
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Experimental Therapeutics, Preclinical Pharmacology |
Biology Division [Y. T., T. K., A. O., M. N., J. Y.], Pathology Division [T. N., T. Y., A. M.], and Cancer Information and Epidemiology Division [K. Y.], National Cancer Center Research Institute and Thoracic Surgery Division [H. K.], National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan; First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Gunma, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan [Y. T., R. S.]; and Hamon Center for Therapeutic Oncology Research, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390 [J. D. M.]
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental Design: Association of RASSF1A methylation with clinicopathological features, allelic imbalance at 3p21.3, p53 mutations, and K-ras mutations was examined in 110 stage I lung adenocarcinomas.
Results: Thirty-five of 110 (32%) tumors showed RASSF1A methylation. RASSF1A methylation was dominantly detected in tumors with vascular invasion (P = 0.0242) or pleural involvement (P = 0.0305), and was observed more frequently in poorly differentiated tumors than in well (P = 0.0005) or moderately (P = 0.0835) differentiated tumors. Furthermore, RASSF1A methylation correlated with adverse survival by univariate analysis (P = 0.0368; log-rank test) as well as multivariate analysis (P = 0.032,; risk ratio 2.357; 95% confidence interval, 1.0755.169). The correlation between RASSF1A methylation and allelic imbalance at 3p21.3 was significant (P = 0.0005), whereas the correlation between RASSF1A methylation and p53 mutation was borderline (P = 0.0842). However, there was no correlation or inverse correlation between RASSF1A methylation and K-ras mutation (P = 0.2193).
Conclusions: These results indicated that epigenetic inactivation of RASSF1A plays an important role in the progression of lung adenocarcinoma, and that RASSF1A hypermethylation appears to be a useful molecular marker for the prognosis of patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Lung cancer is a major cause of cancer-related deaths in the world. In recent years, adenocarcinoma has replaced squamous cell carcinoma as the most frequent histological subtype in lung cancers (14
, 15)
. Prognosis of patients is largely dependent on the stage of the disease. However, even in patients with stage I NSCLC, the 5-year survival rate is
65% (16
, 17)
. Because there are only a few prognostic parameters that can estimate survival, it is important to identify a marker for high-risk early stage patients who should benefit from more aggressive treatment approaches.
Here, we investigated the association of RASSF1A methylation with clinicopathological features in 110 cases of stage I lung adenocarcinoma by the MSP method. RASSF1A methylation was detected dominantly in tumors with vascular invasion or pleural involvement, and was observed more frequently in poorly differentiated tumors than in well-differentiated tumors. Furthermore, RASSF1A methylation correlated with adverse survival in patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma. The results indicated that epigenetic inactivation of RASSF1A plays an important role in the acquisition of aggressive phenotypes in lung adenocarcinoma and that RASSF1A methylation is a marker for prognosis of patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
AI Analysis of the RASSF1A Locus.
The following microsatellite loci were examined for AI at 3p21.3: D3S4622/LUCA4.1, D3S4604/LUCA19.1, and D3S4597/P1.5, because these markers were mapped to the regions flanking and close to the RASSF1 gene locus (5)
. Primers were end labeled with fluorochromes FAM, HEX, or NED. PCR amplifications were carried out in a 20 µl reaction mixture containing 10 mM Tris HCl (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 pmol of each primer, 250 µM of each deoxynucleotide triphosphate, and 0.5 unit of Taq DNA polymerase (Takara, Osaka, Japan). Thirty-five cycles of 94°C (30 s) for denaturation, 55°C (30 s) for annealing, and 72°C (30 s) for extension were performed to amplify DNA fragments. The loading mix was prepared with 12 µl of deionized formamide and 0.5 µl of ABI size standard 400HD (Perkin-Elmer). Each loading sample contained this loading mix plus 0.33 µl each of FAM-, HEX-, and NED-labeled PCR products. The fluorescent signals were laser scanned, and the data were stored electronically by the ABI310 sequencer/genotyper. The intensity of the peak heights was calculated by the Genotyper2.1 software to ascertain the ratios of allele intensities in tumor DNA as compared with the corresponding normal tissue DNA. Normal tissue samples showed small differences in the percentage of allele ratio because of artificial signal variation (SD 5.4%, n = 40). Thus, a signal ratio in the range of 0.761.0 could occur even without AI in a tumor because the mean -2 SD per mean +2 SD was 0.76. Therefore, a sample was scored as having AI if the signal ratio was <0.76.
Mutational Analysis of the K-ras Gene.
Codons 12, 13, and 61 of the K-ras gene were examined for mutation by PCR amplification and direct sequencing of PCR products. The primer sets for codons 12 and 13 of the K-ras gene were 5'-GACTGAATATAAACTTGTGG-3' (forward) and 5'-CTATTGTTGGATCATATTCG-3' (reverse), and the primer sets for codon 61 were 5'-TTCCTACAGGAAGCAAGTAG (forward) and 5'-CACAAAGAAAGCCCTCCCCA-3' (reverse), as reported previously (21)
. Thirty-five cycles of 94°C (30 s) for denaturation, 55°C (60 s) for annealing, and 72°C (30 s) for extension were performed to amplify DNA fragments for codons 12 and 13 of the K-ras gene. Touchdown PCR was used for the amplification of DNA fragment for codon 61 of the K-ras gene. Touchdown PCR had an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 5 min, which was followed by 10 touchdown cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 1 min at 60°C with a decrease in the annealing temperature by 1°C each cycle, and 30 s at 72°C. This was followed by 25 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 1 min at 50°C, and 30 s at 72°C, with a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. PCR products were purified for sequencing by a QIAquick PCR Purification kit (Qiagen). Cycle sequencing was performed using the ABI PRISM Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction kit (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT) and the ABI PRISM 310 DNA Sequencer (Perkin-Elmer).
Mutational Analysis of the p53 Gene.
Ten portions of genomic DNA fragments covering the entire coding region of the p53 gene, between exon 2 and exon 11, were amplified by PCR with p53-specific oligonucleotide primers: 5'-TTGGAAGTGTCTCATGCTGG-3' (forward) and 5'-GTGGTGGCCTGCCCTTCC-3' (reverse) for exon 2, 5'-CCCCTAGCAGAGACCTGTG-3' (forward) and 5'-CCCTCCAGGTCCCCAGC-3' (reverse) for exon 3, 5'-GAGGACCTGGTCCTCTGAC-3' (forward) and 5'-CCAGGCATTGAAGTCTCATG-3' (reverse) for exon 4, 5'-ACTTGTGCCCTGACTTTCAAC-3' (forward), and 5'-CAACCAGCCCTGTCGTCTC-3' (reverse) for exon 5, 5'-AGGGTCCCCAGGCCTCTG-3' (forward) and 5'-AACCCCTCCTCCCAGAGAC-3' (reverse) for exon 6, 5'-GCGCACTGGCCTCATCTTG-3' (forward) and 5'-GCCAGTGTGCAGGGTGGC-3' (reverse) for exon 7, 5'-GGTAGGACCTGATTTCCTTAC-3' (forward) and 5'-TCTCCTCCACCGCTTCTTG-3' (reverse) for exon 8, 5'-GTGCAGTTATGCCTCAGATTC-3' (forward) and 5'-AAACTTTCCACTTGATAAGAGG-3' (reverse) for exon 9, 5'-ATCTTTTAACTCAGGTACTGTG-3' (forward) and 5'-GAGTAGGGCCAGGAAGGG-3' (reverse) for exon 10, and 5'-ACCCTCTCACTCATGTGATG-3' (forward) and 5'-GATGGGGGTGGGAGGCTG-3' (reverse) for exon 11. PCR amplification was carried out in a 25-µl reaction mixture containing 0.6 unit of TaKaRa Ex Taq (Takara) for exons 4 and 5, and AmpliTaq Gold (Perkin-Elmer) for exons 2, 3, and 611. Thirty-five cycles of 94°C (60 s) for denaturation, 60°C (60 s) for annealing, and 72°C (90 s) for extension were performed to amplify DNA fragments for exons 4 and 5. Thirty-five cycles (for exons 7 and 10) or 40 cycles (exons 2, 3, 6, 8, 9, and 11) of 94°C (20 s) for denaturation, 58°C (30 s) for annealing, and 72°C (30 s) for extension were performed to amplify DNA fragments. The sizes of PCR products were from 99 to 367 bp. Denatured and reannealed PCR products were analyzed by the WAVE DNA Fragment Analysis System and WAVEMAKER Software 4.0 (TRANSGENOMIC Inc., Omaha, NE). PCR products with detected variant peaks by the WAVE DNA Fragment Analysis System were purified by a QIAquick PCR Purification kit (Qiagen) for sequencing. Cycle sequencing was performed using the ABI PRISM Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction kit (Perkin-Elmer) and the ABI PRISM 310 DNA Sequencer (Perkin-Elmer).
Statistical Analysis.
Fishers exact test was used to examine the association of two categorical variables. The survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the resulting curves were compared using the log-rank test. A P of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. The joint effect of covariables was examined using the stepwise Cox proportional hazards regression model. The stepwise procedure was used to select significant independent variables. The probability of the statistic used to test whether a variable should be included or excluded was 0.2. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows statistical package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
We then analyzed the correlation of RASSF1A methylation with AI at 3p21.3, p53 mutations, and K-ras mutations (Table 2)
. Among 103 informative cases, 22 of 42 (52%) tumors with AI at 3p21.3 showed RASSF1A methylation, whereas 11 of 61 (18%) tumors without AI at 3p21.3 showed RASSF1A methylation. The correlation between RASSF1A methylation and AI at 3p21.3 was statistically significant (P = 0.0005). RASSF1A methylation was detected in 16 of 37 (43%) tumors with p53 mutations and detected in 19 of 73 (26%) tumors without p53 mutations. The statistical significance of the correlation between RASSF1A methylation and p53 mutation was borderline (P = 0.0842). We found K-ras mutations in 13 tumors. Among the 13 tumors, 11 (85%) tumors did not show RASSF1A methylation, whereas 2 (15%) tumors showed RASSF1A methylation. However, there was no statistically significant correlation or inverse correlation between RASSF1A methylation and K-ras mutation (P = 0.2193).
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Noguchi et al. (25)
have reported histological subtypes for the small size lung adenocarcinoma measuring
2 cm in the greatest dimension. In this report, type C (LBAC with foci of active fibroblastosis) is considered to be an advanced carcinoma, which is progressed from type A (LBAC) or type B (LBAC with foci of collapsed alveolar structure), and patients with type D (poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma) have a worse prognosis than patients with types A, B, and C. We classified small adenocarcinomas, up to 2 cm in dimension, used in the present study according to Noguchis classification (Table 1)
. Interestingly, RASSF1A methylation was detected in all 4 of the type D tumors, but not in any of 3 type A tumors, and RASSF1A methylation was more frequently detected in types C and D tumors (9 of 22; 41%) than in types A and B tumors (2 of 11; 18%), although the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.2585; Table 1
). Therefore, it is possible that inactivation of RASSF1A could be involved in a series of morphologically distinct changes in carcinogenesis and progression of lung adenocarcinoma.
The RASSF1A gene is located at chromosome 3p21.3 that frequently undergoes LOH in lung cancers. Recently, it was reported that two of three breast cancers with LOH at 3p21.3 had hypermethylation of the RASSF1A promoter region (26) . We demonstrated here that RASSF1A methylation significantly correlated with AI at 3p21.3 in lung adenocarcinoma (P = 0.0005). These results suggested that the RASSF1A gene is inactivated in accordance with the Knudson two-hit model, including epigenetic mechanisms of gene inactivation (27) . However, there were a number of tumors with RASSF1A methylation without AI at 3p21.3 and with AI at 3p21.3 without RASSF1A methylation. It was also reported that only 6 of 22 NSCLC with 3p21.3 allele loss had RASSF1A methylation (12) . In the cases with retention of 3p21.3 alleles with RASSF1A methylation, both alleles may be inactivated by hypermethylation of the promoter region of the RASSF1A gene. In the cases with AI at 3p21.3 alleles without RASSF1A methylation, other TSGs may be a target of AI. In fact, there are several candidate TSGs at 3p21.3 (8 , 28, 29, 30, 31) .
Recent studies have shown that several genes on chromosome 3p other than RASSF1 are also methylated in lung cancers. The SEMA3B gene located
60 kb distal to RASSF1 was shown to be inactivated by methylation in lung cancer cell lines (31)
. In addition, the FHIT gene at 3p14.2 and the RARß gene at 3p24 have been shown to be inactivated by methylation in primary lung cancers (32
, 33)
. Therefore, it is likely that multiple genes on 3p are methylated in lung cancers. It is possible that the methylation of a gene among them correlates more strongly with AI on 3p as well as prognosis than that of RASSF1A. Additional genetic and functional studies should be done on those genes, including RASSF1A, to elucidate the pathogenetic significance of methylation of those genes for the development of lung cancers.
The presence of a Ras association domain in RASSF1A suggests that these proteins may function as effectors of Ras signaling (or signaling of a Ras-like molecule) in cells. Therefore, it was important to analyze the relationship between RASSF1A methylation and K-ras mutation in the current series of tumors. The present study showed that there was no significant correlation or inverse correlation between RASSF1A methylation and K-ras mutation. Therefore, it is possible that inactivation of RASSF1A does not activate K-ras signaling in tumorigenic mechanisms. However, because K-ras mutations were detected in only 13 cases, this negative correlation could be because of the few cases for statistical analysis. In fact, only 2 of 35 (6%) tumors with RASSF1A methylation showed K-ras mutations, implying that there may be an inverse correlation between RASSF1A methylation and K-ras mutation. It was reported that RASSF1C binds Ras in a GTP-dependent manner (11) . Because RASSF1A has the identical Ras associate domain, it is possible that RASSF1A binds to Ras in the same manner as RASSF1C. Therefore, additional investigations in a larger population and functional studies to assess the role of RASSF1A in Ras-dependent growth control will be required.
Multiple TSGs are involved in lung carcinogenesis (1) , and p53 plays a central role in tumor progression (34) . In the present study, we showed that RASSF1A methylation was weakly correlated with p53 mutations. These results suggest that epigenetic inactivation of RASSF1A and p53 mutations play a cooperative role in progression of lung adenocarcinoma. In fact, p53 mutations were also detected more frequently in types C and D tumors (8 of 22; 36%) than in types A and B tumors (0 of 11; 0%; data not shown). However, because RASSF1A methylation but not p53 mutation showed significant correlation with poor prognosis of patients with stage I adenocarcinoma, RASSF1A could play a more dominant role than p53 in the progression of lung adenocarcinoma.
In conclusion, RASSF1A methylation was significantly correlated with vascular invasion, pleural involvement, poor differentiation, and poor survival of patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma. As expected, there was also a correlation between RASSF1A methylation and AI at 3p21.3. These results indicate that epigenetic inactivation of RASSF1A, which appears to be one of the target TSGs at 3p21.3, plays an important role in the progression of lung adenocarcinoma. Additional investigations will be required to elucidate the importance of RASSF1A methylation as a diagnostic and prognostic marker in the management of early stage lung adenocarcinoma and to elucidate the role of RASSF1A in cell signaling.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid from the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare for the 2nd-term Comprehensive 10-Year Strategy for Cancer Control; Grants-in-Aid from the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare and from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan; National Cancer Institute USA Grants Specialized Programs of Research Excellence P50 CA70907 and R01 CA71618; and the G. Harold and Leila Y. Mathers Charitable Foundation. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Biology Division, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 1-1, Tsukiji 5-chome, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan. Phone: 81-3-3547-5272; Fax: 81-3-3542-0807. ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: TSG, tumor suppressor gene; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; CI, confidence interval; LOH, loss of heterozygosity; AI, allelic imbalance; MSP, methylation-specific PCR; LBAC, localized bronchioloalveolar carcinoma. ![]()
Received 11/29/01; revised 4/ 2/02; accepted 4/ 3/02.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(2)
auxiliary subunit gene (CACNA2D2). J. Biol. Chem., 275: 12237-12242, 2000.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Donninger, M. D. Vos, and G. J. Clark The RASSF1A tumor suppressor J. Cell Sci., September 15, 2007; 120(18): 3163 - 3172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gu, D. Berman, C. Lu, I. I. Wistuba, J. A. Roth, M. Frazier, M. R. Spitz, and X. Wu Aberrant Promoter Methylation Profile and Association with Survival in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2006; 12(24): 7329 - 7338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. T. Kim, S. J. Park, S. H. Lee, H. J. Kang, S. Hahn, C. H. Kang, S. W. Sung, and J. H. Kim Prognostic implication of aberrant promoter hypermethylation of CpG islands in adenocarcinoma of the lung J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2005; 130(5): 1378 - 1378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Tomizawa, H. Iijima, N. Sunaga, K. Sato, A. Takise, Y. Otani, S. Tanaka, T. Suga, R. Saito, T. Ishizuka, et al. Clinicopathologic Significance of the Mutations of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2005; 11(19): 6816 - 6822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Agathanggelou, W. N. Cooper, and F. Latif Role of the Ras-Association Domain Family 1 Tumor Suppressor Gene in Human Cancers Cancer Res., May 1, 2005; 65(9): 3497 - 3508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Tommasi, R. Dammann, Z. Zhang, Y. Wang, L. Liu, W. M. Tsark, S. P. Wilczynski, J. Li, M. You, and G. P. Pfeifer Tumor Susceptibility of Rassf1a Knockout Mice Cancer Res., January 1, 2005; 65(1): 92 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Das and R. Singal DNA Methylation and Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., November 15, 2004; 22(22): 4632 - 4642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Wang, J. J. Lee, L. Wang, D. D. Liu, C. Lu, Y.-H. Fan, W. K. Hong, and L. Mao Value of p16INK4a and RASSF1A Promoter Hypermethylation in Prognosis of Patients with Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2004; 10(18): 6119 - 6125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.-H. Kim, J. S. Kim, J.-H. Park, S. K. Lee, Y.-I. Ji, Y. M. Kwon, Y. M. Shim, J. Han, and J. Park Relationship of Ras Association Domain Family 1 Methylation and K-Ras Mutation in Primary Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cancer Res., October 1, 2003; 63(19): 6206 - 6211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ohira, R. M. Gemmill, K. Ferguson, S. Kusy, J. Roche, E. Brambilla, C. Zeng, A. Baron, L. Bemis, P. Erickson, et al. WNT7a induces E-cadherin in lung cancer cells PNAS, September 2, 2003; 100(18): 10429 - 10434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.-H. Kim, J. S. Kim, Y.-I. Ji, Y. M. Shim, H. Kim, J. Han, and J. Park Hypermethylation of RASSF1A Promoter Is Associated with the Age at Starting Smoking and a Poor Prognosis in Primary Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cancer Res., July 1, 2003; 63(13): 3743 - 3746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kuroki, F. Trapasso, S. Yendamuri, A. Matsuyama, H. Alder, N. N. Williams, L. R. Kaiser, and C. M. Croce Allelic Loss on Chromosome 3p21.3 and Promoter Hypermethylation of Semaphorin 3B in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cancer Res., June 15, 2003; 63(12): 3352 - 3355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |