
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates |
Institute of Clinical Pathology [P. B., H. K., G. B., G. O.] and Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics [A. O., M. S.], University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is widely accepted that the invasion of tumor cells into blood and lymphatic vessels is one of the critical steps for the establishment of metastasis (6) . One of the shortcomings of previous morphological studies is the fact that it is almost impossible to exactly differentiate between blood and lymphatic vessel invasion in H&E-stained sections. Therefore, immunohistochemistry has been proposed as an investigative tool (7) . Blood vessels can be reliably identified by immunostaining, e.g., for factor VIII-related antigen (7) , with only some lymphatic endothelia staining weakly. Until recently, no reliable marker for lymphatic vessels in paraffin-embedded specimens was available (8 , 9) . With a polyclonal antibody recognizing podoplanin (10) , it is now possible to selectively stain lymphatic vessels (11) .
Podoplanin is a Mr
38,000
membrane mucoprotein that was originally detected on the surface of rat
glomerular epithelial cells (podocytes) and was found to be linked to
flattening of foot processes that occurs in glomerular diseases
(12)
. Podoplanin shows features of a membrane mucoprotein
with several conserved O-glycosylation sites. Currently, it
is of unknown biological function (10)
. Because heavily
O-glycosylated mucoproteins were identified recently as
counterreceptors for selectins that mediate adhesion of inflammatory
cells (13)
, it is possible that podoplanin plays a similar
role in lymphatic endothelia (10)
.
In the present study, we present data on the prognostic value of lymphatic and blood vessel invasion in samples of cervical cancers of Union International Contre Cancer classification pT1b (clinically visible lesion confined to the cervix). Blood and lymphatic vessels were differentiated by immunostaining for podoplanin and factor VIII-related antigen.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Immunohistochemistry.
Rabbit antihuman podoplanin IgG was raised against the recombinant
human homologue of the rat Mr 43,000
glycoprotein podoplanin as described previously (10)
.
Affinity purification of rabbit serum was performed using
nitrocellulose strips containing recombinant protein (14)
.
Histological slides, 4 µm in thickness, were deparaffinized in xylol. Slides were heated in 0.01 M citrate buffer for 16 min in a microwave oven. After cooling for 20 min and washing in PBS, endogenous peroxidase was blocked with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 15 min, followed by incubation with PBS containing 10% normal goat serum for 30 min. For immunohistochemical detection of podoplanin, specimens were incubated at room temperature with the polyclonal rabbit antibody in a dilution of 1:2000 for 1 h. Immunohistochemical detection of factor VIII-related antigen was performed on a separate slide from the same block using a polyclonal rabbit antibody (BioGenex, San Ramon, CA) according to a standard protocol (4) . Detection of positive staining for both antigens was performed using the ChemMate kit (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) and 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole (BioGenex, San Ramon, CA) for podoplanin immunostaining and diaminobenzidine for factor VIII immunostaining. Counterstaining was performed using hematoxylin. A tissue block of breast cancer with a high microvessel density served as a positive control. The specimen has already been used in previous studies (4 , 15) . The negative control slide was prepared from the same tissue block. Instead of the primary antibody, a nonimmune serum was applied. All slides were investigated by one single pathologist (P. B.) blinded to the cases to prevent any interindividual classification errors. Lymphovascular space involvement in immunostained slides was considered positive if at least one tumor cell cluster was clearly visible in a decorated lymphovascular space (16) . Because factor VIII-related antigen is also weakly expressed on a few lymphatic vessels (17) , stained areas were only considered blood vessels, when they were clearly and strongly decorated by the antibody (7) . Furthermore, results of factor VIII and podoplanin staining of consecutive sections were compared, allowing exact classification of the labeled vessels. For comparison, lymphovascular space involvement was determined in routinely H&E-stained slides. In this setting, differentiation between blood and lymphatic vessel was not attempted.
Statistical Methods.
Correlation of vessel infiltration and lymph node status, histological
grading, and tumor size was tested using the
2
test or Mann-Whitney test, as appropriate. In patients with recurrent
disease, the influence of lymphatic and/or blood vessel invasion on the
localization of recurrent disease (local or distant) was computed by a
regression model.
OS2 was defined as the period from primary surgery until the death of the patient. Death from any other cause than cervical cancer or survival until the end of the observation period was considered an event to be censored. DFS was defined as period in between the end of the primary therapy and the first evidence of progression of disease. Univariate analysis of survival was performed as outlined by Kaplan and Meier (18) . The Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis. Age, lymph node status, grading, lymphovascular invasion, and tumor size (bulky versus nonbulky) were entered into Cox regression.
For all tests, P of
0.05 was considered significant.
All Ps given are results of two-sided tests.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2
test revealed a
significant association of lymphatic vessel infiltration and lymph node
involvement (P < 0.001); 65.7% of patients with
lymphatic vessel invasion had positive lymph nodes. In contrast, no
correlation of blood vessel invasion and lymph node involvement was
found (P = 0.182; Table 2
|
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our study revealed that 35.7% of the tumors showed lymphatic vessel invasion. This is in good correlation with the findings of Sakuragi et al. (6) , who found lymphatic vessel invasion in 37.267.6%, depending on the stage of the disease. In 26.5% of cases, we observed blood vessel invasion, which is slightly more than in the study by Sakuragi et al. (6) , who observed blood vessel invasion in 21% of samples in H&E-stained specimens (6) . One shortcoming of the work of Sakuragi et al. (6) was, however, that differentiation between vessel types was determined by normal light microscopy using histomorphology. Therefore, these data had to be confirmed by studies using markers that are specific for lymphatic vessels, as also suggested by the authors themselves (6) .
Other investigators studied lymphovascular space involvement in H&E-stained sections without differentiation between blood and lymphatic vessel invasion. Whereas some found lymphovascular space involvement as a prognostic factor in multivariate analysis (19 , 20) , others did not (21 , 22) . We suggest that, at least in part, the lower capability to detect invasion of microvessels in H&E-stained specimens and a possible influence of the investiagtors skill on the rate of detection of lymphovascular invasion might explain these differing results.
The comparison of specimens with or without lymphovascular space
invasion detection in H&E-stained sections with findings in
immunohistochemistry revealed that
33% of cases were incorrectly
classified in our study. Comparison with data in the literature
revealed that the percentage of lymphovascular space invasion (33.7%)
is comparable with that observed by others in H&E-stained sections.
Although in various studies results it ranged from 6%
(23)
to 63% (24)
, lymphovascular space
invasion was usually found in 2030% (25)
. Our results
show that data based on lymphovascular space invasion determined in
H&E-stained sections have to be interpreted with care.
Sakuragi et al. (6) reported a significant influence of blood vessel invasion on OS, but no influence of lymphatic vessel invasion on OS was found (6) . Analysis of DFS had not been performed by these authors (6) . In our study, multivariate analysis revealed that both blood and lymphatic vessel invasion did not have a significant influence on OS, but blood vessel invasion was significantly associated with shorter DFS. This is of particular interest, because in our patient population all patients who developed recurrence also died of their disease. Lymphatic vessel invasion was significantly associated with lymph node involvement. This explains the finding that lymphatic vessel invasion lost its prognostic significance in multivariate analysis, including lymph node status. We showed here for the first time that in a setting with unknown lymph node status, lymphatic vessel invasion becomes an independent prognostic factor, with patients showing a significantly shortened DFS despite the early stage of cervical cancer. This is of potent clinical importance. In cases where primary irradiation instead of radical hysterectomy of early-stage cervical cancer is intended or lymph node status could not be evaluated, immunostaining for podoplanin might deliver additional information because of the strong correlation between lymphatic vessel invasion and lymph node involvement and might serve as a basis for further therapeutic decisions.
In conclusion, both lymphatic vessel and blood vessel invasion occur frequently in early-stage cervical cancer. Determination of the vessel status is considered to be of clinical importance because both blood and lymphatic vessel invasion are markers for high risk of recurrence.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, at Institute of Clinical Pathology, University of Vienna,
Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. Phone:
43-1-40400-3650; Fax: 43-1-4053402; E-mail: peter.birner{at}akh-wien.ac.at ![]()
2 The abbreviations used are: OS, overall
survival; DFS, disease-free survival. ![]()
Received ; revised 10/19/00; accepted 10/26/00.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. S. Lim, F. Alexander-Sefre, M. Allam, N. Singh, J. C. Aleong, H. Al-Rawi, and I. J. Jacobs Clinical Value of Immunohistochemically Detected Lymphovascular Space Invasion in Early Stage Cervical Carcinoma Ann. Surg. Oncol., September 1, 2008; 15(9): 2581 - 2588. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Miyata, S. Kanda, K. Ohba, K. Nomata, Y. Hayashida, J. Eguchi, T. Hayashi, and H. Kanetake Lymphangiogenesis and Angiogenesis in Bladder Cancer: Prognostic Implications and Regulation by Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors-A, -C, and -D Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2006; 12(3): 800 - 806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y Nakamura, H Yasuoka, M Tsujimoto, K Kurozumi, M Nakahara, K Nakao, and K Kakudo Importance of lymph vessels in gastric cancer: a prognostic indicator in general and a predictor for lymph node metastasis in early stage cancer J. Clin. Pathol., January 1, 2006; 59(1): 77 - 82. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M M Vleugel, R Bos, P van der Groep, A E Greijer, A Shvarts, H V Stel, E van der Wall, and P J van Diest Lack of lymphangiogenesis during breast carcinogenesis J. Clin. Pathol., July 1, 2004; 57(7): 746 - 751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. P. Padera, Y. Boucher, R. K. Jain, L. M. Wein, P. E. Holden, and D. H. Kirn Correspondence re: S. Maula et al., Intratumoral Lymphatics Are Essential for the Metastatic Spread and Prognosis in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. Cancer Res., 63: 1920-1926, 2003. Cancer Res., December 1, 2003; 63(23): 8555 - 8557. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F Alexander-Sefre, N Singh, A Ayhan, H B Salveson, G Wilbanks, and I J Jacobs Detection of tumour lymphovascular space invasion using dual cytokeratin and CD31 immunohistochemistry J. Clin. Pathol., October 1, 2003; 56(10): 786 - 788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. F. Schoppmann, P. Birner, J. Stockl, R. Kalt, R. Ullrich, C. Caucig, E. Kriehuber, K. Nagy, K. Alitalo, and D. Kerjaschki Tumor-Associated Macrophages Express Lymphatic Endothelial Growth Factors and Are Related to Peritumoral Lymphangiogenesis Am. J. Pathol., September 1, 2002; 161(3): 947 - 956. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Jain and T. P. Padera Prevention and Treatment of Lymphatic Metastasis by Antilymphangiogenic Therapy J Natl Cancer Inst, June 5, 2002; 94(11): 785 - 787. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Schindl, G. Oberhuber, A. Obermair, S. F. Schoppmann, B. Karner, and P. Birner Overexpression of Id-1 Protein Is a Marker for Unfavorable Prognosis in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Cancer Res., August 1, 2001; 61(15): 5703 - 5706. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Birner, M. Schindl, A. Obermair, G. Breitenecker, and G. Oberhuber Expression of Hypoxia-inducible Factor 1{{alpha}} in Epithelial Ovarian Tumors: Its Impact on Prognosis and on Response to Chemotherapy Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2001; 7(6): 1661 - 1668. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |