
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Experimental Therapeutics, Preclinical Pharmacology |
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York 10032-2704
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-stimulated c-fos and cyclin D1 promoter activity. EGCG at 0.1 µg/ml (a concentration found in serum after oral administration) markedly enhanced the growth-inhibitory effects of 5-fluorouracil. Taken together, these findings provide insights into molecular mechanisms of growth inhibition by EGCG and suggest that this naturally occurring compound may be useful, when used alone or in combination with other agents, in the chemoprevention and/or treatment of HNSCC. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is well known that 80100% of HNSCCs3
overexpress the EGFR, and that these cells also produce the EGFR ligand TGF-
(16, 17, 18, 19)
. This autocrine effect causes sustained activation of EGFR through autophosphorylation of a critical tyrosine residue (16)
. This, in turn, activates several downstream signaling pathways that enhance cell proliferation, tumor growth, and tumor progression (16
, 20
, 21)
. Indeed, HNSCCs that overexpress EGFR have a poor prognosis (19)
. ERK is an important signaling molecule that lies downstream of EGFR (22)
. Several studies indicate that Stat3 also lies downstream of the EGFR, and activation of Stat3, in vitro and in vivo, is strongly related to carcinogenesis and tumor progression in several types of human malignancies (23
, 24)
, including HNSCCs (25)
. A major target of ERK and Stat3 is AP-1, a complex of transcription factors (26
, 27)
that play important roles in the growth of various types of cancer (28)
. Transcription of the cell cycle control protein cyclin D1 is regulated by both the ras-ERK (26)
and Stat3 signaling pathways (23
, 24)
. Furthermore, cyclin D1 overexpression occurs in several types of human malignancies (29)
, including HNSCC (30
, 31)
, and overexpression of cyclin D1 in HNSCC is associated with a poor prognosis (32)
.
One of the most striking effects of EGCG is its ability to directly inhibit activation of the EGFR (12) . Therefore, in the present study we used two human HNSCC-derived cell lines, YCU-H891 and YCU-N861, to examine possible effects of EGCG on activation of EGFR, ERK, and Stat3 and on cyclin D1 expression. In parallel studies, we also examined the effects of EGCG on cell proliferation, cell cycle progression, and apoptosis. Because 5-FU is used frequently in the treatment of patients with HNSCC, we also examined the combined effects of EGCG and 5-FU on proliferation in these two cell lines.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
from Life Technologies, Inc. (Grand Island, NY). EGCG was dissolved in water, and 5-FU was dissolved in DMSO.
Cell Lines and Cell Culture.
The human head and neck cancer cell lines YCU-H891 (derived from a tumor of the hypopharynx) and YCU-N861 (from a tumor of the nasopharynx) were generously provided by Dr. M. Tsukuda (Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan). The YCU-H891 cells express high levels of the EGFR (33)
. Both cell lines were maintained in a 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C in RPMI 1640 containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies, Inc.).
Colony Formation Assays.
The cytotoxic effects of EGCG and/or 5-FU were measured by colony formation assays. One thousand cells were seeded into 35- or 100-mm dishes. Twenty-four h later, the indicated concentrations of drugs were added. After incubation for 48 h, the drugs were washed out, and the cells were incubated for an additional 5 days (35-mm dishes) or 7 days (100-mm dishes). The colonies were then stained with Giemsa solution and counted, in triplicate assays. The relative surviving fraction, compared with cells treated with only the vehicle, was then calculated.
Cell Cycle Assays.
Exponentially growing cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of EGCG and were harvested by trypsinization at the indicated time. The cells were then washed twice with PBS, fixed in 70% ethanol for 30 min at room temperature, washed again with PBS, treated with 0.1 µg/ml RNase, and stained with 25 µg/ml propidium iodide. Flow cytometric analyses were carried out on a FACScalibur instrument using the CELL Quest program (Becton Dickinson, San Diego, CA).
Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis.
Control or treated cells were harvested at the indicated times. Total cellular protein was extracted using the M-Per Mammalian Protein Extraction Reagent (Pierce Corp., Rockford, IL) plus leupeptin (10 µg/ml), aprotinin (2 µg/ml), and phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (2.5 mM), and the amount of protein was quantified with the Coomassie Protein Assay Reagent kit (Pierce). The gel was loaded with 4050 µg of protein/lane, and the proteins were subject to electrophoresis on this 7.512.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and then transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. The following primary antibodies were then used for immunoblotting: p21 (H-164), cyclin D1 (M-20), pRB (SC-50), Bcl-2 (N-19), Bcl-XL (H-62), Bax (N-20), and caspase 9 (H-38), all from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). The p27 antibody (DCS-72) was from Oncogene (Cambridge, MA), and the actin antibody (20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33)
was from Sigma Chemical Co. Protein bands were detected using the ECL-enhanced chemiluminescence system (Amersham International, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom).
EGFR, Stat3, and ERK Phosphorylation Assays.
Forty to 50% confluent cultures were incubated in RPMI 1640 minus serum for 24 h and then incubated in the presence or absence of 10 µg/ml of EGCG for an additional 24 h and then harvested. One half of these cultures were also stimulated with 50 ng/ml of TGF-
, for the indicated time, just prior to harvesting. Proteins were extracted, and Western blot analysis was performed as described above. For the detection of specific proteins, the following antibodies were used: phospho-EGFR (clone 74) and EGFR (clone 13) from Transduction Laboratory (Lexington, KY); phospho-Stat3 (B-7) and Stat3 (F-2) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology; phospho-ERK1/2 (9106S) from Cell Signaling (Beverly, MA); and ERK1/2 (15868) from Upstate Biotechnology (Lake Placid, NY). The phospho-EGFR antibody reacts only with the tyrosine autophosphorylated (activated form) of the EGFR.
Cyclin D1 and c-fos Reporter Assays.
The cyclin D1-promoter luciferase reporter plasmid-1745CD1LUC was constructed and provided by Dr. R. Pestell (Albert Einstein Cancer Center, New York, NY) (34)
. The c-fos promoter-luciferase reporter plasmid p-FOS-wt-luc and the method we used for transient transfection luciferase reporter assays were described previously (22)
. Triplicate samples of 1 x 105 cells in 35-mm plates were transfected using lipofectin (Life Technologies, Inc., Rockville, MD). One µg of DNA of the indicated luciferase reporter plasmid and 10 ng of the control pCMV-ß-gal plasmid were cotransfected in opti-MEM I medium (Life Technologies, Inc., Rockville, MD). After 16 h, the medium was changed to serum-free RPMI 1640 containing the indicated concentration of EGCG. For growth factor stimulation assays, 50 ng/ml of TGF-
were added 30 min after adding the EGCG. The cells were then incubated for 24 h, and luciferase activity was determined with the luciferase assay system (Promega Corp., Madison, WI). ß-gal activities were determined using the ß-gal enzyme assay system (Promega Corp., Madison, WI). Luciferase activities were then normalized with respect to ß-gal activities.
Cell Proliferation Assays.
Cell proliferation was determined using a PreMix WST-1 Cell Proliferation Assay System (Takara, Tokyo, Japan), according to the manufactures instructions. Briefly, 3 x 103 cells were seeded in a 96-well plate. Twenty-four h later, the indicated concentrations of 5-FU and/or EGCG were added. After incubation for 48 h, the cells were washed twice with PBS and then incubated for 2 h in medium containing the 10% PreMix WST-1 reagent. Absorbance was then measured using a microplate reader at a wavelength of 450 nm. Cell proliferation was calculated by dividing the absorbance of the treated cells by that of the vehicle-treated control cells (taken as 100%). Each point represents the average of triplicate wells.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
10 µg/ml. The YCU-N 861 cells were, however, more sensitive to lower concentrations of EGCG than the YCU-H891 cells (Fig. 1)
50% inhibition of YCU-N861 cells but had no effect on YCU-H891 cells (Fig. 1)
|
|
|
Effects of EGCG on Signal Transduction.
As described in the "Introduction," previous studies with EGCG in other cell types indicated that it can inhibit signaling pathways related to the activation of growth factor receptors (11, 12, 13)
. HNSCCs often display up-regulation of TGF-
/EGFR signal transduction pathways (16, 17, 18, 19)
. Therefore, it was of interest to examine in our two cell lines the effects of EGCG on cellular levels and the phosphorylation status of the EGFR protein and also the Stat3 and ERK proteins, which lie downstream of the EGFR (22, 23, 24, 25)
, by performing Western blot analyses with the respective non-phospho-specific and phospho-specific antibodies. YCU-H891 and YCU-N861 cells were grown in serum minus medium for 24 h to reduce exposure to external growth factors, and half of these cultures were then treated with 10 µg/ml of EGCG for 24 h. Half of both sets of cultures were stimulated with 50 ng/ml of TGF-
for 6 h (YCU-H891) or 18 h (YCU-N861), just before harvesting. Then, extracts were prepared and examined by Western blot analyses (Fig. 4)
.
|
, the serum-starved YCU-H891 cells expressed rather high levels of the EGCG, ERK and Stat3 proteins. In addition, these serum-starved cells displayed rather high levels of the phosphorylated forms of these three proteins, and the levels and phosphorylation status of these proteins did not significantly increase after TGF-
stimulation (Fig. 4)
/EGFR autocrine loop, because this is often observed in EGFR-overexpressing HNSCCs (18
, 21)
. In the YCU-H891 cells, treatment with EGCG did not appreciably affect the levels of the EGFR, ERK, and Stat3 proteins, but it did markedly decrease the phosphorylation of these three proteins, both in the absence and presence of TGF-
(Fig. 4)
On the other hand, in the absence of TGF-
, the YCU-N861 cells did not display detectable levels of the EGFR or Stat3 proteins or the phosphorylated forms of these two proteins (Fig. 4)
. They did, however, display an appreciable level of the ERK protein and also the phosphorylated form of ERK. Stimulation of these cells with TGF-
induced increased expression of the EGFR and Stat3 proteins and also the phosphorylation of both these two proteins, as well as increased phosphorylation of the ERK protein. Treatment with EGCG in the absence of TGF-
led to a decrease in phosphorylation of the ERK protein. In the TGF-
-treated cells, EGCG markedly inhibited induction of the EGFR and Stat3 proteins caused by TGF-
and also markedly decreased the levels of the respective phospho-proteins (Fig. 4)
.
These results suggest that both the autocrine activation of EGFR signaling in YCU-H891 cells and the activation induced by exogenous TGF-
in YCU-N861 cells are markedly inhibited by EGCG, and as a consequence EGCG also inhibits signaling to the ERK and Stat3 proteins, in both cell lines.
Effects of EGCG on c-fos and Cyclin D1 Promoter Activity.
There is evidence that both activated ERK and Stat3 enhance transcription of the c-fos and cyclin D1 genes (24
, 26
, 27)
. Therefore, it was of interest to determine in our two cell lines the effects of EGCG on the transcription of these two genes, using c-fos promoter-luciferase and cyclin D1 promoter-luciferase constructs in transient transfection reporter assays. The cells were transfected for 16 h with the respective reporter plasmid and then cultured for 24 h in serum minus medium, with or without the indicated concentrations of TGF-
and/or EGCG (Fig. 5)
. We found that in both the YCU-H891 and YCU-N861 cell lines, EGCG inhibited basal, and also TGF-
-stimulated, c-fos promoter and cyclin D1 promoter activities. It is of interest that the absolute levels of luciferase activities were lower in the YCU-N861 cells than in the YCU-H891 cells (Fig. 5)
. This may reflect, in part, the difference between these two cell lines, with respect to the expression and phosphorylation of EGFR, ERK, and Stat3 shown in Fig. 4
.
|
40% with both cell lines (Fig. 7B)
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
10 µg/ml (Fig. 1)
We found that the cell death induced by EGCG in both of these two cell lines (Fig. 1)
was associated with a decrease in the antiapoptotic Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL proteins and an increase in the proapoptotic Bax protein and also activation of the caspase 9 protein (Fig. 3)
. Taken together, these results provide evidence that the apoptosis induced in these cells (Fig. 2)
is mediated by a mitochondrial pathway (35, 36, 37)
. We also obtained evidence that EGCG treatment inhibited the activity of Stat3 (Fig. 4)
. Several studies (23
, 42
, 43)
have demonstrated that Stat3 can up-regulate the expression of Bcl-XL and Bcl-2. Therefore, inhibition of Stat3 by EGCG may be the cause for the decrease in the levels of the Bcl-XL and Bcl-2 proteins, but the precise mechanism by which EGCG causes an increase in the level of the Bax protein remains to be determined.
As mentioned above, in the present study we also found that the inhibition of cell proliferation by EGCG in our two cell lines was associated with a G1 arrest of the cell cycle (Fig. 2)
. Previous studies also demonstrated that EGCG causes a G1 arrest in cell lines from various types of malignancies including HNSCCs (3, 4, 5
, 7)
. In the present study, Western blot analyses indicated that EGCG treatment causes an increase in the levels of the cell cycle inhibitor proteins p21Cip1 and p27Kip1 and a decrease in the level of cyclin D1, an important G1 cyclin, and a decrease in the hyperphosphorylated form of the pRB protein. The latter change is probably a consequence of the changes in expression of the cyclin D1, p21Cip1, and p27Kip1 proteins and presumably explains the arrest in G1 induced by EGCG. Similar findings were reported recently by other investigators. Thus, Liang et al. (4)
found that EGCG inhibited the activation of cyclin-dependent kinases 2 and 4 through induction of the p21Cip1 and p27Kip1 proteins in breast cancer cells, and Liberto and Cobrinik (5)
found that EGCG induced the p21Cip1 protein and inhibited the cyclin D1-associated pRB kinase activity in a human breast epithelial cell line (MCF10A). Our cyclin D1 promoter-luciferase reporter assays (Fig. 6)
suggest that EGCG inhibits the expression of cyclin D1 at the level of transcription, but the mechanism by which EGCG increases the levels of the p21Cip1 and p27Kip1 proteins remains to be determined. The p53 status of the two cell lines used in this study is not known. However, in future studies it will be important to evaluate the possible role of the p53 protein in modulating some of the above-described effects of EGCG, because
50% of HNSCCs carry mutations in the p53 gene (32)
.
It is well known that increased EGFR expression is often an early event and also an adverse prognostic factor in patients with HNSCCs (16
, 18
, 19)
. Studies by Grandis and co-workers (25
, 43, 44, 45)
demonstrated that in HNSCC, Stat3 lies downstream of the TGF-
/EGFR signaling pathway, and Stat3 is strongly implicated in the growth of these carcinomas and in protecting them from apoptosis. Furthermore, cyclin D1 is one of the genes that is activated by Stat3 (23
, 24)
, although the precise mechanism by which the expression of cyclin D1 is enhanced by Stat3 remains to be determined. As discussed in the "Introduction," increased expression of cyclin D1 is seen in many types of human cancer including HNSCCs (29, 30, 31)
, and expression of an antisense cyclin D1 sequence in human cancer cells can inhibit their growth and tumorigenicity and also enhance their responsiveness to several chemotherapeutic agents (46, 47, 48, 49)
.
The present study provides the first evidence that EGCG inhibits Stat3 activation and cyclin D1 promoter activity in human cancer cell lines. Our study extends previous evidence that EGCG inhibits activation of growth factor receptors and ERK proteins and also inhibits AP-1 activity and c-fos promoter activity (11, 12, 13 , 28 , 50, 51, 52) . A striking finding by Liang et al. (12) is that in A431 epidermal carcinoma cells, EGCG directly inhibits binding of EGF to EGFR and also directly inhibits EGFR kinase activity. It remains to be determined whether these effects in themselves explain the multiple effects of EGCG on signal transduction, gene expression, growth inhibition, and induction of apoptosis seen in the present study or whether EGCG has other direct molecular targets in HNSCC cells.
In the present study, we found that even a low concentration of EGCG (0.1 µg/ml) synergistically enhances the cytotoxic effects of 5-FU (Fig. 7)
. This concentration of EGCG corresponds to the plasma concentration of EGCG, after an individual drinks several cups of tea (39)
or after oral administration of EGCG-containing compounds (40)
. The mechanism of this synergy is not known but may relate to the above-described effects of EGCG on signal transduction and gene expression. A hypothetical scheme is shown in Fig. 8
. It is of interest that the ability of EGCG to enhance the cytotoxicity of 5-FU was greater in the YCU-H891 cells than in the YCU-N861 cells (Fig. 7A)
, because the former cells have higher EGFR activity (Fig. 4)
and may, therefore, be more dependent on this pathway. We should also emphasize that these two cell lines differ in other important respects that may influence their response to EGCG. Thus, the YCU-N861 cell line was derived from a nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and these tumors often carry the EBV, which can alter their physiology (53)
. In future studies, it will also be of interest to determine whether EGCG increases the sensitivity of various types of HNSCC cell lines to 5-FU, other chemotherapy agents, and/or radiation.
|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 This work was supported by awards (to I. B. W.) from the National Foundation for Cancer Research and the T. J. Martell Foundation. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, HHSC-1509, 701 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032-2704. Phone: (212) 305-6921; Fax: (212) 305-6889; E-mail: weinstein{at}cuccfa.ccc.columbia.edu ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: HNSCC, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; EGCG, epigallocatechin-3-gallate; 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; Stat3, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; ERK, extracellular regulated kinase; TGF, transforming growth factor; AP-1, activator protein-1; ß-gal, ß-galactosidase; IC70, 70% lethal dose. ![]()
Received 6/12/01; revised 9/10/01; accepted 9/17/01.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and epidermal growth factor receptor messenger RNA are early markers of carcinogenesis in head and neck cancer. Cancer Res., 53: 3579-3584, 1993.
and epidermal growth factor receptor in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer (Phila.), 78: 1284-1292, 1996.[CrossRef][Medline]
and EGFR protein in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and patient survival. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 90: 824-832, 1998.
protein expression with antisense oligonucleotides inhibits proliferation of head and neck squamous carcinoma but not normal mucosal epithelial cells. J. Cell Biochem., 69: 55-62, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
activates the epidermal growth factor receptor and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in carcinoma cells, leading to increased proliferation and protection from radiation-induced cell death. Mol. Biol. Cell, 10: 2493-2506, 1999.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A.R.M. R. Amin, O. Kucuk, F. R. Khuri, and D. M. Shin Perspectives for Cancer Prevention With Natural Compounds J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2009; 27(16): 2712 - 2725. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Song, K. Krishnan, K. Liu, and R. S. Bresalier Polyphenon E Inhibits the Growth of Human Barrett's and Aerodigestive Adenocarcinoma Cells by Suppressing Cyclin D1 Expression Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2009; 15(2): 622 - 631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Adachi, T. Nagao, S. To, A. K. Joe, M. Shimizu, R. Matsushima-Nishiwaki, O. Kozawa, H. Moriwaki, F. R. Maxfield, and I.B. Weinstein (-)-Epigallocatechin gallate causes internalization of the epidermal growth factor receptor in human colon cancer cells Carcinogenesis, October 1, 2008; 29(10): 1986 - 1993. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Abrams Review: Chemoprevention of esophageal adenocarcinoma Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology, July 1, 2008; 1(1): 7 - 18. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Adachi, T. Nagao, H. I. Ingolfsson, F. R. Maxfield, O. S. Andersen, L. Kopelovich, and I. B. Weinstein The Inhibitory Effect of (-)-Epigallocatechin Gallate on Activation of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Is Associated with Altered Lipid Order in HT29 Colon Cancer Cells Cancer Res., July 1, 2007; 67(13): 6493 - 6501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Sartippour, R. Pietras, D. C. Marquez-Garban, H.-W. Chen, D. Heber, S. M. Henning, G. Sartippour, L. Zhang, M. Lu, O. Weinberg, et al. The combination of green tea and tamoxifen is effective against breast cancer Carcinogenesis, December 1, 2006; 27(12): 2424 - 2433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Spinella, L. Rosano, V. Di Castro, S. Decandia, A. Albini, M. R. Nicotra, P. G. Natali, and A. Bagnato Green tea polyphenol epigallocatechin-3-gallate inhibits the endothelin axis and downstream signaling pathways in ovarian carcinoma. Mol. Cancer Ther., June 1, 2006; 5(6): 1483 - 1492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Zhang, X. Tang, Q. Lu, Z. Zhang, J. Rao, and A. D. Le Green tea extract and (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate inhibit hypoxia- and serum-induced HIF-1{alpha} protein accumulation and VEGF expression in human cervical carcinoma and hepatoma cells Mol. Cancer Ther., May 1, 2006; 5(5): 1227 - 1238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Lambert, M.-J. Lee, L. Diamond, J. Ju, J. Hong, M. Bose, H. L. Newmark, and C. S. Yang DOSE-DEPENDENT LEVELS OF EPIGALLOCATECHIN-3-GALLATE IN HUMAN COLON CANCER CELLS AND MOUSE PLASMA AND TISSUES Drug Metab. Dispos., January 1, 2006; 34(1): 8 - 11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Hou, S. Sang, H. You, M.-J. Lee, J. Hong, K.-V. Chin, and C. S. Yang Mechanism of Action of (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate: Auto-oxidation-Dependent Inactivation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and Direct Effects on Growth Inhibition in Human Esophageal Cancer KYSE 150 Cells Cancer Res., September 1, 2005; 65(17): 8049 - 8056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. E. Lim, M. Mansukhani, and I. B. Weinstein Cyclin-dependent kinase 6 associates with the androgen receptor and enhances its transcriptional activity in prostate cancer cells PNAS, April 5, 2005; 102(14): 5156 - 5161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Shimizu, A. Deguchi, J. T.E. Lim, H. Moriwaki, L. Kopelovich, and I. B. Weinstein (-)-Epigallocatechin Gallate and Polyphenon E Inhibit Growth and Activation of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 Signaling Pathways in Human Colon Cancer Cells Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2005; 11(7): 2735 - 2746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D Lambert, J. Hong, G.-y. Yang, J. Liao, and C. S Yang Inhibition of carcinogenesis by polyphenols: evidence from laboratory investigations Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2005; 81(1): 284S - 291S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Shimizu, M. Suzui, A. Deguchi, J. T. E. Lim, D. Xiao, J. H. Hayes, K. P. Papadopoulos, and I. B. Weinstein Synergistic Effects of Acyclic Retinoid and OSI-461 on Growth Inhibition and Gene Expression in Human Hepatoma Cells Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2004; 10(19): 6710 - 6721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Vittal, Z. E. Selvanayagam, Y. Sun, J. Hong, F. Liu, K.-V. Chin, and C. S. Yang Gene expression changes induced by green tea polyphenol (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate in human bronchial epithelial 21BES cells analyzed by DNA microarray Mol. Cancer Ther., September 1, 2004; 3(9): 1091 - 1099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Fassina, R. Vene, M. Morini, S. Minghelli, R. Benelli, D. M. Noonan, and A. Albini Mechanisms of Inhibition of Tumor Angiogenesis and Vascular Tumor Growth by Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2004; 10(14): 4865 - 4873. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Mukhtar and M. Pellecchia Correspondence re: M. Leone et al., Cancer Prevention by Tea Polyphenols Is Linked to Their Direct Inhibition of Antiapoptotic Bcl-2-Family Proteins. Cancer Res 2003;63:8118-21. Cancer Res., April 1, 2004; 64(7): 2639 - 2640. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Sah, S. Balasubramanian, R. L. Eckert, and E. A. Rorke Epigallocatechin-3-gallate Inhibits Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signaling Pathway: EVIDENCE FOR DIRECT INHIBITION OF ERK1/2 AND AKT KINASES J. Biol. Chem., March 26, 2004; 279(13): 12755 - 12762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Shimizu, M. Suzui, A. Deguchi, J. T. E. Lim, and I. B. Weinstein Effects of Acyclic Retinoid on Growth, Cell Cycle Control, Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signaling, and Gene Expression in Human Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2004; 10(3): 1130 - 1140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Kaput and R. L. Rodriguez Nutritional genomics: the next frontier in the postgenomic era Physiol Genomics, January 15, 2004; 16(2): 166 - 177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Lambert, M.-J. Lee, H. Lu, X. Meng, J. J. J. Hong, D. N. Seril, M. G. Sturgill, and C. S. Yang Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate Is Absorbed but Extensively Glucuronidated Following Oral Administration to Mice,2 J. Nutr., December 1, 2003; 133(12): 4172 - 4177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Lambert and C. S. Yang Mechanisms of Cancer Prevention by Tea Constituents J. Nutr., October 1, 2003; 133(10): 3262S - 3267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Masuda, M. Suzui, J. T. E. Lim, and I. B. Weinstein Epigallocatechin-3-gallate Inhibits Activation of HER-2/neu and Downstream Signaling Pathways in Human Head and Neck and Breast Carcinoma Cells Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2003; 9(9): 3486 - 3491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Chen, G. Shen, V. Hebbar, R. Hu, E. D. Owuor, and A.-N.T. Kong Epigallocatechin-3-gallate-induced stress signals in HT-29 human colon adenocarcinoma cells Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2003; 24(8): 1369 - 1378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. O. McCarthy Rethinking Nutritional Support for Persons with Cancer Cachexia Biol Res Nurs, July 1, 2003; 5(1): 3 - 17. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hong, H. Lu, X. Meng, J.-H. Ryu, Y. Hara, and C. S. Yang Stability, Cellular Uptake, Biotransformation, and Efflux of Tea Polyphenol (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate in HT-29 Human Colon Adenocarcinoma Cells Cancer Res., December 15, 2002; 62(24): 7241 - 7246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kazi, D. M. Smith, Q. Zhong, and Q. P. Dou Inhibition of Bcl-XL Phosphorylation by Tea Polyphenols or Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate Is Associated with Prostate Cancer Cell Apoptosis Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2002; 62(4): 765 - 771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Levites, T. Amit, M. B. H. Youdim, and S. Mandel Involvement of Protein Kinase C Activation and Cell Survival/ Cell Cycle Genes in Green Tea Polyphenol (-)-Epigallocatechin 3-Gallate Neuroprotective Action J. Biol. Chem., August 16, 2002; 277(34): 30574 - 30580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Masuda, M. Suzui, R. Yasumatu, T. Nakashima, Y. Kuratomi, K. Azuma, K. Tomita, S. Komiyama, and I. B. Weinstein Constitutive Activation of Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription 3 Correlates with Cyclin D1 Overexpression and May Provide a Novel Prognostic Marker in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cancer Res., June 1, 2002; 62(12): 3351 - 3355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |