Clinical Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garcia-Manero, G.
Right arrow Articles by Issa, J.-P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garcia-Manero, G.
Right arrow Articles by Issa, J.-P. J.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 8, 1897-1903, June 2002
© 2002 American Association for Cancer Research


Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates

DNA Methylation Patterns at Relapse in Adult Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia1

Guillermo Garcia-Manero2, Carlos Bueso-Ramos, Jerry Daniel, Jason Williamson, Hagop M. Kantarjian and Jean-Pierre J. Issa

Departments of Leukemia [G. G-M., J. D., J. W., H. M. K., J-P. J. I.] and Hematopathology [C. B-R.], University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Purpose: Aberrant DNA methylation of promoter-associated CpG islands is an epigenetic DNA modification observed in acute leukemias that in certain cases has been associated with a poor prognosis and increased relapse rates. To study the role of DNA methylation in relapse mechanisms in acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), we have compared the methylation status of five genes at the time of initial presentation and at first relapse in 25 adult patients with ALL.

Experimental Design: Genes studied included the estrogen receptor (ER), multidrug resistance gene 1 (MDR1), p73, p15, and p16. DNA was extracted from paraffin-embedded bone marrow biopsies. DNA methylation was analyzed using PCR of bisulfite-modified DNA.

Results: Results indicate that methylation at the time of relapse was stable in 92% of patients for p73, 88% for ER, 80% for p16, 72% for MDR1, and 60% for p15. Only one case had p16 methylation at initial presentation, whereas 6 patients (P = 0.0001) had methylation at relapse. Three cases had concomitant methylation of p15 and p16 at relapse. The degree of MDR1 methylation inversely correlated with the presence of MDR1 expression as detected by immunohistochemistry. Eighteen patients (72%) had acquired no or one methylation change, whereas the rest (28%) had methylation changes in two or three genes. No clinical-biological correlations were found between methylation of any particular gene or pattern.

Conclusions: In summary, DNA methylation patterns are stable in a majority of patients with relapsed ALL, but a subset of patients acquire new methylation changes, in particular affecting cell cycle regulatory genes.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
DNA methylation refers to the addition of a methyl group to the cytosine in a cytosine-guanosine pair (CpG). CpG pairs are underrepresented in eukaryotic genomes but can be found at near-expected frequency in intergenic repetitive sequences such as Alu repeats or in the proximity of gene promoters. Methylation of these promoter-associated areas has been associated with gene silencing and is a physiological compensatory dosage mechanism in X-linked and imprinted genes. By silencing functionally relevant genes, aberrant DNA methylation has been linked to diverse human pathologies (1) , including cancer (2) and aging (3) . Aberrant methylation of multiple promoter-associated CpG islands has been found in acute leukemias (4, 5, 6) . These studies have revealed that subgroups of patients with acute leukemia are characterized by a hypermethylator phenotype defined by the simultaneous methylation of multiple genes. This is similar to the CpG island methylator phenotype described in colon cancer (7) and suggests that aberrant methylation is an important oncogenic mechanism in acute leukemias.

Methylation of several genes has been associated with poor prognosis in patients with acute leukemia. Hypermethylation of the calcitonin gene has been associated with poor prognosis and disease progression in ALL3 (8, 9, 10) . This phenomenon has also been observed for HIC1 (11) and WT-1 (12) in AML. In contrast, hypermethylation of ER has been associated with a better prognosis in AML (13) , although abnormal methylation of this gene is also found at the time of relapse (14) . In bladder cancer, hypomethylation of the MDR1 gene has been associated with protein reexpression and a chemoresistant phenotype at relapse (15) . p15 and p16, two cell cycle regulatory genes, are considered tumor suppressor genes. Diverse abnormalities of these two genes, including p15 methylation, have been shown to be acquired at the time of relapse in pediatric ALL (16) . Methylation of p15 has been shown to confer poor prognosis and to predict the risk of relapse in patients with acute leukemias (17 , 18) . Methylation of p16, a rare event in human leukemias (6 , 19) , has been associated with disease progression in adult T-cell leukemia (20) . Other lymphoid neoplasms, such as non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas, also are characterized by abnormal methylation of these two genes, a phenomenon also associated with relapse (21) . These findings suggest that aberrant methylation may have a role in leukemic relapse. Knowledge of the dynamics of methylation patterns at the time of relapse may have important implications, including the understanding of cellular clonal changes during disease progression, the development of assays to detect MRD, and the development of targeted therapies using hypomethylating agents for high-risk patients.

We have previously studied the methylation status of ER, MDR1, p73, p15, p16, THBS1, THBS2, CD10, c-abl, and Myod in 80 patients with ALL (6) . We have selected five of them, ER, MDR1, p73, p15, and p16, to study the methylation patterns both at the time of initial presentation and at relapse in 25 patients with relapsed ALL who had achieved complete remission after initial induction chemotherapy. Our results indicate that the methylation patterns of patients with relapsed ALL are stable in a majority of patients, but that a subgroup of patients acquire new methylation changes, in particular of genes involved in cell cycle regulation.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Samples.
Paraffin-embedded bone marrow biopsies from 25 adult patients with ALL obtained at the time of original diagnosis and at first relapse have been analyzed in this study. Patients were selected from a cohort of 80 patients studied previously (6) . Selection was based on evidence of relapse and sample availability (both at initial presentation and relapse). All patients had been treated with the hyper-CVAD chemotherapy program (protocol DM92-048) at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (22) . Patient characteristics and results of this program have been reported elsewhere (22) . Consent for sample collection was obtained from all patients following institutional guidelines. This study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board.

Bisulfite Modification of DNA.
Methods for bisulfite modification of DNA and subsequent PCR techniques used in this study are described in detail.4 Bisulfite induces deamination of unmethylated cytosines, converting unmethylated CpG sites to UpG without modifying methylated sites. This allows their differentiation by allele specific PCR (MSP), restriction digestion (COBRA) or sequencing. Bisulfite treatment of genomic DNA was performed as described (23) . DNA was extracted using standard phenol-chloroform methods after samples had been deparaffinized using xylene and ethanol followed by digestion with proteinase K. After extraction, 2 µg of DNA were used for bisulfite treatment. DNA was denatured in 0.2 N NaOH at 37°C for 10 min and incubated with 3 M sodium bisulfite at 50°C for 16 h. DNA was then purified using the Wizard cleanup system (Promega) and desulfonated with 0.3 N NaOH at 25°C for 5 min. DNA was then precipitated with ammonium acetate and ethanol, washed with 70% ethanol, dried, and resuspended in H2O.

Primer Design.
Primer sequences, coordinates, GenBank accession numbers, number of expected restriction fragments, and PCR conditions are shown in Table 1Citation . For p73 and p16, we used MSP as described elsewhere (19 , 24) . For p15, MDR1, and ER, we used COBRA (25) . To minimize overestimation of methylated alleles when using this method, the following points were followed: (a) primers were designed to contain a minimum number of CpG dinucleotides in their sequence to avoid biased amplification of methylated alleles. If primers contained CpG sites, they were designed to amplify methylated and unmethylated equally (with a mixture of C or T used for the sense strand or G or A for antisense primers); (b) primers were designed to contain a maximum number of thymidines converted from cytosines to avoid amplification of the nonconverted genomic sequence; (c) amplification of genomic DNA not treated with bisulfite was always carried out to monitor lack of nonspecific amplification; (d) primers were designed to be within 300 bp of known transcription start sites; and (e) for each set of primers, we tested: (i) multiple restriction enzymes to confirm the methylation status and sequence of the fragment analyzed; and (ii) performed mixing experiments (using methylated and unmethylated templates mixed at a known ratios) to exclude any potential amplification bias.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Genes studied

 
PCR and Restriction Digestion.
PCR reactions were carried in 50-µl reactions. In each reaction, 2 µl of bisulfite-treated DNA were used, as well as 1.25 mM deoxynucleotide triphosphate, 6.7 mM MgCl2, 5 µl of PCR buffer, 1 nmol of primers and 1 unit of Taq polymerase. All PCR reactions were performed using a hot start at 95°C for 5 min. After amplification, except for p73 and p16, PCR products were digested with specific restriction enzymes that digest alleles that were methylated prior to bisulfite treatment (25) and separated in nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels. Gels were stained with ethidium bromide. The proportion of methylated versus unmethylated product (digested versus undigested) was quantitated by densitometric analysis, determining the density of methylation. Densitometric analysis was performed using a Bio-Rad Geldoc 2000 digital analyzer equipped with the Quantity One version 4.0.3 software. For both p73 and p16, we used MSP as described (19 , 24) .

Immunocytochemistry.
Immunohistochemical staining for MDR was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections of bone marrow biopsy or aspiration clot sections, an avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex method, and an automated immunostainer (Dako, Carpinteria, CA). All tissue sections underwent heat-induced epitope retrieval using citrate buffer (pH 6.0). After rinsing in PBS, an anti-MDR1 antibody (1:25 dilution of C-19 goat polyclonal IgG; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) was applied as primary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. The detection system used was LSAB2 detection kit (Dako). Negative and positive controls were also run.

Statistical Analyses.
Criteria for stable, increased, or decreased methylation were defined based on the technique used. For MSP (used for p73 and p16), stable methylation was considered if the samples at original presentation and relapse were either methylated or unmethylated at both endpoints, increased methylation if the bone marrow at presentation showed no methylation but there was evidence of methylation at relapse, and decreased methylation if only the initial presentation sample showed evidence of methylation. For COBRA (used in ER, p15, and MDR1), methylation was stable if the samples had a density of methylation of 0–2% at both endpoints or more than that at both endpoints, increased methylation if the initial sample had a density of 0–2% and >5% at relapse, and decreased methylation if the sample had a density of methylation >5% at initial presentation and <2% at relapse. Methylation patterns refer to the number of methylated or unmethylated genes in a single patient. For those genes for which COBRA was used to measure methylation, and thus a qualitative analysis could be performed, we used a t test for dependent samples to compare the methylation status at initial presentation and at relapse. For those two genes where MSP was used (p73 and p16) and only a qualitative analysis could be performed, we used the McNemar {chi}2 test. Correlation coefficients were computed using Spearman rank correlation coefficients. Variables analyzed include individual gene methylation values and the patient characteristics age, gender, WBC, hemoglobin, platelet counts, albumin, ß2-microglobulin, cytogenetics, immunophenotype, and systemic and central nervous system risk at presentation (22) . Definition of CR and disease-free survival have been described elsewhere (22) . Estimated 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival were based on the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences were tested using the log-rank test.


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Patient Population.
We have analyzed the methylation status of ER, MDR1, p73, p15, and p16 from paraffin-embedded biopsies from 25 patients with ALL obtained at the time of initial presentation and at relapse. All patients were enrolled in the hyper-CVAD program at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (22) . All patients had achieved CR prior to relapse. The clinical-pathological features of these patients are summarized in Table 2Citation .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2 Patient characteristics

 
Methylation Status of Five Selected Genes.
To study methylation patterns at the time of initial presentation and relapse in ALL, we have analyzed the methylation status of five genes in 25 adult patients with adult ALL. Genes studied included ER, MDR1, p73, p15, and p16. Different criteria were used for gene selection. ER, MDR1, p15, and p73 are known to be methylated in ALL (6 , 14 , 17 , 24 , 26) . Methylation of ER and p15 have also been shown to correlate with disease progression (17 , 27) . Expression of MDR1 has been correlated with a chemoresistant phenotype in bladder cancer (15) . MDR1 expression has been associated with a poor prognosis in elderly patients with AML (28) . p16 is infrequently methylated in ALL (6 , 19) , but it has been found to be deleted at higher frequency in relapse pediatric ALL (16) .

For all these genes, except for p73, we have analyzed four to five normal bone marrow specimens, none of which showed significant (>2%) methylation (data not shown). p73 has been shown not to be methylated in normal marrow (24) . Fig. 1Citation shows representative examples of methylation for each gene. Table 3Citation summarizes the distribution of methylation densities for each individual gene both at initial presentation and at relapse. Definitions for stable, increased, and decreased methylation are given above. ER methylation remained stable in 22 cases (88%) of cases, increased in 2 (8%), and decreased in 1 (4%). MDR1 methylation was stable in 18 cases (72%), increased in 4 (16%), and decreased in 3 (12%), and p15 remained stable in 15 (60%), increased in 7 (28%), and decreased in 3 (12%). The methylation status of p73 and p16 was analyzed using MSP; therefore, no quantitative analysis could be performed. For p73, 23 cases remained stable (92%), whereas 1 increased and 1 decreased (4% each). p16 remained stable in 20 cases (80%) but increased in 5 (20%; P = 0.0001; Fig. 2Citation ). No case of p16 demethylation was observed.



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Changes in DNA methylation at relapse in ALL. For ER, MDR1, and p15, we have analyzed DNA methylation using COBRA (bisulfite PCR followed by restriction enzyme digestion). pre, initial presentation samples; post, relapsed samples. Top arrow, unrestricted, unmethylated product; bottom arrow, restricted, methylated product. The name of the cell line used as control is indicated in the top right-most lane. For p73 and p16, DNA methylation has been analyzed using MSP. Two different PCR reactions were carried out, one with primers specific for the methylated sequence (p73-m and p16-m) and one with primers for the unmethylated sequence (p73-um and p16-um). A sample was considered methylated if a band was visualized in the methylated reaction.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3 Distribution of methylation densities at initial presentation and at relapse in ALL

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Gene-specific variations in DNA methylation at relapse in ALL. The DNA methylation characteristics of five genes were studied both at initial presentation and at relapse in 25 patients with ALL. Two different techniques have been used in this study: COBRA for ER, MDR1, and p15, and MSP for p73 and p16. A patient was considered as having stable methylation if the samples at original presentation and relapse were either methylated or unmethylated at both endpoints (for MSP) or if the samples had a density of methylation of 0–2% at both endpoints or more than that at both endpoints (for COBRA), as having increased methylation if the bone marrow at presentation showed no methylation but there was evidence of methylation at relapse (for MSP) or if the initial sample had a density of 0–2% and >5% at relapse (for COBRA), or as having decreased methylation if only the initial presentation sample showed evidence of methylation (MSP) or if the sample had a density of methylation >5% at initial presentation and <2% at relapse.

 
The analysis of multiple genes at presentation and relapse allows the evaluation and comparison of methylation patterns at relapse (Table 4)Citation . Eighteen patients (72%) had changes (increased or decreased methylation) of 0 or 1 genes. Three patients had methylation changes of two genes (12%) and 4 patients (16%) had changes in three genes, including 1 patient with complete demethylation of all three previously methylated genes. Of importance, of the 5 cases with increased p16 methylation at relapse, 3 had concomitant increase in p15 methylation and 1 was methylated at p15 at initial presentation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4 Methylation patterns and individual patient clinical dataa

 
DNA Methylation Status Correlates with Protein Expression.
DNA methylation has been associated with transcriptional inactivation and gene silencing. To demonstrate that the changes in DNA methylation observed in this study correlated with the level of gene activation, we performed immunohistochemical analysis of MDR1 in cases with known methylation densities. Because of the sample source, we could not study RNA levels. Three paired samples with known methylation levels were blindly evaluated for MDR1 expression by a hematopathologist. None of the samples studied with methylation of MDR1 had detectable levels of the corresponding protein by immunostaining, whereas all unmethylated samples had evidence of protein expression, representing an excellent correlation between DNA methylation and MDR1 protein expression.

Clinical and Pathological Correlates.
Using Spearman Rank correlation analysis, we have explored possible correlations between methylation of a particular locus or methylation pattern with clinical and pathological characteristics and known prognostic factors in ALL. Methylation patterns analyzed included patients with 0–1 methylation changes versus more than one gene and patients with concomitant p15 and p16 methylation. Factors analyzed included age, gender, WBC, hemoglobin, platelet counts, albumin, ß2-microglobulin, cytogenetics, immunophenotype, and systemic and central nervous system risk at presentation. No significant association was found between methylation of any of the genes studied, any of the above patterns, and any of the studied clinical characteristics. Next, we studied the impact of gene-specific methylation and methylation patterns on second CR rate, duration of first and second remission, and overall survival. No correlation with second CR rate, duration of first and second remission, or overall survival was observed.


    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In the present study, we have analyzed the methylation patterns at the time of initial presentation and relapse in 25 adult patients with ALL. Results indicate that the methylation status of the five genes analyzed remained stable at relapse in 60–92% of the cases, depending on the gene studied. As a consequence, methylation patterns are not altered at the time of relapse in a majority of patients (72%), although a significant minority (28%) acquires changes at relapse. These changes most frequently involved MDR1, p15, and p16. It is important to note that p16 methylation is significantly increased at relapse, and that this is usually accompanied by concomitant p15 methylation. No associations were observed between methylation at initial presentation and any of the clinical-biological characteristics analyzed or with CR rates, disease-free survival, or overall survival.

This is the first study to simultaneously analyze the methylation status of multiple genes both at initial presentation and relapse in an homogeneously treated cohort of patients. ER is frequently methylated in acute leukemias and has been shown to track with disease activity in ALL (14) . Although ER methylation has been shown to confer good prognosis to patients with AML (13) , we were unable to demonstrate such observation in a large series of ALL patients (6) . ER methylation remains stable at relapse in close to 90% of the cases studied. Unfortunately, its role in disease prognostication and in MRD evaluation is limited because ER methylation is observed in nonneoplastic tissues (27) . p73 is a p53 homologue that has been shown to be selectively methylated in lymphoid malignancies but not in normal tissues (24 , 26) . No prior information exists regarding its methylation frequency in relapsed ALL. In our series, this gene remains stable in >90% of cases, suggesting that evaluation of p73 methylation could have a role in studies of MRD in ALL. Expression of MDR1 has been shown to correlate with a poorer prognosis in elderly patients with AML (28) . Methylation of MDR1 has been shown to correlate with the level of expression and resistance in leukemia cell lines and in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (29) . In bladder cancer, methylation of MDR1 has been shown to inversely correlate with MDR1 overexpression, an effect promoted by exposure to chemotherapy. In our series, MDR1 methylation remained stable in 72% of cases, the rest of cases affected both by demethylation and hypermethylation of the gene. These changes in methylation density correlated with the level of MDR1 protein expression. Several studies have analyzed the role of p15 and p16 abnormalities in relapse ALL. In a study of pediatric ALL (16) , p16 was shown to be deleted at relapse in 5 of 18 samples (30%). The same study also evaluated p15 deletion and methylation at relapse; 3 of 18 (16%) cases acquired p15 deletion at relapse. All 3 cases had also acquired concomitant p16 deletion. Four of these cases were evaluated for p15 methylation both at initial presentation and at relapse; in 2 cases, methylation appeared at relapse; 1 case remained unmethylated; and 1 case was demethylated.

There are several limitations to our study. The first one is related to the number of patients and genes studied. Obviously, by increasing the number of patients, we could have observed relevant clinical-biological associations not found presently. Also, by studying more genes, we could have found other important genes aberrantly methylated at relapse. The second limitation is related to the techniques used to study methylation. In this study, we used archival paraffin-embedded biopsies, the only relapse material available to us. The source and small quantity of DNA obtained precluded the use Southern blot as done in prior studies. Bisulfite sequencing of PCR fragments, the current gold standard for methylation analyses, would have required close to 2500 sequencing reactions to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the cohort studied here. To circumvent these issues, we have used two different methods, depending on the genes studied. Both techniques, COBRA and MSP, exploit the modification of DNA by bisulfite. By specifically deaminating nonmethylated cytosines, it allows the design of specific primers for unmethylated and methylated sequences (MSP) or the use of specific restriction enzymes (COBRA). Because we are comparing the methylation patterns at both endpoints, the results obtained should be representative of the methylation changes occurring in the promoter areas of the genes analyzed.

It is important to emphasize that in the present study, we have not attempted to evaluate the role of p15 and p16 deletions in relapse ALL, nor have we attempted to clarify whether the methylation changes are acquired in the initial dominant malignant cell or whether they represent a shift toward a selected cellular clone at relapse.

To our knowledge, this is the most extensive study of DNA methylation at the time of relapse in ALL. It is important to note that all patients studied here were treated homogeneously with the same chemotherapy program. Although these results need to be confirmed in prospective larger scale studies, this work has important implications in the understanding of relapse mechanisms in leukemia. The results suggest that relapse in ALL is dominated by the original cellular malignant clone in a majority of patients, but a subgroup of patients acquires methylation changes at relapse. The frequency of concomitant methylation of p16 and p15, together with the high rate of deletions reported by other groups (30) , confirms the important role of these two genes in relapsed leukemia. The fact that we have not found any defining clinical or biological characteristic of this subgroup of patients is probably a result of the relatively few patients studied. These results have implications in the development of methylation techniques to study MRD in ALL. Genes such as p73 and p16 could be used to monitor disease progression in patients with ALL. The information obtained could be used to treat patients still in morphological remission with hypomethylating agents. The use of 5-aza-2-deoxycytidine could also be explored for remission maintenance in patients with known methylation patterns.

In summary, our results indicate that methylation patterns at relapse in ALL are stable in a majority of patients and confirm the importance of p15 and p16 in relapsed leukemia.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Sherry Pierce for data management and analysis.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 This study was supported in part by a Translational Research Grant from the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society of America and Research Grant RPG-99-098-01 from the American Cancer Society (to J-P. J. I.). G. G-M. is the recipient of a Career Development Award from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the Peggy Howard Memorial Fund. Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Leukemia, Box 428, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030. Phone: (713) 745-3428; Fax: (713) 794-4297; E-mail: ggarciam{at}mdanderson.org Back

3 The abbreviations used are: ALL, acute lymphocytic leukemia; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; MRD, minimal residual disease; ER, estrogen receptor; MDR1, multidrug resistance 1; CR, complete remission; MSP, methylation-specific PCR; COBRA, combined bisulfite restriction analysis. Back

4 Internet address: http://www.mdanderson.org/leukemia/methylation. Back

Received 11/15/01; accepted 3/14/02.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Robertson K. D., Wolffe A. P. DNA methylation in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Genet., 1: 11-19, 2000.[Medline]
  2. Herman J. G. Hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes in cancer. Semin. Cancer Biol., 9: 359-367, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Toyota M., Issa J. P. CpG island methylator phenotypes in aging and cancer. Semin. Cancer Biol., 9: 349-357, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Melki J. R., Vincent P. C., Clark S. J. Concurrent DNA hypermethylation of multiple genes in acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Res., 59: 3730-3740, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Toyota M., Kopecky K. J., Toyota M. O., Jair K. W., Willman C. L., Issa J. P. Methylation profiling in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood, 97: 2823-2829, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Garcia-Manero G., Daniel J., Pierce S., Kornblau S., Kantarjian H., Issa J-P. CpG island methylation profile in acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL). Blood, 96: 102a 2000.
  7. Toyota M., Ahuja N., Ohe-Toyota M., Herman J. G., Baylin S. B., Issa J. P. CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96: 8681-8686, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Leegwater P. A., Lambooy L. H., De Abreu R. A., Bokkerink J. P., van den Heuvel L. P. DNA methylation patterns in the calcitonin gene region at first diagnosis and at relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Leukemia (Baltimore), 11: 971-978, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Thomas X., Teillon M. H., Belhabri A., Rimokh R., Fiere D., Magaud J. P., Archimbaud E. Hypermethylation of calcitonin gene in adult acute leukemia at diagnosis and during complete remission. Hematol. Cell Ther., 41: 19-26, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Roman J., Castillejo J. A., Jimenez A., Bornstein R., Gonzalez M. G., Del Carmen Rodriguez M., Barrios M., Maldonado J., Torres A. Hypermethylation of the calcitonin gene in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia is associated with unfavourable clinical outcome. Br. J. Haematol., 113: 329-338, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Issa J. P., Zehnbauer B. A., Kaufmann S. H., Biel M. A., Baylin S. B. HIC1 hypermethylation is a late event in hematopoietic neoplasms. Cancer Res., 57: 1678-1681, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Plass C., Yu F., Yu L., Strout M. P., El-Rifai W., Elonen E., Knuutila S., Marcucci G., Young D. C., Held W. A., Bloomfield C. D., Caligiuri M. A. Restriction landmark genome scanning for aberrant methylation in primary refractory and relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: involvement of the WIT-1 gene. Oncogene, 18: 3159-3165, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Li Q., Kopecky K. J., Mohan A., Willman C. L., Appelbaum F. R., Weick J. K., Issa J. P. Estrogen receptor methylation is associated with improved survival in adult acute myeloid leukemia. Clin. Cancer Res., 5: 1077-1084, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Issa J. P., Zehnbauer B. A., Civin C. I., Collector M. I., Sharkis S. J., Davidson N. E., Kaufmann S. H., Baylin S. B. The estrogen receptor CpG island is methylated in most hematopoietic neoplasms. Cancer Res., 56: 973-977, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Tada Y., Wada M., Kuroiwa K., Kinugawa N., Harada T., Nagayama J., Nakagawa M., Naito S., Kuwano M. MDR1 gene overexpression and altered degree of methylation at the promoter region in bladder cancer during chemotherapeutic treatment. Clin. Cancer Res., 6: 4618-4627, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Maloney K. W., McGavran L., Odom L. F., Hunger S. P. Acquisition of p16(INK4A) and p15(INK4B) gene abnormalities between initial diagnosis and relapse in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood, 93: 2380-2385, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Wong I. H., Ng M. H., Huang D. P., Lee J. C. Aberrant p15 promoter methylation in adult and childhood acute leukemias of nearly all morphologic subtypes: potential prognostic implications. Blood, 95: 1942-1949, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Tien H. F., Tang J. H., Tsay W., Liu M. C., Lee F. Y., Wang C. H., Chen Y. C., Shen M. C. Methylation of the p15(INK4B) gene in myelodysplastic syndrome: it can be detected early at diagnosis or during disease progression and is highly associated with leukaemic transformation. Br. J. Haematol., 112: 148-154, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Herman J. G., Civin C. I., Issa J. P., Collector M. I., Sharkis S. J., Baylin S. B. Distinct patterns of inactivation of p15INK4B and p16INK4A characterize the major types of hematological malignancies. Cancer Res., 57: 837-841, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Nosaka K., Maeda M., Tamiya S., Sakai T., Mitsuya H., Matsuoka M. Increasing methylation of the CDKN2A gene is associated with the progression of adult T-cell leukemia. Cancer Res., 60: 1043-1048, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Martinez-Delgado B., Richart A., Garcia M. J., Robledo M., Osorio A., Cebrian A., Rivas C., Benitez J. Hypermethylation of P16ink4a and P15ink4b genes as a marker of disease in the follow-up of non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. Br. J. Haematol., 109: 97-103, 2000.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Kantarjian H. M., O’Brien S., Smith T. L., Cortes J., Giles F. J., Beran M., Pierce S., Huh Y., Andreeff M., Koller C., Ha C. S., Keating M. J., Murphy S., Freireich E. J. Results of treatment with hyper-CVAD, a dose-intensive regimen, in adult acute lymphocytic leukemia. J. Clin. Oncol., 18: 547-561, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Clark S. J., Harrison J., Paul C. L., Frommer M. High sensitivity mapping of methylated cytosines. Nucleic Acids Res., 22: 2990-2997, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Corn P. G., Kuerbitz S. J., van Noesel M. M., Esteller M., Compitello N., Baylin S. B., Herman J. G. Transcriptional silencing of the p73 gene in acute lymphoblastic leukemia and Burkitt’s lymphoma is associated with 5' CpG island methylation. Cancer Res., 59: 3352-3356, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Xiong Z., Laird P. W. COBRA: a sensitive and quantitative DNA methylation assay. Nucleic Acids Res., 25: 2532-2534, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Kawano S., Miller C. W., Gombart A. F., Bartram C. R., Matsuo Y., Asou H., Sakashita A., Said J., Tatsumi E., Koeffler H. P. Loss of p73 gene expression in leukemias/lymphomas due to hypermethylation. Blood, 94: 1113-1120, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Issa J. P., Baylin S. B., Herman J. G. DNA methylation changes in hematologic malignancies: biologic and clinical implications. Leukemia., 11: ((Suppl.1))S7-S11, 1997.
  28. Leith C. P., Kopecky K. J., Godwin J., McConnell T., Slovak M. L., Chen I. M., Head D. R., Appelbaum F. R., Willman C. L. Acute myeloid leukemia in the elderly: assessment of multidrug resistance (MDR1) and cytogenetics distinguishes biologic subgroups with remarkably distinct responses to standard chemotherapy. A Southwest Oncology Group study. Blood, 89: 3323-3329, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Kantharidis P., El-Osta A., deSilva M., Wall D. M., Hu X. F., Slater A., Nadalin G., Parkin J. D., Zalcberg J. R. Altered methylation of the human MDR1 promoter is associated with acquired multidrug resistance. Clin. Cancer Res., 3: 2025-2032, 1997.[Abstract]
  30. Maloney K. W., McGavran L., Odom L. F., Hunger S. P. Different patterns of homozygous p16INK4A and p15INK4B deletions in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemias containing distinct E2A translocations. Leukemia (Baltimore), 12: 1417-1421, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
A. Scuto, M. Kirschbaum, C. Kowolik, L. Kretzner, A. Juhasz, P. Atadja, V. Pullarkat, R. Bhatia, S. Forman, Y. Yen, et al.
The novel histone deacetylase inhibitor, LBH589, induces expression of DNA damage response genes and apoptosis in Ph- acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells
Blood, May 15, 2008; 111(10): 5093 - 5100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. Bueso-Ramos, Y. Xu, T. J. McDonnell, S. Brisbay, S. Pierce, H. Kantarjian, G. Rosner, and G. Garcia-Manero
Protein Expression of a Triad of Frequently Methylated Genes, p73, p57Kip2, and p15, Has Prognostic Value in Adult Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia Independently of Its Methylation Status
J. Clin. Oncol., June 10, 2005; 23(17): 3932 - 3939.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ASH ANNUAL MEETING ABSTRACTSHome page
K. Hoshino, H. Yang, B. Sanchez-Gonzalez, and G. Garcia-Manero
Detection of Aberrant DNA Methylation in Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia (ALL) Using a Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Assay.
Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts), November 16, 2004; 104(11): 998 - 998.
[Abstract]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. S. Liu, R. C.-Y. Leung, K. Y.-K. Chan, P.-M. Chiu, A. N.-Y. Cheung, K.-F. Tam, T.-Y. Ng, L.-C. Wong, and H. Y.-S. Ngan
p73 Expression Is Associated with the Cellular Radiosensitivity in Cervical Cancer after Radiotherapy
Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2004; 10(10): 3309 - 3316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. Zheng, X. Ma, L. Zhang, L. Gunn, M. T. Smith, J. L. Wiemels, K. Leung, P. A. Buffler, and J. K. Wiencke
Hypermethylation of the 5' CpG Island of the FHIT Gene Is Associated with Hyperdiploid and Translocation-Negative Subtypes of Pediatric Leukemia
Cancer Res., March 15, 2004; 64(6): 2000 - 2006.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
L. Shen, M. Toyota, Y. Kondo, T. Obata, S. Daniel, S. Pierce, K. Imai, H. M. Kantarjian, J.-P. J. Issa, and G. Garcia-Manero
Aberrant DNA methylation of p57KIP2 identifies a cell-cycle regulatory pathway with prognostic impact in adult acute lymphocytic leukemia
Blood, May 15, 2003; 101(10): 4131 - 4136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
A. El-Osta, M. Lubbert, P. W. Wijermans, T. Licht, and P. A. Jones
On the use of DNA methylation inhibitors and the reversal of transcriptional silencing
Blood, February 15, 2003; 101(4): 1656 - 1657.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
L. Shen, Y. Kondo, J.-P. Issa, G. Garcia-Manero, J. Roman-Gomez, J. A. Castillejo, A. Torres, and A. Jimenez
Lack of p21CIP1 DNA methylation in acute lymphocytic leukemia
Blood, October 16, 2002; 100(9): 3432 - 3433.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garcia-Manero, G.
Right arrow Articles by Issa, J.-P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garcia-Manero, G.
Right arrow Articles by Issa, J.-P. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online