
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Experimental Therapeutics, Preclinical Pharmacology |
Gastrointestinal Oncology Research Laboratory, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine [M. M., C. J., M. A. S., G. K. S.], Program of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics [F. M. S., Y. S.], and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics [M. G.], Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The camptothecin CPT-11 is a topoisomerase I inhibitor that induces DNA damage and transient S-phase arrest (4 , 5) . Increased sensitivity to this agent has been observed in cells with defective checkpoints that prevent the cells from arresting in G2 after drug exposure (6) . Thus, the relative sensitivity of tumor cells to CPT-11 appears to depend, at least in part, on the absence or presence of intact checkpoints within the cell cycle.
It has been hypothesized that the damage by radiation or chemotherapy at physiological conditions does not induce sufficient stress to induce cell death. To enhance the therapeutic index, combinations of various drugs have been used in cancer therapy. For example, a synergy is observed when DC3F cells are treated with ionizing radiation and CPT-11 in a sequential manner (7) . It has been suggested that "sublethal" DNA damage of CPT-11 is converted into lethal damage by radiation-induced DNA damage. A similar phenomenon has been observed when CPT-11 is combined with 5-fluorouracil (8) . All of these studies have included the combination of conventional chemotherapeutic agents or radiation.
Flavopiridol, a CDK3 inhibitor, has been reported to bind to DNA and induce DNA damage (9) . Furthermore, it has been shown that the addition of flavopiridol to other "stress-inducing" agents promotes cytotoxicity and induces apoptosis (10 , 11) . Therefore, it stands to reason that in checkpoint-intact cells, the addition of flavopiridol to CPT-11 should produce a degree of damage that results in apoptosis rather than cell cycle arrest. In addition, we believe that any effect seen in vitro should also produce an enhanced antitumor effect in vivo that could not be achieved with CPT-11 or flavopiridol alone. Our studies indicated that the addition of flavopiridol to SN-38-treated Hct116 cells augments the induction of apoptosis and the inhibition of colony formation. Furthermore, the regression of established Hct116 xenografts obtained with CPT-11 was significantly increased with flavopiridol. Moreover, CRs were observed when CPT-11 and flavopiridol were given sequentially and separated by specific time intervals.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Colony Formation Assays.
Hct116 cells (8 x 105) were plated, in duplicate, in 60-mm plates and incubated for 24 h to allow cells to adhere. Cells were treated with various doses of SN-38 and flavopiridol alone for 24 h. At the end of treatment, both floating and attached cells were collected by trypsinization and centrifuged for 5 min. Cells were plated in triplicate at the density of 1000 cells/100-mm plate containing 10 ml of drug-free medium and were allowed to grow for 10 days. The resulting colonies were stained with 0.01% crystal violet for 30 min. Control plates usually contained 300350 colonies. Cells were also treated with various doses of SN-38 and a fixed flavopiridol dose in different schedules: concomitant treatment for 24 h; sequential treatment with SN-38 for 24 h followed by removal of the medium and the addition of medium containing flavopiridol for 24 h; or the two drugs given in reverse sequence. For sequential treatment, the floating cell were collected after treatment with the first drug and added back for treatment with the second drug. At the end of treatment, cells were trypsinized and plated to form colonies as above.
Apoptosis Assays.
Measurement of apoptosis by quantitative fluorescence microscopy was performed as described previously (10)
. The appearance of oligonucleosomal DNA fragmentation characteristic of apoptosis was determined by agarose gel electrophoresis. The cells were treated as above and lysed with 2% SDS containing 10 µg/ml RNase A and incubated at 37°C for 2 h. NaCl (5 M) was added to a final concentration of 1 M, and cells were scraped and stored at 4°C for 224 h. The lysed cells were centrifuged for 30 min at 12,000 rpm. DNA unassociated with intact chromatin residing in the supernatant was extracted by phenol-chloroform and precipitated with ethanol. DNA (10 µg) was resolved by agarose gel electrophoresis in 1x Tris-acetate-EDTA for 1 h on 1.5% agarose gel impregnated with ethidium bromide.
MPM-2/Propidium Iodide Bivariate Flow Cytometry.
Staining with MPM-2 antibody and propidium iodide was performed as described previously (10)
. In this method, MPM-2-positive (mitotic) cells show increased green fluorescence and are shifted above the baseline of the dot plot.
Kinase Activity Assay.
Cyclin B1/cdc2 kinase assays were performed as described previously (10)
. In brief, cyclin B1 was immunoprecipitated from 200 µg of lysate prepared from cells treated with various treatment conditions, and the kinase assay was performed with histone H1 as substrate and [
-32P]ATP as a phosphate donor. The activity levels on autoradiographs were quantified by a densitometric scanning system.
Western Analysis.
Western blots were prepared as described previously (10)
. The membranes were probed with p53, p21 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), PARP, and caspase-3 (PharMingen), and XIAP (Transduction Laboratories). The primary antibodies were detected with horseradish peroxide secondary antibody (Amersham Life Sciences) and subjected to ECL Chemiluminescence reagents (DuPont NEN Life Science Products, Boston, MA). The levels of expression were quantified by a densitometric scanning system.
Immunoprecipitation of Cyclin/CDK Complexes.
Cyclin B1 and E immunoprecipitation was performed as described previously in kinase assays (10)
. The beads were washed three times with lysis buffer and separated by SDS-PAGE, and Western analysis of bound proteins was performed as described above.
RNA Extraction and Northern Blot Analysis.
Total RNA was extracted from cells treated with different schedules of SN-38 and flavopiridol by a described previously cesium chloride method (12)
. Twenty µg of total RNA were electrophoresed on a 1% agarose-phosphate buffer gel and blotted onto Hybond-N nylon membranes (Amersham); the RNA was then cross-linked by UV Stratalinker (Stratagene). The membranes were hybridized with 32P-labeled p21 full-length cDNA probe (a gift from Dr. David Beach, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories, Cold Spring Harbor, NY) in Expresshyb hybridization solution (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA). The probe was labeled previously by random priming [32P]dCTP incorporation using a random-prime labeling kit (Amersham). The probe was purified by passing through Sephadex Quick Spin column (Boehringer Mannheim).
Nuclear Run-On Assays.
Nuclei were obtained, and assays were performed by a modification of previously described procedures (12)
. Briefly, 5 x 107 cells from each treatment condition were lysed in 2 ml of NP40 buffer [10 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 10 mM NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 0.5% NP40], and nuclei were harvested, resuspended in 110 µl of glycerol storage buffer [40% glycerol, 10 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 80 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA], and stored at -80°C. Forty µl of nuclear run-on buffer [20 mM Tris (pH 8), 0.6 M KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 2 mM each of ATP, GTP and CTP] and 10 µl of [32P]UTP (3000 Ci/mmol; NEN) were added to the nuclear suspension, and the transcription run-on reaction was allowed to proceed at 30°C for 30 min; the reaction was terminated with 40 µl of stop solution (300 units of DNase I, 1.5 M NaCl, 150 mM MgCl2, and 5 mM CaCl2) at 30°C for 5 min. One µl of proteinase K (20 mg/ml) and 25 µl of buffer [5% SDS, 50 mM EDTA, 100 mM Tris (pH 7.4)] were added and incubated for 30 min at 37°C. The newly formed RNA was extracted as described by Dai et al. (13)
. DNA dot blots with equal quantities of various linearized DNAs were prepared on nylon membranes. The DNA plasmids used included negative control (plasmid PUC), p21 full-length cDNA in pBluescript (a gift from Dr. David Beach), and positive control (a 400-bp fragment of GAPDH in pBluescript, isolated during subtraction hybridization in our laboratory). The prehybridization (1 h) and hybridization (18 h) were carried out in ExpressHyb at 65°C. The autoradiograph was obtained after 3 days of exposure of filters at -80°C.
Xenograft Growth Assay.
The general procedure used in the experiments has been described previously (14)
. Athymic-NCr-nu male mice (810 weeks of age) were inoculated s.c. in the flank with minced p21-intact Hct116 tumor cells mixed with Matrigel (Becton Dickinson). Treatment was started on the third day after the inoculation of tumor; mice were treated with the maximum tolerated dose of CPT-11 either as a single agent or in combination. The maximum tolerated dose of flavopiridol was used as a single agent and decreased in combination therapy to minimize the cytotoxicity. The average tumor volume at the day of treatment was 2729 mm3. Mice received CPT-11 alone (100 mg/kg), flavopiridol alone (11 mg/kg), or CPT-11 (100 mg/kg) followed by flavopiridol (3 mg/kg) 4, 7, 16, or 24 h later. Mice in the control group were given vehicle (PBS) alone. All drugs were administered i.p. twice a week for a total of five injections. Tumors were measured every 34 days with calipers, and tumor volumes were calculated by the formula: 4/3 x
x r3, where r = (larger diameter + smaller diameter)/4. The percentage of tumor regression was calculated as the percentage ratio of the difference between baseline and final tumor volume to the baseline volume. Mice showing no palpable tumor 45 days after treatment and mice with small residual tumor nodules that showed no microscopic evidence of residual disease were counted as CR. The percentage of CR was the number of animals with CR divided by the total number of animals treated, multiplied by 100. These studies were performed in accordance with NIH guidelines (15)
.
Biostatistical Analysis.
All in vitro experiments were done in duplicate and were repeated at least three times unless otherwise indicated. The statistical significance of the experimental results was determined by the two-sided t test. For in vivo studies, the area under the time-volume curve was used as a summary measure for each mouse. This area was calculated using the trapezoidal rule. This method takes the longitudinal aspect of the data into account and does not require assumptions of linear growth (or decay), which are clearly violated for our data. Treatment groups were compared in pairs, using the exact permutation distribution of the areas under the curve (16)
.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
ND24), both cell types accumulated in G2-M with 4n DNA content. At this stage, a significant difference was observed between the two cell lines. As shown in Fig. 2A
|
ND24) resulted in only 1% apoptosis. Flavopiridol for 24 h (F24) induced 12 ± 1% apoptosis. Sequential treatment of Hct116 cells with SN-38 for 24 h followed by flavopiridol for 24 h (SN24
F24) showed the highest induction of apoptosis (43 ± 0.5%; SN24
F24 versus SN24
ND24, P < 0.005). The pretreatment of cells with flavopiridol (F24
SN24) resulted in only an additive effect (15 ± 2%) compared with SN-38 or flavopiridol alone. Concomitant therapy [(SN+F)24] induced apoptosis in 30 ± 2% of the treated cells. The percentage of induction of apoptosis with SN24
F24 was significantly greater than that obtained with either the reverse sequence (SN24
F24 versus F24
SN24, P < 0.001) or concomitant therapy [SN24
F24 versus (SN+F)24, P < 0.05].
Gel electrophoretic analysis of DNA obtained from cells treated with various schedules of SN-38 and flavopiridol revealed more intense oligonucleosomal bands in cells treated with SN24
F24 compared with those treated with other drug schedules (Fig. 3A)
. In keeping with these observations, higher activation of caspase-3 (i.e., formation of 24-, 20-, and 17-kDa forms) was observed in cells treated with SN24
F24 compared with those with other treatment schedules (Fig. 3B)
. Cells treated with a combination of SN-38 and flavopiridol together for 24 h [(SN+F)24] also showed significant activation of caspase-3, albeit to a lesser degree, when compared with cells treated with SN24
F24. PARP, the 116-kDa caspase-3 substrate, was completely degraded into its 90-kDa cleaved product in cells treated sequentially with SN-38 followed by flavopiridol, further supporting the greater induction of apoptosis in this treatment schedule. In general, the trend was SN24
F24 > (SN+F)24 > F24 for the percentage of induction of apoptosis, caspase-3 activation, and PARP cleavage.
|
F24 treatment induced cell death, and cells detached from the plate. Clonogenic assays with p21-deficient cells also showed no colony formation, and these cells completely detached from the plate with SN-38 alone (data not shown).
|
F24], the levels of full-length XIAP (57 kDa) were reduced by 2030% (Fig. 5A
F24-treated cells compared with cells treated with flavopiridol alone, suggesting higher cleavage of XIAP.
|
ND24), protein expression of p21 was further induced 5-fold. The addition of flavopiridol to SN-38-treated cells (SN24
F24) inhibited the induction of p21 protein expression. In cells treated with flavopiridol and SN-38 concomitantly [(SN+F)24], protein expression was lower than that in cells treated with SN-38 alone. Thus, under all treatment schedules in which flavopiridol was added and cells underwent apoptosis, p21 protein expression was down-regulated.
|
ND24-treated cells. The binding of p21 to cyclin B1/cdc2 negatively regulated kinase activity, as shown by the decreased kinase activity of this complex in SN24
ND24-treated cells (Fig. 6B)
F24, which was associated with suppression of p21 expression, also inhibited kinase activity, presumably because of direct binding of flavopiridol to cdc2.
Flavopiridol Increases the Caspase-mediated Cleavage of p21 in Sequential Therapy.
To further understand the decrease in p21 protein expression in cells treated sequentially with SN-38 followed by flavopiridol, we studied the transcriptional and posttranslational changes in p21 expression in cells treated sequentially with SN-38 followed by flavopiridol. Total RNA was prepared from the Hct116 cells treated with the different schedules, and the Northern blot was probed with radiolabeled p21 cDNA. As shown in Fig. 7A
, after 24 h of SN-38 treatment, p21 mRNA levels were increased 5-fold compared with untreated cells. The addition of flavopiridol to SN-38-treated cells did not change the mRNA levels significantly. Similar results were obtained with the nuclear run-on assays (Fig. 7B)
.
|
(F+PS)24] prevented degradation of the p21 protein, and increased p21 protein levels were observed compared with SN24
F24-treated cells. However, the addition of PS-341 to SN-38-treated cells (SN24
PS24) also resulted in a similar increase in p21 protein levels (compare SN24
ND24 and SN24
PS24 in Fig. 8A
|
(F+z-DEVD)24 and SN24
(F+z-VAD)24] restored the protein expression of p21. z-VAD-fmk alone or z-VAD-fmk added to SN-38-treated cells (z-VAD24 and SN24
z-VAD24, respectively) did not change the levels of p21, when compared, respectively, with ND24 and SN24
ND24. More than 95% of PARP cleavage with SN-38 followed by flavopiridol was reversed by z-DEVD-fmk, indicating that PARP is preferentially cleaved by caspase-3 (Fig. 8C)
(F+z-VAD)24; Fig. 8C
Sequential Therapy with CPT-11 and Flavopiridol Augments Tumor Regression and CR in Xenografts.
The clonogenic and apoptosis assays indicated that sequential treatment with SN-38 followed by flavopiridol achieved the best results. To investigate whether these in vitro observations are also reflected in vivo and to optimize the time interval between the two drugs, we established p21-intact Hct116 cells as xenografts in nude mice. Mice were treated with either each drug alone or sequentially with CPT-11 followed by flavopiridol at 4-, 7-, and 16-h intervals. As shown in Table 1
and Fig. 9
, the interval between CPT-11 and flavopiridol was an important determinant of the percentage of tumor regressions in xenografts. The greatest tumor regression (the percentage of decrease in tumor volume) was observed when the interval between CPT-11 and flavopiridol was at least 716 h. Two weeks after the end of treatment (day 30), there was a 40 ± 25% regression of tumors in mice treated with CPT-11 alone, whereas in mice treated with CPT-11 followed by flavopiridol 7 and 16 h later, tumor regression was 86 ± 9% and 82 ± 5%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in response in mice treated with CPT-11 alone and CPT-11 followed by flavopiridol after 4 h. If the interval between CPT-11 and flavopiridol was increased to 24 h, the response rate was similar to that for CPT-11 alone (data not shown). Two of 10 mice and 1 of 7 mice treated with CPT-11 followed by flavopiridol at 7- and 16-h intervals, respectively, had no palpable tumors. We also examined the histology of any residual tissue mass remaining at the end of the treatment in different treatment groups. Despite the presence of a small palpable mass, one animal from each treatment group of CPT-11 followed by flavopiridol at 7 and 16 h showed no evidence of any tumor cells, indicating the complete pathological absence of tumor in these mice (Fig. 10)
. Thus, the CR rates for CPT-11 followed by flavopiridol at 7 and 16 h were 30% (3 of 10) and 29% (2 of 7), respectively. This was in contrast to CPT-11 alone or CPT-11 followed by flavopiridol at 4 h, where no CRs were found (Table 1)
.
|
|
|
Mice that were treated with only CPT-11 lost an average of 10 ± 1% of body weight, whereas mice treated with CPT-11 followed by flavopiridol at 7 and 16 h lost an average of 15 ± 2% and 11 ± 1% of body weight, respectively, suggesting that the 7-h interval was more toxic. Nevertheless, the weight loss by mice treated with CPT-11 alone and with CPT-11 followed by flavopiridol at 16 h was essentially identical. This would indicate that the difference in weight loss could not explain the significant difference in response rates for these treatment conditions. Furthermore, all mice gained weight after treatment, and the difference in the weight loss 2 weeks after completion of treatment was not different among all treatment conditions, indicating that the toxicity with the combination was temporary and within acceptable limits. None of the mice died as a result of the toxicity of either single-agent or combination therapy during the course of the experiment.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
G2 arrest by SN-38 is largely dependent on the checkpoint status of cells. Activation of the cyclin B1/cdc2 complex is the key regulator of G2-M transition (32) . The activation of this complex is required for G2 cells to enter M phase. It has been shown previously that in addition to directly inhibiting the cyclin B1/cdc2 complex, p21 also inhibits Thr161 phosphorylation of cdc2 to enforce the G2 DNA damage checkpoint (33) . Thus, the presence of p21 (and p53) exerts a stronger G2 arrest, as shown in parental Hct116 cells by cell cycle analysis and colony formation assays. The cell cycle changes induced by SN-38 followed by no drug and SN-38 followed by flavopiridol were similar in Hct116 cells. In cells treated sequentially with SN-38 followed by flavopiridol, although p21 protein levels were decreased, the cells were arrested in the G2 cell cycle phase and cyclin B1/cdc2 kinase activity was also inhibited. This degree of inhibition was independent of cyclin B1 protein expression because cyclin B1 protein levels were unchanged under all treatment conditions (data not shown). The cyclin B1/cdc2 kinase activity in the kinase assays was greater than we would have anticipated in intact cells treated with SN-38 followed by flavopiridol. During immunoprecipitation, flavopiridol gets displaced from the ATP-binding site of cdc2 and competes with ATP added during the kinase assays, producing an artificial increase in kinase activity (34 , 35) . Although both treatment conditions (i.e., SN-38 followed by no drug and SN-38 followed by flavopiridol) resulted in arrest of the cell cycle at G2, the end results of both treatments were different (i.e., SN-38 followed by no drug resulted in cell cycle arrest, whereas SN-38 followed by flavopiridol resulted in cell death). Thus, the difference between cell cycle progression and cell cycle arrest is not the mechanism by which the enhanced cytotoxicity observed with the combination of SN-38 and flavopiridol can be explained. Other mechanisms, including modulation of apoptotic pathways, are undoubtedly involved in this process.
We observed no change in the expression of proteins classically associated with apoptosis, including bcl2, bax, bcl-xL, bad, and bag. The search for other pathways showed increased cleavage of XIAP and p21 proteins. XIAP is an inhibitor of caspases and can be cleaved by caspases during apoptosis, thus rendering cells more sensitive to cell death (21
, 22)
. p21 is transcriptionally up-regulated after SN-38 treatment. The decrease in p21 appears to be attributable to a posttranslational effect. Both SN24
(F+PS)24 and SN24
PS24 produced similar increases in p21 protein levels. This would indicate that activation of the proteasome-ubiquitination cascade is a normal process for p21 degradation and that flavopiridol is not activating this process. Instead, it appears that loss of p21 is the result of cleavage of p21 by caspases, specifically by caspase-3, in sequential therapy. This was shown by the addition of z-DEVD-fmk during treatment with SN-38 followed by flavopiridol.
Caspase-3 is processed via two processing steps (36)
. The first step involves a single cleavage of the proenzyme to produce a p24/p12 intermediate. The 24-kDa fragment (large subunit plus prodomain) can be autocleaved to 20 kDa (large subunit plus half of the prodomain) and 17 kDa (large subunit) to produce a mature p17/p12 form of the enzyme. During SN-38/flavopiridol-induced apoptosis, we observed 24-, 20-, and 17-kDa fragments. The addition of z-DEVD-fmk together with flavopiridol to SN-38-treated cells [SN24
(F+z-DEVD)24] inhibited the autocleavage of caspase-3 but did not prevent the activation of upstream caspases. This prevents the formation of the 20- and 17-kDa fragments by caspase-3 with a resultant accumulation of the 24-kDa fragment. The addition z-DEVD-fmk also reversed the p21 cleavage. We did observe small but consistent decreases in the transcription of p21 in SN24
F24-treated cells. However, we believe that caspase-mediated cleavage of p21 is the dominant mechanism for the loss of p21 with SN24
F24 sequential therapy.
Our results indicating that p21 is selectively cleaved during apoptosis are consistent with other reports and support the hypothesis that insufficient expression of p21 during DNA damage response may cause apoptosis (17, 18, 19) . It has been shown that caspase-mediated cleavage of p21 into p14 is crucial in G-Rh2-induced apoptosis in SK-HEP-1 cells (37) . Whether cleavage of p21 in sequential treatment with SN-38 followed by flavopiridol is simply an effect of the induction of apoptosis or whether the cleaved product is a proapoptotic element and amplifies the apoptotic cascade is unclear. Nevertheless, these studies do suggest a dual role for p21: G2 arrest and inhibition of apoptosis. Thus, p21 may serve as a critical checkpoint target for both cell cycle arrest and apoptosis during treatment with SN-38 alone or SN-38 followed by flavopiridol, respectively. Manipulation of p21 expression by flavopiridol after DNA damage response may thus provide a novel strategy for cancer therapy. Additional studies to define the role of p21 in the induction of apoptosis with SN-38 followed by flavopiridol are under way in our laboratory.
Because SN-38 followed by flavopiridol showed higher inhibition of colony formation and more than an additive effect when compared with single agents in apoptosis assays, we elected to test the sequential combination of CPT-11 followed by flavopiridol in vivo. It is intriguing that the timing of the administration of flavopiridol after CPT-11 had such a significant effect on tumor regression and CR. CPT-11 causes transient accumulation of cells in S-phase, after which cells exit and arrest at the G2 phase of the cell cycle. Flavopiridol is a CDK inhibitor. It is possible that administration of flavopiridol too soon after CPT-11 will block cells in G1 and prevent the cells from entering S-phase. This would then prevent the enhancement of the CPT-11 effect observed with the combination treatment. In vitro, when cells were treated with SN-38 for shorter periods of time (47 h) and then were exposed to flavopiridol for an additional 24 h, the induction of apoptosis was lower than the levels of induction observed when cells were treated with SN-38 for 24 h followed by flavopiridol for 24 h (data not shown). In contrast, in vivo, if flavopiridol was administered too late (i.e., 24 h after CPT-11), then the percentage of tumor regression was decreased relative to that observed with CPT-11 alone. However, the in vitro studies were carried out in monolayers, and treatment of three-dimensional in vivo tumor masses may yield completely different results. This could explain the difference in the response to the timing of flavopiridol administration after CPT-11 in both the in vitro and in vivo studies.
The introduction of CPT-11 into the armamentarium of cancer drugs has lead to significant improvements in the treatment of patients with colon cancer. However, in the metastatic setting, responses to CPT-11 remain only 30% (38) . As we improve on our understanding of the molecular basis for the response to camptothecin, we should be able to considerably improve on the therapeutic index. This study and others have shown that cells with defective G2-M checkpoints are more sensitive to camptothecin. However, the challenge ahead is for the checkpoint-intact, camptothecin-resistant tumors, as represented by Hct116 parental cells. To make this agent more attractive in cancer treatment, combining it with chemotherapeutic modulators, such as flavopiridol, appears to be a logical choice. The addition of flavopiridol after SN-38 treatment appears to be necessary to activate the caspase cascade and induce apoptosis. Furthermore, we show for the first time that flavopiridol can enhance the effects of a DNA-damaging agent (i.e., CPT-11) in a corresponding in vivo model. Therefore, flavopiridol represents a new agent for manipulating cellular mechanisms of apoptosis to shift the balance from cell cycle arrest and DNA repair to irreparable DNA damage and apoptosis. On the basis of these studies, a Phase I clinical trial of sequential CPT-11 followed by flavopiridol is now underway.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 This work was supported by Grant R01CA67819 from the National Cancer Institute. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021. Phone: (212) 639-8324; Fax: (212) 717-3320; E-mail: schwartg{at}mskcc.org ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: CDK, cyclin-dependent kinase; CR, complete response; fmk, fluoromethyl ketone; PARP, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. ![]()
Received 12/29/00; revised 8/ 2/01; accepted 8/10/01.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Ambrosini, S. L. Seelman, L.-X. Qin, and G. K. Schwartz The Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor Flavopiridol Potentiates the Effects of Topoisomerase I Poisons by Suppressing Rad51 Expression in a p53-Dependent Manner Cancer Res., April 1, 2008; 68(7): 2312 - 2320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Perrone, S. Suardi, E. Pastore, P. Casieri, M. Orsenigo, S. Caramuta, G. Dagrada, M. Losa, L. Licitra, P. Bossi, et al. Molecular and Cytogenetic Subgroups of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2006; 12(22): 6643 - 6651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. P. Fanton, M. W. Rowe, E. J. Moler, M. Ison-Dugenny, S. K. De Long, K. Rendahl, Y. Shao, T. Slabiak, T. G. Gesner, and M. L. MacKichan Development of a screening assay for surrogate markers of chk1 inhibitor-induced cell cycle release. J Biomol Screen, October 1, 2006; 11(7): 792 - 806. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|