
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates |
Is an Androgen-responsive Gene in Human Prostate and Is Highly Expressed in Prostatic Adenocarcinoma1
School of Surgical and Reproductive Sciences, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle NE2 4HH, United Kingdom
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
is a member of the
nuclear receptor superfamily of ligand-activated transcription factors.
PPAR
is activated by peroxisome proliferators and fatty acids and
has been shown to be involved in the transcriptional regulation of
genes involved in fatty acid metabolism. In rodents, the
PPAR
-mediated change in such genes results in peroxisome
proliferation and can lead to the induction of hepatocarcinogenesis.
Using the mRNA differential display technique and Northern blot
analysis, we have shown that chronic exposure of the prostate cancer
epithelial cell line LNCaP to the synthetic androgen mibolerone results
in the down-regulation of PPAR
mRNA. Levels of PPAR
mRNA are
reduced to approximately 40% of control levels in LNCaP cells exposed
to 10 nM mibolerone for 96 h. PPAR
-responsive
reporter plasmids derived from human ApoA-II and muscle carnitine
palmitoyl-transferase I genes were stimulated by the
PPAR
-activating ligand Wy-14,643 in LNCaP cells. In
situ hybridization and immunohistochemical analyses showed that
PPAR
expression in prostate is confined to epithelial cells. In
benign prostatic tissue, PPAR
mRNA was either absent or only weakly
expressed in the basal epithelial cells. In 11 of 18 (61%) poorly
differentiated (Gleason score, 810) prostatic carcinoma specimens,
there was strong expression of PPAR
compared with 4 of 12 Gleason
score 7 tumors and 2 of 11 Gleason score 36 tumors
(P < 0.01). These results suggest that PPAR
is
found and functional in human prostate and is down-regulated by
androgens. The role of PPAR
may be to integrate dietary fatty acid
and steroid hormone signaling pathways, and its overexpression in
advanced prostate cancer may indicate a role in tumor progression with
the potential involvement of dietary factors. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
hydroxylation (5)
.
Long-term exposure leads to the induction of hepatomegaly and
hepatocellular carcinoma (6)
. These effects of peroxisome
proliferators are predominantly mediated via
PPAR
,3
a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily of ligand-activated
transcription factors. This receptor and other members of its
subfamily, PPARß and PPAR
, regulate the transcription of target
genes by binding to PPREs as a heterodimer with retinoid X receptor
(7
, 8)
. However, PPARß and PPAR
show greatly reduced
sensitivity to peroxisome proliferators compared with PPAR
(9)
.
In addition to peroxisome proliferators, PPAR
is also activated by
fatty acids and fatty acid metabolites, leading to the induction of
several genes involved in lipid metabolism as well as those not related
to lipid metabolism such as transthyretin and
2u-globulin (10)
. The role of
PPAR
in fatty acid metabolism has been confirmed by the generation
of a PPAR
-null mouse (11)
. These animals are
phenotypically normal and have normal basal levels of hepatic
peroxisomes but are nonresponsive to peroxisome proliferation and do
not display induction of target genes. Furthermore, these mice show
altered constitutive expression of mitochondrial fatty
acid-metabolizing enzymes (12)
and changes in
apolipoprotein and high-density lipoprotein metabolism
(13)
.
In humans, PPAR
is most highly expressed in the liver, heart, and
kidney and is expressed at lower levels in other tissues (14
, 15)
. However, hepatic levels of the receptor in humans are
significantly lower than those in rats and mice, and it has been
proposed that this accounts for the human liver being refractory to the
pathological effects of peroxisome proliferator exposure
(16)
. Nevertheless, it is clear that PPAR
has a
functional role in humans because the hypolipidemic effects of fibrate
drugs in humans are mediated through the receptor (17)
.
PPAR
has been shown to be regulated by glucocorticoids
(18)
, insulin (19)
, and tumor necrosis factor
(20)
. In this study, we identify PPAR
as an
androgen-regulated gene in human prostatic cells and describe its
expression in human prostatic carcinoma.
| PATIENTS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell Culture.
Primary epithelial cell cultures were prepared from tissue obtained
from patients undergoing transurethral prostatectomy for BPH as
described previously (21)
. Epithelial cells were cultured
in WAJC 404 medium supplemented with HEPES (pH 7.6; 25 mM),
sodium hydrogen carbonate (15 mM), zinc-stabilized insulin
(2.5 µg/ml), cholera toxin (10 ng/ml), dexamethasone (1
µM), epidermal growth factor (10 ng/ml), 0.5% bovine
pituitary extract, heparin (4 units/ml), sodium selenite (10 ng/ml),
transferrin (10 µg/ml), penicillin (100 units/ml), and streptomycin
(100 µg/ml). All primary cultures were used at the second passage and
demonstrated to be responsive to androgens in proliferation assays
using radiolabeled mibolerone (21)
. LNCaP cells (passage
3338) were routinely maintained in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10%
FCS, 1% glutamine, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml
streptomycin. For androgen exposures, primary epithelial cells were
washed twice with PBS and then incubated with either WAJC medium or
WAJC medium containing 10 nM mibolerone for 048 h before
harvesting. LNCaP cells were washed twice with PBS and then exposed to
RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% steroid-depleted DCC-treated FCS for
72 h. The cells were then incubated with DCC medium or DCC medium
containing 10 nM mibolerone for 096 h before harvesting.
For prolonged exposures to androgens (7296 h), the growth media were
replaced at 48 h. To investigate the effects of the nonsteroidal
antiandrogen casodex, cells were exposed to 10 µM casodex
for 24 h, followed by the addition of 10 nM mibolerone
in the presence of casodex for an additional 1296 h.
Differential Display.
Differential display was performed essentially as described previously
(22)
, with the following modifications. Total RNA was
extracted from cells as described previously (23)
.
Polyadenylated RNA was purified using Dynabeads
oligo(dT)25 according to the manufacturers
protocol (Dynal), and 0.25 µg was reverse-transcribed using
T12VG as primer and avian myeloblastosis virus
reverse transcriptase (400 units/ml). Differential display was
performed in duplicate using primers T12VG and
1019 (GGTACTCCAC), [
-32P]dATP (500
µCi/ml), and AmpliTaq DNA polymerase (50 units/ml). Samples were
subjected to 30 cycles of PCR comprising 94°C for 30 s, 40°C
for 20 s, and 72°C for 30 s. PCR products were
electrophoresed on 6% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels for 20 h
at 500 V. DNA from bands thought to be differentially expressed was
extracted by elution into 200 µl of water, and the cDNA was recovered
by ethanol precipitation. Eluted cDNA was reamplified using 30 cycles
of PCR with the appropriate primers and cloned into the pCRII vector
(Invitrogen) according to the manufacturers protocol. The DNA
sequences of the isolated clones were determined using the
Thermo-Sequenase cycle sequencing kit (Amersham Life Sciences), and
homologies to known genes were determined using the GenBank database.
Northern Analysis.
Total RNA samples were electrophoresed as described previously
(24)
. Briefly, RNA (5 µg) was fractionated on an agarose
gel, transferred to a nylon membrane (Hybond N+;
Amersham), fixed by heating at 80°C for 2 h, and stained with
methylene blue to assess the integrity of the RNA. Probes were
generated from cloned cDNAs by restriction endonuclease digestion and
radiolabeled with [
-32P]dATP using
random-primed labeling mixture according to the manufacturers
protocol (Boehringer Mannheim). Hybridization and washing were carried
out as described previously (25)
. Blots were analyzed
after exposure to a phosphor storage screen using a PhosphorImager
(Molecular Dynamics) and subsequently reprobed with radiolabeled
GAPDH cDNA as a control for RNA loading.
Western Analysis.
Lysates were prepared by standard methods. Approximately equal amounts
of protein (10 µg/lane) were resolved on 12% polyacrylamide gels.
Proteins were blotted onto Hybond C extra membrane (Amersham).
Filters were blocked in 5% nonfat milk in PBS and 0.05% Tween 20 at
room temperature for 60 min. Primary and secondary antibody incubations
were performed in 1% nonfat milk in PBS and 0.05% Tween 20 for 60
min. Washings were performed as recommended by the manufacturers, and
signals were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham).
Plasmids and DNA Transfections.
The J3TKpGL3 plasmid containing three
copies of the human ApoA-II gene PPRE-containing J site cloned upstream
of the thymidine kinase promoter in the pGL3 luciferase expression
vector was obtained from Dr. Bart Staels (Institut Pasteur de
Lille, Lille, France). pMCPTLuc.781 containing a single
PPRE, its derivative pMCPTLuc.781m1 containing a mutated inactive PPRE,
and murine PPAR
-expressing plasmid pPPAR
(26)
were
obtained from Dr. Daniel Kelly (Washington University, St. Louis, MO).
pCMVßGal was purchased from Clontech.
LNCaP cells were transfected at 4050% confluence in Corning 6-well
plates using Superfect reagent (Qiagen) according to the
manufacturers instructions. Plasmid DNA totaled 0.6 µg/well,
comprising 0.25 µg of luciferase reporter plasmid, 0.1 µg of
PPAR
expression plasmid (where indicated), and 0.25 µg of
pCMVßGal internal control plasmid. After transfections, cells were
washed with PBS and transferred to RPMI 1640 containing 100
µM Wy-14,643 (Calbiochem) or vehicle
(Me2SO4) and incubated for
an additional 72 h. Luciferase and ß-galactosidase activities
were determined on cell extracts using reporter lysis buffer (Promega).
Transfections were performed at least three times, in quadruplicate.
Results, which were expressed as relative luciferase activity, were
corrected for differences in transfection frequency by standardizing
against ß-galactosidase activities.
ISH.
Digoxigenin-labeled antisense and sense PPAR
probes were generated
using a 621-bp PPAR
cDNA cloned into the pCRII vector as template.
Linearization of the plasmid was carried out using the appropriate
restriction endonuclease, and probes were then synthesized using the
digoxigenin labeling kit (Boehringer Mannheim) according to the
manufacturers protocol. Deparaffinized, rehydrated prostatic tissue
sections (5 µM) on silane-coated microscope slides were
permeabilized by incubation in proteinase 75 (20 µg/ml) for 30 min at
37°C and acetylated in PBS containing 0.25% acetic anhydride and 0.1
M triethanolamine for 10 min at room temperature.
Prehybridization was carried out in 50% formamide, 4x SSC, 1x
Denhardts solution, 125 µg/ml tRNA, and 100 µg/ml freshly
denatured salmon sperm DNA for 30 min at 42°C. Hybridization was
performed using prehybridization solution containing denatured PPAR
antisense or sense probes (50 ng/slide) for 16 h at 42°C. Washes
were then carried out at 52°C (2x SSC and 50% formamide, 30 min;
1x SSC and 50% formamide, 30 min; 0.5x SSC and 50% formamide, 30
min). The slides were then washed in buffer 1 [150 mM NaCl
and 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5)] and incubated in buffer 1
containing 5% BSA and 0.3% Triton X-100 for 30 min at room
temperature. The sections were incubated in alkaline
phosphatase-conjugated antidigoxigenin antibody diluted 1:500 in buffer
1 containing 5% BSA and 0.3% Triton X-100 for 2 h at room
temperature. After washing in buffer 1, the slides were briefly
immersed in buffer 2 [100 mM NaCl, 50 mM
MgCl2, and 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 9.5)]
and incubated in buffer 2 containing 0.34 mg/ml nitroblue tetrazolium
and 0.18 mg/ml 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate in the dark for
16 h at 4°C. The slides were then immersed in 10 mM
Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA buffer (pH 8.0), rinsed in
water, counterstained with Mayers hematoxylin, and mounted in
Glycergel mounting medium.
Immunohistochemistry.
For immunohistochemical studies, rabbit antiserum raised against
the full-length recombinant PPAR
was kindly provided by Dr. David R.
Bell (University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom).
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded prostatic tissue sections were
dewaxed, rehydrated, and trypsinized at 37°C for 15 min. Endogenous
peroxidase was blocked with hydrogen peroxide in methanol, and
nonspecific staining was blocked by incubation with normal goat serum.
Sections were incubated with the rabbit primary antibody diluted 1:50
for 1 h and then incubated with a biotinylated goat antirabbit
antibody diluted 1:500 for 30 min. The detection of the antibody
reaction was carried out using a standard streptavidin-biotin complex
(DAKO) combined with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine color development. As
a negative control, incubation with the primary antibody was omitted.
Statistical Analysis.
Comparison of PPAR
expression was carried out by means of the
2 test with Yates correction for continuity.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
As an Androgen-responsive Gene.
gene.
Effect of Androgen on PPAR
Levels in LNCaP Cells.
Attempts to confirm the putative androgen-regulated expression of
PPAR
in primary epithelial cells by Northern analysis using the
362-bp cDNA fragment obtained from differential display as a probe were
unsuccessful because PPAR
mRNA was undetectable using this
technique, reflecting the decreased sensitivity of Northern analysis
compared with the PCR-based differential display technique. However,
PPAR
mRNA was detectable and shown to be androgen regulated in the
androgen-responsive human prostate cancer cell line LNCaP. A 1.8-kb
transcript was detected that was identical to the previously reported
size of PPAR
mRNA (27)
. In each of five separate
experiments, PPAR
was shown to be down-regulated to between 41% and
54% of control levels in response to treatment with 10 nM
mibolerone for 96 h (Fig. 1)
. A comparable down-regulation of PPAR
was observed using 0.1 and 1
nM mibolerone. Treatment of cells with 10 µM
casodex, a nonsteroidal antiandrogen, resulted in the complete
abolition of the androgen-induced down-regulation of PPAR
mRNA (data
not shown).
|
Is Functional in LNCaP Cells.
expressed in LNCaP cells
was able to mediate ligand-induced effects, we performed luciferase
reporter assays using plasmid constructs containing multiple PPREs
derived from the PPAR
-responsive human ApoA-II and muscle carnitine
palmitoyltransferase I genes combined with the PPAR
-specific ligand
Wy-14,643. Fig. 2
-activating ligand Wy-14,643.
Control experiments using a mutated PPRE reporter plasmid derived from
the muscle carnitine palmitoyl-transferase I gene failed to exhibit a
response to Wy-14,643 in LNCaP cells (data not shown). Further
transfection with a PPAR
-expressing cDNA enhanced the Wy-14,643
ligand-induced response approximately 3-fold (Fig. 2)
is functional in LNCaP cells.
|
riboprobes to
representative sections of human benign prostatic tissue and prostatic
adenocarcinoma is shown in Fig. 3
was detected exclusively in the cytoplasm of
prostatic epithelial cells, with no signals in the prostatic stroma.
BPH samples and histologically benign areas of prostatic tissue present
in sections of prostate cancer were negative or exhibited low levels of
patchy staining in the basal epithelial cells (Fig. 3
mRNA expression was related to the
histological grade of the tumor and to the tumor stage. Table 1
(Fig. 3
compared with 6 of 24 of the remaining samples
(P < 0.05). Sections hybridized with the corresponding
sense probe showed no detectable signal (Fig. 3
|
|
|
protein was detected exclusively
in the cytoplasm of the epithelial cells, with no staining in the
stromal compartment (Fig. 3
protein was
either absent or weakly expressed. This pattern of expression was
confirmed in an additional 12 samples. | DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have previously used the differential display technique to
identify androgen-responsive genes in human prostatic cells (33
, 34)
. In this study, we have identified PPAR
as an
androgen-responsive gene. Direct exposure of LNCaP cells to 10
nM mibolerone resulted in a down-regulation of PPAR
to
approximately 40% of control levels after 96 h. This effect was
abolished by the treatment of cells with the nonsteroidal antiandrogen
casodex, demonstrating that the androgen receptor is directly involved
in this process. The kinetics of down-regulation of PPAR
by
androgens in LNCaP cells is similar to those of other steroid
receptors, such as the androgen receptor and the orphan receptor TR2.
All three receptors show maximal down-regulation between 48 and 96 h of androgen treatment to between 40% and 60% of control levels
(35
, 36) . The relatively long androgen exposure time
required to cause down-regulation suggests that this response may be a
secondary effect of androgen exposure. This hypothesis is supported by
our finding that the androgen-induced down-regulation of PPAR
is
completely abolished by the treatment of cells with the protein
synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (data not shown). In the case of the
human androgen receptor, the lack of an androgen response element in
the promoter region, combined with the presence of cAMP and AP-1
binding sites, indicates that regulation may occur via interaction with
other transcription factors (37)
. Alternatively, androgen
may regulate the release of autocrine/paracrine factors that directly
down-regulate PPAR
expression. Previous studies in which male rats
have been shown to display a greater response to peroxisome
proliferators than females (38
, 39)
and the adrenal
androgen dehydroepiandrosterone has been shown to be able to elicit a
peroxisome proliferative response in rodents (40)
have
supported the possibility of a link between androgens and PPARs.
However, these instances would more likely involve an androgen-mediated
increase in PPAR
as opposed to the down-regulation that we have
found in our study.
Western analysis and transient transfection studies demonstrated
that PPAR
is present at low levels in LNCaP cells and is responsive
to the highly specific ligand Wy-14,643. Cross-talk between the
signaling pathways for androgen receptor and PPAR
likely occurs
through common coactivator proteins (41)
. Preliminary
transfection studies suggest that androgens decrease PPAR
-mediated
transcriptional activity and, furthermore, that PPAR
-activating
ligands stimulate transcription of the androgen-responsive PSA gene
through the androgen
receptor.4
At the present time, we can only speculate on the downstream effects of
regulation of PPAR
expression by androgens. Genes regulated by
PPAR
include those involved in both intracellular and extracellular
lipid metabolism (42
, 43)
. Androgens have previously been
shown to induce an accumulation of lipid droplets in LNCaP cells
(44)
, and a key lipogenic enzyme, fatty acid synthase, is
up-regulated by androgens in these cells (45)
.
Furthermore, the finding that several other enzymes involved in fatty
acid synthesis and in the biosynthesis of cholesterol are regulated by
androgens in LNCaP cells has led to the proposal that androgens might
not affect the expression of all these enzymes individually but instead
may modulate the expression and/or activity of one or more common
transcription factor(s) involved in the coordinate control of these
lipogenic genes (46)
. It is possible therefore that
PPAR
may be one such factor. However, most enzymes involved in lipid
metabolism that have been identified thus far as being regulated by
PPAR
are involved in catabolic pathways; therefore, it may be that
down-regulation of these enzymes as a consequence of androgen-mediated
reduction in PPAR
expression results in a concomitant increase in
fatty acid synthesis.
ISH was carried out to examine the distribution of PPAR
mRNA in
samples of human benign prostatic tissue and prostatic adenocarcinoma.
The specificity of the riboprobes used was confirmed by Northern
analysis, demonstrating a single transcript of 1.8 kb as described
previously (27)
. This was significantly different from
human PPARß and PPAR
, which show a high degree of homology to
PPAR
but have transcript sizes of 4 and 2.1 kb, respectively
(47
, 48)
. Although ISH does not allow accurate
quantification of PPAR
mRNA expression, our findings clearly show an
increase in expression of PPAR
in high-grade, poorly differentiated
prostatic adenocarcinoma compared with benign epithelium or
well-differentiated tumor. This pattern of expression was confirmed by
our immunohistochemical results, which showed that PPAR
protein was
present at higher levels in tumor cells than in benign epithelium. The
finding that PPAR
was expressed in the cytoplasm is in agreement
with a previous immunohistochemical study (49)
. To our
knowledge, this is the first demonstration of PPAR
expression in
human prostate, and the pattern of expression that we have observed
suggests that it may be associated with the development and/or
progression of prostate cancer. The finding that PPAR
is expressed
in the basal epithelial cells of some benign glands is also of
interest. Basal cells have been advocated as having specific properties
in the progression of benign prostatic cells to the malignant
phenotype; the majority of proliferating cells in atypical hyperplasias
that progress to invasive carcinomas are localized in the basal cells
(50)
. Therefore, the expression of proteins in these cells
is likely to play a role in the behavior of developing tumors.
Activation of PPAR
by peroxisome proliferators can ultimately lead
to hepatocarcinogenesis in rats and mice. Although this process has not
been observed in humans, PPARs have been suggested to play a role in
other human cancers, including breast (51
, 52) and colon
(53)
cancer. Recently, it has been shown that PPAR
is
expressed at prominent levels in prostate cancer cells, but normal
prostatic tissue had very low-level expression of PPAR
(54)
. Furthermore, the ligand for PPAR
, troglitazone,
showed potent antitumor effects against prostate cancer both in
vitro and in vivo (54)
. The action of PPAR
ligands,
including Wy-14,643 and fatty acids, on prostate cell growth is now
being studied. Interestingly, a high intake of dietary fat has been
implicated in the progression of prostate cancer (55
, 56)
;
it is possible, therefore, that it may be mediated via the activation
of PPAR
by fatty acids and their metabolites. Indeed, a study has
shown that treatment of food-restricted rats with nafenopin, a
peroxisome proliferator and potent tumor promoter, produced only half
as many hepatocellular adenomas and carcinomas as seen in animals fed
unrestrictedly (57)
. The possible involvement of
PPAR
-activating ligands in prostate tumor formation is currently
being investigated. Mutations in the androgen receptor are frequently
observed in advanced prostate cancer and may also effect the cross-talk
between androgen receptor and PPAR
signaling pathways, resulting in
an up-regulation of PPAR
.
In summary, we have shown that PPAR
is an androgen-regulated gene in
human prostate and is highly expressed in prostatic carcinoma. Further
study on the downstream effects of this receptor will be required to
assess any role that it may play in the development and progression of
prostate cancer.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
rabbit polyclonal
antibody. | FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 This work and the laboratory were supported by
the Medical Research Council, United Kingdom; the Cancer Research
Campaign; and Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals Trusts Funds. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, at Department of Surgery, The Medical School, University of
Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom.
Phone: 44-191-222-7076; Fax: 44-191-222-8514; E-mail: c.n.robson{at}ncl.ac.uk ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: PPAR, peroxisome
proliferator-activated receptor; PPRE, peroxisome proliferator response
element; BPH, benign prostatic hyperplasia; DCC, dextran-coated
charcoal; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; PSA,
prostate-specific antigen; ISH, in situ hybridization. ![]()
4 G. P. Collett and C. N. Robson, unpublished
data. ![]()
Received 10/ 7/99; revised 4/20/00; accepted 5/ 4/00.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
mediates peroxisome proliferator-induced transcriptional repression of nonperoxisomal gene expression in mouse. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 230: 155-158, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
isoform of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gene in mice results in abolishment of the pleiotropic effects of peroxisome proliferators. Mol. Cell. Biol., 15: 3012-3022, 1995.[Abstract]
(PPAR
). J. Biol. Chem., 273: 5678-5684, 1998.
-deficient mice. J. Biol. Chem., 272: 27307-27312, 1997.
expression in human liver. Mol. Pharmacol., 53: 14-22, 1998.
gene by glucocorticoids. J. Biol. Chem., 269: 24527-24530, 1994.
is a phosphoprotein: regulation by insulin. Endocrinology, 137: 4499-4502, 1996.[Abstract]
down-regulates the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-
and the mRNAs encoding peroxisomal proteins in rat liver. FEBS Lett., 412: 385-387, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
. J. Biol. Chem., 273: 23786-23792, 1998.
and PPAR
activators direct a distinct tissue-specific transcriptional response via a PPRE in the lipoprotein lipase gene. EMBO J., 15: 5336-5348, 1996.[Medline]
and
induces apoptosis of human monocyte-derived macrophages. J. Biol. Chem., 273: 25573-25580, 1998.
. Mol. Cell, 1: 465-470, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
, is aberrantly expressed in colonic cancers. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 19: 49-53, 1998.
(Triglitazone) has potent antitumor effect against human prostate cancer both in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Res., 58: 3344-3352, 1998.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Panigrahy, A. Kaipainen, S. Huang, C. E. Butterfield, C. M. Barnes, M. Fannon, A. M. Laforme, D. M. Chaponis, J. Folkman, and M. W. Kieran PPAR{alpha} agonist fenofibrate suppresses tumor growth through direct and indirect angiogenesis inhibition PNAS, January 22, 2008; 105(3): 985 - 990. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-H. Kim, K. Yamaguchi, S.-H. Lee, P. K. Tithof, G. S. Sayler, J.-H. Yoon, and S. J. Baek Evaluation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in the Activation of Early Growth Response-1 and Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptors Toxicol. Sci., May 1, 2005; 85(1): 585 - 593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Holland, S. A. Saidi, A. L. Evans, A. M. Sharkey, J. A. Latimer, R. A.F. Crawford, D. S. Charnock-Jones, C. G. Print, and S. K. Smith Transcriptome analysis of endometrial cancer identifies peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors as potential therapeutic targets Mol. Cancer Ther., August 1, 2004; 3(8): 993 - 1001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Saez, J. Rosenfeld, A. Livolsi, P. Olson, E. Lombardo, M. Nelson, E. Banayo, R. D. Cardiff, J. C. Izpisua-Belmonte, and R. M. Evans PPAR{gamma} signaling exacerbates mammary gland tumor development Genes & Dev., March 1, 2004; 18(5): 528 - 540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Barbier, D. Duran-Sandoval, I. Pineda-Torra, V. Kosykh, J.-C. Fruchart, and B. Staels Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor {alpha} Induces Hepatic Expression of the Human Bile Acid Glucuronidating UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B4 Enzyme J. Biol. Chem., August 29, 2003; 278(35): 32852 - 32860. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Kopelovich, J. R. Fay, R. I. Glazer, and J. A. Crowell Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor Modulators As Potential Chemopreventive Agents Mol. Cancer Ther., March 1, 2002; 1(5): 357 - 363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Morton, M. C. Holmes, C. Fievet, B. Staels, A. Tailleux, J. J. Mullins, and J. R. Seckl Improved Lipid and Lipoprotein Profile, Hepatic Insulin Sensitivity, and Glucose Tolerance in 11beta -Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 1 Null Mice J. Biol. Chem., October 26, 2001; 276(44): 41293 - 41300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |