
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Experimental Therapeutics, Preclinical Pharmacology |
The Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21231 [H. A. H., V. R. D., K. A. B., W. L. D., R. A. C., N. E. D.], and Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48202 [P. M. W.]
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-positive MCF-7 and T-47D lines. These preclinical
data demonstrate a treatment schedule and combinations of polyamine
analogues and cytotoxics that will be important to study
mechanistically and clinically for breast cancer. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The polyamine analogue DENSPM has been evaluated in Phase I clinical trials (15 , 16) . Using a once-daily infusion schedule (for 5 days, repeated every 21 days), the drug was well tolerated, and gastrointestinal toxicity was the dose-limiting toxicity. There was no significant hematological toxicity, and this schedule is currently being evaluated in Phase II studies. Pharmacokinetic analysis using this dosing schedule demonstrated patient plasma concentrations in the micromolar range that are consistent with concentrations required in vitro for inhibition of cell growth and induction of PCD. The antitumor activity of polyamine analogues in multiple experimental model systems, as well as the preliminary clinical data available for the analogue DENSPM, attest to the therapeutic potential of this class of agents.
Although all of the roles of polyamines in cell proliferation are not known, the capacity to interact with DNA (17) and affect DNA conformation (18) are thought to play a role in their normal cellular function. Therefore, several investigators have evaluated whether depletion of polyamine pools can modulate the activity of DNA-reactive drugs in tumor model systems. These studies have generally combined chemotherapeutic agents with compounds that deplete polyamine pools via inhibition of key biosynthetic enzymes such as ornithine decarboxylase or S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase (19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36) . The results of these experiments have been mixed, with some combinations demonstrating synergistic or additive activity and others demonstrating antagonism.
Only two combination studies have been done in breast cancer models. Thomas and Kiang (36) evaluated the activity of antiestrogens in combination with DFMO, an inhibitor of ornithine decarboxylase in the breast cancer cell line MCF-7 and demonstrated additive activity of these agents on cell growth inhibition. Das et al. (35) showed that concomitant or pre- or post-paclitaxel exposure of MCF-7 cells to DFMO resulted in antagonism of paclitaxel-induced cell growth inhibition and apoptosis.
Combined effects of cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents and polyamine analogues in preclinical models of breast cancer have not been assessed. In this report, we evaluate the activity of the polyamine analogues, CPENSpm and CHENSpm, in combination with multiple cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents currently in use in the treatment of breast cancer in breast cell lines, in vitro.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Growth Inhibition Assays.
Cells in the exponential growth phase were plated at 15 x
104 cells/cm2 in 24-well
tissue culture plates. After attachment overnight, the medium was
changed, and the cells were incubated with or without drugs for the
desired exposure times. After 120 h, the cells were detached by
trypsinization and counted using a Coulter counter. Percentage growth
inhibition was determined by comparison of cell number per well in
treated versus control cells.
Growth inhibition was also assessed using the MTT (Sigma Chemical Co.) dye assay (39) . For the MTT assay, cells were plated in 96-well dishes and treated as above. On completion of the treatment period, the media was discarded, and 100 µl of MTT (5 mg/ml in culture medium filter sterilized) was added to each well for 4 h at 37°C. The MTT solution was then removed, and the formazan crystals were dissolved in 200 µl/well of a 1:1 (v/v) solution of DMSO:ethanol for 20 min at ambient temperature. Change in absorbance was determined at A540 nm. Results were compared with wells that contained culture medium but no cells, and percentage growth inhibition was calculated by comparison of the A540 nm reading from treated versus control cells. Drug concentrations that resulted in an IC50 were determined from the plots of percentage growth inhibition versus the logarithm of the drug concentration. All of the experiments were plated in triplicate wells and were carried out at least twice. Prior to the usage of the MTT assay in experiments, the results were validated by direct comparison of results from MTT assay and conventional cell growth assays; results were consistently comparable.
Clonogenic Assay.
For colony formation assay, 200 MCF-7 cells per 60-mm tissue culture
dish were allowed to attach overnight. The chemotherapeutic drug of
interest was then added on day 0. After 24 h, media were removed,
and the cell monolayer washed with drug- and serum-free media. The
cells were then exposed for the remainder of the culture period to
media containing the polyamine analogue alone. After 10 days, the cell
monolayer was washed once with PBS, stained with crystal violet [0.5%
crystal violet in a 3:1 (v/v) mixture of water to methanol], washed
with water, and allowed to dry at ambient temperature. Visible colonies
were counted.
Synergy Studies.
The median effect/CI Analysis (40)
was used to determine
antagonism, additivity, or synergy of combination exposures to both
polyamine analogues and cytotoxic drugs. Cell cultures were treated
with each agent individually at its IC50
concentration and at fixed multiples (two and three times) and
fractions (0.75, 0.50, and 0.25) of the IC50
concentrations. The agents (polyamine analogue and drug) were also
combined in these same dose-fixed ratios to determine CI. Antagonism
was defined as any CI value above 1, additivity as CI = 1, and
synergy as <1 ± SD. Experiments were done in triplicate, and
each experiment yielded one CI value. Experiments that yielded a CI of
less than 1 were repeated at least three times to allow for
determination of SD for the CI values obtained. Experiments that
yielded CI values of >1 were repeated once if the results were
consistent, and the CI value shown is a representative value from one
of these experiments. CI values are shown only for fractional growth
inhibition levels of 0.50 or greater, because dose intensity is known
to be important in breast cancer treatment (41)
.
Treatment Schedules.
Three different treatment schedules were used to mimic schedules that
are potentially clinically relevant. The first treatment schedule used
simultaneous exposure to both polyamine analogue and cytotoxic drug for
120 h. In the second treatment schedule, the cells were exposed to
24 h of cytotoxic drug (starting on day 0). The medium was then
discarded, the cell monolayer washed once with drug-free medium, and
fresh medium containing the polyamine analogue was added for the
remainder of the culture period (96 h). The third treatment
schedule evaluated cell exposure to polyamine analogue alone for
24 h followed by removal of the medium and addition of medium
containing both polyamine analogue and drug for the remainder of the
culture period (96 h). Sustained exposure to the polyamine analogue was
used in all of the treatment schedules because other studies have shown
that lengthy exposure is necessary for optimal polyamine analogue
activity (5)
.
Analysis of Polyamine Content.
The polyamine content of treated and untreated cells was determined by
precolumn dansylation, reversed-phase, high-performance liquid
chromatographic methods of Kabra et al. (42)
.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Effects of CPENSpm or CHENSpm and Chemotherapeutic Drugs on MCF-7
Cells.
The schedule of drug exposure for 24 h followed by CPENSpm for
96 h in MCF-7 cells showed a synergistic effect on growth for all
of the eight cytotoxic drugs at a fractional growth inhibition of 0.50
or greater (Table 1)
. The greatest degree of synergy was seen with the fluoropyrimidines
and vinorelbine. In contrast, concurrent exposure to drug and CPENSpm
for 120 h resulted in synergistic growth inhibition only with 5-FU
and vinorelbine at fractional growth inhibition of 0.75. Similarly, the
schedule of CPENSpm, followed by CPENSpm and drug, led to synergistic
growth effects only with doxorubicin, c-DDP, paclitaxel, and docetaxel.
The degree of synergy and the range of fractional growth inhibitions
for which synergy was seen were also less with this sequence than those
seen with the schedule of drug exposure followed by CPENSpm.
|
Identical studies were undertaken using CHENSpm and cytotoxics in MCF-7
cells (Table 2)
. Evidence for synergistic interaction was seen only with the sequence
of cytotoxic agent followed by CHENSpm. Unlike CPENSpm, synergy was
seen with fewer drugs including c-DDP and paclitaxel at a fractional
growth inhibition of 0.90, 5-FU and FdURd at a fractional growth
inhibition of
0.75, and vinorelbine at a fractional growth inhibition
of
0.50. No synergistic combinations were seen with the treatment
schedule of concurrent treatment or CHENSpm followed by the combination
of cytotoxic and CHENSpm.
|
|
0.75 for 5-FU and
0.90 for FdURd (Table 5)
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Synergistic combinations were identified using one or both of the polyamine analogues in all of the cell lines evaluated. There was a schedule dependence for synergy, with the sequence of cytotoxic drug exposure for 24 h followed by polyamine analogue for 96 h resulting in the greatest number of synergistic combinations as well as the greatest magnitude of synergy for the MCF-7 and MDA-MB-468 cell lines. It is unclear why this schedule is superior even when using diverse chemotherapeutic agents in combination with either polyamine analogue in the multiple breast cancer cell lines. Most of the previous combination studies with DFMO and/or MGBG and chemotherapeutic agents have focused on treatment with the enzyme inhibitor initially to perturb polyamine pools before drug therapy based on the hypothesis that resultant changes in DNA conformation may allow for greater drug access. Despite its biological rationale, this schedule gave inconsistent results with some studies demonstrating synergism (21 , 25 , 33) for some DNA-directed agents, whereas others demonstrated antagonism (23 , 25 , 31 , 34 , 35) .
Only two studies published to date have evaluated the activity of combination studies with polyamine analogues and chemotherapeutic agents in in vitro tumor model systems. One study (24) combined the spermidine analogue BESpd with 4'-(9-acridinylamino)methanesulfon-M anisidide (m-AMSA) in a human lung cancer cell line to evaluate the induction of topoisomerase II-dependent drug-induced cleavable DNA complexes. Unfortunately, it did not address cell growth inhibition or colony-forming ability with combination therapy versus drug alone. Marverti et al. (44) studied the effect of the spermine analogue, BESpm, and c-DDP on the growth of c-DDPsensitive and -resistant ovarian carcinoma cells. In the c-DDP-sensitive cell line, concomitant exposure to c-DDP and BESpm demonstrated synergy, whereas the c-DDP-resistant cell line was found to be cross-resistant to BESpm. However, when the colony-forming ability was evaluated after concurrent treatment with both of the agents, there was a synergistic interaction as determined by median effect/CI analysis. Of note, c-DDP in our breast cancer models demonstrated synergy in combination with CPENSpm and CHENSpm in the MCF-7 cell line, and CPENSpm in the T-47D cell line.
CPENSpm and CHENSpm are both spermine analogues with antitumor activity and the ability to induce PCD in multiple experimental model systems, yet they apparently have different mechanisms of action. CPENSpm has been shown to superinduce the catabolic enzyme SSAT in a number of model systems (7 , 10 , 45 , 46) . This superinduction is associated with production of hydrogen peroxide, and increased oxidative stress is believed to be an important mediator in the induction of PCD by this agent in select tumor types (47) . CHENSpm, however, does not superinduce this enzyme in any model system studied; yet it has significant antitumor activity and also induces PCD. In a human lung cancer model, this agent leads to a G2-M cell cycle arrest (47) and alters tubulin polymerization (48) . These agents demonstrated different spectrums of activities in combination with chemotherapeutic drugs in the breast cancer models.
In the breast cancer cell lines studied, two classes of agents, the fluoropyrimidines and vinorelbine demonstrated the most activity in combination with CPENSpm or CHENSpm. 5-FU demonstrated synergy in combination with CPENSpm in three of the five breast cancer cell lines evaluated when drug treatment preceded polyamine analogue exposure. 5-FU and/or FdURd demonstrated synergy in combination with CHENSpm in all of the five cell lines. This class of drugs has not been previously evaluated in combination studies with polyamine analogues, although there have been several studies in epithelial tumor model systems using DFMO in combination with 5-FU with variable results (19 , 32 , 33) .
In contrast, our results in the breast cancer cell lines with two different spermine analogues demonstrate synergistic combinations with one or both analogues in several of the breast cancer cell lines evaluated. These findings warrant further evaluation in in vivo models of breast cancer and examination of the possible mechanisms responsible for synergy. 5-FU is an antimetabolite with several mechanisms of action, including inhibition of thymidylate synthase and incorporation into DNA and/or RNA (49) . Evaluation of cell cycle modulation, total intracellular 5-FU content, specific incorporation into DNA and RNA, and thymidylate synthase activity in the presence of the polyamine analogue are currently being explored. Because different schedules of treatment or the same schedule in a different cell line can result in different responses (additivity, antagonism, or synergy), evaluation of these changes using different treatment schedules and breast cancer cell lines with variable responses should help identify mechanisms that play a role in a synergistic response.
One of the possible mechanisms, the effect of drug on polyamine analogue cellular accumulation and polyamine pool depletion was extensively evaluated in the MCF-7 cell line. This cell line was chosen because it demonstrated synergy with all of the cytotoxic drugs evaluated in combination with CPENSpm as well as with several drugs in combination with CHENSpm using the treatment schedule of drug followed by analogue. Five of eight drugs tested led to increased CPENSpm levels in the cells treated with the combination compared with cells treated with analogue alone, and this increase was associated with further depletion of the polyamine levels. This change may well play an important role in the synergistic response seen with these drugs in combination. Whether the increased level of CPENSpm is attributable to decreased efflux or to alterations in metabolism will need to be evaluated. In addition, it will be interesting to see whether this phenomenon occurs as well in in vivo model systems as well, and how these changes might correlate with effects on tumor growth.
Similar studies of intracellular polyamines and CHENSpm levels in MCF-7 cells showed that substantial increases in CHENSpm levels occurred only in combination with the fluoropyrimidines. What role this may play in the synergy that is seen with those agents and CHENSpm remains to be defined. Synergistic responses to drug combinations may be attributable to more than one mechanism. Thus, the finding of changes in polyamine analogue levels in combination studies will need to be evaluated in several other breast cancer cell lines to see whether this relationship between synergy and increased intracellular analogue levels holds true. Not all of the synergistic drug combinations in the MCF-7 cell line were associated with changes in polyamine pools or analogue levels, which suggests that alternate mechanisms are involved in these synergistic responses with certain chemotherapeutic agents.
The combination of vinorelbine, an antimitotic agent that binds tubulin resulting in microtubule depolymerization (50) , and CPENSpm demonstrates synergy in all of the breast cancer cell lines except MDA-MB-468. But when used with CHENSpm in the MCF-7 and MDA-MB-468 cell lines, vinorelbine was antagonistic in the MDA-MB-468 cell line and synergistic in the MCF-7 cell line. Polyamines may play a role in the natural dynamics of microtubules (51 , 52) , and some polyamine analogues have been shown to induce a G2-M cell cycle arrest and alter tubulin dynamics (47 , 48) . The positive interaction between polyamine analogues and vinorelbine may be mediated by further modulation of this pathway. Of note, the taxanes, paclitaxel and docetaxel, which are known to stabilize tubulin polymerization, have been shown to synergize with the polyamine analogues as well, albeit under more limited experimental conditions.
In addition, it is noteworthy that the combination of CPENSpm with virtually all of the cytotoxics had synergistic effects in the MCF-7 and T-47D cells. Because these drugs represent a spectrum of different mechanisms of action, their extensive ability to synergize with CPENSpm is intriguing. This result implies that the analogue may be modifying a common pathway by which all of the these drugs work to produce an antitumor response. It is known that most chemotherapeutic agents induce PCD (53 , 54) . Polyamine analogues are also known to induce PCD in multiple tumor types including breast cancer (13 , 14 , 55 , 56) . Studies using the CPENSpm analogue in the H157 human lung cancer cell line have shown that production of oxidative stress via hydrogen peroxide production in the cell because of SSAT induction by this analogue is a component of cell death (47) . Whether this pathway is involved in the synergistic response seen with combination therapy in these cell lines remains to be evaluated.
Finally, both the MCF-7 and T-47D cell lines are estrogen receptor positive and dependent on estradiol for cell growth. It will be important to determine whether other estrogen receptorpositive breast cancer cell lines also demonstrate synergy with CPENSpm and a broad spectrum of cancer chemotherapeutic agents. If this is the case, the role of estrogen receptor-dependent proliferation pathways in breast cancer cells and their association with the activity of polyamine analogues may be important to investigate.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported by grants from The Department of
Defense Breast Cancer Program DAMD 17-99-1-9231 (to N. E. D.),
Department of Defense Breast Cancer Program DAMD17-97-1-7338 (to
H. A. H.), The Breast Cancer Research Foundation (to N. E. D.), The
National Cancer Institute CA51085 (to R. A. C.), The National Cancer
Institute CA85509 (P. M. W.), and The Pearl M. Stetler Research Fund
for Women Physicians (H. A. H.). ![]()
2 Present address: Northwest Georgia Oncology
Centers, P.C.55 Whitcher Street, Suite 300, Marietta, GA 30060. ![]()
3 Present address: Life Technologies, 9800 Medical
Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850. ![]()
4 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, at Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Cancer Research
Building, 1650 Orleans Street, Room 409, Baltimore, MD 21231. Phone:
(410) 955-8489; E-mail: davidna{at}jhmi.edu ![]()
5 The abbreviations used are: DESpm,
N1,N12-diethylspermine
(also known as BESpm,
N1,N12-bis(ethyl)spermine);
DENSPM,
N1-N11-diethylnorspermine
(also known as BENSpm,
N1,N11-bis(ethyl)norspermine);
CPENSpm,
N1-ethyl-N11-[(cyclopropyl)methyl]-4,8-diazaundecane
and CHENSpm,
N1-ethyl-N11-[(cycloheptyl)methyl]4,8-diazaundecane;
BESpd,N1,N8
bis(ethyl)spermidine, c-DDP,
cis-diaminechloroplatinum(II); 5-FU,
5-fluorouracil; FdURd, fluorodeoxyuridine; 4HC,
4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide; DFMO, difluoromethylornithine; MTT,
3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide; CI, combination
index; PCD, programmed cell death; SSAT, spermidine/spermine
N1-acetyl-transferase; MGBG,
methylglyoxal-bis(guanylhydrazone). ![]()
Received 7/20/00; revised 11/20/00; accepted 11/20/00.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-difluoromethylornithine and 5-fluorouracil on the proliferation of a human colon adenocarcinoma cell line.. Cancer Res., 43: 4035-4038, 1983.
-difluoromethylornithine alone and combined with. cis-diaminedichloroplatinum(II). Cancer Res., 44: 5100-5104, 1984.
-difluoromethylornithine and doxorubicin against pancreatic cancer cell lines in culture.. Pancreas, 1: 49-54, 1986.[Medline]
-difluoromethylornithine or (2R,5R)-6-heptyne 2,5-diamine on drug-induced topoisomerase IImediated DNA cleavage and cytotoxicity in human and murine leukemia cells.. Cancer Res., 47: 6437-6443, 1987.
-difluoromethylornithine and cis-diaminedichloroplatinum(II) against human and hamster pancreatic cancer cell lines.. Cancer Res., 47: 2247-2250, 1987.
-difluoromethylornithine and Adriamycin in treatment of rats carrying the Dunning R3327 MAT-LyLu prostatic adenocarcinoma.. Prostate, 11: 87-93, 1987.[Medline]
-difluoromethylornithine on 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea and cis-diaminedichloroplatinum(II) cytotoxicity, DNA interstrand cross-linking, and growth in human brain tumor cell lines in vitro.. Cancer Res., 50: 2769-2772, 1990.
-difluoromethylornithine in human gastric carcinoma cell in vitro. Investig. New Drugs, 8(Suppl.): S9-S18, 1990.
-difluoromethylornithine alone and in combination with 5-fluorouracil and doxorubicin.. J. Surg. Oncol., 48: 34-38, 1991.[Medline]
-difluoromethylornithine and antiestrogens on MCF-7 breast cancer cell line.. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 148: 1338-1345, 1987.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Pledgie-Tracy, M. D. Sobolewski, and N. E. Davidson Sulforaphane induces cell type-specific apoptosis in human breast cancer cell lines Mol. Cancer Ther., March 1, 2007; 6(3): 1013 - 1021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. L. Allen, E. G. McLean, J. Boyer, A. McCulla, P. M. Wilson, V. Coyle, D. B. Longley, R. A. Casero Jr., and P. G. Johnston The role of spermidine/spermine N1-acetyltransferase in determining response to chemotherapeutic agents in colorectal cancer cells Mol. Cancer Ther., January 1, 2007; 6(1): 128 - 137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Wang and R. A. Casero Jr. Mammalian Polyamine Catabolism: A Therapeutic Target, a Pathological Problem, or Both? J. Biochem., January 1, 2006; 139(1): 17 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Pledgie, Y. Huang, A. Hacker, Z. Zhang, P. M. Woster, N. E. Davidson, and R. A. Casero Jr. Spermine Oxidase SMO(PAOh1), Not N1-Acetylpolyamine Oxidase PAO, Is the Primary Source of Cytotoxic H2O2 in Polyamine Analogue-treated Human Breast Cancer Cell Lines J. Biol. Chem., December 2, 2005; 280(48): 39843 - 39851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Marverti, M. G. Monti, A. E. Pegg, D. E. McCloskey, S. Bettuzzi, A. Ligabue, A. Caporali, D. D'Arca, and M. S. Moruzzi Spermidine/spermine N1-acetyltransferase transient overexpression restores sensitivity of resistant human ovarian cancer cells to N1,N12-bis(ethyl)spermine and to cisplatin Carcinogenesis, October 1, 2005; 26(10): 1677 - 1686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Huang, J. C. Keen, E. Hager, R. Smith, A. Hacker, B. Frydman, A. L. Valasinas, V. K. Reddy, L. J. Marton, R. A. Casero Jr., et al. Regulation of Polyamine Analogue Cytotoxicity by c-Jun in Human MDA-MB-435 Cancer Cells Mol. Cancer Res., February 1, 2004; 2(2): 81 - 88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Wolff, D. K. Armstrong, J. H. Fetting, M. K. Carducci, C. D. Riley, J. F. Bender, R. A. Casero Jr., and N. E. Davidson A Phase II Study of the Polyamine Analog N1,N11-Diethylnorspermine (DENSpm) Daily for Five Days Every 21 Days in Patients with Previously Treated Metastatic Breast Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2003; 9(16): 5922 - 5928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Huang, E. R. Hager, D. L. Phillips, V. R. Dunn, A. Hacker, B. Frydman, J. A. Kink, A. L. Valasinas, V. K. Reddy, L. J. Marton, et al. A Novel Polyamine Analog Inhibits Growth and Induces Apoptosis in Human Breast Cancer Cells Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2003; 9(7): 2769 - 2777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |