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The sensitivity of the assays was 2 pg/ml for IFN-{gamma} and GM-CSF, 5 pg/ml for TNF-{alpha}, 3 pg/ml for IL-10 (Endogen), and 7 pg/ml for TNF-ß (R&D, Minneapolis, MN).

PCR Analysis.
Patient PBMC samples, obtained immediately before each TALL-104 cell infusion, daily during infusions, and at subsequent visits after cell infusions, were subjected to DNA extraction using standard techniques (6 , 10, 11, 12 , 15) . The presence of circulating TALL-104 cells in each cell extract was evaluated by PCR analysis using two primers specific for the human minisatellite region YNZ.22. An oligonucleotide probe recognizing 24 nucleotides in the middle of the amplified sequence was used to demonstrate the specificity of the PCR products by Southern blot hybridization, as described previously (6 , 10, 11, 12 , 15) .

Statistical Analysis.
The significance of hematological and immunological changes within each patient during and after TALL-104 cell infusions was tested by paired Student’s t test.


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Patient Population.
The characteristics of the 15 patients enrolled in this study are summarized in Table 1Citation . Median age was 49 years (range, 33–63 years); the primary diagnosis was infiltrating ductal carcinoma (12 patients), infiltrating lobular carcinoma (2 patients), and medullary carcinoma (1 patient). All but one patient had failed a combination of at least two different treatments including chemotherapy, radiation therapy, hormonal therapy, immunotherapy with HER2/neu antibodies, or high-dose chemotherapy with SCT. One patient (008) had progressed after only one chemotherapy regimen but was ineligible for further chemotherapy because of a severe cardiopulmonary syndrome. Two patients (001 and 003) had platelets <100,000/ml (3) attributable to a history of autologous SCT, two patients (010 and 011) had increased alkaline phosphatase levels attributable to metastatic disease, and one patient (015) had a history of brain metastases.

Clinical Responses.
Nine patients had progressive disease by 1 month after the induction course and received no further therapy with TALL-104 cells. Five patients receiving 106 (n = 2), 3 x 106 (n = 2), and 108 (n = 1) cells/kg had SD for 2–6 months after the induction course, thus qualifying for monthly maintenance boosts; among them, patient 001 had a significant reduction in narcotic requirements for bone pain. One patient (011) had a decrease in size of liver metastases (many of the lesions having become necrotic) and in the amount of perihepatic and pelvic fluid 3 weeks after receiving the TALL-104 induction course at 3 x 107/kg. Unfortunately, this patient withdrew from the study for personal reasons before receiving the first monthly boost, precluding further evaluation. As of February 2000 (16 months after the end of the study), three patients (013, 014, and 015) are still alive with active disease. Elevated levels of the CEA tumor marker (492, 68.6, 254, and 175.5 units/l) were present pretreatment in four patients (001, 009, 011, and 014, respectively). Only 1 of these patients (001) had SD after the induction course, although the CEA rose to 2.6 times the pretreatment level, 2 months after the first TALL-104 infusion. No patient had a decrease in CEA levels during this trial.

Toxicity.
No significant toxicity was associated with TALL-104 cell infusions, although the DMSO present in the cell product was responsible for taste change and alithosis in almost all patients. One patient (014) experienced grade IV nausea, vomiting, and fevers related to necrosis of hepatic metastases, 3 weeks after TALL-104 induction, but no other grade III and IV toxicities were seen (Table 4)Citation . Several patients experienced grade I-II toxicities as outlined in Table 4Citation , which were transient and of uncertain relationship to TALL-104 cell infusions. No toxic effects were observed in any of the patients who underwent maintenance therapy (not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4

TALL-104-related toxicities during or after the induction course

 
Laboratory Findings.
A trend toward a decrease in the total WBCs over the first 5 days after the TALL-104 induction course was noted, although the limited number of patients treated at each dose level precludes a more detailed analysis (not shown). The mean monocyte count at the same time points showed a trend toward an increase (not shown); values 3.2 times higher than the basal value were seen in patient 002 (at 106 cells/kg). A similar trend toward an increase was observed for the mean eosinophil count at any dose level (not shown). None of these changes were statistically significant, and they all consistently normalized within a week from the last cell injection. No significant changes were noted for the absolute number of granulocytes, lymphocytes, or platelets.

Detection of Circulating TALL-104 Cells.
Short-term (1 week) and long-term (up to 2 months) monitoring of circulating TALL-104 cells was performed in 5 patients by PCR analysis. TALL-104 cells were detectable in the peripheral blood of all five patients during the 5-day induction treatment but could no longer be detected by day 7 from the last cell injection in each cycle (not shown).

Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses against TALL-104 Cells.
Only one patient (012) developed antibodies against TALL-104 cells; serum from this patient became 89.1% reactive with TALL-104 cells as early as day 7 from the start of therapy and remained positive until the date off study (2 weeks later). By the AHG-CDC bioassay and indirect immunofluorescence flow cytometry analyses with HLA class I microbeads, it could be determined that the postimmune serum from patient 012 reacted with HLA class I antigens, whereas the preimmune serum was not reactive (Fig. 2)Citation . Furthermore, the postimmune serum was reactive by AHG-CDC with the cell panel. The HLA specificity of this serum was broad and included the TALL-104 HLA class I antigens (not shown). Importantly, the postimmune serum did not inhibit TALL-104 killer activity against the patient’s own tumor biopsy in in vitro cytotoxicity assays (not shown). No other patient developed detectable antibodies against TALL-104 cells, including the five patients who received monthly boosts for 2–6 months (not shown).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Serum reactivity of patient 012 to TALL-104 cells and HLA class I antigen panel; ----, serum collected before TALL-104 therapy (day 0), , serum collected 3 weeks from the start of TALL-104 therapy. Results are shown as the percentage of serum reactivity (mean fluorescence intensity).

 
Five patients had baseline killer activity against TALL-104 cells (>15% specific 51Cr release). In most patients, no increase in this activity was observed up to 5 days after the initial TALL-104 infusions (Fig. 3A)Citation , although in three patients (002, 007, and 012) specific killing of TALL-104 cells either developed or increased (Fig. 3B)Citation , regardless of cell dose.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. A, TALL-104 cell lysis by patients’ PBMCs during the induction course. B, development or increase of TALL-104 cell lysis in three patients. E:T ratio, 100:1.

 
Immunological Monitoring of NK and Tumor-specific CTL Activities.
Basal (pretreatment) levels of peripheral blood NK activity (K562 cell lysis) was present in most patients and did not change significantly up to 5 days after TALL-104 infusions (Fig. 4)Citation . The limited number of patients in the study and the large variability of NK activity among the patient population precluded an analysis of the statistical significance of this observation.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Peripheral blood NK activity against K562 cells during the TALL-104 induction course. E:T ratio, 100:1.

 
PBMCs from patients 003, 008, 009, 012, and 015 were tested for the ability to kill autologous tumor cells before and after TALL-104 therapy. Tumor biopsies consisted of surgical lymph nodes and a chest wall mass. None of these patients displayed baseline killer activity against the freshly explanted tumors (<1% 51Cr release at E:T ratio of 100:1); interestingly, patient 008 developed tumor-specific CTLs (28% 51Cr release) 1 month after TALL-104 cell infusions.

Four of the tumor specimens were sensitive to in vitro lysis by TALL-104 cells (Table 5)Citation . Cytokine production was detected in the supernatants of all five tumor/TALL-104 cocultures (Table 5Citation and Fig. 5Citation ). The levels of cytokines in the cocultures with tumor cells isolated from lymph node biopsies were low (003, 012, and 015; Fig. 5A)Citation or intermediate (009; Fig. 5B)Citation , whereas those with tumor cells from the chest wall of one patient (008) were remarkably high (Fig. 5C)Citation .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5

In vitro and in vivo assays with patients’ tumor biopsies

 


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. In vitro cytokine production upon incubation of TALL-104 cells with cells from patients’ tumor biopsies. TNF-{alpha}, TNF-ß, IFN-{gamma}, GM-CSF, and IL-10 were measured in the supernatants of 18-h cocultures of TALL-104 cells with tumor cell suspensions from 5 patients. A and B, tumor biopsies originated from lymph nodes. C, tumor biopsy originated from chest walls.

 
Growth of Tumor Biopsies in SCID Mice.
Tumor biopsies (5 x 5-mm fragments) were implanted s.c. in SCID mice, as described previously (6 , 17) . Six months later, a palpable tumor mass developed locally in only two of the four female mice engrafted with the lymph node specimen from patient 009. At necropsy, 15 months after engraftment, macroscopic examination of these two mice revealed the presence of a small, soft, well-vascularized primary tumor mass (570 mg), small metastatic axillary lymph nodes, and slight splenomegaly. Tumor biopsies from other patients failed to engraft during the 6–18-month follow-up (Table 5)Citation .

Serum Cytokines and Immune Activation Markers.
The presence of cytokines (IL-10, IFN-{gamma}, TNF-{alpha}, TNF-ß, and GM-CSF) known to be released by TALL-104 cells in vitro (20) and in animal studies (10, 11, 12) upon interaction with tumor cells was measured in patients’ sera before and at different time points during the TALL-104 induction course. None of the patients had detectable serum levels of TNF-{alpha}, TNF-ß (<5 pg/ml), or GM-CSF (<2 pg/ml) before and during cell treatment, except for patient 001, who had increased TNF-{alpha} levels (7.6 pg/ml) starting on day 4 of the induction course.

IFN-{gamma} was present in the sera of 13 patients pretreatment and increased by >20% in three cases, at 2 h (n = 1), 4 h (n = 1), or 5 days (n = 1) after the first TALL-104 infusion. Two additional patients who had no detectable levels of IFN-{gamma} before treatment had significant levels of this cytokine during the induction course, starting at 4 h on day 1 (patient 008) or on day 3 (patient 005). Nine patients had baseline elevated levels of IL-10, which increased by >20% in three patients during treatment, starting at 2 h (014) or 4 h (012) of day 1 or on day 4 (007) of the induction course, independent of TALL-104 cell dose. Four patients with undetectable levels of IL-10 before treatment had significant levels of this cytokine starting at 2 h (n = 1) and 4 h (n = 3) on day 1 of the induction course.

Serum levels of the sIL-2R and sICAM-1 markers, associated with nonspecific immune activation, were measured at the same time points. As shown in Fig. 6Citation , there was a trend toward an increase in both markers during TALL-104 cell infusions, which was evident as soon as day 1 after treatment and returned to baseline by day 5. No statistically significant difference was observed when high (Fig. 6, A and C)Citation versus low (Fig. 6, B and D)Citation pretreatment levels were compared.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Serum levels of sIL2-R (A and B) and sICAM-1 (C and D) during the TALL-104 induction course.

 
Immunological Monitoring during Maintenance Therapy.
The five patients who had SD (see Table 2Citation ) were immunologically monitored during the 2-day monthly maintenance infusions (see treatment schema, Fig. 1Citation ). None of these patients had detectable serum levels of TNF-{alpha}, TNF-ß, or GM-CSF before or during the boosts. The IFN-{gamma} and IL-10 levels observed on day 5 of the induction course consistently returned to baseline levels before each subsequent monthly boost and always increased on day 2 of each boost (not shown). In the case of patient 001, the increased levels of IL-10 (61.8 pg/ml) that developed 4 h after the first TALL-104 infusion were still present in the patient’s serum up to 3 months after the start of therapy (not shown). sIL2-R and sICAM-1 serum activation markers followed the same pattern described for the cytokines, with return to baseline levels before each TALL-104 cell infusion, followed consistently by an increase on day 2 of each monthly boost (not shown).

Peripheral blood NK activity against K562 cells was highly variable among patients and also varied within each individual patient when tested at different times. An example is shown in Fig. 7Citation for patient 005, whose NK activity, seen at day 5 of the induction course, remained stable until after the second boost; her NK activity increased at this time, stabilized until administration of the third boost, decreased until administration of boost 4, and rose again after boost 4 and during boost 5 (6 months after initiation of cell therapy), reaching the maximum value (Fig. 7)Citation .



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Peripheral blood cytotoxic activity of patient 005 against K562 cells and TALL-104 cells during the five TALL-104 monthly maintenance infusions. E:T ratio, 100:1; i.c., induction course.

 
TALL-104-specific cellular immune responses (CTL activity) developed in all patients receiving boosts, with the exception of patient 013, who did not have CTL activity up to 3 months from initiation of therapy (not shown). In patient 005, baseline cytotoxicity against K562 and TALL-104 cells consistently increased on day 2 of each boost up to 6 months from initiation of cell therapy (Fig. 7)Citation .


    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Autologous effector cell-based approaches are being evaluated in the clinic that have either a direct tumoricidal function or act by stimulating the immune system against the patient’s own tumor cells (21, 22, 23) . Two Phase II trials of high-dose IL-2/LAK therapy were performed in patients with either advanced breast carcinoma or advanced cancers arising in other sites; of all patients, one with adenocarcinoma of the breast had a partial response of 17 weeks’ duration (23) . Very few breast cancer patients have been treated with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and in those treated, there have been no responses (24) . Although the use of autologous adoptive immunotherapy has been disappointing, recent data suggest that allogeneic cell therapy may be effective as primary therapy for patients with various malignancies (25) ; in particular, allogeneic donor T cells can mediate a potent graft-versus-tumor reaction in patients who have relapsed after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (26 , 27) ; a clinically significant graft-versus-tumor effect also was suggested after HLA-matched sibling SCT or bone marrow transplantation in patients with metastatic breast cancer (28 , 29) or after adoptive transfer of recombinant human IL-2-activated, HLA-matched donor PBMCs given after autologous SCT (30) .

Unlike HLA-matched, sibling/donor-derived effector cells, TALL-104 cells represent a universal donor system and provide an unlimited and reliable source of tumoricidal cells with stable cytotoxic activity, which is ideal for adoptive immunotherapy approaches. Although dependent on IL-2 for expression of cytotoxicity and long-term survival in vitro, TALL-104 cells display antitumor effects in animal models when used as a single agent (4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 , 15) , thus offering a potentially nontoxic cell therapy approach as compared with LAK or tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapies in association with IL-2 (21 , 22) . The major objective of the present study was to evaluate the potential toxicities associated with multiple systemic administrations of lethally irradiated, nondividing, TALL-104 cells in women with metastatic refractory breast cancer. In addition, immunological studies were performed in an attempt to identify surrogate markers for toxicity and/or clinical responses.

Adverse effects from TALL-104 cell therapy were generally minimal, limited to grade I-II toxicity, and were often of uncertain relationship to cell infusions. Mild gastrointestinal toxicity (nausea and vomiting) was observed during TALL-104 treatment in 40% of the treated patients. This has also been reported to occur in 80% of cancer patients during LAK/IL-2 therapy (31) and was reported in 5% of TALL-104-treated dogs with spontaneous tumors in our previous study (10) . Taste change and alithosis was associated with the presence of DMSO used as cryostabilizer in the TALL-104 cell packs. The range of DMSO given with each TALL-104 cell infusion varied from 0.06 to 0.2 g/kg; this dose is much lower than that (0.2–1.3 g/kg) administered during autologous SCT using cryopreserved grafts, perhaps explaining, at least in part, the lack of toxic signs (flushing and pulmonary and abdominal toxicity) attributed to DMSO in those trials (32 , 33) . Another explanation for the low incidence of side effects in our study may be the low level of cell-lysed products infused (TALL-104 cell viability after thawing was 85–90%). Comparatively, in thawed marrow grafts, the final amount of cell lysis products injected may be very high, depending on the quantity of contaminant mature cells present, which are usually poorly preserved (32 , 33) .

No severe toxicities, such as hypotension, secondary to increased capillary permeability, were observed in our study. These effects have been reported to be induced by autologous LAK/IL-2 therapy (34) . Although the mechanism by which IL-2 and LAK cells induce a vascular leak syndrome is unknown, LAK cells have been shown to bind and lyse normal human vascular endothelial cells in vitro (35 , 36) . Whether this applies also to TALL-104 cells is now under investigation in this laboratory. However, the absence of vascular leak syndrome in mice, dogs, cats, and monkeys treated with up to 5 x 108/kg TALL-104 cells in the absence of exogenous sIL-2 (4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 , 37) suggests that this effect does not reach biological significance with TALL-104 cells.

None of the common hematological abnormalities induced by LAK/IL-2 therapy (anemia, lymphopenia followed by rebound lymphocytosis, and thrombocytopenia with coagulation disorders; Ref. 38 ) were detected in the present study. Grade I-II leukopenia with neutropenia was seen in two patients and rapidly reversed once therapy was halted. Most patients developed a mild degree of monocytosis and eosinophilia; this abnormality has also been reported in patients treated with IL-2 and LAK cells (38) .

Previous studies in pet dogs with spontaneous cancers (10, 11, 12 , 15) indicated that the presence of human (TALL-104 released) TNF-{alpha}, TNF-ß, and IFN-{gamma} in the sera of the treated dogs correlated with clinical efficacy. In the present studies, no changes were observed in serum levels of TNF and GM-CSF, but an increase in the levels of IFN-{gamma} and IL-10 was observed in the sera of 69 and 27% of the patients treated, respectively. Although the cytokine profile observed in the small patient population in this study is difficult to interpret, such cytokine responses may represent a secondary reaction against the introduction of the allogeneic TALL-104 cells rather than being directly involved in an antitumor effect by the cell line. The cellular source (whether TALL-104 or the host’s immune cells) of IFN-{gamma} and IL-10 remains unclear; however, IL-10 has been detected in primary breast cancers and is associated with the induction of T-cell anergy (39) , as a result of T-cell proliferation and function, reduced IL-2 production, and antigen presentation (40) . In a previous study in SCID mice engrafted with a variety of human solid tumors (8) , the serum levels of sICAM-1 in the TALL-104-treated animals correlated with tumor burden and were indicative of treatment efficacy. In the present study, we evaluated the changes in serum levels of sICAM-1 and sIL-2R because these markers are known to be associated with human breast cancer progression (41 , 42) . The changes observed, however, did not reach statistical significance and are difficult to interpret because of the limited number of patients treated at each dose level.

Although it has been suggested that IL-2-activated lymphocytes are hepatotoxic (38 , 43) , we noted mild and transient liver function abnormalities in only two patients. Severe toxicity (grade IV) was observed in only one patient receiving the highest cell dose and was temporarily related to hepatic tumor necrosis developing 3 weeks after the induction course. Although it is difficult to prove that this toxicity was consequent to TALL-104 cell therapy, it is tempting to speculate that this event reflected a marginal response, based on the fact that TALL-104 cells do induce necrotic tumor cell death in vitro (3 , 16) and in animal studies (4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 , 15) . However, no liver tissue was available from this patient to conduct histological and/or in situ hybridization studies to definitively document an antitumor response.

Xenogeneic antibody responses were consistently observed in our preclinical studies involving TALL-104-treated mice, dogs, and monkeys; although such antibodies did not have neutralizing activity in vitro, they were responsible for the progressively faster kinetics of TALL-104 cell clearance with boosts (10, 11, 12, 13 , 15 , 37) . Surprisingly, in the present study, nonneutralizing anti-HLA class I antibodies against TALL-104 cells developed in only 1 of 15 patients. It is possible that the dose, route, and time of TALL-104 cell administration, combined with the host compromised immune status, resulted in a humoral tolerant response versus the allogeneic cells. This explanation would be consistent with previous findings demonstrating that female, first-transplant candidates induced panel-reactive antibodies in only 5–10% of the recipients (44 , 45) . The mechanism of low anti-HLA antibody responses is not known, but it has been suggested that each transfusion induces some degree of clonal expansion that is too low in magnitude to produce a persistent antibody response; with higher numbers of transfusions, an increasing proportion of patients develops a critical mass of memory T and B cells capable of sustaining a persistent antibody response (significant clonal expansion; Refs. 44 and 45 ). In this respect, TALL-104 cells might represent a setting of alloimmunization similar to the one described for allogeneic transfusions and/or transplantations (44 , 45) . A larger number of patients receiving longer periods of treatment needs to be studied to clarify this important issue. Contrary to the antibody responses, specific CTL responses to TALL-104 cells occurred in three patients during the induction course, and in four of five patients over the monthly boosts. Although the cellular responses observed in this immunosuppressed patient population were low, the development of CTL activity to TALL-104 cells might have important therapeutic implications for the design of long-term administration schedules. In fact, our data in healthy dogs (13) clearly indicated a progressively faster clearance of TALL-104 cells from the blood and organs after multiple daily injections as well as at the time of each monthly boost, when host immune responses against the xenogeneic cells had developed. Although the overall lower response to TALL-104 cells observed in cancer patients might not lead to antibody- and cell-mediated rejection of the allogeneic effectors in human trials, studies to analyze the kinetics of distribution and clearance of TALL-104 after multiple injections will be necessary to design effective treatment regimens. One question that needs to be answered is the need for repeated boosts to achieve efficacy; in fact, in preclinical studies (10, 11, 12 , 15) , the number of TALL-104 cell infusions did not seem to correlate with clinical efficacy. Ongoing trials will elucidate whether the administration of higher doses of TALL-104 cells, in a short time period (days) before immune responses develop, would be effective enough to control or eradicate cancer growth through direct tumoricidal effects and/or induction of specific antitumor immunity, thus eliminating the need for long-term boosting.

On the basis of the advanced clinical stage and heavy pretreatment of the 15 patients in this Phase I study, observing even a marginal clinical response in one patient and noting significant pain relief in a second patient is encouraging. These findings, together with the disease stabilization seen in five patients for 2–6 months, suggest biological activity of TALL-104 cells and point to their potential clinical benefit. Clinical trials have been planned to identify patient populations with highly responsive tumor types.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Linda Knox, Laura Manley, and Patricia Mangan for patient care; Thuy Tran and Shelley Sheridan for manufacturing clinical grade TALL-104 cells; Jeffrey Faust for assistance with flow cytometry analysis; Marion Sacks; and the Wistar Editorial Department for preparing the manuscript.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported by United States Army Medical Research and Materiel Command and partially by the Breast Cancer Fund, the Expedition Inspiration Fund, a gift from Felicity and Peter Benoliel, and the NIH Core Grant CA10815-30. Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at The Wistar Institute, 3601 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104. Phone: (215) 898-3978; Fax: (215) 573-7919; E-mail: santoli{at}wistar.upenn.edu Back

3 The abbreviations used are: SCID, severe combined immunodeficiency; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; IL, interleukin; sIL-2R, soluble IL-2 receptor; sICAM, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule; SCT, stem cell transplantation; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cell; NK, natural killer; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorting; HLA, histocompatibility antigen; AHG-CDC, antihuman globulin-enhanced complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity; GM-CSF, granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor; SD, stable disease; LAK, lymphokine-activated killer. Back

4 S. Visonneau, K. A. Jeglum, and D. Santoli, unpublished data. Back

Received 10/28/99; revised 2/18/00; accepted 2/18/00.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Santoli, D., and Visonneau, S. Breast cancer: immunotherapy and gene therapy. In: M. H. Torosian (ed.), Breast Cancer-Multidisciplinary Management, in press. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2000.
  2. O’Connor R., Cesano A., Lange B., Finan J., Nowell P. C., Clark S. C., Raimondi S. C., Rovera G., Santoli D. Growth factor requirements of childhood acute T-lymphoblastic leukemia: correlation between presence of chromosomal abnormalities and ability to grow permanently in vitro. Blood, 77: 1534-1545, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Cesano A., Santoli D. Two unique human leukemic T-cell lines endowed with a stable cytotoxic function and a different spectrum of target reactivity: analysis and modulation of their lytic mechanisms. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol., 28A: 648-656, 1992.[CrossRef]
  4. Cesano A., Visonneau S., Cioe L., Clark S. C., Rovera G., Santoli D. Reversal of acute myelogenous leukemia in humanized SCID mice using a novel adoptive transfer approach. J. Clin. Investig., 94: 1076-1084, 1994.
  5. Cesano A., Visonneau S., Santoli D. Treatment of experimental glioblastoma with a human major histocompatibility complex nonrestricted cytotoxic T cell line. Cancer Res., 55: 96-101, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Visonneau S., Cesano A., Torosian M., Santoli D. Cell therapy of a highly invasive human breast carcinoma implanted in immuno-deficient (SCID) mice. Clin. Cancer Res., 3: 1491-1500, 1997.[Abstract]
  7. Cesano A., Visonneau S., Rovera G., Santoli D. Synergistic effects of Adriamycin and TALL-104 cell therapy against a human gastric carcinoma in vivo. Anticancer Res., 17: 1887-1892, 1997.[Medline]
  8. Cesano A., Visonneau S., Santoli D. TALL-104 cell therapy of human solid tumors implanted in immunodeficient (SCID) mice. Anticancer Res., 18: 2289-2295, 1998.[Medline]
  9. Cesano A., Visonneau S., Pasquini S., Rovera G., Santoli D. Antitumor efficacy of a human major histocompatibility complex nonrestricted cytotoxic T-cell line (TALL-104) in immunocompetent mice bearing syngeneic leukemia. Cancer Res., 56: 4444-4452, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Cesano A., Visonneau S., Jeglum K. A., Owen J., Wilkinson K., Carner K., Reese L., Santoli D. Phase I clinical trial with a human major histocompatibility complex nonrestricted cytotoxic T-cell line (TALL-104) in dogs with advanced tumors. Cancer Res., 56: 3021-3029, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Visonneau S., Cesano A., Tran T., Jeglum K. A., Santoli D. Successful treatment of canine malignant histiocytosis with the human major histocompatibility complex non-restricted cytotoxic T cell line TALL-104. Clin. Cancer Res., 3: 1789-1797, 1997.[Abstract]
  12. Visonneau S., Cesano A., Jeglum K. A., Santoli D. Adjuvant treatment of canine osteosarcoma with the human cytotoxic T cell line TALL-104. Clin. Cancer Res., 5: 1868-1875, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Cesano A., Wortman J. A., Pourdehnad M., Visonneau S., Mozley D., Bhatnagar A., Alavi A., Santoli D. Effects of a multiple dose administration schedule on the biodistribution of TALL-104 cells in healthy dogs. Implications for adoptive cell therapy of cancer. Int. J. Oncol., 14: 233-244, 1999.
  14. Cesano A., Visonneau S., Tran T., Santoli D. Biodistribution of human MHC non-restricted TALL-104 killer cells in healthy and tumor bearing mice. Int. J. Oncol., 14: 245-251, 1999.[Medline]
  15. Visonneau S., Cesano A., Jeglum K. A., Santoli D. Adoptive therapy of canine metastatic mammary carcinoma with the human MHC non-restricted cytotoxic T-cell line TALL-104. Oncol. Rep., 6: 1181-1188, 1999.[Medline]
  16. Cesano A., Visonneau S., Clark S. C., Santoli D. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of activation of MHC nonrestricted cytotoxic cells by IL-12. J. Immunol., 151: 2943-2957, 1993.[Abstract]
  17. Visonneau S., Cesano A., Torosian M. H., Miller E. J., Santoli D. Growth characteristics and metastatic properties of human breast cancer xenografts in immunodeficient mice. Am. J. Pathol., 152: 1299-311, 1998.[Abstract]
  18. Pei R., Wang G., Tarsitani C., Rojo S., Chen T., Takemura S., Liu A., Lee J. Simultaneous HLA class I and class II antibodies screening with flow cytometry. Hum. Immunol., 59: 313-322, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Zachary A. A., Klingman L., Thorne N., Smerglia A. R., Teresi G. A. Variations of the lymphocytotoxicity test. Transplantation, 60: 498-503, 1995.[Medline]
  20. Cesano A., Santoli D. Inducible expression of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and interferon-{gamma} in two human cytotoxic leukemic T-cell lines. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol., 28A: 657-662, 1992.
  21. Rosenberg S., Lotze M., Muul L., Chang A. E., Avis F. P., Leitman S., Linehan W. M., Robertson C. N., Lee R. E., Rubin J. T., Seipp C. A., Simpson C. G., White D. E. A progress report on the treatment of 157 patients with advanced cancer using lymphokine-activated killer cells and interleukin-2 or high-dose interleukin-2 alone. N. Engl. J. Med., 316: 889-897, 1987.[Abstract]
  22. Law T., Motzer R., Mazundar M., Sell K. W., Walther P. J., O’Connell M. O., Khan A., Vlamis V., Vogelzang N. J., Bajorin D. F. Phase III randomized trial of interleukin-2 with or without lymphokine-activated killer cells in the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell cancer. Cancer (Phila.), 76: 824-832, 1995.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Sparano J. A., Fisher R. I., Weiss G. R., Margolin K., Aronson F. R., Hawkins M. J., Atkins M. B., Dutcher J. P., Gaynor E. R., Boldt D. H. Phase II trials of high-dose interleukin-2 and lymphokine-activated killer cells in advanced breast carcinoma and carcinoma of the lung, ovary, and pancreas, and other tumors. J. Immunother., 16: 216-223, 1994.
  24. Wei W. Z., Heppner G. Breast cancer immunology. Cancer Treat. Res., 83: 395-410, 1996.[Medline]
  25. Porter D. L., Connors J. M., Van Deerlin V., Duffy K. M., McGarigle C., Saidman S., Leonard D., Antin J. A pilot trial of donor leukocyte infusions as primary adoptive immunotherapy for patients with malignancies. J. Clin. Oncol., 17: 1234-1243, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Horowitz M., Gale R., Sondel P., Goldman J., Dersey J., Kolb H., Rimm A., Ringden O., Rozman C., Speck B., Truitt R., Zwann F., Bortin M. Graft-versus-leukemia reactions after bone marrow transplantation. Blood, 75: 555-562, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Porter D., Antin J. Graft-versus-leukemia effect of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation and donor mononuclear cell infusions Winter J. eds. . Blood Stem Cell Transplantation, : 57-86, Kluwer Academic Publishers Norwell, MA 1997.
  28. Ueno N., Rondon G., Mirza N., Geisler D., Anderlini P., Giralt S., Andersson B., Claxton D., Gajewki J., Khouri I., Korbling M., Mehra R., Przepiorka D., Rahman Z., Samuels B., van Besien K., Hortobagyi G., Champlin R. Allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation for poor risk patients with metastatic breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol., 16: 986-993, 1998.[Abstract]
  29. Eibl B., Schwaighofer H., Nachbauer D., Marth C., Gachter A., Knapp R., Bock G., Gassner C., Schiller L., Petersen F., Niederwieser D. Evidence for a graft-versus-tumor effect in a patient with marrow ablative chemotherapy and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for breast cancer. Blood, 88: 1501-1508, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Or R., Ackerstein A., Nagler A., Kapeluschnik J., Naparstek E., Samuel S., Amar A., Bruatbar C., Slavin S. Allogeneic cell-mediated immunotherapy for breast cancer after autologous stem cell transplantation: a clinical pilot study. Cytokines Cell. Mol. Ther., 4: 1-6, 1998.[Medline]
  31. Margolin K. A., Rayer A. A., Hawkins M. J., Atkins M. B., Dutcher J. P., Fisher R. I., Weiss G. R., Doroshow J. H., Jaffe H. S., Roper M., Parkinson D. R., Viernik P. H., Creekmore S. P., Boldt D. H. Interleukin-2 and lymphokine activated killer cells therapy of solid tumors: analysis of toxicity and management guidelines. J. Clin. Oncol., 7: 486-498, 1989.[Abstract]
  32. Stroncek D. F., Fautsch S. K., Lasky L. C., Hurd D. D., Ramsay N. K. C., McCullough J. M. Adverse reactions in patients transfused with cryopreserved marrow. Transplantation, 31: 521-526, 1991.
  33. Davis J. M., Rowley S. D., Braine H. G., Piantadosi S., Santos G. W. Clinical toxicity of cryopreserved bone marrow graft infusion. Blood, 75: 781-786, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Rosenstein M., Ettinghausen J. E., Rosenberg S. A. Extravasation of intravascular fluid mediated by systemic administration of interleukin 2. J. Immunol., 137: 1735-1742, 1986.[Abstract]
  35. Damle N. K., Doyle L. V., Bender J. R., Bradley E. C. Interleukin-2-activated human lymphocytes exhibit enhanced adhesion to normal vascular endothelial cells and cause their lysis. J. Immunol., 138: 1779-1785, 1987.[Abstract]
  36. Kotasek D., Ochoa A. C., Vercellotti G. M., Bach F. H., Jacob H. S. LAK cell-mediated endothelial injury: a mechanism for capillary leak syndrome in patients treated with LAK cells and IL-2. Trans. Assoc. Am. Phys., 100: 21-27, 1987.[Medline]
  37. Cesano A., Visonneau S., Wolfe J. H., Jeglum K. A., Fernandez J., Gillio A., O’Reilly R. J., Santoli D. Toxicological and immunological evaluation of the MHC-non-restricted cytotoxic T cell line TALL-104. Cancer Immunol. Immunother., 44: 125-136, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Huang C. M., Elin R. J., Ruddel M., Silva C., Lotze M. T., Rosenberg S. A. Changes in laboratory results for cancer patients treated with interleukin 2. Clin. Chem., 36: 431-434, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Becker J., Czerny C., Brocker E. Maintenance of clonal anergy by endogenously produced IL-10. Int. Immunol., 6: 1605-1612, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Beissert S., Hosoi J., Grabbe S., Asahina A., Granstein R. D. IL-10 inhibits tumor antigen presentation by epidermal antigen-presenting cells. J. Immunol., 154: 1280-1286, 1995.[Abstract]
  41. Klein B., Levin I., Kfir B., Michaeli M., Shapira J., Klein T. The significance of soluble interleukin-2, soluble interleukin-2 receptors, soluble ICAM-1 and ß2-microglobulin in breast cancer patients. Tumor Biol., 16: 290-296, 1995.
  42. Lissoni P., Barni S., Rovelli F., Viviani S., Maestroni G., Losti A., Tancini G. The biological significance of soluble interleukin-2 receptors in solid tumors. Eur. J. Cancer, 26: 33-36, 1990.
  43. Boldt D. H., Mills B. J., Gemlo B. T., Holden H., Mier J., Pajetta E., McMannis J. D., Escobedo L. V., Sniecinski I., Rayer A. A., Hawkins M. J., Atkins M. B., Ciobanu N., Ellis T. M. Laboratory correlates of adoptive immunotherapy with recombinant interleukin-2 and lymphokine-activated killer cells in humans. Cancer Res., 48: 4409-4416, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Scornik J. C., Brunson M. E., Howard R. J., Pfaff W. W. Alloimmunization, memory, and the interpretation of crossmatch results for renal transplantation. Transplantation, 54: 389-394, 1992.[Medline]
  45. Opelz G., Graver B., Mickey M. R., Teraski P. I. Lymphocytotoxic antibody responses to transfusions in potential kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation, 32: 177-183, 1981.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
C. Brando, S. Mukhopadhyay, E. Kovacs, R. Medina, P. Patel, T. L. Catina, K. S. Campbell, and D. Santoli
Receptors and lytic mediators regulating anti-tumor activity by the leukemic killer T cell line TALL-104
J. Leukoc. Biol., August 1, 2005; 78(2): 359 - 371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
P. Yotnda, B. Savoldo, N. Charlet-Berguerand, C. Rooney, and M. Brenner
Targeted delivery of adenoviral vectors by cytotoxic T cells
Blood, October 15, 2004; 104(8): 2272 - 2280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neuro OncolHome page
G. G. Gomez, S. B. Read, L. E. Gerschenson, D. Santoli, A. Zweifach, and C. A. Kruse
Interactions of the allogeneic effector leukemic T cell line, TALL-104, with human malignant brain tumors
Neuro-oncol, April 1, 2004; 6(2): 83 - 95.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. K. Strair, D. Schaar, D. Medina, M. B. Todd, J. Aisner, R. S. DiPaola, J. Manago, B. Knox, A. Jenkinson, R. Senzon, et al.
Antineoplastic Effects of Partially HLA-Matched Irradiated Blood Mononuclear Cells in Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma
J. Clin. Oncol., October 15, 2003; 21(20): 3785 - 3791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. A. Kruse, S. Visonneau, B. K. Kleinschmidt-DeMasters, C. J. Gup, G. G. Gomez, D. B. Paul, and D. Santoli
The Human Leukemic T-Cell Line, TALL-104, Is Cytotoxic to Human Malignant Brain Tumors and Traffics through Brain Tissue: Implications for Local Adoptive Immunotherapy
Cancer Res., October 1, 2000; 60(20): 5731 - 5739.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar