
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Clinical Trials |
Department of Medicine III, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu 431-3192 [R.O., K.O.]; Department of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 734-0037 [Y. Y.,T. To.]; Department of Urology, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka 537-8511 [T. Ki.,T. Ko.]; First Department of Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo 157-0065 [M. S.]; Department of Dermatology, Saitama Medical School, Saitama 350-0495 [Y. K., S. I.]; Department of Urology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo 170-8455 [I. F.]; First Department of Surgery, Okayama University School of Medicine, Okayama 700-0914 [A. G.]; Second Department of Surgery, Gifu University School of Medicine, Gifu 500-8705 [Y. S., S. S.]; Department of Surgery, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Yamaguchi 755-8505 [S. H., M. O.]; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033 [Y. O.]; Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Cancer Institute, Tokyo 170-8455 [S. T.]; and Japan Society for Cancer Chemotherapy, Osaka 550-0002 [T. Ta.], Japan
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, tumor necrosis
factor-
, IL-6, IL-10, and neopterin. In two patients with renal cell
carcinoma, complete response and partial response of metastatic tumors
were observed with 50 and 300 ng/kg; the responses lasted for 5 and 3.5
months, respectively. Although immunological response to rhIL-12 varies
depending on administration route and schedule and on patients
physiological conditions, the recommended dose for Phase II studies is
300 ng/kg s.c. three times a week for 2 weeks followed by 1-week rest. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
;
is produced by monocytes, B cells, and other antigen-presenting cells;
enhances the growth and cytotoxicity of T and natural killer
cells; and is known to accelerate the differentiation of naive T cells
(Th0) to Th1 cells and to suppress the differentiation of Th0 cells to
Th2 cells (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16)
.
IL-12 has in vivo antitumor activity against a number of
murine tumors. Of note, irrespective of whether tumors were at early or
late stages of growth, i.p. injections of recombinant IL-12
induced complete tumor regression of s.c. tumors. Furthermore, the
IL-12-treated mice exhibited resistance to the rechallenge of the same
tumor but not to a second syngeneic tumor. After the IL-12
treatment, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells infiltrated into the tumors, and the
prior administration of anti-IFN-
monoclonal antibody completely
abrogated the antitumor effect. Additionally, IL-12 inhibited the
metastases of highly aggressive murine tumors in lungs and lymph nodes
(17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23)
. IL-12 also inhibited angiogenesis and basic
fibroblast growth factor-induced corneal neovascularization
(24)
. IL-12 augments cytolytic activity of peripheral
blood mononuclear cells from patients with solid tumors and from
patients undergoing allogeneic bone marrow transplantation
(25, 26, 27, 28)
.
These findings suggest that IL-12 may have potent antitumor activities in humans, and Phase I clinical studies of two rhIL-12 products have been conducted by i.v. or s.c. administrations in patients with advanced tumors (29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35) . The incidence and degree of adverse reactions depended highly on the dosing protocol of the drug, and some objective tumor responses were observed in patients with renal cell carcinoma or melanoma (31, 32, 33 , 35) and with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (34) .
In an animal tumor study in Japan, a stronger antitumor effect of IL-12 was observed by three-times-a-week administration than by a once-a-week schedule (21) . Therefore, we conducted a dose-escalation study of rhIL-12 injected s.c. three times a week for 2 weeks followed by 1-week rest, repeating this course for at least two more courses.
| PATIENTS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3,000/µl, hemoglobin
9.5 g/dl, and platelet count
100,000/µl; adequate hepatic function defined as bilirubin
1.5
mg/dl, and aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase
2 times the normal upper limit; and adequate renal function defined
as creatinine equal to 2 mg/dl. Exclusion criteria included the
following: history of allergic reactions to biological products;
positive skin reaction to a test dose of rIL-12; uncontrolled
infection; uncontrolled diabetes mellitus; overt autoimmune disease;
seropositivity to hepatitis C virus or hepatitis B surface antigen;
concomitant use of corticosteroids; and history of interstitial
pneumonia, pulmonary fibrosis, peripheral neuropathy or other central
nervous system disease and/or inflammatory disease of the colon.
Pregnant women, nursing mothers, and patients with lymphoid malignancy
were also ineligible. Patients who had received antitumor drugs within
the preceding 4 weeks or who had ever received any other
investigational drugs were also ineligible.
Study Design.
The study was an open-label, nonrandomized, multicenter Phase I
dose-escalation study. The protocol was approved by each institutional
review board, and all of the patients gave written informed consent.
The study was conducted in accordance with the new Good Clinical
Practice guideline from the International Conference for
Harmonization. rhIL-12 (Yamanouchi Pharmaceutical Co. LTD.,
Tokyo, and Genetics Institute, Inc, Cambridge, MA) was s.c. injected
three times a week for 2 weeks followed by 1-week rest. At least three
courses of treatment were repeatedly given every 3 weeks, and tumor
response was evaluated at the end of each course.
At least three patients were enrolled at each dose level of 50, 100, 200, and 300 ng/kg. Intrapatient dose escalation was not allowed during the first two courses but was permitted after the third course.
Toxicity was assessed using the National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria with slight modification. A grade 3 or greater toxicity was regarded as DLT. Grade 4 neutropenia and grade 4 lymphopenia were not regarded as DLTs when they decreased to grade 3 or less within a week after the withdrawal of rhIL-12. If any patient developed a DLT at a particular dose level, then an additional three patients were enrolled at that dose level. Dose escalation was halted when 2 patients at a particular dose level experienced any DLT, and the dose level was designated as the maximum tolerated dose.
Pharmacokinetics.
Serial blood samples were collected before and 3, 6, 8, 10, 24, and
48 h after the first injection of the first course and after the
sixth injection of the second course. rhIL-12 in the serum and urine
was analyzed by ELISA with lowest detection limits of 2 pg/ml and 20
pg/ml, respectively.
Immunobiology.
Plasma for IFN-
, TNF-
, IL-6, and IL-10 and sera for neopterin
concentrations were collected before and 24 h after the first and
the sixth injections of rhIL-12 of each course. Four cytokines were
measured by ELISA using murine monoclonal antibodies of commercially
available ELISA kits: BMS228 for human IFN-
(Bender MedSystems,
Vienna, Austria), Quantikine HSTA50 for human TNF-
(R&D Systems,
Minneapolis, MN), Quantikine HS600 for human IL-6 (R&DS;), and Human
IL-10 US KHC0103 for human IL-10 (BioSource International, Inc.,
Camarillo, CA). Neopterin was assayed according to the method
reported by Hausen et al. (37)
. Sera for anti-rhlL-12 antibody and anti-Chinese hamster ovary protein
antibody were also obtained before the start of therapy and 3 weeks
after the end of the final course. These antibodies were measured by
ELISA.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Toxicity.
A common adverse event was fever of up to grade 2, which was noted in
12 patients including all of the 9 patients receiving 200 ng/kg or
more (Table 2)
. Fever resolved
without treatment or with treatment by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs and did not prevent the continuation of rhIL-12. Less common
adverse events included pain, redness and itching at the injection
sites, chest discomfort, anxiety/nervousness, headache, stomatitis, and
tachycardia, each of which was noted only in one patient. No dry skin,
hypotension, or eosinophilia was reported.
|
Estimation of MAD.
Grade 3 elevation of aminotransferases was observed in two of six
patients in the 300 ng/kg group. In one of the two patients (Fig. 1
,
), the aminotransferase levels
started to rise on day 5 in the first course and reached grade 3 on day
8, and, despite the continuation of the drug, the levels came down
until day 12 (the final administration day in the first course) and
returned to the normal levels on day 19; in the second course, however,
only grade 1 elevation of aminotransferases was observed. In the other
of the two patients (Fig. 1
, ), grade 3 elevation of
aminotransferases was noted in the third course. The levels were normal
before the third course but were elevated to grade 3 on day 19 of this
course and returned to the normal level on day 26. The serum
concentrations of IL-12 in this patient were not different between the
first and second courses, although we did not measure the
concentration after the third course. Of six patients in the 300 ng/kg
group, two each received two, three, and five courses, respectively.
|
300 ng/kg rhIL-12 from the same manufacturer given
s.c. twice daily was associated with regression of cutaneous T-cell
lymphoma in a Phase I study (34)
and 500 ng/kg
administered i.v. for 5 days was associated with serious adverse events
in a Phase II study (29
, 31)
, we estimated the MAD for
Japanese patients to be 300 ng/kg, and no further dose escalation was
done.
Pharmacokinetics.
A pharmacokinetic study was performed in nine patients who received 200
or 300 ng/kg (Table 3)
because the
detection limit of rhIL-12 was apparently not high enough to study the
smaller-dose schedules. After the first s.c. injection, the serum
rhIL-12 levels reached the maximum values
(Cmax) at 7.824 h later and then
slowly decreased until 48 h, at which time rhIL-12 was still
detectable (Fig. 2)
. Although there was a
considerable variation among patients, no clear dose dependency was
found either in Cmax or in the AUC
from 0 to 48 h (AUC048 h) between
the 200- and 300-ng/kg groups. There was almost no difference in
Cmax after the first injection of 300
ng/kg in the first course and after the sixth injection in the second
course (mean, 61.4 and 56.5 pg/ml, respectively). Mean serum half-life
of rhIL-12 was 24.8 h after the first injection of 300 ng/kg in
the first course and was prolonged to 62.4 h after the sixth
injection in the second course. However, there was almost no difference
between the AUC048 h after the first
injection of 300 ng/kg in the first course and the
AUC048 h after the sixth injection in
the second course (mean, 1669.5 and 1993.6 pg·hr/ml, respectively).
|
|
Biological Parameters.
Plasma or serum concentrations of IFN-
, TNF-
, IL-6, IL-10, and
neopterin after the s.c. injections of 50, 100, 200, and 300 ng/kg
rhIL-12 are shown in Table 4
. There were
great variations among patients irrespective of the dose. As shown in
Fig. 3
, plasma IFN-
concentrations
were highest after the first dose and tended to decrease after the
subsequent doses. The peak levels after the first injection at each
dose level were not clearly in dose-dependent, but at 300 ng/kg,
the peak levels after the subsequent doses tended to be higher
than those of lower doses. IFN-
levels of the two patients who
showed antitumor responses to rhIL-12 were not higher than those of
nonresponders at the same dose level. Plasma TNF-
was detectable at
all of the dose levels (Table 4
and Fig. 4
). The concentrations tended to be
higher in the 300 ng/kg group but again were not clearly
dose-dependent. More than 10 pg/ml TNF-
were seen in only three
patients, two of whom showed antitumor responses to rhIL-12. Plasma
IL-6 and IL-10 and serum neopterin concentrations showed the similar
patterns. There was no clear dose dependency, but the concentrations
tended to be higher in the 300-ng/kg group. The pretreatment
level of IL-10 was very high in one of three patients in the 50 ng/kg
group (191.0, 1.8, and 3.5 pg/ml, respectively). This patient had
extensive metastatic colon cancer including in the liver and pelvis,
showed progressive disease despite two cycles of IL-12 treatment, and
died 3 months later. IL-6, IL-10, and neopterin levels of the two
patients who showed antitumor responses were not higher than those of
nonresponders at the same dose level. No anti-rhlL-12 nor anti-Chinese
hamster ovary protein antibodies were detected in sera obtained
3 weeks after the end of the final course in any of the patients.
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, TNF, IL-6, IL-10, and neopterin after s.c. injections of
IL-12. For this rhIL-12 product, the first Phase I dose-escalation
study was conducted in the United States by a single-test dose followed
14 days later by cycles of five consecutive daily i.v. administration
every 3 weeks, establishing a maximum tolerated dose of 500 ng/kg
(30)
. The subsequent Phase II study with 500 ng/kg by five
consecutive daily i.v. administration, however, resulted in unexpected
serious adverse events (29
, 31)
. Some patients could not
tolerate more than two successive doses, and 2 of 17 patients died.
Thorough investigations including animal studies revealed that a single
injection of rhIL-12 2 weeks before a consecutive dosing has a profound
abrogating effect on the IL-12-induced IFN-
production and toxicity
(31)
. Recently, Rakhit et al. (38)
reported that the down-regulation of serum IFN-
levels correlated
with decreased mRNA expression in mice. This unique biological effect
necessitated the careful evaluation of the administration
schedule for the safe clinical development of this highly promising
cytokine. In Japan, we had already started this dose-escalation study by s.c. administration before the above unexpected toxicities were observed by i.v. administration in the Phase II study in the United States. We believed that it would be better to administer most cytokines by s.c. injection, which would give lower but more sustained plasma concentrations of cytokines than would i.v. administration. We also thought that, unlike cytotoxic antitumor drugs, for cytokines to exert their biological effects, maximum tolerable doses would not be needed, but sustained biologically active plasma concentrations would be required.
Subcutaneously-injected rhIL-12 was well tolerated up to 300 ng/kg given three times a week for 2 weeks followed by 1-week rest as one course. Grade 3 elevation of aminotransferases was observed in two of six patients receiving 300 ng/kg. The grade 3 elevation was noted after the first course in one patient and after the third course in the other, and thus only one of six experienced the grade 3 elevation in the first course. The elevation of these hepatic enzymes was transient, showing the highest peak 24 h after the initial dosing and decreasing before the start of the next dosing. The peak levels generally became lower despite the continuation of rhIL-12. Even at the 50-ng/kg dose level, one patient with metastatic renal carcinoma showed a complete tumor response. Another patient with metastatic renal carcinoma showed a good partial response at the 300-ng/kg dose level. Therefore, we estimated 300 ng/kg s.c. given three times a week for 2 weeks to be the MAD, and no further dose escalation was attempted. Rook et al. (34) also reported tumor regression in five of nine patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma by s.c. injection of either 50, 100, or 300 ng/kg twice weekly in their Phase I dose escalation study with the same IL-12 product. Thus, 300 ng/kg of rhIL-12 given s.c. three times a week seems to be a clinically relevant dose for Phase II studies of this rhIL-12 product. Using other rhIL-12 products, Bajetta et al. (32) , Motzer et al. (33) , and Portielje et al. (35) also observed antitumor effects in patients with metastatic melanoma or advanced renal cell carcinoma by using up to 1.5 µg/kg given s.c. weekly for three weeks as one course.
Common adverse effects other than elevated hepatic enzymes included
fever, leukopenia, and elevations of C-reactive protein and
ß2-microglobulin. These effects were also transient and moderate in
severity. Only one patient experienced mild stomatitis. Atkins et
al. regarded stomatitis as well as elevation of hepatic enzymes as
DLTs at the 500-ng/kg dose level (30)
. The discrepancy may
be explained by the fact that the blood levels of IFN-
in the
300-ng/kg group in our s.c.-injected patients were only one-tenth of
the blood levels of their i.v.-administered patients at the 250-ng/kg
dose level. Motzer et al. and Portielje et al.
reported that the DLT of their rhIL-12 product given s.c. was the
elevation of aminotransferases, while observing a few occurrences of
grades 1 and 2 mucositis (33
, 35)
.
Unlike in the case of i.v. administration, the pharmacokinetic study
revealed no spiking high plasma levels of rhIL-12 by s.c. schedules as
seen in this study and other Phase I studies with different rhIL-12
products (32
, 33
, 35)
. After the i.v. administration of
250 ng/kg in the Phase I study with the same IL-12 product as the
present study, the mean Cmax was 6,440
pg/ml, the mean plasma half life was 7.2 h, and the mean
AUC0-
was 64,276 pg·h/ml
(30)
. In contrast, in our s.c. injection of 300 ng/kg, the
mean Cmax was only 61 pg/ml, but the
mean plasma half life was 25 h with detectable rhIL-12 even at
48 h, and the mean AUC0
was 2,346
pg·h/ml. Thus, the s.c. dosing gave a lower peak and less AUC but
more sustained plasma levels than the i.v. dosing. Of note, the plasma
concentrations after the sixth dosing in the second course were similar
to those after the first dosing in the first course.
As reported, rhIL-12 was a potent inducer of IFN-
. Although
there was a great variation among patients, the plasma levels of
IFN-
tended to be higher after the first injection in the first
course, become lower with subsequent administrations, and again showed
high peaks after the initial dosing of each course after the 1-week
rest period. The peak levels were apparently less than those obtained
in the i.v. administration. TNF-
, IL-6, IL-10, and neopterin were
also induced in similar patterns. However, these data should be
interpreted carefully for the following reasons: the number of patients
in each group was small; there are great variations in clinical
conditions and disease stages among patients; the ELISA assay measures
not functional but total cytokine levels; and the stability of
functional cytokines in stored serum is unknown.
Regarding the antitumor effect, a complete response and a partial response of metastatic tumors were observed in two of eight patients with renal cell carcinoma at 50-ng/kg and 300-ng/kg doses, respectively. This observation confirmed that rhIL-12 had a definite antitumor effect on human cancer as reported previously (31, 32, 33, 34, 35) and warrants additional clinical studies.
Our present study and other previous studies have shown that in vivo immunological response to rhIL-12 vary considerably, depending on the administration routes and schedules, and probably on physiological conditions of patients. Therefore, several regimens with different dosages and schedules should be investigated further. As far as the administration schedule used in this study is concerned, the recommended dose level for Phase II studies is 300 ng/kg.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, at Department of Medicine III, Hamamatsu University School
of Medicine, 3600 Handacho, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Japan. Phone:
81-53-435-2265; Fax: 81-53-434-2910. E-mail: ohnoryu{at}hama-med.ac.jp ![]()
2 The abbreviations used are: IL,
interleukin; rhIL-12, recombinant human IL-12; DLT, dose-limiting
toxicity; MAD, maximum acceptable dose; TNF, tumor necrosis factor;
LDH, lactic dehydrogenase, AUC, area under the
curve. ![]()
Received 2/23/00; revised 4/ 6/00; accepted 4/ 7/00.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ß+, TCR-
+ T lymphocytes, and NK cells. J. Immunol., 149: 3495-3502, 1992.[Abstract]
induction by natural killer cell stimulatory factor (NKSF/IL-12): Role of transcription and mRNA stability in the synergistic interaction between NKSF and IL-2. J. Immunol., 148: 92-98, 1992.[Abstract]
-inducing in enhanced production of IFN-
. J. Immunol., 159: 2125-2131, 1997.
production. J. Immunol., 153: 1697-1709, 1994.[Abstract]
production by anti-tumor T cells. Int. Immunol., 7: 1135-1145, 1995.
in the mediation of interleukin 12-induced tumor regression. Cancer Res., 58: 2426-2432, 1998.
production. Blood, 90: 2541-2548, 1997.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Trudeau, M. M. Cotreau, L. Stonis, K. H. Dykstra, J. L. Oestreicher, A. Strahs, A. J. Dorner, V. H. Van Cleave, W. L. Trepicchio, and U. S. Schwertschlag A Single Administration of Recombinant Human Interleukin-12 Is Associated With Increased Expression Levels of Interferon-gamma and Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription in Healthy Subjects J. Clin. Pharmacol., June 1, 2005; 45(6): 649 - 658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. A. Portielje, C. H. J. Lamers, W. H. J. Kruit, A. Sparreboom, R. L. H. Bolhuis, G. Stoter, C. Huber, and J. W. Gratama Repeated Administrations of Interleukin (IL)-12 Are Associated with Persistently Elevated Plasma Levels of IL-10 and Declining IFN-{gamma}, Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha}, IL-6, and IL-8 Responses Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2003; 9(1): 76 - 83. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Ansell, T. E. Witzig, P. J. Kurtin, J. A. Sloan, D. F. Jelinek, K. G. Howell, S. N. Markovic, T. M. Habermann, G. G. Klee, P. J. Atherton, et al. Phase 1 study of interleukin-12 in combination with rituximab in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma Blood, January 1, 2002; 99(1): 67 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |