| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Experimental Therapeutics, Preclinical Pharmacology |
Biologie des Interactions Neurones/Glie, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U-495, Université Pierre Marie Curie, and Fédération de neurologie Mazarin [A. F. C., J. X., J.-Y. D.], and Laboratoire de Neuropathologie Raymond Escourolles [K. M.], Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75651 Paris Cedex 13, France
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, IFN-
, or IL-12 (1, 2, 3, 4)
. These immunogenic
properties have been linked to a much higher frequency of unmethylated
CpG dinucleotides (CpG motifs) in bacterial DNA than in vertebrate DNA
(5)
. CpG motifs flanked by two 5' purines and two 3'
pyrimidines appear as the most potent immunostimulatory sequences
(5)
. Synthetic ODNs containing such hexamers have
immunological effects similar to those seen with bacterial DNA and are
promising vaccine adjuvants (5, 6, 7)
. Malignant glioma patients exhibit depressed in vitro and in vivo reactivity of peripheral blood and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (8 , 9) , which has been attributed to the decreased IL-2 sensitivity of CD4+ lymphocytes (10) and local secretion, by glioma cells, of the immunosuppressive factors, transforming growth factor-ß2, prostaglandin E2, and IL-10 (11, 12, 13) . Treatment with an immunostimulatory agent that would reverse this immunosuppressive tumor environment might allow the rejection of glioma cells by the immune system. Thus, we evaluated whether an ODN with a CpG-ODN could lead to glioma rejections. Immunocompetent rats were inoculated with syngeneic CNS1 glioma cells and subsequently treated with CpG-ODNs directly into the tumor bed to bypass the blood-brain barrier (14) .
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Glioma Cell Line and in Vitro Toxicity Assays.
The murine glioma cell line CNS-1 (15)
, kindly provided by
Dr. W. F. Hickey (Hanover, NH), was cultivated in RPMI 1640
supplemented with 10% FCS (Boehringer, Meylan, France). For toxicity
assays, 10,000 CNS-1 cells were plated in 25-cm2
culture flasks, and ODNs were added (at 5 x
10-6 or 5 x 10-7
M) on day 1 of culture. The cells were harvested on day 3
by trypsinization and counted on a Malassez hematocytometer. Cell
viability was then checked by trypan blue exclusion. The experiments
were performed in triplicate, and results were expressed as the
means ± SD.
Tumor Implantation and in Vivo Treatment.
For intracerebral tumor implantation, anesthetized 6- to 7-week-old
male Lewis rats (CERJ, Lyon, France) were placed in a stereotactic
frame, and a burr hole was drilled 2 mm posterior and 4 mm lateral to
the bregma. The brain was punctured by a Hamilton syringe, and the
needle was inserted 5 mm deep. Viable glioma cells (1 x
105), suspended in 10 µl of RPMI 1640, were
injected. The ODNs, dissolved to the appropriate concentration in 7
µl of saline, were injected similarly.
Six-week-old male nude mice (CERJ, Lyon, France) were injected s.c.
with 105 CNS1 cells into the right flank. Five
days later, mice were injected into the tumor bed either with 50 µl
sodium chloride or 100 µg of ODNs dissolved in 50 µl of saline.
Tumor volumes were assessed with a caliper every 4 days using the
formula:
/6 x length x width2
(16)
.
Histology/Immunohistochemistry.
For histology and histochemistry analysis, the rats were killed just
before the expected date of death. After induction of anesthesia, the
animals underwent intracardiac perfusion with 2% paraformaldehyde in
PBS. The brains were then fixed for 2 h in the same fixative and
either embedded in paraffin for staining with H&E or snap-frozen and
stored at -80°C. For immunohistochemistry, frozen sections (10 µm)
were thawed, incubated at room temperature for 1 h with 10%
normal goat serum (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA), and
subsequently incubated for 2 h with the primary antibody. The
following primary antibodies (all from Serotec, Oxford, UK) were used:
OX8 (1:100) directed against CD8-positive T cells; 3.2.3 (1:100)
against NK cells, and ED1 (1:500) against microglial cells and
macrophages. The sections were incubated additionally for 1 h with
FITC-conjugated goat antimouse IgG1 (1:50;
Clinisciences, Montrouge, France) and were examined under a Leica
fluorescent microscope. Quantitative analysis of labeled cells was
performed using two different sections for each sample. In each
section, the number of positive cells in three random fields measuring
0.135 mm2 were counted by an investigator who was
blinded to the animal history.
Statistics.
Statistical significance for survival was assessed using the
Kaplan-Meier analysis. Comparisons of cellular infiltrates were done by
the Mann-Whitney U test.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Second Challenge with CNS1 Cells in Rats Cured by CpG-ODNs.
Twelve weeks after completion of the initial treatment, some of the
surviving animals (n = 5) that had not been killed for
histological evaluation were subjected to a second intracranial tumor
challenge with 106 CNS1 cells. All of them
survived without any treatment, whereas all of the control rats
(n = 4) died (P < 0.001; Fig. 3
). Histopathological studies did not
reveal any evidence of residual tumor cells in the surviving rats.
|
In Vitro Toxicity of CpG-ODNs.
To investigate whether the effect of CpG-ODNs could be mediated by a
direct toxicity on glioma cells, 10,000 CNS1 cells were plated in
25-cm2 culture flasks. CpG-ODN or IMM-ODN was
added at two different concentrations (5 x
10-6 or 5 x 10-7
M) on day 1 of culture, and the cells were counted on day
3. No inhibition of proliferation was seen in either of the
concentrations tested when compared with the controls (mean ± SD:
97,000 ± 1,500 for control; 73,000 ± 1,000 and 88,000 ± 1,500 for 5 x 10-6 M and
5 x 10-7 M CpG-ODN,
respectively; 77,000 ± 2,000 and 99,000 ± 1,000 for 5 x 10-6 M and 5 x 10
M CpG-ODN, respectively).
Treatment with CpG-ODNs in Nude Mice.
To further assess that the effects of CpG-ODN did not result from a
direct cytotoxicity on CNS1 cells but rather involved the immune
system, nude mice that had been implanted s.c. with
105 CNS1 cells were divided into two groups
(n = 4 in each) and were injected on day 5 at the same
location with a single injection of either 50 µl of sodium chloride
or 100 µg of CpG-ODN. No significant differences in tumor volumes
measured on day 12 were seen between the two groups (mean tumor
volume ± SE: 628 ± 158 mm3 for
saline; 613 ± 74 mm3 for CpG-ODN;
P = 0.56).
Recruitment of Macrophage/Microglial, NK, and CD8
Tumor-infiltrating Cells by CpG-ODN Injections.
To study the effects of CpG-ODN on tumors, rats implanted on day 0 with
CNS1 were injected with CpG-ODN or with saline on day 5. The rats were
killed on day 6, and the brains were removed for histological
evaluation. On H&E-stained brain tissue sections, CpG-ODN-treated
animals showed intratumoral infiltration and large areas of apoptotic
cells at the periphery of the tumors, whereas the controls showed less
infiltration and no apoptosis (Fig. 4)
.
The number of OX8- (CD8 T cells), 3.2.3- (NK cells), and ED1-
(macrophages and microglial cells) positive tumor-infiltrating cells
were, respectively, 4.5-, 4.4-, and 3-fold higher in CpG-ODN-treated
animals than those cells in the controls (mean of positive cells per
0.135-mm2 field ± SE: 132 ± 9
versus 29 ± 7 for OX8+ cells, P <
0.05; 71 ± 3 versus 16 ± 5 for
3.2.3+ cells, P < 0.05; and
207 ± 23 versus 68 ± 19 for ED1+ cells,
P < 0.05; Figs. 4
and 5
). No significant differences were seen
between control animals injected with sodium chloride and
noninstrumented animals killed on day 6 after tumor inoculation (mean
of positive cells per 0.135-mm2 field ± SE:
35 ± 9 for OX8+ cells; 20 ± 5 for 3.2.3+ cells; and 82 ± 19 for ED1+ cells). Histological evaluation of the surrounding
parenchyma and contralateral hemisphere was normal, except for
scattered reactive microglial cells in the ipsilateral hemisphere of
the CpG-ODN-injected animals.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The mechanisms responsible for the antitumoral effects could result from a direct cytotoxicity of CpG-ODNs. However, no cytotoxicity on CNS1 cells was detected in vitro, and their antitumoral effects were abrogated in nude mice, which strongly suggests that eradication of glioma cells were immune-mediated. The increased tumoral infiltration with macrophage/microglial cells, CD8, and NK lymphocytes seen after CpG-ODN injections when compared with the control group support this hypothesis. Interestingly, rats that were cured by CpG-ODN injections were protected additionally against a new tumor challenge, which showed that a long-term immunity was primed. CpG-ODN has been reported to induce endogenous release of IL-12 by macrophages (4) . Because IL-12 displays antitumor effects in murine glioma models (20 , 21) , the CpG-ODNs antitumoral effects could be mediated, at least in part, by IL-12 secretion. CpG-ODNs carry out the advantage over IL-12 alone to trigger a sustained expression of IL-12 for at least 8 days (22) , whereas the half-life of exogenous IL-12 is <10 h (23) .
Despite the susceptibility of the Lewis strain to develop experimental acute encephalomyelitis, rats injected with CpG-ODN showed no short- or long-term neurological impairment. Histological studies of the brains of cured animals showed no abnormalities other than enlarged ventricles in the vicinity of the original tumor sites. Direct injections of CpG-ODN in normal rat brains yielded only minimal necrosis along the needle tracks (data not shown). Although additional toxicological studies are mandatory, CpG-ODN injections seemed thus far to have no deleterious effect on the normal brain parenchyma.
CpG-ODNs are promising adjuvants for immunization against selected antigens such as hepatitis B (6 , 24) or for immunization against a tumor antigen in a murine lymphoma model (25) . Our data show that direct injections of CpG-ODN alone into tumors represent a simple means of achieving therapeutic effects without the need for selection and purification of tumor antigens. Human gliomas display a locally invasive pattern of growth and rarely metastasize, which makes local treatment clinically relevant. Intratumoral injections of CpG-ODN, therefore, may represent a new immunotherapeutic approach in gliomas and warrant additional studies in other malignancies.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported by Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de
Paris, Université Paris VI, and Institut National de la
Santé et de la Recherche Médicale. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, at Fédération de neurologie Mazarin, 47
Boulevard de lhôpital, Hôpital de la
Salpêtrière, 75013 Paris, France. Fax:
011-33-1-44-23-81-85; E-mail: antoine.carpentier{at}psl.ap-hop-paris.fr ![]()
3 A. F. C. and J. X. contributed equally to
this work. ![]()
4 The abbreviations used are: NK, natural killer;
IL, interleukin; ODN, phosphorothioate oligodeoxynucleotide;
CpG-ODN, ODN with an immunostimulatory CpG motif. ![]()
Received 11/30/99; revised 3/ 6/00; accepted 3/ 7/00.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
in vivo and increases the toxicity of lipopolysaccharides. J. Immunol., 156: 4570-4575, 1996.[Abstract]
production by stimulation of interleukin-12 and tumor necrosis factor-
. Cell. Immunol., 167: 72-78, 1996.[CrossRef][Medline]
production is dependent on macrophage secretion of IL-12. Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol., 84: 185-193, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Hamzah, J. G. Altin, T. Herringson, C. R. Parish, G. J. Hammerling, H. O'Donoghue, and R. Ganss Targeted Liposomal Delivery of TLR9 Ligands Activates Spontaneous Antitumor Immunity in an Autochthonous Cancer Model J. Immunol., July 15, 2009; 183(2): 1091 - 1098. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Thaxton, R. Romero, and S. Sharma TLR9 Activation Coupled to IL-10 Deficiency Induces Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes J. Immunol., July 15, 2009; 183(2): 1144 - 1154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Ampollini, A. Soltermann, E. Felley-Bosco, D. Lardinois, S. Arni, R. F. Speck, W. Weder, and I. Opitz Immuno-chemotherapy reduces recurrence of malignant pleural mesothelioma: an experimental setting Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2009; 35(3): 457 - 462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. M. Grauer, J. W. Molling, E. Bennink, L. W. J. Toonen, R. P. M. Sutmuller, S. Nierkens, and G. J. Adema TLR Ligands in the Local Treatment of Established Intracerebral Murine Gliomas J. Immunol., November 15, 2008; 181(10): 6720 - 6729. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Xiong, S. Gharagozlou, I. Vengco, W. Chen, and J. R. Ohlfest Effective CpG Immunotherapy of Breast Carcinoma Prevents but Fails to Eradicate Established Brain Metastasis Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2008; 14(17): 5484 - 5493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Wang, E. R. Rayburn, W. Wang, E. R. Kandimalla, S. Agrawal, and R. Zhang Chemotherapy and chemosensitization of non-small cell lung cancer with a novel immunomodulatory oligonucleotide targeting Toll-like receptor 9. Mol. Cancer Ther., June 1, 2006; 5(6): 1585 - 1592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Carpentier, F. Laigle-Donadey, S. Zohar, L. Capelle, A. Behin, A. Tibi, N. Martin-Duverneuil, M. Sanson, L. Lacomblez, S. Taillibert, et al. Phase 1 trial of a CpG oligodeoxynucleotide for patients with recurrent glioblastoma Neuro-oncol, January 1, 2006; 8(1): 60 - 66. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Luyer, W. A. Buurman, M. Hadfoune, G. Speelmans, J. Knol, J. A. Jacobs, C. H. C. Dejong, A. J. M. Vriesema, and J. W. M. Greve Strain-Specific Effects of Probiotics on Gut Barrier Integrity following Hemorrhagic Shock Infect. Immun., June 1, 2005; 73(6): 3686 - 3692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Garbi, B. Arnold, S. Gordon, G. J. Hammerling, and R. Ganss CpG Motifs as Proinflammatory Factors Render Autochthonous Tumors Permissive for Infiltration and Destruction J. Immunol., May 15, 2004; 172(10): 5861 - 5869. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Lonsdorf, H. Kuekrek, B. V. Stern, B. O. Boehm, P. V. Lehmann, and M. Tary-Lehmann Intratumor CpG-Oligodeoxynucleotide Injection Induces Protective Antitumor T Cell Immunity J. Immunol., October 15, 2003; 171(8): 3941 - 3946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Hartmann, B. Wollenberg, S. Rothenfusser, M. Wagner, D. Wellisch, B. Mack, T. Giese, O. Gires, S. Endres, and G. Hartmann Identification and Functional Analysis of Tumor-Infiltrating Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells in Head and Neck Cancer Cancer Res., October 1, 2003; 63(19): 6478 - 6487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Weigel, D. A. Rodeberg, A. M. Krieg, and B. R. Blazar CpG Oligodeoxynucleotides Potentiate the Antitumor Effects of Chemotherapy or Tumor Resection in an Orthotopic Murine Model of Rhabdomyosarcoma Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2003; 9(8): 3105 - 3114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Baines and E. Celis Immune-mediated Tumor Regression Induced by CpG-containing Oligodeoxynucleotides Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2003; 9(7): 2693 - 2700. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Wang and A. M. Krieg Synergy between CpG- or non-CpG DNA and specific antigen for B cell activation Int. Immunol., February 1, 2003; 15(2): 223 - 231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. Dalpke, M. K.-H. Schafer, M. Frey, S. Zimmermann, J. Tebbe, E. Weihe, and K. Heeg Immunostimulatory CpG-DNA Activates Murine Microglia J. Immunol., May 15, 2002; 168(10): 4854 - 4863. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Auf, A. F. Carpentier, L. Chen, C. Le Clanche, and J.-Y. Delattre Implication of Macrophages in Tumor Rejection Induced by CpG-oligodeoxynucleotides Without Antigen Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2001; 7(11): 3540 - 3543. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Blazar, A. M. Krieg, and P. A. Taylor Synthetic unmethylated cytosine-phosphate-guanosine oligodeoxynucleotides are potent stimulators of antileukemia responses in naive and bone marrow transplant recipients Blood, August 15, 2001; 98(4): 1217 - 1225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |