| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates |
Departments of Medicine [A. L.] and Pathology [S. R.], Veterans Affairs West Los Angeles Hospital and University of California at Los Angeles Medical School, Los Angeles, California 90073; the Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California 90073, Kaiser Permanente Hospital, Woodland Hills, California 91365 [J. W.]; and The Burnham Institute, La Jolla, California 92037 [S. K., M. K., J. C. R.]
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several studies have demonstrated significant expression of BCL-2 and BCL-XL in malignant plasma cells of patients with MM3 (8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15) . Although several small studies have shown that BCL-2 expression does not correlate with decreased responsiveness to therapy (9 , 10) , a recent investigation (16) has demonstrated that it inversely correlates with plasma cell proliferative potential, suggesting it may influence survival independent of chemoresponsiveness. Furthermore, BCL-XL expression is associated with chemoresistance (14) . Because BAX is a major dimerization partner of both BCL-2 and BCL-XL and counters their function, it may also influence clinical outcome. BAX is also expressed in MM cell lines (17) . We, thus, evaluated expression of that proapoptotic protein in myeloma specimens and compared it with BCL-2 expression. Our results indicate a malignancy-specific increase in expression of BAX as well as BCL-2 proteins. Expression of either protein did not correlate with responsiveness to therapy, but in a small cohort of patients whose tumor cells exhibited low BAX expression, long survival was observed.
| PATIENTS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The immunostained BMs from the West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Hospital were obtained from patients who had one of four different diagnoses: reactive polyclonal plasmacytosis secondary to infectious or inflammatory disorders; MGUS/smoldering myeloma; symptomatic myeloma at diagnosis; or symptomatic myeloma at relapse. Patients with myeloma at diagnosis were started on VAD receiving cycles every 4 weeks. Patients who responded were maintained on treatment for at least 1 year. Every other cycle contained 4 instead of 12 days of high-dose dexamethasone. In responding patients with continued presence of paraprotein, VAD was continued until relapse, whereas asymptomatic responding patients, who demonstrated disappearance of paraprotein, had therapy ceased and were followed until relapse. Patients who reached a cumulative dose of Adriamycin between 450 and 550 mg/m2 had that drug terminated. Eighty % of patients received at least 80% of the planned dose of VAD.
Patients with myeloma at relapse had initially responded to VAD and subsequently demonstrated clinical relapse at the time of biopsy. After BM biopsy, they were retreated with either M&P, high-dose dexamethasone alone, or other regimens.
Active myeloma was defined in symptomatic patients according to the Myeloma Task Force (18) . Patients with MGUS were diagnosed according to the criteria of Kyle et al. (19) . They have been followed for a mean of 4 years without evolution to myeloma. Patients with smoldering myeloma were defined according to prior criteria (20) .
Isolation of Fresh Myeloma Cells.
After Ficoll-Hypaque separation of BM cells, myeloma cells were
further separated on an immunoadsorption column as described previously
(21)
, using biotinylated anti-CD38 antibody to isolate
high CD38-expressing cells.
Western Blot.
As described previously (22)
, cells were lysed in lysis
buffer, and lysates were cleared at 14,000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C.
Proteins were separated by 12.5% SDS-PAGE and transferred to
polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. Membranes were then
incubated with rabbit antihuman BAX antibody (from Dr. J Reed, Burnham
Institute, La Jolla, CA) for 1 h. After four washes, the membranes
were overlaid with 1 µg/ml horseradish peroxidase-labeled goat
antirabbit IgG antibody (Amersham), and protein bands were detected
with an enhanced chemiluminescence system.
IHC.
BM biopsies obtained at the West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Hospital
were fixed in formalin, and those obtained from Kaiser Hospital were
fixed in Bouins solution. IHC was performed as reported previously
(6
, 23)
using a microwave antigen retrieval method and
biotinylated goat antirabbit IgG, followed by an avidin-biotin complex
reagent (Vector Laboratories, Inc.) with horseradish peroxidase.
Colorimetric detection of bound antibody was achieved with
diaminobenzidine, followed by counterstaining with hematoxylin.
Expression of BAX or BCL-2 was graded on an arbitrary scale and
designated 0, 1+, 2+, 3+, or 4+. Determination of frequency of
expression used the following guidelines: 0, 0% staining of plasma
cells; 1+, 110% of cells; 2+, 1150% of cells; 3+, 5190% of
cells; and 4+, 91100% of cells. Intensity of staining was similarly
graded in an arbitrary fashion with scores of 04+. Stained specimens
were examined in blinded fashion by two of the authors (S. R. and
A. L.), and each observer initially independently assessed expression.
In 94% of cases, identical immunopositive frequency scores were
initially obtained by the two observers. In 87% of cases, identical
intensity scores were initially obtained. After further examination and
discussion, agreement was reached as to the degree of expression in all
cases. Negative controls consisted of simultaneously stained
preparations, in which preimmune antiserum was used instead of the
BCL-2/BAX antibody, or the antibodies were specifically preabsorbed
with specific BCL-2 or BAX peptide. These controls were uniformly
negative for immunostaining. BCL-2expressing BM lymphocytes, and
BAX-expressing erythroid and myeloid precursors served as internal
positive controls. The anti-BAX and anti-BCL-2 antibodies were
generated as described previously (6
, 23)
. The anti-BAX
antibody was specific for a peptide corresponding to amino acids 4361
of the human BAX protein. The anti-BCL-2 antibody was specific for
amino acids 4154 of human BCL-2 protein. Frequency of PCNA expression
was the percentage of positive-staining plasma cells, determined by
counting at least 250 plasma cells from three different areas in BMs
from myeloma patients. For MGUS patients, only 50100 plasma cells
were enumerated to determine frequency of PCNA staining. Small numbers
of PCNA-expressing immature normoblasts and WBC precursors served as
internal positive controls. The anti-PCNA antibody was monoclonal
antibody PC-10, purchased from DAKOpatts (Copenhagen, Denmark). These
studies were approved by Human Subject Protection Committees of the
West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs and Kaiser Permanente Hospitals in
accord with assurances filed with and approved by the Department of
Health and Human Services.
Clinical Information.
Clinical characteristics, response to therapy, duration of response,
and survival were determined by chart review. Response was determined
by examination of follow-up protein electrophoretic studies 49 months
after initiation of chemotherapy. For the purposes of this study,
response was defined as at least a 50% reduction in serum paraprotein
or a 75% reduction in urine paraprotein for patients with light chain
myeloma. These reductions in M protein had to last for at least 3
months to be considered a response. For a few patients with
nonsecreting myeloma, response was defined as a decrease in plasma cell
marrow infiltration to <5% on repeat BM examination. Response
duration for responders was calculated from the date of initiation of
therapy until the date of documented recurrence. Survival was
calculated from the date of BM biopsy until death or last follow-up
examination. Survival and response duration data were censored as of
August 1, 1997.
Statistics.
Differences in BCL-2/BAX expression between the four patient groups
were evaluated by comparing group means with the Kruskal-Wallace
procedure. Differences in RRs between high and low BCL-2- or
BAX-expressing cases were evaluated by the Spearman
Correlation.
Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to relapse or time to death (data
censored as of August 1, 1997) were calculated within high- or
low-expressing groups, and the groups were compared by the log-rank
test. Differences in frequency of PCNA staining were evaluated by the
t test.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
. Additional
studies demonstrated that BAX expression in myeloma cells was not
altered by exposure to IL-6. This was demonstrated in five freshly
obtained myeloma plasma cell samples and several myeloma cell lines.
Samples from three of five patients are shown in Fig. 1B
|
|
|
|
|
We performed a cross-sectional comparison of group III (myeloma at
diagnosis) to group IV (at relapse after therapy), assessing whether
any therapy-induced adaptations in BCL-2 or BAX expression were
apparent. BCL-2 expression remained similar (Table 2)
, but BAX
expression modestly decreased in plasma cells of patients at relapse
(Fig. 2)
. This decrease did not reach statistical significance.
We also attempted to correlate expression with clinical characteristics of the four major patient groups. Of 17 patients with reactive plasmacytosis (group I), 8 were diagnosed with AIDS, 4 had chronic infection, 4 had chronic liver disease, and 1 had an unspecified collagen vascular disease. No significant differences in BCL-2 or BAX expression were found between these subgroups. Of the 29 patients in group II, 18 had MGUS and 11 had smoldering myeloma. Again, no significant differences in expression between these two groups were found. Of the 33 patients in group III, 28 were Durie-Salmon stage III and 5 were stage II, whereas all 25 patients in group IV were stage III. In these cohorts, no significant differences in expression were seen in stage II versus stage III patients, nor were there correlations between expression and ß2-microglobulin levels, serum albumin, or hemoglobin levels (data not shown). Attempts to correlate BAX/BCL-2 expression with degree of plasma cell infiltration in BMs of each patient group were likewise unsuccessful.
Frequency of expression (percentage of immunopositive tumor cells) correlated well with intensity of expression for both proteins (not shown). However, no correlation between BCL-2 and BAX expression was observed in either frequency (percentage) or intensity of immunostaining (not shown).
BAX/BCL-2 Expression versus Clinical Outcome.
For correlations with clinical outcome, only BMs from patients with
active myeloma were evaluated. This cohort of patients consisted of 102
patients diagnosed between 1989 and 1996 at two hospitals, the West Los
Angeles Veterans Affairs Hospital and Kaiser Permanente Hospital
(Woodland Hills, CA). The Kaiser Hospital patients (n =
43) were all biopsied at diagnosis. All of these patients were stage
III and were treated with M&P as induction therapy. The Veterans
Affairs Hospital patients (n = 59) were either biopsied
at diagnosis (n = 30) or on relapse (n = 29). All Veterans Affairs patients who were biopsied at initial
diagnosis were treated with VAD as induction chemotherapy. Patients who
were biopsied at relapse were then treated with second-line therapy
consisting of either M&P, high-dose dexamethasone, or other agents used
alone or in combination. Because the Kaiser and West Los Angeles
Veterans Affairs patients were treated differently and their BMs were
processed differently (different fixative), they were analyzed
separately below.
Response to Therapy.
Overall, in these 102 patients, there was no significant correlation
between BAX expression and response to therapy. The lack of correlation
was also true when the three patient groups were evaluated separately,
and low-scored immunostaining patients (02+, 050% positively
stained plasma cells) were compared with high-scored immunostaining
patients (34+, 51100% positively stained plasma cells). Of 43
Kaiser patients initially induced with M&P, the initial RR in those
with low plasma cell BAX expression was 65%, and the RR in the high
BAX expression group was 57%. Of 30 Veterans Affairs patients
initially treated with VAD as induction chemotherapy, the RR in
patients with low BAX expression was 58% and, in those with high
expression, it was 67%. In 29 Veterans Affairs patients treated at
relapse with varying regimens, the RR was 39% in low BAX-expressing
groups versus 36% in high BAX-expressing groups. There were
no significant differences in RR between low- versus
high-expressing cases in any of these three groups, as determined by
the Spearman
correlation. When the data were dichotomized
differently by comparing scores of 0 and 1+ (as low-expressing cases)
to 2, 3, and 4+ (as high-expressing cases), there were still no
significant differences detected. Finally, comparisons of BAX
expression assessed blindly by intensity of expression (02+
versus 3+, 4+, or 01+ versus 24+) rather than
frequency of expression also demonstrated no significant differences.
The situation was similar for BCL-2 expression. There were no significant differences in RRs between low versus high BCL-2-expressing patient cohorts for the three patient groups. The RRs were 67% versus 60% [low (02+)- versus high (34+)-expressing groups] in Kaiser patients initially induced with M&P, 50% versus 65% in Veterans Affairs patients induced with VAD, and 38% versus 38% in Veterans Affairs patients treated at relapse. As described above for BAX, when BCL-2 frequency of expression data were dichotomized differently (01+ versus 24+) or when expression was characterized by intensity of immunostaining, there were still no significant differences.
Response Duration.
A significantly (P = 0.0073 by log-rank method)
decreased remission duration was seen in Veterans Affairs patients
studied at relapse (median duration of remission, 11 months) compared
with either Veterans Affairs patients (median, 24 months) or Kaiser
patients (median, 27 months) studied at diagnosis. This was anticipated
because these results represent the second remission for Veterans
Affairs patients studied at relapse, and these remissions tend to be
shorter than initial remissions. However, BAX or BCL-2 expression had
no bearing on response duration. This lack of correlation with
immunostaining was true whether intensity or frequency of expression
was assessed and in all three patient cohorts. Similarly, no
significant differences were found when Cox regression analyses or
log-rank tests were performed. The log-rank test were initially
dichotomized between low expression scores of 0, 1, and 2
versus high scores of 3 and 4. We again attempted to
dichotomize the data differently by comparing scores 0 and 1 (as
low-expressing cases) to 2, 3, and 4 (as high-expressing cases), and
still no significant differences were found.
Survival.
The median survival of Kaiser Hospital patients, calculated from date
of BM biopsy (which was the date of diagnosis) was 36 months. A similar
median survival (32 months) was detected in Veterans Affairs Hospital
patients likewise biopsied at diagnosis. As expected, the survival of
Veterans Affairs Hospital patients, calculated from the date of BM
biopsy upon clinical relapse, was lower (23 months). For all three of
these patient cohorts, the level of BCL-2 expression, either assessed
by frequency or intensity of immunostaining, had no bearing on
survival. However, a cohort of patients with very low BAX expression
(scores of 01+) demonstrated an unexpected prolonged survival. Of 43
Kaiser patients biopsied at diagnosis, 10 had BMs with 01+ BAX
expression by frequency of immunostaining. The median survival of this
group was 60 months, whereas the median survival of patients whose BAX
frequency scores were 24+ was 28 months (Fig. 4
, top; P =
0.0001 by log-rank method). A similar significant difference was
detected in Veterans Affairs patients biopsied at diagnosis. Of these
30 patients, 9 had BMs with 01+ BAX frequency of expression. The
median survival of these patients has not been reached, whereas the
median survival of patients whose BAX frequency scores were 24+ was
20 months (Fig. 4
, middle; P = 0.0003). Of
29 Veterans Affairs patients studied at the time of relapse, seven
patients demonstrated low BAX frequency scores in their immunostained
BMs. Their median survival has also not been reached, whereas patients
with BMs demonstrating BAX frequency scores of 24+ had a median
survival of 15 months (Fig. 4
, bottom; P =
0.0001). A similar significant difference in survival was seen between
low (01+) versus high (24+) BAX expression scores when
immunostaining intensity was evaluated. This difference was significant
with Ps of 0.0065, 0.008, and 0.0007 for Kaiser patients,
Veterans Affairs at diagnosis patients, and Veterans Affairs at relapse
patients, respectively (survival curves not shown). However, when
survival of patients with BAX frequency scores of 2+ were compared with
those with scores of 34+, no significant difference in survival was
noted among any of the three cohorts of patients. Thus, a very low
01+ score specifically identified a subgroup of patients with long
survival. When we compared the clinical characteristics of these low
BAX-expressing cohorts (scores of 01+) to the remaining patients in
their corresponding groups, there was no significant difference in
serum ß2-microglobulin, albumin, and hemoglobin
levels or in degree of plasma cell marrow infiltration.
|
Plasma cells in BMs of patients with MGUS or smoldering myeloma were
rarely positive for PCNA expression (mean, 1.3 ± 1%; Fig. 5
). In contrast, the percentage of
malignant plasma cells immunostained with PCNA antibody was 5.73 ± 3.5% (mean ± SD; median, 3%) in the MM at diagnosis group
and 10.5 ± 4% (median, 11%) in MM cases studied upon relapse
(Fig. 5)
. Both of these latter values are significantly
(P < 0.05) higher than the values in the
MGUS/smoldering MM group. In addition, the frequency of PCNA staining
was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in the patients
studied at relapse when compared with those studied at diagnosis.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The results in Table 2
also indicate that BCL-2 expression is increased
in myeloma cells. This is consistent with a recent investigation by
Miguel-Garcia et al. (29)
. The explanation for
a malignancy-specific dysregulated BCL-2 expression in myeloma is
unknown. The 14;18 chromosomal translocation is not present in myeloma,
and no other structural abnormalities of the BCL-2 gene have
been reported (13
, 30)
. Because activation of wild-type
p53 down-regulates BCL-2 levels (31)
, mutated p53 in
myeloma cells with loss of function may result in up-regulated
expression. However, p53 mutations are relatively rare in myeloma,
occurring in only
1015% of cases (32)
. One possible
explanation is that BCL-2 gene amplification occurs during
the course of evolution from nonmalignant plasma cells through
MGUS/smoldering myeloma to active myeloma. Evidence of BCL-2
gene amplification has been detected in some BCL-2-overexpressing
non-Hodgkin lymphoma specimens that are not associated with (14
, 18)
chromosome translocations (33)
.
Although BCL-2 expression did not correlate with BAX expression in the
entire cohort of patients, the alterations in expression of each
protein mirrored alterations in the other, i.e., a
generalized increase in expression as plasma cells became monoclonal
(i.e., in MGUS/smoldering myeloma) and then truly malignant.
Thus, it is unclear whether dysregulated BCL-2 expression occurs during
the course of tumor evolution with concomitant increases in BAX
expression to retain a comparable BCL-2:BAX ratio within the plasma
cells or vice versa. Another possible scenario is that BCL-2
expression is initially dysregulated, and because of the stabilizing
effect of BCL-2 on BAX protein with resulting increased half-life
(34)
, increased BAX expression ensues. However, the fact
that BCL-2-transfected myeloma cells, ectopically expressing high
levels of BCL-2, show no alteration in BAX expression (35)
argues against this possibility. Finally, IL-6 exposure does not affect
BAX expression in myeloma cell lines or freshly obtained specimens
(Fig. 1)
, indicating that increased concentrations of this cytokine
occurring during evolution of this malignancy is not likely an
explanation for up-regulation of BAX.
No relationship was detected between either BAX or BCL-2 expression and RR to chemotherapy or duration of response. We also failed to detect significant correlations between BCL-2 expression and survival. A lack of correlation between high BCL-2 expression and decreased chemoresponsiveness and survival is consistent with previous studies, which evaluated smaller numbers of patients. In fact, Ong et al. (10) found higher frequency of BCL-2 plasma cell immunostaining in patients with long survival compared with those with shorter survival. Moreover, in another study, BCL-2 had no effect on responsiveness to M&P in 63 newly diagnosed patients (9) , although BCL-2 expression in MM cells correlated with resistance to IFN.
In contrast to the results with BCL-2, however, BAX expression inversely correlated with survival. This was true for analyses of BAX intensity or percentage of BAX immunopositivity for all three patient cohorts. The effect on survival was not attributable to any influence on RRs or response duration. A similar relationship between BAX expression and cancer survival has been found in a limited number of studies in other tumor models (36, 37, 38, 39) . One possible explanation for this inverse correlation was that lower BAX expression in these subgroups of patients was simply a surrogate marker for lower BCL-2 expression, given the fact that BCL-2 alterations mirrored BAX alterations and that the BCL-2 assay might not have been able to distinguish significant differences in expression occurring in the high range of scores. We consider this explanation unlikely because a correlation between lower BCL-2 expression and prolonged survival should probably be associated with increased chemoresponsiveness and/or response duration (which it was not), given that low BCL-2 expression as a favorable indicator should be associated with increased apoptosis of treated tumor cells.
It is also possible that the prognostic importance of BAX expression is related to the corresponding BCL-2 expression. For example, in ovarian cancer patients (37) , BAX expression is associated with poor outcome in general but is more important as a poor prognostic indicator when corresponding BCL-2 expression is high. In a similar study of patients with diffuse large cell lymphoma (39) , low BAX expression was associated with lower survival when corresponding BCL-2 expression was low. However, in the patient cohort with high tumor cell BCL-2 expression, a situation similar to our patients with active myeloma, low BAX expression was significantly associated with enhanced survival, similar to what we saw.
Because BCL-2 overexpression inhibits proliferation (40) and an inverse relationship between BCL-2 expression and proliferative potential has been demonstrated in tumor cells in several different human tumor models (41 , 42) , we also considered the possibility that the reverse situation exists for BAX expression, i.e., a direct correlation between expression and tumor cell proliferation. A recent in vitro study (28) and clinical results in breast and ovarian cancer patients (36 , 37) support this possibility. Thus, low BAX expression in myeloma cells might correlate with low tumor cell proliferation, therefore explaining the prolonged survival in this patient cohort. To test this hypothesis in our patients, we stained BM sections for PCNA as a marker for proliferation. Plasma cell PCNA positivity was very low in MGUS/smoldering myeloma BMs, significantly higher in active myeloma BMs, and higher in myeloma BMs studied at relapse compared with BMs studied at diagnosis. These results are consistent with prior studies (43 , 44) that evaluated BM plasma cell proliferative status by immunostaining with Ki-67 antibody. However, we were unable to demonstrate a correlation between low BAX expression and low proliferative potential in this study. Thus, low BAX expression may correlate with another important survival parameter of the tumor-host interaction, which is unrelated to plasma cell proliferation.
In summary, our study clearly demonstrates an increase in BCL-2 and BAX expression in myeloma plasma cells when compared with reactive plasma cells. Plasma cells obtained from MGUS/smoldering myeloma patients demonstrate intermediate expression. BCL-2/BAX expression did not correlate with RRs or response duration, but subsets of patients with very low BAX expression demonstrated long survival.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported by NIH Grants CA 69381 and CA 551164,
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Grant U10CA2115, and research funds
of the Veterans Administration, including the Research Enhancement
Awards Program, entitled "Cancer Gene Medicine." ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, at Hematology-Oncology, W111H, Veterans Affairs West Los
Angeles Hospital, 11301 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90073.
Phone: (310) 268-3622; Fax: (310) 268-4908. ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: MM, multiple
myeloma; MGUS, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance; VAD,
vincristine, Adriamycin, and dexamethasone; M&P, melphalan and
prednisone; IHC, immunohistochemistry; PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear
antigen; IL, interleukin; RR, response rate; BM, bone marrow. ![]()
Received 12/29/99; revised 3/13/00; accepted 3/13/00.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
perturbs T cell development and affects cell cycle entry of T cells. EMBO J., 15: 6991-7000, 1996.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Paneesha, K. Hawkins, F. Davies, L. Hooper, J. Starczynski, C. Pepper, G. Morgan, C. Fegan, and G. Pratt BAX UTR G (-248) A Polymorphism Has No Impact on Survival in Patients with Multiple Myeloma. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts), November 16, 2006; 108(11): 5022 - 5022. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Evens, S. Prachand, B. Shi, M. Paniaqua, L. I. Gordon, and R. B. Gartenhaus Imexon-Induced Apoptosis in Multiple Myeloma Tumor Cells Is Caspase-8 Dependent Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2004; 10(4): 1481 - 1491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |