
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Advances in Brief |
Adult Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 [L. N. H.]; Department of Medicine [L. Y., V. L., S. P.], Comprehensive Cancer Center [O. M. C.], and Department of Biochemistry [T. S. H.], Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710; and Department of Surgery, Brigham & Womens Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 [J. D. I.]
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
protein and activity, suggesting that this is the mechanism of change in doxorubicin response. In addition, a 10100-fold (12 log) decrease in the LD50 of doxorubicin is seen after ErbB2 activation using the chimeric receptor model. Furthermore, we see a 100-fold decrease in the LD50 of etoposide, another topo II inhibitor. This increase in doxorubicin sensitivity is associated with a 4.5-fold increase in the amount of topo II
protein and an increase in topo II activity as measured by DNA decatenating and unknotting activities, as well as cleavable complex formation. In contradistinction to doxorubicin, we have observed an increased resistance to cyclophosphamide chemotherapy after chimeric receptor activation. We propose that the differential benefit seen with doxorubicin- versus alkylator-based chemotherapy in ErbB2+ breast cancer is due, in some cases, to ErbB2-mediated topo II
activation. These data also suggest hypotheses for the optimal sequencing of Herceptin and chemotherapy agents in ErbB2+ breast cancer. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The ErbB2 or HER-2 oncogene is overexpressed in approximately 30% of human breast cancer specimens and is associated with a poor outcome in many studies (3, 4, 5) . Recent data suggest that ErbB2 amplification and overexpression are associated with improved outcome after doxorubicin-based therapy as compared with alkylator-based therapy [CMF and PF (6 , 7) ]. This has led to the speculation that ErbB2 confers sensitivity to doxorubicin and resistance to alkylating agents.
In an attempt to understand the mechanism of the differential response to these regimens, we have studied the effect of activating the ErbB2 receptor on downstream enzymes that may affect drug response. Our previously published in vitro data have shown that activation of the ErbB2, ErbB3, and ErbB4 receptors using heregulin ß-2 is associated with an increase in the DNA-modifying enzyme, topo II
, which is accompanied by increased sensitivity to doxorubicin but resistance to an alkylator, cisplatin (8)
. In the current study, we have attempted to dissect the role of ErbB2 in modulating drug response using two ErbB2-dependent in vitro models. Data presented here demonstrate that an increase in topo II activity and greater sensitivity to doxorubicin follow ErbB2 receptor signaling. We have also observed an increased resistance to cyclophosphamide after ErbB2 receptor activation and propose that these two observations are linked by changes in topo II activity. Finally, we find that sensitivity to doxorubicin is reversed by Herceptin in ErbB2+ breast cancer cells. Whereas the role of Herceptin in early stage breast cancer has yet to be determined, our study suggests that combining this drug with doxorubicin is unlikely to be the optimal strategy against ErbB2+ tumors.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
protein levels, nuclear extracts were prepared from either chimeric cells or breast cancer cell lines. Chimeric cells were serum starved for 24 h followed by incubation with or without EGF (10 ng/ml) for 24, 48, 72, and 96 h. Breast cancer cell lines were treated with the mouse monoclonal anti-ErbB2 antibody 4D5 (Genentech, Alameda, CA) at 10 µg/ml, which is the target plasma level in human studies (11)
. Nuclear extracts were prepared by lysis of cells with a high-salt buffer [100 mM NaCl, 20 mM KCl, 20 mM Tris, and 0.5 mM Na2HPO4 (pH 7.4)] containing 0.5% Triton X-100 and 1% NP40. Nuclei were pelleted, and the nuclear proteins were solubilized by sonication in 1% SDS. After quantitation, 50 µg of nuclear protein were loaded and separated by 420% SDS-PAGE, transferred onto nitrocellulose, and incubated with an antihuman topo II
rabbit polyclonal antibody (TopoGEN, Inc., Columbus, OH). After secondary antibody incubation, the p170 kDa protein was visualized using ECL (Amersham, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom).
Cell Cycle Experiments.
ErbB2-amplified (SKBR3) and ErbB2-nonamplified, ER+ (MCF-7) cells were arrested in G1 using 2 mM hydroxyurea for 24 h, followed by release into serum-containing media. Cells were harvested at 0, 5, 11 and 24 h; nuclear extracts were prepared; and Western blotting for topo II
was performed as described above. FACS analysis was performed on an aliquot of cells from the same time points to determine their position in the cell cycle. SKBR3 cells were chosen for these experiments to facilitate comparison because their rate of progression through the cell cycle was similar to that of MCF-7 cells. Actin levels were measured as a loading control.
Cytotoxicity Assays.
Chimeric receptor cells were serum starved for 24 h and plated in 96-well microtiter plates at 1000 cells/well in quadruplicate in IMEM without phenol red containing 2% BCS and EGF (10 ng/ml). Cells were treated with continuous exposure to doxorubicin (0.00110 µM) or continuous exposure to VP-16 (0.001100 µM), approximating in vivo conditions for drug exposure. Cells treated with 4-HC were exposed to 4-HC (0.0011.0 µM) for 48 h, washed, and incubated in drug-free media for an additional 5 days. The short exposure period also approximates in vivo pharmacokinetics and avoids aerosolization of 4-HC that may contaminate control wells. On day 7, at confluence of the control samples, the cell viability was assessed by 2,3-bis[2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl]-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide inner salt (tetrazolium/formazan) assay (12)
. Results are expressed as a percentage of the control, where cells not treated with chemotherapy represent control values. The LD50 is the amount of drug required to kill 50% of cells. Experiments were repeated a minimum of three times for each drug evaluated.
Topo II Unknotting and Decatenation Assays.
For the unknotting assay, P4-bacteriophage circular DNA was incubated with increasing dilutions of nuclear extract in a reaction buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 100 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.5 mM EDTA, 30 µg/ml BSA, and 1 mM ATP (13)
. After a 30-min incubation at 30°C, reactions were terminated by SDS-Ficoll stop solution (5:1), and samples were separated by electrophoresis in 0.7% agarose. The fraction of unknotted products in the reaction was determined by densitometry and expressed as a function of the amount of nuclear protein added. All experiments were performed in triplicate.
The decatenation assay uses kinetoplast DNA to measure intermolecular strand passage activity (14) . Nuclear extracts prepared as noted above were incubated with kinetoplast DNA at 37°C for 15 min. After gel electrophoresis in 1% agarose, the fraction of decatenated products containing nicked circular or relaxed circular DNA was determined by densitometry and expressed as a function of the amount of nuclear protein loaded. All experiments were performed in triplicate.
Topo II Cleavage Assay.
Topo II cleavage assays were performed using the K-SDS assay to measure the formation of protein/DNA covalent complexes after exposure to topo II inhibitor (15)
. Briefly, cells were serum starved for 24 h, followed by treatment with or without EGF (10 ng/ml) for 24 h. After [3H]thymidine incorporation for 12 h, cells were treated with increasing concentrations of doxorubicin (0.110 µM) for a period of 12 h. Cells were washed and lysed with SDS and DNA-topo II protein complexes precipitated by the addition of KCl. The pellet was washed and resuspended in scintillation fluid, and the radioactivity of each sample was determined. Topo II cleavage activity was expressed by plotting the amount of protein-linked DNA versus drug concentration (µM doxorubicin). All experiments were performed in triplicate.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our second model allowed us to isolate the effect of ErbB2-mediated signaling without the presence of heterodimerizing coreceptors. Because ErbB2 has no known ligand, the receptor alone cannot be activated exogenously. Therefore we used an EGFR-ErbB2 chimeric receptor construct transfected into NIH-3T3 cells, which do not express significant levels of the EGFR superfamily members (Fig. 1
; Ref. 9
). Within 1 h of exposure to EGF (10 ng/ml), the ErbB2 receptor kinase is activated as demonstrated by phosphorylation of intracellular domain tyrosine residues and tritiated thymidine incorporation (data not shown).
Inhibition of ErbB2 Signaling Leads to Increased Resistance to Doxorubicin and Decreased topo II Activity in ErbB2+ Breast Cancer Cells.
We evaluated the effect of modulating ErbB2 signaling on doxorubicin response using 4D5 antibody (Herceptin). We assessed whether inhibition of the ErbB2 kinase was associated with a change in sensitivity to doxorubicin using a tetrazolium-based cytotoxicity assay. In these experiments, we found a reproducible inhibition of doxorubicin cytotoxicity after treatment with 4D5 (10 µg/ml) with an increase in the LD50 from 0.001 to 0.01 µM (Fig. 2)
.
|
|
protein. As reported previously, the 4D5 antibody led to a decrease in ErbB2 receptor tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig. 4A)
levels decreased during treatment with 4D5, concomitant with the decrease in ErbB2 receptor phosphorylation (Fig. 4B)
|
|
Topo II Activity and Protein Levels Are Increased in Chimeric Cells after ErbB2 Receptor Activation.
We again used the K-SDS assay to evaluate the intracellular topo activity in chimeric cells after activation of ErbB2. We observed a marked increase in DNA cleavage complexes in the chimeric cells after treatment with EGF as compared the same cells without EGF treatment (Fig. 6B)
. At a concentration of 1 µM doxorubicin, approximately six times more protein-linked DNA cleavage can be detected in the EGF-treated cells. At an even higher concentration, there is a decrease in the cleavage complex, a phenomenon common to the intercalative topo II inhibitors (17)
.
|
Using our EGFR-ErbB2 chimeric receptor model in a time course experiment, we observed that activation of ErbB2 is associated with an increase in topo II
protein from 48 to 72 h after receptor activation for both clones. This corresponds to a 4.5-fold increase in topo II
protein, based on band densitometry (Fig. 7A)
. Equal loading is seen for actin (Fig. 7B)
.
|
Is Seen throughout the Cell Cycle in ErbB2-overexpressing Cells but not in ER+ Cells that Do Not Overexpress ErbB2.
may be specific to the effects of this oncogene on downstream targets or may be a nonspecific effect of mitogenesis. To address this question, we performed cell cycle experiments on ErbB2-overexpressing (SKBR3) and non-ErbB2-overexpressing (MCF-7) breast cancer cells. MCF-7 cells are known to be dependent on estrogen receptor signaling for their growth. Both cell lines were blocked in early S-phase using hydroxyurea treatment and released into serum-containing media. A time course was performed to demonstrate topo II
activity at different phases of the cell cycle. The results show that ErbB2-overexpressing cells have higher levels of topo II
protein throughout different phases of the cell cycle compared with non-ErbB2-overexpressing MCF-7 cells (Fig. 8)
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and a change in sensitivity to chemotherapy agents used in breast cancer (8)
. In the current study, we have pursued the relationship between chemotherapy, ErbB2, and topo II. We have examined the effect of ErbB2 activation in cells that highly overexpress the receptor by activation of a chimeric receptor in heterologous cells and by inhibition of receptor signaling by the 4D5 monoclonal antibody. In each of these model systems, we were able to modulate the dose-response relationship to doxorubicin and observed consistent and concomitant changes in topo II
levels. Furthermore the topo II enzyme activity is also affected by changes in ErbB2 receptor activity.
Our data suggest a direct relationship between ErbB2 receptor signaling and topo II modulation. We have observed increases in both topo II
protein and enzymatic activity after receptor activation. These changes are accompanied by increase in sensitivity to the enzyme-specific inhibitors doxorubicin (Adriamycin) and VP-16. In addition, the anti-ErbB2 antibody, Herceptin, can reverse this effect. Furthermore, we see the opposite effect on response to cyclophosphamide, with increased resistance to the latter. We hypothesize that the increase in topo II activity observed after ErbB2 receptor signaling is responsible for the differential sensitivity of these cells to doxorubicin- versus alkylator-based therapy seen in the in vivo setting.
Topo II
is a DNA-modifying enzyme that can pass a segment of DNA duplex through a reversible, enzyme-mediated double-strand break (21)
. Drugs that target topo II include the anthracyclines (doxorubicin and daunorubicin), VP-16, teniposide, and amascarine (17)
. These agents appear to act by binding to the enzyme-DNA complex and inducing lethal cellular damage by the inhibition of the religation step during the transient DNA cleavage reaction. Increase in topo II
expression is associated with sensitivity to these agents in both cell lines and tumors, presumably due to increased target on which the drug may act (22
, 23)
.
A study evaluating 230 breast cancer tumor specimens demonstrated that increased expression of topo II
is associated with ErbB2 overexpression, even when adjusted for proliferative index (24)
. In a subset of 49 of these tumors, coamplification of topo II
and ErbB2 genes occurred as these genes colocalize to chromosome 17 (25)
. This study shows that topo II
may also increase by nongenetic mechanisms through temporary increases in ErbB2 receptor activation. We see increased topo II levels and activity in cell lines where ErbB2 is not amplified but is activated by a ligand. In addition, NIH-3T3 cells that contain a normal gene dosage of topo II
up-regulate this protein after activation of a chimeric receptor that has been transfected into these cells. Therefore, we conclude that increased levels of topo II
may be due either to gene amplification or to increased activity of the ErbB2 receptor. In addition, we have shown that topo II
levels appear to be higher in some ErbB2-amplified breast cancer cells, compared with transformed breast cancer cells that are not dependent on ErbB2 for growth. In this setting, both ErbB2 and topo II
activity can be down-regulated using the anti-ErbB2 antibody, Herceptin.
Large clinical trials suggest a benefit from doxorubicin in ErbB2+ breast cancer that is not as great as that with alkylator-based therapy. In the cooperative group study performed by the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP-B11), an improved outcome with a doxorubicin-containing regimen was seen only in patients whose tumors overexpressed ErbB2 (7)
. In another large study, Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 8869, patients whose tumors overexpressed ErbB2 had a better survival if they were treated with higher doses of doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy, in contrast to their ErbB2- counterparts (26)
. Furthermore, we have also shown that stage IV breast cancer patients who exhibit higher levels of circulating ErbB2-extracellular domain, are 6 times more likely to respond to doxorubicin-containing therapy than to CMF regimens (27)
. These clinical studies suggest that response to doxorubicin is influenced by ErbB2. In vitro studies presented in the current report corroborate clinical studies and suggest that topo II
is involved in the mechanism behind response to chemotherapy in ErbB2+ cells.
The relationship between ErbB2 overexpression in human breast cancer and poor outcome after CMF treatment suggests resistance to alkylating agents (20 , 21) . Although other agents (methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) are part of this regimen, it is generally accepted that cyclophosphamide is the most effective agent in this combination. In two separate studies, patients whose breast tumors overexpressed ErbB2 did not appear to achieve as much benefit from postoperative CMF chemotherapy as did their non-ErbB2-overexpressing counterparts. Thus, our in vitro observations are consistent with the clinical picture, where overexpression of ErbB2 is associated with relative resistance to cyclophosphamide.
Previous studies have demonstrated that resistance to alkylators such as cyclophosphamide is multifactorial (28
, 29)
. The most commonly described mechanisms are alterations in drug transport, modulation of glutathione levels, and enhanced repair of DNA adducts. It has been observed that some cell lines selected for resistance to alkylators have elevated levels of topo II
, and it has been suggested that topo II is involved in DNA repair through its modulation of chromatin structure (30
, 31)
. Although cause and effect have not been proven, similar resistance to 4-HC was associated with increased topo II activity in the in vitro system used for our studies. It has been shown that inhibition of ErbB2 can reduce the rate of unscheduled DNA repair, increase intrastrand adduct formation, and delay the rate of adduct decay in ErbB2+ cell lines (32
, 33)
. We speculate that topo II activity may be, in part, responsible for this modulation of repair activity. It is possible that other replication and repair-associated proteins are involved in a response to ErbB2 signaling and that components of this response confer sensitivity to topo II inhibitors, whereas other components confer resistance to alkylators. Topo II may be a member of this multifactorial response, perhaps as part of a multienzyme complex important in repair of DNA damage.
Our experiments demonstrate that ErbB2 signaling leads to alterations in both the level and enzymatic activity of topo II. This, in turn, is associated with increased sensitivity to doxorubicin and resistance to cyclophosphamide. Although a direct connection has not been proven, we suggest that alteration in topo II activity, brought on by ErbB2 receptor signaling, may be one mechanism by which differential sensitivity of ErbB2+ tumors to doxorubicin- versus cyclophosphamide-based regimens occurs in the clinical setting.
Recent development of the humanized monoclonal antibody, Herceptin, has provided useful therapy for HER-2+ patients, particularly in combination with chemotherapy. However, many questions remain about the ideal way to give Herceptin, its duration of use, and how best to monitor patients on therapy. Our study further suggests that the ideal way to combine Herceptin with chemotherapy involves combinations with cyclophosphamide where inhibition of topo II may lead to reversal of drug resistance. This hypothesis is supported by observational data from other in vitro work (34) . Moreover, our experiments suggest that combinations of Herceptin with doxorubicin are not ideal because this does not allow us to take advantage of increased topo II activity in ErbB2+ cells. Further understanding of the relationship between a given molecular lesion and response to chemotherapy will help us recommend our treatments in a more patient-specific manner.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 L. N. H. was supported by United States Army Medical Research & Material Command Breast Cancer Research Program Grant DAMD-17-96-1-6133. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Room 1210, 44 Binney Street, Boston, MA 02115. Phone: (617) 632-4132; Fax: (617) 632-3709. ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: CMF, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil; EGF, epidermal growth factor; EGFR, EGF receptor; topo, topoisomerase; ECL, enhanced chemiluminescence; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell-sorting; BCS, bovine calf serum; VP-16, etoposide; 4-HC, 4-hydroperoxy-cyclophosphamide. ![]()
Received 4/12/00; revised 3/12/01; accepted 3/15/01.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and GTPase-activating protein does not correlate with erbB-2 mitogenic potency. Mol. Cell. Biol., 11: 2040-2048, 1991.
co-amplification with erbB-2 in human primary breast cancer and breast cancer cell lines: relationship to m-AMSA and mitoxantrone sensitivity. Oncogene, 8: 933-938, 1993.[Medline]
and topoisomerase II as an indicator of clinical response to Adriamycin. Anticancer Res., 11: 429-432, 1991.[Medline]
is associated with rapid cell proliferation, aneuploidy and c-erbB2 overexpression in breast cancer. Am. J. Pathol., 148: 2073-2082, 1996.[Abstract]
associate with ErbB-2 amplification and affect sensitivity to topoisomerase II inhibitor doxorubicin in breast cancer. Am. J. Pathol., 156: 839-847, 2000.
, DNA polymerase ß, and DNA topoisomerase II in a melphalan-resistant rhabdomosarcoma xenograft that is cross-resistant to nitrosoureas and toptecan. Cancer Res., 54: 3487-3493, 1994.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. E. Coldwell, S. M. Cutts, T. J. Ognibene, P. T. Henderson, and D. R. Phillips Detection of Adriamycin-DNA adducts by accelerator mass spectrometry at clinically relevant Adriamycin concentrations Nucleic Acids Res., September 1, 2008; 36(16): e100 - e100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. DiGiovanna, D. F. Stern, S. Edgerton, G. Broadwater, L. G. Dressler, D. R. Budman, I. C. Henderson, L. Norton, E. T. Liu, H. B. Muss, et al. Influence of Activation State of ErbB-2 (HER-2) on Response to Adjuvant Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, and Fluorouracil for Stage II, Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Study 8541 From the Cancer and Leukemia Group B J. Clin. Oncol., May 10, 2008; 26(14): 2364 - 2372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M.S. Bartlett, I. O. Ellis, M. Dowsett, E. A. Mallon, D. A. Cameron, S. Johnston, E. Hall, R. A'Hern, C. Peckitt, J. M. Bliss, et al. Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Status Correlates With Lymph Node Involvement in Patients With Estrogen Receptor (ER) Negative, but With Grade in Those With ER-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer Suitable for Cytotoxic Chemotherapy J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2007; 25(28): 4423 - 4430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Kopjar, I. Milas, V. Garaj-Vrhovac, and M. Gamulin Cytogenetic outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy in non-target cells of breast cancer patients Human and Experimental Toxicology, May 1, 2007; 26(5): 391 - 399. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Menendez, I. Mehmi, and R. Lupu Trastuzumab in Combination With Heregulin-Activated Her-2 (erbB-2) Triggers a Receptor-Enhanced Chemosensitivity Effect in the Absence of Her-2 Overexpression J. Clin. Oncol., August 10, 2006; 24(23): 3735 - 3746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Maqani, A. Belkhiri, C. Moskaluk, S. Knuutila, A. A. Dar, and W. El-Rifai Molecular Dissection of 17q12 Amplicon in Upper Gastrointestinal Adenocarcinomas Mol. Cancer Res., July 1, 2006; 4(7): 449 - 455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P J Barrett-Lee Growth factor signalling in clinical breast cancer and its impact on response to conventional therapies: a review of chemotherapy Endocr. Relat. Cancer, July 1, 2005; 12(Supplement_1): S125 - S133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. U. Buzdar, N. K. Ibrahim, D. Francis, D. J. Booser, E. S. Thomas, R. L. Theriault, L. Pusztai, M. C. Green, B. K. Arun, S. H. Giordano, et al. Significantly Higher Pathologic Complete Remission Rate After Neoadjuvant Therapy With Trastuzumab, Paclitaxel, and Epirubicin Chemotherapy: Results of a Randomized Trial in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Operable Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2005; 23(16): 3676 - 3685. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Ross, J. A. Fletcher, K. J. Bloom, G. P. Linette, J. Stec, W. F. Symmans, L. Pusztai, and G. N. Hortobagyi Targeted Therapy in Breast Cancer: The HER-2/neu Gene and Protein Mol. Cell. Proteomics, April 1, 2004; 3(4): 379 - 398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Masuda, M. Suzui, J. T. E. Lim, and I. B. Weinstein Epigallocatechin-3-gallate Inhibits Activation of HER-2/neu and Downstream Signaling Pathways in Human Head and Neck and Breast Carcinoma Cells Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2003; 9(9): 3486 - 3491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Ross, J. A. Fletcher, G. P. Linette, J. Stec, E. Clark, M. Ayers, W. F. Symmans, L. Pusztai, and K. J. Bloom The HER-2/neu Gene and Protein in Breast Cancer 2003: Biomarker and Target of Therapy Oncologist, August 1, 2003; 8(4): 307 - 325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Climent, J. A. Martinez-Climent, D. Blesa, M. J. Garcia-Barchino, R. Saez, D. Sanchez-Izquierdo, P. Azagra, A. Lluch, and J. Garcia-Conde Genomic Loss of 18p Predicts an Adverse Clinical Outcome in Patients with High-Risk Breast Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2002; 8(12): 3863 - 3869. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Varis, M. Wolf, O. Monni, M.-L. Vakkari, A. Kokkola, C. Moskaluk, H. Frierson Jr., S. M. Powell, S. Knuutila, A. Kallioniemi, et al. Targets of Gene Amplification and Overexpression at 17q in Gastric Cancer Cancer Res., May 1, 2002; 62(9): 2625 - 2629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Di Leo, D. Gancberg, D. Larsimont, M. Tanner, T. Jarvinen, G. Rouas, S. Dolci, J.-Y. Leroy, M. Paesmans, J. Isola, et al. HER-2 Amplification and Topoisomerase II{alpha} Gene Aberrations as Predictive Markers in Node-positive Breast Cancer Patients Randomly Treated Either with an Anthracycline-based Therapy or with Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and 5-Fluorouracil Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2002; 8(5): 1107 - 1116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||