
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Molecular Oncology |
Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands [H. E., F. G., D. J.], and Departments of Surgery [H. E., B. P., R. G., B. I.] and Medicine [K. M., D. J.], University of Western Australia, Nedlands 6009, Australia
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental Design: A retrospective series of 891 Stage III CRC patients with negative surgical margins was investigated. Thirty percent (270 of 891) received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with curative intent and comprising of 5-fluorouracil/levamisole. Adjuvant treatment and nontreatment patient groups were well matched for tumor site, grade, p53 alterations, and MSI. Surgical tumor specimens were investigated for p53 overexpression using immunohistochemistry and for p53 mutation and MSI using single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis. The predictive value of these markers was evaluated by comparing the survival of adjuvant-treated and nonadjuvant treated patients.
Results: A strong inverse correlation was observed between p53 alteration and MSI (P < 0.0001). In univariate analysis, the factors of sex, site, p53 alteration, and MSI were each strong predictors of a survival benefit from chemotherapy. Multivariate analysis revealed that chemotherapy provided maximal survival benefit for female patients (P = 0.005) and for patients whose tumors contained normal p53 (P = 0.041). Males whose tumors contained a p53 alteration and were negative for MSI appeared not to benefit from chemotherapy.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that p53 alteration and MSI could be clinically useful molecular predictive markers for the identification of CRC patients who might benefit from 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Attributable largely to its central role in tumorigenesis, alteration of the p53 gene has held the most promise as a molecular prognostic and predictive factor with potential clinical utility (4) . Several in vitro and animal studies (5 , 6) have shown that tumor cells with inactivated or mutant p53 are more resistant to cytotoxic agents including 5-FU; however, this has not been a universal finding (7) , possibly because of tumor-type differences in the effects of p53 aberration. In clinical studies, p53 gene mutation has been associated with poor prognosis in two relatively small CRC series in which patients received chemotherapy with curative (8) or palliative (9) intent. The survival rates of patients with or without this genetic alteration were compared and found to be significantly worse for those with p53 mutation. It is impossible to determine from these results whether patients with p53 mutant tumors derive a survival benefit from adjuvant therapy. To investigate this, the survival of patients with a p53 alteration must be compared between adjuvant- and nonadjuvant-treated groups. We are aware of only one study that has carried out such a comparison in CRC (10) . In 104 stage III CRCs from the Southwest Oncology Group, it was observed that patients whose tumors overexpressed the p53 gene derived no significant survival benefit from chemotherapy, whereas those without overexpression did. Overexpression of the p53 protein was presumed to signify the presence of an underlying gene mutation.
In the present study, we assessed the predictive values of both p53 overexpression and p53 gene mutation in a retrospective series of 891 consecutive cases of stage III CRC having negative surgical margins. These were obtained from a single institute over a 14-year period during a time in which chemotherapy was being introduced for the routine management of stage III CRC. The large number of cases analyzed has allowed evaluation of the predictive significance of p53 alteration and MSI.
| PATIENTS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Analysis of p53 Protein Overexpression and Gene Mutation.
Tumors were analyzed for overexpression of p53 protein using the DO-7 monoclonal antibody (Dako, Australia) and an identical IHC protocol to that described earlier (12)
. Antigen retrieval techniques were not used for any of the samples. Scoring for nuclear staining was carried out by two observers who were unaware of patient outcomes. A threshold of 5% of tumor cells showing nuclear staining was used as the cutoff score for positive IHC staining. This threshold has been shown previously (12)
to give the best concordance with p53 mutation. Tumors from 248 patients (92%) who received chemotherapy and from 331 patients (53%) who did not receive chemotherapy were analyzed by IHC. The latter were evenly distributed between site and gender subgroups. Limitations on resources prevented the analysis of all of the tumor samples.
Screening for mutations within exons 48 of the p53 gene was carried out using PCR-SSCP mutation protocols described previously by our laboratory (12, 13, 14) . Excellent concordance between the various isotopic, silver stain, and fluorescent modifications of the SSCP technique for p53 mutation detection has been demonstrated (13 , 14) . Sensitivity of the SSCP technique for the detection of p53 mutations has been estimated at 9095% (15) . DNA for PCR-SSCP analysis was extracted from 10-µm archival tumor sections cut serially to those used for IHC. All of the mutations were confirmed at least once by separate PCR and SSCP runs. Results on p53 mutation were obtained for 246 patients who received chemotherapy (91%) and for 519 patients who did not receive this treatment (84%). Results were not available for all of the tumors because of PCR failure and limitations on tumor DNA. MSI was evaluated in all of the 336 right-sided tumors and in 396 (73%) left-sided tumors using previously described PCR-SSCP methods (16) based upon the detection of deletions within the BAT-26 mononucleotide microsatellite marker. This has been shown to establish MSI status with greater than 99% accuracy (17) .
Statistical Analysis.
Associations between clinicopathological features, adjuvant treatment, and p53 alterations were evaluated using the
2 test. Survival was defined as the time from surgery until death. Patients dying from causes other than recurrence of CRC were censored at the time of death. Surviving patients were censored at the end of follow-up. Univariate survival analysis was conducted using the method of Kaplan and Meier, with the difference between curves evaluated by the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the effect of adjuvant treatment and interactions of this effect with those associated with clinicopathological factors and with the presence or absence of p53 alterations. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata Statistical Software (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Until recently, the factors of site and sex have not been considered as potential predictive factors for CRC. Differences in the embryology and epidemiology (26)
and in the frequency of allelic loss (27)
between left-sided and right-sided colonic epithelia and tumors, respectively, were first noted more than a decade ago. Site-related differences in the frequency of p53 mutation (18)
and MSI (22
, 25)
were also reported in the early to mid-1990s. Although with the benefit of hindsight these differences might be expected to translate into differential survival benefits from chemotherapy, the possibility of tumor site specificity was apparently not considered during the evaluation of results from clinical trials. Sex-related differences in the frequencies of p16 (28)
and hMLH1 (29)
gene methylation have been reported recently and may be related to our observation of a gender difference in the response to chemotherapy (Table 3)
. As suggested previously by our group (2)
, the apparent gender difference in survival benefit from chemotherapy may be attributable to differences in frequency of the methylator phenotype between tumors from males and females.
The data from our study were derived from analysis of a large number of single stage tumors originating from one institute. However, we caution that the retrospective nature of this study makes it impossible to control for several potentially important and confounding factors that may have influenced our findings. Most of the nonadjuvant-treated patients were from the first half of the study period, whereas all of the adjuvant-treated patients were from the second half. We cannot exclude that pathological assessment, surgical practice, and patient management differed between the first and second halves of the study, thereby influencing the observation of a survival benefit from chemotherapy. However, comparison of nonchemotherapy-treated patients from the first and second halves of the study revealed no difference in survival (data not shown), suggesting that any changes in clinical practice have not influenced the outcome for nonchemotherapy-treated stage III CRC. A further possible confounding issue is that a proportion of rectal cancer patients received post-operative radiation therapy. We did not assess the influence of this treatment, however, because the available evidence suggests that post-operative radiation therapy has no impact on overall patient survival (30) .
Confirmation of our findings on site and sex differences in the survival benefit from chemotherapy can be achieved by the evaluation of data from previous clinical trials. However, validation of the strong predictive values observed for p53 and MSI requires molecular analyses of large series of tumors with known adjuvant therapy status and with long-term survival information. Access to tumor specimens from previous clinical trials of adjuvant therapy is difficult because of the large number of institutions that are often involved in such studies. The present study highlights the importance of collecting tumor specimens from prospective trials so that various somatic genetic alterations can be evaluated for their prognostic and predictive significance.
As seen in the results from Table 2
, p53 overexpression and p53 mutation provide similar predictive information. The concordance between the two techniques (IHC+/SSCP+ and IHC-/SSCP-) was 70% (197 of 280). No additional predictive information was apparent from the use of both markers (both alterations present or either alteration present). Which type of p53 screening is more suitable for routine analysis? IHC is technically simple and relatively inexpensive; however, there is wide variation in the protocols used in the literature. Our laboratory uses the DO-7 monoclonal antibody without prior antigen retrieval treatments. This gives distinct nuclear staining but is often quite variable in intensity both within and between positive tumors. The "cutoff" threshold used to score positive staining (5% of nuclear cells showing reaction product) is necessarily a subjective assessment. Our experience has been that a 5% threshold gives the strongest prognostic value as well as the best concordance with p53 mutation (12)
. A further limitation of IHC is that the different fixatives used in various laboratories can influence the intensity of staining. Standardization and quality control measures would obviously be required if p53 IHC is to be used as a routine marker. Direct molecular screening for p53 mutation using relatively simple SSCP-based methods such as those used in the present study (13
, 14)
may provide a more objective assessment of p53 status. PCR-SSCP can be carried out on routinely processed tumor specimens (13)
and may also be more amenable to standardization (14)
. DNA sequencing is currently too expensive to be used for routine p53 mutation screening, but it has the advantage over SSCP of being able to identify the type of mutation. This has been shown in several different tumor types to influence the response to chemotherapy (31
, 32)
.
In view of the strong inverse correlation between MSI+ and p53 alteration (Ref. 23
and Table 1
), it is perhaps not surprising to find that the former is associated with a good survival benefit from chemotherapy (Fig. 2
; Table 2
). MSI+ tumors are found predominantly in the right-sided colon (22
, 23
, 25)
where they comprise about 2025% of stage III cases. They are frequently poorly differentiated (23)
, and it was interesting to note that patients with poorly differentiated tumors appear to derive the most benefit from chemotherapy (Table 2)
. It has been estimated that approximately 70% of MSI+ tumors belong to a larger "methylator" phenotype (33)
that is characterized by aberrant methylation of CpG-rich promoter regions in genes including hMLH1 (29
, 34)
and p16 (28
, 33)
. This phenotype is found in both left-sided and right-sided tumors, and future work may reveal that it too has important predictive value in CRC.
The present work confirms and extends the results of Ahnen et al. (10) who reported no survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III CRC patients with p53 overexpression. These clinical observations support in vitro and animal studies showing that CRC cell lines with inactivated p53 were strikingly resistant to the effects of 5-FU (6) . It remains to be established whether the chemoresistance of CRC patients with p53 alteration is directly attributable to p53-related defects in apoptosis and/or cell cycle checkpoints. An alternate explanation is that p53 alterations are associated with an as yet unidentified tumor phenotype that is resistant to chemotherapy. The in vitro and clinical results observed for CRC suggest that p53 alterations may have strong predictive value in other tumor types that are also treated with adjuvant therapies. Evidence in support of this has been presented for breast (31 , 35) , head and neck squamous cell (32) , and esophageal (36) carcinomas. Whether cancer patients with p53-altered tumors derive any survival benefit from chemotherapy can only be determined by the inclusion of this marker in prospective, randomized trials. A finding of no response would suggest that such patients should be considered for entry into future trials designed to evaluate the efficacy of non-p53-dependent cytotoxic agents.
On the basis of results presented in this and previous work (2 , 10) , we propose that sex, MSI, and p53 alteration may be important predictive factors in stage III CRC and could be used to identify patient subgroups who derive significant benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. These factors may also prove useful in identifying subgroups of stage II and IV CRC patients who are currently not being offered chemotherapy on a routine basis and who might stand to gain from this therapy.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported by the Cancer Foundation of Western Australia and the Raine Medical Research Foundation. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Surgery, University of Western Australia, Nedlands 6907, Australia. Fax: 61-9-346-2416; E-mail: bjiac{at}cyllene.uwa.edu.au ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: CRC, colorectal cancer; 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; MSI, microsatellite instability; IHC, immunohistochemistry; SSCP, single-strand conformation polymorphism; CI, confidence interval. ![]()
Received 11/20/00; revised 1/29/01; accepted 1/29/01.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. C. Pezo, S. J. Gandhi, L. A. Shirley, R. G. Pestell, L. H. Augenlicht, and R. H. Singer Single-Cell Transcription Site Activation Predicts Chemotherapy Response in Human Colorectal Tumors Cancer Res., July 1, 2008; 68(13): 4977 - 4982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Soong, N. Shah, M. Salto-Tellez, B. C. Tai, R. A. Soo, H. C. Han, S. S. Ng, W. L. Tan, N. Zeps, D. Joseph, et al. Prognostic significance of thymidylate synthase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and thymidine phosphorylase protein expression in colorectal cancer patients treated with or without 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy Ann. Onc., May 1, 2008; 19(5): 915 - 919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Suehiro, C. W. Wong, L. R. Chirieac, Y. Kondo, L. Shen, C. R. Webb, Y. W. Chan, A. S.Y. Chan, T. L. Chan, T.-T. Wu, et al. Epigenetic-Genetic Interactions in the APC/WNT, RAS/RAF, and P53 Pathways in Colorectal Carcinoma Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2008; 14(9): 2560 - 2569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z.-Z. Zhu, A.-Z. Wang, H.-R. Jia, X.-X. Jin, X.-L. He, L.-F. Hou, and G. Zhu Association of the TP53 Codon 72 Polymorphism with Colorectal Cancer in a Chinese Population Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2007; 37(5): 385 - 390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. P. Kim, L. H. Colangelo, H. S. Wieand, S. Paik, I. R. Kirsch, N. Wolmark, and C. J. Allegra Prognostic and Predictive Roles of High-Degree Microsatellite Instability in Colon Cancer: A National Cancer Institute-National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Collaborative Study J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2007; 25(7): 767 - 772. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J M Carethers Authors' reply. Gut, December 1, 2006; 55(12): 1819 - 1819. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Y. Locker, S. Hamilton, J. Harris, J. M. Jessup, N. Kemeny, J. S. Macdonald, M. R. Somerfield, D. F. Hayes, and R. C. Bast Jr ASCO 2006 Update of Recommendations for the Use of Tumor Markers in Gastrointestinal Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., November 20, 2006; 24(33): 5313 - 5327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B Iacopetta and T Watanabe Predictive value of microsatellite instability for benefit from adjuvant fluorouracil chemotherapy in colorectal cancer. Gut, November 1, 2006; 55(11): 1671 - 1672. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Tort, J. Bartkova, M. Sehested, T. Orntoft, J. Lukas, and J. Bartek Retinoblastoma Pathway Defects Show Differential Ability to Activate the Constitutive DNA Damage Response in Human Tumorigenesis Cancer Res., November 1, 2006; 66(21): 10258 - 10263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Giacchetti, G. Bjarnason, C. Garufi, D. Genet, S. Iacobelli, M. Tampellini, R. Smaaland, C. Focan, B. Coudert, Y. Humblet, et al. Phase III Trial Comparing 4-Day Chronomodulated Therapy Versus 2-Day Conventional Delivery of Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin As First-Line Chemotherapy of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Chronotherapy Group J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 2006; 24(22): 3562 - 3569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B Iacopetta, W Q Li, F Grieu, A Ruszkiewicz, and K Kawakami BRAF mutation and gene methylation frequencies of colorectal tumours with microsatellite instability increase markedly with patient age. Gut, August 1, 2006; 55(8): 1213 - 1213. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Watanabe, T. Kanazawa, Y. Kazama, J. Tanaka, T. Tanaka, S. Ishihara, and H. Nagawa TP53 Mutation and Microsatellite Instability Status for the Prediction of Survival in Adjuvant-Treated Colon Cancer Patients J. Clin. Oncol., December 10, 2005; 23(35): 9031 - 9032. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Westra, M. Schaapveld, H. Hollema, J. P. de Boer, M. M.J. Kraak, D. de Jong, A. ter Elst, N. H. Mulder, C. H.C.M. Buys, R. M.W. Hofstra, et al. Determination of TP53 Mutation Is More Relevant Than Microsatellite Instability Status for the Prediction of Disease-Free Survival in Adjuvant-Treated Stage III Colon Cancer Patients J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2005; 23(24): 5635 - 5643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Ricciardiello, C. Ceccarelli, G. Angiolini, M. Pariali, P. Chieco, P. Paterini, G. Biasco, G. N. Martinelli, E. Roda, and F. Bazzoli High Thymidylate Synthase Expression in Colorectal Cancer with Microsatellite Instability: Implications for Chemotherapeutic Strategies Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2005; 11(11): 4234 - 4240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Popat, R. Hubner, and R.S. Houlston Systematic Review of Microsatellite Instability and Colorectal Cancer Prognosis J. Clin. Oncol., January 20, 2005; 23(3): 609 - 618. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Licitra, S. Suardi, P. Bossi, L.D. Locati, L. Mariani, P. Quattrone, S. Lo Vullo, M. Oggionni, P. Olmi, G. Cantu, et al. Prediction of TP53 Status for Primary Cisplatin, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin Chemotherapy in Ethmoid Sinus Intestinal-Type Adenocarcinoma J. Clin. Oncol., December 15, 2004; 22(24): 4901 - 4906. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K-J Sohn, F Smirnakis, D N Moskovitz, P Novakovic, Z Yates, M Lucock, R Croxford, and Y-I Kim Effects of folylpolyglutamate synthetase modulation on chemosensitivity of colon cancer cells to 5-fluorouracil and methotrexate Gut, December 1, 2004; 53(12): 1825 - 1831. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Boyer, E. G. McLean, S. Aroori, P. Wilson, A. McCulla, P. D. Carey, D. B. Longley, and P. G. Johnston Characterization of p53 Wild-Type and Null Isogenic Colorectal Cancer Cell Lines Resistant to 5-Fluorouracil, Oxaliplatin, and Irinotecan Clin. Cancer Res., March 15, 2004; 10(6): 2158 - 2167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Mariadason, D. Arango, Q. Shi, A. J. Wilson, G. A. Corner, C. Nicholas, M. J. Aranes, M. Lesser, E. L. Schwartz, and L. H. Augenlicht Gene Expression Profiling-Based Prediction of Response of Colon Carcinoma Cells to 5-Fluorouracil and Camptothecin Cancer Res., December 15, 2003; 63(24): 8791 - 8812. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Ward, K. Cheong, S.-L. Ku, A. Meagher, T. O'Connor, and N. J. Hawkins Adverse Prognostic Effect of Methylation in Colorectal Cancer Is Reversed by Microsatellite Instability J. Clin. Oncol., October 15, 2003; 21(20): 3729 - 3736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Colombino, A. Cossu, A. Arba, A. Manca, A. Curci, A. Avallone, G. Comella, G. Botti, F. Scintu, M. Amoruso, et al. Microsatellite instability and mutation analysis among southern Italian patients with colorectal carcinoma: detection of different alterations accounting for MLH1 and MSH2 inactivation in familial cases Ann. Onc., October 1, 2003; 14(10): 1530 - 1536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. van Rijnsoever, H. Elsaleh, D. Joseph, K. McCaul, and B. Iacopetta CpG Island Methylator Phenotype Is an Independent Predictor of Survival Benefit from 5-Fluorouracil in Stage III Colorectal Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2003; 9(8): 2898 - 2903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Chung and A. K. Rustgi The Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer Syndrome: Genetics and Clinical Implications Ann Intern Med, April 1, 2003; 138(7): 560 - 570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N J Maughan and P Quirke Pathology - a molecular prognostic approach: Advances in colorectal cancer Br. Med. Bull., December 1, 2002; 64(1): 59 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M van Rijnsoever, F Grieu, H Elsaleh, D Joseph, and B Iacopetta Characterisation of colorectal cancers showing hypermethylation at multiple CpG islands Gut, December 1, 2002; 51(6): 797 - 802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||