
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Experimental Therapeutics, Preclinical Pharmacology |
Department of Oncology [R. A. S., K. A. H., M. L. W., W. P. S.] and MRC Centre for Mechanisms of Human Toxicity [C. R. I., R. D. V., C. L., M. M. M., A. G.], University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 9HN, Untied Kingdom, and Vanderbilt Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232 [L. J. M.]
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B and activator protein-1 (8)
, and suppression of expression of the enzyme COX-23
(9)
.
In a program of preclinical work designed to help optimize the clinical evaluation of curcumin as a colon cancer chemopreventive agent, we tested the hypothesis that curcumin in the diet alters biomarkers of its chemopreventive efficacy. Three biomarkers were selected to represent possible mechanisms of the chemopreventive activity of curcumin in vivo. These were total GST activity, DNA adducts formed by MDA, and inducible COX-2 expression as reflected by PGE2 production. Induction of GSTs, phase II enzymes that detoxify certain carcinogens, is regarded as a potential mechanism of blockade of the early stages of carcinogenesis (3)
. Such induction is a property of several agents with chemopreventive activity in preclinical models, including curcumin (10)
and the broccoli constituent sulforaphane (11)
. MDA is a naturally occurring product of lipid peroxidation (12)
, which is also formed during prostaglandin biosynthesis via COX (13)
, two enzymatic processes that have been implicated in the pathogenesis of a number of cancers, especially colon cancer (14, 15, 16)
. PGE2 is a product of COX-2, the isoenzyme of COX induced during infection, inflammation, and malignant transformation. Inhibition of COX-2 is thought to be an important mechanism of chemoprevention, exhibited by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (14)
and dietary agents such as curcumin (9)
. MDA reacts with DNA under physiological conditions to form adducts, predominantly with deoxyguanosine (M1G). Accumulated DNA damage may be important in the etiology of many cancers, and such damage may be reflected by exocyclic DNA adducts such as M1G (17)
. M1G has been implicated in the induction of G
T transversions by MDA and is considered a potentially useful "dosimeter" of MDA-induced DNA modification (18)
. M1G levels have been described in malignant and nonmalignant human colon cells in vitro4
and in leukocytes, pancreas, breast, and liver in healthy volunteers (12)
; indeed they are comparable with levels of DNA adducts formed by exogenous carcinogens such as polycyclic hydrocarbons.
The ability of curcumin to prevent malignancies in the colorectal tract in rodents has been particularly well documented (7 , 19 , 20) . It has also been shown to inhibit lipid peroxidation (21) and carbon tetrachloride-mediated hepatotoxicity (22 , 23) . We therefore aimed to test the hypothesis that dietary curcumin affects GST and M1G levels in the intestinal mucosa and prevents increases in M1G levels when lipid peroxidation is induced in this tissue by CCl4. For comparison, levels of GST and M1G were also investigated in liver and blood leukocytes. Because COX-2 is not expressed significantly in normal tissues without provocation, an ex vivo model was used to study its inducibility in peripheral blood indirectly. To be able to rationalize potential pharmacodynamic changes and interpret them in terms of efficacious drug levels, curcumin and its glucuronide or sulfate conjugation products were determined in intestinal mucosa, plasma, and liver. Studies in rodents suggest that curcumin has poor systemic bioavailability when given p.o. and is cleared rapidly from the plasma when administered i.v. (24) , but overall the information on its pharmacokinetic behavior is scarce. Whereas in cancer intervention studies using curcumin it has generally been administered admixed in the diet, studies of its pharmacokinetics and metabolism have used i.g. gavage or non-oral routes of administration. In the light of the difficult pharmaceutical properties of curcumin, i.e., its lipophilicity and susceptibility to rapid metabolism, we also tested the hypothesis that drug and metabolite levels after i.g. gavage are representative of those following curcumin ingestion in the diet.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Treatments.
Female F344 rats (6-weeks of age; 160180 g), obtained from Charles River UK Ltd. (Margate, United Kingdom) had access to water and a standard RMI diet (Special Diet Services) ad libitum. Rats were kept in groups of four per cage at 20°C on a 12-h light/dark cycle. For dietary administration, curcumin and corn oil were mixed with the diet to furnish 2% for each. This level of curcumin in the diet, which rats received for 14 days, has been shown previously to prevent gastrointestinal tract tumors in several rodent models of chemically induced carcinogenesis (5
, 10)
. Control animals received a diet containing corn oil. CCl4 was dissolved in corn oil (2 ml/kg) and administered by i.g. gavage at 0.5 ml/kg on day 10 after commencement of dietary curcumin intake. This dose of CCl4 has been shown previously to raise liver M1G levels (18)
. Control animals received the equivalent dose of corn oil.
In the pharmacokinetic study, administration of dietary curcumin was compared with that of an i.g. bolus. For administration by gavage, curcumin was suspended and partially dissolved in a mixture of glycerol formal:cremophore:water (5:2:2), which in preliminary experiments was found to yield a suitable formulation in terms of acceptable viscosity and stability of suspension. This formulation was administered at 500 mg curcumin/kg by i.g. gavage once only or daily for 7 consecutive days. Control animals received the excipient mixture only. Tissue samples were collected 30 min postdose, a time point at which in preliminary experiments curcumin levels had been found to be maximal. For an optimal comparison of this administration mode with dietary curcumin, we exploited the fact that feeding habits of rats are subject to a diurnal cycle with two eating peaks, one of which occurs at around 8:00 p.m. (27)
. Rats were deprived of food for 6 h, commencing at 1:00 p.m. They then received the curcumin-containing diet for 3 h, coinciding with the eating peak. Subsequently, food was withdrawn for
30 min, after which blood and tissue samples were collected. This "starvation-refeeding" protocol was performed either in unpretreated animals or in rats that had received the curcumin diet continually for 7 days.
At the end of the feeding period, or subsequent to i.g. administration, rats were subjected to terminal anesthesia (halothane/nitrous oxide), and blood was removed by cardiac puncture. Blood was placed in heparinized tubes and plasma obtained by centrifugation (1100 x g at 4°C for 25 min). The large intestine was flushed with PBS and dissected out. Cytosol was prepared by standard procedures (28) , and blood leukocytes were isolated using Ficoll-Paque Plus (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom). Histological examination ensured accurate scraping of colonic mucosa only. Blood and tissue samples were protected from light, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C until pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic analyses were performed.
Pharmacodynamic Analyses.
Total GST activity of cytosol samples was measured spectrophotometrically using glutathione and CDNB (29)
. Results were corrected for protein levels using the Bio-Rad protein assay (Bio-Rad, Hemel Hempstead, United Kingdom). Extraction of genomic DNA and analysis of M1G adduct levels by immunoslot blot was performed as described previously (30)
. Discrepancies in the amount of DNA in each slot were corrected by staining the nitrocellulose filter with propidium iodide and performing UV light densitometry. The detection limit for M1G was five adducts per 108 nucleotides. The model for assessing inducibility of COX-2 ex vivo was based on published methods and has been well established in clinical studies as well as preclinical models (31
, 32)
. Aliquots (0.5 ml) of fresh blood were incubated with acetylsalicylic acid (200 µM) for 30 min at 37°C to inactivate platelet COX-1 irreversibly. LPS (10 µg/ml) was added to half the samples and mixed well, and samples were reincubated for 24 h. Plasma was separated by centrifugation and stored at -80°C. PGE2 in these plasma samples was measured by competitive enzyme immunoassay (Cayman Chemicals, Ann Arbor, MI), with a detection limit of
30 pg/ml plasma.
Analysis of Curcumin and Its Conjugates.
Curcumin and its metabolites were measured as described before (24)
. Plasma and tissues were extracted with twice the volume of ethyl acetate, and the organic layer was evaporated under nitrogen. Extraction efficiencies from plasma for curcumin, curcumin glucuronide, and curcumin sulfate determined by HPLC (see below) at 0.1 µg/ml were 92 ± 7, 45 ± 10, and 49 ± 9% (mean ± SD, n = 6), respectively; the extraction efficiencies at 40 µg/ml were very similar to these values. Extraction efficiencies from liver and colon mucosal scrapings were not significantly different from those obtained in plasma. The reversed-phase HPLC method for detection and quantitation of curcumin and its conjugates used a Symmetry Shield RP 18 column (150 x 3.9 mm; particle size, 5 µm; Waters) and a Varian Prostar (230 model) solvent delivery system coupled to a UV-visible detector (310 model) and autosampler (model 410). Detection of curcumin, curcumin sulfate, and curcumin glucuronide was achieved at 420 nm. For the detection of products of curcumin reduction, the detector was switched to 280 nm. 5,10,15,20-Tetra-(m-hydrophenyl)-chlorin was used as an internal standard. Samples were reconstituted in acetonitrile:water (1:1), and the injection volume was 50 µl. A linear gradient of 545% acetonitrile in 0.01% ammonium acetate (pH 4.5) was used for 30 min, followed by an increase over 20 min to 95% acetonitrile (flow rate, 1 ml/min). The limits of detection for curcumin, curcumin glucuronide, and curcumin sulfate were 5 pmol/ml plasma or 25 pmol/g tissue, and the limits of quantitation were near 10 pmol/ml plasma and 50 pmol/g tissue. Quantitation of the conjugates was based on calibration curves obtained for curcumin, because we had established previously that the specific absorption at 420 nm was almost identical for the three compounds (24)
. The quantitative method for curcumin was validated using a 0.1 and 40 µg/ml solution yielding intra-day and inter-day coefficients of variation of 17 and 13%, and 16 and 19%, respectively (n = 4).
Statistical Evaluation.
Results were subjected to ANOVA and Spearmans test of rank correlation, using Excel and Minitab (both Windows 1997) software packages. Post hoc Fishers Least Significant Difference Test was performed.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
3-fold, but curcumin feeding failed to interfere with this increase (result not shown).
Levels of Curcumin after Dietary Administration.
Plasma, colon mucosa, and liver from rats that had received curcumin in their diet as described above for 2 weeks were analyzed for the presence of curcuminoids. Curcumin and its metabolites, curcumin glucuronide and curcumin sulfate, could not be detected in the plasma obtained by cardiac puncture or from the hepatic portal vein. Levels of curcumin were 1.8 ± 0.8 µmol/g tissue in the colon mucosa and 0.8 ± 0.3 nmol/g in the liver. Curcumin was also present in the feces (8.6 ± 0.6 µmol/g dried feces). Curcumin glucuronide or curcumin sulfate was not detected in either tissues or feces.
Pharmacokinetic Comparison of Modes of Administration.
To compare the availability of curcumin admixed with the diet or suspended in an amphiphilic solvent and administered by i.g. bolus, we studied drug levels after short-term feeding (2% in the diet for 3 h) or single i.g. bolus (500 mg/kg) and after continual feeding or repeated bolus administration for 7 days. To render the dietary dose ingested and the sample timing comparable with those associated with the i.g. bolus, we exploited the "starvation-refeeding" protocol described in "Materials and Methods." The dose ingested with the diet during the refeeding period, as adjudged by the amount of food removed from the hoppers, was between 200 and 400 mg/kg, i.e., between 40 and 80% of, and thus comparable with, the i.g. dose. Tables 2
and 3
show that the levels of curcumin and its conjugates differed substantially, depending on the mode of administration. Plasma levels of curcumin were approximately three to five times higher after the i.g. bolus than after dietary ingestion, and curcumin conjugates were observed in the plasma only when the agent was given via the i.g. route (Table 2)
. Repeated i.g. administration for 7 days led to an increase in plasma levels of curcumin and its conjugates as compared with single i.g. administration. Curcumin levels were doubled, and levels of curcumin sulfate and curcumin glucuronide were 2.7 and 11 times higher than those seen after single i.g. administration. In contrast, plasma levels of curcumin after its consumption in the diet for a week, at the end of which rats were subjected to the starvation-refeeding regime, did not differ substantially from those measured after short-term dietary consumption. The variation between animals in colon mucosal curcumin levels (Table 3)
after dietary consumption was very high, probably reflecting considerable differences in food intake between individual animals during the 3-h period of refeeding. Curcumin levels in the colon mucosa after short-term dietary consumption were 164 times higher than those seen after single i.g. bolus; after dietary consumption for 1 week, they were 27 times higher than after the last of seven daily i.g. bolus doses (Table 3)
. Liver levels of curcumin were
0.1 nmol/g, irrespective of route of administration, and there was little difference in liver levels between single or repeated administration via the diet or gavage.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The first conclusion is based on the observed differences in levels of curcumin and its conjugates in plasma and tissues after the two administration modes. Dietary curcumin elicited concentrations of the drug in the colon mucosa of between 0.3 and 1.8 µmol/g, whereas plasma levels were around the limit of detection. Curcumin suspended in a solvent mixture and given by i.g. bolus furnished levels of drug in the plasma that were 36-fold higher than those seen after dietary administration. Curcumin metabolites were detectable in the plasma only after i.g. administration. Conversely, colon mucosal levels of curcumin after i.g. bolus were only a fraction of those observed after dietary administration.
Curcumin exerts its effects on growth, COX-2 expression, and transcription factor activity in cells in vitro at concentrations of 5 µM or above (9) . The colon mucosal level of curcumin after 14 days feeding observed in this study, 1.8 µmol/g, is more than 300-fold higher than the minimal concentration shown to be active in vitro. This result demonstrates that dietary administration of curcumin can produce pharmacologically relevant drug concentrations in colon mucosa. Although the dose used in this study, 2% in the diet, has been used frequently in rodent intervention studies (5 , 10 , 33) , it is at least 10 times higher than the highest estimated daily human intake of curcumin as a dietary constituent (4) and does not reflect normal dietary use. In recent intervention studies, dietary levels of 0.2 and 0.1% curcumin have been demonstrated to protect rodents from colon cancer induced by azoxymethane (7 , 19 , 20) and to reduce polyp numbers in the Min mouse (34) , a model of the genetic defect found in human familial adenomatous polyposis. Our results therefore intimate that dietary curcumin at doses considerably lower than those used here might yield pharmacologically efficacious levels in the colon mucosa and perhaps also in the liver.
Intriguingly, curcumin glucuronide and curcumin sulfate were not detected in plasma or tissues after its administration in the diet, whereas they were the major drug-derived species present in the plasma after i.g. administration. In a recent report, a small amount of a curcumin reduction product, tetrahydrocurcumin, was found in plasma samples from rats fed a curcumin-containing diet (1%) subsequent to treatment of plasma with enzymes that hydrolyze xenobiotic glucuronides and sulfates (35) . In contrast, products of curcumin reduction were not unequivocally detected in plasma after dietary curcumin given for 14 days in the experiments described here, although hexahydrocurcumin and hexahydrocurcuminol were identified by mass spectrometry in the bile.5 Overall, this part of the study suggests that the pharmacokinetic behavior of curcumin after administration of an i.g. bolus of curcumin in suspension is clearly unrepresentative of that of curcumin mixed into the diet. This finding is important because, although in intervention studies curcumin is generally given as a constituent of the diet, studies of its pharmacokinetics and metabolism have been performed mostly with the drug formulated in suspension, using DMSO, aqueous carboxymethyl cellulose solution, or arachis oil as solvents, and administered as an i.g. bolus or via the i.p. route (36, 37, 38, 39) . The results presented here suggest that should oral curcumin be advocated in the chemoprevention of malignancies remote from the liver or gastrointestinal tract, improvement of its oral bioavailability might be necessary, perhaps by formulating it as a solution.
Our second conclusion is borne out by the findings that dietary curcumin elevated hepatic GST levels, reduced colon mucosal M1G adduct levels, and decreased the elevation of M1G adduct levels elicited by a powerful lipid peroxidative stimulus in the liver and colon mucosa. These potentially beneficial effects correlated with curcumin levels of 1.8 µmol/g in the colon mucosa and 0.8 nmol/g in liver. The high concentrations of curcumin in the colon mucosa described here are consistent with the outcome of intervention studies in preclinical rodent models of colon cancer (7 , 19 , 20 , 34) . Although the decrease in M1G levels in colon mucosa was modest, it underlines in principle that curcumin supplementation of the diet can achieve drug concentrations sufficient to decrease levels of DNA adducts formed as a corollary of lipid peroxidation. Curcumin glucuronide and curcumin sulfate were not found in liver or colon mucosa after dietary administration of curcumin, strongly suggesting that parent curcumin rather than either conjugate affects GST activities and M1G adduct levels in vivo.
The levels of M1G adducts in rat liver measured here were approximately three times higher than those described previously in Sprague Dawley rats and are more analogous to background levels found in normal human liver (18) . Differences may be related to the age, sex, and strain of the animals used, or fat composition of the diets used. M1G adduct levels in rat leukocytes and colon mucosa have not been documented previously. CCl4 has been shown to increase MDA and M1G adduct levels in rat liver (18) , and increases in hepatic MDA levels have been attenuated by feeding rats 100 mg/kg curcumin for 4 weeks (23) . The results described here extend these findings, because they show that CCl4 also engenders M1G adducts in the colon mucosa, and that this increase can be prevented by dietary curcumin. These findings are pertinent in the light of a recent study in which oxidative DNA damage linked to lipid peroxidation was detected in biopsies from normal human colon (40) . The M1G-lowering effect of curcumin provides a tentative rationale for the regular use of dietary curcumin in the protection of the colon mucosa against oxidative damage, perhaps in premalignant conditions such as ulcerative colitis.
Liver GST activity was raised over controls after curcumin ingestion in the diet. The effects of curcumin on GST and its expression are complex and may involve competitive enzyme inhibition (41) as well as indirect enzyme induction (42) . Our finding that 14 days of dietary curcumin induces GST activity in the liver is consistent with an earlier study of the same dose of curcumin in diet and water fed to 8-week-old mice (10) . Similarly, mice that received curcumin dissolved in aqueous sodium carboxymethylcellulose via i.g. gavage for 15 days at a dose approximately one-fifth of that used here were found to have significantly higher GST levels in liver compared with controls (41) . In contrast, in a more recent study of 8-week-old Sprague Dawley rats, curcumin dissolved in corn oil given daily for 14 days via the i.g. route at various doses failed to induce hepatic GST at doses >6% of the dietary dose used here (43) . This discrepancy may relate to differences between the studies in rodent species and strain, age of the animals, dose of curcumin, and its route of administration. Compatible with earlier rodent studies of dietary curcumin (10 , 44) , we failed to detect any significant alteration in GST activity in the colonic mucosa.
In cells in vitro, we have shown previously that curcumin inhibits COX-2 expression by a mechanism involving interference with nuclear factor-
B activation and inhibition of the I
B kinase complex (9)
. In the study described here, PGE2 production induced ex vivo as an indicator of leukocyte COX-2 activity was not affected by dietary curcumin. The fact that curcumin administered in the diet did not affect COX-2 inducibility, GST activity, or M1G levels in rat blood leukocytes is consistent with the finding that this mode of administration furnished extremely low levels of parent curcumin in the plasma.
In conclusion, the results presented above show that dietary administration of curcumin to rats produces pharmacologically active levels of unmetabolized curcumin in the colon mucosa and liver, capable of decreasing M1G levels and elevating GST activity. These effects may contribute to cancer chemoprevention. The results also suggest that dietary admixture may be the preferable mode of administration for curcumin in the chemoprevention of colon cancer. The chemopreventive efficacy of oral curcumin in the colorectum and the liver merits clinical evaluation.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported in part by a Leicester Royal Infirmary Research Fellowship (to R. A. S.), United Kingdom Ministry for Agriculture, Fisheries, and Food Contract FS1735 (to C. L.), and NIH Grant CA-77839 (to L. J. M.). ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Oncology Department, Hodgkin Building, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 9HN, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-116-252-5541; Fax: 44-116-252-5616; E-mail: ras20{at}le.ac.uk ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: COX, cyclooxygenase; GST, glutathione S-transferase; MDA, malondialdehyde; PG, prostaglandin; M1G, malondialdehyde-deoxyguanosine adduct; HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; CDNB, 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene as substrate; i.g., intragastric. ![]()
4 R. A. Sharma, A. Gescher, J. P. Plastaras, C. Leuratti, R. Singh, L. J. Marnett, W. P. Steward, and S. M. Plummer. Role of cyclooxygenase-2 in modulation of malondialdehyde levels and its deoxyguanosine adduct in human colon cells. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), submitted for publication. ![]()
Received 12/ 8/00; revised 1/31/01; accepted 2/ 5/01.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B activation via the NIK/IKK signaling complex. Oncogene, 18: 6013-6020, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. K. Vareed, M. Kakarala, M. T. Ruffin, J. A. Crowell, D. P. Normolle, Z. Djuric, and D. E. Brenner Pharmacokinetics of Curcumin Conjugate Metabolites in Healthy Human Subjects Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2008; 17(6): 1411 - 1417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Garg, S. Gupta, and G. B. Maru Dietary curcumin modulates transcriptional regulators of phase I and phase II enzymes in benzo[a]pyrene-treated mice: mechanism of its anti-initiating action Carcinogenesis, May 1, 2008; 29(5): 1022 - 1032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Shankar and R. K. Srivastava Bax and Bak genes are essential for maximum apoptotic response by curcumin, a polyphenolic compound and cancer chemopreventive agent derived from turmeric, Curcuma longa Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2007; 28(6): 1277 - 1286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Cao, L. Jia, H.-M. Zhou, Y. Liu, and L.-F. Zhong Mitochondrial and Nuclear DNA Damage Induced by Curcumin in Human Hepatoma G2 Cells Toxicol. Sci., June 1, 2006; 91(2): 476 - 483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Chirnomas, T. Taniguchi, M. de la Vega, A. P. Vaidya, M. Vasserman, A.-R. Hartman, R. Kennedy, R. Foster, J. Mahoney, M. V. Seiden, et al. Chemosensitization to cisplatin by inhibitors of the Fanconi anemia/BRCA pathway. Mol. Cancer Ther., April 1, 2006; 5(4): 952 - 961. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bengmark Curcumin, An Atoxic Antioxidant and Natural NF{kappa}B, Cyclooxygenase-2, Lipooxygenase, and Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Inhibitor: A Shield Against Acute and Chronic Diseases JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, January 1, 2006; 30(1): 45 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-C. Jeong, J. Nakamura, P. B. Upton, and J. A. Swenberg Pyrimido[1,2-a]-purin-10(3H)-one, M1G, is less prone to artifact than base oxidation Nucleic Acids Res., November 10, 2005; 33(19): 6426 - 6434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. P. Collett and F. C. Campbell Curcumin induces c-jun N-terminal kinase-dependent apoptosis in HCT116 human colon cancer cells Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2004; 25(11): 2183 - 2189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Sharma, S. A. Euden, S. L. Platton, D. N. Cooke, A. Shafayat, H. R. Hewitt, T. H. Marczylo, B. Morgan, D. Hemingway, S. M. Plummer, et al. Phase I Clinical Trial of Oral Curcumin: Biomarkers of Systemic Activity and Compliance Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2004; 10(20): 6847 - 6854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Song, N. D. Sonawane, D. Salinas, L. Qian, N. Pedemonte, L. J. V. Galietta, and A. S. Verkman Evidence against the Rescue of Defective {Delta}F508-CFTR Cellular Processing by Curcumin in Cell Culture and Mouse Models J. Biol. Chem., September 24, 2004; 279(39): 40629 - 40633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Moos, K. Edes, J. E. Mullally, and F. A. Fitzpatrick Curcumin impairs tumor suppressor p53 function in colon cancer cells Carcinogenesis, September 1, 2004; 25(9): 1611 - 1617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Brink, M. P. Weijenberg, A. F. P. M. de Goeij, L. J. Schouten, F. D. H. Koedijk, G. M. J. M. Roemen, M. H. F. M. Lentjes, A. P. de Bruine, R.A. Goldbohm, and P. A. van den Brandt Fat and K-ras mutations in sporadic colorectal cancer in The Netherlands Cohort Study Carcinogenesis, September 1, 2004; 25(9): 1619 - 1628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. K. Basu, M. Ciotti, M. S. Hwang, L. Kole, P. S. Mitra, J. W. Cho, and I. S. Owens Differential and Special Properties of the Major Human UGT1-encoded Gastrointestinal UDP-glucuronosyltransferases Enhance Potential to Control Chemical Uptake J. Biol. Chem., January 9, 2004; 279(2): 1429 - 1441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W Lampe Spicing up a vegetarian diet: chemopreventive effects of phytochemicals Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2003; 78(3): 579S - 583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Niedernhofer, J. S. Daniels, C. A. Rouzer, R. E. Greene, and L. J. Marnett Malondialdehyde, a Product of Lipid Peroxidation, Is Mutagenic in Human Cells J. Biol. Chem., August 15, 2003; 278(33): 31426 - 31433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Perkins, R. D. Verschoyle, K. Hill, I. Parveen, M. D. Threadgill, R. A. Sharma, M. L. Williams, W. P. Steward, and A. J. Gescher Chemopreventive Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics of Curcumin in the Min/+ Mouse, a Model of Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2002; 11(6): 535 - 540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Plummer, K. A. Hill, M. F. W. Festing, W. P. Steward, A. J. Gescher, and R. A. Sharma Clinical Development of Leukocyte Cyclooxygenase 2 Activity as a Systemic Biomarker for Cancer Chemopreventive Agents Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2001; 10(12): 1295 - 1299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Sharma, A. Gescher, J. P. Plastaras, C. Leuratti, R. Singh, B. Gallacher-Horley, E. Offord, L. J. Marnett, W. P. Steward, and S. M. Plummer Cyclooxygenase-2, malondialdehyde and pyrimidopurinone adducts of deoxyguanosine in human colon cells Carcinogenesis, September 1, 2001; 22(9): 1557 - 1560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||