Clinical Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sirotnak, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kris, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sirotnak, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kris, M. G.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 6, 3705-3712, September 2000
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research


Experimental Therapeutics, Preclinical Pharmacology

Co-administration of Probenecid, an Inhibitor of a cMOAT/MRP- like Plasma Membrane ATPase, Greatly Enhanced the Efficacy of a New 10-Deazaaminopterin against Human Solid Tumors in Vivo1

F. M. Sirotnak2, H. Guido Wendel, William G. B. Bornmann, William P. Tong, Vincent A. Miller, Howard I. Scher and Mark G. Kris

Program of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics [F. M. S., H. G. W., W. P. T., W. G. B. B.], and Department of Medicine [H. I. S., V. A. M., M. G. K.], Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Earlier studies from this laboratory have shown that the uricosuric agent probenecid (PBCD) will inhibit the extrusion of folate analogues from tumor cells mediated by a plasma membrane ATPase resembling the canicular multispecific organic anion transporter/multidrug resistance-related protein (MRP) family of ATP binding cassette transporters. This inhibition of this outwardly directed membrane ATPase has been shown to have a favorable impact upon the cellular pharmacokinetics, cytotoxicity, and efficacy of methotrexate in vivo. In an extension of these earlier studies, which had focused only on murine ascites tumors, we now report that parental co-administration of PBCD will also enhance net intracellular accumulation in vitro and intracellular persistence in vivo of a new folate analogue, 10-propargyl-10-deazaaminopterin (PDX) in tumor cells. This resulted in marked enhancement of the efficacy of PDX against murine and human lung neoplasms and human prostate and mammary neoplasms growing as solid tumors in mice. As possible ATPases targeted by PBCD, all of these tumors expressed MRP-1, -4, and -7 genes, with expression of MRP-4 being greatest in each case. Four other MRP genes were expressed to a variable extent in some tumors but not others. The therapeutic enhancement of PDX by PBCD was manifested as tumor regression, where PDX alone was only growth inhibitory (A549 NSCL tumor), or as a substantial increase (3–4-fold) in overall regression and/or number of complete regressions (Lewis and LX-1 lung, PC-3 and TSU-PR1 prostate, and MX-1 mammary tumors) compared to PDX alone. Also, only in the case of PDX with PBCD, a significant number of mice transplanted with LX-1 or MX-1 tumors that experienced complete regression did not have regrowth of their tumor. In view of these results, clinical trials of this therapeutic modality appear to be warranted, especially in the case of new more efficacious folate analogues that are also permeants for this canicular multispecific organic anion transporter/MRP-like plasma membrane ATPase.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The internalization of folate analogues by tumor cells is mediated (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2 ) by the one-carbon, reduced folate transporter. This transporter has recently been shown (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8) to be encoded by the RFC-1 gene. Although this mobile carrier is capable of mediating (1 , 2) bidirectional flux of these analogues, their net intracellular accumulation in tumor cells is limited (9, 10, 11, 12, 13) by their extrusion via one or more outwardly directed plasma membrane ATPases, most likely a member or members (14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27) of the cMOAT3 /MRP family. The properties of ATPase-mediated efflux of folate analogues in L1210 cells have been described (13) in some detail in work from our laboratory. However, the exact identity of this ATPase within this family of ABC cassette transporters has yet to be revealed.

Earlier studies from our laboratory have also shown (12 , 13 , 28) that the ATPase in tumors cells, retrospectively found to be responsible for the outward extrusion of MTX through the plasma membrane, is inhibited by a number of structurally different pharmacological agents. One of these, the uricosuric agent PBCD, was shown to significantly increase net intracellular accumulation of MTX in tumor cells when added along with the folate analogue to the culture medium. Although PBCD will also inhibit (12 , 28) internalization of MTX by the one-carbon, reduced folate transporter, it is a markedly better inhibitor of the plasma membrane ATPase operative in these cells that extrudes this folate analogue. As a consequence of this differential in inhibition, the cytotoxicity of MTX was increased severalfold by the addition of PBCD to the culture medium. Other earlier (29) studies extended these observations to in vivo systems, wherein the co-administration of PBCD with MTX was shown to significantly enhance the efficacy of this folate analogue against L1210 and Sarcoma 180 ascites tumors.

The current studies further extend these earlier findings in the following manner. Although our earlier (29) studies provided proof-of-principle for the notion that improved efficacy of folate analogues can be obtained by co-administration of PBCD, these studies were carried out with murine ascites tumor models. Growth of these tumors i.p. as ascites cell suspensions in mice may have been uniquely amenable to this type of pharmacological modulation. For this reason, the current studies focused on a variety of murine and human solid tumor models in mice, all of which express several members of the cMOAT/MRP family of ATPases. Also, these studies were carried out using the newest clinical candidate (PDX) among a group of 10deazaaminopterin analogues with antitumor efficacy in these model systems substantially greater (30) than that produced by MTX or any other analogue in the group, including edatrexate (10-ethyl-10-deazaaminopterin). We now report on these studies, which used in vivo models of murine and human lung and human breast and prostate tumors.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
A549, TSU-PR1, and PC-3 tumor cells were maintained in culture in RPMI supplemented with fetal bovine serum. The methodology used for maintaining these cells in culture and for examining the effect of PBCD on the cytotoxicity of MTX and PDX during pulse exposure to these agents has been provided in our earlier reports (28 , 30, 31, 32) . The tumors used during the in vivo studies were obtained from the National Cancer Institute Developmental Therapeutics Program (human MX-1 mammary carcinoma and LX-1 lung tumor), the American Type Culture Collection (human A549 NSCL, TSU-PR1, and PC-3 prostate tumors), and the Southern Research Institute (Lewis lung carcinoma). The Lewis lung tumor and the human tumors were maintained by s.c. transplantation in BD2F1 and athymic NCR-nu mice, respectively. After tumor growth, a cell suspension in RPMI was prepared from the excised tumor, centrifuged for 5 min at 1000 x g, and the pellet was resuspended in RPMI complete medium with 10% FCS. For A549 and the prostate tumors, an equal volume of Matrigel (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) was used to suspend the cell pellet. Aliquots of tumor cell suspension were implanted s.c. at the suprascapular region in a group of mice, and 3–5 days later, the mice, now bearing tumors 5–6 mm in diameter, were randomized among control and the various treated groups. The MTDs of PBCD in combination with MTX or PDX were determined in preliminary experiments comparing the effect of varying doses of PBCD given i.p. with 45 mg of MTX or 60 mg/kg PDX i.p. on a schedule of once every 3–4 days for a total of 4 doses. These doses resulted in less than 10% weight loss and no toxic deaths. The average tumor diameter (two different axes of the tumor were measured) was measured in control and treated groups by caliper 2–5 days after cessation of treatment. The data are expressed as the increase or decrease in tumor volume (mm3 = 4/3{pi}r3 ). Statistical analysis was carried out by the {chi}2 method (33) . Other methodological details are provided in earlier reports (29 , 30) of similar studies from this laboratory. Working solutions of PBCD, MTX, and PDX were prepared in PBS (0.14 M NaCl plus 0.01 M sodium phosphate, pH 7) by adjusting to pH 7 with 1 N NaOH. These solutions were held frozen at –20°C for no longer than 2 weeks. These studies were performed in accordance with the NIH Principles of Laboratory Animal Care (34) .

PDX was synthesized at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Its purity was established (35) as greater than 97% by high performance liquid chromatography. PBCD was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. BD2F1 and NCR-nu (AT) mice were purchased from Sprague Dawley (Madison, WI). PDX was formulated as a sodium salt in 0.9% NaCl and 0.9% benzyl alcohol (pH 7). PBCD was formulated in distilled H2O as a sodium salt (pH 7.8).

Methodologies used for carrying out experiments measuring the effect of PBCD on the cellular pharmacokinetics of PDX in vitro and the pharmacokinetics of PDX in tumor and plasma in vivo have been described in considerable detail in an earlier (32) report. The analysis of tissue and plasma content of PDX and its polyglutamates with time after the administration of this folate analogue have also been described (31 , 36) . A similar methodology was used for determining the plasma concentration of PBCD. Specific experimental details for both in vitro and in vivo experiments are provided in the legends of the appropriate figures.

The relative level of expression of the different MRP genes was determined by semiquantitative RT-PCR. Total cellular RNA was prepared from frozen tumors by the TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD). Ten µg of RNA were reverse transcribed in a 20-µl reaction using oligo-dT primers and Superscript II RT according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Life Technologies, Inc.). PCR was done using 2 µl of cDNA in a 100-µl reaction containing 2.5 units of Taq Polymerase, 10 µl of 10x PCR buffer without MgCl2, 0.2 mM each dNTP, 1.5 mM MgCl2, and 0.5 µl of each primer (Life Technologies, Inc.). The following primers were used. MRP-1: sense, 5'-GAC TTC ACC AAG TGC TTT CAG AAC-3', antisense, 5'-GTA GAA GTA GCC CTG CCA GTC T-3'; MRP-2: sense, 5'-CAT CTG CCA TTC GAC ATG ACT GC 3', antisense, 5'-CAC ATT CCG AGT TTT CAA GGA GT-3'; MRP-3: sense, 5'-CCA AGG CAG AGG GTG AGA TCT C-3', antisense, 5'-GCT TGA TGC GCG AGT CCT TCA AT-3'; MRP-4: sense, 5'-GAA GAC CCG CTC ACA GCA CCT TG-3', antisense, 5'-CTG ACA CCC TCT CAA TGG CTG A-3'; MRP-5: sense, 5'-AAG TGT GAG GGA GAG AAC CAG C-3', antisense, 5'-CTC GCG CCA TTT TTT GAA CAC TCT G-3'; MRP-6: sense, 5'-GGT GTC GTA GAC TCA AGT TCC TC-3', antisense, 5'-GAG GAA GAG TGC GTA GAG GCA G-3'; MRP-7: sense, 5'-GGG CAC CTA CAG GTT TGA GGA G-3', antisense, 5'-GAG AAC TCT GCA GGG TGT GGA TT-3'. (GenBank accession numbers were as follows: MRP-1, NM_004996; MRP-2, NM_000392; MRP-3, NM_003786; MRP-4, NM_005845; MRP-5, NM_005688; MRP-6, NM_001171; MRP-7, U66684). Cycling conditions included an initial 3-min denaturation at 94°C, followed by 40 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 45 s at 55°C, and 1 min at 72°C. A final extension was carried out at 72°C for 10 min. In a parallel reaction, ß-actin was used as a standard (sense primer, 5'-CAT GGG TCA GAA GGA TTC CTA TG-3'; antisense primer, 5'-GTT GAA GGT CTC AAA CAT GAT CTG-3'). The linear range of the reaction was determined in experiments using different cDNA concentrations and cycle numbers. To determine any contamination by genomic DNA, the cDNA reaction mixture without reverse transcriptase was included in the PCR (data not shown).


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Preliminary Considerations.
Other earlier studies from our laboratory have shown (35, 36, 37) that most analogues among a wide variety of pteridinyl, quinazolinyl, and pyridopyrimidinyl folate analogues are similarly effective as permeants for extrusion by a cMOAT/MRP-like ATPase in tumor cells. Among the 4-amino folate analogues, the 10-deazaaminopterins were equivalent (36, 37, 38) to aminopterin and MTX as permeants. In the context of the current studies, we have shown (Table 1)Citation that PDX is markedly more cytotoxic than MTX and significantly more cytotoxic than EDX during a 3-h pulse exposure against all four human tumors (A549, NSCL, and TSU-PR1, and PC-3 prostate) studied in cell culture. In the presence of 1 mM PBCD, PDX was substantially more cytotoxic (5–10-fold) than PDX alone. Therefore, the net cytotoxicity of PDX plus PBCD was, on average, >2 log orders and >1 log order in magnitude higher than MTX alone and EDX alone, respectively. It was these observations made in cell culture and in earlier in vivo experiments (30) that motivated our pursuit of the in vivo studies described below. In the earlier in vivo experiments (30) , the efficacy of PDX against some of the tumor models (MX-1 and LX-1) used here was extremely high. Complete regression and no evidence of tumor regrowth was obtained in a large percentage of the animals treated once with PDX for 5 consecutive days. For this reason and to allow for the most straightforward demonstration of improved efficacy of PDX plus PBCD over PDX alone, a different schedule of administration was used, and the experiment made more challenging by delaying treatment until the average tumor size was 5 mm or greater.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 The effect of PBCD on the cytotoxicity of PDX in cell culture

Tumor cells (5 x 102 cells/ml) were exposed to different concentrations of PDX and 1 mM PBCD for 3 h at 37°C. After removal of medium, the cells were resuspended in medium with 1 mM PBCD and reincubated at 37°C for 3–5 days. Shown is the average of three experiments ± SE.

 
Cellular Pharmacokinetics Studies in Vitro and in Vivo.
Based upon our earlier (28 , 29) studies with MTX and PBCD against murine ascites tumors, we assumed that any improvement in the antitumor efficacy of PDX obtained in the present studies by co-administration of PBCD results from a favorable pharmacokinetics effect in the target tumors that is achieved by inhibition of a resident cMOAT/MRP ATPase. This appears to be a reasonable assumption because the 10-deazaaminopterins, like all pteridine folate analogues (38) , including MTX, are effective permeants for ATPase-mediated efflux from tumor cells. To provide direct support for this assumption in the context of the present studies, we carried out the following experiments. In Fig. 1Citation , we show the effect of PBCD on the net accumulation of PDX at steady-state in A549, PC-3, and TSU-PR1 cells. These cells lines were chosen for these experiments because they are among the tumors used in the current studies that will grow in culture. The time course data in Fig. 1Citation document a potent concentration-dependent effect of PBCD in increasing net accumulation of PDX in each case. These results with these solid human lung and prostate tumors are similar to that which we obtained (28) earlier using MTX and PBCD in murine tumor cells. Although some inhibition of internalization of PDX was also observed (Fig. 1)Citation , these results reflect a substantially greater inhibitory effect of PBCD on the extrusion of this and other folate analogues (12 , 28) compared to its effect on mediated influx. Overall, these results are consistent with the results of the cytotoxicity studies given in Table 1Citation .



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Time courses for the net intracellular accumulation of PDX at steady state in the presence and absence of PBCD in A549, PC-3, and TSU-PR1 cells. Cells were incubated with 2 µM PDX in transport buffer (pH 7.5) at 37°C with and without 0.1 or 0.5 mM PBCD. Aliquots of cells were removed for processing at the times indicated. Additional experimental details are given in the text. The data are an average of three experiments, with a SE of <14%.

 
In related in vivo experiments, we examined the pharmacokinetics of PDX in plasma and in the PC-3 tumor after the administration of 60 mg/kg of the antifolate with and without 125 mg/kg PBCD. This dose of PBCD was shown (Ref. 29 and below) to be the maximum dose of PBCD that could be given without toxicity to mice with an MTD of PDX on a schedule of once every 3–4 days for a total of 4 doses. Also, after the administration of this dose, a maximum plasma concentration of >0.5 mM of PBCD was achieved (data not shown) within the first 10 min. The data in Fig. 2Citation show that co-administration of PBCD resulted in a somewhat lower rate of plasma clearance of PDX within the first 2–3 h, but within the next 5–6 h, the rate of clearance was increased over that found in mice receiving PDX alone. These results are virtually the same as that obtained with MTX with and without PBCD in our earlier (29) studies. Related data on the pharmacokinetics of PDX in the PC-3 tumor are given in Fig. 3Citation . These data show that the persistence of freely exchangeable PDX (both parent and polyglutamated forms) in intracellular water of tumor was substantially greater in mice treated with PDX and PBCD than those treated with PDX alone. In this case, the 2-fold greater level of intracellular PDX seen initially in the PBCD-treated mice was increased to greater than 5-fold within 3–7 h and remained, albeit at a somewhat lower level, elevated compared to mice treated with PDX alone for at least 24 h. These data and the related data on the cellular pharmacokinetics of PDX with and without PBCD (Fig. 1)Citation clearly show that the enhancement in net accumulation of PDX observed in this tumor in the PBCD-treated animals occurred as a result of its effects at the cellular level. It is reasonable to assume that similar results would be obtained with other tumors used in the current studies.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Plasma pharmacokinetics for PDX in mice receiving PDX with or without PBCD. Athymic mice bearing the PC-3 tumor were given 60 mg/kg PDX i.p. with or without 125 mg/kg PBCD, and blood plasma was collected at varying times thereafter. The data shown are from a representative experiment using two mice per data point.

 


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Pharmacokinetics for PDX in the PC-3 tumor implanted in athymic nude mice. Tumor-bearing mice were given 60 mg/kg PDX i.p. with or without 125 mg/kg of PBCD i.p., and after collection of plasma (see legend of Fig. 2Citation ), the tumor was excised, blotted to remove excess moisture, and weighed. The tumors were disrupted and held for 15 min in cold (0–4°C) 0.14 M NaCl plus 0.01 M potassium phosphate (pH 7) to allow for removal of PDX from the extracellular space. The cells were washed once with the same solution by centrifugation and resuspension. The tumor cells were resuspended to a final volume of 2 ml and heated in a boiling water bath in a sealed tube for 10 min. After being cooled to ice bath temperature, the solids were centrifuged at 10,000 x g, and the supernatant was collected and recentrifuged at 12,000 x g in a microcentrifuge. The clarified supernatant was analyzed for PDX content by high performance liquid chromatography (20) .

 
Relative Expression Levels of cMOAT/MRP Genes among the Test Tumors.
Because cMOAT/MRP ATPase are the likely targets of PBCD in tumor, it was of interest to determine the extent, if any, to which identified cMOAT/MRP genes (14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27) were actually expressed in the tumors to be used in our in vivo studies. Determinations of relative expression levels for a total of seven genes in this family were carried out by semiquantitative RT-PCR. These included MRP-1, -2 (cMOAT), -3 (MOAT-D or cMOAT-2), -4 (MOAT-B), -5 (MOAT-C or SMRP), -6 (MOAT-E), and -7. The sources of total RNA for these PCRs were human lung (LX-1 and A549), prostate (PC-3 and TSU-PR1), and breast (MX-1) tumors xenografted to nude mice. The results of these studies are given in Fig. 4Citation and show a markedly different pattern of relative expression for these genes among the tumors examined. Only MPR-1, -4, and -7 were expressed at detectable levels in all five tumors. Among these three genes, MRP-4 was consistently expressed at the highest level. In addition, MRP-2 was highly expressed in both lung tumors (LX-1 ~= A549) and to a lesser extent in the prostate tumors (PC-3 > TSU-PR1). There was some expression of MRP-3 in A549 and to a lesser extent in TSU-PR1. Some expression of MRP-5 occurred in PC-3, and MRP-5 was expressed to a lesser extent in A549 and TSU-PR1. Finally, low levels of expression of MRP-6 were seen in A549 and TSU-PR1.



View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Semiquantitative RT-PCR determination of cMOAT/MRP gene expression in human lung, prostate, and mammary tumor xenografts in nude mice. ß-Actin gene expression was used as a control to normalize these PCRs. The data are representative of replicate runs.

 
In Vivo Antitumor Studies.
Experiments were first carried out in non-tumor-bearing mice to determine the maximum dose of PBCD that could be given i.p. with PDX at its MTD on the schedule of administration that was to be used in these studies, once every 3–4 days for a total of 4 doses. The data showed (Fig. 5)Citation that at doses of PBCD of 125 mg/kg or below, there was no increase in toxicity in either BD2F1 or NCR-nu mice compared to that seen with PDX alone. Higher doses of PBCD with PDX resulted in a significant increase (P < 0.01) in toxic deaths. These results were similar to that obtained earlier (29) with MTX, when PDX was given with and without PBCD to BD2F1 mice on a different schedule (once every 2 days for a total of 5 doses) of administration.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Toxicity dose-response for PBCD given with 10-propargyl-10-deazaaminopterin at its MTD. The schedule of administration was four times every 3–4 days i.p. See text for further details.

 
Using the dosages and schedule of administration found above to be well tolerated, a large series of experiments was carried out in mice bearing either a murine tumor or one of five human tumors. In the case of the murine Lewis lung tumor, experiments were carried out in BD2F1 mice comparing MTX and PDX given i.p. either alone or with PBCD i.p. at the MTD for each agent or the combination. The data showed (Table 2)Citation that PBCD was essentially without effect on the growth of this relatively chemoresistant tumor. They also show that whereas the effect of MTX was minimal on tumor growth, PDX was substantially more active, inhibiting tumor growth by more than 90%. Despite this extreme difference in relative antitumor properties of these folate analogues, co-administration of PBCD with these analogues appreciably improved their efficacy against this tumor. MTX with PBCD was 5-fold more effective than MTX alone (P < 0.01) in inhibiting tumor growth, and PDX with PBCD was at least severalfold more effective than PDX alone (P < 0.005), causing major regression of the tumor; 4 of 12 tumor-free mice were observed only with the combination.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2 Treatment of the Lewis lung tumor with folate analogues with or without simultaneous PBCD

Treatment initiated i.p. 4 days postimplantation using 1 dose given every 3–4 days for a total of 4 doses. Additional details were provided in the text. Shown are the results of three experiments with four mice per group done on separate days.

 
Extremely favorable results were also obtained (Table 3)Citation with PDX and PBCD compared to PDX alone when given i.p. during the treatment of human lung, prostate, and mammary tumors in NCR-nu mice. In these experiments, PBCD alone was without effect (data not shown). Although the relative efficacy of PDX against these tumors varied substantially, co-administration of PBCD with this new folate analogue consistently increased its efficacy to a significant extent. Treatment of mice bearing the LX-1 tumor resulted in more regression (P < 0.05) and a 3-fold increase (P < 0.01) in the number of complete regressions compared to that seen with PDX alone. Also, 4 of 12 of these animals showed no regrowth of tumor. A similar increase in efficacy was obtained (Table 3)Citation against the A549 NSCL tumor. Although less responsive to PDX than the LX-1 tumor, co-administration of PBCD with this folate analogue resulted in some tumor regression, whereas PDX alone was only growth inhibitory. Data obtained with the human prostate tumors (Table 3)Citation were also consistent with these results. Whereas PDX alone brought about some regression of the PC-3 and TSU-PR1 tumors, PDX with PBCD resulted in substantially more regression and tumor free-mice. A striking result was obtained with the MX-1 mammary carcinoma. This tumor was extremely responsive to PDX, which induced major tumor regression and a substantial number of tumor-free mice. However, the co-administration of PBCD with PDX resulted in nearly complete regression of the tumor, and 75% (P < 0.01) of the mice compared to 25% with PDX alone were tumor-free after treatment. Moreover, in 5 of 12 of the PDX plus PBCD-treated mice, there was no regrowth of the tumor.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3 Treatment of human lung, prostate, and mammary tumors with PDX with or without simultaneous PBCD

Treatment was initiated on a schedule of one dose every 3–4 days for a total of 4 doses i.p. 4 days posttransplantation. Tumor size measurement 2–4 days posttreatment. Shown are the results of two or three experiments with three or four mice per group. See text for additional details.

 
The results of these experiments substantially extend our prior (29) findings with MTX and PBCD. They show that the co-administration of PBCD will also improve the efficacy of a classical folate analogue with inherently greater antitumor potency (30) than MTX. They also show that established, s.c. implanted, solid tumors are equally responsive to this form of modulation therapy as ascites tumors (29) growing i.p. in mice. Thus, the potential for PDX with PBCD in the common clinical setting focusing on metastatic solid tumors would appear to be high. Given that PBCD is already commercially available and used by patients with a variety of medical needs, the clinical development of this regimen of therapy for patients with neoplastic disease should be relatively facile and straight forward. However, in view of the potential for PBCD to alter plasma clearance of PDX as well as other classical folate analogues (39 , 40) by inhibiting multispecific anion transport systems in the liver and kidney, caution will be needed during the planning and conduct of Phase I trials of this agent, which should also include a pharmacokinetic component. Although similar concerns did emerge during the initial (29) in vivo studies with MTX, they proved to be unwarranted, at least in the context of these animal model systems. In that case and in the present study, PBCD actually brought about (29) more rapid clearance of MTX and PDX from plasma probably by preferentially inhibiting reabsorption in the kidney.

The current studies extend our earlier (29) work, which was the first known example in animal model systems of the successful pharmacological modulation of a cytotoxic agent as an approach to the improvement of therapy of neoplastic disease. It emerged from basic studies conducted in this laboratory (9 , 10) and subsequently elsewhere (11) that identified a role for an ATP-dependent efflux process in limiting net intracellular accumulation of folate analogues in tumor cells. Subsequent (13) studies from our laboratory identified this process as mediated by an outwardly directed ATPase and further confirmed the potential merit of seeking agents that inhibit this process in tumor cells. To this end, the studies described here are mechanism-based and would appear to provide a sound rationale for clinical trials testing this therapeutic modality in patients.

The role of specific members of the cMOAT/MRP family of ATPases in mediating outward transport of folate analogues from tumor cells is controversial. Of the seven family members of this ABC cassette of transporters identified (14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27) , overexpression of MRP-1, -2, -3, and -4 after transfection has been associated (21, 22, 23 , 27) with enhanced efflux and acquired resistance of tumor cells to MTX. However, the identity of the resident ATPase(s) that extrude MTX or other folate analogues in untransfected, drug-naive tumor cells has yet to be directly documented. Based upon the overlapping specificity of these ATPases reported (14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27) , it is likely that all identified members of this family, once overexpressed, are able to mediate efflux of folate analogues. This notion would appear to be consistent with the findings of our own studies, described herein, which documented consistent expression of some of these ABC cassette family members but not others among five human tumors. It seems probable that the effects of PBCD on the efficacy of PDX documented in our studies relates to the action of this agent (17 , 23) on one or more of these cMOAT/MRP ATPases. Based upon our own analysis of their gene expression (Fig. 4)Citation in the test tumors, the ATPase encoded by MRP-4 would be a likely target with MRP-1 and -7 ATPases as additional probable targets. However, further work on molecular and cellular pharmacokinetic aspects will be required to shed additional light on this question.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported in part by National Cancer Institute Grants CA08748 and CA56517, the Simon Benlevy Cancer Fund, and the Pepsico Foundation. Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Laboratory for Molecular Therapeutics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021. Phone: (212) 639-7952; Fax: (212) 794-4342; E-mail: sirotnaf{at}mskcc.org Back

3 The abbreviations used are: ABC, ATP binding cassette; cMOAT, canicular multispecific organic anion transporter; PBCD, probenecid; MTD, maximum tolerated dose; MTX, methotrexate; EDX,10-ethyl-10-deazaaminopterin cedatrexate); PDX, 10-propargyl-10-deazaaminopterin; MRP, multidrug resistance-related protein; NSCL, non-small cell lung. Back

Received 10/ 4/99; revised 6/ 6/00; accepted 6/ 7/00.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Sirotnak F. M. Obligate genetic expressing in tumor cells of a fetal membrane property mediating folate transport: biological significance and implications for improved therapy of human cancer. Cancer Res., 45: 3992-4000, 1985.[Free Full Text]
  2. Goldman, I. D., and Matherly, L. H. The cellular pharmacology of methotrexate. In: I. D. Goldman (ed.), Membrane Transport of Antineoplastic Agents. International Encyclopedia of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Vol. 118, pp. 283–302. Oxford, United Kingdom: Pergamon Press, 1986.
  3. Dixon K. H., Lanpher B. C., Chiu J., Kelly K., Cowan K. H. A novel cDNA restores reduced folate carrier activity and methotrexate sensitivity to transport deficient cells. J. Biol. Chem., 269: 17-20, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Williams F. M. R., Murrary R. C., Underhill T. M., Flintoff W. F. Isolation of a hamster cDNA clone coding for a function involved in methotrexate uptake. J. Biol. Chem., 269: 5810-5816, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Wong S. C., Proefke S. A., Bhushan A., Matherly L. H. Isolation of human cDNAs that restore methotrexate sensitivity and reduced folate carrier activity in methotrexate transport-defective Chinese hamster ovary cells. J. Biol. Chem., 270: 17468-17475, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Williams F. M. R., Flintoff W. F. Isolation of a human cDNA that complements a mutant hamster cell defective in methotrexate uptake. J. Biol. Chem., 270: 2987-2992, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Prasad P. D., Ramamoorthy S., Leibach F. H., Ganapathy V. Molecular cloning of the human placental folate transporter. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 206: 681-687, 1995.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Moscow J. A., Gong M., He R., Sgagias M. K., Dixon K. H., Anzick S. L., Meltzer P. S., Cowan K. H. Isolation of a gene encoding a human reduced folate carrier (RFC1) and analysis of its expression in transport-deficient, methotrexate-resistant human breast cancer cells. Cancer Res., 55: 3790-3794, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Dembo M., Sirotnak F. M. Antifolate transport in L1210 leukemia cells. Kinetic evidence for the non-identity of carriers for influx and efflux. Biochem. Biophys. Acta., 448: 505-516, 1976.
  10. Dembo M., Sirotnak F. M., Moccio D. M. Effects of metabolic deprivation on methotrexate transport in L1210 leukemia cells: further evidence for separate influx and efflux systems with different energetic requirements. J. Membr. Biol., 78: 9-17, 1984.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Henderson G. B., Zevely E. M. Transport routes utilized by L1210 cells for the influx and efflux of methotrexate. J. Biol. Chem., 259: 1526-1231, 1984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Sirotnak F. M., O’Leary D. F. The issues of transplant multiplicity and energetics pertaining to methotrexate efflux in L1210 cells addressed by an analysis of cis and trans effects of inhibitors. Cancer Res., 51: 1412-1417, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Schlemmer S. R., Sirotnak F. M. Energy dependent efflux of methotrexate in L1210 leukemia cells. Evidence for the role of an ATPase obtained with inside-out plasma membrane vesicles. J. Biol. Chem., 267: 14746-14752, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Saxena M., Henderson G. B. ATP-dependent efflux of 2,4-dinitro phenyl-S-glutathione. Properties of two distinct transport systems in inside-out vesicles from L1210 cells and a variant subline with altered efflux of methotrexate and cholate. J. Biol. Chem., 270: 5312-5319, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Kool M., de Haas M., Scheffer G. L., Scheper R. J., Van Eijk M. J., Juijn J. A., Baas F., Borst P. Analysis of expression of cMOAT (MRP2), MRP3, MRP4, and MRP5, homologues of the multidrug resistance associated protein gene (MRP1) in human cancer cell lines. Cancer Res., 57: 3537-3547, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Cole S. P., Bhardivaj G., Gerlach J. H., Mackie J. E., Grant C. E., Alinquist K. C., Stewart A. J., Kurz E. U., Duncan A. M., Deeley R. G. Overexpression of a transporter gene in a multidrug-resistant human lung cancer cell line. Science (Washington DC), 258: 1650-1654, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Saxena M., Henderson G. B. MOAT-4, a novel multispecific organic-anion transporter for glucuronides and mercapturates in mouse L1210 cells and human erythrocytes. Biochem. J., 320: 273-281, 1996.
  18. Lee K., Belinsky M. G., Bell D. W., Testa J. R., Kruh G. D. Isolation of MOAT-B, a widely expressed multidrug resistance-associated protein/canicular multispecific organic anion transporter-related transporter. Cancer Res., 58: 2741-2747, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Kool M., Van der Linden M., de Haas M., Baas F., Borst P. Expression of human MRP6, a homologue of the multidrug resistance protein MRP1, in tissues and cancer cells. Cancer Res., 59: 175-182, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Masuda M., I’izuka Y., Yamazaki M., Nishigaki R., Kato Y., Ni’inuma K., Sezuki H., Sukiyama Y. Methotrexate is excreted in the bile by canicular multispecific organic anion transporter in rats. Cancer Res., 57: 3506-3510, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Hao Z., Bain L. J., Belinsky M. G., Kruh G. D. Expression of multidrug resistance protein 3(multispecific organic transporter-b) in human embryonic kidney 293 cells confers resistance to anticancer agents. Cancer Res., 59: 5964-5967, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Belinsky M. G., Bain L. J., Balsara B. B., Testa J. R., Kruh G. D. Characterization of MOAT-C and MOAT-D, new members of the MRP/cMOAT subfamily of transport proteins. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 90: 1735-1741, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Hooijberg J. H., Broxterman H. J., Kool M., Asseraf Y. G., Peters G. J., Nordhius P., Scheper R. J., Borst P., Pinedo H. M., Jansen G. Antifolate resistance mediated by the multidrug resistance proteins MRP1 and MRP2. Cancer Res., 59: 2532-2535, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Suzuki, T., Nishio, K., Sasaki, H., Kurokawa, H., Saito-Ohara, F., Ikeuchi, T., Masaaki, T., and Saijo, N. cDNA cloning of a short type of multidrug resistance protein homologue. SMRP, from a human lung cancer cell line. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 238: 790–794, 1997.
  25. Borst P., Evers R., Kool M., Wijnholds J. The multidrug resistance protein family. Biochem. Biophys. Acta., 161: 347-357, 1999.
  26. Kao H. H., Huang J. D. Isolation of a new transporter gene from human small intestine. Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res., 41: 803 2000.
  27. Lee K., Klein-Szanto A., Kruh G. D. Expression of Mrp-4 (MOAT-B) in NIH3T3 cells confers resistance to methotrexate and the anti-AIDS drug PMEA. Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res., 41: 677 2000.
  28. Sirotnak F. M., Moccio D. M., Young C. W. Increased accumulation of methotrexate by murine tumor cells in vitro in the presence of probenecid which is mediated by a preferal inhibition of efflux. Cancer Res., 41: 966-970, 1981.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Sirotnak F. M., Moccio D. M., Hancock C. A., Young C. W. Improved methotrexate therapy of murine tumors obtained by probenecid-mediated pharmacological modulation at the level of membrane transport. Cancer Res., 41: 3944-3949, 1981.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Sirotnak F. M., DeGraw J. I. , Colwell, and Piper, J. R. A new analogue of 10-deazaaminopterin with markedly enhanced curative effects against human tumor xenografts in mice. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., 42: 313-318, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Samuels L. L., Moccio D. M., Sirotnak F. M. Similar differential for total polyglutamylation and cytotoxicity among various folate analogues in human and murine tumor cells in vitro. Cancer Res., 45: 1488-1495, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Sirotnak F. M. Correlates of folate analog transport, pharmacokinetics and selective antitumor action. Pharmacol. Ther., 8: 71-103, 1980.
  33. Zar, J. H. Biostatistical Analysis, 2nd Ed., pp. 145–146. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1984.
  34. NIH. Principles of Laboratory Animal Care. NIH Publ. No. 85-23. Bethesda, MD: NIH, 1985.
  35. Kinahan J. J., Samuels L. L., Farag F., Fanucchi M. P., Vidal M. V., Sirotnak F. M., Young C. W. Fluorometic HPLC analysis of 10-deazaaminopterin, 10-ethyl-10-deazaaminopterin and known metabolites. Anal. Biochem., 150: 203-213, 1985.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Sirotnak F. M., DeGraw J. I., Moccio D. M., Samuels L. L., Goutas L. J. Folate analogs of the 10-deaza-aminopterin series. Basis for structural design and biochemical and pharmacologic properties. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., 12: 18-25, 1994.[Medline]
  37. Sirotnak F. M., DeGraw J. I. Selective antitumor action of folate analogues Sirotnak F. Burchall J. J. Ensminger W. D. Montgomery J. A. eds. . Folate Antagonists as Therapeutic Agents, 2: 43-91, Academic Press New York 1984.
  38. Schlemmer S. R., Sirotnak F. M. Structural preferences among folate compounds and their analogues for ATPase-mediated efflux by inside-out plasma membrane vesicles derived from L1210 cells. Biochem. Pharmacol., 29: 1427-1433, 1995.
  39. Aherne G. W., Piall E., Marks V., Mould G., White W. F. Prolongation and enhancement of serum methotrexate concentrations by probenecid. Br. Med. J., 1: 1097-1099, 1978.
  40. Lilly M. B., Omura G. A. Clinical pharmacology of oral intermediate-dose methotrexate with or without probenecid. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., 15: 220-222, 1985.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
R. G. Deeley, C. Westlake, and S. P. C. Cole
Transmembrane Transport of Endo- and Xenobiotics by Mammalian ATP-Binding Cassette Multidrug Resistance Proteins.
Physiol Rev, July 1, 2006; 86(3): 849 - 899.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
P. Wielinga, J. H. Hooijberg, S. Gunnarsdottir, I. Kathmann, G. Reid, N. Zelcer, K. van der Born, M. de Haas, I. van der Heijden, G. Kaspers, et al.
The Human Multidrug Resistance Protein MRP5 Transports Folates and Can Mediate Cellular Resistance against Antifolates
Cancer Res., May 15, 2005; 65(10): 4425 - 4430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
D. Steinbach, S. Wittig, G. Cario, S. Viehmann, A. Mueller, B. Gruhn, R. Haefer, F. Zintl, and A. Sauerbrey
The multidrug resistance-associated protein 3 (MRP3) is associated with a poor outcome in childhood ALL and may account for the worse prognosis in male patients and T-cell immunophenotype
Blood, December 15, 2003; 102(13): 4493 - 4498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
A. Nzila, E. Mberu, P. Bray, G. Kokwaro, P. Winstanley, K. Marsh, and S. Ward
Chemosensitization of Plasmodium falciparum by Probenecid In Vitro
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 2003; 47(7): 2108 - 2112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
D. Steinbach, J. Lengemann, A. Voigt, J. Hermann, F. Zintl, and A. Sauerbrey
Response to Chemotherapy and Expression of the Genes Encoding the Multidrug Resistance-associated Proteins MRP2, MRP3, MRP4, MRP5, and SMRP in Childhood Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2003; 9(3): 1083 - 1086.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sirotnak, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kris, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sirotnak, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kris, M. G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online