Clinical Cancer Research CR Balducci AACR Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alvarez, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Curiel, D. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alvarez, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Curiel, D. T.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 6, 3081-3087, August 2000
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research


Clinical Trials

A Cancer Gene Therapy Approach Utilizing an Anti-erbB-2 Single-Chain Antibody-encoding Adenovirus (AD21): A Phase I Trial1

Ronald D. Alvarez2, Mack N. Barnes, Jesus Gomez-Navarro, Minghui Wang, Theresa V. Strong, Waleed Arafat, Ramin B. Arani, Martin R. Johnson, Bruce L. Roberts, Gene P. Siegal and David T. Curiel

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology [R. D. A., M. N. B.], The Gene Therapy Center [J. G-N., M. W., T. V. S., W. A., D. T. C.], Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology [M. R. J.], The Biostatistics Unit [R. B. A.], Genzyme Corporation [B. L. R.], and Departments of Pathology, Cell Biology, and Surgery [G. P. S.], The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham Alabama 35233-7333


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The purpose of this Phase I study was to determine the feasibility of using an anti-erbB-2-encoding adenovirus (Ad21) to treat erbB-2-overexpressing ovarian cancer. Recurrent ovarian cancer patients were treated i.p. with Ad21 in dosages ranging from 1 x 109 to 1 x 1011 pfu. Patients were monitored after treatment for evidence of clinical toxicity and efficacy. Peritoneal aspirates and serum samples were obtained to assess for evidence of gene transfer/expression, for generation of wild-type vector, and antiadenoviral humoral response. Fifteen patients were treated per study specifications. Treatment-specific grade 1/2 fever was ex-perienced by 9 of 15 (60%) patients. Other transient grade 1/2 constitutional, pain, and gastrointestinal symptoms were also experienced. No dose-limiting vector-related toxicity was experienced. Of 13 patients evaluable for response, 5 (38%) had stable disease and 8 (61%) had evidence of progressive disease. One patient with nonmeasurable disease normalized her CA125 at the 8-week evaluation, and one patient with nonmeasurable disease remained without clinical evidence of disease for 6 months after treatment. PCR analysis of peritoneal aspirates demonstrated the presence of Ad21 in 84.6%, 84.6%, and 61.6% of evaluable specimens at days 2, 14, and 56 after treatment, respectively. No wild-type virus was detected. Reverse transcription-PCR analysis demonstrated expression of the anti-erbB-2 sFv-encoding gene in 10 of 14 evaluable patients at day 2. Five of six evaluable patients had an increase in antiadenovirus antibody titer. This study suggests that adenoviral-mediated gene therapy using an anti-erbB-2-directed intrabody is feasible in the context of human ovarian cancer.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Several gene therapy approaches have been proposed for patients with advanced ovarian cancer (1 , 2) . Mutation compensation is one such approach whereby ovarian cancer cells are genetically manipulated to affect the molecular processes contributing to the malignant phenotype. In this regard, investigators have restored or targeted genes controlling cellular proliferation (i.e., tumor suppressor genes, growth factor-encoding oncogenes, regulators of apoptosis, and other cell cycle control genes) as a means to achieve favorable antitumor effects (2) .

Mutation compensation gene therapy approaches have been augmented by recent advances that have allowed for the construction of genes engineered to express intracellular antibodies, commonly known as intrabodies (3 , 4) . These intrabodies generally consist of the light chain variable region of an antibody connected by a small interchain linker to its complimentary heavy chain variable region and are termed sFvs3 Gene therapy approaches using sFv-encoding vectors have been successfully used to alter the activity of specific intracellular proteins in a variety of cell types (4 , 5) . In the context of cancer, modification of subcellular processes involved specifically in the malignant transformation of the target tumor cell is but one of several potential advantages of such an approach.

We have endeavored to use this intrabody strategy to target the erbB-2 protein in ovarian cancer. Several lines of evidence suggest that aberrant expression of the erbB-2 gene (which encodes for a transmembrane receptor with homology to the family of epithelial growth factor receptors) may play an important role in neoplastic transformation and progression (6, 7, 8) . It has been demonstrated that erbB-2 is amplified or overexpressed in a variety of tumors, including ovarian carcinoma (9) . Importantly, a direct correlation has been noted between overexpression of erbB-2 and aggressive tumor behavior and poor overall survival in patients with ovarian cancer (9) . Our preclinical studies using such an intrabody approach to target erbB-2-overexpressing ovarian cancer cells have demonstrated that an erbB-2 sFv could be expressed by an adenoviral-delivered gene and could be localized to the endoplasmic reticulum (10) . This feat resulted in down-regulation of erbB-2 expression, induction of apoptosis, and cytotoxicity in both established and primary ovarian cancer cell lines (10, 11, 12, 13) . Subsequent in vivo studies using an anti-erbB-2-encoding adenovirus (Ad21) demonstrated antitumor activity and prolongation of survival in erbB-2-overexpressing ovarian cancer animal models (14) .

The current study reports our initial efforts to translate this erbB-2-directed intrabody technology into a novel strategy for the treatment of erbB-2-overexpressing human cancers. In addition to elucidating the feasibility of a new paradigm for cancer gene therapy, this study also reports our findings regarding the safety profile and gene transfer efficacy associated with i.p. administration of an anti-erbB-2 sFv-encoding adenovirus.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Construction and Validation of AD21.
A replication incompetent E1, E3-deleted adenovirus (AD21) was derived containing a gene construct encoding an endoplasmic reticulum localizing single-chain immunoglobulin (sFv) directed against human erbB-2 (15) . The anti-erbB-2 sFv plasmid e23scFv was initially obtained from Oncologix (formerly of Gaithersburg, MD) and used for the derivation of subsequent constructs. Clinical lots of AD21 were prepared by Genzyme, Inc. (Cambridge, MA); all regulatory approvals (Office of Recombinant DNA, Food and Drug Administration Investigational New Drug, Institutional Review Board, Institutional Biosafety Committee) were obtained prior to clinical utilization.

Design of Phase I Trial.
A Phase I trial was developed to achieve the aforementioned study goals (16) . Eligible patients included those with recurrent intra-abdominal ovarian or extraovarian cancer who had failed standard debulking and chemotherapy treatment(s). Adequate organ function and performance status were required. Tumor tissue must have had immunohistochemical evidence of erbB-2 overexpression. Ten of the 15 study patients had their tumor samples immunohistochemically analyzed by one of the co-authors (G. P. S.). A composite immunoreactivity score was assigned by adding the scores based on the proportion of immunoreactive cells and the intensity of immunoreactivity (proportion score: 0 = no cells immunoreactive, 1 = 1 of 100 cells immunoreactive, 2 = 1 of 10 cells immunoreactive, 3 = 1 of 3 cells immunoreactive, 4 = 2 of 3 cells immunoreactive, 5 = all cells immunoreactive; intensity score: 0 = no cells immunoreactive, 1 = minimally immunoreactive, 2 = weakly immunoreactive, 3 = moderately immunoreactive, 4 = strongly immunoreactive). Tissue samples were designated as weakly erbB-2 positive when a composite proportion and intensity score was 4–5, moderately erbB-2 positive when a composite proportion and intensity score was 6–7, or strongly erbB-2 positive when a composite proportion and intensity score was 8–9. Five patients had their tumor samples tested by commercially available tests performed at laboratory facilities from referral institutions and were designated as not specified.

Patients were administered a single dose of Ad21 i.p. via a Tenchkoff catheter. The dose of Ad21 was escalated in cohorts of at least three patients beginning at 1 x 109 pfu rising to 1 x 1011 pfu. Patients were monitored at specified intervals for 8 weeks after treatment for evidence of clinical toxicity using standard Phase I methodology. Serum samples were simultaneously obtained at the time of clinical evaluations; the serum samples were analyzed for evidence of hematological, biochemical, or coagulation abnormalities. Clinical efficacy was monitored by serial physical examination and computed tomography scans in all evaluable patients.

Determination of Gene Delivery.
Peritoneal aspirates of patients were obtained at specific time points to assess for evidence of transgene expression. Following centrifugation at 1000 rpm for 5 min, concentrated cell pellets were obtained and stored at 80°C. Genomic DNA was isolated from the cell pellet using a QIAamp Tissue Kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA). Specifically, the cell pellet from spun ascites was lysed by proteinase K (2.5 mg/ml) and incubated at 70°C for 10 min. Following a series of washes, DNA was eluted and resuspended in 10 mM Tris-HCl and 1 mM EDTA (pH 8.0). Six microliters of each sample were subjected to PCR analysis with primers specific for the E4 region of the virus (forward primer: TGTGACTGATTGAGCGGTG; reverse primer: CCCATTTAACACGCCATGCA) of the Ad5 vector, the E1 region (forward primer: ATTACCGAAGAAATGGCCGC; reverse primer: CCCATTTAACACGCCATGCA) of the Ad5 vector, and the anti-erbB-2 sFv gene e23 (forward primer: CATGCACTGGTATCAGCAGA; reverse primer: CATCGAAGTACCAGTCCGTA). PCR was performed for 60 cycles at 94°C for 30 s, 54°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s. Amplification of infected cells by these primers resulted in a fragment of 714 bp for E4, 538 bp for e23, and 1066 bp for E1, respectively, detected by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, followed by staining with ethidium bromide.

Determination of Transgene Expression.
Total RNA was also isolated from the stored cell pellets and purified using a Qiagen RNA kit (Qiagen, Santa Clarita, CA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Specimens were analyzed for transgene expression using real-time quantitative RT-PCR technology. Oligonucleotide primers were designed as follows. The forward primer (AAACCTTGGATTTATACCAC ATCCA), reverse primer (GAAGAATGGTGATGGGATTTC), and 6-FAM- labeled probe (CCTGGCTTCTGGAGTCCCTGCTCG-TAMRA) to amplify the e23 gene were designed by the Primer Express 1.0 software (Perkin-Elmer Corp., Foster City, CA) following the recommendations of the manufacturer. The forward primer (GAAGGTGAAGGTCGGAGTC), reverse primer (GAAGATGGTGATGGGATTTC), and fluorogenic JOE-labeled probe (CAAGCT TCCCGTTCTCAGCC) to amplify the GAPDH housekeeping gene were derived from a control reagent kit (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).

In vitro transcription and purification of e23 cRNA was then performed. Specifically, pcDNA 3.0 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) containing the complete e23 cDNA was used as a template in a PCR reaction. A forward primer (CACTGCTTACTGGCTTATCG) and a reverse primer (TGATCAGCGAGCTCTAGC) was used to amplify 895 bp of the e23 cDNA fragment containing 788 bp of the complete e23 cDNA and the T7 promoter. This fragment was used as a template for an in vitro RNA transcription reaction (Ambion, Austin, TX) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The resulting cRNA was confirmed and purified from a 5% acrylamide/8 M urea gel, quantified by spectroscopy at A260, and then converted to the number of copies using the molecular weight of the e23 cRNA.

One-step RT-PCR was then performed on an ABI PRISM 7700 Sequence Detector. With an optimized concentration of primers and probe, GAPDH, the endogenous control, was amplified to generate a standard curve of a sequence using a known amount of human RNA (25, 5, 1, and 0.1 ng of total RNA). The test samples were amplified in a different set of reactions using the e23 primers and probe. Linear extrapolation of the cycle threshold values was derived using the equation to the line obtained from the e23 standard curve. These values were then divided by the relative amounts of GAPDH quantitated by linear extrapolation.

Known amounts of e23 cRNA molecules (1 x 106, 1 x 104 , 1 x 102, and 10 copies) were used to generate an absolute standard curve. The copy number of e23 mRNA was then determined by linear extrapolation of the cycle threshold values using the equation to the line obtained from the absolute e23 standard curve. These values were then divided by the relative amounts of GAPDH. The components of one-step RT-PCR were designed to result in a 25-µl final volume for each reaction: TaqMan Buffer (1X); MgCl2 (3.5 mM); 2% glycerol, dATP, dGTP, and dCTP (300 µM/each); dUTP (600 µM); forward primer (200 nM); reverse primer (200 nM); probe (200 nM); GAPDH (100 nM); Ampli Taq Gold (0.625 unit); MuLV (6.25 units); and RNase Inhibitor (5 units). All PCR reactions were performed in optical reaction tubes (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) designed for the ABI PRISM 7700 Sequence Detector System. Thermal cycling conditions were subjected to 30 min at 48°C, followed by 10 min at 95°C and then 40 cycles of 15 s at 95°C and 1 min at 60°C.

Determination of Humoral Response to Vector.
An ELISA was used to determine titers of antiadenoviral antibodies in serum samples collected from treated ovarian cancer patients. Polystyrene 96-well plates (Costar, Fisher, Pittsburgh, PA) were coated with 100 µl of PBS containing Ad5CMVluc at 10 ng, 30 ng, 50 ng, 100 ng, 300 ng, or 500 ng for overnight incubation at 4°C. Plates were then blocked with 100 µl of 1% BSA (fraction 5; FisherBiotech) in 10 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl (pH 7.5; TBS) for 1 h at 25°C. After washing three times with TBS, ascites diluted in PBS (1:10, 1:100, and 1:1000) were added to triplicate wells (100 µl/cell) and incubated for 2 h at room temperature. Plates were washed three times with TBS, and alkaline phosphatase-conjugated secondary antibodies were added and incubated overnight at 4°C. Goat antihuman IgG (Jackson Laboratories, West Grove, PA) was used for determining the total antiadenoviral titers. After washing three times with TBS, substrate [3 mM p-nitrophenyl phosphate, 0.5 mM MgCl2 and 10 mM diethanolamine (pH 9.5)] was added and color was allowed to develop at room temperature for ~30 min. Absorbance at 405 nm was measured in a 96-well plate reader (Molecular Devices, Menlo Park, CA), and data were analyzed by the SOFTmax software package (Emax Molecular Devices, Menlo Park CA).


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Patient Characteristics.
Between April and October of 1998, 15 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer were enrolled in the study. Demographics of the patients treated with Ad21 are listed in Table 1Citation . Generally, treated patients had been initially diagnosed with advanced stage ovarian cancer, had recurred after debulking surgery and after a number of conventional chemotherapy regimens (including paclitaxel and cisplatinum/carboplatinum). The majority of patients had disease measuring in excess of 2 cm at the time of Ad21 treatment.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Patient demographics

 
Treatment Dosages.
Patients were treated with a single dose of Ad21 via a percutaneous Tenckhoff catheter. Dosages and patient cohorts are specified in Table 2Citation . Due to limitations in Ad21 vector availability, the last two patients accrued to the study were treated at the third cohort dose level.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Ad21 dosing cohorts

 
Toxicity Profile.
In general, i.p. delivery of a single dose of Ad21 was well tolerated (Table 3)Citation . Treatment-specific grade 1/2 fever was experienced by 9 of 15 (60%) treated patients. Fever symptoms were transient, lasting <48 h, and were easily ameliorated by antipyretics. Various other grade 1/2 constitutional symptoms, pain, and gastrointestinal symptoms were also experienced but were, likewise, transient and easily ameliorated. Most of these latter symptoms could not be directly attributed to Ad21 treatment, and, in many instances, were thought to be disease related. One patient with a history of deep vein thrombosis and an indwelling catheter developed thrombosis of the subclavian vein; she responded to appropriate anticoagulation therapy. Another patient developed grade 3 dyspnea 6–7 weeks after treatment due to progression in her disease status; evaluation demonstrated a large left pleural effusion, and the patient responded well to thoracentesis. No dose-limiting vector-related clinical toxicity was experienced. Three patients experienced Teckhoff catheter-associated infections.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3 Side effects noted in patients treated i.p. with Ad21

 
There were no vector-related hematological, coagulation, or electrolyte abnormalities noted in the Ad21-treated patients. Two patients were on coumadin; one, as noted above, was diagnosed after Ad21 treatment with a subclavian vein thrombosis, and one had a mechanical heart valve and had been on coumadin since her cardiac surgery. Both patients had appropriate elevations of their prothrombin time. In addition, no hepatic dysfunction was experienced.

Clinical Activity.
Of 13 patients evaluable for response, 5 (38%) had stable disease and 8 (61%) had evidence of progressive disease. One patient with nonmeasurable disease normalized her CA125 at the 8-week evaluation point; although she remained without clinical evidence of disease, her CA125 subsequently rose 1 month later and she was treated with additional chemotherapy. Another patient with nonmeasurable disease remained without clinical evidence of disease progression for 6 months after treatment. To date, eight patients have died subsequent to the evaluation period due to progressive disease.

Corroborative Laboratory Results.
PCR analysis of evaluable ascites samples, as shown in Fig. 1Citation and Table 4Citation , demonstrates the presence of adenoviral vector and expression of the anti-erbB-2 sFv-encoding gene in most patients 2 days after i.p. administration and in many patients up to 56 days after treatment. Specifically, PCR analysis of peritoneal aspirates demonstrated the presence of Ad21 in 84.6%, 84.6%, and 61.6% of evaluable specimens at days 2, 14, and 56 after treatment, respectively. In addition, these analyses demonstrated no evidence suggesting the generation of wild-type virus.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. DNA fragment sizes of 714 bp, 538 bp, and 1066 bp correspond to primers for E4 DNA (adenoviral vector), e23 DNA (anti-erbB-2 sFv), and E1 DNA (wild-type virus).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4 Detection of adenoviral vector (E4), anti-erbB-2 sFv (e23), and wild-type adenovirus (E1)

 
RT-PCR analysis of cell pellets from the ascites samples, as shown in Table 5Citation , demonstrated expression of the anti-erbB-2 sFv-encoding gene in 10 of 14 evaluable patients at day 2. In most patients gene expression peaked at day 2 and abated by day 56. An increase in transgene expression seemed to occur when the dosage of Ad21 exceeded 1.0 x 1010 pfu.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 5 Expression of anti-erbB-2 sFv (e23) in cell pellet of Ad21-infected ascites samples

 
All study patients had detectable serum antibodies to adenovirus prior to Ad21 treatment. Serial serum samples were obtained up to day 56 in six patients; Ad21 dose ranged from 1.0 x 109 to 3.3 x 1010 in these patients. All but one of the six patients had an increase in titer of antiadenovirus antibody (Fig. 2)Citation . No hypersensitivity reactions were noted.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. Generation of antiadenoviral humoral response to Ad21 treatment. Serum anti-Ad5 neutralizing antibody levels as a function of time after administration of the Ad21 gene transfer vector by i.p. route. Serum levels of anti-Ad5-neutralizing antibodies were quantified before therapy and at two other time points, as indicated after vector administration. Each symbol represents a different individual. The dose of vector (pfu) is indicated for each individual.

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The current study reports our initial efforts to translate an erbB-2-directed intrabody technology into a novel gene therapy strategy for the treatment of human ovarian cancer. Although clinical trials using intrabodies have been proposed for patients with HIV disease (17) , this represents the first reported clinical application of this technology in the context of human disease.4 Several important insights may be garnered from our investigation. First, it seems that this approach is clinically well tolerated. Although patients frequently experienced fever and constitutional symptoms, these symptoms were easily ameliorated and were similar to those noted in patients treated i.p. with various other gene therapy vectors (18) . Importantly, no Ad21-specific dose-limiting toxicity was experienced with the dosages currently investigated. This could potentially be the result of specificity of Ad21-induced cytotoxic effects occurring exclusively within erbB-2-overexpressing tumor cells. This hypothesis is supported by preclinical studies of ours that demonstrated no cytotoxic effect of Ad21 in non-erbB-2-overexpressing cells (11 , 12) . Alternatively, the limited side effects could be due to a differential in toxicity based on vector effects in a specific body compartment. Clinical trials using various viral vectors have demonstrated poor tolerance or intense inflammatory reactions when these vectors are administered systemically or into other body cavities, particularly at adenoviral dosages exceeding 1012 pfu (20, 21, 22, 23, 24) . However, there is a growing body of clinical evidence from this study and other gene therapy trials using i.p.-delivered adenoviral vectors that support the notion that the peritoneal cavity may be more tolerant of these vectors (27) . In addition, spontaneous generation of wild-type replicative competent adenovirus was not observed. This observation may have also contributed to the limited toxicity observed.

A key goal of this study was to determine the use of adenoviral vectors for gene therapy application in the context of carcinoma of the ovary. In this regard, we were able to convincingly demonstrate vector-mediated transfer and expression within cellular material derived from treated patients. Two findings in these studies indicated that this had been achieved; first, a clear dose-response relationship was noted with respect to administered Ad21 and detected transgene levels. Second, the temporal pattern of gene expression was consistent with that predicated by our preclinical studies in human-derived material (10) . These important observations, thus, establish the basic use of adenoviral vectors in this delivery context. Our preclinical studies strongly correlated the level of anti-erbB-2 protein expression with antitumor effect in both established and primary ovarian cancer cell lines (14) . However, access to the antibody used in these preclinical studies was not available for analyzing the clinical specimens obtained from patients in the current study. For our future trials, we have incorporated a myc tag into the transgene expression cassette that would facilitate determination of its expression levels by immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry.

On the other hand, assay-related limitations in the current study precluded determining the efficiency with which gene transfer had occurred. Furthermore, the precise distribution of gene transfer to tumor versus nontumor elements of ascites cellular components was not delineated in this limited study. Such assay limits have restricted the derivation of this key information in many human gene therapy trials endeavored heretofore. To address this issue, we have developed a novel means of processing peritoneal aspirates, which we intend to incorporate into future trials, allowing to isolate primary ovarian cancer cells by affinity purification. To this end, magnetic beads coated with an antibody that specifically recognizes the pancarcinomatous antigen TAG-72 is added to the unfractionated cell suspension. To isolate the immunocomplex formed by the antibody and the TAG-72-expressing tumor cells, the magnetic beads are captured with a magnetic particle concentrator. Thus, we are now able to evaluate the effect of our molecular interventions in a better-defined and more relevant cellular substrate.

In addition, we have endeavored to create a noninvasive, gene-based imaging system, which is being configured in the next generation of trials (28) . This system allows for expression of a receptor-encoding gene construct in addition to a therapeutic gene construct in transduced cells. Thus, transduced tumor implants as well as other transduced nontumor tissues would be amenable to nuclear imaging using commercially approved radiolabeled peptides that would bind to the encoded receptor localized on the cell surface. It is anticipated that such systems will be of fundamental importance to gaining vector efficiency and specificity information in the context of human trials and to correlating gene transfer with clinical outcome.

The documentation of in vivo gene transfer establishes a key feasibility with respect to realizing gene therapy for carcinoma of the ovary. In this regard, basic vector inefficiencies have been recognized to be a fundamental limit in a variety of other cancer gene therapy contexts (29) . A key consideration with respect to the use of the adenoviral vector for in situ gene transfer is the level of the adenoviral receptor CAR on target human cells. Our recent studies have established that ovarian cancer cells are profoundly deficient in this receptor in vitro and exhibit a relative resistance to adenoviral vectors on this basis; tumors derived from patients are similarly minimally CAR immunoreactive (30) . Although we did not specifically analyze peritoneal cellular samples derived from patients in the current trial for CAR expression, this aspect of ovarian cancer pathobiology clearly represents a valid limit to realizing the full potential of any current adenoviral-mediated gene therapy approach and future trials using unmodified adenoviral vector systems should incorporate studies of tumor CAR expression. To further address this issue, we have designed an advanced generation of adenoviral vectors, which are genetically modified to accomplish CAR-independent gene transfer (31) . Such vectors exhibit substantially enhanced infection efficiencies for ovarian cancer tumor targets. Clearly, inclusion of these vector design improvements would be predicated to enhance to adenoviral-mediated gene transfer in future trials.

As noted, none of the patients treated in this study exhibited a dramatic clinical benefit. This finding was not unexpected and reflects, in part, the basic gene delivery shortcomings inherent in a Phase I study. Furthermore, in this regard, mutation compensation strategies require gene transfer into a large proportion of target tumor cells. Thus, our anti-erbB-2 intrabody approach, in its present design, would be expected to exhibit effects exclusively in vector-infected tumor cells. The recognition of this requirement for near-quantitative modification of tumor cells has led to the exploration of genetic interventions whereby antitumor effects may be gained over-and-above those achieved directly via tumor cell modification. In this regard, strategies designed to achieve such "bystander effects" offer a theoretical means to circumvent such requirements for extremely high tumor cell transduction (32, 33, 34) . To this end, we have sought to modify the intrabody approach toward the goal of achieving such a bystander effect. Specifically, the anti-erbB-2 sFv has been engineered to render it a secreted protein subsequent to biosynthesis. We have shown that such secreted sFvs can achieve direct antitumor effects highly analogous to anti-erbB-2 monoclonal antibodies. On this basis, in situ tumor transduction allows secretion of the anti-erbB-2 sFv with the achievement of high local concentrations of this potent antitumor agent. Such an approach combines the recognized efficiency of an anti-erbB-2 monoclonal antibody-based approach with the delivery advantages attributed to gene-based methods. Thus, our aforementioned findings defining the clinical feasibility of intrabody-based gene knockout might soon be extended by these ongoing efforts to fully realize the clinical use of genetically abrogating the erbB-2 oncogene and other tumor relevant targets. Additional Phase I and Phase II trials in development will further clarify the potential efficacy of this intrabody approach in patients with erbB-2-overexpressing ovarian cancer.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Connie Weldon for secretarial support.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported by NIH Grants 1R21CA69343-02, R01CA68245, and R01CA72532; and the Cancer Treatment Research Foundation. Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Room 538 OHB, 618 South 20th Street, Birmingham, AL 35233-7333. Phone: (205) 934-4986; Fax: (205) 975-6174; E-mail: rdalvarez{at}aol.com Back

3 The abbreviations used are: sFv, single-chain antibody; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; RT-PCR, reverse transcription-PCR; TBS, Tris-buffered saline; CAR, coxsackie and adenoviral receptor; pfu, plaque-forming unit. Back

4 RAC Protocol List, http: //www.nih.gov/od/oba/protocol.pdf. Back

Received 2/23/00; revised 4/17/00; accepted 5/ 4/00.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Barnes M. N., Deshane J. S., Rosenfield M., Siegal G. P., Curiel D. T., Alvarez R. D. Gene therapy and ovarian cancer: a review. Obstet. Gynecol., 89: 145-155, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Gomez-Navarro J., Siegal G. P., Alvarez R. D., Curiel D. T. Gene therapy: ovarian carcinoma as the paradigm. Am. J. Clin. Pathol., 109: 444-467, 1998.[Medline]
  3. Wels W., Moritz D., Schmidt M., Jeschke M., Hynes N. E., Groner B. Biotechnological and gene therapeutic strategies in cancer treatment. Gene, 159: 73-80, 1995.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Jones S. D., Marasco W. A. Antibodies for targeted gene therapy: extracellular gene targeting and intracellular expression. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev., 31: 153-170, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Pelegrin M., Marin M., Noel D., Piechaczyk M. Genetically engineered antibodies in gene transfer and gene therapy. Hum. Gene Ther., 9: 2165-2175, 1998.[Medline]
  6. Beerli R. R., Wels W., Hynes N. E. Intracellular expression of single chain antibodies reverts ErbB-2 transformation. J. Biol. Chem., 269: 23931-23936, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Hudziak R. M., Schlessinger J., Ulrich A. Increased expression of the putative growth factor receptor p185HER2 causes transformation and tumorigenesis of NIH 3T3 cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 84: 7159-7163, 1987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Muller W. J., Sinn E., Pattengale P. K., Wallace R., Leder P. Single-step induction of mammary adenocarcinoma in transgenic mice bearing the activated c-neu oncogene. Cell, 54: 105-115, 1988.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Slamon D. J., Godolphin W., Jones L. A., Holt J. A., Wong S. G., Keith D. E., Levin W. J., Stuart S. G., Udove J., Ullrich A., Press M. Studies of the HER-2/neu proto-oncogene in human breast and ovarian cancer. Science (Washington DC), 244: 707-712, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Deshane J., Loechel F., Conry R. M., Siegal G. P., King C. R., Curiel D. T. Intracellular single-chain antibody directed against erbB2 down-regulates cell surface erbB2 and exhibits a selective anti-proliferative effect in erbB2 overexpressing cancer cell lines. Gene Ther., 1: 332-337, 1994.[Medline]
  11. Deshane J., Siegal G. P., Alvarez R. D., Wang M., Feng M., Cabrera G., Kay M., Curiel D. T. Targeted tumor cell killing via an intracellular antibody against erbB-2. J. Clin. Invest., 96: 2980-2989, 1995.
  12. Deshane J., Cabrera G., Grim J. E., Siegal G. P., Pike J., Alvarez R. D., Curiel D. T. Targeted eradication of ovarian cancer mediated by intracellular expression of anti-erbB-2 single-chain antibody. Gynecol. Oncol., 59: 8-14, 1995.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Deshane J., Grim J., Loechel S., Siegal G. P., Alvarez R. D., Curiel D. T. Intracellular antibody directed against erbB-2 mediates targeted tumor cell eradication by apoptosis. Cancer Gene Ther., 3: 89-98, 1996.[Medline]
  14. Deshane J., Siegal G. P., Wang M., Wright M., Bucy R. P., Alvarez R. D., Curiel D. T. Transductional efficacy and safety of an intraperitoneally delivered adenovirus encoding an anti-erbB-2 intracellular single-chain antibody for ovarian cancer gene therapy. Gynecol. Oncol., 64: 378-385, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Grim J., Deshane J., Feng M., Lieber A., Kay M., Curiel D. T. erbB-2 knockout employing an intracellular single-chain antibody (sFv) accomplishes specific toxicity in erbB-2-expressing lung cancer cells. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., 15: 348-354, 1996.[Abstract]
  16. Alvarez R. D., Curiel D. T. A phase I study of recombinant adenovirus vector-mediated delivery of an anti-erbB-2 single-chain (sFv) antibody gene for previously treated ovarian and extraovarian cancer patients. Hum. Gene Ther., 8: 229-242, 1997.[Medline]
  17. Marasco, W. A., Chen, S., Richardson, J. H., Ramstedt, U., and Jones, S. D. Intracellular antibodies against HIV-1 envelope protein for AIDS gene therapy. Hum. Gene Ther., 20: 9: 1627–1642, 1998.
  18. Tait D. L., Obermiller P. S., Redlin-Frazier S., Jensen R. A., Welcsh P., Dann J., King M., Johnson D. H., Holt J. T. A phase I trial of retroviral BRCA1sv gene therapy in ovarian cancer. Clin. Cancer Res., 3: 1959-1968, 1997.[Abstract]
  19. Link, C. J., Eldeman, M., Tennant, L., Levy, J., Moorman, D. W., and Seregina, T. LTKOSN.1 murine vector producer cell (VPC) for the in vivo delivery of the herpes simplex thymidine kinase (HSVtk) gene for ovarian cancer (Abstract). Am. Soc. Gene Ther., 1999.
  20. Knowles M. R., Hohneker K. W., Zhou Z., Olsen J. C., Noah T. L., Hu P. C., Leigh M. W., Engelhardt J. F., Edwards L. J., Jones K. R., Grossman M., Wilson J. M., Johnson L. G., Boucher R. C. A controlled study of adenoviral-vector-mediated gene transfer in the nasal epithelium of patients with cystic fibrosis. N. Engl. J. Med., 333: 823-831, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Porteous D. J., Dorin J. R., McLachlan G., Davidson-Smith H., Davidson H., Stevenson B. J., Carothers A. D., Wallace W. A., Moralee S., Hoenes C., Kallmeyer G., Michaelis U., Naujoks K., Ho L. P., Samways J. M., Imrie M., Greening A. P., Innes J. A. Evidence for safety and efficacy of DOTAP cationic liposome mediated CFTR gene transfer to the nasal epithelium of patients with cystic fibrosis. Gene Ther., 4: 210-218, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Sterman D. H., Treat J., Litzky L. A., Amin K. M., Coonrod L., Molnar-Kimber K., Recio A., Knox L., Wilson J. M., Albelda S. M., Kaiser L. R. Adenovirus-mediated herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase/ganciclovir gene therapy in patients with localized malignancy: results of a phase I clinical trial in malignant mesothelioma. Hum. Gene Ther., 9: 1083-1092, 1998.[Medline]
  23. Harvey B. G., Hackett N. R., El Sawy T., Rosengart T. K., Hirschowitz E. A., Lieberman M. D., Lesser M. L., Crystal R. G. Variability of human systemic humoral immune responses to adenovirus gene transfer vectors administered to different organs. J. Virol., 73: 6729-6742, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Nunes F. A., Furth E. E., Wilson J. M., Raper S. E. Gene transfer into the liver of nonhuman primates with E1-deleted recombinant adenoviral vectors: safety of readministration. Hum. Gene Ther., 10: 2515-2526, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Ueno, N. T., Hung, M. C., Weiden, P., Wolf, J. K., Xia, W., Zhang, S., Daifuku, R., Kilbourn, R. G., Willey, J. S., Warner, D. L., Payne, J. Y., Nandagiri, R., Aldridge, R., Carey, M., Lincoln, S. T., Aboulafia, D., De Jager, R. L., Tucker, S., Putnam, J. B., Sneige, N., Katz, R. L., Spohn, W. H., Bast, R. C., Holmes, F. A., Ibrahim, N. K., Murray, J. L., Theriault, R. L., Rahman, Z. U., Valero, V., Kudelka, A. P., Kavanagh., J., Freedman, R. S., Gerhenson, D. M., Bevers, M. W., Huang, L., Lopez-Berestein, L. G., and Hortobagyi, G. N. Phase I trial of E1A gene therapy in patients with advanced breast and ovarian cancers (Abstract). Am. Soc. Gene Ther., 1998.
  26. Buller R. E., Pegrum M., Runnebaum I., et al A phase I study of gene therapy with recombinant intraperitoneal p53 in recurrent ovarian cancer. Cancer Gene Ther., 5: S25 1998.
  27. Buller R. E., Pegram M., Runnebaum I., Horowitz J. A., Buekers T. E., Salko T. P., Rybak M. E., Shahin M. S., Kreienberg R., Karlan B., Slamon D. A phase I/II trial of recombinant adenoviral human p53 (SCH58500) intraperitoneal (ip) gene therapy in recurent ovarian cancer. Gynecol. Oncol., 72: 452 1999.
  28. Rogers B. E., McLean S. F., Kirkman R. L., Della Manna D., Bright S. J., Olsen C. C., Myracle A. D., Mayo M. S., Curiel D. T., Buchsbaumm D. J. In vivo localization of [(111)In]-DTPA-D-Phe1-octreotide to human ovarian tumor xenografts induced to express the somatostatin receptor subtype 2 using an adenoviral vector. Clin. Cancer Res., 5: 383-393, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Gomez-Navarro J., Curiel D. T., Douglas J. T. Gene therapy for cancer. Eur. J. Cancer, 35: 867-885, 1999.
  30. Khuu H., Conner M., Vanderkwaark T., Shultz J., Gomez-Navarro J., Alvarez R. D., Curiel D. T., Siegal G. P. Detection of Coxsackie-adenovirus receptor (CAR) immunoreactivity in ovarian tumors of epithelial derivation. Appl. Immunohistochem. Mol. Morphol., 7: 266-270, 1999.[CrossRef]
  31. Vanderkwaak T. J., Wang M., Gomez-Navarro J., Rancourt C., Dmitriev I., Krasnykh V., Barnes M., Siegal G. P., Alvarez R., Curiel D. T. An advanced generation of adenoviral vectors selectively enhances gene transfer for ovarian cancer gene therapy approaches. Gynecol. Oncol., 74: 227-234, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Freeman S. M., Abboud C. N., Whartenby K. A., Packman C. H., Koeplin D. S., Moolten F. L., Abraham G. N. The bystander effect: tumor regression when a fraction of the tumor mass is genetically modified. Cancer Res., 53: 5274-5283, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Bouvet M., Ellis L. M., Nishizaki M., Fujiwara T., Liu W., Bucana C. D., Fang B., Lee J. J., Roth J. A. Adenovirus-mediated wild-type p53 gene transfer down-regulates vascular endothelial growth factor expression and inhibits angiogenesis in human colon cancer. Cancer Res., 58: 2288-2292, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Dilber M. S., Phelan A., Aints A., Mohamed A. J., Elliott G., Edvard Smith C. I., O’Hare P. Intercellular delivery of thymidine kinase prodrug activating enzyme by the herpes simplex virus protein, VP22. Gene Ther., 6: 12-21, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
J. A. McLear, D. Lebrecht, A. Messer, and W. J. Wolfgang
Combinational approach of intrabody with enhanced Hsp70 expression addresses multiple pathologies in a fly model of Huntington's disease
FASEB J, June 1, 2008; 22(6): 2003 - 2011.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. Jiang, W. Shi, Q. Zhang, X. Wang, M. Guo, Z. Cui, C. Su, Q. Yang, Y. Li, J. Sham, et al.
Gene Therapy Using Adenovirus-Mediated Full-length Anti-HER-2 Antibody for HER-2 Overexpression Cancers.
Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2006; 12(20): 6179 - 6185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
K. Paz, L. A. Brennan, M. Iacolina, J. Doody, Y. R. Hadari, and Z. Zhu
Human single-domain neutralizing intrabodies directed against Etk kinase: a novel approach to impair cellular transformation
Mol. Cancer Ther., November 1, 2005; 4(11): 1801 - 1809.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
W. J. Wolfgang, T. W. Miller, J. M. Webster, J. S. Huston, L. M. Thompson, J. L. Marsh, and A. Messer
Suppression of Huntington's disease pathology in Drosophila by human single-chain Fv antibodies
PNAS, August 9, 2005; 102(32): 11563 - 11568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. Sako, J. Kitayama, H. Koyama, H. Ueno, H. Uchida, H. Hamada, and H. Nagawa
Transduction of Soluble Flt-1 Gene to Peritoneal Mesothelial Cells Can Effectively Suppress Peritoneal Metastasis of Gastric Cancer
Cancer Res., May 15, 2004; 64(10): 3624 - 3628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
B. Sangro, G. Mazzolini, J. Ruiz, M. Herraiz, J. Quiroga, I. Herrero, A. Benito, J. Larrache, J. Pueyo, J. C. Subtil, et al.
Phase I Trial of Intratumoral Injection of an Adenovirus Encoding Interleukin-12 for Advanced Digestive Tumors
J. Clin. Oncol., April 15, 2004; 22(8): 1389 - 1397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
L. Barzon, M. Boscaro, and G. Palu
Endocrine Aspects of Cancer Gene Therapy
Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2004; 25(1): 1 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. J. Korst and R. G. Crystal
Active, specific immunotherapy for lung cancer: hurdles and strategies using genetic modification
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2003; 76(4): 1319 - 1326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
O. Artsaenko, K. Tessmann, M. Sack, D. Haussinger, and T. Heintges
Abrogation of hepatitis C virus NS3 helicase enzymatic activity by recombinant human antibodies
J. Gen. Virol., September 1, 2003; 84(9): 2323 - 2332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. Indraccolo, W. Habeler, V. Tisato, L. Stievano, E. Piovan, V. Tosello, G. Esposito, R. Wagner, K. Uberla, L. Chieco-Bianchi, et al.
Gene Transfer in Ovarian Cancer Cells: A Comparison between Retroviral and Lentiviral Vectors
Cancer Res., November 1, 2002; 62(21): 6099 - 6107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
S. Canevari, S. Biocca, and M. Figini
Re: Blocking Oncogenic Ras Signaling for Cancer Therapy
J Natl Cancer Inst, July 3, 2002; 94(13): 1031 - 1032.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
A. Hemminki, K. R. Zinn, B. Liu, T. R. Chaudhuri, R. A. Desmond, B. E. Rogers, M. N. Barnes, R. D. Alvarez, and D. T. Curiel
In Vivo Molecular Chemotherapy and Noninvasive Imaging With an Infectivity-Enhanced Adenovirus
J Natl Cancer Inst, May 15, 2002; 94(10): 741 - 749.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. Kanerva, G. V. Mikheeva, V. Krasnykh, C. J. Coolidge, J. T. Lam, P. J. Mahasreshti, S. D. Barker, M. Straughn, M. N. Barnes, R. D. Alvarez, et al.
Targeting Adenovirus to the Serotype 3 Receptor Increases Gene Transfer Efficiency to Ovarian Cancer Cells
Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2002; 8(1): 275 - 280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
P. J. Mahasreshti, J. G. Navarro, M. Kataram, M. H. Wang, D. Carey, G. P. Siegal, M. N. Barnes, D. M. Nettelbeck, R. D. Alvarez, A. Hemminki, et al.
Adenovirus-mediated Soluble FLT-1 Gene Therapy for Ovarian Carcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2001; 7(7): 2057 - 2066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alvarez, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Curiel, D. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alvarez, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Curiel, D. T.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online