
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates |
Departments of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics [Y. N., T. C., L. C. M.] and Pathology [A. A., L. S., P. H. W.], Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0W3 Canada
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental Design: H-score analysis and a specific antibody for the immunohistochemical detection of activated MAPK in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections were used to compare expression in: (a) human breast tumors and their matched adjacent normal breast tissue; (b) primary human breast tumors and their matched lymph node metastases; and (c) primary breast tumors from patients who later proved to be sensitive or resistant to tamoxifen treatment.
Results: Active MAPK expression was detected in 48% of primary human breast tumors and was significantly increased in tumors compared with adjacent normal breast (Wilcoxon test, P = 0.027). A significant positive association (
2, P = 0.02; n = 55) was obtained between active MAPK and the presence of lymph node metastases. Moreover, increased active MAPK (Wilcoxon test, P = 0.0098) was found in concurrent lymph node metastases compared with primary breast tumors. No significant difference in active MAPK was found in primary tumors of patients who later responded to tamoxifen or did not respond to tamoxifen.
Conclusions: These data suggest that active MAPK is a marker of breast cancer metastasis and has a role in the metastatic process. However, active MAPK is unlikely to be a marker of endocrine sensitivity or involved in de novo tamoxifen resistance.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
because it can directly phosphorylate ER
on serine 118, leading to ligand-independent ER activation and the loss of tamoxifen inhibition of ER-mediated transcriptional activation (7)
. Furthermore, treatment of cells with EGF or IGF-I that activates the Ras/Raf/MAPK pathway also activates the ERs in a ligand-independent fashion, and this is accompanied by serine 118 phosphorylation of ERs (7)
. These data suggest the possibility that increased activated MAPK in estrogen target tissues in vivo could effect estrogen and antiestrogen responsiveness. Interestingly, an increased expression and activity of MAPK in human breast tumors compared with normal breast tissues were reported (8)
, although only one breast tumor case was matched to its own adjacent normal breast tissue, all others were independent samples. If confirmed, this observation suggests that increased MAPK during human breast tumorigenesis, especially in ER+ breast tumorigenesis, could also contribute to the altered estrogen action that occurs during this process (9
, 10)
. However, the relationship of activated MAPK to steroid receptor status to other known prognostic variables in breast cancer and to breast cancer progression, in particular antiestrogen sensitivity and resistance, has not been documented. In this study, we have investigated the expression of activated MAPK in human breast tissues directly in vivo using immunohistochemistry and assessed the relationship of activated MAPK expression with known prognostic variables and progression in human breast cancer. | Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cohort 1.
Twenty-six primary human breast tumor biopsies were selected. For each case, matched adjacent normal and tumor tissue blocks were available. The quality of each block and the relative cellular composition were determined by the histopathological assessment of sections from adjacent mirror image paraffin-embedded tissue blocks as described previously (11)
. The presence of normal ducts and lobules as well as the absence of any atypical lesion was confirmed in all normal tissue specimens. In three cases, the normal tissue sections did not contain normal glands and, therefore, were excluded from the normal versus tumor analysis, leaving 23 cases. The ER levels ranged from 0.8 to 83 fmol/mg protein. Five tumors were ER- and 18 were ER+. The PR levels ranged from 2.2 to 112 fmol/mg protein. Fifteen tumors were PR+ and 8 tumors were PR-. The tumors spanned a range of grades (grade scores 59) as determined by the Nottingham grading system.
Cohort 2.
To identify cases that responded divergently to tamoxifen, a review of 1000 consecutive cases identified 490 cases that were ER+ and node negative. Among these cases, 196 were identified that had been treated with adjuvant tamoxifen after surgery ± local radiation. From these cases, a subset of 15 was selected that had shown progression of disease (either dead or alive with recurrent disease, referred to as tamoxifen-resistant cases). A similar control subset (n = 14) was specifically selected to comprise cases with similar lengths of follow-up (resistant, 34 months versus sensitive, 39 months), ER status, tumor grade, and tumor histology but that showed no progression of disease (referred to as tamoxifen-sensitive cases). The ER levels for the tamoxifen-sensitive cases ranged from 4.4 to 146 fmol/mg protein, and the PR levels ranged from 9.5 to 216 fmol/mg protein. One of these tumors were PR- and the rest were PR+. The ER levels for the tamoxifen-resistant cases ranged from 4.6 to 107 fmol/mg protein, and the PR levels ranged from 8.8 to 143 fmol/mg protein. One of these tumors was PR- and the rest were PR+. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to ER levels or grade scores, however, there was a significantly statistical difference between the groups with respect to PR levels. The tamoxifen-sensitive group had a significantly (P = 0.0064, Mann-Whitney test, two-tailed) higher median PR level (40.5 fmol/mg protein) than the tamoxifen-resistant group (14.8 fmol/mg protein).
Cohort 3.
Sections from 21 primary human breast tumor samples and their matched lymph node metastases were selected. For the primary tumor samples, the ER levels, determined by ligand-binding assays, ranged from 0 to 298 fmol/mg protein. Seventeen tumors were ER+ and 4 were ER-. PR levels determined by ligand-binding assays ranged from 2.7 to 323 fmol/mg protein. Fourteen tumors were PR+ and 7 were PR-.
Antibodies.
The following antibodies specific for dually phosphorylated (active) forms of the MAPK isoforms, ERK1 and ERK2 (p44/42), were used in this study: (a) phospho-p44/42 MAPK (Thr202/Tyr204) rabbit polyclonal antibody (9101S; New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA); (b) phospho-p44/42 MAPK (Thr202/Tyr204) E10 monoclonal antibody (9106L; New England Biolabs); and (c) antiactive MAPK rabbit polyclonal antibody (V8031; Promega, Madison, WI). The antibodies used for immunohistochemistry were validated by the following method. Estrogen-depleted MCF-7 breast cancer cells were treated for 3 h with 50 µM of the MAPK kinase 1 inhibitor, PD98059 (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA), or vehicle (DMSO) alone. Half of the cells from each group was extracted and analyzed by Western blotting. The remainder was embedded in 3% agar, formalin fixed, paraffin embedded, and processed for immunohistochemistry (12)
. Western blot analysis (Fig. 1)
showed a significant decrease in the Mr 44,000/Mr 42,000 ERK 1/2 MAPK bands of the PD98059-treated cell extracts compared with the vehicle alone-treated cells using an antibody that recognized only the dually phosphorylated (active) MAPK isoforms ERK1 and ERK2. No change in total MAPK levels was seen when the blot was stripped and reprobed with an antibody recognizing total MAPK [ERK1(C-16) catalog no. sc93-G; Santa Cruz Biotechnology], supporting the conclusion that inhibition of the MAPK kinase 1 that activates ERK1 and ERK2 led to decreased detection of active MAPK with no effect on total MAPK levels, which were equivalent between the two treatment groups. Immunohistochemistry, using two different antibodies (polyclonal NEB 9101S and monoclonal NEB 9106L antibodies) to active MAPK, showed the presence of nuclear and some cytoplasmic staining in some but not all cells. The cell pellet sections were assessed by semiquantitative scoring using an H-score system, as described previously (13)
. Importantly, the intensity and the percentage of cell staining were significantly reduced in the PD98059-treated cells compared with the vehicle alone-treated cells (Fig. 2)
. The immunohistochemistry results were therefore consistent with the Western blot analysis. The polyclonal antibody (Fig. 2, B and E)
gave a better signal immunohistochemically and was used on randomly selected human breast tumor sections. The results showed little if any background staining in these tissue sections, and positive nuclear staining was seen in some of the epithelial tumor cells (Fig. 2, A and D)
. Therefore, this antibody was used for additional immunohistochemical analysis of activated MAPK in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections of human breast tissues.
|
|
Immunohistochemistry.
In all cases, tissue samples had been fixed for 1824 h in 10% buffered formalin before routine embedding in paraffin wax. Five-µm thick sections were cut, mounted on Superfrost/Plus slides (Fisherbrand), dried overnight at 37°C, dewaxed in xylene (4 min), and rehydrated in graded alcohol. DAKO EnVision System peroxidase (DAKO Diagnostics Canada, Inc.) was used for immunohistochemistry staining. After an initial pilot study using both the monoclonal (NEB 9106L) and polyclonal (NEB 9101S) antibodies, subsequent staining of human breast tissues was done using the polyclonal antibody to active MAPK. Blocking steps included peroxidase blocking reagent (0.03% hydrogen peroxide containing sodium azide) for 5 min to block endogenous peroxidase and Universal Blocker (DAKO Diagnostics Canada, Inc.) for 15 min to prevent nonspecific staining with antibody from both mouse and rabbit. Tissue sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with the primary antibody (1:250 dilution in antibody diluting buffer; DAKO Diagnostics Canada, Inc.) after an initial incubation with the same antibody at 37°C for 30 min. After the overnight incubation, slides were treated with labeled polymer (goat antirabbit and goat antimouse immunoglobulin in Tris-HCI buffer containing carrier protein and antimicrobial agent) for 30 min at room temperature. Finally, slides were incubated for 10 min with substrate 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole. Each incubation step was followed by a 2-min TBS wash twice. The slides were counterstained with hematoxylin, immersed in a bath of ammonia water, rinsed in distilled water, and a coverslip applied using an aqueous mounting medium.
Levels of expression were scored semiquantitatively under the light microscope by assessing the average signal intensity (on a scale of 03) and the proportion of cells showing a positive signal (0, none; 0.1, less than one tenth; 0.5, less than one half; and 1.0 greater than one half). The intensity and proportion scores were then multiplied to give an H-score (13) .
Statistical Analysis.
Differences between normal samples and their matched tumors were tested using the Wilcoxon matched pairs test, two-tailed. Correlation between activated MAPK expression and tumor characteristics was tested by calculation of the Spearman coefficient r. A
2 test was used to determine statistical significance of the association between active MAPK and nodal status. Fishers exact test was used to test for differences in frequency of detection of active MAPK between groups.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Activated MAPK Expression Is Not Altered between Breast Tumors That Are Tamoxifen Sensitive or Tamoxifen Resistant.
Ligand-independent activation of ERs is thought to be, at least in part, a possible mechanism associated with tamoxifen resistance in ER+ breast tumors. To determine whether activated MAPK expression could be a predictor of tamoxifen sensitivity in primary breast cancers, tumors described under cohort 2 were examined immunohistochemically as described above for activated MAPK expression. The tumors were all ER+ and node negative and were the primary tumors obtained from patients who were later treated with tamoxifen (as described above) and remained disease free (tamoxifen-sensitive cases, n = 14) or relapsed (tamoxifen-resistance cases, n = 15). Tumor characteristics are detailed in Table 1
. It should be noted that there were no statistically significant differences between the sensitive and resistant groups with respect to ER levels, tumor grade, age, or time of follow-up. However, a statistically significant difference was observed between the level of PRs in the primary tumors of the sensitive and resistant cases (Mann-Whitney rank sum test, P = 0.0064). Higher levels of PRs were observed in the primary tumors of tamoxifen-sensitive cases (median, 40.5; n = 14) versus tamoxifen-resistant cases (median, 14.8; n = 15).
|
Activated MAPK Expression Is Associated with Lymph Node Metastases.
Correlation between activated MAPK expression and tumor characteristics was tested by calculation of the Spearman coefficient r using active MAPK H-scores obtained from all tumors in both cohorts 1 and 2. No statistically significant correlations were found with grade, cellular composition, ER level, or PR level. However, a significant positive association was obtained between active MAPK expression and the presence of lymph node metastases (
2, P = 0.02). This suggested that active MAPK may be a marker of metastases and could be associated with progression in human breast cancer.
To investigate this further, an additional cohort of 21 primary human breast tumor samples and their matched lymph node metastases (cohort 3) were provided by the National Cancer Institute of Canada/Manitoba Breast Tumor Bank. Nineteen of 21 primary tumors (90%) had detectable active MAPK expression, and 19 of 21 lymph node metastases (90%) had detectable active MAPK expression. This increased frequency of detection of active MAPK expression as compared with the original cohort 1 (48%), where there was a mixture of node positive and node negative primary breast tumors, is consistent with the statistically significant association of active MAPK expression and lymph node involvement identified in cohort 1. This difference in frequency of detection between the two cohorts is significant (P = 0.0034, Fishers exact test). Also, the pattern of active MAPK detection seemed to be conserved between each primary and its matched lymph node metastasis, i.e., if the primary tumors (19 of 21) had detectable active MAPK, so did its matched lymph node metastases (19 of 21); if the primary tumor did not have detectable active MAPK (2 of 21), then its matched lymph node metastasis was also negative (2 of 19).
Activated MAPK Expression Is Increased in Lymph Node Metastases Compared with the Primary Breast Tumor.
When the level of active MAPK expression was semiquantified using H-score analysis as described in the "Materials and Methods" section, a statistically significant increase (Wilcoxon matched pairs test, P = 0.0098) in active MAPK expression was found in the lymph node metastases (median score, 1.0; n = 21) versus the primary breast tumor (median score, 0.2; n = 21). Examples of increased expression of active MAPK in lymph node metastases compared with their matched primary breast tumor are shown in Fig. 3
. These data suggest that not only is active MAPK expression a potential marker of metastasis but that it is also increased during breast cancer progression.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
50% of primary breast tumors compared with their adjacent normal breast tissues. Conclusions reached from previously published data were derived from comparisons between breast tumors and independent cases of normal breast tissue and benign breast lesions. In only one case was the sample matched from the same patient. The combined data suggest that increased expression of active MAPK frequently occurs during human breast tumorigenesis and, in part, may play a role in this process. The reasons for increased active MAPK expression are unknown, although it may, in part, be because of increased total expression of MAPK (8)
in addition to increased activity of growth factor receptor-induced cell proliferation pathways (19
, 20)
.
In examining the relationship of active MAPK expression in primary human breast tumors with known prognostic variables, increased active MAPK expression was unrelated to tumor type, tumor grade, or steroid receptor status. However, a positive association of active MAPK detection with the presence of lymph node metastases was observed. This suggests that active MAPK may be a marker of nodal metastases and poor prognosis. Furthermore, the level of active MAPK in lymph node metastases was significantly increased above that found in their matched primary tumors, suggesting the possibility that increased active MAPK may have a mechanistic role in the metastatic progression of breast tumors. Receptor tyrosine kinase activation of signal transduction pathways often includes activation of the ERK 1/2 MAPKs. Several growth factor receptor pathways are known to be deregulated in breast tumors; in particular, the c-erbB2 receptor is amplified and associated with a poor prognosis in
30% of human breast cancers (21)
. Both EGF and IGF-I receptor pathways are often increased in human breast tumors, and increased EGF receptor activity is also associated with a poor prognosis (22)
. In contrast, increased IGF receptor levels are usually associated with a good prognosis (23)
. Alterations in the extracellular environment (e.g., extracellular matrix components), which occurs during tumorigenesis and metastasis, can also affect MAPK activity (19)
. Therefore, it is possible that the increased active MAPK seen in lymph node metastases may be due, in part, to increased and/or deregulated activity of such receptor tyrosine kinase pathways, altered extracellular environment, as well as an increased level of expression of total MAPK (8)
. Therefore, multiple mechanisms are likely to be responsible for the increased active MAPK seen during breast tumorigenesis and breast cancer progression. Irrespective of the mechanism(s) by which active MAPK is increased, our data suggest that it may be an excellent marker for predicting micrometastases and identifying a subgroup of node negative breast cancers with a poor prognosis. However, this requires additional investigation.
The data presented here suggest that active MAPK is increased in breast tumors compared with their matched adjacent normal breast tissues, suggesting that active MAPK is increased during breast tumorigenesis and may have a role in breast tumorigenesis. A more detailed study of preneoplastic breast lesions would be necessary to support this hypothesis and identify the stage at which this increase occurs. However, in ER+ breast tumorigenesis, such an increase in activated MAPK may have a role in the deregulated and altered action of estrogen thought to occur during this process (2)
. Although our data suggest that increased active MAPK expression was unrelated to steroid hormone receptor status in primary breast tumors, we have found a proportion (41%) of ER+ tumors that can contain increased active MAPK expression. Because active MAPK is able to directly phosphorylate ER
(7)
and apparently induce ligand-independent activation of the receptor, the hypothesis has been suggested that this may underlie, in part, the development of tamoxifen resistance. To address this issue, we compared the expression of active MAPK in primary tumors of patients that later were classified as tamoxifen sensitive or resistant. These breast tumors were all ER+ and node negative. We found no significant differences in either the frequency of detection or the level of active MAPK expression between the primary tumors from patients that subsequently were shown to be tamoxifen sensitive and the primary tumors from patients that subsequently were shown to be tamoxifen resistant. These data suggest that active MAPK expression in ER+ primary human breast tumors is not a marker of endocrine responsiveness and is unlikely to be involved in de novo tamoxifen resistance. We cannot, however, exclude the possibility that altered active MAPK expression may be involved in acquired tamoxifen resistance. In this study, we have only measured active MAPK in the primary tumors of ER+ patients as yet unexposed to any form of adjuvant treatment. Previous data and our current data show that not all ER+ breast cancers will respond to tamoxifen treatment despite never having seen tamoxifen before. This type of resistance is referred to as de novo resistance. To study acquired tamoxifen resistance, it would be necessary in future studies to acquire biopsy material from breast cancer metastases that develop in patients whose original breast cancer responded to tamoxifen and then disease recurrence occurred during tamoxifen treatment and/or use xenograft mouse model systems of acquired tamoxifen-resistant human breast cancer cells (16)
.
In summary, we have investigated the expression of the active MAPKs ERK1 and ERK2 during human breast tumorigenesis and breast cancer progression. Significantly increased active MAPK was found in primary breast tumors compared with their adjacent matched normal breast tissues, was correlated with nodal metastasis when detected in primary breast tumors, and was significantly increased in lymph node metastases compared with their matched primary breast tumors. These data suggest that not only is active MAPK a marker of progression in human breast cancer but may also have a role in both breast cancer progression as well as breast tumorigenesis.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research/Medical Research Council of Canada and the U. S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (USAMRMC). The Manitoba Breast Tumor Bank is supported by funding from the National Cancer Institute of Canada. P. H. W. is a Medical Research Council of Canada Scientist. A. A. is funded by a Susan Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Fellowship and a USAMRMC postdoctoral award. T. C. is funded by a USAMRMC predoctoral studentship. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Manitoba Institute of Cell Biology, University of Manitoba, 675 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E OV9 Canada. Phone: (204) 787-4071; Fax: (204) 787-2190; E-mail: lcmurph{at}cc.umanitoba.ca ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: ER, estrogen receptor; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; EGF, epidermal growth factor; IGF, insulin-like growth factor; PR, progesterone receptor; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; TBS, Tris-buffered saline; NEB, New England Biolabs. ![]()
Received 8/29/01; revised 2/26/02; accepted 3/13/02.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
variant mRNA expression in estrogen independence. J. Mol. Endocrinol., 23: 325-336, 1999.[Abstract]
expression in breast cancer cells. Mol. Endocrinol., 15: 1344-1359, 2001.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Ma, J. Teruya-Feldstein, P. Bonner, R. Bernardi, D. N. Franz, D. Witte, C. Cordon-Cardo, and P. P. Pandolfi Identification of S664 TSC2 Phosphorylation as a Marker for Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Mediated mTOR Activation in Tuberous Sclerosis and Human Cancer Cancer Res., August 1, 2007; 67(15): 7106 - 7112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Mhaidat, X. D. Zhang, C. C. Jiang, and P. Hersey Docetaxel-Induced Apoptosis of Human Melanoma Is Mediated by Activation of c-Jun NH2-Terminal Kinase and Inhibited by the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 1/2 Pathway Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2007; 13(4): 1308 - 1314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. E. Weitsman, L. Li, G. P. Skliris, J. R. Davie, K. Ung, Y. Niu, L. Curtis-Snell, L. Tomes, P. H. Watson, and L. C. Murphy Estrogen Receptor-{alpha} Phosphorylated at Ser118 Is Present at the Promoters of Estrogen-Regulated Genes and Is Not Altered Due to HER-2 Overexpression. Cancer Res., October 15, 2006; 66(20): 10162 - 10170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N Sarwar, J-S Kim, J Jiang, D Peston, H D Sinnett, P Madden, J M Gee, R I Nicholson, A E Lykkesfeldt, S Shousha, et al. Phosphorylation of ER{alpha} at serine 118 in primary breast cancer and in tamoxifen-resistant tumours is indicative of a complex role for ER{alpha} phosphorylation in breast cancer progression. Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2006; 13(3): 851 - 861. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Glaros, N. Atanaskova, C. Zhao, D. F. Skafar, and K. B. Reddy Activation Function-1 Domain of Estrogen Receptor Regulates the Agonistic and Antagonistic Actions of Tamoxifen Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2006; 20(5): 996 - 1008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. K. Pandey, T. S. Udayakumar, X. Lin, D. Sharma, P. S. Shapiro, and J. D. Fondell Activation of TRAP/Mediator Subunit TRAP220/Med1 Is Regulated by Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase-Dependent Phosphorylation Mol. Cell. Biol., December 15, 2005; 25(24): 10695 - 10710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L C Murphy, B Peng, A Lewis, J R Davie, E Leygue, A Kemp, K Ung, M Vendetti, and R Shiu Inducible upregulation of oestrogen receptor-{beta}1 affects oestrogen and tamoxifen responsiveness in MCF7 human breast cancer cells J. Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2005; 34(2): 553 - 566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. C. Murphy, Y. Niu, L. Snell, and P. Watson Phospho-Serine-118 Estrogen Receptor-{alpha} Expression Is Associated with Better Disease Outcome in Women Treated with Tamoxifen Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2004; 10(17): 5902 - 5906. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Vicent, M. Garayoa, J. M. Lopez-Picazo, M. D. Lozano, G. Toledo, F. B. J. M. Thunnissen, R. G. Manzano, and L. M. Montuenga Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Phosphatase-1 Is Overexpressed in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Is an Independent Predictor of Outcome in Patients Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2004; 10(11): 3639 - 3649. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Raguz, M. Tamburo De Bella, G. Tripuraneni, M. J. Slade, C. F. Higgins, R. C. Coombes, and E. Yague Activation of the MDR1 Upstream Promoter in Breast Carcinoma as a Surrogate for Metastatic Invasion Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2004; 10(8): 2776 - 2783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Murphy, T. Cherlet, A. Adeyinka, Y. Niu, L. Snell, and P. Watson Phospho-Serine-118 Estrogen Receptor-{alpha} Detection in Human Breast Tumors in Vivo Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2004; 10(4): 1354 - 1359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. B. Izevbigie, J. L. Bryant, and A. Walker A Novel Natural Inhibitor of Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinases and Human Breast Cancer Cell Growth Experimental Biology and Medicine, February 1, 2004; 229(2): 163 - 169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. I. Nicholson, I. R. Hutcheson, J. M. Knowlden, H. E. Jones, M. E. Harper, N. Jordan, S. E. Hiscox, D. Barrow, and J. M. W. Gee Nonendocrine Pathways and Endocrine Resistance: Observations with Antiestrogens and Signal Transduction Inhibitors in Combination Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2004; 10(1): 346S - 354S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Eisenmann, M. W. VanBrocklin, N. A. Staffend, S. M. Kitchen, and H.-M. Koo Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathway-Dependent Tumor-Specific Survival Signaling in Melanoma Cells through Inactivation of the Proapoptotic Protein Bad Cancer Res., December 1, 2003; 63(23): 8330 - 8337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Jorgensen, R. Holm, G. M. Maelandsmo, and V. A. Florenes Expression of Activated Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinases 1/2 in Malignant Melanomas: Relationship with Clinical Outcome Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2003; 9(14): 5325 - 5331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Handra-Luca, H. Bilal, J.-C. Bertrand, and P. Fouret Extra-Cellular Signal-Regulated ERK-1/ERK-2 Pathway Activation in Human Salivary Gland Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma: Association to Aggressive Tumor Behavior and Tumor Cell Proliferation Am. J. Pathol., September 1, 2003; 163(3): 957 - 967. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Zheng, P. Fiumara, Y. V. Li, G. Georgakis, V. Snell, M. Younes, J. N. Vauthey, A. Carbone, and A. Younes MEK/ERK pathway is aberrantly active in Hodgkin disease: a signaling pathway shared by CD30, CD40, and RANK that regulates cell proliferation and survival Blood, August 1, 2003; 102(3): 1019 - 1027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |