
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Experimental Therapeutics, Preclinical Pharmacology |
Department of Medicine, Medical College of Virginia/Virginia Commonwealth University [S. G., G. W. K.], and McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center [J. L., P. C., G. S. W-G., G. W. K.], Richmond, Virginia 23249
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental Design: Cell growth was monitored using 3-(4,5dimethylthiazol-2yl)-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) and clonogenic assays. Induction of apoptosis was assessed using multiple assays, including flow cytometric determination of DNA content and mitochondrial membrane potential, terminal deoxynucleotide transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL), and Western blot analysis of procaspase 3 and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage.
Results: Flavopiridol induced growth inhibition and cytotoxicity in multiple SCLC cell lines, with an IC50 of 50100 nM and an LD50 of 150200 nM in 72-h MTT assays. The cytotoxicity seen in the MTT assay proved to be apoptosis by several criteria. Interestingly, inhibition of caspase activation with the caspase inhibitor Boc-Asp(OMe)-CH2F reduced TUNEL labeling by 40% but did not have any effect on the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential (detected as early as 4 h after drug exposure) or cytotoxicity in MTT assays. These results suggest that the primary event in flavopiridol-induced apoptosis involves induction of mitochondrial dysfunction. Cells synchronized with aphidicolin at the G1-S border and treated with flavopiridol during S phase showed a marked increase in apoptosis compared with an asynchronous population or a population treated during G2-M. Despite the increased apoptosis, a significant proportion of synchronized cells proceeded through S, G2-M, and into G1 phase in the presence of flavopiridol, demonstrating that a high-grade cell cycle arrest is not required for apoptosis. Cells synchronized at the G1-S border treated with a short exposure to flavopiridol also showed more than a 10-fold decrease in clonogenicity compared with asynchronous cells treated identically.
Conclusions: Taken together, these data demonstrate that flavopiridol potently and selectively induces SCLC apoptosis preferentially during S phase, in a manner that involves early mitochondrial dysfunction without a requirement for a high-grade block to cell cycle progression. Furthermore, clonogenicity data suggests that prior S phase synchronization could be a highly effective way of enhancing the efficacy of bolus or short infusions of flavopiridol in the clinical setting.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One molecular abnormality in SCLC that has become increasingly apparent is the loss of cell cycle regulation. It has been known for several years that the G1-S restriction point is defective, largely because of loss of function of the retinoblastoma gene product, which is mutationally altered in the vast majority of SCLC (4) . The G1-S DNA damage checkpoint is also defective because of the almost universal loss of p53 function (4) . Recently, it has been shown that the G2-M and M checkpoints are also defective, attributable, in large part, to mutation and aberrant methylation of the genes encoding multiple regulators of these complex checkpoints (5 , 6) . The net result of these genetic and epigenetic changes is that SCLC cell cycle progression is unresponsive to normal regulatory cues, and these tumors have a high degree of genetic instability at both the nucleotide and chromosomal level. A consequence of this genetic instability could be an enhanced ability to develop resistant clones under the selective pressure of a cyclical chemotherapy regimen.
One logical approach to counteract this loss of cell cycle regulation at multiple regulatory sites would be to interfere directly with the CDK cascade that drives cell cycle progression. CDKs 4 and 6 drive progression through G1, CDK2 is critical for entry and progression through S, and CDK1 (CDC2) is necessary for entry to and completion of mitosis (7 , 8) . Flavopiridol is a synthetic flavone derivative that is an effective inhibitor of all these CDKs, as well as other related enzymes that play ancillary roles in regulating cell cycle progression (9, 10, 11) . An early description of its effect on tumor cell growth demonstrated a block to cell cycle progression with IC50 values for inhibition of SCLC growth in the range of 25150 nM (12) . However, this study did not clearly indicate whether the end result of the block to cell cycle progression was cytostasis or apoptosis. Subsequent studies have shown that specific tumor cell types are particularly sensitive to the apoptotic effects of flavopiridol, including NSCLC (13 , 14) , lymphomas (15) , and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (16) .
The purpose of the present study was to more rigorously define the effect of flavopiridol on SCLC cell lines, with particular reference to the induction apoptosis and the biochemical mechanisms that may regulate this process. We demonstrate that SCLC cells are uniformly highly sensitive to flavopiridol-induced cytotoxicity during prolonged 72-h exposure to clinically achievable concentrations of this drug. In addition, induction of apoptosis is correlated with mitochondrial dysfunction. Apoptosis in response to short drug exposure (818 h) is greatly increased by S phase synchronization, a phenomenon that is accompanied by a dramatic decline in the clonogenic potential of S phase synchronized cells briefly exposed to flavopiridol. These observations may have translational implications for the use of flavopiridol in the treatment of SCLC and other malignancies.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clonogenic Assay.
H526 cells (1 x 104) were synchronized with aphidicolin as described above or left unsynchronized and then treated with DMSO vehicle (control) or 150 nM flavopiridol for 14 h in complete medium. The cells were then washed and resuspended in 3 ml of 0.25% low melting point agarose (SeaKem LE; FMC Bioproducts, Rockland, ME) in complete medium (without drugs) and plated over a layer of 0.5% agarose in medium in 60-mm plates. Plates were incubated for 14 days, and viable (blue) macroscopic colonies were counted 2 h after overlay with MTT dye. Assays were performed in triplicate.
TUNEL Assay.
Terminal deoxynucleotide transferase-mediated labeling of free DNA 3' ends with fluorescein-conjugated dUTP (19)
was accomplished using the In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Four independent x100 fields containing a minimum of 300 cells on each of two replicate slides were evaluated for nuclear labeling by fluorescence microscopy for each treatment or condition. For calculation of the mitotic index, cytospin preparations were stained with Wright-Giemsa stain (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) and the number of mitotic figures in four independent x100 fields containing a minimum of 200 cells was determined. The effect of caspase inhibition on TUNEL staining was determined by incubating cells in medium containing 25 µM Boc-D-FMK (Calbiochem).
Flow Cytometry.
Nuclear DNA content was determined by propidium iodide staining using the method of Vindelov et al. (20)
. Fluorescence was quantitated using a Becton-Dickinson FACScan cytofluorometer, and data were analyzed using the FACScan Research software package. Mitochondrial membrane potential (
M) was monitored using DiOC6 (Sigma Chemical Co.; Ref. 21
). For each condition, 4 x 105 cells were incubated in 1 ml of 40 nM DiOC6 at 37°C for 15 min and subsequently analyzed using the FACScan cytofluorometer with excitation and emission settings of 488 nm and 525 nm, respectively.
Western Blotting.
For preparation of whole cell lysates, cells were resuspended in ice-cold PBS, and an equal volume of 2x SDS buffer [2% SDS, 0.08 M Tris-HCI (pH 6.8), 0.1 M DTT, and 10% glycerol] was added, followed by shearing through a 25-gauge needle. Lysates were electrophoretically resolved on a 10% SDS polyacrylamide gel and transferred to Immobilon-P (Millipore, Bedford, MA) membrane using standard procedures, with detection using the enhanced chemiluminescence system (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL). Cytochrome c release into the cytosol was monitored by differential centrifugation with a kit from BioVision Research Products (Mountain View, CA), using the suppliers protocol and proprietary buffers. Staining was accomplished using the following antibodies: antiactin, monoclonal (Sigma Chemical Co.); anticleaved PARP, caspase 3, cleaved caspase 3, polyclonals (Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA); cytochrome c polyclonal (BioVision).
Determination of the Timing of S and G2-M Phases.
Cells were synchronized at the G1-S border with aphidicolin and then suspended in 0.1 ml of complete medium containing 0.5 µCi of [3H]thymidine (NEN, Boston, MA) in 96-well tissue culture plates. Eight replicate wells were harvested every 2 h and assayed by liquid scintillation counting. In parallel, cells were centrifuged onto glass slides at 2-h intervals, and the mitotic index was scored as above.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
200 nM.
|
To determine whether flavopiridol resulted in a loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, we exposed H526 cells grown in serum-containing medium to increasing concentrations of flavopiridol for 24 h. Mitochondrial membrane potential (
m) was assessed by flow cytometric determination of DiOC6 fluorescence. As shown in Fig. 4A
, the number of cells with a low
m increased in a flavopiridol dose-dependent fashion. To test the hypothesis that the loss of
m was an early caspase-independent event, we exposed H526 cells to 150 nM flavopiridol in the presence or absence of Boc-D-FMK for 24 h and assessed the loss of
m by measuring DiOC6 fluorescence. A 24-h exposure to flavopiridol caused a dramatic loss of mitochondrial membrane potential that was unaffected by the presence of the caspase inhibitor (Fig. 4B)
. Partial loss of
m was seen as early as 4 h after drug exposure (data not shown) and, therefore, is an early, and possibly the primary, event in the induction of flavopiridol-mediated SCLC apoptosis. The mechanism underlying loss of
m remains unclear but, because of the rapid onset, seems unlikely to be caused by cell cycle arrest. Changes in expression of both proapoptotic and antiapoptotic members of the Bcl-2 family have been known to result in loss of
m, but changes in expression levels of Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, Bad, Bak, Bim, Bid, and Bax after flavopiridol exposure were not observed (data not shown). Functional changes in these proteins mediated by postranslational modification remain a possibility, however.
|
To distinguish between the alternative possibilities, H526 cells were synchronized at the G1-S boundary using a 24-h treatment with the DNA polymerase inhibitor aphidicolin. After release of the block, H526 cells incorporate [3H]thymidine for 9 h and reach a peak mitotic index (as determined by Giemsa staining) between 14 and 16 h, defining the length of the S and G2 phases (data not shown). Table 1
shows that treatment of synchronized H526 cells with flavopiridol through the period of S-M enhances apoptosis >10-fold, relative to unsynchronized cells treated for the equivalent 18 h. To more specifically define whether the most sensitive period was in S or G2-M, we also limited flavopiridol treatment to the 8-h period immediately after release of the aphidicolin block (S), or to the 10- to 18-h period after release (G2-M). Treatment during G2-M did not induce significantly more apoptosis than the controls treated with flavopiridol or aphidicolin alone. Flavopiridol treatment confined to S phase did dramatically increase apoptosis, although not to the extent that treatment for the entire S-M period did. It was unclear whether this difference was a function of a longer exposure interval or of treatment of cells capable of exiting S in the presence of flavopiridol during both S and G2-M phases.
|
|
|
To determine whether S phase synchronization, followed by treatment with flavopiridol, leads to enhanced mitochondrial dysfunction, we also studied the extent of release of cytochrome c from mitochondria into the cytosol after a 13-h treatment with 150 nM flavopiridol. As shown in Fig. 5C
, synchronization with aphidicolin caused a marked increase in cytosolic cytochrome c, relative to unsynchronized cells, that did not show significant cytochrome c release relative to controls. Therefore, treatment of SCLC cells with flavopiridol during S phase appears to induce a greater degree of mitochondrial dysfunction than treatment of unsynchronized cells.
Synchronization of H526 Cells at the G1-S Boundary Markedly Enhances the Efficacy of Short-Term Flavopiridol Exposure in Clonogenic Assays.
Fig. 5B
shows that despite a marked increase in apoptosis after S phase synchronization, a significant fraction of cells continue to cycle 18 h after flavopiridol exposure. To determine whether the cells still in cycle after a short-term flavopiridol exposure would continue to proliferate or were destined to eventually die, we performed clonogenic assays using either unsynchronized cells or cells synchronized with aphidicolin and treated with 150 nM flavopiridol for 14 h. Fig. 6
shows that synchronization resulted in a >90% reduction in the number of colonies obtained after 14 days, in marked contrast to the limited effects of exposure of asynchronous cells to an identical concentration of flavopiridol. These results confirm that the effects of short-term exposure to flavopiridol can be markedly enhanced by treatment of cells during S phase. In addition, they demonstrate that the effects on clonogenic potential are greater than that observed when apoptosis is assessed 1418 h after flavopiridol exposure.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Flavopiridol potently inhibited the growth of multiple SCLC cell lines with an IC50 in the 50100 nM range. Between 100200 nM, apoptosis was selectively induced in these cell lines relative to the MRC-5 pulmonary fibroblast cell line, which was growth inhibited but did not undergo apoptosis at concentrations approximating a clinically achievable drug concentration (400 nM). Flavopiridol-induced apoptosis clearly involved caspase activation and DNA fragmentation as measured by the accumulation of cells with a sub-G1 DNA content, as well as by TUNEL staining. However, although inhibition of caspase activation partially inhibited DNA fragmentation, it had no effect on the early loss of mitochondrial membrane potential seen after flavopiridol exposure or the loss of cell viability measured by a 72-h MTT assay. These observations suggested that the primary event in flavopiridol-mediated cytotoxicity was early mitochondrial dysfunction and not caspase activation. The inability of caspase inhibition to protect cells from mitochondrial damage and nonapoptotic forms of cell death has been described previously (29) .
The mechanism of flavopiridol-induced apoptosis is of particular interest given the profound potentiation of apoptosis after synchronization of cells at the G1-S border with aphidicolin. Matranga and Shapiro (22)
first made this observation, noting that most NSCLC cell lines were resistant to flavopiridol-induced apoptosis, unless they were treated during S phase. By comparing the response of the one sensitive cell line (NCI-H661) to several resistant cell lines, they speculated that one important determinate of the apoptotic response to flavopiridol was the degree of flavopiridol-induced cell cycle arrest. In cells that displayed a high-grade G1 arrest in the presence of drug, the sensitive S phase would not be reached and the response would be cytostatic and not apoptotic. This may explain the highly variable cytostatic versus apoptotic response seen when many tumor types were studied (11)
and appears to be consistent with our data. The detection of a relatively low rate of TUNEL staining (approximately 58%) after a 24-h exposure of unsynchronized H526 cells to 150 nM flavopiridol, along with the extensive cytotoxicity seen in 72-h MTT assays, suggested that cells continued to cycle and eventually were exposed to drug during S phase. Data presented in Fig. 5
and Table 2
clearly show that cells treated with flavopiridol continue to progress through the cell cycle if they do not undergo apoptosis. Because of the enhanced flavopiridol sensitivity of SCLC cell lines relative to NSCLC, rather than treating for 24 h (22)
, we were able to limit drug exposure to specific phases of the cell cycle and, therefore, more clearly elucidate the cell cycle dependence of flavopiridol-induced apoptosis. Exposure of synchronized H526 cells to flavopiridol for 8 h, designed to limit exposure solely to S phase, enhanced apoptosis 5-fold relative to controls (Table 1)
. Exposure to drug for 18 h was required for the maximal 10-fold enhancement of apoptosis, and it was clear that some cells underwent apoptosis during mitosis. However, it was unclear whether the increased exposure interval or continued exposure during G2-M was the most important factor in producing maximal apoptosis, although exposure solely during G2-M did not enhance apoptosis relative to controls. Taken together, our data clearly demonstrate that short exposure solely during S phase is necessary and sufficient to markedly enhance flavopiridol-induced apoptosis, but longer drug exposures may further enhance the apoptotic rate.
The mechanism for the enhancement of flavopiridol-induced apoptosis by S phase synchronization is unclear. Although it is interesting to speculate that inhibition of the cyclin A-CDK2 complex may be particularly lethal (22)
, it is unlikely to be the sole explanation for several reasons. For example, Fig. 5
shows that flavopiridol-treated cells progress through S phase with timing similar to controls, suggesting that cyclin A-CDK2 inhibition is incomplete. In addition, continued incubation in aphidicolin, beyond the period of synchronization, markedly blunts the enhancement of flavopiridol-induced apoptosis by S phase synchronization. In the continued presence of aphidicolin, it is expected that cyclin A-CDK2 activity would remain high (30)
. Thus, it seems release from the aphidicolin block and, therefore, the process of active DNA synthesis is required for enhancement of flavopiridol-mediated apoptosis rather than inhibition of high cyclin A-CDK2 activity alone.
Whereas partial inhibition of cyclin A-CDK2 activity in the presence of active DNA synthesis may trigger lethal events, it is also likely that the early mitochondrial dysfunction is involved. Exposure of asynchronous cells to flavopiridol induces loss of mitochondrial membrane potential without enhancing cytochrome c release (Fig. 5)
, confirming an observation made by Achenbach et al. (31)
. They also showed that despite absence of cytochrome c release, cellular ATP content dropped significantly. Fig. 5C
shows that flavopiridol treatment after S phase synchronization markedly increased cytochrome c release, suggesting that, in addition to the potential for amplification of caspase activation by released cytochrome c, the degree of mitochondrial dysfunction was enhanced. DNA synthesis is a highly energy-dependent process, and it may be that in the presence of severe mitochondrial dysfunction the tumor cell is unable to maintain an adequate energy supply for both DNA synthesis and viability. Flavopiridol is competitive for ATP binding to its known target enzymes, and, thus, diminishing ATP levels could also markedly affect both its activity and specificity.
Given these findings, the mechanism of enhancement of flavopiridol-mediated apoptosis during S phase is likely to be complex and requires further detailed studies for its elucidation. However, regardless of the underlying mechanism, this phenomenon could be clinically exploitable. For example, a single brief treatment with 150 nM flavopiridol after S phase synchronization produced more than a 10 fold reduction in colonies in a clonogenic assay relative to flavopiridol alone and an
95% reduction compared with the vehicle control. This observation could directly address one of the major problems in the clinical development of flavopiridol, the selection of an appropriate dose and schedule (11)
. The original Phase I studies were designed using a 72-h continuous infusion based on the assumption that the drug would have a cytostatic effect (32
, 33)
. These studies yielded a MTD of 78 mg/m2/day with diarrheal prophylaxis, resulting in a steady-state concentration of 344 nM (32)
, and a MTD of 40 mg/m2/day without diarrheal prophylaxis, resulting in a steady-state concentration of 416 nM (33)
. This concentration range should be adequate to produce significant cytotoxicity in SCLC, based on the results of our 72-h MTT assays (Fig. 1)
, and, thus, should elicit serious consideration of a clinical trial of flavopiridol in SCLC. However, preclinical data indicated that bolus administration, which yields higher peak levels, may be more efficacious, and a new Phase I trial using bolus administration was performed (34)
. This trial demonstrated that a single 1-h infusion at the MTD (62.5 mg/m2) produced mean plasma levels of 195 nM 10 h after the infusion. Both the concentration and time interval are comparable with those we have used in conjunction with S phase synchronization. The results of our clonogenic assays would suggest that a strategy to induce S phase synchronization, such as treatment with hydroxyurea or gemcitabine (22)
, followed by a single bolus or short infusion of flavopiridol, could be a practical and more effective method of administering flavopiridol to patients with SCLC. Given the observation that non-neoplastic cells are apparently not sensitized to flavopiridol by S phase synchronization (22)
, such a strategy may also be less toxic and may, therefore, deserve further exploration in the clinical setting.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This work was supported in part by a Merit Review Award from the Department of Veterans Affairs (to G. W. K.).
1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Richmond Veterans Affairs Medical Center (111K), 1201 Broad Rock Boulevard, Richmond, VA 23249. Phone: (804) 675-5446; Fax: (804) 675-5447; E-mail: gkrystal{at}hsc.vcu.edu ![]()
2 The abbreviations used are: SCLC, small cell lung cancer; CDK, cyclin-dependent kinase; MTT, 3-(4,5dimethylthiazol-2yl)-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide; PARP, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase; TUNEL, terminal deoxynucleotide transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling; Boc-D-FMK, Boc-Asp(OMe)-CH2F; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; MTD, maximum tolerated dose; SCF, stem cell factor. ![]()
Received 1/10/03; revised 4/10/03; accepted 5/17/03.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
at 17p13.3 in small cell lung cancers. Cancer Res., 62: 271-276, 2002.
in human lung cancers. Oncogene, 21: 2418-2424, 2002.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Ge, J. S. Byun, P. De Luca, G. Gueron, I. M. Yabe, S. G. Sadiq-Ali, W. D. Figg, J. Quintero, C. M. Haggerty, Q. Q. Li, et al. Combinatorial Antileukemic Disruption of Oxidative Homeostasis and Mitochondrial Stability by the Redox Reactive Thalidomide 2-(2,4-Difluoro-phenyl)-4,5,6,7-tetrafluoro-1H-isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione (CPS49) and Flavopiridol Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2008; 74(3): 872 - 883. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-R. A. Hussain, D. M. Lucas, A. J. Johnson, T. S. Lin, A. P. Bakaletz, V. X. Dang, S. Viatchenko-Karpinski, A. S. Ruppert, J. C. Byrd, P. Kuppusamy, et al. Flavopiridol causes early mitochondrial damage in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells with impaired oxygen consumption and mobilization of intracellular calcium Blood, March 15, 2008; 111(6): 3190 - 3199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Karp, A. Passaniti, I. Gojo, S. Kaufmann, K. Bible, T. S. Garimella, J. Greer, J. Briel, B. D. Smith, S. D. Gore, et al. Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Flavopiridol followed by 1-{beta}-D-Arabinofuranosylcytosine and Mitoxantrone in Relapsed and Refractory Adult Acute Leukemias Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2005; 11(23): 8403 - 8412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Puppo, S. Pastorino, G. Melillo, A. Pezzolo, L. Varesio, and M. C. Bosco Induction of Apoptosis by Flavopiridol in Human Neuroblastoma Cells Is Enhanced under Hypoxia and Associated With N-myc Proto-oncogene Down-Regulation Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2004; 10(24): 8704 - 8719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |