Clinical Cancer Research AACR Conference on Cancer Prevention
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fleming, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Ratain, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fleming, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Ratain, M. J.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 8, 3718-3727, December 2002
© 2002 American Association for Cancer Research


Clinical Trials

A Phase I Trial of Escalating Doses of Trastuzumab Combined with Daily Subcutaneous Interleukin 2

Report of Cancer and Leukemia Group B 96611

Gini F. Fleming2, Neal J. Meropol, Gary L. Rosner, Donna R. Hollis, William E. Carson, III, Michael Caligiuri, Joanne Mortimer, Katherine Tkaczuk, Robin Parihar, Richard L. Schilsky and Mark J. Ratain

Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637 [G. F. F., R. L. S., M. J. R.]; Divisions of Medical Science and Population Science, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111 [N. J. M.]; Cancer and Leukemia Group B Statistical Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710 [G. L. R., D. R. H.]; The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio 43210 [W. E. C., M. C., R. P.]; Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110 [J. M.]; and University of Maryland Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland 21201 [K. T.]


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the toxicity of escalating doses of trastuzumab when combined with a fixed dose regimen of interleukin (IL)-2.

Experimental Design: Eligible patients had nonhematological malignancies for which standard therapy did not exist or was no longer effective and had tumors that overexpressed HER2. IL-2 was initially administered at a dose of 1.25 million IU/m2 (low dose) s.c. daily except for 3 days every 2 weeks, when it was given at a dose of 15 million IU/m2 (intermediate dose). These doses were reduced to 1.0 million and 12 million IU/m2 after the first 18 patients. Trastuzumab was administered i.v. just before the first intermediate IL-2 dose and was escalated in cohorts of six or more patients from 1 mg/kg every 2 weeks to 8 mg/kg weekly. In vitro cytotoxicity testing was performed with patient peripheral blood mononuclear cells and HER2-overexpressing cell lines.

Results: Forty-five patients were treated. Dose-related toxicity from trastuzumab was not observed. IL-2-related toxicities such as fever, chills, and fatigue were less common with the reduced doses of IL-2. There were two grade 3 and three grade 4 pulmonary reactions. Four major responses were observed, all in breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab doses of at least 4.0 mg/kg. Although IL-2 produced expansion of natural killer cell subsets, there was no correlation between in vitro cytotoxicity and clinical response.

Conclusions: A regimen of IL-2 combined with trastuzumab is feasible, and response numbers are encouraging. Further testing of this regimen is warranted if the pulmonary toxicity can be ameliorated.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Trastuzumab is a humanized anti-HER2 mAb3 that has been shown to produce response rates of 15–40% when used as a single agent in patients with metastatic HER2-overexpressing breast cancer (1, 2, 3) and to prolong survival when added to chemotherapy in the first-line therapy of such patients (4) . The mechanism by which trastuzumab acts is unknown and may include antibody blocking of receptor-ligand interactions or interference with receptor-receptor or postreceptor interactions. It is also possible that immunological mechanisms could play a role. Trastuzumab has been shown to be ineffective in mice deficient in activating Fc receptors (5) . Antibodies capable of binding to both tumor targets and PBMCs could help deliver effector cells to tumor sites as well as augment cytotoxicity through ADCC. Human PBMCs can mediate ADCC against HER2-overexpressing breast cancer cells in vitro in the presence of trastuzumab (6) . Purified NK cells were extremely effective at mediating ADCC in this system.

NK cells comprise approximately 15% of PBMCs and are the only lymphocytes that constitutively express functional IL-2 receptors (7) . Ten percent of NK cells constitutively express high-affinity IL-2 receptors in addition to intermediate-affinity IL-2 receptors (8) . Activation of the high-affinity receptor with picomolar concentrations of IL-2 provides a proliferative stimulus, without augmenting cytotoxicity. Binding to the intermediate-affinity receptor requires nanomolar concentrations of IL-2 and results in augmented effector cell cytotoxicity, with little effect on proliferation. These effects are time dependent, with prolonged stimulation producing more pronounced effects. NK cells expanded in vivo with low-dose IL-2 commonly express a low-affinity Fc-{gamma} receptor (CD16) and participate in ADCC (9 , 10) . Thus, we hypothesized that the NK cell population could be expanded with low-dose IL-2 and subsequently stimulated to lyse antibody-coated tumor cells after administration of intermediate-dose IL-2.

Meropol et al. (11) demonstrated that daily s.c. IL-2 administration to cancer patients at doses ranging from 0.4–1.75 million IU/m2 (yielding peak levels of 10–100 pM) resulted in 154–530% expansion of NK cell numbers above baseline. The maximum tolerated dose was 1.25 million IU/m2 daily. In an effort to stimulate the cytotoxic mechanism in this expanded cell population, they then added 10-fold higher doses of IL-2 as outpatient "pulses" s.c. for 3 days every 2 weeks in patients receiving daily low doses. This resulted in further expansion of NK cell numbers, and the maximum tolerated "intermediate-dose pulse" was 15 million IU/m2 (12) . Dose-limiting toxicities with both the low-dose IL-2 and the intermediate-dose pulsing were largely constitutional, with fever, chills, and fatigue predominating.

The current Phase I study was designed to combine the IL-2 regimen developed by Meropol et al. (12) with escalating doses of trastuzumab to develop a treatment program suitable for future Phase II testing. In vitro ADCC assays using patient PBMCs and HER2-overexpressing target cell lines were performed to see whether results of these assays correlated with response. The effects of IL-2 on the expansion of the NK cell compartment were also evaluated via flow cytometric analysis of patient PBMCs for CD56+ cells.


    PATIENTS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Patient Population
Patients with any nonhematological cancer that overexpressed HER2 and had either failed effective standard therapy or for which effective standard therapy did not exist were eligible. Initially, HER2 overexpression was defined as staining 2+ or 3+ using the 4D5 mAb, and eligibility testing was performed centrally by Laboratory Corporation of America (LabCorp, Research Triangle Park, NC). Toward the end of the trial, once the DAKO immunohistochemical assay had been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for use in selecting patients to receive trastuzumab, patients were eligible if they had a tumor that stained 2+ or 3+ using the DAKO reagents, regardless of where the testing was performed. Central staining with the 4D5 antibody was still required. Patients who actually received treatment on study had their tumors retrospectively evaluated for HER2gene amplification if a sufficient tumor specimen was available. This assay was performed by LabCorp using the Vysis FISH assay.

Other eligibility criteria included age >=18 years, measurable or evaluable disease, Cancer and Leukemia Group B performance status 0 or 1, life expectancy >= 3 months, and adequate end-organ function as defined by an absolute granulocyte count >= 1,500/µl, platelet count >= 100,000/µl, blood urea nitrogen <= 1.5 x ULN, creatinine <= 1.5 x ULN, bilirubin <= 1.5 x ULN, and serum glutamic oxalic acid transferase and alkaline phosphatase both <= 5 x ULN. Toward the end of the trial, the requirement for a LVEF of >=45% was added due to reports that trastuzumab can induce cardiomyopathy. Patients were excluded for known central nervous system metastases, pregnancy or nursing, underlying immunological disease such as HIV infection or autoimmune disorder, concomitant treatment with corticosteroids or other immunomodulators, psychiatric conditions that would interfere with informed consent or treatment compliance, and any other serious medical illness including active uncontrolled infection, uncontrolled or severe cardiac disease, and known seropositivity for viral hepatitis. At least 4 weeks were to have elapsed since major surgery, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy, and 6 weeks were to have elapsed since any treatment with nitrosoureas, melphalan, or mitomycin C. Initially, any prior therapy with IL-2 or trastuzumab was prohibited; toward the end of the trial, this restriction was removed to facilitate accrual. All patients signed written informed consent in accordance with federal and institutional guidelines. Consent was signed before having tumor samples centrally tested for HER2 overexpression.

Treatment Regimen and Dose Escalation
The treatment plan is shown schematically in Fig. 1Citation . Patients received low-dose IL-2 as a daily s.c. injection starting on day 1 of protocol therapy and continuing without planned interruption, except that low-dose IL-2 was not given on days of intermediate-dose IL-2 administration. On the first (21-day) cycle, trastuzumab was given on day 7 as a 90-min infusion, and intermediate-dose IL-2 was given as a daily s.c. injection on days 8, 9, and 10. This was to help distinguish any acute (occurring within hours of infusion) toxicities due to trastuzumab from those due to intermediate-dose IL-2. On all subsequent (14-day) cycles, trastuzumab was given as a 90-min infusion on the same day as and just before the first intermediate-dose IL-2 injection.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Treatment schema.

 
IL-2 was supplied by the Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis of the NCI as a lyophilized cake in vials containing 1.3 mg of protein (22 million IU) and was reconstituted with 1.2 ml of sterile water for injection, USP. For the low-dose injections, this was further diluted with D5W to a concentration of 3.66 million IU/ml. Patients were given no more than a 7-day supply of low-dose IL-2 at a time and were instructed to keep their prefilled syringes refrigerated and warm them to room temperature 15 min before injection. Injection sites were to be rotated between abdomen, upper arm, anterior thighs, and buttocks or posterior thighs. For the first cycle of intermediate-dose IL-2, all doses were to be administered in the outpatient setting by medical personnel with vital signs measured at baseline and every 2 h for 8 h of observation. Subsequent cycles required 8 h of monitoring on the first day and 4 h of monitoring on the subsequent 2 days. In the early part of the study, this monitoring was continued indefinitely. Toward the end of the study, the duration of monitoring was decreased for patients who tolerated the therapy well. Routine premedication with acetaminophen or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents was optional.

Trastuzumab was supplied by the Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis Division, NCI, either as a liquid formulation or as a lyophilized formulation. The liquid formulation was supplied in 10-ml vials designed to deliver 5 mg/ml and was formulated in sodium acetate, sodium chloride, polysorbate 20, and water for injection USP. These vials did not contain preservative and were suitable for single use only. The lyophilized preparation was a freeze-dried preparation at a nominal content of 400 mg/vial. The formulation included histidine, trehalose, and polysorbate 20. Each vial was reconstituted with 20 ml of bacteriostatic water for injection, USP (containing 1.1% benzyl alcohol). The reconstituted solution was designed for multiple use within 28 days after reconstitution. The appropriate trastuzumab dose was added to 250 ml of 0.9% sodium chloride injection, USP, and infused over 90 min.

The low dose of IL-2 was initially fixed at 1.25 million IU/m2, and the intermediate dose of IL-2 was 15 million IU/m2. Because of IL-2-related toxicity, this was reduced after the first 18 patients to a low dose of 1.0 million IU/m2 and an intermediate dose of 12 million IU/m2. Trastuzumab was escalated through five antibody dose levels, 1, 2, 4, and 8 mg/kg biweekly and 8 mg/kg weekly. The biweekly schedule was tested so that trastuzumab doses would coincide with the intermediate-dose IL-2 pulses. The weekly cohort was added because that was the usual dosing schedule for trastuzumab. Escalation beyond a dose of 8 mg/kg was not planned because this dose was believed to provide adequate receptor saturation (1 , 13) . On the weekly antibody schedule, intermediate-dose IL-2 pulses remained at every-other-week intervals.

At least six patients were to be enrolled at each dose level at which excessive toxicity was not observed. Eligible patients with centrally documented HER2 overexpression who had already signed consent were guaranteed enrollment without waiting for the next dose level, and dose levels could be expanded accordingly. An antibody dose level was felt to be tolerable if fewer than two of the first six patients experienced a dose-limiting toxicity that was determined to be related to either antibody alone or the combination of antibody with IL-2. Toxicities related to IL-2 alone might require treatment modification but did not limit antibody dose escalation. A total of 12–18 patients were to be entered on the highest tolerated biweekly dose to better characterize the toxicity profile.

Toxicity considered a priori to be dose-limiting included grade 3–4 nonhematological toxicity, grade 4 hematological toxicity, and intolerable (persistent for >=4 weeks) grade 2 constitutional toxicities, such as fever, chills, or fatigue that were believed to be related to low-dose IL-2. Protocol therapy was also to be stopped if LVEF declined by >=15 absolute percentage points or to a value <=40%.

Patient Monitoring
Baseline evaluation included a history, physical exam, tumor measurements, urinalysis, electrocardiogram, chest X-ray, complete blood count with platelet and differential count, and serum chemistries. In the latter part of the study, a multigated angiocardiogram or echocardiogram was also required to assess LVEF. Physical examination, toxicity assessment, blood count with platelet count, and serum chemistries were repeated on day 7 of cycle 1 and on day 1 of all subsequent cycles. LVEF was to be repeated every 2 months. Tumor measurements were repeated after the first four cycles and then every five (2-week) cycles.

The study was monitored by weekly conference calls attended by a representative from each participating center with a patient on active therapy, the study chair, and the study statistician, who jointly made decisions about toxicity attributions and management. Dose reductions were performed as follows. Low-dose IL-2 was held for grade 3–4 or intolerable grade 2 toxicity felt to be related to low-dose IL-2 and reinstituted at a 25% dose reduction after resolution of toxicity. If toxicity recurred after one dose reduction, the patient was removed from protocol therapy. Intermediate-dose IL-2 was held for grade 3–4 toxicity other than grade 3 fever or fatigue/malaise occurring within 24 h of an intermediate-dose pulse. It was reinstituted with a 25% dose reduction after resolution of toxicity. If toxicity recurred after one dose reduction, then the patient was removed from protocol therapy. Toxicities related to multiple components, such as low- and intermediate-dose IL-2 were managed by dose reductions of both components. Trastuzumab was held for grade 3–4 toxicity related to antibody and could be reinstituted with a 25% dose reduction. This dose reduction was not applied when toxicities were felt to be typical of a first-dose reaction that was not likely to recur. Patients were also removed from study treatment for PD or patient desire to discontinue protocol therapy.

Responses were recorded using the following criteria. CR required disappearance of all signs and symptoms of disease. PR was a >50% reduction in the sum of the products of the perpendicular diameters of all measured lesions. The category of PR did not apply to patients without measurable disease. PD was an increase in the sum of the products of the perpendicular diameters of all measured lesions by >25%, any new lesion, or (for evaluable disease) any definite increase in tumor size. SD was disease fitting none of the above criteria.

Correlative Studies
Blood for correlative studies was drawn at baseline, on day 1 of cycle 3 (immediately before antibody administration), and on day 4 of cycle 3 (24 h after the third intermediate-dose IL-2 administration). Blood was drawn in cycle 4 if cycle 3 samples could not be obtained. Additional samples were obtained from later cycles in some patients. Heparinized blood was sent at room temperature by overnight mail to a central laboratory for processing. PBMCs were viably procured from heparinized blood samples using Ficoll-Hypaque density centrifugation, cryopreserved per protocol, and stored in liquid nitrogen for later analysis (14) .

Flow Cytometry.
Frozen PBMCs were thawed (viability was routinely >90%), counted, and stained for cell surface expression of CD56 (NK cell marker) and CD16 (Fc{gamma}RIII) with phycoerythrin-labeled anti-CD56 mAb and FITC-labeled anti-CD16 mAb, respectively (BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA). After the addition of mAbs, samples were incubated in flow buffer (PBS + 5% fetal bovine serum) for 30 min at 4°C and washed twice with flow buffer before fixation in 1% formalin. Stained PBMCs were analyzed via two-color flow cytometry using a Coulter Elite XL Flow Cytometer. Ten thousand events were analyzed using standard lymphocyte gates (15) .

51Chromium Release ADCC Assay.
Patient PBMCs were viably thawed, enumerated, and plated at a density of 1 x 105, 5 x 104, 2.5 x 104, and 1.25 x 104 cells/well in 96-well, V-bottomed plates in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% human AB serum and antibiotic/antimycotic solution (Life Technologies, Inc., Calsbad, CA) with or without 1 or 10 ng/ml recombinant human IL-2 and incubated for 18 h at 37°C. SKBR3 (human HER2-positive breast adenocarcinoma) and MDA-468 (human HER2-negative adenocarcinoma) cells were washed and labeled with either Herceptin or control human IgG antibody for 30 min on ice, washed again, and then labeled with 100 µCi 51Cr/million cells. 51Cr-labeled SKBR3 or MDA-468 tumor targets were washed three times and then added (4 x 103 cells/well) for effector (patient PBMC) to target (E:T) ratios of 100:1, 50:1, 25:1, and 10:1, respectively (8) . Plates were incubated at 37°C for 4 h, at which time cells were pelleted by centrifugation, and the supernatant was harvested for quantification of chromium release. Minimum and maximum release were determined via the incubation of labeled target cells in culture media alone or media supplemented with 1% NP40 detergent, respectively. Percentage of lysis was determined by the formula below.

Results are presented as mean specific lysis of triplicate wells (difference between percentage of lysis of Herceptin-coated targets and percentage of lysis of control IgG-treated targets).

Differences in the number of NK cells and percentage of specific lysis over time were tested using a Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test and between responders and nonresponders using a Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA (16) .


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
HER2 Screening.
This study was activated on April 15, 1997 and closed to accrual March 21, 2000. Three hundred and fifty-four patients were centrally screened for HER2 overexpression, and 64 of these (18%) had 2+ or 3+ staining using the 4D5 mAb. Forty-five patients received therapy on this trial; the remainder withdrew or progressed before receiving study treatment. The majority of the patients entered the study during its early years; accrual was slower after the commercial availability of trastuzumab. Breakdown of percentage of HER2 positivity by tumor type screened is shown in Table 1Citation . The percentage of patients found to overexpress HER2 would be expected to be greater than the percentage in the population at large, particularly for breast cancer, because many tumors were known to have HER2 overexpression by local assay before samples were submitted for central screening. The majority of patients entering the treatment phase of the trial had tumors strongly (3+) overexpressing HER2 (Table 2)Citation . Four patients treated had tumors that stained 2+ or 3+ using DAKO reagents but stained 0 or 1+ by the central 4D5 assay; one patient never had tumor sent for central assay. Thirty of the patients treated on the study also had their tumors assayed by FISH (for 3 patients, FISH was technically unsuccessful, and for 11 patients, there were no additional slides available). Results are shown in Table 3Citation . All specimens that stained 3+ using the central 4D5 assay showed gene amplification. One tumor that was scored 0 on the centrally performed 4D5 assay but 3+ on a local assay using DAKO reagents did show gene amplification by FISH. Other characteristics of patients treated on the study are shown in Table 4Citation .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Results of Her-2 screening (4D5 assay)

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2 Her-2 status of patients treated on study (4D5 assay)

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3 Concordance between FISH and immunohistochemistry (IHC)

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4 Patient characteristics

 
Toxicity.
There were five trastuzumab dose levels, as shown in Table 5Citation . There was no evidence of increasing toxicity related to increasing trastuzumab dose. However, at the starting IL-2 doses (a low dose of 1.25 million IU/m2 and an intermediate dose of IL-2 of 15 million IU/m2), 12 of 18 patients (67%) were either removed from study therapy for IL-2-related toxicities or required dose reductions of the low- and/or intermediate-dose IL-2. Gastrointestinal, constitutional, and hematological toxicities predominated. IL-2 doses were therefore reduced to a low dose of 1.0 million IU/m2 and an intermediate dose of 12 million IU/m2. Eight of the subsequent 27 patients (30%) required dose reductions or were removed from study therapy because of IL-2-related toxicities. Constitutional toxicity such as fatigue and malaise became markedly less common; 6 of the final 26 patients noted grade 2 or higher fatigue or malaise. Tables 6Citation , 7Citation , and 8Citation show selected grade 2 and higher toxicities in the cohorts of patients receiving the initial and reduced doses of IL-2. Institutions were instructed to code toxicity as related to either intermediate-dose IL-2 or low-dose IL-2 (not both) or to trastuzumab alone or trastuzumab in combination with IL-2. In practice, it was difficult to separate out the attribution of many IL-2-related toxicities.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5 Treatment-limiting toxicities by dose level

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6 Toxicities attributed to low-dose IL-2 alone

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 7 Toxicities attributed to intermediate-dose IL-2 alone

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 8 Toxicities for antibody alone or in combination with any IL-2

 
Low-dose IL-2 caused primarily intolerable grade 2 fatigue and malaise, but hematological toxicities were also seen. One patient developed a pruritic erythematous rash with low-dose IL-2. This began on day 3 of low-dose IL-2 therapy and spread to involve the legs, arms, face, chest, and back. IL-2 was discontinued after day 4, and the rash gradually resolved with diphenhydramine therapy. The patient chose to withdraw from treatment rather than be rechallenged.

Intermediate-dose IL-2 frequently resulted in nausea, vomiting, and fevers (see Table 7Citation ). Injection site reactions with intermediate-dose IL-2 also occurred frequently and were managed with local measures and by dividing the dose into two separate injections. There were five pulmonary toxicities of grade 3 or higher noted on this study, and three of these were attributed primarily to intermediate-dose IL2. One patient at the 2 mg/kg trastuzumab dose level with breast cancer metastatic to the lungs tolerated her first dose of trastuzumab but became progressively more hypoxic starting hours after her first intermediate dose of IL-2 and was admitted to the hospital. She gradually improved and was rechallenged in cycle 2 with a 25% reduction in the dose of intermediate-dose IL-2. She again became hypoxic and was removed from study therapy. The second patient was on the 8 mg/kg trastuzumab dose level and had lung cancer. She also tolerated her first dose of antibody, but after the first injection of intermediate-dose IL-2, she gradually became severely dyspneic and was admitted to the hospital the following day. She recovered over several days, but she was not rechallenged. A third woman with breast cancer and extensive lung metastases developed dyspnea and an acute respiratory distress syndrome-like syndrome after her second trastuzumab dose in association with an infection related to her indwelling catheter. The other two pulmonary reactions were temporally related to the initial trastuzumab infusion and are described below. Of the seven grade 2 or higher pulmonary toxicities that were felt to be treatment related, six occurred among the 21 patients known to have lung involvement by tumor (P = 0.042, Fisher’s exact test).

Trastuzumab or the combination of trastuzumab with IL-2 was felt to be primarily responsible for one episode of severe pulmonary toxicity. A patient with breast cancer and mediastinal node involvement developed severe neck pain progressing down to her chest about 4 h after her first 4 mg/kg trastuzumab infusion. The following day, a chest X-ray showed development of subsegmental atelectasis, and a computed tomography scan showed an increase in the size of her adenopathy, which was compressing her airway. She was treated with antibiotics and steroids and fully recovered. She was removed from protocol therapy and treated uneventfully with single-agent trastuzumab. There were also several trastuzumab first-dose infusion-related reactions with pulmonary components. These could be dramatic, but they were not treated with dose reductions. For example, one woman with breast cancer metastatic to liver, bronchus, and pleura developed flushing, tachycardia, and a decrease in oxygen saturation 7 min into her first trastuzumab infusion. She recovered, was rechallenged the next day, and continued on protocol for 18 cycles.

There was no cardiac toxicity reported on this study, and no patient died of toxicity.

Responses.
Four major responses were noted, two CRs (lasting 4 months and 33 months) and two PRs. All responses were in breast cancer patients treated at trastuzumab doses of >=4 mg/kg every other week (Table 9)Citation . Of the 18 breast cancer patients treated at doses of >=4 mg/kg, 4D5 immunostaining results were as follows: fourteen 3+; two 2+; one 1+; and one 0. One patient with evaluable inflammatory skin disease had tumor regression short of a CR and was coded as SD. Six breast cancer patients treated at dose levels of >=4 mg/kg had SD, and four were NE because they were removed from study early for toxicity. Four had PD. One of those with PD had prior trastuzumab therapy, and one stained 0 on the central 4D5 immunoassay. Of the three breast cancer patients entered who had prior trastuzumab therapy, one had PD, and two were NE for response. Overall, at a dose of >=4 mg/kg, breast cancer patients had a 22% (4 of 18) response rate.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 9 Responses in patients with breast cancer

 
Correlative Assays.
Baseline and some postbaseline samples were submitted for 36 patients. A subset of 15 patients, most of whom enrolled in the early part of the trial, was selected for ADCC assays. These patients had sufficient viable cells obtained both at baseline before receiving IL-2 and in either cycle 3 or cycle 4 of IL-2 therapy. This subset included four of the five responders, six patients with SD, four patients who progressed, and one patient NE for disease. An additional subset of nine of these patients (including the four responders) plus another SD patient (N = 10) had PBMCs analyzed for expression of NK surface antigens.

The results for the 10 patients analyzed for NK cell surface antigens revealed a consistent and significant (P = 0.02) increase in percentage of CD56+ NK cells over the course of low-dose IL-2 therapy from baseline (mean = 16.9%) to cycle 3 day 1 (mean = 36.0%; Fig. 2ACitation ). The CD56bright/CD16- subset of NK cells, which normally comprises approximately 1% of PBMCs, increased in response to therapy (see Fig. 2BCitation for one example). This subset comprised 25.7% (standard deviation, 18%) of NK cells posttherapy and decreased in only one patient. In addition, the CD56+/CD16+ population, capable of recognizing antibody-coated targets, increased from baseline (mean = 14.9%) to cycle 3 day 1 (mean = 28.7%; P = 0.008). However, when clinical response of individual patients was evaluated in relation to NK cell expansion, there was no significant difference in the absolute magnitude of NK cell expansion between responders and nonresponders.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. The CD56bright NK cell compartment is expanded after low-dose IL-2 therapy. Patient PBMCs were analyzed for the percentage of NK cells at baseline and after day 4 of cycle 3 or cycle 4 of therapy by flow cytometric analysis. A, NK cell expansion from baseline to post-IL-2 therapy (N = 10). Error bars, SE. B, PBMC analysis of a patient with dramatically increased NK cell numbers is shown as CD56 surface expression (Y axis) versus CD16 surface expression (X axis). This patient exhibited a typical expansion of the CD56bright subset of NK cells after 10 cycles of therapy (highlighted).

 
To determine the effects of NK cell expansion on ADCC activity mediated by patient PBMCs over the course of therapy, the ADCC assays for 15 patients were analyzed. The results are summarized in Fig. 3ACitation . Specific lysis of targets by effector cells without IL-2 activation was, on average, 15% in this assay, regardless of cycle. However, PBMCs obtained during cycle 3 of therapy (two patients with PBMCs from cycle 4 included) mediated an average of 45% and 54% (days 1 and 4 of the cycle, respectively) specific lysis of trastuzumab-coated targets when stimulated in vitro with IL-2, as compared with 42% specific lysis for cells obtained pretherapy. When ADCC results of individual patients were analyzed with respect to objective clinical response, it was determined that changes in ADCC during the course of therapy by patient PBMCs did not correlate with clinical response. Fig. 3BCitation shows the individual patterns of ADCC activity of patient PBMCs in response to IL-2 therapy by clinical outcome.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Trastuzumab-mediated ADCC in the presence of IL-2. Patient PBMCs were stimulated with 10 ng/ml recombinant human IL-2 overnight and then analyzed for their ability to conduct ADCC against the HER2-positive cell line, SKBR3, in the presence of trastuzumab via a standard 4-h 51Cr release cytotoxicity assay. Shown are the percentage of specific lysis levels from baseline (prestudy) to day 1 and day 4 of cycle 3 (cycle 4 data were used for two patients) mediated by patient PBMCs. A, results given represent an average level taken from 15 patients. Error bars, SE. B, representative patients, arbitrarily labeled as A–N, are arranged within subgroups as follows: CR, patients with CR; PR, patients with PR; SD, patients with SD; and PD, patients with PD. All patients shown had breast cancer except patients H (ovarian cancer) and M (gastric cancer). Trastuzumab-mediated lysis against a HER2-negative cell line (MDA-468) was routinely <5% in all assays (data not shown). Breaks in the X axis indicate gaps in linear time.

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The recommended Phase II doses of trastuzumab and IL-2 on this regimen are a low dose of IL-2 of 1.0 million IU/m2, an intermediate dose of 12 million IU/m2, and a trastuzumab dose of 4 mg/kg every other week. Higher trastuzumab doses did not produce any greater toxicity; however, neither did they appear any more active. Dose escalation beyond a dose of 8 mg/kg on a weekly schedule was not planned. The weekly schedule was incorporated into this trial because it was the schedule that had been tested in earlier studies (1, 2, 3) . However, more recent data (17) describing the long half-life of trastuzumab (3–4 weeks) support the use of the 4 mg/kg every other week dose level for further testing because this provides the same total trastuzumab dose as the widely tested 2 mg/kg/week dose schedule and would be expected to maintain adequate trough levels.

The toxicities on this regimen were manageable after dose reduction of the IL-2 component. It is not certain why we observed more toxicity with the initial doses of IL-2 than reported in the Phase I trial (12) . In particular, Meropol et al. (12) reported no hematological toxicity, whereas there were five instances of grade 3–4 platelet or neutrophil toxicity among our 18 patients treated at the same doses. However, it is likely that our patients were more heavily pretreated with agents that damage the bone marrow. Fourteen of the 19 patients in the initial report had colorectal cancer, which, at the time, was treated primarily with 5-fluorouracil-based therapy. Twenty-nine of our patients had three or more prior chemotherapy regimens, and 14 had high-dose chemotherapy with autologous marrow or stem cell rescue. The pulmonary toxicities were concerning, and patients with extensive pulmonary disease should only receive this regimen with extreme caution. We also noted a number of first infusion-related reactions. It is not possible to determine whether these are more common or more severe than those seen with single-agent trastuzumab; conceivably, the low-dose IL-2 may have primed the immune system and worsened the initial infusion-related reactions. One possible adjustment to the schedule would be to give a dose of trastuzumab before any IL-2, and this adjustment has been incorporated in an ongoing trial of this regimen in patients who have previously received trastuzumab.4 Another possibility for abrogating the toxicity of the regimen would be to give the low-dose IL-2 without the intermediate-dose pulses. Although the intermediate-dose pulses are theoretically important to augment effector cell cytotoxicity, the peak IL-2 levels observed by Meropol et al. (12) were only in the 150–200 pM range. Our lower-dose regimen may not have achieved even these levels. Nanomolar concentrations of IL-2 are required to saturate intermediate-affinity receptors, although lower concentrations might engage a significant number (7) . The contribution of the intermediate-dose pulses is therefore uncertain.

An increase in the percentage of NK cells was demonstrated in this study, but it was far less dramatic than the mean 800% increase observed by Meropol et al. (12) . This may partially reflect a more heavily pretreated group of patients. We have reported previously that low-dose IL-2 can expand a class of CD56+ effector cells that retain the ability to lyse antibody-coated target cells (18) . In this trial, there was no significant increase in ADCC activity in the assay used, possibly because the expansion of the NK cell compartment was smaller than that observed in previous trials (although there is a nonsignificant trend toward more lysis after the intermediate-dose IL-2 administration). Moreover, there is no correlation between clinical response and the lytic capacity of patient PBMCs as measured in our assay. This may be a limitation of the assay. It might also imply that other effector mechanisms, such as cytokine secretion, may be involved in the elimination of tumor cells. Indeed, we have demonstrated previously that immobilized IgG and IL-2 synergistically stimulate the production of IFN-{gamma} by NK cells in vitro (18) . Thus, cytokine secretion by IL-2-expanded NK cells should be examined in future clinical trials of trastuzumab with IL-2. Another cause for the lack of correlation between clinical response and ADCC is that this trial was not designed to evaluate response. Very few breast cancer patients treated at higher doses had frank progression, yielding low power for any correlation within breast cancer patients alone. Moreover, if only the higher doses of trastuzumab produce sufficient antigen saturation for adequate enhancement of immunological activity, then patients treated at the lower trastuzumab doses might not be expected to respond regardless of any increase in ADCC.

All major responses were observed in breast cancer patients at the higher doses of trastuzumab. The level of activity in breast cancer patients at doses of >=4 mg/kg (22%) might be compared with the response rate to single-agent trastuzumab. In a large Phase II study of single-agent trastuzumab in breast cancer patients with one or two prior chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease, the response rate among those patients staining 3+ by either 4D5 or CB11 was 18% (2) . None of the patients in that trial had prior trastuzumab, all had measurable disease, and toxicity did not require early withdrawal of therapy. In conclusion, it is impossible to meaningfully compare response rates from this trial with those in the literature. However, activity is at least maintained. We believe further development of this approach is warranted, particularly if some of the IL-2-related toxicities can be mitigated by schedule or dosage adjustments.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 10 Institutions that have participated in this study.

 

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The institutions shown in Table 10Citation participated in this study.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Research for Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9661 was supported in part by grants from the National Cancer Institute (CA31946 and CA 44691) to the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (Richard L. Schilsky, M. D., Chairman). Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at University of Chicago Medical Center, Section of Hematology/Oncology, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, MC 2115, Chicago, IL 60637. Phone: (773) 702-6712; Fax: (773) 702-0963; E-mail: gfleming{at}medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu Back

3 The abbreviations used are: mAb, monoclonal antibody; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cell; IL, interleukin; ADCC, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity; NK, natural killer; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; ULN, upper limits of institutional normal values; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NCI, National Cancer Institute; CR, complete response; PR, partial response; PD, progressive disease; SD, stable disease; NE, not evaluable; USP, United States Pharmacopoeia; DSW, dextrose 5% water. Back

4 C. Shapiro, personal communication. Back

Received 3/25/02; revised 7/29/02; accepted 8/ 8/02.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Baselga J., Tripathy D., Mendelsohn J., et al Phase II study of weekly intravenous recombinant humanized anti-p185HER2 monoclonal antibody in patients with HER2/neu-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol., 14: 737-744, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Cobleigh M. A., Vogel C. L., Tripathy D., et al Multinational study of the efficacy and safety of humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody in women who have HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer that has progressed after chemotherapy for metastatic disease. J. Clin. Oncol., 17: 2639-2648, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Vogel C. L., Cobleigh M. A., Tripathy D., et al Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab as a single agent in first-line treatment of HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol., 20: 719-726, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Slamon D. J., Leyland-Jones B., Shak S., et al Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N. Engl. J. Med., 344: 783-792, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Clynes R. A., Towers T. L., Presta L. G., et al Inhibitory Fc receptors modulate in vivo cytotoxicity against tumor targets. Nat. Med., 6: 443-446, 2000.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Hotaling T. E., Reitz B., Wolfgang-Kimball D., et al The humanized anti-HER2 antibody rhuMAb HER2 mediates antibody dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity via FcyR III. Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res., 37: 471 1996.
  7. Smith K. A. Lowest dose interleukin-2 immunotherapy. Blood, 81: 1414-1423, 1993.[Free Full Text]
  8. Caligiuri M. A., Zmuidzinas A., Manley T. J., et al Functional consequences of interleukin 2 receptor expression on resting human lymphocytes. Identification of a novel natural killer cell subset with high affinity receptors. J. Exp. Med., 171: 1509-1526, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Lindemann A., Brossart P., Hoffken K., et al Immunomodulatory effects of ultra-low-dose interleukin-2 in cancer patients: a Phase-IB study. Cancer Immunol. Immunother., 37: 307-315, 1993.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Caligiuri M. A., Murray C., Robertson M. J., et al Selective modulation of human natural killer cells in vivo after prolonged infusion of low dose recombinant interleukin 2. J. Clin. Investig., 91: 123-132, 1993.
  11. Meropol N. J., Porter M., Blumenson L. E., et al Daily subcutaneous injection of low-dose interleukin 2 expands natural killer cells in vivo without significant toxicity. Clin. Cancer Res., 2: 669-677, 1996.[Abstract]
  12. Meropol N. J., Barresi G. M., Fehniger T. A., et al Evaluation of natural killer cell expansion and activation in vivo with daily subcutaneous low-dose interleukin-2 plus periodic intermediate-dose pulsing. Cancer Immunol. Immunother., 46: 318-326, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Carter P., Presta L., Gorman C. M., et al Humanization of an anti-p185HER2 antibody for human cancer therapy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89: 4285-4289, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Kasid A., Director E. P., Rosenberg S. A. Induction of endogenous cytokine-mRNA in circulating peripheral blood mononuclear cells by IL-2 administration to cancer patients. J. Immunol., 143: 736-739, 1989.[Abstract]
  15. Platts K. E., Lawry J., Hancock B. W., et al Phenotypic and cell cycle analysis of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells activated with interleukin-2 and/or OKT3. Exp. Cell Res., 208: 154-160, 1993.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Kruskal W. H., Wallis W. A. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 47: 583-621, 1952.[CrossRef]
  17. Gelmon K., Arnold A., Verma J., et al Pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of trastuzumab (Herceptin) when administered every three weeks to women with metastatic breast cancer. Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol., 20: 69a 2001.
  18. Carson W. E., Parihar R., Lindemann M. J., et al Interleukin-2 enhances the natural killer cell response to Herceptin-coated Her2/neu-positive breast cancer cells. Eur. J. Immunol., 31: 3016-3025, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. Varchetta, N. Gibelli, B. Oliviero, E. Nardini, R. Gennari, G. Gatti, L. S. Silva, L. Villani, E. Tagliabue, S. Menard, et al.
Elements Related to Heterogeneity of Antibody-Dependent Cell Cytotoxicity in Patients Under Trastuzumab Therapy for Primary Operable Breast Cancer Overexpressing Her2
Cancer Res., December 15, 2007; 67(24): 11991 - 11999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
G. C. Cesana, F. Romano, G. Piacentini, M. Scotti, A. Brenna, G. Bovo, M. Vaghi, G. Aletti, R. Caprotti, H. Kaufman, et al.
Low-dose Interleukin-2 Administered Pre-operatively to Patients with Gastric Cancer Activates Peripheral and Peritumoral Lymphocytes But Does Not Affect Prognosis
Ann. Surg. Oncol., April 1, 2007; 14(4): 1295 - 1304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. Gennari, S. Menard, F. Fagnoni, L. Ponchio, M. Scelsi, E. Tagliabue, F. Castiglioni, L. Villani, C. Magalotti, N. Gibelli, et al.
Pilot Study of the Mechanism of Action of Preoperative Trastuzumab in Patients with Primary Operable Breast Tumors Overexpressing HER2
Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2004; 10(17): 5650 - 5655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. Parihar, P. Nadella, A. Lewis, R. Jensen, C. De Hoff, J. E. Dierksheide, A. M. VanBuskirk, C. M. Magro, D. C. Young, C. L. Shapiro, et al.
A Phase I Study of Interleukin 12 with Trastuzumab in Patients with Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2-Overexpressing Malignancies: Analysis of Sustained Interferon {gamma} Production in a Subset of Patients
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2004; 10(15): 5027 - 5037.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
T. Repka, E. G. Chiorean, J. Gay, K. E. Herwig, V. K. Kohl, D. Yee, and J. S. Miller
Trastuzumab and Interleukin-2 in HER2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Pilot Study
Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2003; 9(7): 2440 - 2446.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fleming, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Ratain, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fleming, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Ratain, M. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online