Clinical Cancer Research Meeting Calendar Advances in Breast Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karp, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Colevas, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karp, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Colevas, A. D.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 9, 307-315, January 2003
© 2003 American Association for Cancer Research

Experimental Therapeutics, Preclinical Pharmacology

Timed Sequential Therapy of Acute Leukemia with Flavopiridol

In Vitro Model for a Phase I Clinical Trial1

Judith E. Karp2, Douglas D. Ross, Weidong Yang, Michael L. Tidwell, Yuetong Wei, Jacqueline Greer, Dean L. Mann, Takeo Nakanishi, John J. Wright and A. Dmitri Colevas

University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland 21201 [J. E. K., D. D. R., W. Y., M. L. T., Y. W., J. G., D. L. M., T. N.]; Baltimore Veterans Administration Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland [D. D. R.]; and Investigational Drug Branch, Clinical Trials Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute [J. J. W., A. D. C.], Bethesda, Maryland


   ABSTRACT
Top
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Purpose: The survival of adults with acute leukemias remains unsatisfactory and requires new treatment approaches. Flavopiridol modulates cell cycle progression, inhibits transcription, and induces apoptosis. We designed an in vitro model of timed sequential therapy for acute leukemia to determine whether flavopiridol can: (a) trigger apoptosis in fresh acute leukemia; and (b) recruit surviving leukemic cells to a proliferative state, thereby priming such cells for the S-phase-related cytotoxicity of 1-ß-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine (ara-C).

Experimental Design: Bone marrow cells from 20 adults with relapsed and refractory acute leukemias were enriched for blasts by Ficoll Hypaque sedimentation. Blasts were cultured on day 0 in flavopiridol 250 nM for 24 h, removed from flavopiridol for 24 h, and then cultured in ara-C 1 µM for an additional 72 h (F250A1). Apoptosis and cell cycle phase distribution were estimated from cells stained with propidium iodide. Cell survival was determined after the 72 h ara-C exposure by double cytofluorescence assay with fluorescein diacetate and propidium iodide.

Results: Flavopiridol induced a 4.3-fold increase in apoptosis in human leukemia samples within the first 24 h of culture. Subsequent removal of flavopiridol led to a 1.7-fold increase in the proportion of cells in S phase by day 2. Mean survival in F250A1 cultures after 72 h exposure to ara-C was 35.6% compared with flavopiridol alone (F250A0, 56.1%; P = 0.0003) and ara-C alone (F0A1, 65.2%; P < 0.00001).

Conclusions: Flavopiridol induces apoptosis in marrow blasts from patients with refractory acute leukemias. Furthermore, flavopiridol pretreatment increases the proapoptotic and cytotoxic effects of ara-C. The advantage of sequential FP250A1 over either agent alone is seen for both acute myelogenous leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. These findings support a clinical trial of timed sequential therapy where flavopiridol is given for cytoreduction and subsequent priming of remaining leukemic cells for enhanced cycle-dependent drug cytotoxicity.


   INTRODUCTION
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Adult acute leukemias remain a formidable therapeutic challenge. Only ~70% of adults with newly diagnosed AML3 achieve CR after cytotoxic induction chemotherapy. Although these CRs may be prolonged in 35–40% of younger adults (ages <60 years; Refs. 1, 2, 3 ), the remainder relapse and die. Certain subgroups, including older adults (1 , 4, 5, 6) , patients with AML linked to environmental or occupational exposures (including therapy-induced AML; reviewed in Ref. 7 ) and patients with previous MDS or other antecedent hematological disorders (5 , 7) have extremely poor outcomes, with CR rates <=40%, CR durations <12 months, and cure rates <10–15% (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) . The overall outlook for adult ALL is similar (8, 9, 10, 11) , with a particularly poor prognosis in Philadelphia chromosome disease (12 , 13) . Thus, new approaches are needed to improve the outcome for adults with refractory leukemias.

One strategy to augment the cytotoxicity of cycle-dependent antileukemic agents is TST (14 , 15) . TST is based on the findings that the initial cytoreductive drug induces the remaining malignant cell cohort to enter a proliferative state at a predictable time after drug administration (14, 15, 16) . At least hypothetically, this recruited residual tumor would be expected to exhibit an increased sensitivity to drugs administered at the time of predicted proliferation (15 , 16) . The heightened sensitivity of this proliferative cohort to cycle-dependent drugs, in particular the classical antileukemic nucleoside analogue ara-C, has been demonstrated in in vitro models designed to mimic the in vivo situation (16) and in vivo where the clinical response to ara-C-based TST relates to a linkage between AML cell growth and intracellular ara-C pharmacology (17) . Indeed, TST has met with prolongation of disease-free survival in certain groups of adults and children with AML (18, 19, 20, 21, 22) .

Nonetheless, whereas TST regimens increase the DFS and cure rate of some patients with AML, there is still a significant proportion of patients for whom TST alone is not curative. These refractory and relapsed leukemias are characterized by dysregulation of proliferation, differentiation, and the balance between cell survival and death, with the balance shifted toward prolonged survival. Such survival likely plays a major role in the resistance to cytotoxic agents exhibited by these refractory leukemias and is likely related to abrogation of programmed cell death (apoptosis) pathways that are activated by key antileukemic drugs.

Activation of apoptosis pathways is a convergence point for many cytotoxic agents, independent of specific drug mechanism. In this regard, the ability to trigger apoptosis independent of cell cycle status might augment overall cytotoxicity and improve clinical results. One such drug is ara-C, a classical cycle-dependent agent with significant activity against both AML and ALL. The drug is a pyrimidine analogue that must be phosphorylated intracellularly to an active triphosphate form (ara-CTP) that, in turn, is incorporated into DNA and leads to a net inhibition of DNA synthesis with eventual cytotoxicity (23) . The incorporation of ara-CTP into DNA exerts direct DNA damage and at the same time impedes the enzymatic repair of that damage. These insults culminate in at least two types of cytotoxic activities: (a) S-phase arrest with abrogation of DNA replication and (b) apoptosis (23 , 24) . In fact, induction of apoptosis in response to DNA strand breakage may at least, in part, explain the cytotoxic activity of ara-C against noncycling cells in addition to the cycling cell population.

Given the pivotal role of apoptosis in drug-induced cytotoxicity, it is important to identify agents that could induce directly and/or overcome resistance to the induction of apoptosis in a clinically meaningful fashion. Flavopiridol (L86–8275), a synthetic flavone derivative that was initially isolated from the stem bark of the Indian tree Dysoxylum binectariferum (25 , 26) , is a potent growth inhibitor of diverse human tumor cell lines (26) , including the induction of apoptosis in hematopoietic cell lines derived from B-cell lymphomas (SUDHL4 and 6), T cell lymphomas (Jurkat, MOLT4), and AML (HL60; Refs. 26, 27, 28, 29 ). Recent studies in the U937 monoblastic leukemia cell line indicate that flavopiridol induces apoptosis by triggering mitochondrial release of cytochrome c in a fashion that is independent of procaspase-8 cleavage and activation (30) .

Mechanistically, flavopiridol inhibits the activities of multiple serine-threonine CDKs by at least two mechanisms: (a) noncell cycle-dependent binding to the ATP-binding site in the CDK molecules (31) ; and (b) cell cycle-dependent interference with CDK phosphorylation (32, 33, 34) . In turn, the blockade of CDK function leads to cell cycle arrest at both the G1-S and G2-M checkpoints. The cell cycle arrest induced by flavopiridol relates not only to inhibition of CDKs 1,2,4,6, and 7 but also to direct transcriptional repression of cyclin D1 with depletion of cyclin D1 levels. CDK inhibition occurs at flavopiridol concentrations of 40–200 nM, whereas cyclin D1 depletion requires slightly higher drug doses (100–300 nM; Ref. 35 ). Additionally, low concentrations of flavopiridol (50–100 nM) decrease the production of VEGF in response to a hypoxic stimulus, at least in part by decreasing the stability of VEGF mRNA (36) . VEGF is a growth and survival factor for diverse tumor cell types, including certain acute leukemias (37 , 38) , and it is conceivable that flavopiridol might exert some part of its growth inhibition through this mechanism.

Recent studies demonstrate that flavopiridol’s cytotoxic effects also relate to the drug’s ability to interrupt transcription by multiple mechanisms (reviewed in Ref. 39 ). One such mechanism relates to flavopiridol’s ability to bind to and inactivate the CDK9/cyclin T1 (a noncycling cyclin that binds the antiretroviral Tat protein) complex known as P-TEFb (39 , 40) . P-TEFb facilitates transcription elongation by phosphorylating the COOH-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase II complex (41) . By targeting P-TEFb, flavopiridol impedes transcriptional elongation and thereby exerts a net blockade of RNA polymerase II action (41 , 42) . Another mechanism by which flavopiridol may inhibit transcription is by binding to double-stranded DNA (43) . This binding, in turn, may disrupt the interaction between DNA and transcription factors, including the binding of the transcription factor STAT3 to DNA. Interestingly, D cyclins are downstream targets of STAT3 (35) , and it is reasonable to speculate that the inhibition of cyclin D expression by flavopiridol results from the drug interfering with STAT3-mediated transcription. Mcl-1 is an antiapoptotic protein of the Bcl-2 family whose expression is related to chemoresistance in AML, at least in the setting of leukemia relapse (44) . Like D cyclins, Mcl-1 is a transcriptional target of STAT3 (45) , and its expression is down-regulated with concomitant induction of apoptosis in myeloma cell lines and in fresh CD138+ cells from myeloma patients exposed to flavopiridol in vitro (46) . Moreover, disruption of STAT3 function and resultant down-regulation of Mcl-1 has been observed in AML blasts obtained from patients receiving flavopiridol as part of a National Cancer Institute- and Institutional Review Board-approved clinical trial (47 , 48) .

Thus, transcriptional inhibition via multiple pathways is likely to be a central mechanistic theme by which flavopiridol exerts its antitumor activities (39) . This hypothesis is substantiated by data generated in the human lung cancer cell line A549, suggesting that flavopiridol is active against noncycling as well as cycling cells and that such activity is cytotoxic as well as cytostatic (27) . Furthermore, flavopiridol-induced cytotoxicity is followed by recruitment into cycle and synchronization of residual A549 cells surviving a 24-h drug exposure (49) . An increase in the proportion of tumor cells entering S phase is observed 48–72-h postflavopiridol initiation and persists for a minimum of 3–4 days thereafter (after which point cultures reached confluence and were not evaluable for ongoing growth). Treatment with ara-C at the time when flavopiridol-treated residual tumor cells are actively proliferating leads to synergistic growth inhibition and cytotoxicity in vitro (49) . This outcome mimics the recruitment of residual leukemic cells observed after initial cytoreductive therapy, thus simulating the principles of TST.

In sum, flavopiridol exhibits some novel mechanisms of action that may not be cross-resistant with the cytotoxic antileukemic agents currently in use and might potentiate the net antileukemic activity of such agents. On the basis of the above-noted studies, we designed an in vitro model of TST to test the hypotheses that: 1) flavopiridol can induce apoptosis and cytotoxicity in fresh human leukemia bone marrow cells; and 2) flavopiridol can recruit the surviving leukemic cells into a proliferative state and thus "prime" such cells for the S-phase-related cytotoxicity of ara-C. Our in vitro model was developed with the in vivo situation in mind, using clinically achievable doses of flavopiridol (26 , 50) and ara-C (17 , 51) to facilitate translation of our findings to the clinical setting. The results, in turn, serve as a springboard for designing a clinical trial of flavopiridol-based TST in refractory leukemias.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Human Acute Leukemia Bone Marrow Cultures.
Bone marrow cells were obtained from 20 adults with relapsed and refractory acute leukemia (17 AML and 3 ALL) by routine needle aspiration. Six patients had newly diagnosed AML with poor risk features (3 treatment-related AML or MDS/AML and 3 MDS/AML with complex cytogenetics). Five patients had relapsed leukemia (3 AML and 2 ALL) and 9 had refractory disease (8 AML and 1 ALL). All 14 patients with relapsed or refractory leukemia had received ara-C before the study. No patient received flavopiridol before in vitro study. All patients provided informed consent for marrow aspiration and in vitro studies according to respective University of Maryland, Baltimore Institutional Review Board guidelines before marrow aspiration. Patient and disease characteristics are presented in Table 1Citation .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1 Patient characteristics

 
Cell Cultures.
HL-60 cells were cultured at an initial cell concentration of 5 x 105 cells/ml in the presence of 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated FCS (Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY) and RPMI 1640 containing L-glutamine (2 mM), penicillin (50 IU/ml), and streptomycin (50 µg/ml). Leukemic blast populations from 20 patients were enriched from heparinized marrow aspirates by Ficoll Hypaque gradient sedimentation. The percentage of blasts in each marrow population was >=50% before sedimentation and increased to >=80% after sedimentation. Blast-enriched populations were cultured at a final concentration of ~5 x 105 cells/ml (range, 2.8–6.7 x 105) with 15% autologous serum (v/v) and maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Cell counts in control cultures, as measured by Coulter counting, did not change significantly during the first 2 days of culture (mean {Delta} day 2/day 0 = 0.95; range, 0.6–2.1). Cell counts in day 5 control cultures exhibited modest count decreases relative to day 2 (mean {Delta} day 5/day 2 = 0.8; range, 0.3–1.3).

Flavopiridol.
Flavopiridol was kindly provided by the Developmental Therapeutics Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute and Aventis Pharmaceuticals. Stock solutions of flavopiridol (1,000-fold concentrated) were prepared in DMSO and stored at -20°C until use.

In Vitro Model of TST.
For each of the 20 marrow populations, blast cell cultures were initiated on day 0 in the presence of flavopiridol 250 nM (F250) for 24 h (Day 1), removed from flavopiridol for 24 h (day 2), and then cultured in ara-C 1 µM (A1) for an additional 72 h (F250A1, Fig. 1Citation ). Parallel controls consisted of cultured cells that: (a) did not receive either flavopiridiol or ara-C (F0A0); (b) received flavopiridol day 0 but did not receive ara-C on day 2 (F250A0); and (c) did not receive flavopiridol on day 0 but received ara-C on Day 2 (F0A1).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 1. In vitro model of TST. F0A0, cell cultures without any drug exposure. F0A1, drug-free medium followed on day 2 by ara-C (1 µM) for 72-h exposure (day 5). F250A0, flavopiridol (250 nM) for 24 h beginning day 0, followed by flavopiridol removal on day 1 and continuation of culture through day 5. FP250A1, flavopiridol (250 nM) for 24 h beginning day 0 followed by flavopiridol removal day 1, followed by 72-h exposure to ara-C (1 µM) beginning day 2 and ending day 5.

 
Measurements of Apoptosis and Cell Cycle Phase Distribution.
Apoptosis and cell cycle phase distribution were estimated on days 1 and 2 (when sufficient sample permitted), as indicated in Fig. 1Citation , from cell nuclei stained with (50 µg/ml) in hypotonic citrate buffer (52) . Apoptosis and cell cycle phase distribution were estimated from the flow cytometric data using the Modfit LT 3.0 flow cytometry modeling program (Verity Software House, Topsham, ME).

Measurement of Cell Survival.
The number of viable cells in culture was determined at the end of the 72 h ara-C (or control) exposure on day 5 (see Fig. 1Citation ) by double cytofluorescence assay, which involves simultaneous staining of cells with FDA and PI under isotonic conditions, as described previously (53) .


   RESULTS
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Flavopiridol Exerts Direct Cytotoxicity against HL-60 Leukemia Cells.
As a prelude to our studies with fresh human marrow leukemia populations, we examined the effects of flavopiridol on the cells from the human-derived AML cell line HL-60, using the flow cytometric FDA/PI assay (53) . Fig. 2Citation demonstrates that graded doses of flavopiridol were capable of altering cell growth and survival patterns of HL-60 cells in a dose-dependent fashion with an LC50 of ~500–600 nM for HL-60 cells after 72 h of exposure. These data substantiate the original findings of Bible and Kaufmann (27) using another method for measuring cytotoxicity and validate the use of FDA/PI (53) for our studies in fresh human leukemia marrow cells. Moreover, apoptosis could be detected within the first 24 h with flavopiridol doses as low as 250 nM. On the basis of these findings, we selected the dose of 250 nM for additional studies in fresh acute leukemia cell populations to allow us to detect cytotoxic effects of flavopiridol while at the same time we were able to observe the behavior of cells that would survive the flavopiridol exposure. Additionally, this dose corresponds to drug levels that are readily achievable in vivo (35) .



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 2. Dose response of HL-60 cells exposed to graded doses of flavopiridol for 72 h. Cell survival was assessed by the flow cytometric FDA/PI assay (53) . Vertical bars represent coefficient of variation.

 
Flavopiridol Causes Apoptosis in Fresh Human Leukemia Marrow Cells by Day 1.
As depicted in Table 2Citation and Fig. 3Citation , flavopiridol induced a >=20% (1.2-fold) increase in apoptosis in 14 (70%) of the 20 human leukemia samples within the first 24 h of culture as determined by hypotonic PI nuclear staining. Mean increase in the presence of flavopiridol relative to drug-free culture was 4.3-fold (median, 1.7; range, 0.6–27). Flavopiridol caused a >=1.5-fold increase in apoptosis relative to control populations in 11 (55%) of patients, with >=3-fold increase detected in 6 (30%). Only 5 (25%) leukemic populations failed to exhibit any increase in apoptosis during initial flavopiridol exposure. There was no clear relationship between the response to flavopiridol and prior exposure to ara-C and/or known ara-C resistance. This apoptosis led to eventual cytotoxicity on day 5, where mean survival for flavopiridol-exposed cells was 56 ± 15% (median, 52%; range, 5–124%) of that detected in nonexposed control cells, with 12 (60%) of the 20 marrow populations exhibiting cell survival <40% of control (discussed in TST Model section in conjunction with Table 3Citation and Fig. 4Citation , below).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 2 Flavopiridol-induced apoptosis

 


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 3. Percentage of cells undergoing apoptosis from 20 leukemic marrow blast populations during the first 24 h of culture, comparing flavopiridol 250 nM with control (no drug). Horizontal bars represent median values.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 3 Leukemic blast cell survival on day 5 of culture

 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 4. In vitro model of TST. Overall cytotoxicity expressed as percentage of cell survival in the presence of one or both agents (flavopiridol and ara-C) relative to control cultures without any drug exposure. ara-C alone (F0A1), control medium followed on day 2 by ara-C (1 µM) for 72-h exposure (day 5). Flavopiridol alone (F250A0), flavopiridol 250 nM for 24 h beginning day 0, followed by flavopiridol removal on day 1 and continuation of culture through day 5. Flavopiridol followed by ara-C, FP250A1, flavopiridol 250 nM for 24 h beginning day 0 followed by flavopiridol removal day 1 followed by 72-h exposure to ara-C (1 µM) beginning day 2 and ending day 5. Vertical bars represent coefficient of variation. **, P = 0.0003 for F250A1 versus flavopiridol alone; P < 0.00001 for F250A1 versus ara-C alone (paired t test).

 
Flavopiridol Increases the Proportion of Leukemic Marrow Cells in S Phase on Day 2.
Cell cycle determinations on Day 2 before ara-C exposure demonstrated an increase in S phase for cells initially cultured in flavopiridol followed by 24 h in flavopiridol-free medium in 8 (53%) of the 15 leukemia populations analyzed for this parameter (Fig. 5a)Citation . Removal from flavopiridol resulted in a mean 1.7-fold increase in the percentage of cells in S phase on day 2 (median, 1.2; range, 0.2–7.0), with 7 (47%) of the marrow blast populations evincing increases of >=1.5-fold on day 2 after flavopiridol removal (Table 4)Citation . Increases in S phase were detected in 6 (86%) of 7 AML marrow populations, with a mean 2.8-fold increase for all AMLs (median, 2.1; range, 0.2–7.0) but only 1 of 5 MDS/AML (mean, 0.9; range, 0.4–1.2) and 1 of 3 ALL (mean, 0.7; range, 0.5–1.5) populations (6 of 7 versus 2 of 8, {chi}2 = 5.53; P = 0.019). In contrast, increases in S phase were not detected in the majority of parallel drug-free control cultures (mean, 0.9; median, 0.8; range, <0.01–3.2-fold). The proportion of cells in S phase decreased by at least 20% (0.8-fold) in eight marrows, with six marrows exhibiting decreases of 40–>95% (0.6–<0.05-fold), and only four marrows demonstrating increases in S-phase percentage (1.2–3.2-fold). Interestingly, these four marrows were from AML patients in contrast to no such increases in any of the MDS/AML or ALL marrows (4 of 7 versus 0 of 8, {chi}2 = 6.23; P = 0.013). Nonetheless, the effect of flavopiridol on recruitment of cells into S phase exceeded that seen in control cultures in 5 of 7 AML marrow populations. In addition, Fig. 5bCitation demonstrates that while exposure to flavopiridol does not increase (and may actually decrease) the percentage of cells in S phase on day 1 relative to drug-free control cultures, there is a trend (P = 0.067) toward increases in the S-phase fraction in the flavopiridol-exposed cultures on day 2 just before adding ara-C.



View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 5. a, changes in percentage of cells in S phase in 15 marrow blast populations from day 1 to day 2 for control (no drug) cultures and cells cultured for 24 h in flavopiridol 250 nM followed by drug removal. Horizontal bars represent median values. b, differences in fraction of cells in S phase for 15 marrow blast populations on days 1 and 2, comparing control (no drug) and cells exposed to flavopiridol 250 nM for 24 h. Horizontal bars represent median values.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 4 Flavopiridol-induced change in percentage of cells in S phase

 
TST Model: Flavopiridol Enhances ara-C Cytotoxicity.
The impact of flavopiridol pretreatment on the cytotoxic effects of ara-C on the individual leukemic marrow blast populations was determined by the addition of ara-C (1 µM final concentration) on day 2, 24 h after removal of flavopiridol 250 nM, with measurements conducted on day 5 after 72 h exposure to ara-C (F250A1). The 24-h rest period in vitro was intended to mimic the design of TST, where drug administration is timed to coincide with the expected occurrence of cell regrowth after initial cytoreduction (14, 15, 16) . Furthermore, the dose of ara-C used in vitro is one that is readily achievable in vivo (51) and has been used in previous in vitro studies of TST-based ara-C pharmacology (17) .

As depicted in Table 3Citation and Fig. 4Citation , F250A1 cultures exhibited significant increases in overall cytotoxicity, as measured by FDA/PI, relative to all other culture conditions. Mean survival for the 20 marrow samples given F250A1 cultures was 35.6% (range, 2.4–96%) of cells receiving no drug, which was significantly less than the survival seen with flavopiridol alone (mean, 56.1%; range, 4.6–123.6; P = 0.0003) or ara-C alone (mean, 65.2%; range, 19–106%; P < 0.00001) when analyzed by paired t test. When used as single agents, flavopiridol and ara-C induced equivalent decreases in cell survival. Cytotoxicity with the flavopiridol/ara-C combination was at least 20% greater than the cytotoxicity detected in flavopiridol alone in 13 cases (65%), ara-C alone in 15 cases (75%), or both single drug cultures in 9 cases (45%). Antagonistic effects of F250A1 were uncommon, occurring in only one blast population each relative to F250A0 and F0A1 (Table 3)Citation .


   DISCUSSION
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Our studies demonstrate that flavopiridol exerts direct cytotoxic effects against a significant proportion of primary human acute leukemia marrow blast populations in vitro. This cytotoxicity occurs at a modest dose of drug, namely 250 nM, which is readily achievable in vivo (26) . In response to flavopiridol, more than half (11 of 17) of the AML populations and all 3 of the ALL populations evinced significant increases in apoptosis during the first 24 h of culture, with dramatic increases (>=3-fold) in more than one-third of the leukemias. We chose to measure apoptosis per se only on day 1 of culture because such measurements at later time points could be confounded by death and clearance of the previously apoptotic cell fraction. Interestingly, most of these leukemia populations are at least as sensitive to flavopiridol 250 nM as they are to ara-C 1 µM. This finding may not be so surprising, however, given the refractory nature of these patients and the fact that most of them have received ara-C and have either relapsed despite therapy or failed to respond altogether. The notion that the patients’ blasts are indeed ara-C resistant is substantiated by comparison with HL-60 cells, where the LC50 for ara-C is ~200 nM, one-fifth of the dose that killed ~50% of our fresh leukemia blast populations using the same FDA/PI assay (53) .

From this perspective, 70% of the marrow cell populations examined in this study were obtained from patients with relapsed and refractory leukemias who had received ara-C previously as part of antileukemic induction and/or consolidation regimens and thus, by virtue of having recurrent or persistent leukemia, would be expected to be resistant to the cytotoxic effects of ara-C. The notion that these populations are indeed ara-C resistant is substantiated by finding that ara-C had only a modest impact on overall cell survival, decreasing survival to 65% (median, 69%; range, 19–106%) of that seen in control cultures (Fig. 4Citation , Table 3Citation ). This relative refractoriness to ara-C cytotoxicity was evident for the 6 AML populations that were previously untreated and therefore "ara-C-naïve" (mean, 67%; range, 21–106% of control) as well as for those who had received ara-C previously. Three of the previously untreated patients (patients 2, 14, and 18) had therapy-related AML associated with adverse cytogenetics and 3 (patients 8, 12, and 17) had MDS/AML (2 with complex cytogenetic features; see Table 1Citation ). The apparent in vitro refractoriness to ara-C-induced cell death in these previously untreated patients parallels the known primary clinical refractoriness of this AML subgroup to classical induction chemotherapy approaches, all of which rely heavily on moderate to high doses of ara-C (1, 2, 3, 4 , 14 , 18, 19, 20, 21, 22) .

We tested a sequence of drug administration in vitro that would allow us to detect cytotoxic activity of flavopiridol on acute leukemia cell populations, namely, the use of flavopiridol as an initial single drug, with the intent of extrapolating the resultant data to the design of a clinical trial that would likewise permit direct assessment of flavopiridol’s antileukemic activity in vivo (47 , 48) . The sequence tested here, specifically flavopiridol followed by ara-C, differs from studies where administration of the cdk inhibitor flavopiridol (49) or UCN-01 (53 , 54) appears to exert its greatest antitumor effects when administered after chemotherapeutic agents. These studies were conducted in solid tumor (49) and leukemic (54 , 55) cell lines, and the agents were administered in close temporal proximity (i.e., 6–24 h of initial exposure, followed immediately by the second drug in sequence). In contrast, our studies differ in two potentially important ways. First, we studied fresh leukemia populations, which are inherently heterogeneous in terms of cell growth kinetics and pharmacological determinants. It seems likely that this heterogeneity may account for the relatively modest effects of flavopiridol alone and in timed sequence with ara-C seen in these fresh human leukemias relative to the quantitatively more striking effects seen in studies using cell lines. Second, we designed our sequential approach to allow time for those cells surviving the initial flavopiridol exposure to re-enter and traverse the cell cycle and thereby acquire growth kinetic sensitivity to ara-C (16 , 17 , 49) . However, because we did not examine alternate drug schedules, our data do not preclude the possibility that another sequence of flavopiridol and ara-C might be equally effective in terms of net antileukemic cytotoxicity. Thus, alternate sequences may be worth future exploration in vitro, particularly if an in vivo TST-based clinical trial using the sequence of flavopiridol followed by ara-C does not yield rewarding clinical results in patients with refractory leukemias.

Nonetheless, the sequential administration of flavopiridol followed by ara-C was able to augment net antileukemic cytotoxicity in a substantial majority of these poor-risk leukemias, including all three ALLs (patients 10, 11, and 20). This observation is interesting because we did not detect consistent recruitment into S phase after flavopiridol exposure in these ALL marrows. It is possible that the enhanced ara-C sensitivity of the ALL marrows is, in part, independent of cell growth kinetic changes. Flavopiridol induces apoptosis in diverse lymphoproliferative malignancy cell lines of either B or T origin (28 , 29) and in primary malignant cells from chronic lymphocytic leukemia (45 , 55) and multiple myeloma (46) patients. Provocatively, the apoptosis may be independent of changes in Bcl-2 and/or functional p53 expression (29 , 45 , 56) . Most recently, a new Burkitt’s lymphoma cell line (GA-10) established from peripheral blood cells from a chemorefractory patient and characterized by absence of EBV and presence of biallelic p53 mutations has been found to exhibit striking sensitivity to flavopiridol, with induction of apoptosis at doses as low as 100 nM (57) . Again, the apoptosis seen in GA-10 is associated with activation of caspase-3 but does not rely on p53 function (57) . Taken together, the in vitro findings in malignant lymphoid cell lines, primary chronic B-cell malignancies (chronic lymphocytic leukemia and myeloma), and our small experience with primary ALL samples suggest that flavopiridol might be effective for lymphoid malignancies, including ALLs and should be tested clinically in those settings.

In conclusion, our studies demonstrate that flavopiridol can induce apoptotic cell death in leukemic marrow blast cell populations obtained from patients with acute leukemias that would be expected to be resistant to ara-C and other chemotherapeutic agents. Furthermore, in an in vitro model designed to mimic in vivo TST, flavopiridol-treated blast cultures exhibit increased sensitivity to the proapoptotic and cytotoxic effects of ara-C. Although we cannot exclude the possibility that flavopiridol and ara-C are acting in an independent fashion, we observed an apparent advantage of sequential FP250A1 over either agent given singly for newly diagnosed and previously treated refractory leukemias and for both myeloid and lymphoid blast populations. The enhancement of ara-C-based antileukemic activity by flavopiridiol supports the design of a clinical trial of TST in refractory and relapsed acute leukemias where flavopiridol is given for the dual purpose of initial cytoreduction and subsequent priming of the remaining leukemic cell cohort for the purpose of enhancing the response of that cohort to cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Mary Wasti for secretarial expertise and Dr. Scott Kaufmann for helpful insights.


   FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported by National Cancer Institute Cooperative Agreement U01 CA69854 (to J. E. K.), NIH Grants R01 CA77545 (to D. D. R.) and R24 CA82888 (to D. L. M.), VA Merit Award (to D. D. R.), and a grant from Aventis Pharmaceuticals (to J. E. K.). Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Bunting-Blaustein Cancer Research Building, 1650 Orleans St., Room 289, Baltimore, Maryland 21231-1000. Phone: (410) 955-8781; Fax (410) 614-1005; E-mail: jkarp2{at}jhmi.edu Back

3 The abbreviations used are: AML, acute myelogenous leukemia; ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; CR, complete remission; MDS, myelodysplasia; TST, timed sequential therapy; ara-C, 1-ß-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine; CDK, cyclin-dependent kinase; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; STAT3, signal transducers and activators of transcription 3, PI, propidium iodide; FDA, fluorescein diacetate. Back

Received 5/31/02; revised 7/24/02; accepted 8/14/02.


   REFERENCES
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Baudard M., Beauchamp-Nicoud A., Delmer A., Rio B., Blanc C., Zittoun R., Marie J. P. Has the prognosis of adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia improved over years? A single institution experience of 784 consecutive patients over a 16-year period. Leukemia (Baltimore), 13: 1481-1490, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Buchner T., Hiddeman W., Wormann B., Loffler H., Gassmann W., Haferlach T., Fontsch C., Haase D., Schoch C., Hossfield D., Lengfelder E., Aul C., Heyll A., Maschmeyer G., Ludwig W. D., Sauerland M. C., Heinecke A. Double induction strategy for acute myeloid leukemia: the effect of high-dose cytarabine with mitoxantrone instead of standard-dose cytarabine with daunorubicin and 6-thioguanine: a randomized trial by the German AML Cooperative Group. Blood, 93: 4116-4124, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Cassileth P. A., Harrington D. P., Appelbaum F. R., Lazarus H. M., Rowe J. M., Paietta E., Willman C., Hurd D. D., Bennett J. M., Blume K. G., Head D. R., Wiernik P. H. Chemotherapy compared with autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in the management of acute myeloid leukemia in first remission. N. Engl. J. Med., 339: 1649-1656, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Goldstone A. H., Burnett A. K., Wheatley K., Smith A. G., Hutchinson R. M., Clark R. E., the Medical Research Council Adult Leukemia Working Party Attempts to improve outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in older patients: the results of the United Kingdom Medical Research Council AML11 trial. Blood, 98: 1302-1311, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Grimwade D., Walker H., Harrison G., Oliver F., Chatters S., Harrison C. J., Wheatley K., Burnett A. K., Goldstone A. H., the Medical Research Council Adult Leukemia Working Party The predictive value of hierarchical cytogenetic classification in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML): analysis of 1065 patients entered into the United Kingdom Medical Research Council AML11 trial. Blood, 98: 1312-1320, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Hiddemann W., Kern W., Schoch C., Fonatsch C., Heinecke A., Wormann B., Buchner T. Management of acute myeloid leukemia in elderly patients. J. Clin. Oncol., 17: 3569-3576, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Karp J. E., Smith M. A. The molecular pathogenesis of treatment-induced (secondary) leukemias: foundations for treatment and prevention. Semin. Oncol., 24: 103-113, 1997.[Medline]
  8. Hoelzer D., Ludwig W. D., Thiel E., Gassmann W., Loffler H., Fonatsch C., Rieder H., Heil G., Heinze B., Arnold R., Hossfeld D., Buchner T., Koch P., Freund M., Hiddemann W., Maschmeyer G., Heyll A., Aul C., Faak T., Kuse R., Ittel T. H., Gramatzki M., Diedrich H., Kolbe K., Uberla K., et al Improved outcome in adult B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood, 87: 495-508, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Kantarjian H. M., O’Brien S., Smith T. L., Cortes J., Giles F. J., Beran M., Pierce S., Huh Y., Andreeff M., Koller C., Ha C. A., Keating M. J., Murphy S., Freireich E. J. Results of treatment with Hyper-CVAD, a dose-intensive regimen, in adult acute lymphocytic leukemia. J. Clin. Oncol., 18: 547-561, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Petersdorf S. H., Kopecky K. J., Head D. R., Boldt D. H., Balcerzak S. P., Wun T., Roy V., Veith R. W., Appelbaum F. R. Comparison of the L10M consolidation regimen to an alternative regimen including escalating methotrexate/L-asparaginase for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group Study. Leukemia (Baltimore), 15: 208-216, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Thomas X., Danaila C., Le Q. H., Sebban C., Troncy J., Charrin C., Lheritier V., Michallet M., Magaud J. P., Fiere D. Long-term follow-up of patients with newly diagnosed adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a single institution experience of 378 consecutive patients over a 21-year period. Leukemia (Baltimore), 15: 1811-1822, 2001.[Medline]
  12. Faderl S., Kantarjian H. M., Talpaz M., Estrov Z. Clinical significance of cytogenetic abnormalities in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood, 91: 3995-4019, 1998.[Free Full Text]
  13. Wetzler M., Dodge R. K., Mrozek K., Carroll A. J., Tantravahi R., Block A. W., Pattenati M. J., Le Beau M. M., Frankel S. R., Stewart C. C., Szatrowski T. P., Schiffer C. A., Larson R. A., Bloomfield C. D. Prospective karyotype analysis in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: the Cancer and Acute Leukemia Group B experience. Blood, 93: 3983-3993, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Burke P. J., Karp J. E., Braine H. G., Vaughan W. P. Timed sequential therapy of human leukemia based upon the response of leukemic cells to humoral growth factors. Cancer Res., 37: 2138-2146, 1977.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Karp J. E., Burke P. J. Growth response of residual leukemia after initial drug therapy. Cancer Res., 46: 4205-4207, 1986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Karp J. E., Donehower R. C., Enterline J. P., Dole G. B., Fox M. G., Burke P. J. In vivo cell growth and pharmacologic determinants of clinical response in acute myelogenous leukemia. Blood, 73: 24-30, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Karp J. E., Donehower R. C., Dole G. B., Burke P. J. Correlation of drug-perturbed marrow cell growth kinetics and intracellular 1-ß-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine metabolism with clinical response in adult acute myelogenous leukemia. Blood, 69: 1134-1140, 1987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Archimbaud E., Thomas X., Leblond V., Michallet M., Fenaux P., Cardonnier C., Dreyfus F., Troussard X., Jaubert J., Travade P., Troncy J., Assouline D., Fiere D. Timed sequential chemotherapy for previously treated patients with acute myeloid leukemia: long-term follow-up of the etoposide, mitoxantrone, and cytarabine-86 trial. J. Clin. Oncol., 13: 11-18, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Geller R. B., Burke P. J., Karp J. E., Humphrey R. L., Braine H. G., Tucker R. W., Fox M. G., Zahurak M., Morrell L., Hall K. L., Piantadosi S. A. two-step timed sequential treatment for acute myelocytic leukemia. Blood, 74: 1499-1506, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Martino R., Guardia R., Altes A., Sureda A., Brunet S., Sierra J. Time sequential chemotherapy for primary refractory or relapsed adult acute myeloid leukemia: results of the Phase II GEMIA protocol. Haematologica, 84: 226-230, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Woods W. G., Alonzo T. A., Lange B. J., Jeha S., Estey E. H. Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in adolescents and young adults (AYAs): comparison of outcomes between patients treated on childhood or adult protocols. Blood, 98 (Suppl. 1): 462a 2001.
  22. Woods W. G., Kobrinsky N., Buckley J. D., Lee J. W., Sanders J., Neudorf S., Gold S., Barnard D. R., DeSwarte J., Dusenbery K., Kalousek D., Arthur D. C., Lange B. J. Timed-sequential induction therapy improves postremission outcome in acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the Children’s Cancer Group. Blood, 87: 4979-4989, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Ohno Y., Spriggs D., Matsukage A., Ohno T., Kufe D. Effects of 1-ß-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine incorporation on elongation of specific DNA sequences by DNA polymerase ß. Cancer Res., 48: 1494-1498, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Datta R., Banach D., Kojima H., Talanian R. V., Alnemri E. S., Wong W. W., Kufe D. W. Activation of the CPP32 protease in apoptosis induced by 1-ß-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine and other DNA-damaging agents. Blood, 88: 1936-1943, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Maik R. G., Kattice S. L., Bhat S. V., Alreja B., de Souza N. J., Rupp R. H. An anti-inflammatory cum immunomodulatory piperidinylbenzopyranone from Dysoxylum binectariferum: isolation, structure and total synthesis. Tetrahedron, 44: 2081-2086, 1988.[CrossRef]
  26. Senderowicz A. M., Sausville E. A. Preclinical and clinical development of cyclin-dependent kinase modulators. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. (Bethesda), 92: 376-387, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Bible K. C., Kaufmann S. H. Flavopiridol: a cytotoxic flavone that induces cell death in noncycling A549 human lung carcinoma cells. Cancer Res., 56: 4856-4861, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Konig A., Schwartz G. K., Mohammad R. M., Al-Katib A., Gabrilove J. L. The novel cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor flavopiridol down-regulates Bcl-2 and induces growth arrest and apoptosis in chronic B-cell leukemia lines. Blood, 90: 4307-4312, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Parker B. W., Kaur G., Nieves-Neira W., Taimi M., Kohlhagen G., Shimizu T., Losiewicz M. D., Pommier Y., Sausville E. A., Senderowicz A. M. Early induction of apoptosis in hematopoietic cell lines after exposure to flavopiridol. Blood, 91: 458-465, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Decker R. H., Dai Y., Grant S. The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor flavopiridol induces apoptosis in human leukemia cells (U937) through the mitochondrial rather than the receptor-mediated pathway. Cell Death Differ., 8: 715-724, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. De Azevedo W. F., Jr, Mueller-Diekmann H-J., Schulze-Gahmen U., Worland P. J., Sausville E., Kim S-H. Structural basis for specificity and potency of a flavonoid inhibitor of human CDK2, a cell cycle kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93: 2735-2740, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Carlson B. A., Dubay M. M., Sausville E. A., Brizuela L., Worland P. J. Flavopiridol induces G1 arrest with inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 2 and CDK 4 in human breast carcinoma cells. Cancer Res., 56: 2973-2978, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Losiewicz M. D., Carlson B. A., Kaur G., Sausville E. A., Worland P. J. Potent inhibition of CDC2 kinase activity by the flavonoid L86–8275. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 201: 589-595, 1994.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Worland P. J., Kaur G., Stetler-Stevenson M., Sebers S., Sartor O., Sausville E. A. Alteration of the phosphorylation state of p34cdc2 kinase by the flavone L86-8275 in breast carcinoma cells. Biochem. Pharmacol., 46: 1831-1840, 1993.[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Carlson B., Lahusen T., Loaiza-Perez A., Worland P. J., Pestell R., Albanese C., Sausville E. A., Senderowicz A. M. Down-regulation of cyclin D1 by transcriptional repression in MCF-7 human breast carcinoma cells induced by flavopiridol. Cancer Res., 59: 4634-4643, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Mellilo G., Sausville E. A., Cloud K., Lahusen T., Varresio L., Senderowicz A. Flavopiridol, a protein kinase inhibitor, down-regulates hypoxic induction of vascular endothelial growth factor expression in human monocytes. Cancer Res., 59: 5433-5437, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Aguayo A., Estey E. H., Kantarjian H., Mansouri T., Gidel C., Keating M., Giles F., Estrov Z., Barlogie B., Albitar M. Cellular vascular endothelial growth factor is a predictor of outcome in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood, 94: 3717-3721, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Aguayo A., Kantarjian H., Manshouri T., Gidel C., Estey E., Thomas D., Koller C., Estrov Z., O’Brien S., Keating M., Freireich E., Albitar M. Angiogenesis in acute and chronic leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood, 96: 2240-2245, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Sausville E. A. Complexities in the development of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor drugs. Trends Mol. Med., 8 (Suppl.): S32-S37, 2002.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Chao S. H., Price D. H. Flavopiridol inactivates P-TEFb and blocks most RNA polymerase II transcription in vivo. J. Biol. Chem., 276: 31793-31799, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Price D. H. P-TEFb, a cyclin-dependent kinase controlling elongation by RNA polymerase II. Mol. Cell. Biol., 20: 2629-2634, 2000.[Free Full Text]
  42. Lam L. T., Pickeral O. K., Peng A. C., Rosenwald A., Hurt E. M., Giltnane J. M., Averett L. M., Zhao H., Davis R. E., Sathyamoorthy M., Wahl L. M., Harris E. D., Mikovits J. A., Monks A. P., Hollingshead M. G., Sausville E. A., Staudt L. M. Genomic-scale measurement of mRNA turnover and the mechanisms of action of the anti-cancer drug flavopiridol. Genome Biol., 2: 1-11, 2001.[Medline]
  43. Bible K. C., Bible R. H., Jr, Kottke T. J., Svingen P. A., Xu K., Pang Y-P., Hajdu E., Kaufmann S. H. Flavopiridol binds to duplex DNA. Cancer Res., 60: 2419-2428, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Kaufmann S. H., Karp J. E., Svingen P. A., Krajewski S., Burke P. J., Gore S. D., Reed J. C. Elevated expression of the apoptotic regulator Mcl-1 at the time of leukemic relapse. Blood, 91: 991-1000, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Kitada S., Zapata J. M., Andreeff M., Reed J. C. Protein kinase inhibitors flavopiridol and 7-hydroxy-staurosporine down-regulate antiapoptosis proteins in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood, 96: 393-397, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Zhang B., Gojo I., Fenton R. G. MCL-1 is a critical survival factor for multiple myeloma. Blood, 99: 1885-1893, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Lee Y. K., Tidwell M. L., Kaufmann S. H., Karp J. E., Bible K. C. Flavopiridol disrupts STAT-3/DNA binding and down-regulates the downstream antiapoptotic protein MCL-1 in vivo in leukemic cells from flavopiridol-treated AML patients. Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res., 43: 127 2002.
  48. Karp J. E., Yang W., Tidwell M. L., Greer J., Wei D., Guo C., Ross D. D. Timed sequential therapy (TST) of acute leukemia with flavopiridol: in vitro model for a Phase I clinical trial. Blood, 98 (Suppl. 1): 594a 2001.
  49. Bible K. C., Kaufmann S. H. Cytotoxic synergy between flavopiridol (NSC 649890, L86-8275) and various antineoplastic agents: the importance of sequence of administration. Cancer Res., 57: 3375-3380, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Senderowicz A. M., Headlee D., Stinson S. F., Lush R. M., Kalil N., Villalba L., Hill K., Steinberg S. M., Figg W. D., Tompkins A., Arbuck S. G., Sausville E. A. Phase I trial of continuous infusion flavopiridol, a novel cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, in patients with refractory neoplasms. J. Clin. Oncol., 16: 2986-2999, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Donehower R. C., Karp J. E., Burke P. J. Pharmacology and toxicity of high-dose cytarabine by 72-hour continuous infusion. Cancer Treat. Rep., 70: 1059-1065, 1986.[Medline]
  52. Krishan A. Rapid flow cytometric analysis of mammalian cell cycle by propidium iodide staining. J. Biol. Chem., 166: 188-193, 1975.
  53. Ross D. D., Joneckis C. C., Ordonez J. V., Sisk A. M., Wu R. K., Hamburger A. W., Nora R. E. Estimation of cell survival by flow cytometric quantification of fluorescein diacetate/propidium iodide viable cell number. Cancer Res., 49: 3776-3782, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Harvey S., Decker R., Dai Y., Schaefer G., Tang L., Kramer L., Dent P., Grant S. Interactions between 2-flouroadenine 9-ß-D-arabinofuranoside and the kinase inhibitor UCN-01 in human leukemia and lymphoma cells. Clin. Cancer Res., 7: 320-330, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Tang L., Boise L. H., Dent P., Grant S. Potentiation of 1-ß-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine-mediated mitochondrial damage and apoptosis in human leukemia cells (U937) overexpressing bcl-2 by the kinase inhibitor 7-hydroxystaurosporine (UCN-01). Biochem. Pharmacol., 60: 1445-1456, 2000.[CrossRef][Medline]
  56. Byrd J. C., Shinn C., Waselenko J. K., Fuchs E. J., Lehman T. A., Nguyen P. L., Flinn I. W., Diehl L. F., Sausville E., Grever M. R. Flavopiridol induces apoptosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells via activation of caspase-3 without evidence of bcl-2 modulation or dependence on functional p53. Blood, 92: 3804-3816, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Rapoport A. P., Simons-Evelyn M., Chen T., Sidell R., Luhowskyj S., Rosell K., Obrig T., Hicks D., Hinkle P., Nahm M., Insel R. A., Abboud C. N. Flavopiridol induces apoptosis and caspase-3 activation of a newly characterized Burkitt’s lymphoma cell line containing mutant p53 genes. Blood Cells Mol. Dis., 27: 610-624, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
Y. Takada, G. Sethi, B. Sung, and B. B. Aggarwal
Flavopiridol Suppresses Tumor Necrosis Factor-Induced Activation of Activator Protein-1, c-Jun N-Terminal Kinase, p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK), p44/p42 MAPK, and Akt, Inhibits Expression of Antiapoptotic Gene Products, and Enhances Apoptosis through Cytochrome c Release and Caspase Activation in Human Myeloid Cells
Mol. Pharmacol., May 1, 2008; 73(5): 1549 - 1557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. E. Karp, B. D. Smith, M. J. Levis, S. D. Gore, J. Greer, C. Hattenburg, J. Briel, R. J. Jones, J. J. Wright, and A. D. Colevas
Sequential Flavopiridol, Cytosine Arabinoside, and Mitoxantrone: A Phase II Trial in Adults with Poor-Risk Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2007; 13(15): 4467 - 4473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. E. Karp, A. Passaniti, I. Gojo, S. Kaufmann, K. Bible, T. S. Garimella, J. Greer, J. Briel, B. D. Smith, S. D. Gore, et al.
Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Flavopiridol followed by 1-{beta}-D-Arabinofuranosylcytosine and Mitoxantrone in Relapsed and Refractory Adult Acute Leukemias
Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2005; 11(23): 8403 - 8412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ASH ANNUAL MEETING ABSTRACTSHome page
J. E. Karp, B. D. Smith, J. Greer, J. Briel, M. J. Levis, M. A. McDevitt, S. D. Gore, and A. D. Colevas
Phase II Clinical Trial of Flavopiridol (FL) Followed by ara-c and Mitoxantrone (AM) for Adults with Relapsed and Refractory Acute Leukemias.
Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts), November 16, 2005; 106(11): 2784 - 2784.
[Abstract]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Takada and B. B. Aggarwal
Flavopiridol Inhibits NF-{kappa}B Activation Induced by Various Carcinogens and Inflammatory Agents through Inhibition of I{kappa}B{alpha} Kinase and p65 Phosphorylation: ABROGATION OF CYCLIN D1, CYCLOOXYGENASE-2, AND MATRIX METALLOPROTEASE-9
J. Biol. Chem., February 6, 2004; 279(6): 4750 - 4759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
T. Nakanishi, J. E. Karp, M. Tan, L. A. Doyle, T. Peters, W. Yang, D. Wei, and D. D. Ross
Quantitative Analysis of Breast Cancer Resistance Protein and Cellular Resistance to Flavopiridol in Acute Leukemia Patients
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2003; 9(9): 3320 - 3328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karp, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Colevas, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karp, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Colevas, A. D.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online