
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates |
Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160, Japan
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1, IL-6
7 pg/ml, PS
1, PSA >100
ng/ml, and ALP >620 IU/liter were associated with a significantly
lower survival rate than their respective counterparts. In multivariate
analysis, however, the only two significant prognostic factors were EOD
and IL-6. In 51 patients with stage C and stage D prostate cancer,
univariate analysis showed that EOD
1, IL-6
7 pg/ml, PS
1,
PSA >100 ng/ml, LDH >200 IU/liter, and ALP >620 IU/liter were
significantly related to survival, whereas multivariate analysis again
demonstrated that EOD
1 and IL-6
7 pg/ml were significant
prognostic factors. These results indicate that the serum IL-6 level is
a significant prognostic factor for prostate cancer as well as EOD. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Serum levels of PSA were assayed by E-Test Tosoh II PA. Serum ALP was measured using 4-nitrophenyl-phosphate as a substrate, and serum LDH was measured using L-lactate as a substrate. Blood for the measurement of serum IL-6 was collected into nonheparinized tubes, and serum was separated within 1 h of blood collection. The serum was stored at -80°C and then thawed just prior to testing. IL-6 determination was performed according to the manufacturers instructions using an R&D Systems Quantikine enzyme-linked immunoadsorbent assay kit. The interval between the measurement of the serum IL-6 level and the initiation of treatment was 090 days (median, 23 days).
Seven of 23 patients with stage B disease were initially treated with radiation therapy or radical prostatectomy, and the remaining 16 patients were treated with endocrine therapy, using castration (medical castration using a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue or surgical castration) with or without antiandrogens. All of the patients with stage C and stage D disease were treated using immediate endocrine therapy. No local treatment was performed for stage C patients. The median time of follow-up and the follow-up range were 41 months and 885 months, respectively.
The results are presented as mean values ± SE. The patients were
arbitrarily divided into groups according to tumor histology (well and
moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma versus poorly
differentiated adenocarcinoma), PS (PS = 0 versus PS
1), bone scan findings (EOD 0 versus EOD
1 or EOD
1
versus EOD
2), pretreatment serum PSA levels (<100 ng/ml
versus
100 ng/ml), pretreatment serum ALP levels [less
than or equal to twice the upper limit of normal (
620 IU/liter)
versus greater than twice the upper limit of normal (>620
IU/liter)], pretreatment serum LDH levels [less than or equal to the
upper limit of normal (
200 IU/liter) versus greater than
the upper limit of normal (>200 IU/liter)], pretreatment serum IL-6
levels (<7 pg/ml versus
7 pg/ml), and pretreatment Hb
levels (Hb >12 g/dl versus Hb
12 g/dl).
Variables of two different groups were compared using Students t test. The influence of tumor histology, PS, bone metastasis, serum PSA, serum ALP, serum LDH, serum IL-6, and Hb on disease-specific survival was assessed. Survival curves were constructed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Coxs proportional hazards model was used for univariate and multivariate analyses of survival. To obtain a multivariate model with the maximum precision of the important variables, a stepwise selection procedure was used. In all analyses, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The patients were arbitrarily divided into two groups according to the
serum IL-6 level (
7 pg/ml versus <7 pg/ml). The former
group was 72.67 ± 2.60 years old, and the latter group was
73.63 ± 0.96 years old, and the two groups were similar with
respect to age (P = 0.727). The serum PSA, LDH, and ALP
levels in the patients with serum IL-6 levels
7 pg/ml were
1059.88 ± 587.13 ng/ml, 234.88 ± 59.92 IU/liter, and
790.40 ± 278.80 IU/liter, respectively, which were significantly
higher than those in patients with serum IL-6 levels <7 pg/ml
(260.27 ± 90.86 ng/ml, 167.79 ± 5.44 IU/liter, and
324.47 ± 43.97 IU/liter, respectively; P <
0.05).
To identify the variables of potential prognostic significance in all
of the patients with prostate cancer, univariate analysis of each
variable was performed in relation to the survival time. The difference
in prognosis was assessed by examining the relative hazard and
P for each variable. This analysis demonstrated that
patients with EOD
1, IL-6
7 pg/ml, PS
1, PSA >100 ng/ml, and ALP
>620 IU/liter had a significantly lower survival rate than their
respective counterparts (P < 0.05; Table 1
). Tumor histology, LDH, and the Hb
value were not significantly correlated with the prognosis in this
univariate analysis. The relative importance of each variable was then
determined by multivariate Coxs proportional hazards model analysis.
Stepwise inclusion of variables in the model showed that the
significant prognostic factors were EOD and IL-6 (Table 1)
.
|
1, IL-6
7 pg/ml, PS
1, PSA >100 ng/ml,
ALP >620 IU/liter, and LDH >200 IU/liter were significantly related
to survival (Table 2)
1 and IL-6
7 pg/ml were significant
prognostic factors (Table 2)
|
2, IL-6
7 pg/ml, PSA >100 ng/ml, and ALP >620 IU/liter
were significantly related to survival (Fig. 1)
2 and
IL-6
7 pg/ml were significant prognostic factors (Table 3)
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Furthermore, it has been reported that serum levels of IL-6 are elevated in patients with malignant tumors, including patients with prostate cancer (5 , 9) . Patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (10) and patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (11 , 12) have higher serum IL-6 levels than those without disseminated disease. On the other hand, it has been reported that in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, serum IL-6 levels were not correlated with tumor stage (13) . In the present study, serum IL-6 levels were significantly higher in patients with stage D prostate cancer than in patients with stage B and stage C prostate cancer, supporting the previous report that patients with metastatic prostate cancer had significantly elevated serum IL-6 levels compared with other prostate cancer patients (5) .
It has been reported that elevated serum IL-6 levels are
associated with a poor prognosis in patients with metastatic renal cell
carcinoma (11)
, in patients with non-small cell lung
cancer (10)
, and in patients with ovarian cancer
(14)
. In addition, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
patients with serum IL-6 levels
7 pg/ml had a significantly lower
survival rate than those with serum levels <7 pg/ml (15)
.
On the other hand, in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, serum
IL-6 levels were not correlated statistically with overall survival
(13)
. Therefore, the prognostic significance of IL-6
remains to be fully elucidated in patients with malignancy. To our
knowledge, no previous study has investigated the prognostic
significance of this cytokine in patients with prostate cancer.
In the present study, univariate analysis demonstrated that EOD, IL-6, PSA, and ALP were associated with a poor prognosis in stage D prostate cancer patients. It was reported that in univariate analysis, ALP, ESR, and EOD were significantly related to prostate cancer death in patients with bone metastases (16) . Matzkin et al. (17) have reported that in a univariate analysis PS, EOD, Hb, ALP, and PSA were all significant prognostic factors in patients with metastatic prostate cancer, whereas multivariate analyses showed that only ALP and Hb were significant prognostic variables. On the other hand, it has been reported that multivariate analyses showed ALP and PS to be significant prognostic factors in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (18) , whereas Hb was not shown to be a significant prognostic factor (18 , 19) . In the present study, multivariate analyses showed that PS, ALP, PSA, and Hb were all insignificant as prognostic variables. This may be partly because these variables probably reflect the metastatic burden and interact with EOD and partly because most patients with prostate cancer now begin therapy before a decrease in PS, as suggested previously (20) , and probably a decrease in Hb. Johansson et al. (19) have reported that metastasis, tumor stage, and ESR are significantly related to survival on multivariate analysis in patients with advanced prostate cancer. However, the clinical relevance of ESR is unclear (19) , and they have no clear hypothesis on what aspect of tumor behavior the ESR reflects (19) .
It is interesting to note that IL-6 induces the synthesis and secretion
of acute-phase proteins such as fibrinogen and C-reactive protein
by hepatocytes (21)
as well as indirectly increasing the
2-globulin levels, resulting in an increase of the ESR. In addition,
serum IL-6 levels have been reported to show a significant correlation
with ESR (12)
. In the present study, the variables with a
significant influence on survival in patients with advanced prostate
cancer according to multivariate analysis were EOD and serum IL-6,
which may explain the previous report that ESR is an indicator of death
in patients with advanced prostatic cancer (22)
.
These results indicate that the serum IL-6 level may be associated with the prognosis of patients with prostate cancer, suggesting that IL-6 and EOD are both prognostic factors that can be used to identify patients with a poor prognosis who may benefit from more aggressive management.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported in part by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
Research from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, Japan. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, at Department of Urology, Keio University School of
Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160, Japan. Phone:
81-3-3353-1211; Fax: 81-3-3225-1985. ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: IL-6, interleukin 6;
ALP, alkaline phosphatase; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; PS, performance
status; EOD, extent of disease; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; Hb,
hemoglobin; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate. ![]()
Received 11/15/99; revised 3/19/00; accepted 3/21/00.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. F. Shariat, J. A. Karam, J. Walz, C. G. Roehrborn, F. Montorsi, V. Margulis, F. Saad, K. M. Slawin, and P. I. Karakiewicz Improved Prediction of Disease Relapse after Radical Prostatectomy through a Panel of Preoperative Blood-Based Biomarkers Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 14(12): 3785 - 3791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Porta, M. De Amici, S. Quaglini, C. Paglino, F. Tagliani, A. Boncimino, R. Moratti, and G. R. Corazza Circulating interleukin-6 as a tumor marker for hepatocellular carcinoma Ann. Onc., February 1, 2008; 19(2): 353 - 358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-C. Liao, J.-T. Lin, C.-Y. Wu, S.-P. Huang, M.-T. Lin, A. S.-H. Wu, Y.-J. Huang, and M.-S. Wu Serum Interleukin-6 Level but not Genotype Predicts Survival after Resection in Stages II and III Gastric Carcinoma Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2008; 14(2): 428 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Flynn, B. K. McFarlin, and M. M. Markofski State of the Art Reviews: The Anti-Inflammatory Actions of Exercise Training American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, May 1, 2007; 1(3): 220 - 235. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Nettikadan, K. Radke, J. Johnson, J. Xu, M. Lynch, C. Mosher, and E. Henderson Detection and Quantification of Protein Biomarkers from Fewer than 10 Cells Mol. Cell. Proteomics, May 1, 2006; 5(5): 895 - 901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. George, S. Halabi, T. F. Shepard, B. Sanford, N. J. Vogelzang, E. J. Small, and P. W. Kantoff The Prognostic Significance of Plasma Interleukin-6 Levels in Patients with Metastatic Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer: Results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9480 Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2005; 11(5): 1815 - 1820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Jia, C. S-Y. Choong, C. Ricciardelli, J. Kim, W. D. Tilley, and G. A Coetzee Androgen Receptor Signaling: Mechanism of Interleukin-6 Inhibition Cancer Res., April 1, 2004; 64(7): 2619 - 2626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Yang, J. Addai, W.-h. Tian, A. Frolov, T. M. Wheeler, and T. C. Thompson Reduced Infiltration of Class A Scavenger Receptor Positive Antigen-Presenting Cells Is Associated with Prostate Cancer Progression Cancer Res., March 15, 2004; 64(6): 2076 - 2082. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Kim, R. M. Adam, K. R. Solomon, and M. R. Freeman Involvement of Cholesterol-Rich Lipid Rafts in Interleukin-6-Induced Neuroendocrine Differentiation of LNCaP Prostate Cancer Cells Endocrinology, February 1, 2004; 145(2): 613 - 619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Trikha, R. Corringham, B. Klein, and J.-F. Rossi Targeted Anti-Interleukin-6 Monoclonal Antibody Therapy for Cancer: A Review of the Rationale and Clinical Evidence Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2003; 9(13): 4653 - 4665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. Kattan, S. F. Shariat, B. Andrews, K. Zhu, E. Canto, K. Matsumoto, M. Muramoto, P. T. Scardino, M. Ohori, T. M. Wheeler, et al. The Addition of Interleukin-6 Soluble Receptor and Transforming Growth Factor Beta1 Improves a Preoperative Nomogram for Predicting Biochemical Progression in Patients With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2003; 21(19): 3573 - 3579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Kikuchi, Y. Horiguchi, J. Nakashima, K. Kuroda, M. Oya, T. Ohigashi, N. Takahashi, Y. Shima, K. Umezawa, and M. Murai Suppression of Hormone-refractory Prostate Cancer by a Novel Nuclear Factor {kappa}B Inhibitor in Nude Mice Cancer Res., January 1, 2003; 63(1): 107 - 110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Smaletz, H. I. Scher, E. J. Small, D. A. Verbel, A. McMillan, K. Regan, W. K. Kelly, and M. W. Kattan Nomogram for Overall Survival of Patients With Progressive Metastatic Prostate Cancer After Castration J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2002; 20(19): 3972 - 3982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Giri, M. Ozen, and M. Ittmann Interleukin-6 Is an Autocrine Growth Factor in Human Prostate Cancer Am. J. Pathol., December 1, 2001; 159(6): 2159 - 2165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hobisch, R. Ramoner, D. Fuchs, S. Godoy-Tundidor, G. Bartsch, H. Klocker, and Z. Culig Prostate Cancer Cells (LNCaP) Generated after Long-Term Interleukin 6 (IL-6) Treatment Express IL-6 and Acquire an IL-6 Partially Resistant Phenotype Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2001; 7(9): 2941 - 2948. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.-L. Lin, M. C. Whitney, Z. Yao, and E. T. Keller Interleukin-6 Induces Androgen Responsiveness in Prostate Cancer Cells through Up-Regulation of Androgen Receptor Expression Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2001; 7(6): 1773 - 1781. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |