Clinical Cancer Research The Science of Cancer Health Disparities
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bottini, A.
Right arrow Articles by Dogliotti, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bottini, A.
Right arrow Articles by Dogliotti, L.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 6, 2751-2758, July 2000
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research


Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates

p53 but not bcl-2 Immunostaining Is Predictive of Poor Clinical Complete Response to Primary Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients1

Alberto Bottini, Alfredo Berruti, Alessandra Bersiga, Maria Pia Brizzi, Antonio Brunelli, Gabriella Gorzegno, Bianca DiMarco, Sergio Aguggini, Giovanna Bolsi, Fernando Cirillo, Luciano Filippini, Enrico Betri, Giovanni Bertoli, Palmiro Alquati and Luigi Dogliotti2

Centro di Senologia [A. Bo., A. Br., S. A., F. C., L. F., P. A.] and Anatomia Patologica Azienda Ospedaliera Istituti Ospitalieri, Cremona, Italy [A. Bers., B. D., G. Bo., E. B., G. Be.], and Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche e Biologiche, Università di Torino, Oncologia Medica, Azienda Ospedaliera San Luigi, 10043 Orbassano, Italy [A. Berr., M. P. B., G. G., L. D.]


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Preoperative chemotherapy administered to breast cancer (BC) patients is a model for studying in vivo the interaction between cytotoxic treatment and clinical and biological parameters. Apoptosis induced by anticancer agents is a mechanism of treatment activity; therefore, overexpression of genes inhibiting the apoptotic pathway could produce drug resistant tumors. In the present study, the two most studied inhibitors of apoptosis, the bcl-2 gene and the mutant p53, have been evaluated to assess whether they may play a role in modulating response of BC to primary chemotherapy. From August 1990 to January 1997, 143 patients bearing T2–4N0–1M0 primary BC were submitted to two different chemotherapeutic regimens before surgery. The first 64 received the cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5fluorouracil (CMF) regimen (on days 1 and 8 and every 28 days thereafter) associated with tamoxifen (30 mg daily) in case of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive BC, and the remaining 79 were submitted to single agent epirubicin (120 mg/m2 every 21 days). The expression of p53, bcl-2, Ki67, ER, progesterone receptor, c-erbB2, and the multidrug resistance P-glycoprotein (gp-170) was evaluated in BC specimens obtained at diagnosis by incision biopsy and at postchemotherapy surgery. At the end of chemotherapy administration (median, 3 cycles; range, 2–6), the clinical complete response (cCR) rate was superimposable in the patient subgroups with bcl-2-positive or -negative primary tumors; conversely, p53 expression, at a cutoff of 10% positive cells, was significantly associated with a lower cCR rate (9.4 versus 27.0%; P < 0.04). p53 was a significant predictor for poor cCR in the subset submitted to epirubicin (3.6 versus 25.5%; P < 0.02; in patients with p53+ and p53– BC, respectively); by contrast, only a trend toward lower cCR has been observed in patients with p53+ tumors receiving CMF ± tamoxifen with respect to p53– ones. The distribution of cCR according to the gp-170-positive or -negative tumors was 8 versus 22% in patients submitted to epirubicin and 29 versus 30% in those receiving CMF ± tamoxifen, respectively. In a multivariate regression analysis, after adjusting for treatment administered (epirubicin versus CMF ± tamoxifen), menopausal status, tumor and node status, histology grade, ER, progesterone receptor, c-erbB2, Ki67, bcl-2, and gp-170 expression, the p53 status maintained an independent predictive role for cCR. Most of the tumors undergoing change in percentage of p53 expression after both treatments originally harbored mutant protein, and only four BC specimens that were p53 negative before chemotherapy became positive afterward. These data confirm in vivo the concept that the responsiveness of tumors to chemotherapy in part derives from the capability of BC cells to undergo apoptosis. The role of mutated p53 in preventing response is more evident in patients submitted to epirubicin, and this may be caused by the up-regulation of multidrug resistance gene expression by p53 inactivation. p53 is a stable phenotype and is not inducible by at least three or four chemotherapy cycles.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
A major impediment to successful cytotoxic therapy is the failure of a number of tumors to respond to treatment and the appearance of resistant cell population upon relapse of an originally responsive malignancy. Consequently, the underlying basis of cellular resistance to anticancer agents has been the focus of many experimental studies.

The tumor-specific action of most anticancer agents has been attributed for decades to their debilitating effects on actively proliferating cells (1) . In recent years, an increasing body of evidence suggests that anticancer agents can induce apoptosis in a manner indistinguishable from that caused in eukaryotic cells by DNA damage and/or depriving cells of growth factors (2 , 3) .

Programmed cell death is an active process and depends on the expression of a specific set of genes (4) . Among them, wild-type p53 can induce apoptosis (5 , 6) , deregulated c-myc can enhance apoptosis in particular conditions (7) , and bcl-2 can inhibit apoptosis (8, 9, 10) .

Because apoptosis requires a genetic program, mutations in apoptotic pathways could produce drug resistant tumors.

In vitro studies have clearly shown that p53 is required for the efficient activation of apoptosis after irradiation or treatment with chemotherapeutic compounds (3 , 11) .

Loss of p53 function has been reported to enhance cellular resistance to chemotherapeutic agents in certain experimental tumor models (2) , as well as in in vivo studies (12) .

Mutation in the p53 tumor suppressor gene frequently occur in a variety of carcinomas, such as lung cancer (13) , colon cancer (14) , and BC3 (15) , that are scarcely or moderately responsive to the cytotoxic treatment. Conversely, it does not occur, or rarely occurs, in neoplasms that are highly responsive to chemotherapy, such as leukemia (5) , lymphomas (16) , and testis cancer (17) . Although wild-type p53 protein has a short half-life, many mutations stabilize the protein, thus making it amenable to detection by immunohistochemistry (18) .

The product of the bcl-2 gene has been shown to protect cells against death induced by a myriad of insults, including most chemotherapeutic drugs (19) . For this reason, it has been hypothesized that bcl-2 overexpression may play a role in the resistance to chemotherapy. High expression of the bcl-2 gene has been found to be associated with chemotherapy resistance in neuroblastoma (20) and acute myeloid leukemia (21) . Unexpectedly, bcl-2 expression in BC patients has been found to be related with a good prognosis (22, 23, 24) and with a better clinical response to tamoxifen (25) .

The administration of PC to BC patients is an elegant model to assess in vivo the chemosensitivity of the tumor. It has been repeatedly demonstrated that PC is able to induce tumor shrinkage (26, 27, 28, 29, 30) in a high percentage of patients, and the occurrence of cCR, observed in about 20%–30% of cases, was found to be significantly associated with a better prognosis (28 , 30) .

In a series of women with operable or locally advanced BC, submitted in the same institution to PC with two different chemotherapeutic regimens, we analyzed in univariate and multivariate analysis the association of bcl-2 expression and p53 inactivation with the clinical complete tumor response.


    PATIENTS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Patients.
From August 1990 to January 1997, 157 consecutive patients presented at the Breast Cancer Unit of the Azienda Ospedaliera Istituti Ospitalieri (Cremona, Italy) with an operable breast tumor or locally advanced disease (T2–4N0–1M0). The patients had been enrolled in two consecutive Phase II studies aimed at evaluating the activity of the CMF regimen administered in association with tamoxifen in cases with ER-positive tumors and the activity of the single agent epirubicin. None of the patients had objective skin inflammation or edema. On first presentation, an incision biopsy was performed on each patient. Initial staging comprised clinical examination, bilateral mammography, echography, chest X-ray, liver echography or computed tomography scan, and bone scintigraphy. All patients gave informed consent to the diagnostic procedures and the proposed treatment.

Treatment.
Chemotherapy was started within 1 or 2 days of diagnosis. The first consecutive 76 patients received the CMF chemotherapy regimen, which was given on days 1 and 8 of each treatment cycle. The dose of cyclophosphamide and 5fluorouracil was 600 mg/m2 of body surface area, and the dose of methotrexate was 40 mg/m2. The next 81 patients received epirubicin 60 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2. Each of the three drugs of the CMF regimen was repeated every 28 days, whereas epirubicin was administered every 21 days. The first consecutive 45 patients, with ER+ BC at first biopsy, concomitantly received tamoxifen (30 mg daily, p.o.). Hormonal treatment was administered after obtaining the results of the receptor status, about 20 days from the first biopsy, and continued up until surgery. The size of primary tumor and the size of axillary lymph nodes, when appreciable, were carefully measured every cycle by palpation by the same clinician using a caliper. To avoid interference attributable to postbiopsy edema, tumor shrinkage was evaluated from the second course onwards. Response was assessed by clinical measurement of the changes in the product of the two largest diameters recorded at baseline and at the end of chemotherapy before surgery. According to the WHO criteria (31) , tumor progression was defined as an increase of at least 25%, stable disease as a tumor size increase less than 25% or reduction less than or equal to 50%, PR as tumor shrinkage greater than 50%, and complete response as the complete disappearance of all clinical signs of disease. Surgery was planned after full clinical reassessment. Quadrantectomy or modified radical mastectomy was performed when indicated in association with full axillary dissection. All patients subjected to quadrantectomy underwent irradiation of the residual breast (60 Gy delivered in 6 weeks).

Preparation of Samples and Assessment of Histopathological Grade and Immunohistochemistry.
The surgical resection specimens at diagnosis and at mastectomy or quadrantectomy were examined and cut up fresh. Appropriate tissue blocks were then taken and fixed in 2.5% phenol formalin before routine processing and embedding in paraffin wax. In each case, 3-µm sections were cut and stained with H&E for histological examination.

The degree of malignancy was determined according to the Elston and Ellis (32) grading system, dividing tumors into grade I (well differentiated), grade II (moderately differentiated), and grade III (poorly differentiated).

Immunohistochemistry was performed on paraffin-embedded tissues as follows: sections were cut at 4–6 µm and floated onto slides in a water bath. The sections were then dried at 37°C overnight; paraffin was removed in xylene. Slides were placed in a glass box filled with 10 mM citrate buffer, pH 6.0, and then processed in a microwave oven two times for 5 min each at 750 W. The section were let cool down in the box at room temperature for about 20 min and then rinsed in Tris-buffered saline.

The following primary antibodies were applied according to the manufacturers’ instructions: ER [mouse monoclonal 6F11 (Novocastra Laboratory, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom); dilution, 1:50; 1-h incubation at room temperature], PgR [mouse monoclonal 1A6 (Novocastra Laboratory); dilution, 1:20; 1-h incubation at room temperature], Ki67 [mouse monoclonal Mib-1 (Dakopatts, Glostrup, Denmark); dilution, 1:30; 1-h incubation at room temperature], p53 [mouse monoclonal D07 (Novocastra Laboratory); dilution, 1:100; 1-h incubation at room temperature], bcl-2 [mouse monoclonal 124 (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark); dilution, 1:40; overnight incubation at 4°C], c-erbB2 [mouse monoclonal CB11 (Novocastra Laboratory), overnight incubation at 4°C], and P-glycoprotein [monoclonal MDR/JSB-1 (Novocastra Laboratory); dilution, 1:100; overnight incubation at room temperature].

Biotinylated horse antimouse IgG at a 1:200 dilution and avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex at a 1:100 dilution were added in sequences (Vectastatin ABC kit; Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA). A chromogen substrate solution containing hydrogen peroxide (0.06%, v/v) and diamino-benzidine 4-HCl (0.05, v/v) was added to each specimen for 1–2 min.

Slides were then rinsed in distilled water between applications and finally, were counterstained, dehydrated, cleared, and mounted for examination by light microscope with coverslip.

Immunohistochemical Scoring.
All samples had a negative control slide (no primary antibody) of an adjacent section to assess the degree of nonspecific staining. Positive controls included breast carcinomas known to exhibit high levels of each markers.

All staining was scored by counting the number of positively stained cells and expressed as a percentage of the total tumor cells (at least 1000) counted across several representative fields of the section using a standard light microscope equipped with a 10 x 10 square graticule. Reproducibility of counting was assessed by a second investigator rescoring 10 slides.

The relative intensity of ER and PgR staining was assessed in a semiquantitative fashion as described previously by McCarty et al. (33) , incorporating both the intensity and distribution of specific staining. A value (HSCORE) was derived from the sum of the percentages of positive-stained epithelial cells multiplied by the weighted intensity of staining. Specimens were deemed receptor positive if the HSCORE was greater than 100 (34) . The immunohistochemical evaluation at mastectomy was performed by the same pathologists, who remained blinded as regard as the disease response and the score assessed at first biopsy.

Statistical Analysis.
The association of variables was evaluated by the {chi}2 test or the Fisher’s exact test if applicable. Ki67 staining was categorized into three classes as shown in Table 1Citation . Multivariate analysis to predict for the complete response was performed by logistic regression. The regression coefficients were estimated by maximum likelihood criteria and their significance was tested by Wald’s test. Statistical analysis was performed on an IBM-compatible personal computer using the SPSS software (35) .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Patient characteristics

 

    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
One hundred forty-three of the 157 patients (91.1%) had both p53 and bcl-2 assessed at first biopsy and were included in the present analysis; of them, 64 were submitted to CMF ± tamoxifen and 79 to epirubicin. For the remaining 14 patients (12 submitted to CMF and 2 to epirubicin), the blocks had been discarded previously or could not be located. Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1Citation .

Treatment Activity.
Patients received a median of three cycles (range, 2–6) of either CMF ± tamoxifen or epirubicin. At the end of the chemotherapy administration, 33 patients (23.1%) attained a cDR and 71 patients attained a clinical PR (49.7%), for an overall response rate (cCR + clinical PR) of 72.8%. Thirty-seven patients showed stable disease (25.9%), whereas only two progressed (1.4%). The cCR levels were higher in patients receiving CMF ± tamoxifen (29.7%) than in patients submitted to epirubicin (17.7%), although this difference was not statistically significant.

Overall response was similar dividing patients according to either bcl-2 or p53 status at various cutoff of positive cells (data not shown). The distribution of the cCR rates did not show any difference between bcl-2-positive and -negative tumors, whereas p53 expression was negatively associated with the cCR at the cutoff of 10% positive cells (Table 2)Citation . CCR was also obtained in 7 of 42 (16.7%) and in 26 of 99 (26.3%) gp-170-positive and -negative BC (P not significant).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2 Distribution of responses according to the p53 and bcl-2 status (at various cutoffs of positive cells)

 
The predictive role of p53 status for cCR was also evaluated dividing patients according to the treatment administered. In the subgroup receiving epirubicin alone, the cCR was more frequently observed in patients bearing p53-negative tumors than in those with p53-positive BC; conversely, only a trend of greater cCR rate in favor of p53-negative tumors (at a cutoff of 10% positive cells) has been observed in patients submitted to CMF (Fig. 1)Citation .



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. cCR according to p53 status and treatment administered.

 
Two of 25 (8.0%) gp-170-positive and 12 of 53 (22.6%) gp-170-negative BC, submitted to epirubicin, attained a cCR (P not significant.), whereas the corresponding distribution of cCR in the CMF (± tamoxifen) subset was 5 of 17 (29.4%) and 14 of 46 (30.4%), respectively. CCR was obtained in none of the 10 patients with positive tumors for both p53 and gp-170 submitted to epirubicin, whereas it was obtained in 2 of 9 gp-170+/p53+ BC patients who received CMF + tamoxifen.

Effect of Chemotherapy on p53 and bcl-2 Immunostaining.
The percentages of cells positive for either p53 or bcl-2 on tumor specimens obtained at first biopsy and at mastectomy have been assessed, and a comparison has been performed. An increase >10% in p53 expression in tumor specimens from matched pairs of untreated and treated biopsies has been observed in 19 patients (13.3%), whereas >10% decrease of positive p53 cells has been found in 8 cases (5.6%). The changes in p53 expression after treatment were mainly confined to p53-positive tumors at baseline. Primary BC negative for p53 expression at the first biopsy became p53 positive at mastectomy in only four cases (2.8%). As far as bcl-2 expression is concerned, more than 10% increase after treatment has been found in 20 cases (13.9%), whereas a decrease (>10%) has been observed in 18 patients (12.4%). Four patients (2.8%) with bcl-2-negative BC at the first biopsy had the oncogene expressed in their tumor at mastectomy.

Relationship among p53 and bcl-2 Expression and Clinical and Biological Characteristics of Primary BC.
The relationships among p53, bcl-2, tumor dimension, lymph node involvement, and other biological indices of aggressiveness, such as histological grade, ER status, c-erbB2, and Ki67, are depicted on Table 3Citation . Because the difference in cCR between p53-positive and -negative primary BC was statistically significant for p53 stained in more than or equal to 10% cells, this cutoff was introduced in the statistical analysis; conversely, a cutoff of 30% positive cells for bcl-2 has been selected according to the literature (36) . Neither p53 expression nor bcl-2 expression showed a significant correlation with the node involvement; bcl-2 but not p53 was inversely related with tumor staging. A strong inverse relationship was found between p53 and bcl-2 status, and both markers showed opposite patterns when related to the other biological parameters. bcl-2 was directly correlated with the steroid hormone receptor status and inversely correlated with c-erbB2, Ki67, and gp-170 expression. p53 was inversely correlated with the ER/PgR expression and showed a direct relationship with Ki67 expression, histological grade, c-erb2, and gp-170 positivity. No statistical differences have been found between bcl-2 expression and histological grade.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3 Relationship among p53, bcl-2, and clinical/biological characteristics of primary breast cancer at first biopsy

 
Multivariate Regression Analysis for cCr.
A number of variables evaluated before treatment administration, such as menopausal status, tumor status, node status, histology grade, steroid hormone receptor status, and c-erbB2, Ki67, p53, gp-170, and bcl-2 expression were tested in a multivariate regression analysis to check their association with cCr to treatment. The treatment administered (CMF ± tamoxifen or epirubicin) was also included. p53 expression (estimated regression coefficient, B = -1.45; P < 0.04) and epirubicin administration (B = -1.00; P < 0.03) were the two independent variables inversely associated with the cCR to treatment, whereas the remaining variables did not enter the model.


    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The selection of patients with early BC to be submitted to chemotherapy is based on clinical and biological characteristics, such as lymph node status, steroid hormone receptor status, oncogene expression, and markers of proliferation activity, which are indicators of prognosis but not necessarily markers of likelihood of response.

To assess whether the two most studied inhibitors of apoptosis, the bcl-2 gene and the mutant p53 gene, may play a role in modulating response of BC to PC, patients submitted to two different chemotherapy regimens in neoadjuvant setting have been evaluated in the present study.

The relationship in the process of apoptosis between the bcl-2 and p53 genes is not completely clear; however, it has been observed that bcl-2 can inhibit apoptosis triggered by wild-type p53 (37) . Analysis of multiple human BC cell lines with antibodies against p53 and bcl-2 revealed that the expression of the two proteins is in most of the cases reversed (37, 38, 39) . This finding suggests that mutant p53 could determine bcl-2 down-regulation. We confirm that p53 and bcl-2 expressions are reciprocally correlated, and both markers have inverse relationships with respect to the other prognostic factors. Our data are in keeping with the concepts that the bcl-2 expression is related to more indolent and scarcely aggressive tumors (22, 23, 24, 25) , whereas the abrogation of p53 function leads to a more aggressive tumor biology (40 , 41) .

As a whole, bcl-2 expression did not show any relationship with the cCR, whereas mutated p53 was a significant predictor for poor cCR rate. The cCR more frequent in p53-negative primary BC is consistent with previous data, showing that the responsiveness of tumors to cytotoxic therapy in part derives from the tendency of malignant cells to undergo apoptosis in response to DNA damage (2 , 3) . In addition, this study suggests that the poor prognostic role for relapse of the mutated p53 tumor suppressor gene is not only because it is a molecular sign of genomic instability (which increases the likelihood that cells will acquire further mutations; Ref. 42 ) but also because it is a marker of resistance to cytotoxic drugs administered in adjuvant setting.

bcl-2 expression in BC patients has been repeatedly found to be related to a good prognosis (22 , 36) and to a greater chance to obtain response to endocrine therapy (25) . The absence of relationship between bcl-2 expression and cytotoxic drug activity in our series is in agreement with the results of van Slooten et al. (43) , showing that this marker does not predict response to one course of perioperative chemotherapy.

Dividing patients according to the treatment administered, the predictive effect of the p53 status on the cCR was more evident in the subgroup of patients submitted to epirubicin than in the subset of cases submitted to CMF ± tamoxifen, in whom only a trend of lower cCR rate has been observed in p53+ tumors (at a cutoff of 10% positive cells) in comparison to p53– ones. In a multivariate analysis, however, when adjusting for treatment administered and a number of baseline clinical and biological parameters, the p53 status maintained an independent predictive role for cCR.

It is well known that P-glycoprotein encoded by the MDR1 gene is a predictor of chemoresistance of a number of chemotherapeutic drugs, such as anthracyclines and Vinca alkaloids, but not as far as antimetabolites, such as 5-Fluorouracil and Methotrexate, are concerned (44) . The mutant tumor suppressor p53 protein has been shown to activate the MDR1 promoter, whereas the wild-type p53 repressed this activity in cultured cells (45) . Our data are in keeping with these observations, because p53 and gp-170 depicted a strong direct correlation. In addition, gp-170 expression, being reciprocally related to p53 and bcl-2, showed a negative relationship with bcl-2. The cCR obtained in the 8.0% of our gp-170-positive tumors submitted to epirubicin was consistently lower than cCR (22%) in gp-170-negative ones. By contrast, patients submitted to CMF ± tamoxifen did not show any difference in cCR according to the gp-170 status. Because gp-170 is mainly expressed in p53-positive BC, this correlation may be, at least in part, responsible for the difference in activity between the two treatments according to the p53 immunostaining.

Controversial data have been published as regard as the role of p53 in conferring increased resistance to antitumor agents (15) . Lack of unanimity of results may be attributable to differences in technique, study design, or patient population. Our data suggest that the different cytotoxic treatments adopted may have contributed to the variation within the literature in the effect of p53 status upon therapeutic responsiveness.

As an example, the CMF regimen was used in three studies that failed to find a relationship between p53 status and chemotherapy efficacy (46, 47, 48) , whereas an anthracycline-containing regimen was used in one study (49) that showed an association between p53 accumulation and poor treatment response (Table 4)Citation .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4 Predictive value of p53 status on tumor responsiveness to adjuvant chemotherapy (published data)

 
The DNA damage induced by the cytotoxic agents can potentially favor the mutation of the p53 gene. We therefore analyzed tumor tissue pairs before and after PC for their stability of the p53 phenotype. Most of the tumors undergoing changes in percentage of p53 expression after treatment originally harbored mutant protein, and only four BC specimens negative for p53 staining before chemotherapy became positive afterward. These data, obtained on a large series of matched BC samples, support the concept that p53 mutation reflects a clonal selection process occurring among the tumor cell population and is not inducible by at least three or four chemotherapy cycles. Also, bcl-2 expression was found to be a stable phenotype, as only four patients with oncogene-negative BC before chemotherapy become positive afterward. The relatively short-term exposure of BC cells to cytotoxic agents may have accounted for the absence of changes in protein expression. Our data are consistent with a previous study failing to show changes in oncogene expression in BC as a consequence of PC (50) .

To conclude, PC administered to BC patients can provide new insights into mechanisms involved in tumor sensitivity or resistance to cytotoxic agents. An incision biopsy at diagnosis is necessary to obtain adequate tumor samples for biological evaluation before treatment. The status of the p53 gene, which is mutated in a high percentage of breast tumors, is not only a prognostic marker but also a predictive factor for cytotoxic drug activity, particularly as far as anthracyclines are concerned. By contrast, bcl-2 is a good prognostic marker, but fails to be related to chemotherapy activity.

The relatively small sample size may limit the generalization of the results, and the Ps should be interpreted with a correction for multiple comparisons. These limitations notwithstanding, this explorative analysis could offer a valid background for further confirmatory research.

In addition, increasing amounts of data have shown that the assumption that increased p53 staining implies mutant p53 may not be valid in all circumstances. In some cases, increased staining may be attributable to wild type overexpression; likewise, negative cells may not necessarily have normal p53 function (15) . It would be helpful in the future to use molecular techniques in addition to immunostaining to assess the p53 status. Moreover, it is not clear why bcl-2, although it promotes tumor cell survival by blocking programmed cell survival, represents in BC patients a molecular sign of favorable prognosis. Probably, the determination of bcl-2 status alone is not sufficient in assessing the competency of the bcl-2 apoptosis pathway. The assessment of levels of the other member of the bcl-2 family (i.e., bax; Ref. 51 ) may better determine the extent to which apoptosis may occur as well as whether or not dysfunction in this pathway is present.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank our nursing staff (Monia Balzani, Oriana Cervi, Rina Leonardi, Francesca Ronchi, and Nicoletta Zilioli) for their cooperation.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Presented in part at the XXV ISOBM meeting (Montreux, Switzerland, 1997), at the XXXIV American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting (Los Angeles, USA, 1998), at the 1st International Symposium on Primary Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Breast Cancer (Cremona, Italy, 1998), and at the XXIII ESMO meeting (Athens, Greece, 1998). Financial support was provided by the Association Amici dell’Ospedale di Cremona. Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Oncologia Medica, Azienda Ospedaliera San Luigi, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043 Orbassano, Italy. Phone: 0039-11-90-26-512; Fax: 0039-11-90-26-676; E-mail: luigi.dogliotti{at}unito.it Back

3 The abbreviations used are: BC, breast cancer; cCR, clinical complete response; CMF, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil; MDR, multidrug resistance; PC, primary chemotherapy; PgR, progesterone receptor; PR, partial response. Back

Received 6/ 3/99; revised 3/15/00; accepted 3/28/00.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Goldie J. H., Coldman A. J. The genetic origin of drug resistance in neoplasms: implications for systemic therapy. Cancer Res., 44: 3643-3653, 1984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Kerr J. F. R., Winterford C. M., Harmon B. V. Apoptosis. Cancer (Phila.), 73: 2013-2026, 1994.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Lowe S. W., Ruley H. E., Jacks T., Housman D. E. p53 dependent apoptosis modulates the cytotoxicity of anticancer agents. Cell, 74: 957-967, 1993.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Raff M. C. Social control on cell survival and cell death. Nature (Lond.), 356: 397-400, 1992.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Yonish-Rouach E., Rensmitzki D., Lotem J., Sachs L., Kimchi A., Oren M. Wild-type p53 induces apoptosis of myeloid leukemic cells that is inhibited by interleukin 6. Nature (Lond.), 352: 345-347, 1991.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Shaw P., Bovey R., Tardy S., Sahli R., Sordat B., Costa J. Induction of apoptosis by wild-type p53 in a human colon derived cell line. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89: 4495-4499, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Evan G. I., Willie A. H., Gilbert C. S., Littlewood T. D., Land H., Brooks M., Waters C. M., Penn L. Z., Hancock D. C. Induction of apoptosis in fibroblasts by c-myc protein. Cell, 69: 119-128, 1992.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Vaux D. L., Cory S., Adams J. bcl-2 gene promotes haematopoietic cell survival and cooperates with c-myc to immortalize pre B-cells. Nature (Lond.), 335: 440-442, 1988.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Korsmeyer S. bcl-2 initiates a new category of oncogenes: regulators of cell death. Blood, 80: 879-886, 1992.[Free Full Text]
  10. Lotem J., Sachs L. Regulation by bcl-2, c-myc, and p53 susceptibility to induction of apoptosis by heat shock and cancer chemotherapy compounds in differentiation-competent and -defective myeloid leukemic cells. Cell Growth Differ., 4: 41-47, 1993.[Abstract]
  11. Lowe S. W., Bodis S., McClatchey A., Remington L., Ruley H. E., Fisher D. E., Housman D. E., Jacks T. p53 status and the efficacy of cancer therapy in vivo. Science (Washington DC)., 266: 807-810, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Fujiwara, T., Grimm, E. A., Mukhopadhyay, T., Zang, W. W., Owe-Schaub, and Roth, J. A. Induction of chemosensitivity in human lung cancer cells in vivo by adenovirus-mediated transfer of the wild-type p53 gene. Cancer Res., 54: 2287–2291, 1994.
  13. Chiba I., Takahashi T. A., Nau M. M., D’Amico D., Curiel D. T., Mitsudomi T., Buchhagen D. L., Carbone D., Piantadosi S., Koga H. Mutations in the p53 gene are frequent in primary, resected non-small cell lung cancer. Oncogene, 5: 1603-1610, 1990.[Medline]
  14. Yamaguchi A., Nakagawara G., Kurosaka Y., Nishimura G., Yonemura Y., Miyazaki I. p53 immunoreaction in endoscopic biopsy specimens of colorectal cancer, and its prognostic significance. Br. J. Cancer, 68: 399-402, 1993.[Medline]
  15. Elledge R. M., Allred R. C. Prognostic and predictive value of p53 and p21 in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 52: 79-98, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Ramqvist T., Magnusson K. P., Wang Y., Szekely L., Klein G., Wilman K. G. Wild-type p53 induced apoptosis in a Burkitt lymphoma (BL) line that carries mutant p53. Oncogene, 8: 1495-1500, 1993.[Medline]
  17. Peng H. Q., Hogg D., Malkin D., Bailey D., Gallie B. L., Bulbul M., Jewett M., Buchanan J., Goss P. E. Mutations of the p53 gene do not occur in testis cancer. Cancer Res., 53: 3574-3578, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Fisher C. J., Gillett C. E., Vojtèsek B., Barnes D. M., Millis R. R. Problems with p53 immunohistochemical staining: the effect of fixation and variation in the methods of evaluation. Br. J. Cancer, 69: 26-31, 1994.[Medline]
  19. Reed J. C. bcl-2 and the regulation of programmed cell death. J. Cell Biol., 124: 1-6, 1994.[Free Full Text]
  20. Castle V. P., Heidelberger K. P., Bromberg J., Ou X., Dole M., Nunez G. Expression of the apoptosis-suppressing protein bcl-2 in neuroblastoma is associated with unfavorable histology and N-myc amplification. Am. J. Pathol., 143: 1543-1550, 1993.[Abstract]
  21. Campos L., Rouaoult J. P., Sabido O., Oriol P., Roubi N., Vasselon C., Archimbaud E., Magaud J. P., Guyotat D. High expression of bcl-2 protein in acute myeloid leukemia cells is associated to poor response to chemotherapy. Blood., 81: 3091-3096, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Gasparini G., Barbareschi M., Doglioni C., Palma P. D., Mauri F. A., Boracchi P., Bevilacqua P., Caffo O., Morelli L., Verderio P., Pezzella F., Harris A. L. Expression of bcl-2 protein predicts efficacy of adjuvant treatments in operable node-positive breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res., 1: 189-198, 1995.[Abstract]
  23. Joensuu H., Pylkkanen L., Toikkanen S. bcl-2 protein expression and long-term survival in breast cancer. Am. J. Pathol., 145: 1191-1198, 1994.[Abstract]
  24. Hellemans P., van Dam P. A., Weyler J., van Oosterom A. T., Buytaert P., Van Marck E. Prognostic value of bcl-2 expression in invasive breast cancer. Br. J. Cancer, 72: 354-360, 1995.[Medline]
  25. Elledge R. M., Green S., Howes L., Clark G. M., Berardo M., Allred D. C., Pugh R., Ciocca D., Ravdin P., O’Sallivan J., Rivkin S., Martino S., Osborne C. K. Bcl-2, p53, and response to tamoxifen in estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a southwest oncology group study. J. Clin. Oncol., 15: 1916-1922, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Bonadonna, G., Veronesi, U., Brambilla, C., Ferrari, L., Luini, A., Greco, M., Bartoli, C., Coopmans, de Yoldi, Zucali, R., Rilke, F., Andreola, S., Silvestrini, R., Di Fronzo, G., and Valagussa, P. Primary chemotherapy to avoid mastectomy in tumors with diameters of three centimeters or more. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 82: 1539–1545, 1990.
  27. Bélémbaogo, E., Feillel, V., Chollet, P., Curè, H., Verrelle, P., Kwiatkowski, Achard, J. L., Le Bouedec, G., Chassagne, J., Bignon, Y. J., de Latour, M., Lafaye, C., and Dauplat, J. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 126 operable breast cancers. Eur. J. Cancer, 28A: 4/5: 896–900, 1992.
  28. Mauriac L., Durand M., Avril A., Dihuydy J. M. Effects of primary chemotherapy in conservative treatment of breast cancer patients with operable tumors larger than 3 cm. Ann. Oncol., 2: 347-354, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Fisher B., Bryant J., Wolmark N., Mamounas E., Brown A., Fisher E. R., Wickerham D. L., Begovic M., DeCillis A., Robidoux A., Margolese R. G., Cruz A. B., Jr., Hoehn J. L., Lees A. W., Dimitrov N. V., Bear H. D. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol., 16: 2672-2685, 1998.[Abstract]
  30. Bonadonna G., Valagussa P., Brambilla C., Ferrari L., Molinterni A., Terenziani M., Zambetti M. Primary chemotherapy in operable breast cancer: eight-years experience at the Milan Cancer Institute. J. Clin. Oncol., 16: 93-100, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. WHO. WHO handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment. WHO Offset Publication. Geneva, Switzerland: UICC, 1978.
  32. Elston C. W., Ellis I. O. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer; experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology, 19: 403-410, 1991.[Medline]
  33. McCarty K. S., Jr., Miller L. S., Cox E. B., Konrath J., McCarty K. S., Sr. Estrogen receptor analyses. Correlation of biochemical and immunohistochemical methods using monoclonal antireceptor antibodies. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med., 109: 716-721, 1985.[Medline]
  34. Robertson J. F. R., Ellis I. O., Elston C. V., Blamey R. W. Mastectomy or tamoxifen as initial therapy for operable breast cancer in elderly patients: 5-years follow-up. Eur. J. Cancer, 28: 908-910, 1992.[CrossRef]
  35. Norusis, M. J. SPSS/PC+ Base manual for the IBM PC/XT/AT and PS/2. Chicago: SPSS Inc. 1988.
  36. Silvestrini R., Veneroni S., Daidone M. G., Benini E., Boracchi P., Mezzetti M., Di Fronzo G., Rilke F., Veronesi U. The bcl-2 protein: a prognostic indicator strongly related to p53 protein in lymph node-negative breast cancer patients. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 86: 499-504, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Wang Y., Szekely L., Okan I., Klein G., Wiman K. G. Wild-type p53 triggered apoptosis is inhibited by bcl-2 in a v-myc-induced T-cell lymphoma line. Oncogene, 8: 3427-3431, 1993.[Medline]
  38. Haldar S., Negrini M., Monne M., Sabbioni S., Croce C. M. Down-regulation of bcl-2 by p53 in breast cancer cells. Cancer Res., 54: 2095-2097, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Lee W. Y., Jin Y. T., Tzeng C. C. Reciprocal expression of bcl-2 and p53 in breast ductal carcinoma. Anticancer Res., 16: 3007-3012, 1996.[Medline]
  40. Silvestrini R., Benini E., Daidone M. G., Veneroni S., Boracchi P., Cappelletti V., Di Fronzo G., Veronesi U. p53 as an independent prognostic marker in lymph node-negative breast cancer patients. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 85: 965-970, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Isola J., Visakorpi T., Holli K., Kallionemi O. P. Association of overexpression of tumor suppressor protein p53 with rapid cell proliferation and poor prognosis in node-negative breast cancer patients. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 84: 1109-1114, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Kastan M. B., Zhan Q., El-Deiry W. S., Carrier F., Jacks T., Walsh W. V., Plunkett B. S., Vogelstein B., Fornace A. J., Jr. A mammalian cell cycle checkpoint pathway utilizing p53 and GADD45 is defective in ataxia-teleangectasia. Cell, 71: 587-597, 1992.[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. van Slooten, H. J., Clahsen, P. C., van Dierendonck, Duval, C., Pallud, C., Mandard, A. M., Delobelle-Deroide, A., van de Velde, C. J. H., and van de Vijer, M. J. Expression of bcl-2 in node-negative breast cancer is associated with various prognostic factors, but does not predict response to one course of perioperative chemotherapy. Br. J. Cancer, 74: 78–85, 1996.
  44. Beck, W. T., and Dalton, W. S. Mechanisms of drug resistance. In W. T. De Vita, Jr., S. Hellman, and S. A. Rosember (eds.), Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology, Ed. 5, pp. 498–512. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott, 1997.
  45. Thottassery J. V., Zambetti G. P., Arimori K., Schuetz E. G., Schuetz J. D. p53-dependent regulation of the MDR1 gene expression causes selective resistance to chemotherapeutic agents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94: 11037-11042, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Gasparini G. P., Toi M., Verderio P., Ranieri G., Dante S., Bonoldi E., Boracchi P., Fanelli M., Tominaga T. Prognostic significance of p53, angiogenesis, and other conventional features in operable breast cancer: subanalysis in node-positive and node-negative patients. Int. J. Oncol., 12: 1117-1125, 1998.[Medline]
  47. Degeorges A., de Roquancourt A., Extra G. M., Espie M., Bourstyn E., de Cremoux P., Soussi T., Marty M. Is p53 a protein that predicts the response to chemotherapy in node negative breast cancer?. Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 47: 47-55, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Elledge R. M., Gray R., Mansour E., Yu Y., Clark G. M., Ravdin P., Osborne C. K., Gilchrist K., Davidson N. E., Robert N. Accumulation of p53 protein as a possible predictor of response to adjuvant combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil and prednisone for breast cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 82: 1254-1256, 1995.
  49. Clahsen P. C., van de Velde C. J. H., Duval C., Pallud C., Mandard A. M., Delobelle-Deroide A., van den Broek L., Sahmoud T. M., van de Vijver M. J. p53 protein accumulation and response to adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal women with node negative early breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol, 16: 470-479, 1998.[Abstract]
  50. Linn S. C., Pinedo H. M., van Ark-Otte J., van der Valk P., Hoekman K., Honkoop A. H., Vermorken J. B., Giaccone G. Expression of drug resistance proteins in breast cancer, in relation to chemotherapy. Int. J. Cancer, 71: 787-795, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
  51. Brambilla E., Gazzeri S., Lantuejoul S., Coll J. L., Moro D., Negoescu A., Brambilla C. p53 mutant immunophenotype and deregulation of p53 transcription pathway (Bcl2, Bax, and Wafl1) in precursor bronchial lesions of lung cancer. Clin. Cancer Res., 4: 1609-1618, 1998.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
F.-C. Bidard, M.-C. Matthieu, P. Chollet, I. Raoefils, C. Abrial, J. Domont, M. Spielmann, S. Delaloge, F. Andre, and F. Penault-Llorca
p53 status and efficacy of primary anthracyclines/alkylating agent-based regimen according to breast cancer molecular classes
Ann. Onc., July 1, 2008; 19(7): 1261 - 1265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
C. Shimizu, M. Ando, T. Kouno, N. Katsumata, and Y. Fujiwara
Current Trends and Controversies over Pre-operative Chemotherapy for Women with Operable Breast Cancer
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., January 3, 2007; (2007) hyl122v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
V Malamou-Mitsi, H Gogas, U Dafni, A Bourli, T Fillipidis, M Sotiropoulou, D Vlachodimitropoulos, S Papadopoulos, O Tzaida, G Kafiri, et al.
Evaluation of the prognostic and predictive value of p53 and Bcl-2 in breast cancer patients participating in a randomized study with dose-dense sequential adjuvant chemotherapy
Ann. Onc., October 1, 2006; 17(10): 1504 - 1511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
D. Generali, S. B Fox, A. Berruti, M. P Brizzi, L. Campo, S. Bonardi, S. M Wigfield, P. Bruzzi, A. Bersiga, G. Allevi, et al.
Role of carbonic anhydrase IX expression in prediction of the efficacy and outcome of primary epirubicin/tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer.
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2006; 13(3): 921 - 930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. Bottini, D. Generali, M. P. Brizzi, S. B. Fox, A. Bersiga, S. Bonardi, G. Allevi, S. Aguggini, G. Bodini, M. Milani, et al.
Randomized Phase II Trial of Letrozole and Letrozole Plus Low-Dose Metronomic Oral Cyclophosphamide As Primary Systemic Treatment in Elderly Breast Cancer Patients
J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 2006; 24(22): 3623 - 3628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
D. Generali, A. Berruti, M. P. Brizzi, L. Campo, S. Bonardi, S. Wigfield, A. Bersiga, G. Allevi, M. Milani, S. Aguggini, et al.
Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1{alpha} Expression Predicts a Poor Response to Primary Chemoendocrine Therapy and Disease-Free Survival in Primary Human Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2006; 12(15): 4562 - 4568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
T. A. Buchholz, A. K. Garg, N. Chakravarti, B. B. Aggarwal, F. J. Esteva, H. M. Kuerer, S. E. Singletary, G. N. Hortobagyi, L. Pusztai, M. Cristofanilli, et al.
The Nuclear Transcription Factor {kappa}B/bcl-2 Pathway Correlates with Pathologic Complete Response to Doxorubicin-Based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Human Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2005; 11(23): 8398 - 8402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
A Bottini, A Berruti, M P Brizzi, A Bersiga, D Generali, G Allevi, S Aguggini, G Bolsi, S Bonardi, B Tondelli, et al.
Cytotoxic and antiproliferative activity of the single agent epirubicin versus epirubicin plus tamoxifen as primary chemotherapy in human breast cancer: a single-institution phase III trial
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2005; 12(2): 383 - 392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Geisler, A.-L. Borresen-Dale, H. Johnsen, T. Aas, J. Geisler, L. A. Akslen, G. Anker, and P. E. Lonning
TP53 Gene Mutations Predict the Response to Neoadjuvant Treatment with 5-Fluorouracil and Mitomycin in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2003; 9(15): 5582 - 5588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
A. Bottini, L. Dogliotti, A. Bersiga, M. P. Brizzi, and A. Berruti
p53 expression and disease outcome of breast cancer patients undergoing primary chemotherapy with anthracycline-containing regimens
Ann. Onc., July 1, 2003; 14(7): 1156 - 1156.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. Bottini, A. Berruti, A. Bersiga, M. P. Brizzi, G. Allevi, G. Bolsi, S. Aguggini, A. Brunelli, E. Betri, D. Generali, et al.
Changes in Microvessel Density As Assessed by CD34 Antibodies after Primary Chemotherapy in Human Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2002; 8(6): 1816 - 1821.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. Sjostrom, C. Blomqvist, K. von Boguslawski, N.-O. Bengtsson, I. Mjaaland, P. Malmstrom, B. Ostenstadt, E. Wist, V. Valvere, S. Takayama, et al.
The Predictive Value of bcl-2, bax, bcl-xL, bag-1, fas, and fasL for Chemotherapy Response in Advanced Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2002; 8(3): 811 - 816.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bottini, A.
Right arrow Articles by Dogliotti, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bottini, A.
Right arrow Articles by Dogliotti, L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book