Clinical Cancer Research Meeting Calendar Advances in Breast Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rassidakis, G. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Sarris, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rassidakis, G. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Sarris, A. H.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 8, 488-493, February 2002
© 2002 American Association for Cancer Research


Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates

BAX Expression in Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg Cells of Hodgkin’s Disease

Correlation with Clinical Outcome1

George Z. Rassidakis2, L. Jeffrey Medeiros, Timothy J. McDonnell, Simonetta Viviani, Valeria Bonfante, Gianpaolo Nadali, Theodoros P. Vassilakopoulos, Roberto Giardini, Marco Chilosi, Christos Kittas, Alessandro M. Gianni, Gianni Bonadonna, Giovanni Pizzolo, Gerassimos A. Pangalis, Fernando Cabanillas and Andreas H. Sarris

Departments of Lymphoma-Myeloma [G. Z. R., F. C., A. H. S.], Hematopathology [G. Z. R., L. J. M.], and Molecular Pathology [T. J. M.], University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030; Departments of Medical Oncology [S. V., V. B., A. M. G., G. B.] and Pathology [R. G.], Istituto Nazionale Tumori 20133, Milan, Italy; Departments of Hematology [G. N., G. P.] and Pathology [M. C.], University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy; and First Department of Internal Medicine [T. P. V., G. A. P.] and Laboratory of Histology and Embryology [C. K.], National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 11510, Greece


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Purpose: BAX, a proapoptotic member of the BCL-2 family of proteins, has been detected in Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells of Hodgkin’s disease (HD), but its clinical significance is unknown. Therefore, we correlated BAX expression with presenting features and clinical outcome in untreated patients with HD.

Design: Patients with biopsy-proven HD were eligible if they were untreated previously and if pretreatment paraffin-embedded tumor tissue was available. BAX was detected by immunohistochemistry without knowledge of clinical features or outcome. A tumor was considered as positive if any number of HRS cells expressed BAX, but other cutoffs of BAX expression were examined for analysis of clinical outcome.

Results: We identified 260 patients with HD. The median age was 31 years, and 55% were male. HRS cells expressed BAX in 181 of 195 (93%) nodular sclerosis, 47 of 48 (98%) mixed cellularity, 1 case of lymphocyte depletion, all 6 unclassified classical HD, and all 10 lymphocyte predominance tumors. Using a cutoff of 50% positive HRS cells for BAX expression, the 5-year failure-free survival (FFS) for patients with high versus low BAX expression was 83 versus 93%, respectively (P = 0.19 by Log-rank) for 116 patients treated with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine or equivalent regimens; it was 78 versus 79%, respectively, for 79 patients treated with mitoxantrone, vincristine, vinblastine, and prednisone and radiotherapy (P = 0.45 by Log-rank); it was 71 versus 81%, respectively, for 26 patients treated with nitrogen mustard, vincristine, prednisone, and procarbazine (P = 0.6 by Log-rank); and it was 72 versus 82% for 29 patients treated only with radiotherapy (P = 0.57 by Log-rank). The 5-year FFS was not statistically different when we used cutoffs of 20, 30, and 75% for BAX expression.

Conclusion: BAX is often expressed by HRS cells in HD and does not correlate with FFS.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Although the cure rate for HD3 is high, up to 30% of patients relapse and eventually die of disease or treatment complications (1, 2, 3) . Various clinical and laboratory features have been used to predict FFS and overall survival and to identify groups of patients with inferior prognosis. These include age; gender; peripheral or mediastinal bulk; stage IV; involvement of bone marrow or inguinal lymph nodes; anemia, leukocyte, and lymphocyte counts; and serum levels of albumin, LDH, ß2-microglobulin (4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11) , and interleukin-10 (12, 13, 14, 15) . However, additional prognostic factors related to the biology of HD are currently under investigation to improve prediction of clinical outcome and provide a rational basis for investigational therapy.

Immunological and molecular studies have shown that most HRS cells of classical HD are derived from germinal center B cells with rearranged immunoglobulin genes bearing crippling mutations (16, 17, 18, 19) . These mutations cause apoptosis in normal B-lymphocytes. Alterations of apoptotic pathways are involved in oncogenetic mechanisms in human cancers (20) . The role of BCL-2 family proteins in apoptosis is well established (21 , 22) . More than 20 proteins have been described that share homology with BH domains of the bcl-2 gene, with either antiapoptotic or proapoptotic function.

BAX is a Mr 21,000 protein with significant homology clustered in the BH1 and BH2 regions of the bcl-2 gene and was the first of the BCL-2 homologues characterized as an important cell death agonist (23) . BAX induces apoptotic cell death by its insertion into the mitochondrial membrane, binding to and thus inhibiting BCL-2 function and causing release of cytochrome c (24) . However, alternative hypotheses have been proposed (24) . The balance between BCL-2 and BAX is important for the induction of programmed cell death; when BCL-2 predominates, apoptosis is inhibited, whereas when the levels of BAX are increased, the cell initiates the apoptotic machinery (21) .

Previous studies have shown that many members of the BCL-2 family are expressed in HRS cells of HD, including BAX (25, 26, 27, 28, 29) , and >90% of HD tumors have been reported to be BAX positive (25) . However, because the number of HD tumors studied was small and selection criteria and treatment were not specified, the clinical significance of BAX expression remains unknown.

Therefore, we decided to investigate the expression of BAX in previously untreated patients with HD and determine its association with presenting clinical and laboratory features and with clinical outcome. To minimize the effect of heterogeneous therapy, we determined the FFS of uniformly treated groups of patients.


    PATIENTS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Patients.
Patients were eligible if they had presented from 1984 to 1996 without any prior treatment at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX), Istituto Tumori Nazionale (Milan, Italy), University of Verona (Verona, Italy), and the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (Athens, Greece). It was required that the pathological diagnosis be initially established on the basis of tissue biopsy, pretreatment tumor be available for immunohistochemical determination of BAX expression; and the histological diagnosis be confirmed when slides were reviewed at the time of immunohistochemical analysis, according to criteria defined by the WHO classifications (30) . Patients with HIV-1 infection were ineligible.

Staging.
All patients had physical examination, chest radiograph, bone marrow biopsy, and computerized tomography of chest, abdomen, and pelvis. When clinically indicated, lymphangiogram, gallium scan, and computerized tomography of the head and neck were also obtained according to the individual practices of the participating institutions. The ratio of mediastinal mass to thoracic diameter was measured at the T4-T5 interspace as described previously (4) and was considered high if >=0.45. The Ann Arbor stage (31) and treatment according to either standard or investigational protocols was determined by the attending physician at each institution. Serum LDH was considered high if the levels were >=150% of the upper normal limit as described previously (12) , and serum albumin was defined as low if <3.5 grams/dl (4) . Anemia was defined as hemoglobin < 12 grams/dl for females and <14 grams/dl for males (4) . Serum ß2-microglobulin measured by RIA (Pharmacia Diagnostics, Upsala, Sweden) was considered high when >2.5, the upper limit of normal at each institution.

Therapy.
Treatment was either standard or according to investigational protocols active during the time the patient was diagnosed at the participating institutions. Informed consents were obtained before all procedures and before investigational therapy, according to local practice guidelines.

Regimens included ABVD or E (epirubicin) with BVD (32 , 33) ; NOVP followed by radiotherapy (34) ; MOPP (1) ; MOPP alternating with ABVD (3) ; cyclophosphamide, vinblastine, prednisone, and procarbazine alternating with doxorubicin, bleomycin, dacarbazine, prednisone, and carmustine (34) ; and vinblastine, etoposide, prednisone, epirubicin, and bleomycin (35) . Radiotherapy was administered alone or after completion of chemotherapy with various ports and dosages according to local standard or investigative protocols. For the purposes of this analysis, ABVD; EBVD; cyclophosphamide, vinblastine, prednisone, and procarbazine/doxorubicin, bleomycin, dacarbazine, prednisone, and carmustine; MOPP/ABVD; and vinblastine, etoposide, prednisone, epirubicin, and bleomycin were considered equivalent regimens (3 , 12) .

CR was defined as the absence of disease for at least 1 month as determined by physical examination and appropriate laboratory and imaging studies. PR was defined as >50% reduction of tumor mass measurable in two dimensions. Progressive disease was defined as enlargement (>25%) of a preexisting site of disease or development of disease in a previously uninvolved site. Primary treatment failure was defined as failure to achieve CR or PR during initial therapy. Relapse was defined as progression occurring at least 1 month after CR or PR.

Immunohistochemistry.
Immunohistochemical detection of BAX was achieved using heat-induced antigen retrieval and the monoclonal antibody 2D2 (Zymed, South San Francisco, CA) at a dilution of 1:40 as described previously (36) . BAX-positive normal prostate tissue was used as an external positive control in each experiment (37) . In addition, coexisting small reactive lymphocytes served as internal positive and negative controls in each HD slide.

Routinely stained slides were reviewed at the time of immunohistochemical analysis for confirmation of diagnosis of HD, according to criteria defined by the WHO classification (30) . In every case, HRS cells were shown to be positive for CD15 and/or CD30 in the same tissue blocks assessed for BAX. BAX immunostains were reviewed without knowledge of clinical features or outcome. Slides were considered evaluable if all concurrent internal and external controls stained appropriately. Any cytoplasmic BAX staining of the malignant HRS cells was considered positive. At least 100 HRS cells in representative fields were manually counted in each tumor to determine the percentage of BAX-positive HRS cells. For the purpose of the statistical analysis of clinical outcome and based on the distribution of BAX-positive HRS cells among tumors, we used a 50% cutoff to define high versus low expression of BAX. However, other cutoffs for BAX expression were also used for correlation with clinical outcome.

Statistical Analysis.
FFS was measured according to the method of Kaplan and Meier (38) , from the beginning of treatment to primary treatment failure, relapse, or last follow-up. Patients who died during treatment without evidence of progressive disease, or after the end of therapy without prior evidence of relapse, were censored. The statistical significance of differences in FFS between groups of patients was estimated by the Log-rank test (39) . The comparisons between BAX expression and clinical or laboratory parameters were based on {chi}2 and Fisher’s exact tests. Nonparametric Mann-Whitney test was used to evaluate the correlation between patient age and BAX expression. All statistical calculations were performed using StatView (Abacus Concepts, Inc., Berkeley, CA).


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Study Group.
We identified 1765 untreated patients with HD who presented to the participating institutions between 1984 and 1996. The present study group included 260 patients. Most presenting clinical and laboratory features of patients with known (260 patients) versus unknown (1505 patients) BAX expression are similar, as shown in Table 1Citation . Therefore, we consider the analyzed group to be representative of the whole patient population. For these 260 patients, HD was classified as NS in 195, mixed cellularity in 48, lymphocyte depletion in 1 patient, classical HD not otherwise specified in 6, and lymphocyte predominance HD in 10 patients (Table 1)Citation . Treatment was ABVD or an equivalent regimen in 116, NOVP followed by radiotherapy in 79, MOPP in 26, and only radiotherapy in 29 patients.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Presenting clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients with HD

 
BAX Expression.
BAX was expressed by any HRS cells in 245 of 260 (94%) tumors (Table 2)Citation and was detected in the cytoplasm of HRS cells but with variable staining intensity (Fig. 1)Citation . Reactive small lymphocytes, present in variable numbers in all cases, were also positive for BAX and served as internal positive controls (Fig. 1)Citation .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 BAX expression in HRS cells of HD according to histologic subtype

 


View larger version (141K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. BAX expression in classical HD. A, NS HD with a large number of HRS cells strongly expressing BAX. Inset: a typical Reed-Sternberg cell stains for BAX with a granular cytoplasmic pattern. B, NS HD with BAX-negative HRS cells. Inset: a typical Reed-Sternberg cell negative for BAX is shown. Small reactive lymphocytes stained positively for BAX and served as internal positive controls in all panels.

 
The percentage of HRS expressing BAX varied considerably between tumors, as shown in Fig. 2Citation . The mean percentage of BAX-positive HRS cells was 56 ± 29 but ranged from 0 to 97%. For the purpose of a first statistical analysis and based on the histogram of BAX-positive HRS cells (Fig. 2)Citation , we considered BAX expression to be high if >50% of HRS expressed BAX.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. Frequency of HRS cells expressing BAX among classical HD patients. Only positive tumors are shown.

 
BAX immunoreactivity in >50% of HRS cells was more frequent in females (P = 0.003, Fisher’s exact test) and patients younger than 45 years (P = 0.05, Fisher’s exact test) in this study but was not statistically associated with any other presenting clinical and laboratory features, including stage, B-symptoms, bone marrow involvement, bulky disease, or laboratory parameters.

FFS Analysis.
After a median follow-up of 85 months for the survivors, 16 of the 116 patients treated with ABVD or an equivalent regimen failed. Using a 50% cutoff for high versus low BAX expression by HRS cells, the 5-year FFS for patients with high versus low BAX expression was 83 versus 93% (P = 0.19 by Log-rank; Fig. 3Citation ). When the analysis was restricted to the 57 patients with Ann Arbor stage I or II or the 59 patients with Ann Arbor stage III or IV, the 5-year FFS also did not differ significantly for tumors with high versus low BAX expression.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. FFS and BAX expression in classical HD for patients treated with ABVD or equivalent regimens.

 
Twenty of 79 patients with Ann Arbor stage I-III who were treated with NOVP and radiotherapy failed. The 5-year FFS was 78 versus 79% for those with high versus low BAX expression, respectively (P = 0.45 by Log-rank). Seven of the 26 patients treated with MOPP failed. The 5-year FFS for MOPP-treated patients with any stage of disease did not significantly differ between patients with high versus low BAX expression (71 versus 81%, P = 0.6 by Log-rank). Seven of 29 patients treated only with radiotherapy failed. The 5-year FFS for patients with high versus low BAX expression was 72 versus 82% (P = 0.57 by Log-rank).

Cutoffs for BAX Expression.
Because the frequency of BAX expression appeared to be a continuous variable and because it is not intuitive which cutoff for BAX expression may promote chemotherapy-induced apoptosis, four different cutoffs for percentage of BAX-positive HRS cells were investigated: 20, 30, 50, and 75%. The selection of these cutoffs was based on the distribution of BAX-positive HRS cells (histogram) in the cases of classical HD of the present series (Fig. 2)Citation . Analysis using a cutoff of any positive HRS cells was not done, as only 15 (6%) HD tumors had BAX-negative HRS cells. As shown in Table 3Citation , there was no statistically significant difference in FFS between patients with high BAX versus low BAX expression.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3 FFS at 5 years according to the frequency of BAX expression in HRS cells of classical HDa

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
We report that BAX is frequently expressed in HRS cells of HD, but the levels of its expression are not associated with statistically different clinical outcome among uniformly treated patients. This finding is based on analysis of 260 patients from an international database, including previously untreated patients with biopsy-proven HD. Thus, we eliminated most selection biases toward presenting features and clinical outcome, which might arise by entry of patients who are accrued at relapse. Statistical analysis showed that the presenting clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients with known and unknown BAX status were similar. Therefore, we considered the study population to be representative of the entire patient population.

BAX was detected in HRS cells of 94% of patients with HD, if we consider the presence for any BAX-positive HRS cells as a criterion for positivity. These results are in concordance with those of Brousset et al. (25) , who has reported that HRS cells in 92% of tumors expressed BAX (25) . In that study, 28% of HD tumors had >75% of BAX-positive HRS cells, compared with 34% in our series (Table 4). We also report the distribution of the percentage of BAX-positive HRS cells, thus providing more detailed information for BAX expression by HRS cells of HD. The frequency of BAX expression among HRS cells of individual tumors was comparable for all histological subtypes (Table 2)Citation .

High expression of BAX (>=50% positive HRS cells) was not associated with major differences in most presenting clinical or laboratory features (Table 3)Citation . Female patients had statistically more frequently high BAX expression (P = 0.003). Younger age was also correlated with high BAX expression in HD (P = 0.05). The biological basis of these statistical associations is uncertain. Although female gender and younger age are associated with better prognosis in HD (11) , BAX expression by itself was not correlated with superior FFS in this cohort of homogeneously treated patients. In contrast, patients with high BAX expression had slightly inferior FFS, but this association was not statistically significant. Furthermore, when different cutoffs were used to distinguish high from low BAX expression, FFS does not change significantly, but the percentage of tumors with high BAX expression declines (Table 3)Citation .

The prognostic significance of BAX expression has been investigated previously in DLBCL, with conflicting results (40 , 41) . Gascoyne et al. (40) detected BAX in >1% of tumor cells in 106 of 111 DLBCL but found that it was not associated with statistically different survival. Among the 85 patients with BCL-2-negative DLBCL, BAX was expressed (>1% of tumor cells) in 78 tumors and was associated with significantly higher relapse-free and overall survival. However, the number of patients with BAX-negative tumors was very small, and multivariate analysis demonstrated that BAX expression added no additional prognostic information (40) . Using a 10% cutoff for BAX expression, Bairy et al. (41) showed that BAX-positive DLBCL was statistically more frequent in short-lived compared with long-lived patients (41) . Furthermore, in other aggressive lymphoid neoplasms, including acute lymphoblastic leukemia, high BAX expression correlated with lower relapse-free survival (42) . In our population and with a 50% cutoff for BAX expression, FFS was slightly inferior for high BAX expression, although the difference was not statistically significant.

These results are contrary to our expectations, because we suspected that high BAX expression would promote chemotherapy-induced apoptosis. Several explanations are possible for these associations with clinical outcome: (a) it is possible that the relative ratio of various proapoptotic and antiapoptotic members of the BCL-2 family, and not just BAX expression, may determine the susceptibility of tumor cells to apoptosis induced by cytotoxic agents; and (b) a conformational change in the BAX molecule is required for its insertion into the mitochondrial membrane and its subsequent binding to BCL-2, which results in release of cytochrome c and in the subsequent initiation of apoptotic cell death cascade (24) . Because the detection method used in our study is based on heat-induced antigen retrieval, the conformational change of BAX is destroyed and thus cannot be detected, as it cannot be detected on Western blots after protein denaturation.

We conclude that BAX is expressed by HRS cells in 94% of patients with HD, but the percentage of BAX-positive HRS cells varies greatly among different tumors. Expression of BAX was not associated with different presenting clinical and laboratory features or prognosis among uniformly treated patients with HD.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported in part by Cancer Center Support Grant CA-16672. G. Z. R. is a recipient of an Alexander S. Onassis Foundation Scholarship. Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Lymphoma-Myeloma, Box 429, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030. Phone: (713) 745-3129; Fax: (713) 794-5656; E-mail: gzrassidakis{at}mail.mdanderson.org Back

3 The abbreviations used are: HD, Hodgkin’s disease; FFS, failure-free survival; HRS, Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg; BH, BCL-2 homology; ABVD, doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine; NOVP, mitoxantrone, vincristine, vinblastine, and prednisone; MOPP, nitrogen mustard, vincristine, prednisone, and procarbazine; E, epirubicin; CR, complete remission; PR, partial response; NS, nodular sclerosis; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase. Back

Received 7/ 9/01; revised 10/ 8/01; accepted 11/16/01.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Longo D. L., Young R. C., Wesley M., Hubbard S. M., Duffey P. L., Jaffe E. S., De Vita V. T., Jr. Twenty years of MOPP therapy for Hodgkin’s disease. J. Clin. Oncol., 4: 1295-1306, 1986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. De Vita V. T. J., Hellman S., Jaffe E. S. Hodgkin’s disease Ed. 4 De Vita V. T. J. Hellman S. Rosenberg S. A. eds. . Cancer, Principles & Practice of Oncology, Vol. 2: 1819-1858, J. B. Lippincott Co. Philadelphia 1993.
  3. Canellos G. P., Anderson J. R., Propert K. J., Nissen N., Cooper M. R., Henderson E. S., Green M. R., Gottlieb A., Peterson B. A. Chemotherapy of advanced Hodgkin’s disease with MOPP, ABVD, or MOPP alternating with ABVD. N. Engl. J. Med., 327: 1478-1484, 1992.[Abstract]
  4. Straus D. J., Gaynor J. J., Myers J., Merke D. P., Caravelli J., Chapman D., Yahalom J., Clarkson B. D. Prognostic factors among 185 adults with newly diagnosed advanced Hodgkin’s disease treated with alternating potentially noncross-resistant chemotherapy and intermediate-dose radiation therapy. J. Clin. Oncol., 8: 1173-1186, 1990.[Abstract]
  5. Proctor S. J., Taylor P., Mackie M. J., Donnan P., Boys R., Lennard A., Prescott R. J. A numerical prognostic index for clinical use in identification of poor-risk patients with Hodgkin’s disease at diagnosis. The Scotland and Newcastle Lymphoma Group (SNLG) Therapy Working Party. Leuk. Lymphoma, 7: 17-20, 1992.
  6. Gisselbrecht C., Ferme C. Prognostic factors in advanced Hodgkin’s disease: problems and pitfalls. Towards an international prognostic index. Leuk. Lymphoma, 1: 23-24, 1995.
  7. Ferme C., Lepage E., Bastion Y., Brice P., Divine M., Lederlin P., Monconduit M., Jaubert J., Blanc M., Deconinck E., et al Advanced Hodgkin’s disease: validation of the MSKCC prognostic model. How to identify a high-risk group qualifying for intensive initial treatment? The GELA study. Ann. Oncol., 7 (Suppl. 3): 112 1996.[Free Full Text]
  8. Sarris A. H., Straus D., Preti A., Smith T., Myers J., Hess M., Pugh W. C., Cabanillas F. A prognostic model for advanced Hodgkin’s Disease at M. D. Anderson validated with an independent set of patients treated at Memorial Sloan-Kettering. Blood, 88 (Suppl.1): 893a 1996.
  9. Sarris A., Daliani D., Mesina O., Hagemeister F. B., McLaughlin P., Preti A., Romaguera J., Rodriguez M. A., Pugh W., Fuller L., et al A prognostic model for failure-free survival (FFS) of adults with clinical Ann Arbor stage (AAS) I/II Hodgkin’s disease (HD) after combined modality therapy. J. Clin. Oncol., 16: 7a 1997.
  10. Sarris A., Preti A., Mesina O., Santiago M., Hagemeister F., McLaughlin P., Rodriguez M. A., Romaguera J., Younes A., Riggs S., et al A predictive model for Failure-Free Survival (FFS) of adults with Hodgkin’s Disease treated with ABVD or equivalent regimens. Blood, 90 (Suppl. 1): 388a 1997.
  11. Hasenclever D., Diehl V. A prognostic score for advanced Hodgkin’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med., 339: 1506-1514, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Sarris A. H., O., K. K., Pethambaram P., Preti A., Tucker S., Jackow C., Messina O., Pugh W., Hagemeister F. B., McLaughlin P., et al Interleukin-10 levels are often elevated in serum of adults with Hodgkin’s disease and are associated with inferior failure-free survival. Ann. Oncol., 10: 1-8, 1999.[Free Full Text]
  13. Viviani S., Notti P., Bonfante V., Verderio P., Valagussa P., Bonadonna G. Elevated pretreatment serum levels of Il-10 are associated with a poor prognosis in Hodgkin’s Disease, the Milan Cancer Institute experience. Med. Oncol., 16: 1-5, 1999.
  14. Bohlen H., Kessler M., Sextro M., Diehl V., Tesch H. Poor clinical outcome of patients with Hodgkin’s disease and elevated interleukin-10 serum levels. Clinical significance of interleukin-10 serum levels for Hodgkin’s disease. Ann. Hematol., 79: 110-113, 2000.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Vassilakopoulos T. P., Nadali G., Angelopoulou M. K., Siakantaris M. P., Dimopoulou M. N., Kontopidou F. N., Rassidakis G. Z., Doussis-Anagnostopoulou I. A., Hatzioannou M., Vaiopoulos G., et al Serum interleukin-10 levels are an independent prognostic factor for patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Haematologica, 86: 274-281, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Kuppers R., Rajewsky K. The origin of Hodgkin and Reed/Sternberg cells in Hodgkin’s disease. Ann. Rev. Immunol., 16: 471-493, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Marafioti T., Hummel M., Anagnostopoulos I., Foss H. D., Falini B., Delsol G., Isaacson P. G., Pileri S., Stein H. Origin of nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin’s disease from a clonal expansion of highly mutated germinal-center B cells. N. Engl. J. Med., 337: 453-458, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Ohno T., Stribley J. A., Wu G., Hinrichs S. H., Weisenburger D. D., Chan W. C. Clonality in nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med., 337: 459-465, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Hummel M., Ziemann K., Lammert H., Pileri S., Sabattini E., Stein H. Hodgkin’s disease with monoclonal and polyclonal populations of Reed-Sternberg cells. N. Engl. J. Med., 333: 901-906, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Lowe S. W., Lin A. W. Apoptosis in cancer. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 21: 485-495, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Korsmeyer S. J. BCL-2 gene family and the regulation of programmed cell death. Cancer Res., 59 (Suppl. 7): 1693s-1700s, 1999.
  22. Adams J. M., Cory S. The Bcl-2 protein family: arbiters of cell survival. Science (Wash. DC), 281: 1322-1326, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Oltvai Z. N., Milliman C. L., Korsmeyer S. J. Bcl-2 heterodimerizes in vivo with a conserved homolog, Bax, that accelerates programmed cell death. Cell, 74: 609-619, 1993.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Pawlowski J., Kraft A. S. Bax-induced apoptotic cell death. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97: 529-531, 2000.[Free Full Text]
  25. Brousset P., Benharroch D., Krajewski S., Laurent G., Meggetto F., Rigal-Huguet F., Gopas J., Prinsloo I., Pris J., Delsol G., et al Frequent expression of the cell death-inducing gene Bax in Reed-Sternberg cells of Hodgkin’s disease. Blood, 87: 2470-2475, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Messineo C., Jamerson M. H., Hunter E., Braziel R., Bagg A., Irving S. G., Cossman J. Gene expression by single Reed-Sternberg cells: pathways of apoptosis and activation. Blood, 91: 2443-2451, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Xerri L., Parc P., Brousset P., Schlaifer D., Hassoun J., Reed J. C., Krajewski S., Birnbaum D. Predominant expression of the long isoform of Bcl-x (Bcl-xL) in human lymphomas. Br. J. Haematol., 92: 900-906, 1996.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Schlaifer D., March M., Krajewski S., Laurent G., Pris J., Delsol G., Reed J. C., Brousset P. High expression of the bcl-x gene in Reed-Sternberg cells of Hodgkin’s disease. Blood, 85: 2671-2674, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Brousset P., Krajewski S., Schlaifer D., Reed J. C., Delsol G. Detection of the cell death-inducing protein BAK in Reed-Sternberg cells of Hodgkin’s disease. Leuk. Lymphoma., 34: 581-584, 1999.[Medline]
  30. Harris N. L., Jaffe E. S., Diebold J., Flandrin G., Muller-Hermelink H. K., Vardiman J., Lister T. A., Bloomfield C. D. The World Health Organization classification of neoplastic diseases of the hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. Report of the Clinical Advisory Committee meeting, Airlie House, Virginia, November, 1997. Ann. Oncol., 10: 1419-1432, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Carbone P. P., Kaplan H. S., Musshoff K., Smithers D. W., Tubiana M. Report of the Committee on Hodgkin’s Disease Staging Classification. Cancer Res., 31: 1860-1861, 1971.[Free Full Text]
  32. Bonadonna G., Valagussa P., Santoro A. Alternating non-cross-resistant combination chemotherapy or MOPP in stage IV Hodgkin’s disease. A report of 8-year results. Ann. Intern. Med., 104: 739-746, 1986.
  33. Angelopoulou M. K., Vassilakopoulos T. P., Siakantaris M. P., Kontopidou F. N., Boussiotis V. A., Papavassiliou C., Kittas C., Pangalis G. A. EBVD combination chemotherapy plus low dose involved field radiation is a highly effective treatment modality for early stage Hodgkin’s disease. Leuk. Lymphoma, 37: 131-143, 2000.[Medline]
  34. Hagemeister F. B., Fuller L., McLaughlin P., Rodriguez M., Romaguera J., Swan F., Cabanillas F. NOVP and radiotherapy for early-staged Hodgkin’s disease: an interim analysis. Ann. Oncol., 4: 87-90, 1992.
  35. Viviani S., Bonfante V., Santoro A., Zanini M., Devizzi L., Di Russo A. D., Soncini F., Villani F., Ragni G., Valagussa P., et al Long-term results of an intensive regimen: VEBEP plus involved-field radiotherapy in advanced Hodgkin’s disease. Cancer J. Sci. Am., 5: 275-282, 1999.[Medline]
  36. Rassidakis G. Z., Sarris A. H., Herling M., Ford R. J., Cabanillas F., McDonnell T. J., Medeiros L. J. Differential expression of BCL-2 family proteins in ALK-positive and ALK-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma of T/null-cell lineage. Am. J. Pathol., 159: 527-535, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Bruckheimer E. M., Cho S., Brisbay S., Johnson D. J., Gingrich J. R., Greenberg N., McDonnell T. J. The impact of bcl-2 expression and bax deficiency on prostate homeostasis in vivo. Oncogene, 19: 2404-2412, 2000.[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Kaplan E. L., Meier P. Non-parametric estimation from incomplete observations. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 53: 257-481, 1958.
  39. Mantel N. Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother. Rep., 50: 163-170, 1966.[Medline]
  40. Gascoyne R. D., Krajewska M., Krajewski S., Connors J. M., Reed J. C. Prognostic significance of Bax protein expression in diffuse aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Blood, 90: 3173-3178, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Bairey O., Zimra Y., Shaklai M., Okon E., Rabizadeh E. Bcl-2, Bcl-X, Bax, and Bak expression in short- and long-lived patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. Clin. Cancer Res., 5: 2860-2866, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Hogarth L. A., Hall A. G. Increased BAX expression is associated with an increased risk of relapse in childhood acute lymphocytic leukemia. Blood, 93: 2671-2678, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
B. Sanchez-Espiridion, A. Sanchez-Aguilera, C. Montalban, C. Martin, R. Martinez, J. Gonzalez-Carrero, C. Poderos, C. Bellas, M. F. Fresno, C. Morante, et al.
A TaqMan Low-Density Array to Predict Outcome in Advanced Hodgkin's Lymphoma Using Paraffin-Embedded Samples
Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2009; 15(4): 1367 - 1375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. J. Sup, C. A. Alemany, B. Pohlman, P. Elson, S. Malhi, S. Thakkar, R. Steinle, and E. D. Hsi
Expression of bcl-2 in Classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma: An Independent Predictor of Poor Outcome
J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2005; 23(16): 3773 - 3779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. Montalban, J. F. Garcia, V. Abraira, L. Gonzalez-Camacho, M. M. Morente, J. L. Bello, E. Conde, M. A. Cruz, R. Garcia-Sanz, J. Garcia-Larana, et al.
Influence of Biologic Markers on the Outcome of Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Study by the Spanish Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group
J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2004; 22(9): 1664 - 1673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. Herling, G. Z. Rassidakis, L. J. Medeiros, T. P. Vassilakopoulos, K.-O. Kliche, G. Nadali, S. Viviani, V. Bonfante, R. Giardini, M. Chilosi, et al.
Expression of Epstein-Barr Virus Latent Membrane Protein-1 in Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg Cells of Classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Associations with Presenting Features, Serum Interleukin 10 Levels, and Clinical Outcome
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2003; 9(6): 2114 - 2120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rassidakis, G. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Sarris, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rassidakis, G. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Sarris, A. H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online