Clinical Cancer Research The Science of Cancer Health Disparities
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, K.
Right arrow Articles by Scott, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, K.
Right arrow Articles by Scott, A. M.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 6, 3621-3628, September 2000
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research


Experimental Therapeutics, Preclinical Pharmacology

Therapeutic Efficacy of Anti-Lewisy Humanized 3S193 Radioimmunotherapy in a Breast Cancer Model: Enhanced Activity When Combined with Taxol Chemotherapy

Kerrie Clarke, Fook-Thean Lee, Martin W. Brechbiel, Fiona E. Smyth, Lloyd J. Old and Andrew M. Scott1

Tumour Targeting Program, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Melbourne Branch, Austin and Repatriation Medical Centre, Victoria 3084, Australia [K. C., F-T. L., F. E. S., A. M. S.]; Radioimmune and Inorganic Chemistry Section, Radiation Oncology Branch, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 [M. W. B.]; and Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, New York Branch, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021 [L. J. O.]


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Response and Toxicity...
 Statistical Analysis
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Monoclonal antibody therapy may provide new treatment options in the management of metastatic breast cancer by selectively targeting tumors and producing a therapeutic effect, by delivering radiation or other toxins directly to tumor cells, or by producing an intrinsic immune inflammatory response. The effect of 131I-labeled humanized anti-Lewisy monoclonal antibody 3S193 (hu3S193) was compared with that of placebo and radiolabeled huA33 control antibody in a series of radioimmunotherapy experiments in a MCF-7 xenografted BALB/c nude mouse breast cancer model. The maximum tolerated dose of 131I-labeled antibody occurred at 200 µCi/mouse, at which dose level three of six mice that received 131I-hu3S193 showed significant tumor growth inhibition in contrast to no responses in the comparable 131I-huA33 control treatment arm. Breast cancer is an ideal model to test the efficacy of combined modalities given its known sensitivity to both radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The synergy between radioimmunotherapy and chemotherapy was therefore also explored using a combination of 131I-labeled hu3S193 antibody and Taxol using subtherapeutic doses of each agent. The combination of Taxol and 100 µCi of 131I-hu3S193 produced significant tumor inhibition in 80% of mice, whereas no responses were seen with either treatment modality alone or the combination of Taxol and 131I-huA33. These results support a potential therapeutic role of radiolabeled hu3S193 in the treatment of breast cancer, including combination therapy with Taxol, and warrants further investigation of this promising new agent.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Response and Toxicity...
 Statistical Analysis
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Breast cancer is a radiation- and chemotherapy-sensitive malignancy, but despite new agents and approaches to treatment, the median survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer has not altered significantly in recent years (1) . In metastatic disease, the duration of chemotherapy response may be limited by the emergence of resistant tumor cells. The role of radiotherapy in the management of breast cancer has been largely restricted to palliation of symptomatic sites of metastatic disease, in particular bone deposits, because of concerns regarding toxicity. mAb2 therapy may provide new treatment options in the management of metastatic breast cancer by selectively targeting tumors and producing a therapeutic effect mediated through growth factor receptors, by delivering radiation or other toxins directly to tumor cells, or by producing an intrinsic immune inflammatory response (2 , 3) .

A number of tumor antigens have been shown to have high expression on malignant breast cancer cells, including Her2/neu, MUC, carcinoembryonic antigen, and Ley (Ref. 2 ). The Ley antigen is a member of a family of blood group-related difucosylated oligosaccharides (4) . The Ley antigen has been shown to be expressed by 60–90% of human carcinomas of epithelial cell origin, including breast, pancreas, ovary, colon, gastric, and lung cancer, but it is present in only a few normal tissues (5, 6, 7) . The high frequency of Ley-expressing tumors, its high density and altered expression on the surface of tumor cells, and its relatively homogenous expression in primary and metastatic lesions have led to its selection as an antigenic target for a range of epithelial tumors, including breast cancer (8, 9, 10) .

3S193 is a mAb produced using a standard hybridoma technique after immunization of BALB/c nude mice with Ley-expressing MCF-7 breast cancer cells. The murine antibody has been shown to have high specificity for Ley and reacted strongly in rosetting assays and cytotoxic tests with Ley-expressing cells (11 , 12) . 3S193 has been humanized (hu3S193) and reactivity for Ley confirmed to be similar to the murine version (11 , 12) . Biodistribution studies of the 125I-, 111In-, and 90Y-labeled antibody showed that the antibody can be labeled, retains stability in vivo, and localizes to MCF-7 xenografts in imaging studies (13) .

In this study, a BALB/c nude mouse human breast cancer xenograft model was used to test the therapeutic potential of 131I-labeled hu3S193 and to explore the effects of combining chemotherapy with radioimmunotherapy. Taxol was selected for the combination therapy based on its relative ease of administration (i.p.) and the well-defined dosing profile in nude mice, which enabled subtherapeutic doses with negligible toxicity to be chosen. The sequence of radioimmunotherapy and chemotherapy administration has been reported to be of importance in achieving optimal tumor response (14 , 15) . In the current study, Taxol was administered i.p. 24 h after injection of radiolabeled antibody, based on previous studies in a xenografted mouse model demonstrating superior response rates for this regimen compared with Taxol given prior to radioimmunotherapy (14) .


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Response and Toxicity...
 Statistical Analysis
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
mAbs
The generation of murine 3S193 using standard hybridoma technique after immunization of BALB/c mice with Leyexpressing MCF-7 breast cancer cells and its subsequent humanization and characterization have been described previously (11 , 12) . hu3S193, a CDR-grafted IgG1 version of 3S193, was produced by Scotgen (Aberdeen, Scotland) in conjunction with the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research. hu3S193 used for the experiments outlined was obtained from both the New York Branch and the Biological Production Facility of the Melbourne Branch of the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research. huA33, an IgG1 humanized antibody (16) directed against a novel antigen found in >95% of colorectal cancers, was supplied by the New York Branch of the Ludwig Institute and used as a subclass-specific control.

Cell Lines
MCF-7, a Ley-expressing human breast adenocarcinoma cell line originally derived from the pleural effusion of a 69-year-old lady with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (17) , was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD). SW1222, a Ley-negative human colonic cancer cell line, was a gift from the tumor cell bank of the New York Branch of the Ludwig Institute and was used as a control cell line.

Cells were grown in 175 cm2 plastic flasks (Nalge NUNC International, Roskilde, Denmark) and maintained in log-phase growth in RPMI 1640 (Trace Chemicals, Sydney, Australia) supplemented with 10% (MCF-7) or 5% (SW1222) FCS (MultiSer; Trace Biosciences, Australia), 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, 0.25 ml/l insulin, 2 mM glutamine, and essential amino acids. Cells were cultured at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator (Forma Scientific Inc, Marietta, Ohio) and passaged with 0.05% EDTA-PBS (BDH Chemicals, Sydney, Australia.). Cell viability in all experiments, as determined by trypan blue exclusion, exceeded 90%.

Mouse Model
Xenografts were established in 5- to 6-week-old BALB/c nude mice, homozygous for the nu/nu allele and bred by the SPF Facility, University of South Australia. To establish MCF-7 human breast xenografts, mice were supplemented with exogenous estrogen (18) . After light ethrane anesthesia, a 60-day slow release estrogen pellet (0.72 mg of estradiol/pellet; Innovative Research of America, Sarasota, FL) was inserted using aseptic techniques into a small s.c. pocket fashioned between the shoulder blades. The surgical incision was closed with a single stitch (6–0 absorbable dacron or silk). MCF-7 cells (25 x 106) in 100–150 µl of medium were subsequently injected s.c. into the left inguinal mammary line. Mice were maintained in autoclaved microisolator cages housed in a positive pressure containment rack (Thoren Caging Systems Inc., Hazelton, PA). Mice were identified by ear marks and were observed daily for tumor growth and monitoring of surgical site for infection. Mice were divided into groups stratified to ensure an even distribution of tumor sizes within each group, thereby compensating for the individual variability of xenograft growth rates.

Tumor Measurements
Tumors were measured in the longest axis (L) and the axis at 90 degrees to the longest axis (W) by slide caliper two to three times a week. TV in mm3 was calculated by the formula: TV = (L x W2 )/2 (19) ; the mean TV (± SD) for each treatment group was calculated and graphed. TV was also expressed as percentage of change in TV compared with initial volume on day 0 according to the formula: TV change from time 0 (T0), % = [(TV at time of measurement - TV at T0)/TV at T0] x 100, where day 0 is the day of antibody injection (19) .

Antibody Labeling
Radioiodination was performed using a modification of a previously published chloramine-T reaction (20) , using a 2-fold molar excess of chloramine-T (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) over antibody dissolved in 0.5 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7). After a brief 2-min incubation period, the reaction was stopped by the addition of a 5-fold excess of sodium metabisulfite, again dissolved in a 0.5 M phosphate buffer, and the product was purified through a desalting column (P6DG; Bio-Rad, Sydney, Australia) equilibrated with PBS. The specific radioactivities of 131I-hu3S193 and 131I-huA33 control were 6.8 and 9.8 mCi/mg, respectively.

Radiolabeling was performed on the day of injection into mice. Prior to injection, the percentage of unbound radionuclide content was determined by instant TLC (21) , and the immunoreactive fraction of the final radiolabeled hu3S193 product was tested by a Ley-positive cell-binding assay according to Lindmo et al. (22) . For the control radioconjugate, an A33 antigen-positive colon carcinoma cell line, SW1222, was used.

Animal Model
131I Dose Escalation Study.
A single dose of 131I at 50, 100, 200, or 300 µCi/mouse, was injected retro-orbitally, bound to either hu3S193 or the subtype-specific control antibody (huA33). Six mice were used for each radiolabeled antibody at each dose level. At all doses, both hu3S193 and huA33 were administered at a protein concentration of 44 µg/mouse. This protein concentration was chosen based on the specific activity of 131I-hu3S193 (6.8mCi/mg), where 300 µCi equals a protein dose of 44 µg. Accordingly, where appropriate, cold mAbs were added to the radiolabeled conjugates to adjust for the selected protein dose. Five additional mice received injections of PBS alone as a placebo control arm.

Mice received injections of radiolabeled antibody or PBS 22 days after MCF-7 cell inoculation, at which time the mean TV for the study as a whole was 119.3 ± 26.79 mm3 (range, 112–126 mm3). The day of antibody injection was designated day 0 of the study. Mice were observed daily as described above, and TV was measured two to three times a week for 85 days. A treatment group was terminated if TV exceeded 1 g, toxicity occurred, or on day 85 of the study (based on the expected duration of the estrogen pellets). Postmortem examination was performed whenever possible on mice that died unexpectedly or after mice were culled for reasons of toxicity.

Combination Taxol and 131I-hu3S193 Study.
Synergy between radioimmunotherapy and chemotherapy was explored with the combination of 131I-labeled antibody and Taxol. 131I-hu3S193 was prepared as described above. A dose of 100 µCi of 131I per mouse was selected based on the results of the 131I-hu3S193 dose escalation study, which indicated no demonstrable toxicity at this dose. In addition, this dose was insufficient when given alone to effect complete or partial remissions. Taxol (Paclitaxol®; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ) was administered i.p. at one of two doses, 300 or 600 µg/mouse (1.5 µg/µl). It has been reported previously that Taxol in this dose range has no demonstrable toxicity in nude mice and when given alone is insufficient to cause complete or partial remissions in breast cancer xenografts (14) .

The combination therapy study comprised nine different treatment groups of four to five mice each: PBS-alone (control), Taxol alone at doses of 300 or 600 µg/mouse, 100 µCi of 131I-hu3S193 alone or combined with either 300 or 600 µg of Taxol, and 100 µCi of 131I-huA33 (isotype-matched antibody control) alone or in combination with 300 or 600 µg of Taxol. The mean size of tumors at the commencement of the study (day 0), 12 days after inoculation of MCF-7 cells, was 88.2 ± 5.6 mm3. Radiolabeled antibody was injected retro-orbitally to relevant treatment groups on day 0, and Taxol was injected on day 1 of the study, 24 h after injection of radiolabeled antibody. The study was terminated at day 78. As for the other therapeutic studies described, study groups were terminated at earlier times in the event of toxicity or tumor size >1 g. TVs were monitored daily, and the mean percentage of change in TV calculated at study completion as described.


    Response and Toxicity Definitions
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Response and Toxicity...
 Statistical Analysis
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
CR was defined as complete resolution of tumor and PR as a 50% reduction in TV compared with baseline. The MTD was defined as that dose given without causing >15% loss of body weight or >10% mortality in a treatment group (23) .


    Statistical Analysis
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Response and Toxicity...
 Statistical Analysis
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Statistical analysis was carried out with Sigmastat for Windows (Jandel Scientific, San Rafael, CA). t Tests were performed on TVs at day 42 in each study because this corresponded to the day of termination of control group 131I-huA33 at the lowest dose level (50 µCi). For results from the 131I-dose escalation study, a comparison was made among the 131I-dose-escalating groups for each mAb and then a comparison was performed between 131I-radiolabeled hu3S193 and the corresponding dose of control huA33. For results from the combination Taxol and 131I-hu3S193 study, t tests were performed between the day 42 mean TVs for each of the radiolabeled hu3S193 treatment groups and the appropriate controls of Taxol alone and radiolabeled huA33 mAb.


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Response and Toxicity...
 Statistical Analysis
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Antibody Labeling
Instant TLC of radiolabeled antibodies prior to injection confirmed that >95% of 131I bound to antibody. The immunoreactivity of 131I-hu3S193 was 60% for Ley-positive MCF-7 cells. Control 131I-huA33 was determined to have 73% immunoreactivity for A33-positive SW1222 colon carcinoma cells (data not shown).

Animal Model
131I-hu3S193 Dose Escalation Study.
Results for the 131I-hu3S193 dose escalation study at study completion are summarized in Table 1Citation . The dose-limiting toxicity of 131I occurred at 300 µCi. All mice treated at this dose level had some degree of toxicity manifested by petechiae and bruising of varying degrees of severity, and weight loss. In total, three of five mice that received 300 µCi of 131I-hu3S193 and four of six in the comparable 131I-huA33 group were culled between days 18 and 42 because of such toxicity, which was presumed to be secondary to the radiation dose received.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 131I-hu3S193 dose escalation study in mice bearing MCF-7 human breast carcinoma xenografts: study completion data

 
In the remaining treatment groups, there was only 1 death out of a total of 12 mice treated at 200 µCi of 131I, which occurred in the huA33 group, and 1 death at 50 and 100 µCi of 131I-huA33, respectively, which at postmortem appeared attributable to the presence of metastatic disease. Three mice (one each at 50 and 100 µCi of 131I-hu3S193 and 50 µCi of 131I-huA33) were culled because of weight loss for which no cause was found, although the possibility of micrometastatic disease was not excluded.

Comparative t tests were performed between and within the mAb treatment groups at day 42, the day of termination of the 50-µCi control 131I-huA33 treatment arm (Table 2)Citation . A significant dose-response relationship was present for 131I-labeled hu3S193, with higher doses producing marked tumor suppression compared with control 131I-huA33 (Fig. 1Citation and Table 2Citation ). 131I-hu3S193-treated mice at each dose level had slower tumor growth than mice receiving the corresponding dose of 131I-huA33. A significant difference was observed between the day 42 mean TVs of the treatment groups receiving 131I-labeled hu3S193 compared with the group receiving control mAb at 131I-dose levels >50 µCi (Table 2)Citation . Four of five mice in the 300-µCi 131I-hu3S193 treatment arm achieved at least a 50% reduction in TV (PR), and one achieved CR (Table 1)Citation . No reduction in TV was seen in the comparable huA33 group (Fig. 1D)Citation .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2 131I-hu3S193 dose escalation study in mice bearing MCF-7 human breast carcinoma xenografts: day 42 comparison

 


View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. MCF-7 xenograft growth curves comparing the tumor growth rates (mean TV; bars, SD) of established tumors in treatment groups of five to six mice receiving injections of PBS ({circ}) or increasing doses of 50, 100, 200, and 300 µ Ci of 131I-hu3S193 (•) or 131I-huA33 ({blacksquare}). A constant protein concentration of 44 µg/animal was administered for both antibodies at all radiation dose levels. Day 0 represents the day of radiolabeled antibody/PBS injection.

 
At the 200-µCi 131I-dose level, three of six mice in the hu3S193 treatment arm achieved a PR (of 2–22 days duration), and an additional two mice had a maximal reduction in TV of 43 and 46%, respectively (Fig. 1C)Citation . No responses or reduction in TV below baseline measurements were observed in the comparable huA33 group, which was terminated early (day 76) because of a mean TV >1 g. The differences between the two treatment arms, 131I-hu3S193 and 131I-huA33, was statistically significant from day 13 until termination (P = 0.006). A dose of 200 µCi of 131I-hu3S193 was established as the MTD.

There was a statistically significant difference in the growth curves at the 100-µCi dose level (P = 0.03 at day 42), with tumor growth being slower in the 131I-hu3S193 arm (Fig. 1B)Citation . The huA33 arm was terminated early, on day 62, because of TV >1 g. At the 50-µCi dose level, a marked delay in tumor growth after a single 50-µCi dose of 131I-hu3S913 was observed; however, this difference between xenograft growth curves was not statistical significant at day 42 when the control arm was terminated because of tumor burden, and no responses were observed (Tables 1Citation 2)Citation . Both unlabeled hu3S193 and huA33 treatment arms were terminated early on days 66 and 42, respectively, because of TV >1 g (Fig. 1A)Citation .

Combination Taxol and 131I-hu3S193 Study.
The results are summarized in Table 3Citation . Overall there was no difference in the mean TV for 100 µCi of 131I-hu3S193 alone or when combined with 300 µg of Taxol, although tumor growth rates of both were slower than matched 131I-huA33 controls (Fig. 2)Citation . Increasing the dose of Taxol from 300 to 600 µg resulted in a slower growth curve but no responses when given alone. However, 600 µg of Taxol combined with 131I-hu3S193 led to a marked reduction in tumor growth (P < 0.001 compared with 600 µg of Taxol alone, from day 42 to study completion), with four of five mice in the treatment arm achieving PR and with the response in one sustained to the end of the study (day 78). No responses were observed in the comparable huA33 control group (Fig. 3)Citation . These differences in tumor growth curves between the hu3S193 plus 600 µg of Taxol and the comparable huA33 plus Taxol control treatment arm were significant from day 13 until study termination (P = 0.004 at day 42). The mean TV of the treatment group receiving 100 µCi of hu3S193 plus 600 µg of Taxol was significantly less than the corresponding tumors of the treatment group receiving 100 µCi of hu3S193 plus 300 µg of Taxol from day 7 until study completion (P = 0.012 at day 42).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3 Combination therapy study: 100 µCi of 131I-hu3S193

 


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Comparison of established MCF-7 xenograft growth curves for mice that received 100 µCi of 131I-hu3S193 or 131I-huA33 on day 0, with or without the administration of 300 µg of Taxol 24 h later. Each treatment group contained four to five mice. Mean TVs (bars, SD) are presented for 100 µCi of 131I-hu3S193 plus 300 µg of Taxol ({diamondsuit}), 100 µCi of 131I-huA33 plus 300 µg of Taxol ({blacktriangleup}), 100 µCi of 131I-hu3S193 (•), and 100 µCi of 131I-huA33 ({blacksquare}). Control groups received PBS alone ({circ}) or 300 µg of Taxol alone ({blacktriangledown}).

 


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Comparison of established MCF-7 xenograft growth curves for mice that received 100 µCi of 131I-hu3S193 or 131I-huA33 on day 0, with or without the administration of 600 µg of Taxol 24 h later. Each treatment group contained five mice. Mean TVs (bars, SD) are presented for 100 µCi of 131I-hu3S193 plus 600 µg of Taxol ({diamondsuit}), 100 µCi of 131I-huA33 plus 600 µg of Taxol ({blacktriangleup}), 100 µCi of 131I-hu3S193 (•), and 100 µCi of 131I-huA33 ({blacksquare}). Control groups received PBS alone ({circ}) or 600 µg of Taxol alone ({blacktriangledown}).

 
Four mice were culled during the study for reasons other than tumor size. Metastatic disease was identified in one mouse in the 100-µCi 131I-hu3S193 arm sacrificed at day 56, and a second mouse in the 100-µCi huA33 group was culled at day 48 because of failure to thrive with no identifiable cause at postmortem. Two mice in the 100-µCi 131I-hu3S193 plus 600-µg Taxol arm were culled, one on day 56 and the other on day 71 because of an infected tail and an infected front leg, respectively. Infection occurred at sites of bites inflicted by other mice in the treatment group, highlighting the problem of increased aggression in estrogen-supplemented mice.


    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Response and Toxicity...
 Statistical Analysis
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The effectiveness of radioimmunotherapy is dependent on several parameters including the vascularity of a tumor, antigen expression and accessibility, radiolabeled antibody uptake and retention, and sensitivity of the tumor to radiation (2 , 24) . As anticipated with a radiation-sensitive malignancy such as breast cancer, we observed a significant dose-response relationship in the 131I-labeled anti-Ley study. The single 50-µCi 131I-hu3S193 dose delayed tumor growth for 35 days compared with the control treatment arm. Higher doses of 131I-hu3S193 (100, 200, and 300 µCi) produced significant reduction in tumor growth compared with 131I-labeled isotype-matched control humanized antibody huA33 over the entire period of study, with the 300-µCi dose achieving PR in four of five mice and CR in one of five mice. The MTD of 131I-hu3S193 occurred at the 200-µCi dose level, similar to other murine model studies with intact radiolabeled antibodies (25) . Other groups have been able to deliver higher doses of 131I-labeled antibody when administered as a single dose in a murine xenograft model (26) , as in this study. However, the major contributor to toxicity of 131I-labeled antibody is red marrow toxicity, which in turn is dependent on the circulating half-life of the radiolabeled antibody; the differences in blood clearance of radiolabeled antibody would explain the differences in toxicity observed (27 , 28) . Many parameters affect antibody half-life, including radiolabeling techniques, antibody-antigen binding, and antibody physical properties, and these could also contribute to the discrepancies between studies.

To assess the specificity or tumor-targeting ability of radiolabeled hu3S193 compared with a nonspecific radiation effect, an isotype-matched humanized control antibody (huA33), which does not bind Ley antigen, was included in all studies. In the 131I-labeled antibody study, a significant reduction in TV was seen in mice that received a single dose of radiolabeled hu3S193 compared with 131I-labeled control huA33, thus indicating specific targeting of radiolabel to MCF-7 tumor cells by hu3S193. Using this established MCF-7 tumor model, we previously have shown no effect for hu3S193 alone (five doses of up to 1 mg each) on MCF-7 tumor growth, indicating that the responses seen with radiolabeled hu3S193 are not attributable to Fc-mediated effects of the humanized antibody. hu3S193 was, however, shown to be effective in a prevention MCF-7 tumor model (injection at time of cell inoculation), indicating that in this murine model, antibody alone is effective in a minimal disease setting (11) .

The antigenic heterogeneity of solid tumor masses has been well documented. In addition, it has been proposed that loss of target tumor cell antigen expression after unconjugated antibody therapy may lead to selection of resistant tumor cell populations in a manner analogous to hormone- or chemotherapy-induced resistance. The application of radiolabeled mAbs as therapeutic agents may circumvent these problems of tumor escape. Radiolabeled antibodies, in contrast to naked antibodies, can effect cell death without binding to all cells in the tumor mass. With an appropriate radionuclide, binding to one antigen-positive cell may provide a lethal dose of radiotherapy to adjacent cells, whether antigen negative or positive, over a distance specified by the physical properties of the radionuclide chosen. The maximum range of the nonpenetrating ß-emissions of 131I is 2.4 mm (28) , and survival and repopulation of antigen-negative cells is therefore less likely with radiolabeled mAb therapy approaches.

Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy has proven advantageous in other antibody systems (24) . Responses observed with subtherapeutic (100 µCi) doses of 131I-huA33 in mice bearing human colon cancer xenografts were significantly greater after the addition of 5-fluorouracil (with or without leucovorin; Ref. 25 ). Breast cancer is an ideal model to test the efficacy of combined modalities given its known sensitivity to both radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Clinically, breast cancer is responsive to a wide range of single chemotherapeutic agents, including the microtubule-stabilizing agent Taxol (1) . Taxol was selected for the xenograft studies presented based on its relative ease of administration (i.p.) and the well-defined dosing profile in nude mice, which enabled subtherapeutic doses with negligible toxicity to be chosen. Taxol also arrests tumor cells at the G2-M phase of the cell cycle, which is the most radiosensitive phase and therefore ideally suited to combination therapy with radiolabeled antibody (14) . The sequence of radioimmunotherapy and chemotherapy administration has been reported to be of importance in achieving optimal tumor response (14) . In our study, Taxol was administered i.p. 24 h after injection of radiolabeled antibody. This schedule was determined from a published study where Taxol administered after radioimmunotherapy with 90Y-ChL6 produced superior response rates compared with Taxol given prior to radioimmunotherapy (14) . A dose of 100 µCi of 131I-hu3S193 was chosen for combined therapy studies because of the minimal toxicity and lack of definite responses observed at this dose level in the initial radioimmunotherapy experiments, which would allow additive or synergistic effects of combining this therapy with Taxol (also at subtherapeutic doses) to be evaluated.

The results obtained imply an advantage (additive or synergistic) for combined therapy over radioimmunotherapy alone, with four of five mice in the 600-µg Taxol plus 100-µCi 131I-hu3S193 group achieving a PR compared with no responses with either treatment modality when administered alone. As with the other studies performed, nonspecific, Fc-mediated antibody effect was excluded by the inclusion of an isotype-matched control antibody group. Whereas the group receiving 100 µCi of 131I-huA33 plus 600 µg of Taxol displayed slower tumor growth than other control groups, it was significantly inferior to the group receiving 100 µCi of 131I-hu3S193 plus 600 µg of Taxol, implying that nonspecific (nontargeted) radiation and chemotherapy sensitivity alone were not solely responsible for the responses observed. Although other chemotherapy agents have efficacy in breast cancer and antibody-drug conjugates have also been studied in clinical trials (10) , the efficacy of Taxol in breast cancer together with our results suggest that a combined approach could be a logical therapeutic option for Ley-positive malignancies.

Numerous criticisms have been made concerning the validity of animal models. In general, the therapeutic efficacy of antitumor agents tends to be overestimated in the nude mouse model (29) . The pharmacokinetic profile in nude mice differs from humans, and the MTD of most antitumor agents for nude mice is greater than the corresponding clinical dose, which is only partly compensated for by higher doses used in human studies (23) . In addition, with respect to antibody studies, the lack of expression of antigen in normal tissues in a manner comparable to humans and the consequent reduced nonspecific binding in murine models are known. However, human cancer xenografts in nude mice have been valuable in screening the therapeutic potential of new reagents, with good correlation having been demonstrated between the sensitivity of tumors to a drug in the human body and in BALB/c nude mice (19) . The significant responses observed in the therapeutic studies described indicate that hu3S193 is a promising new agent for the treatment of breast cancer, and further exploration of its therapeutic potential is warranted.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Austin and Repatriation Medical Centre, Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084, Australia. Phone: 613-9496-5876; Fax: 613-9496-5892; E-mail: ams{at}austin.unimelb.edu.au Back

2 The abbreviations used are: mAb, monoclonal antibody; Ley, Lewis Y antigen; TV, tumor volume; CR, clinical response; PR, partial response; MTD, maximum tolerated dose. Back

Received 1/14/00; revised 6/23/00; accepted 6/26/00.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Response and Toxicity...
 Statistical Analysis
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Smith G., Henderson I. C. New treatments for breast cancer. Semin. Oncol., 23: 506-528, 1996.[Medline]
  2. Scott A. M., Cebon J. Clinical promise of tumour immunology. Lancet., 349(Suppl.2): 19-22, 1997.
  3. Pegram M. D., Lipton A., Hayes D. F., Weber B. L., Baselga J. M., Tripathy D., Baly D., Baughman S. A., Twaddell T., Glaspy J. A., Slamon D. J. Phase II study of receptor-enhanced chemosensitivity using recombinant humanized anti-p185HER2/neu monoclonal antibody plus cisplatin in patients with HER2/neu-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer refractory to chemotherapy treatment. J. Clin. Oncol., 16: 2659-2671, 1998.[Abstract]
  4. Hakomori S. General concept of tumor-associated carbohydrate antigens: their chemical, physical and enzymatic basis Oettgen H. F. eds. . Gangliosides and Cancer, : 93-102, VHC Publishers Weinheim, Germany 1989.
  5. Hellström I., Garrigues H. J., Garrigues U., Hellström K. E. Highly tumor-reactive, internalizing, mouse monoclonal antibodies to Ley-related cell surface antigens. Cancer Res., 50: 2183-2190, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Pastan I., Lovelace E. T., Gallo M. G., Rutherford A. V., Magnani J. L., Willingham M. C. Characterization of monoclonal antibodies B1 and B3 that react with mucinous adenocarcinomas. Cancer Res., 51: 3781-3787, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Steplewski Z., Lubeck M. D., Scholz D., Loibner H., McDonald Smith J., Koprowski H. Tumor cell lysis and tumor growth inhibition by the isotype variants of MAb BR55-2 directed against Y oligosaccharide. In Vivo, 5: 79-83, 1991.[Medline]
  8. Theodoulou M., Gilewski T. A., Welt S., Garin-Chesa P., Stockert E., Kitamura K., Steplewski Z., Koprowski H., Norton L., Old L. J. Anti-Lewis Y (LeY) monoclonal antibody (mAb) BR55-2 (IgG2a) in patients with advanced breast cancer. Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol., 13: 299 1994.
  9. Schlimok G., Pantel K., Loibner H., Fackler-Schwalbe I., Riethmuller G. Reduction of metastatic carcinoma cells in bone marrow by intravenously administered monoclonal antibody: towards a novel surrogate test to monitor adjuvant therapies of solid tumours. Eur. J. Cancer, 31A: 1799-1803, 1995.[CrossRef]
  10. Tolcher A. W., Sugarman S., Gelmon K. A., Cohen R., Saleh M., Isaacs C., Young L., Healey D., Onetto N., Slichenmyer W. Randomized phase II study of BR96-doxorubicin conjugate in patients with metastatic breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol., 17: 478-484, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Scott A. M., Geleick D., Rubira M., Clarke K., Nice E. C., Smyth F. E., Stockert E., Richards E. C., Carr F. J., Harris W. J., Armour K. L., Rood J., Kypridis A., Kronina V., Murphy R., Lee F-T., Liu Z., Kitamura K., Ritter G., Laughton K., Hoffman E., Burgess A. W., Old L. J. Construction, production, and characterization of humanized anti-Lewis Y monoclonal antibody 3S193 for targeted immunotherapy of solid tumors. Cancer Res., 60: 3254-3261, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Kitamura K., Stockert E., Garin-Chesa P., Welt S., Lloyd K. O., Armour K. L., Wallace T. P., Harris W. J., Carr F. J., Old L. J. Specificity analysis of blood group Lewis-y (Ley) antibodies generated against synthetic and natural Le(y) determinants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91: 12957-12961, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Clarke K., Lee F-T., Brechbiel M. W., Smyth F. E., Old L. J., Scott A. M. In vivo biodistribution of a humanized anti-Lewis Y monoclonal antibody (hu3S193) in MCF-7 xenografted BALB/c nude mice. Cancer Res., 60: 4804-4811, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. DeNardo S. J., Kukis D. L., Kroger L. A., O’Donnell R. T., Lamborn K. R., Miers L. A., DeNardo D. G., Meares C. F., DeNardo G. L. Synergy of Taxol and radioimmunotherapy with yttrium-90-labeled chimeric L6 antibody: efficacy and toxicity in breast cancer xenografts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94: 4000-4004, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. DeNardo S. J., Richman C. M., Kukis D. L., Shen S., Lamborn K. R., Miers L. A., Kroger L. A., Perez E. A., DeNardo G. L. Synergistic therapy of breast cancer with Y-90-chimeric L6 and paclitaxel in the xenografted mouse model: development of a clinical protocol. Anticancer Res., 18: 4011-4018, 1998.[Medline]
  16. King D. J., Antoniw P., Owens R. J., Adair J. R., Haines A. M. R., Farnsworth A. P. H., Finney H., Lawson A. D. G., Lyons A., Baker T. S., Baldock D., Mackintosh J., Gofton C., Yarranton G. T., McWilliams W., Shochat D., Leichner P. K., Welt S., Old L. J., Mountain A. Preparation and preclinical evaluation of humanised A33 immunoconjugates for radioimmunotherapy. Br. J. Cancer, 72: 1364-1372, 1995.[Medline]
  17. Levenson A. S., Jordan V. C. MCF-7: the first hormone-responsive breast cancer cell line. Cancer Res., 57: 3071-3078, 1997.[Free Full Text]
  18. Huseby R. A., Maloney T. M., McGrath C. M. Evidence for a direct growth-stimulating effect of estradiol on human MCF-7 cells in vivo. Cancer Res., 44: 2654-2659, 1984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Inaba M., Kobayashi T., Tashiro T., Sakurai Y., Maruo K., Ohnishi Y., Ueyama Y., Nomura T. Evaluation of antitumor activity in a human breast tumor/nude mouse model with a special emphasis on treatment dose. Cancer (Phila.)., 64: 1577-1582, 1989.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Hunter W. M., Greenwood F. C. Preparation of iodine-131 labeled growth hormone of high specific radioactivity. Nature (Lond.), 194: 495 1962.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Nikula T. K., Curcio M. J., Brechbiel M. W., Gansow O. A., Finn R. D., Scheinberg D. A. A rapid, single vessel method for preparation of clinical grade ligand conjugated monoclonal antibodies. Nucl. Med. Biol., 22: 387-390, 1995.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Lindmo T., Boven E., Cuttitta F., Fedorko J., Bunn P. A., Jr. Determination of the immunoreactive fraction of radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies by linear extrapolation to binding at infinite antigen excess. J. Immunol. Methods, 72: 77-89, 1984.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Bailey M. J., Smith I. E. Correlation between experimentally and clinically demonstrated activity of two new cytotoxic agents in breast cancer. Anticancer Res., 5: 419-422, 1985.[Medline]
  24. Scott A. M., Welt S. Antibody-based immunological therapies. Curr. Opin. Immunol., 9: 717-722, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Tschmelitsch J., Barendswaard E., Williams C., Jr., Yao T-J., Cohen A. M., Old L. J., Welt S. Enhanced antitumor activity of combination radioimmunotherapy (131I- labeled monoclonal antibody A33) with chemotherapy (fluorouracil). Cancer Res., 57: 2181-2186, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Peterson J. A., Blank E. W., Ceriani R. L. Effect of multiple, repeated doses of radioimmunotherapy on target antigen expression (breast MUC-1 mucin) in breast carcinomas. Cancer Res., 57: 1103-1108, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Siegel J. A., Pawlyk D. A., Lee R. E., Sasso N. L., Horowitz J. A., Sharkey R. M., Goldenberg D. M. Tumor, red marrow, and organ dosimetry for 131I-labeled anti-carcinoembryonic antigen monoclonal antibody. Cancer Res., 50: 1039s-1042s, 1990.[Medline]
  28. Sharkey R. M., Motta-Hennessy C., Pawlyk D., Siegel J. A., Goldenberg D. M. Biodistribution and radiation dose estimates for yttrium- and iodine-labeled monoclonal antibody IgG and fragments in nude mice bearing human colonic tumor xenografts. Cancer Res., 50: 2330-2336, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Giuliani F. C., Zirvi K. A., Kaplan N. O. Therapeutic response of human tumor xenografts in athymic mice to doxorubicin. Cancer Res., 41: 325-335, 1981.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
D. E. Milenic, K. Garmestani, E. D. Brady, K. E. Baidoo, P. S. Albert, K. J. Wong, J. Flynn, and M. W. Brechbiel
Multimodality Therapy: Potentiation of High Linear Energy Transfer Radiation with Paclitaxel for the Treatment of Disseminated Peritoneal Disease
Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2008; 14(16): 5108 - 5115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Y. Zhang, L. Xiang, R. Hassan, and I. Pastan
Immunotoxin and Taxol synergy results from a decrease in shed mesothelin levels in the extracellular space of tumors
PNAS, October 23, 2007; 104(43): 17099 - 17104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. P. Kelly, F. T. Lee, K. Tahtis, F. E. Smyth, M. W. Brechbiel, and A. M. Scott
Radioimmunotherapy with {alpha}-Particle Emitting 213Bi-C-Functionalized trans-Cyclohexyl-Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic Acid-Humanized 3S193 Is Enhanced by Combination with Paclitaxel Chemotherapy
Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2007; 13(18): 5604s - 5612s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. M. Scott, N. Tebbutt, F.-T. Lee, T. Cavicchiolo, Z. Liu, S. Gill, A. M.T. Poon, W. Hopkins, F. E. Smyth, C. Murone, et al.
A Phase I Biodistribution and Pharmacokinetic Trial of Humanized Monoclonal Antibody Hu3s193 in Patients with Advanced Epithelial Cancers that Express the Lewis-Y Antigen
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2007; 13(11): 3286 - 3292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
H. Farhan, C. Schuster, M. Klinger, E. Weisz, G. Waxenecker, M. Schuster, V. Sexl, G. C. Mudde, M. Freissmuth, and R. Kircheis
Inhibition of Xenograft Tumor Growth and Down-Regulation of ErbB Receptors by an Antibody Directed against Lewis Y Antigen
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2006; 319(3): 1459 - 1466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
R. M. Sharkey and D. M. Goldenberg
Targeted Therapy of Cancer: New Prospects for Antibodies and Immunoconjugates
CA Cancer J Clin, July 1, 2006; 56(4): 226 - 243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
M. P. Kelly, F. T. Lee, F. E. Smyth, M. W. Brechbiel, and A. M. Scott
Enhanced Efficacy of 90Y-Radiolabeled Anti-Lewis Y Humanized Monoclonal Antibody hu3S193 and Paclitaxel Combined-Modality Radioimmunotherapy in a Breast Cancer Model
J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2006; 47(4): 716 - 725.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
D. M. Goldenberg, R. M. Sharkey, G. Paganelli, J. Barbet, and J.-F. Chatal
Antibody Pretargeting Advances Cancer Radioimmunodetection and Radioimmunotherapy
J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2006; 24(5): 823 - 834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
F. T. Lee, A. J. Mountain, M. P. Kelly, C. Hall, A. Rigopoulos, T. G. Johns, F. E. Smyth, M. W. Brechbiel, E. C. Nice, A. W. Burgess, et al.
Enhanced Efficacy of Radioimmunotherapy with 90Y-CHX-A''-DTPA-hu3S193 by Inhibition of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Signaling with EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor AG1478
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2005; 11(19): 7080s - 7086s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
R. M. Sharkey and D. M. Goldenberg
Perspectives on Cancer Therapy with Radiolabeled Monoclonal Antibodies
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2005; 46(1_suppl): 115S - 127S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
D. V. Gold, K. Schutsky, D. Modrak, and T. M. Cardillo
Low-Dose Radioimmunotherapy (90Y-PAM4) Combined with Gemcitabine for the Treatment of Experimental Pancreatic Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2003; 9(10): 3929S - 3937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
P. A. Burke, S. J. DeNardo, L. A. Miers, K. R. Lamborn, S. Matzku, and G. L. DeNardo
Cilengitide Targeting of {alpha}v{beta}3 Integrin Receptor Synergizes with Radioimmunotherapy to Increase Efficacy and Apoptosis in Breast Cancer Xenografts
Cancer Res., August 1, 2002; 62(15): 4263 - 4272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
A. Lovqvist, J. L. Humm, A. Sheikh, R. D. Finn, J. Koziorowski, S. Ruan, K. S. Pentlow, A. Jungbluth, S. Welt, F. T. Lee, et al.
PET Imaging of 86Y-Labeled Anti-Lewis Y Monoclonal Antibodies in a Nude Mouse Model: Comparison Between 86Y and 111In Radiolabels
J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2001; 42(8): 1281 - 1287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
R. B. Luwor, T. G. Johns, C. Murone, H-J. S. Huang, W. K. Cavenee, G. Ritter, L. J. Old, A. W. Burgess, and A. M. Scott
Monoclonal Antibody 806 Inhibits the Growth of Tumor Xenografts Expressing Either the de2-7 or Amplified Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) but not Wild-Type EGFR
Cancer Res., July 1, 2001; 61(14): 5355 - 5361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, K.
Right arrow Articles by Scott, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, K.
Right arrow Articles by Scott, A. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research