
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Experimental Therapeutics, Preclinical Pharmacology |
Second Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Tokushima, Tokushima 770-8503, Japan
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Results: The inhibition ratios of mediastinal lymph node metastasis were 86.2, 94, and 92.1% for 12 mg/kg body UFT, 17 mg/kg body UFT, and 10 mg/kg body CDDP, respectively. The administration of anticancer drugs prolonged the life span by 4.6 days (17 mg/kg body UFT) and 8 days (10 mg/kg body CDDP) in MST.
Conclusion: We demonstrated that UFT alone and CDDP alone suppressed mediastinal metastasis and prolonged the life span in our lymphogenous metastatic model. Regardless of the administration route and characteristics of anticancer drugs, cytostatic or cytotoxic, our model is capable of evaluating the inhibitory effect of drugs on lymphatic metastasis. This model should make an important contribution to our understanding of the mechanism and selection of drugs for antilymphatic metastasis in lung cancer.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, we used two anticancer drugs, CDDP and UFT. CDDP is usually administered by the i.v. route and is a cytotoxic agent. Up to the present time, it has been the most used anticancer drug in the chemotherapy for lung cancer. UFT is usually administered by the oral route and is a cytostatic agent. UFT is an antineoplastic drug combining uracil and tegafur (ftrafur; a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil) in a 4:1 molar ratio. It has been widely used in the postsurgical adjuvant setting in Japan. Recently, UFT has been reexamined in Europe and the United States because it offers the advantage of oral administration.
The purpose of this study was to assess the inhibitory action of UFT and CDDP on lymphatic metastasis, the prolongation of the life span in our lymphogenous metastatic model system using SCID mice, and to confirm that our metastatic model is extremely useful for the selection of anticancer drugs to inhibit lymphatic metastasis.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals.
Male SCID mice (6 weeks of age) with a CB-17 genetic background were purchased from CLEA Japan, Inc. (Tokyo, Japan). These mice had been raised from birth in a specific pathogen-free environment.
Cells.
Human lung cancer cell line Ma44 (squamous cell carcinoma) was kindly provided by Drs. Masuda and Takata (Osaka Prefectual Habikino Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Ref. 9
). An Ma44-3 cell line was cloned using the limiting dilution method in our laboratory. The Ma44-3 cell line was cultured in RPMI 1640 with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD) and maintained at 37°C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 in air.
Orthotopic Intrapulmonary Implantation Procedure.
As shown in our previous studies (8
, 9)
, Ma44-3 cells were harvested for implantation at 7080% confluence using 1 mmol/l EDTA (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Osaka, Japan) in PBS (Nissui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Toyko, Japan). The cells were washed in RPMI 1640 and resuspended to a final concentration of 2.0 x 106 cells/ml in RPMI 1640 containing 0.1% BSA (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany). The mice were fully anesthetized by ether inhalation. The experimental mice were placed in the right lateral decubitus position with all four limbs restrained. A 1-cm transverse incision was made in the left lateral skin just below the inferior border of the scapula of the SCID mouse. The muscles were separated from the ribs by sharp dissection, and the intercostal muscles were exposed. The left lung was visible through the intercostal muscles. A 30-gauge needle was inserted
5 mm into the lung through the intercostal muscle, and an inoculum of 2.0 x 106 tumor cells/ml with 400 µg/ml Matrigel (Collaborative Biomedical Products, Bedford, MA) was then dispersed into the left lung in a final volume of 10 µl (2.0 x 104 cells) of medium. The procedure required
1 min for completion and was performed easily. The skin incision was closed with 3-0 silk.
Assessment of the Inhibitory Effect on Tumor Growth and Toxicity of UFT and CDDP in the s.c. Implantation Model.
To determine the optimum dosage of UFT or CDDP, we used a s.c. implantation model. Ma44-3 tumor cells (2.0 x 105) were injected s.c. into the right groin of the mice. Twelve mice were divided into four groups (n = 3). The mice were p.o. administered 0, 12, 17, or 24 mg/kg body of UFT for 7 consecutive days beginning on day 5 after implantation. The control group (0 mg/kg body) received only CMC solution. Eighteen mice were divided into six groups (n = 3). The mice were i.p. administered 0, 3, 7, 10, 15, and 20 mg/kg body weight of CDDP on day 5 after implantation. The control group (0 mg/kg body weight) received only normal saline. After tumors appeared, the size of the tumors was determined twice a week by caliper measurements of the length and width. The tumor volume was calculated using the following formula:
![]() |
The body weight of each mouse was measured twice a week to monitor the toxicity of UFT and CDDP.
Assessment of the Inhibitory Effect of UFT and CDDP on Mediastinal Lymph Node Metastasis.
To investigate the inhibitory effect of UFT and CDDP on mediastinal lymph node metastasis, 27 mice orthotopically implanted with tumor cells were divided into four groups. The mice were p.o. administrated 0, 12, or 17 mg/kg body of UFT for 7 consecutive days beginning on day 5 after implantation (n = 7). In the control group (0 mg/kg body weight), only CMC solution was given. As a separate group, six mice were i.p. administered 10 mg/kg body weight of CDDP on day 5 after implantation. In our previous study, mediastinal lymph node metastasis was detected histologically on day 5 and detected macroscopically on day 9. The survival time of mice was 1418 days (9)
. The period of administration of UFT was therefore determined to be days 511, and the time of CDDP administration was determined to be on day 5 after implantation. The mice were sacrificed on day 14 by ether inhalation and cervical dislocation. The major organs (bilateral lungs, heart, liver, kidneys, adrenal glands, and mediastinal tissues) were removed and fixed in 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin. Five-µm histological sections were made from the mediastinal tissues at 300-µm intervals. The paraffin sections were stained with H&E and examined by microscope. To quantify the volume of mediastinal lymph nodes metastasized by Ma44-3 cells, we selected the slice that had the largest tumor foci in the mediastinal tissues in a low power field (x20) and calculated the area occupied by Ma44-3 tumor cells by NIH image.
Survival of Orthotopically Implanted Mice Treated with UFT and CDDP.
To examine the life-prolonging activity of UFT or CDDP in this lymphogenous metastatic model system, 26 mice with tumor cells orthotopically implanted were divided into two groups (n = 13). These mice were p.o. administrated 0 or 17 mg/kg body of UFT for 7 consecutive days from day 5 after implantation. Twenty mice with tumor cells orthotopically implanted were divided into two groups (n = 10). These mice were i.p. administered 0 or 10 mg/kg body of CDDP on day 5 after implantation.
All of the experimental protocols for this study were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Tokushima School of Medicine.
Statistical Analysis.
A one-factor ANOVA and Dunnetts t test were used for statistical analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to construct curves for overall survival, and a log-rank test was used to determine survival rates.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Effect of UFT on Tumor Growth Produced by s.c. Implantation of Ma44-3 Cells.
The changes in the mean volume of s.c. tumors are shown in Fig. 2a
. The volumes of the s.c. tumors treated with 0, 12, 17, and 24 mg/kg body of UFT were 7061 ± 2577 SD, 2353 ± 841 SD, and 1140 ± 275 SD on day 21 and 0 mm3 on day 14, respectively. The growth of s.c. tumors in the mice treated with 12, 17, and 24 mg/kg body of UFT was significantly suppressed as compared with that of the tumors in the mice not treated with UFT (P < 0.01). The inhibitory effect of UFT was dose dependent in the three treated groups, but the difference was not statistically significant.
|
Inhibitory Effect of UFT and CDDP on Mediastinal Lymph Node Metastasis.
The effective doses of UFT were determined from the s.c. implantation experiment to be 12 or 17 mg/kg. The effective doses of CDDP were determined from the s.c. implantation experiment to be 7 or 10 mg/kg. Ma44-3 tumor cells were injected into a lung of 27 mice. Twenty-one mice were p.o. administrated 0, 12, or 17 mg/kg body of UFT during days 511 after implantation (n = 7), and 6 mice were i.p. administered 10 mg/kg body weight of CDDP on day 5 after implantation.
In the control group, mediastinal lymph node metastasis was observed in 6 of 7 mice (86%). Two of them had bulky lymph nodes of the mediastinum (Fig. 3a)
, two showed metastases macroscopically, and two showed metastases microscopically. In the 12 mg/kg UFT group, 1 of the 7 mice showed mediastinal metastasis macroscopically, and 2 of the 7 mice showed mediastinal lymph node metastasis microscopically. Macroscopic or microscopic metastases were observed in 3 of 7 mice (43%). In the 17 mg/kg UFT group, mediastinal lymph node metastases were observed microscopically (Fig. 3b)
in 5 of 7 mice (71%). In the CDDP-treated group, 5 of 6 mice (83%) showed mediastinal lymph node metastases microscopically.
|
|
Life-prolonging Activity of UFT (Fig. 5a)
.
We next compared the life-prolonging activity in the mice treated with 17 mg/kg UFT with that in the mice without UFT in the lymphogenous metastatic model system (n = 13; Fig. 5a
). In the 0 mg/kg UFT (control) group, the first death occurred on day 12, and the MST was 15.8 days. In the 17 mg/kg UFT group, however, the first death occurred on day 15, and MST was 21.4 days. The mice treated with UFT showed a marked prolongation of survival as compared with the mice not treated with UFT (P < 0.01).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several authors have reported orthotopic implantation models in lung cancer (12, 13, 14, 15, 16) . There has been no lymphogenous metastatic orthotopically implanted model for lung cancer, however, and the detailed mechanism of lymphogenous metastasis remains unknown. Our laboratory has been pursuing studies involving the lymph node metastasis of lung cancer. We demonstrated previously the lymphogenous spread of human lung cancer in SCID mice using an orthotopic implantation model (8 , 9) . Our previous studies have microscopically clarified the process of lymphogenous metastasis: (a) anchoring in the lung; (b) flowing to the lymphatic vessels in perivascular and peribronchial space; and (c) metastasis to the mediastinum in the Ma44-3 lung cancer cell line in the period between days 3 and 15 after intrapulmonary implantation. Metastasis to the mediastinum in mice was never observed until day 3 after intrapulmonary implantation. It was first detected on day 5 microscopically and on day 9 macroscopically. The mediastinal lymph nodes became larger with the passage of time.
In this study, we examined the inhibitory effect on lymphatic metastasis of two anticancer drugs. UFT is a representative drug for oral administration and a cytostatic agent. CDDP is a representative drug for i.v. administration and a cytotoxic agent, which has been used recently as a key drug in many combination chemotherapeutic regimens in lung cancer. It was reported that the antitumor effect for NSCLC was 8.4% with UFT alone (17) and 12% (standard dose) to 14% (high dose) with CDDP alone (18) . Eagan et al. (19) first used CDDP in combination with other agents in a series of Phase II trials. Most Phase II studies indicate that patients treated with CDDP-based combination regimens have a modest but significant increase in survival as compared with patients who do not receive cisplatin. In Phase III Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trials, CDDP-based regimens are more effective than those that do not contain cisplatin (20 , 21) . UFT, which exhibits a cytostatic effect against tumor cells, has been used widely in the treatment of breast, gastrointestinal, head and neck, and lung cancers in Japan. Wada et al. (22) reported an adjuvant trial of 323 patients with all stages of completely resected NSCLC. They compared the life-prolonging effect of a single dose of UFT, concomitant UFT with CDDP plus Vindesine, and no treatment (control). The 5-year survival rates of the single-dose UFT group (64.1%) and the UFT plus CDDP and Vindesine group (60.6%) were significantly high as compared with the control group (49.0%). UFT could be an effective therapeutic opinion for adjuvant chemotherapy for NSCLC. In addition, because UFT is administered p.o. and well tolerated, it may provide a better quality of life and cost benefit for patients with advanced cancer.
Efficacy on mediastinal metastasis can be considered from two aspects. One is the effect on existing metastatic foci, and the second is the preventive effect on metastasis, which depends on the timing of the occurrence of metastasis and drug administration. This study demonstrated that the administration of anticancer drugs in the early phase of mediastinal lymph node metastasis could inhibit the development of lymph node metastasis and the swelling of lymph nodes, and that it prolonged the survival time of mice. Because our previous studies have revealed that lymph node metastasis of the mediastinum was detected beginning on day 5 after implantation in this model, the administration of anticancer drugs started on day 5 after implantation (9) . The inhibition ratios for mediastinal lymph node metastasis were 86.2, 94, and 92.1% for 12 mg/kg body weight UFT, 17 mg/kg body weight UFT, and 10 mg/kg body weight CDDP, respectively. Also, the administration of anticancer drugs prolonged survival by 4.6 days (17 mg/kg body weight UFT) and 8 days (10 mg/kg body weight CDDP) in MST.
The status of lymphatic metastasis in mice with 17 mg/kg body UFT on day 14 ( metastatic lesions in the mediastinum are detected microscopically) is similar to that in mice without UFT on day 5. The period of the administration of UFT is almost the same as that of the prolonged survival of mice treated with UFT. These results suggest that the administration of UFT for 7 days inhibited the lymphatic metastatic activity or the enlargement of the metastatic lesions in the mediastinum, and that the lymphatic metastatic activity recovered, or the metastatic lesions began to grow again after the administration of UFT was discontinued. Recent studies have reported that UFT suppresses tumor growth, tumor hematogenous metastasis, tumor angiogenesis (23 , 24) , the in vitro invasion activity of Matrigel, and cell detachment from the primary tumor (25) . We think that the inhibition of lymphatic metastasis in this study is attributable to multiple functions of UFT, such as its antigrowth, antiangiogenesis, anti-invasion, and anti-intravasation functions. Although further examination is needed to elucidate the mechanisms of inhibition of lymphatic metastasis, there is no doubt that UFT functions cause tumor dormancy.
Furthermore, micrometastasis of the mediastinum in mice treated with CDDP on day 14 is also similar to that in mice not treated with CDDP on day 5. The mice treated with CDDP showed survival prolongation of 8 days as compared with the mice without CDDP treatment. CDDP is effective in inhibiting the development of secondary metastatic growth (26) . These findings suggest that treatment with CDDP delays the progress of lymphatic metastasis of lung cancer.
It is well known that CDDP inhibits DNA synthesis and the division of tumor cells. Recently, it was reported that CDDP inhibited tumor angiogenesis directly (27) . However, it was reported previously that CDDP lacked antiangiogenic activity (28) . It therefore remains to be elucidated in detail whether CDDP has the ability to conduct antimetastatic activity.
In conclusion, we show that UFT alone and CDDP alone suppressed mediastinal metastasis and prolonged the life spans of mice in our lymphogenous metastatic model. Regardless of the administration routes, oral or i.p. (i.v.), and characteristics of anticancer drugs, cytostatic or cytotoxic, our model is capable of evaluating the inhibitory effect of lymphatic metastasis for drugs. This model should make an important contribution to our understanding of the mechanism and selection of drugs for antilymphatic metastasis in lung cancer.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Second Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Tokushima, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima City, Tokushima 770-8503, Japan. Phone: 81-88-633-7143; Fax: 81-88-633-7144; E-mail: kondo{at}clin.med.tokushima-u.ac.jp ![]()
2 The abbreviations used are: NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; SCID, severe combined immunodeficient; CDDP, cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (cisplatin); UFT, uracil-tegafur; CMC, carboxymethyl cellulose sodium salt; MST, mean survival time. ![]()
Received 3/ 6/01; revised 7/ 2/01; accepted 7/ 2/01.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Fujino, K. Kondo, H. Ishikura, H. Maki, H. Kinoshita, T. Miyoshi, Y. Takahashi, N. Sawada, H. Takizawa, T. Nagao, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor MMI-166 inhibits lymphogenous metastasis in an orthotopically implanted model of lung cancer Mol. Cancer Ther., September 1, 2005; 4(9): 1409 - 1416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Brabek, S. S. Constancio, P. F. Siesser, N.-Y. Shin, A. Pozzi, and S. K. Hanks Crk-Associated Substrate Tyrosine Phosphorylation Sites Are Critical for Invasion and Metastasis of Src-Transformed Cells Mol. Cancer Res., June 1, 2005; 3(6): 307 - 315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zou, H. Fu, S. Ghosh, D. Farquhar, and J. Klostergaard Antitumor Activity of Hydrophilic Paclitaxel Copolymer Prodrug Using Locoregional Delivery in Human Orthotopic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Xenograft Models Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2004; 10(21): 7382 - 7391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |