
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Minireviews |
and Cancers1
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center/University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Los Angeles, California 90048
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(PPAR
) ligands have anticancer activity against a wide variety of neoplastic cells in vitro. Animal studies have chronicled their in vivo anticancer effects and chemopreventive capabilities. In addition, moderate anticancer activities of PPAR
ligands with minimal toxicities have been observed in patients with liposarcomas and prostate cancers. These compounds can slow growth and induce partial differentiation of selected cancer cells. They can decrease levels of cyclin D1 and E, inflammatory cytokines, and nuclear factor
B and increase expression of p21waf1 and p27kip1. Surprisingly, some or many of these effects may occur independently of PPAR
. Other data suggest that PPAR
may behave as a tumor suppressor gene, although several compelling murine models, paradoxically, suggest that under selected circumstances, PPAR
ligands may stimulate cancer formation. Nevertheless, the bulk of studies showed that PPAR
ligands do have antiproliferative activity against many transformed cells and may be helpful in the setting of adjuvant and chemopreventive treatments of several common tumors, including colon, prostate, and breast cancers. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3
is a member of the NHR superfamily (1, 2, 3, 4)
. It functions as a transcription factor after it heterodimerizes with the RXR and binds to specific response elements called peroxisome proliferating response elements (5)
. To act as a transcription factor, PPAR
requires activation by binding its ligand. Furthermore, the RXR member of this complex can also bind simultaneously with its ligand, which can result in enhanced transcriptional activity (6)
. The activated PPAR
/RXR heterodimer attaches to the peroxisome proliferating response element of a target gene, and coactivator proteins are recruited such as p300 (CBP), SRC-1, as well as the Drip205 family of proteins (also know as TRAP 220) to modulate gene transcription (7)
. Different ligands of PPAR
appear to be able to recruit different coactivators (8
, 9)
, which might provide specificity of biological activity of PPAR
.
Adipocyte tissue has some of the highest levels of PPAR
. However, the receptor is expressed in many other tissues and cell types throughout the body, including monocytes and macrophages (10)
, liver (11, 12, 13)
, skeletal muscle (14)
, breast (15)
, prostate (16)
, colon, and type 2 alveolar pneumocytes. Two PPAR
isoforms are derived by alternate promoter usage. Most tissue express the PPAR
1 isoform, whereas the PPAR
2 isoform is specific to adipocytes. Although a formal study has not been reported, cancer cells probably express an equivalent amount of PPAR
as their normal counterparts.
The 15-deoxy-
12,14-prostaglandin J2 is a naturally occurring PPAR
ligand. This eicosanoid can activate PPAR
at micromolar concentrations. Some unsaturated fatty acids also are natural ligands of the receptor. Synthetic PPAR
ligands, known as TZDs, include rosiglitazone (Avandia), pioglitazone (Actos), and troglitazone (Rezulin). The latter causes a severe idiosyncratic liver problem and thus has been discontinued. The TZDs are a breakthrough in the therapy of type II diabetes melitis because they decrease insulin resistance. TZDs enhance insulin action by increasing glucose uptake in the peripheral tissue as well as reducing the hepatic glucose output, and a strong correlation occurs between the ability of the ligand to activate PPAR
and the antidiabetic potency of the PPAR
ligand. A recently synthesized triterpinoid [2-cyano-3,12-divoaleana-1,9-diene-28-oic acid] can bind to PPAR
and can induce differentiation and inhibit proliferation of a variety of cancer cells; and it has anti-inflammatory activity (17
, 18)
.
Most of the known target genes that are transcriptionally activated by PPAR
belong to the pathway of metabolism and transport of lipids, including lipoprotein lipase, adipsin, fatty acid binding protein, Acyl-CoA synthase, and fatty acid transport protein. Furthermore, the PPAR
can mediate differentiation of the preadipocyte to adipocytes (19, 20, 21)
. The ligands of PPAR
can also repress transcription. For example, in monocytes and macrophages, they can lower the expression of cytokines such as IL-4 as well as proinflammatory products, including TNF, IL-1, as well as inducible nitric oxide synthetase (22, 23, 24, 25, 26)
. The proinflammatory transcription factors such as AP1, Stat, and NF-
B can also be inhibited. The mechanism by which this occurs is unclear. PPAR
can form weak interactions with the corepressors NCOR and SMRT (27)
. On the other hand, the repression produced by these compounds may be independent of acting as a ligand of PPAR
(discussed later). The target genes that mediate the anticancer activity of the activated PPAR
are unclear.
Cancer and PPAR
Cancer cells often obtain their proliferative advantage over their normal counterparts at least, in part, because of their inability to undergo terminal differentiation. They remain in the proliferative pool providing themselves with a growth advantage. Activation of NHRs has been identified as an approach to induce differentiation and inhibit proliferation of cancer cells. The best example of this paradigm is the induction of remission of patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia using all-trans-retinoic acid (28
, 29)
. All-trans-retinoic acid has also been used to prevent recurrence of head and neck cancers. Because normal preadipocytes can be induced to undergo terminal differentiation in the presence of ligands for PPAR
, investigators were encouraged to use TZDs to attempt to induce differentiation of human liposarcoma cells in vivo (30)
. Successes in vitro encouraged these same physician-scientists to give troglitazone to a series of patients with liposarcoma, which resulted in a retardation of growth and induction of differentiation of these tumor cells (31)
. The long-term effect of TZD on liposarcomas requires further study; nevertheless, these pioneer studies have spurred the examination of the effect of TZDs on a number of cancers both in vitro and in vivo. Table 1
provides a list of cancers in which PPAR
ligands have been shown to have an antiproliferative activity.
|
ligands in cancer cells that provide the antiproliferative and prodifferentiation activity are unclear. Often, the expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p21Waf1 and p27Kip1 increase in the cancer cells exposed to PPAR
ligands, perhaps by inhibition of the ubiquitin-proteosome protein degradation pathway (32
, 33)
. Perhaps blunting of expression or activity of a variety of inflammatory cytokines and transcription factors (i.e., TNF, IL-1, IL-4, NF-
B) may slow growth of the transformed cells. Also, the PPAR
ligand can induce apoptosis of cells with the activation of caspase-3; this is associated in some cancer cells with a decreased expression of the antiapoptotic proteins, BCL-2 and BCL-XL. DNA microarray technology was used to attempt to identify target genes of PPAR
in colon cancer cells using PPAR
agonists and antagonists. Many of the PPAR
selected targets were linked to the growth regulatory pathways (34)
.
Colon Cancer
Approximately 5% of individuals will develop colorectal carcinoma during their lifetime. It typically progresses from adenomatous polyps, dysplastic polyps to invasive carcinoma (35
, 36)
. Colon cancer cells usually have a very high expression of PPAR
(13
, 37
, 38)
. Table 2
provides several key observations concerning colon cancer and PPAR
and its ligands. Several epidemiological studies suggest that PPAR
ligands have an anticolonic cancer activity. Polyunsaturated fatty acids such as those present in fish oil, as well as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, can activate PPAR
, and their consumption is associated with prevention of colon cancer (39
, 40)
. Also, more directly, TZDs (5 x 10-610-5 M) decreased the growth of colon cancer cells in vitro as well as when growing as xenografts in nude mice (41)
. These levels can be achieved clinically (42)
. A rough correlation exists between sensitivity of the colon cancer cells to their inhibition of proliferation by TZDs and their level of expression of PPAR
(13)
.
|
have been reported in colon cancers (36)
. In a large collection of 55 colon cancer samples, four somatic PPAR
mutations were found, three in exon 5 and one in exon 3. These mutations included one nonsense, two missense, and one frameshift mutation. The alterations affected the function of PPAR
and were not found in normal leukocytes of the same individuals, showing that these changes were not hereditary (36)
. The paradigm for most tumor suppressor genes is mutation of one allele and loss of the second allele, which is not the case for PPAR
in colon cancer. Each of the cancers with a mutant PPAR
also had a normal PPAR
allele. This suggests that the altered protein could either exert a dominant negative effect on the normal PPAR
gene product, or loss of 50% expression of PPAR
enhances the transformation to colon cancer. The approximate 50% loss of protein expression as a result of loss of an allele is known as haplo-insufficiency. Other examples of haplo-insufficiency include monoallelic germ-line RET mutations in Hirschsprun disease (43)
, monoallelic germ-line mutations of PTEN leading to Cowden Syndrome associated with a risk of development of breast and thyroid tumors (44)
, and monoallelic germ-line mutations of the AML1 gene associated with familial thrombocytopenia progressing to myelodysplastic syndrome and eventually to acute myeloid leukemia (45)
.
The frequency of PPAR
mutations in colon cancer is unclear. We examined 380 tumors and cell lines, including 55 colon cancers, and were unable to find any samples that had a PPAR
mutation (46)
. This suggests that PPAR
mutations may occur in cancers, but they are exceedingly rare.
A murine model does point to the protective role of PPAR
. Mice with heterozygous germ-line deletions of PPAR
(PPAR
+/-) have an increased proclivity to develop carcinogen-induced colon cancer compared with wild-type mice (47)
. After injection of azoxymethane, all of the PPAR
+/- mice, but only 50% of the wild-type mice, were dead of colon cancer by 36 weeks.
In contrast to the above investigations and observations, data from several groups draw into question the anticolonic cancer activity of PPAR
ligands. Two studies have shown that administration of a TZD to Mim mice resulted in these mice developing more frequent colon cancers than those animals which did not receive this PPAR
ligand (48
, 49)
. Mim mice have a germ-line mutation of the APC gene resulting in an increased frequency of small and large intestinal adenocarcinomas. In one of these studies, the Mim mice that received troglitazone had an average of three colonic cancers/mouse, whereas those that received diluent had a mean of one colonic cancer/mouse (48)
. The Mim mice in the second study received two different PPAR
ligands; and these mice also had more colon tumors, which were also larger than the similarly treated wild-type mice. The number of small intestinal cancers was unchanged between the two groups, consistent with very little expression of PPAR
in the small intestine (49)
.
Why do Mim mice receiving a TZD have more colon cancers and what does it mean for humans? The answers to both queries are unclear. The APC protein normally binds to ß-catenin, retaining the latter in the cytoplasm and enhancing its degradation. Mutant APC loses this ability, and thus, the colons of Mim mice have high levels of ß-catenin, which enters the nucleus, and binds and increases the activity of the family of transcription factors, called TCFs. This leads to the transcriptional activation of a number of cell cycle-related proteins, including c-myc and cyclin D1 (50
, 51)
. The treatment of Mim mice with TZDs, for unclear reasons, increases the expression of ß-catenin in their colons (49)
. In contrast, the normal colonic epithelium, as it undergoes differentiation from the crypts to the tip of the villi, decreases its expression of ß-catenin, which dampens the growth promoting effects of TCFs. Thus, Mim mice appear to have a dysregulation of the normal differentiation process. This has relevance for humans because mutation of the APC gene is often the initiating event for
8090% of sporadic colorectal tumors (52)
.
Evidence has implicated PPAR
in contributing to the development of colon cancer. Colon cancer cells often have high expression of PPAR
(53)
, perhaps because inactivating mutations of APC leads to an active ß-catenin/TCF4 transcription complex, which can enhance transcription of PPAR
(36
, 51
, 53
, 54)
. PPAR
can have an antiapoptotic effect on colon cancer cells, thus providing these cells a growth advantage over their normal counterparts (54)
. PPAR
may bind to the same target genes as PPAR
, but it also binds tightly to corepressors. Therefore, PPAR
may silence PPAR
target genes similar to how retinoic acid receptor responsive genes are repressed by PML-retinoic acid receptor
in acute promyelocytic leukemia.
Furthermore, the COX-2 gene is highly expressed in
7080% of human colorectal carcinomas (55
, 56)
. These high levels of COX-2 can result in elevated production of prostaglandin H2 that is rapidly converted to prostaglandin PGI2, PGF2
, PGD2, and thromboxane A2. Prostaglandin I2 can activate PPAR
(57
, 58) . Thus, colon cancer cells can have stimulation of PPAR
from two directions, APC mutations causing hyperactivity of ß-catenin/TCF4 and high levels of COX-2.
Interestingly, when COX-2 knockout mice were mated with Mim mice, the number and size of intestinal polyps markedly decreased consistent with COX-2, playing an important role in promoting the development of tumors in the APC mutant genetic background (59, 60, 61)
. Likewise, treatment of Mim mice with selective COX-2 inhibitors can reduce the number of polyps that develop (59)
. Clearly, additional studies are required to determine the role of ligands of PPAR
in both the prevention and treatment of colon cancer. Also, the importance of PPAR
in colon cancer requires additional investigation.
Breast Cancer
Breast cancer is one of the most frequent malignancies in females, with one woman in eight or nine developing breast cancer in her life. Breast cancer cells often express prominent levels of PPAR
. Table 3
provides several salient observations concerning breast cancer and PPAR
. A couple of studies have shown that 10-610-5 M TZDs can inhibit proliferation and induce differentiation-like changes in breast cancer cell lines both in vitro and growing in nude mice (15
, 62)
.
|
ligand synergistically inhibited the growth and induced apoptosis of a series of breast cancer cell lines both in vitro and in xenografts growing in nude mice (62)
. This was associated with a decreased number of cells in S phase and an increased percentage of cells in G0-G1. Up to 3040% of the breast cancer cells cultured with a TZD and a retinoid became apoptotic with a fall in their levels of bcl-2. This apoptosis could be overcome by forced overexpression of bcl-2 in these cells (62)
.
In vivo experiments have shown that administration of a PPAR
ligand (GW7845) inhibited the development of carcinogen-induced breast cancer in rats (63)
. Another in vivo study showed troglitazone also prevented carcinogen (7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene)-induced transformation of murine breast tissues (64)
. Furthermore, the addition of a retinoid to the PPAR
ligand greatly enhanced their abilities to prevent the transformation of the breasts (64)
. Of interest, mice who have a heterozygous germ-line deletion of PPAR
(PPAR
+/-) have a greater susceptibility to develop breast and ovarian cancers after their exposure to 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene, suggesting that PPAR
has a protective role against development of these cancers (65)
.
In a series of interesting experiments with somewhat quizzical results, mice were genetically modified so that they constitutively expressed high levels of PPAR
in their breast tissue. These transgenic mice were mated with mouse mammary tumor virus polyoma middle T-expressing transgenic mice that are prone to develop breast cancer. Paradoxically, these mice had accelerated kinetics of development of breast cancer, suggesting that a ligand activated PPAR
under certain circumstances can actually enhance development of breast cancer (66)
. These experiments suggest that once an initiation event has occurred in breast tissue, increased PPAR
signaling might promote tumor progression in mammary gland tissue.
In summary, the overall role PPAR
plays in breast cancer is somewhat murky. In vitro and in vivo data show that PPAR
ligands can suppress breast cancer growth; and this can be enhanced by retinoids. However, two genetically modified murine models led to contradictory conclusions. Forced overexpression of PPAR
in the breasts of transgenic mice hastens their development of breast tumors; in contrast, loss of one PPAR
allele (PPAR+/-), supposedly with reduced PPAR
expression, increased the risk of breast cancer in these mice after their exposure to a carcinogen compared with similarly treated control mice. Clearly, the role of PPAR
and its ligands in prevention and treatment of breast cancer needs clarification.
Prostate Cancer
Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths among men in the United States, with 40,000 men a year in America dying from this malignancy (67
, 68)
. Although surgical resection and radiotherapy are both potentially curative for localized disease, advanced prostate cancer is associated with a poor prognosis. The blockade of androgen stimulation can lead to either partial or full remission, but the disease reemerges within several years in a poorly differentiated, androgen-independent form.
Prostate cancers often express fairly abundant PPAR
(69
, 70)
. Furthermore, the PPAR
does not appear to be mutated in prostate cancers (15)
. In vitro studies showed that an androgen-independent prostate cancer cell line, PC-3, could be inhibited in its proliferative growth and undergo profound morphological changes when cultured with a ligand of PPAR
(Fig. 1)
. These cells develop prominent enlargement of the cytoplasm with numerous vacuoles. In some of the cells, the vacuoles are finely dispersed, whereas others have huge vacuoles that displace the nuclei, almost resembling adipocytes or signet ring cells. These vacuoles, however, are negative for lipids and thus do not stain with oil red 0. The cytoplasmic lumens often reveal short microvillous processes, suggesting an adenocarcinomatous differentiation. The cell surface also has short microvillous processes.
|
Individuals with prostate cancer have received troglitazone as part of several clinical trials (15
, 72)
. In the biggest study, 41 patients received 800 mg/day of troglitazone after they had radical prostatectomy with curative intent and subsequently developed a rising serum PSA without demonstrable prostate cancer. These patients, therefore, had a recurrence with a low tumor burden. They received TZD for 1820 weeks, and the investigators believed that the speed of rise of the serum PSA for many of these individuals diminished while on treatment. However, the number of measurements of PSA before beginning troglitazone was few, complicating the calculation of the rate of rise of the serum PSA while on therapy as compared with before beginning of therapy. Furthermore, while receiving troglitazone, only 1 of 41 patients had a 50% decrease in his serum PSA, and an additional 7 of 41 patients had less than a 50% decrease in their serum PSA levels. Of those 7 individuals, 3 had androgen-dependent and 4 had androgen-independent prostate cancer. We also treated an individual who began having a rising serum PSA
21/2 years after receiving a radical prostectomy (Fig. 2)
. After beginning troglitazone, the PSA stabilized for 11/2 years; at which time, the individual discontinued the TZD because of concerns about potential liver toxicity from the TZD. Thus, although the results are not dramatic, ligands of PPAR
do appear to have moderate antiprostate cancer activity even against androgen-independent tumors, and because of the low toxicity of most TZDs, additional studies of these agents are probably warranted.
|
(73)
, and PPAR
ligands can induce acute myelomonocytic leukemic cells (THP1) to differentiate toward macrophages with an increased expression of the CD36 scavenger receptors, as well as other surface markers associated with differentiation including CD11b, CD14, and CD18 (73)
. Furthermore, other studies have shown that PPAR
ligands can inhibit the clonal proliferation of the U937 myeloid monocytic leukemic cells, and a PPAR
ligand plus 9-cis-retinoic acid was capable of synergistically inhibiting the clonal proliferation of HL-60, U937, and THP1 human myeloid leukemic cell lines. In general, however, the effect of PPAR
ligands on myeloid leukemic growth and differentiation is modest (74)
.
Is PPAR
a Tumor Suppressor Gene?
Conflicting data garnered in different model systems leaves open the question of whether PPAR
is a tumor suppressor gene (Table 4)
. Ligands of PPAR
can inhibit proliferation and induce differentiation and apoptosis of a wide-range of neoplastic cells, suggesting that PPAR
is a tumor suppressor gene. Indirect evidence is consistent with this premise. Many follicular thyroid carcinomas have the chromosomal fusion of the transcription factors PPAR
and PAX-8 (70)
. In vitro studies suggest that the PAX-8/PPAR
fusion protein can act in a dominant negative fashion inhibiting the activity of the normal PPAR
allele (70)
. Thus, this indirect evidence would suggest that inhibition of function of the wild-type PPAR
is associated with the development of thyroid cancer. Also, PPAR
heterozygous knockout mice (PPAR
+/-) have an increased susceptibility to develop colon, mammary, and ovarian tumors, as well as skin papillomas after administration of a carcinogen (65)
. In addition, mutations of PPAR
have been reported in primary colorectal carcinomas (75)
.
|
is not a tumor suppressor gene, including experiments with Mim mice fed a TZD, as well as transgenic mice who overexpressed PPAR
. These models suggest that PPAR
can act in a cancer-permissive fashion. Also, mice engineered to be PPAR
-/- in a variety of organ systems did not have an increased incidence of cancer in these tissues (76)
. In addition, an extensive study of
400 clinical samples and cell lines from various human cancers did not detect PPAR
mutations (77)
. Furthermore, families having one of several different germ-line mutations of PPAR
have been identified. These individuals often have abnormalities of either fat metabolism or glucose homeostasis, but thus far, they have not been reported to have an increased proclivity to develop cancers (78, 79, 80, 81)
.
In summary, the picture is unclear. Several in vitro and in vivo model systems suggest that PPAR
may behave as a tumor suppressor gene. In contrast, a couple of murine models are consistent with an activated PPAR
-enhancing tumor formation. Clearly, a better understanding of the mechanism of action of activated PPAR
is required. Adding to this complexity, a number of activities mediated by PPAR
ligands may not require PPAR
, as discussed in the next section.
Some of the Actions of PPAR
Ligands Can Occur Independent of PPAR
Several pieces of indirect and direct evidence suggest that select anticancer activity of PPAR
ligands could occur independently of PPAR
(Table 5)
. Indirect evidence includes several studies that found that selective TZDs, including troglitazone but not pioglitazone or rosiglitazone, could inhibit cholesterol biosynthesis or affect cholesterol efflux from cells (82
, 83)
. This selective response by some but not other PPAR
ligands suggests that the inhibition may not be mediated through PPAR
. Additional indirect evidence follows from the observation that pharmacological concentrations (10-65 x 10-5 M) of the PPAR
ligands are required to produce an anticancer activity or inhibit cytokines. In contrast, modulation of lipid-related genes and induction of differentiation of preadipocytes to adipocytes occurs at several logs lower concentrations, closer to the Kd of PPAR
.
|
(PPAR
-/-). In the first study, these cells were induced to differentiate down the macrophage pathway (85)
. Exposure of normal, activated macrophages to either PGJ2 or TZDs decreased their release of inflammatory cytokines such as TNF, IL-1 (IL-1ß), IL-6, inducible nitric oxide synthase, and COX-2 (23
, 26
, 86)
. Surprisingly, exposure of the PPAR
-/- macrophages to either PGJ2 or TZDs also lowered their production of these anti-inflammatory molecules (85)
. In the second series of experiments, TZD inhibited proliferation, DNA synthesis, and caused a G1 cell cycle arrest of embryonic stem cells from both PPAR
-/- and PPAR
+/+ mice (87)
. Likewise, TZDs inhibited both the expression of cyclin D1 and the growth of PPAR
-/- embryonic stem cell tumors growing in syngeneic mice (88)
.
How PPAR
ligands can act independent of PPAR
is under active study. Several hypotheses have been put forth. One group of investigators found that TZDs depleted calcium stores in PPAR-/- ES cells leading to activation of protein kinase R that phosphorylated the
subunit of the eukaryotic initiation factor 2, causing its inactivation (87)
. Many cell cycle regulatory proteins as well as oncogenes contain highly structured GC rich 5' untranslated regions, which can make them very dependent on the activity of the translation initiation factors such as eukaryotic initiation factor 2
, and their inhibition by TZDs could explain the anticancer effects of these compounds. Several other investigations noted that the PPAR
ligand, 15-deoxy-
12,14-prostaglandin J2 potently inhibited the NF-
B pathway and this could occur in the absence of PPAR
-/- in the target cells (88
, 89)
. This PPAR
-independent inhibition may occur by covalent modifications of key cysteines in the inhibitor of nuclear factor
B kinase and the DNA binding domains of NF-
B subunits, preventing them from binding and transactivating cytokine- and growth-related genes.
In summary, PPAR
ligands do have antiproliferative, prodifferentiation, and proapoptotic effects on cancer cells. In combination with retinoids, these activities are enhanced. Although this class of nuclear hormone receptor ligands are unlikely to have a primary role in cancer therapy, their very low toxicity makes them inviting candidates for use in the adjuvant setting in combination with other drugs and for chemoprevention of selected cancers. At this time, anticancer efficacy of PPAR
ligands is being examined in liposarcomas (Dr. George Demetri, Boston, MA) and prostate cancer (Dr. Eric Small, San Francisco, CA). Prostate cancer studies are also planned at the Center for Cancer Research at the National Cancer Institute (Joseph A. Tangrea, Rockville, MD). A Phase IIa trial of the PPAR
agonist, pioglitazone, in oral leukoplakia is also being carried out at the National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention. A breast cancer study is to be initiated shortly by Charite (Berlin, Germany).
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 This review is sponsored, in part, by NIH grants. H. P. K. is a member of the Jonsson Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, and has the endowed Mark Goodson Chair in Oncology Research at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Hematology/Oncology Division, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, BM1-109, Los Angeles, CA 90048. Phone: (310) 423-4609; Fax: (310) 423-3030. ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: PPAR
, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
; NHR, nuclear hormone receptor; RXR, retinoid X receptor; TZD, thiazolidinedione; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; IL, interleukin; NF-
B, nuclear factor
B; APC, adenomatous polyposis coli; TCF, T-cell factor; COX-2, cyclooxygenase 2; PSA, prostate-specific antigen. ![]()
Received 5/ 2/02; revised 8/12/02; accepted 8/21/02.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(PPAR
). J. Biol. Chem., 270: 12953-12956, 1995.
with transcriptional coactivators. J. Biol. Chem., 275: 33201-33204, 2000.
and retinoid X receptor in recruiting nuclear receptor coactivators. Mol. Cell. Biol., 20: 8008-8017, 2000.
. Gastroenterology, 115: 1283-1285, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
gene expression by nutrition and obesity in rodents. J. Clin. Investig., 97: 2553-2561, 1996.[Medline]
gene. J. Biol. Chem., 272: 18779-18789, 1997.
is aberrantly expressed in colonic cancers. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 19: 49-53, 1998.
gene expression is elevated in skeletal muscle of obese and type II diabetic subjects. Diabetes, 46: 1230-1234, 1997.[Abstract]
. Mol. Cell, 1: 465-470, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
(troglitazone) has potent antitumor effects against human prostate cancer both in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Res., 58: 3344-3352, 1998.
. Mol. Endocrinol., 14: 1550-1556, 2000.
2, a lipid-activated transcription factor. Cell, 79: 1147-1156, 1994.[CrossRef][Medline]
2: tissue-specific regulator of an adipocyte enhancer. Genes Dev., 8: 1224-1234, 1994.
and PPAR
activators direct a distinct tissue-specific transcriptional response via a PPRE in the lipoprotein lipase gene. EMBO J., 15: 5336-5348, 1996.[Medline]
dependent and independent effects on macrophage-gene expression in lipid metabolism. Nat. Med., 1: 48-52,
agonists inhibit production of monocyte Inflammatory cytokines. Nature (Lond.), 391: 82-86, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
-dependent repression of the inducible nitric oxide synthase gene. Mol. Cell. Biol., 20: 4699-4707, 2000.
activators inhibit IFN-
-induced expression of the T-cell active CXC chemokines IP10, Mig, and I-TAC in human endothelial cells. J. Immunol., 164: 6503-6508, 2000.
is a negative regulator of macrophage activation. Nature (Lond.), 391: 79-82, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
(PPAR
) mutant is a constitutive repressor and inhibits PPAR
-mediated adipogenesis. J. Biol. Chem., 275: 5754-5759, 2000.
and the retinoid X receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94: 237-241, 1997.
ligand troglitazone in patients with liposarcoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96: 3951-3956, 1999.
ß and cell-cycle regulation: the cyclin connection. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev., 12: 73-90, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]
ß kinase (IKK) and NF-
ß: key elements of proinflammatory signaling. Semin. Immunol., 12: 85-98, 2000.[CrossRef][Medline]
in colorectal cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem., 276: 29681-29687, 2001.
in humans: no alteration in adipose tissue of obese and NIDDM patients. Diabetes, 46: 1319-1327, 1997.[Abstract]
and
. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94: 4318-4323, 1997.
. Nat. Med., 4: 1046-1052, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
as a tumor suppressor gene in colon carcinogenesis. Keystone Symposia: the PPARs: a transcription odyssey (Abstract). 73, 2001.
enhance colon polyp formation. Nat. Med., 4: 1058-1061, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
promotes the development of colon tumors in C57BL/6J-APCMin/mice. Nat. Med., 4: 1053-1057, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
in colorectal cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97: 13275-13280, 2000.
is a APC-regulated target of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Cell, 99: 335-345, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
. Genes Dev., 13: 1561-1574, 1999.
and
. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94: 4312-4317, 1997.
716 knock-out mice by inhibition of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2). Cell, 87: 803-809, 1996.[CrossRef][Medline]
(PPAR-
), GW7845, inhibits rat mammary carcinogenesis. Cancer Res., 59: 5671-5673, 1999.
(PPAR
), retinoids and prevention of preneoplastic mammary lesions. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. (Bethesda), 92: 418-423, 2000.
. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 99: 13771-13776, 2002.
enhance color polyp formation. Nat. Med. 4: 10581061, 1998.
in human prostate cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97: 10990-10995, 2000.
1 Fusion in oncogene human thyroid carcinoma. Science (Wash. DC), 289: 1357-1360, 2000.
(Troglitazone) has potent antitumor effect against human prostate cancer both in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Res., 58: 3370-3375, 1998.
promotes monocyte/macrophage differentiation and uptake of oxidized LDL. Cell, 93: 241-252, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
, and retinoids. Int. J. Oncol., 15: 1027-1093, 1999.[Medline]
associated with human colon cancer. Mol. Cell, 3: 799-804, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
) does not affect mammary development and propensity for tumor formation but leads to reduce fertility. J. Biol. Chem., 277: 17830-17835, 20002.
(PPAR
) gene in human malignancies. Cancer Res., 61: 5307-5310, 2001.
associated with severe insulin resistance, diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Nature (Lond.), 402: 880-884, 1999.[Medline]
gene are associated with severe overweight among obese women. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 84: 3708-3712, 1999.
2 (PPAR-
2): divergent modulating effects on body mass index in obese and lean Caucasian men. Diabetologia, 42: 892-895, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
2 is not associated with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes, 48: 1466-1468, 1999.[Abstract]
. Diabetes, 48: 254-260, 1999.[Abstract]
. Eur. J. Pharmacol., 436: 7-13, 2002.[CrossRef][Medline]
dependent and independent effects on macrophage-gene expression in lipid metabolism and inflammation. Nat. Med., 7: 48-52, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]
in monocytes: less pain and gain?. Cell, 93: 153-155, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
and mediated by inhibition of translation initiation. Cancer Res., 61: 6213-6218, 2001.
B kinase. Nature (Lond.), 403: 103-106, 2000.[CrossRef][Medline]
(12,14)-prostaglandin J2 inhibits multiple steps in the NF-
B signaling pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97: 4844 2000.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Are, L. Aronsson, S. Wang, G. Greicius, Y. K. Lee, J.-A. Gustafsson, S. Pettersson, and V. Arulampalam Enterococcus faecalis from newborn babies regulate endogenous PPAR{gamma} activity and IL-10 levels in colonic epithelial cells PNAS, February 12, 2008; 105(6): 1943 - 1948. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.-H. Nam, S. Ramachandran, D.-K. Song, K.-Y. Kwon, D.-S. Jeon, S.-J. Shin, S.-H. Kwon, S.-D. Cha, I. Bae, and C.-H. Cho Growth inhibition and apoptosis induced in human leiomyoma cells by treatment with the PPAR gamma ligand ciglitizone Mol. Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2007; 13(11): 829 - 836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Wei, L.-F. Lin, C.-C. Yang, Y.-C. Wang, G.-D. Chang, H. Chen, and C.-S. Chen Thiazolidinediones Modulate the Expression of beta-Catenin and Other Cell-Cycle Regulatory Proteins by Targeting the F-Box Proteins of Skp1-Cul1-F-box Protein E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Independently of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma} Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2007; 72(3): 725 - 733. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||