
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Minireview |
Departments of Pathology [R. H. H., M. G., J. P., S. E. K.], Oncology [R. H. H., M. G., S. E. K.], and Gastroenterology [M. G.], The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21287
It has been >10 years since Vogelstein and colleagues (1 , 2) proposed a progression model for colorectal neoplasia in which they hypothesized that the progression from normal colonic epithelium, to small adenomatous polyps, to infiltrating adenocarcinoma is associated with the activation of oncogenes and the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes. Mutations in the APC gene initiate the adenomatous process, resulting in the clonal growth of a single cell (3, 4, 5) . Over the years, additional mutations can occur in these adenomas, resulting in waves of clonal expansion and competition among persistent subclones, increasing severity of dysplasia, and eventually in the development of an invasive adenocarcinoma (1 , 2 , 6 , 7) . This genetic progression model not only has formed the basis of our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the development of colorectal neoplasia, but it also has important implications for chemoprevention, for the development of genetic screening tests for the presymptomatic diagnosis of colorectal carcinomas, and for the development of prognostic genetic markers (8, 9, 10) .
Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer death in both men and women; yet, at the time the progression model was proposed for colorectal neoplasms, remarkably little was known about pancreatic cancer. For example, in 1988, the only significant genetic alteration that had been identified in pancreatic cancer was mutation of the K-ras oncogene (11) . The last 10 years has seen, however, an explosion in our understanding of pancreatic cancer, and pancreatic cancer is now one of the better characterized neoplasms at the genetic level. We believe that there is now sufficient pathological, clinical, and genetic evidence for us to develop a rational progression model for pancreatic cancer.
The first clue that there may be a distinctive precursor lesion to infiltrating adenocarcinoma of the pancreas came from careful morphological studies (12) . In 1976, Cubilla and Fitzgerald (13) reported a seminal paper in which they identified histologically distinct proliferative lesions in the pancreatic ducts and ductules adjacent to infiltrating adenocarcinomas of the pancreas. They called these duct lesions "hyperplasias" and showed that they were more common in pancreata with cancer than they were in pancreata without cancer. Kozuka et al. (14) reported similar findings shortly thereafter, and more recently, Furukawa et al. (15) , using three-dimensional mapping techniques, have demonstrated a stepwise progression from mild dysplasia to severe dysplasia in these pancreatic duct lesions (14, 15, 16) . These observations were, however, static, and it was not universally agreed upon whether these pancreatic duct lesions represented the intraductal extension of an invasive cancer or a true precursor to invasive cancer (17) .
Clinical studies were needed to establish the temporal relationship between pancreatic duct lesions and invasive carcinoma. These studies proved to be more difficult then one might hope because, unlike the colon, skin, breast, cervix, and prostate, the pancreas is not readily accessible to biopsy. Nonetheless, Brat et al. (18) have reported three patients who developed infiltrating ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma 17 months to 10 years after the histological identification of atypical papillary duct lesions in their pancreata. Similarly, Brockie et al. (19) reported two patients with atypical papillary duct lesions who developed invasive pancreatic ductal carcinomas years later. Although there have only been a handful of such cases reported, they provide strong support that duct lesions in the pancreas can progress to invasive cancer (20) .
Molecular genetic analyses have provided the third and most convincing
line of evidence that pancreatic duct lesions are the precursors to
infiltrating adenocarcinomas of the pancreas. Almost all of the genetic
alterations that have been identified in infiltrating ductal
adenocarcinomas of the pancreas have also been identified in these duct
lesions, and remarkably, the prevalence of these genetic alterations
increases as the degree of cytological and architectural atypia in the
duct lesions increases (Fig. 1
; Refs. 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27
).
|
45% of
papillary pancreatic duct lesions without atypia harbor
K-ras gene mutations, and the prevalence of these mutations
in K-ras increases with increasing degrees of atypia in the
duct lesions (reviewed in Ref. 22
). These alterations in
K-ras and Her-2/neu are believed to be
"early" genetic events in the development of pancreatic neoplasia
because they occur in pancreatic duct lesions with minimal atypia.
Inactivation of the p16 tumor suppressor gene appears to
occur slightly later. For example, the p16 tumor suppressor
gene is located on chromosome 9p, and Yamano et al.
(32)
have shown loss of heterozygosity at 9p in
13% of
histologically low-grade pancreatic duct lesions, whereas 90% of the
histologically high-grade duct lesions that they examined had loss of
heterozygosity of this chromosome arm. Similarly, Moskaluk et
al. (24)
microdissected a series of duct lesions and
demonstrated biallelic inactivation of the p16 gene in three
of nine duct lesions. Wilentz et al. (23)
extended these observations by immunohistochemically labeling over 125
pancreatic duct lesions for the p16 gene product. They not
only confirmed that p16 is frequently inactivated, but they
also correlated the loss of p16 gene expression with the
severity cytological and architectural atypia in the duct lesions
(23)
. Nine (30%) of 30 flat, 4 (27%) of 15 papillary, 37
(55%) of 67 papillary with atypia, and 10 (71%) of 14 carcinomas
in situ duct lesions showed loss of p16 expression
(23)
. The differences in p16 expression between the flat
and papillary lesions and between the nonatypical and atypical duct
lesions were statistically significant. Thus, loss of p16 expression
occurs most frequently, but not exclusively, in higher-grade duct
lesions.
Loss of the p53, DPC4, and BRCA2 tumor suppressor genes appears to occur late in the development of pancreatic neoplasia. Loss of heterozygosity at chromosome 17p (the location of the p53 gene) and at 18q (the location of the DPC4 gene), loss of DPC4 gene expression, abnormalities of p53 gene expression, and biallelic inactivation of the BRCA2 tumor suppressor gene have all also been reported in pancreatic duct lesions (22 , 26 , 27 , 32 , 33) . However, in contrast to K-ras, HER-2/neu, and p16, these gene abnormalities appear to occur almost exclusively in duct lesions with significant cytological and architectural atypia (carcinoma in situ; reviewed in Refs. 22 and 34 ).
The timing of DNA methylation, of telomerase activation, and of a number of low frequency genetic alterations, such as inactivation of the MKK4, STK11, ALK5, and TGFBR2 tumor suppressor genes, remains to be defined (35, 36, 37, 38) .
These pathological, clinical, and molecular observations can now form the foundation for a progression model for pancreatic cancer. Just as there is a progression in the colorectum from normal colonic epithelium, to adenoma, to infiltrating carcinoma, so too is there a progression in the pancreas from normal ductal epithelium, to duct lesions, to invasive ductal adenocarcinoma (20) . This progression is associated with multiple genetic alterations including activating point mutations in the K-ras gene, the overexpression of HER-2/neu, and the inactivation of the p16, p53, DPC4, and occasionally BRCA2 tumor suppressor genes. Although APC appears to be the "gatekeeper" gene in the development of colonic neoplasia, a gatekeeper gene for the initiation of pancreatic neoplasia has not been identified (3) .
This model has a number of important implications:
(a) If we define a neoplasm as a clonal cell population that has highly patterned alterations in cancer-causing genes, then pancreatic duct lesions are true neoplasms. The nomenclature should reflect the neoplastic nature of these lesions, and indeed, the terminology PanIN3 was proposed by the National Cancer Institute- sponsored Pancreatic Think Tank held in Park City, Utah in September 1999.4
(b) This progression model suggests that molecular genetic based screening tests can be developed to detect early pancreatic neoplasms before they have spread beyond the gland (39 , 40) . For example, mutant K-ras genes can be detected in samples of duodenal fluid and stool from patients with pancreatic cancer, and Berthélemy et al. (41) have demonstrated that these genetic alterations may be present in samples of pancreatic secretions more than a year before a neoplasm is clinically apparent in the pancreas (28 , 41, 42, 43, 44) .
(c) This progression model suggests that these early pancreatic duct lesions in the pancreas might also be reasonable targets for chemoprevention (45 , 46) . For example, the progression model for colorectal carcinoma has formed the basis for chemoprevention trials in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (10) . Similarly, patients with an inherited susceptibility to pancreatic cancer may also be a reasonable group to study the benefit of chemoprevention of pancreatic cancer (37 , 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52) .
What doesnt this model suggest? This model doesnt imply that all PanINs progress to infiltrating carcinomas. Indeed, low-grade PanINs probably only rarely, if ever, progress, akin to aberrant crypt foci in the colon (53) . Additional studies are needed to determine whether specific morphological findings or genetic abnormalities can predict which PanINs have a significant risk of progressing. The model also does not rule out other pathways for the development of infiltrating ductal adenocarcinomas. For example, it is possible that carcinomas with DNA replication errors progress through an alternate pathway (54) . Additional studies are needed to examine such possibilities.
In summary, infiltrating carcinomas of the pancreas appear to arise from histologically well-defined precursor lesions in the small ducts and ductules of the pancreas. These lesions, called PanINs, harbor a number of well-characterized genetic alterations. A better understanding of the genetic progression in the pancreas will form the basis for future early detection and chemoprevention studies.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported by NIH Grant P50-CA 62924. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, at The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Meyer 7-181, 600 North Wolfe
Street, Baltimore, MD 21287. Phone: (410) 955-9132; Fax:
(410) 955-0115; E-mail: rhruban{at}jhmi.edu ![]()
3 The abbreviation used is: PanIN, pancreatic
intraepithelial neoplasia. ![]()
4 Internet address:
http://pathology.jhu.edu/pancreas_panin. ![]()
Received 1/26/00; revised 4/24/00; accepted 5/ 8/00.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Chaturvedi, A. P. Singh, and S. K. Batra Structure, evolution, and biology of the MUC4 mucin FASEB J, April 1, 2008; 22(4): 966 - 981. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Tarafa, D. Tuck, D. Ladner, M. Topazian, R. Brand, C. Deters, V. Moreno, G. Capella, H. Lynch, P. Lizardi, et al. Mutational load distribution analysis yields metrics reflecting genetic instability during pancreatic carcinogenesis PNAS, March 18, 2008; 105(11): 4306 - 4311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Gordon, M. Dong, E. M. Chislock, T. A. Fields, and G. C. Blobe Loss of type III transforming growth factor {beta} receptor expression increases motility and invasiveness associated with epithelial to mesenchymal transition during pancreatic cancer progression Carcinogenesis, February 1, 2008; 29(2): 252 - 262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Schmidt, C. H. Park, A. U. Ahmed, J. H. Gundelach, N. R. Reed, S. Cheng, B. E. Knudsen, and A. H. Tang Inhibition of RAS-Mediated Transformation and Tumorigenesis by Targeting the Downstream E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Seven in Absentia Homologue Cancer Res., December 15, 2007; 67(24): 11798 - 11810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Clark, S. R. Hingorani, R. Mick, C. Combs, D. A. Tuveson, and R. H. Vonderheide Dynamics of the Immune Reaction to Pancreatic Cancer from Inception to Invasion Cancer Res., October 1, 2007; 67(19): 9518 - 9527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L Gullo, M Migliori, P Fusaroli, and G Caletti Familial association of benign pancreatic hyperenzymaemia and pancreatic cancer Gut, September 1, 2007; 56(9): 1323 - 1324. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kojima, S. M. Vickers, N. V. Adsay, N. C. Jhala, H.-G. Kim, T. R. Schoeb, W. E. Grizzle, and C. A. Klug Inactivation of Smad4 Accelerates KrasG12D-Mediated Pancreatic Neoplasia Cancer Res., September 1, 2007; 67(17): 8121 - 8130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Ghaneh, E. Costello, and J. P Neoptolemos Biology and management of pancreatic cancer Gut, August 1, 2007; 56(8): 1134 - 1152. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Soliman, A.-C. Lo, M. Banerjee, N. El-Ghawalby, H. M. Khaled, S. Bayoumi, I. A. Seifeldin, A. Abdel-Aziz, J. L. Abbruzzese, J. K. Greenson, et al. Differences in K-ras and p53 gene mutations among pancreatic adenocarcinomas associated with regional environmental pollution Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2007; 28(8): 1794 - 1799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. J. Gaspar, L. Li, A. M. Kapoun, S. Medicherla, M. Reddy, G. Li, G. O'Young, D. Quon, M. Henson, D. L. Damm, et al. Inhibition of Transforming Growth Factor beta Signaling Reduces Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Growth and Invasiveness Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2007; 72(1): 152 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Zhu, G. Shi, C. Max. Schmidt, R. H. Hruban, and S. F. Konieczny Acinar Cells Contribute to the Molecular Heterogeneity of Pancreatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia Am. J. Pathol., July 1, 2007; 171(1): 263 - 273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Ji, F. C. Mei, J. Xie, and X. Cheng Oncogenic KRAS Activates Hedgehog Signaling Pathway in Pancreatic Cancer Cells J. Biol. Chem., May 11, 2007; 282(19): 14048 - 14055. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Morton, M. E. Mongeau, D. S. Klimstra, J. P. Morris, Y. C. Lee, Y. Kawaguchi, C. V. E. Wright, M. Hebrok, and B. C. Lewis Sonic hedgehog acts at multiple stages during pancreatic tumorigenesis PNAS, March 20, 2007; 104(12): 5103 - 5108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Xu, G. Rao, R. M. Quiros, A. W. Kim, H.-Q. Miao, G. J. Brunn, J. L. Platt, P. Gattuso, and R. A. Prinz In Vivo and in Vitro Degradation of Heparan Sulfate (HS) Proteoglycans by HPR1 in Pancreatic Adenocarcinomas: LOSS OF CELL SURFACE HS SUPPRESSES FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR 2-MEDIATED CELL SIGNALING AND PROLIFERATION J. Biol. Chem., January 26, 2007; 282(4): 2363 - 2373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Infante, H. Matsubayashi, N. Sato, J. Tonascia, A. P. Klein, T. A. Riall, C. Yeo, C. Iacobuzio-Donahue, and M. Goggins Peritumoral Fibroblast SPARC Expression and Patient Outcome With Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma J. Clin. Oncol., January 20, 2007; 25(3): 319 - 325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Hiraoka, K. Onozato, T. Kosuge, and S. Hirohashi Prevalence of FOXP3+ Regulatory T Cells Increases During the Progression of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Its Premalignant Lesions. Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2006; 12(18): 5423 - 5434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Thiagalingam A cascade of modules of a network defines cancer progression. Cancer Res., August 1, 2006; 66(15): 7379 - 7385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.-F. Peng, Y. Kanai, M. Sawada, S. Ushijima, N. Hiraoka, S. Kitazawa, and S. Hirohashi DNA methylation of multiple tumor-related genes in association with overexpression of DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) during multistage carcinogenesis of the pancreas Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2006; 27(6): 1160 - 1168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Hezel, A. C. Kimmelman, B. Z. Stanger, N. Bardeesy, and R. A. DePinho Genetics and biology of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Genes & Dev., May 15, 2006; 20(10): 1218 - 1249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Hayes, P. E. Carrigan, A. M. Beck, and L. J. Miller Targeting the RNA splicing machinery as a novel treatment strategy for pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer Res., April 1, 2006; 66(7): 3819 - 3827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Zhang, L. Chenwei, R. Mahmood, K. v. Golen, J. Greenson, G. Li, N. J. D'Silva, X. Li, C. F. Burant, C. D. Logsdon, et al. Identification of a Putative Tumor Suppressor Gene Rap1GAP in Pancreatic Cancer Cancer Res., January 15, 2006; 66(2): 898 - 906. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Matsubayashi, M. Canto, N. Sato, A. Klein, T. Abe, K. Yamashita, C. J. Yeo, A. Kalloo, R. Hruban, and M. Goggins DNA Methylation Alterations in the Pancreatic Juice of Patients with Suspected Pancreatic Disease Cancer Res., January 15, 2006; 66(2): 1208 - 1217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. I. Garbe, B. Vermeer, J. Gamrekelashvili, R. v. Wasielewski, F. R. Greten, A. M. Westendorf, J. Buer, R. M. Schmid, M. P. Manns, F. Korangy, et al. Genetically Induced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Is Highly Immunogenic and Causes Spontaneous Tumor-Specific Immune Responses Cancer Res., January 1, 2006; 66(1): 508 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N T van Heek, S J Clayton, P D J Sturm, J Walker, D J Gouma, L A Noorduyn, G J A Offerhaus, and J C Fox Comparison of the novel quantitative ARMS assay and an enriched PCR-ASO assay for K-ras mutations with conventional cytology on endobiliary brush cytology from 312 consecutive extrahepatic biliary stenoses J. Clin. Pathol., December 1, 2005; 58(12): 1315 - 1320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Qian, J. Niu, M. Li, P. J. Chiao, and M.-S. Tsao In vitro Modeling of Human Pancreatic Duct Epithelial Cell Transformation Defines Gene Expression Changes Induced by K-ras Oncogenic Activation in Pancreatic Carcinogenesis Cancer Res., June 15, 2005; 65(12): 5045 - 5053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Chen, S. Pan, T. A. Brentnall, and R. Aebersold Proteomic Profiling of Pancreatic Cancer for Biomarker Discovery Mol. Cell. Proteomics, April 1, 2005; 4(4): 523 - 533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Sclabas, S. Fujioka, C. Schmidt, Z. Li, W. A.I. Frederick, W. Yang, K. Yokoi, D. B. Evans, J. L. Abbruzzese, K. R. Hess, et al. Overexpression of Tropomysin-Related Kinase B in Metastatic Human Pancreatic Cancer Cells Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2005; 11(2): 440 - 449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Dowen, T. Crnogorac-Jurcevic, R. Gangeswaran, M. Hansen, J. J. Eloranta, V. Bhakta, T. A. Brentnall, J. Luttges, G. Kloppel, and N. R. Lemoine Expression of S100P and Its Novel Binding Partner S100PBPR in Early Pancreatic Cancer Am. J. Pathol., January 1, 2005; 166(1): 81 - 92. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Al-Aynati, N. Radulovich, J. Ho, and M.-S. Tsao Overexpression of G1-S Cyclins and Cyclin-Dependent Kinases during Multistage Human Pancreatic Duct Cell Carcinogenesis Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2004; 10(19): 6598 - 6605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Agbunag and D. Bar-Sagi Oncogenic K-ras Drives Cell Cycle Progression and Phenotypic Conversion of Primary Pancreatic Duct Epithelial Cells Cancer Res., August 15, 2004; 64(16): 5659 - 5663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. G. Skinner, D. S. Michaud, E. L. Giovannucci, E. B. Rimm, M. J. Stampfer, W. C. Willett, G. A. Colditz, and C. S. Fuchs A Prospective Study of Folate Intake and the Risk of Pancreatic Cancer in Men and Women Am. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2004; 160(3): 248 - 258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Takahashi, T. Oda, T. Hasebe, Y. Aoyagi, T. Kinoshita, M. Konishi, T. Nakagohri, K. Inoue, S. Takahashi, H. Kawahira, et al. Biologically Different Subgroups of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the Pancreas: Dpc4 Status According to the Ratio of Intraductal Carcinoma Components Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2004; 10(11): 3772 - 3779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Niu, Z. Li, B. Peng, and P. J. Chiao Identification of an Autoregulatory Feedback Pathway Involving Interleukin-1{alpha} in Induction of Constitutive NF-{kappa}B Activation in Pancreatic Cancer Cells J. Biol. Chem., April 16, 2004; 279(16): 16452 - 16462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Al-Aynati, N. Radulovich, R. H. Riddell, and M.-S. Tsao Epithelial-Cadherin and {beta}-Catenin Expression Changes in Pancreatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2004; 10(4): 1235 - 1240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. T. Nawrocki, B. Sweeney-Gotsch, R. Takamori, and D. J. McConkey The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib enhances the activity of docetaxel in orthotopic human pancreatic tumor xenografts Mol. Cancer Ther., January 1, 2004; 3(1): 59 - 70. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Parker, S. R. Florell, A. Alexander, J. A. DiSario, P. J. Shami, and S. A. Leachman Pancreatic Carcinoma Surveillance in Patients With Familial Melanoma Arch Dermatol, August 1, 2003; 139(8): 1019 - 1025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. T. Nawrocki, C. J. Bruns, M. T. Harbison, R. J. Bold, B. S. Gotsch, J. L. Abbruzzese, P. Elliott, J. Adams, and D. J. McConkey Effects of the Proteasome Inhibitor PS-341 on Apoptosis and Angiogenesis in Orthotopic Human Pancreatic Tumor Xenografts Mol. Cancer Ther., December 1, 2002; 1(14): 1243 - 1253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |