
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates |
Division of Environmental Medicine, National Defense Medical College Research Institute, Tokorozawa 359-8513, Japan [K. N.]; Department of Pathology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa 359-8513, Japan [T. K., F. K., S. H.]; Division of Diagnostic Pathology, [M. M.] and Pathology [E. I.], Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan; and Laboratoire de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire de lEcole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, UMR 5665 CNRS/ENSL, 69364 Lyon Cedex 07, France [C. E. K., E. G.]
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Results: A clear overexpression of these mRNAs was recognized in low- and high-grade AAH and BAC samples (as compared with normal tissues) using in situ hybridization and these mRNAs were detected in normal AAH and BAC samples using reverse transcription-PCR. The expressions of TERF1 and TERF2 mRNA detected by in situ hybridization were scored positive in 36% and 82% of low-grade AAH, 65% and 83% of high-grade AAH, and 88% and 88% of BAC, respectively. Statistically significant differences in TERF1 mRNA expression could be shown between low-grade AAH and BAC and between high-grade AAH and BAC. There was no statistical difference in the positive expressions of TERF2 mRNA among low-grade AAH, high-grade AAH, and BAC.
Conclusions: These results are consistent with (but are not enough to confirm) the idea that high-grade AAH is closely related to BAC.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Telomerase is a ribonucleoprotein enzyme that synthesizes telomeric DNA at the end of chromosomes and compensates for the end replication problem, allowing cells to proliferate indefinitely (5, 6, 7) . Using the PCR-based telomerase repeat amplification protocol assay, it has been shown that telomerase is activated in a large majority of human cancer tissues, but not in most normal tissues or in tissues adjacent to malignant or benign tumors (8) . Therefore, it appears that telomerase activity is a useful marker for cancer detection.
Two major subunits of the human telomerase core complex, namely, hTERC and hTERT, have been identified. hTERC, which was identified first, functions as a template for telomere elongation by telomerase (9, 10, 11) . hTERT contains a reverse transcriptase domain that catalyzes this reaction (12, 13, 14) . Recent studies have demonstrated that hTERC and hTERT form the minimum complex needed for telomerase activity (13 , 14) . Therefore, up-regulation of hTERC and hTERT expressions could play an important role in human carcinogenesis. More recently, telomere-specific DNA-binding proteins such as TRF1 and TRF2 have been put forward as additional candidates for the role of molecules modifying telomerase activity, and they have been suggested to play key roles in the maintenance of telomere function (15, 16, 17, 18) . In fact, TRF1 negatively regulates the maintenance of telomere length (15 , 16 , 18) . Although TRF2 was initially implicated in the protection of chromosome ends (15 , 16) , more recent reports show that TRF2 protein is a second negative regulator of telomere length (17) acting at least in part independently of telomerase by activating a degradation pathway (18) .
Although several investigations have been made of telomerase activity and/or the subunits of human telomerase in lung carcinomas and AAH (11 , 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24) , no studies have investigated the expressions of TERF1 and TERF2 mRNAs in AAH. We therefore examined their expressions in the AAHs and peripherally located BACs (measuring 20 mm or less in the greatest diameter) that were available to us and compared the results with those obtained previously for hTERC and hTERT mRNA expressions in the same specimens. For this, we used primarily an in situ hybridization approach and also the RT-PCR.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
pflagTRF1 (26)
was digested by restriction enzymes EcoRI and XhoI, ligated between the EcoRI and XhoI cloning sites of pGEM7Zf (Promega), and then labeled with biotin using a RNA labeling kit (Boehringer Mannheim). The antisense probe was a 247-bp segment of TERF1 cDNA under a SP6 promoter, and the corresponding sense probe was a 247-bp segment of TERF1 cDNA under a T7 promoter. pBSK+TRF2 (27)
was digested by restriction enzymes PvuII and PstI, ligated between the PvuII and PstI cloning sites of pSP72 (Promega), and then labeled with biotin using a RNA labeling kit (Boehringer Mannheim). The antisense probe was a 1007-bp segment of TERF1 cDNA under a SP6 promoter, and the corresponding sense probe was a 1007-bp segment of TERF1 cDNA under a T7 promoter. Lung carcinomas with telomerase activity served as a positive control. The corresponding sense probe was used for the negative control. In situ hybridization of hTERC and hTERT mRNA was determined as described previously; the technique used and the results in these same patients have been reported elsewhere (28)
. For analysis of reactivity, the extent of staining was scored as follows: (a) -, a negative reaction of tumor cells; (b) ±,
10% of tumor area stained; (c) +, 1125% of tumor area stained; (d) 2+, 2650% of tumor area stained; and (e) 3+,
51% of tumor area stained. Those tumors in which the stained tumor cells made up >10% of the tumor were graded as positive.
For examination of TERF1 and TERF2 mRNAs by RT-PCR, total mRNAs were obtained from six normal lung tissues, one high-grade AAH, and six BACs (the only suitable materials available from our stock). The total RNA was isolated using acid guanidinium isothiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation (29)
. RT-PCR was performed using an amplification reagent kit (TaqMan EZRT-PCR kit; Applied Biosystems, Alameda, CA) with TERF1, TERF2, and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase primers. Six primers were synthesized using an automated DNA synthesizer. Sequence information for all of the PCR primers used is listed in Table 1
, together with the thermocycling conditions. The reaction master mix was prepared according to the manufacturers protocol to give final concentrations of 1x reaction buffer, 300 µM dATP, 300 µM dCTP, 300 µM dGTP, 600 µM dUTP, 3 mM Mg(OAc)2, 0.1 unit/µl rTth DNA polymerase, 0.01 unit/µl AmpErase UNG, 900 nM primers, and 200 nM TaqMan probe. To perform PCR, the reverse transcription reaction was incubated at 60°C for 30 min, followed by incubation at 95°C for 5 min to deactivate AmpErase UNG. PCR was performed using an ABI PRISM 9600 Sequence detector (Applied Biosystems). PCR products were separated by electrophoresis in a 3% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide.
|
2 analysis. Regression analysis among TERF1, TERF2, hTERC, and hTERT mRNA expressions was performed using Spearmans correlation coefficient by rank. P < 0.05 was considered significant. | RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Expression of TERF1 mRNA was confined to the cytoplasm of tumor cells (Fig. 2)
. In the normal lung, TERF1 mRNA was detected focally as weak to moderate staining in serous cells and ductal cells within bronchial glands and in nonciliated cells within bronchioles. Alveolar type I and type II cells were negative. A positive TERF1 mRNA expression was recognized in 36% of low-grade AAH (4 of 11 lesions), 65% of high-grade AAH (11 of 17 lesions), and 88% of BAC (35 of 40 lesions). Statistically, the differences between low-grade AAH and BAC and between high-grade AAH and BAC were significant (P = 0.0004 and P = 0.046, respectively).
|
|
When RT-PCR was used, TERF1 and TERF2 mRNAs were detected in all samples examined (six normal lung tissues, one high-grade AAH, and six BACs), although the strength of their expressions varied (Fig. 4)
.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, TERF1 mRNA was detected only focally in normal lung tissues (in the nonciliated cells of the bronchioles and in both the serous cells and ductal cells of the bronchial glands) using in situ hybridization, whereas using RT-PCR, it was detected in all of the total RNA samples obtained from six normal lung tissues. Although the reason for this discrepancy is unclear, one possibility is that the probes used for in situ hybridization may be of lower sensitivity than the primers used for RT-PCR.
On the basis of the evidence obtained using in situ hybridization in the present study, overexpression of TERF1 mRNA is found in both AAH and BAC: we found it in 54% of all AAH (15 of 28 lesions), but in 88% of BAC (35 of 40 lesions). These figures accord well with the figures obtained for the incidence of overexpression of hTERC and hTERT mRNAs in our previous study (55% and 59% in AAH and 98% and 98% in BAC, respectively; Ref. 28
). Furthermore, we found that the staining scores obtained for TERF1 mRNA paralleled the staining scores obtained for hTERC and hTERT mRNAs in these same patients (Spearmans correlation coefficient by rank). Recent studies have established that hTERC and hTERT form the minimum complex required for telomerase activity (13
, 14)
. Despite the up-regulation of telomerase activity that occurs in activated normal lymphocytes, however, telomeres still shortened to some extent, as observed when the culture was continued for many weeks (30
, 31)
. Furthermore, overexpression of TRF1 in the tetracyclin-responsive human fibrosarcoma cell line HTC75 resulted in a gradual decline in telomere length at a rate of
10 bp/population doubling (17)
, and the forced tethering of a large number of TRF1 molecules to a single telomere induced a shortening rate of
80 bp/population doubling (18)
. TRF1 does not affect telomerase activity globally within the cell, but clearly an excess of TRF1 inhibits cis telomerase activity at the telomere itself (18)
. Therefore, in AAH and BAC, too, overexpression of TERF1 mRNA may partially counteract telomerase activation, limiting telomere elongation. However, these findings may not necessarily indicate an acquisition of malignant potential. Confirmation of a role for TRF1 in the carcinogenesis of BAC would require a large-scale study using molecular techniques showing that this parameter does indeed influence the carcinoma sequence.
It has been shown that telomerase activity is not present in most normal tissues (8) and that the expression of hTERT correlates closely with telomerase activity both in vitro and in vivo (12) . Furthermore, the transcription of hTERT may play a part in the mechanism by which telomerase regulation is achieved. In several studies, telomerase activity was detected during the early phase (intestinal metaplasia to adenoma in colon and stomach and dysplasia to carcinoma in situ in uterine cervix) of carcinogenesis (11 , 32, 33, 34) . Those authors (11 , 32, 33, 34) suggested that hTERT mRNA expression is up-regulated, that telomerase activation is a critical step during tumor carcinogenesis, and that both can be recognized at an early stage in the oncogenic process. In our previous study, we found hTERT mRNA expression not only in BAC but also in AAH using in situ hybridization. The incidence of hTERT mRNA expression was higher in low-grade AAH than in normal lung tissues. Likewise, in the present study using in situ hybridization, TERF1 and TERF2 mRNAs each showed an increased incidence in low-grade AAH (compared with normal lung tissues), and this was particularly marked in the case of TERF2 mRNA, although both mRNAs were detected using RT-PCR in all of the total RNA samples obtained from six normal lung tissues, one high-grade AAH, and six BACs. We could not detect TERF2 mRNA at all in normal lung alveolar cells, and it was detected only focally as weak to moderate staining in nonciliated bronchiolar cells using in situ hybridization. Recently, Smogorzewska et al. (17) reported that an overexpression of TRF2 in HCT75 cell lines was accompanied by a progressive shortening of telomere length, a phenotype similar to that observed with TRF1. They suggested that overexpression of TRF2 may play a regulatory role in the maintenance of telomerase length in these lesions, as does overexpression of TRF1. Furthermore, this notion was supported when Matsutani et al. (35) , who dealt with 20 gastric carcinomas using RT-PCR, showed that carcinomas with a short telomere length (shorter than 2 kb) exhibited a higher TRF1 expression and tended to express TRF2 more strongly than those with a long telomere length. Therefore, we suspect that in AAH, too, overexpression of TERF2 mRNA may exert a negative regulatory influence over telomere length. The fact that TERF2 mRNA expression does not correlate with telomerase expression is in agreement with the recent finding that TRF2 can shorten telomeres without inactivating telomerase (18) . The important overexpression of TRF2 in precursor lesions, even in low-grade AAH, suggests that TRF2 plays a key role in the early steps of carcinogenesis, for instance by inducing telomere dysfunction and/or by altering checkpoint controls. However, these findings, as well as the expression of TRF1, may not necessarily indicate the acquisition of malignant potential. Confirmation of a role for TRF2 in the carcinogenesis of BAC also needs further study using molecular techniques.
In conclusion, although our finding of an increasing incidence of TERF1 mRNA from low-grade AAH through high-grade AAH to BAC (using in situ hybridization) may be consistent with the idea that high-grade AAH is a lesion closely associated with BAC of the lung, it is not, by itself, sufficient to confirm the validity of that idea. However, the incidence of TERF1 mRNA and, even more markedly, that of TERF2 mRNA were found to be above normal in low-grade AAH using in situ hybridization. Interestingly, overexpression of TRF1, but not of TRF2, appears to correlate with telomerase activation, suggesting distinct effects of TRF1 and TRF2 during carcinogenesis in BAC of the lung. TRF1 and TRF2 interact with other factors that regulate telomere length [reviewed in Mergny et al. (36) ]. These include a second enzyme, tankyrase (which binds TRF1), PinX1 and TIN2 (two negative regulators of telomerases interaction with TRF1), and hRAP1 (which interacts with TRF2). Clearly, additional studies will be required to examine the alterations in the complete set of telomere-associated proteins in the course of neoplastic transformation in high-grade AAH.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed. Phone: 81-42-995-1505; Fax: 81-42-996-5192; E-mail: tkawai{at}cc.ndmc.ac.jp ![]()
2 The abbreviations used are: AAH, atypical adenomatous hyperplasia; TRF, telomeric repeat binding factor; BAC, bronchioloalveolar carcinoma; RT-PCR, reverse transcription-PCR; hTERC, human telomerase RNA component; hTERT, human telomerase reverse transcriptase. ![]()
Received 4/29/02; revised 10/29/02; accepted 11/ 4/02.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. M. Raynaud, S. J. Jang, P. Nuciforo, S. Lantuejoul, E. Brambilla, N. Mounier, K. A. Olaussen, F. Andre, L. Morat, L. Sabatier, et al. Telomere shortening is correlated with the DNA damage response and telomeric protein down-regulation in colorectal preneoplastic lesions Ann. Onc., July 17, 2008; (2008) mdn405v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Poncet, A. Belleville, C. t'Kint de Roodenbeke, A. Roborel de Climens, E. Ben Simon, H. Merle-Beral, E. Callet-Bauchu, G. Salles, L. Sabatier, J. Delic, et al. Changes in the expression of telomere maintenance genes suggest global telomere dysfunction in B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia Blood, February 15, 2008; 111(4): 2388 - 2391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Lin, J. Gu, C. Lu, M. R. Spitz, and X. Wu Expression of telomere-associated genes as prognostic markers for overall survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2006; 12(19): 5720 - 5725. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B.-K. Oh, Y.-J. Kim, C. Park, and Y. N. Park Up-Regulation of Telomere-Binding Proteins, TRF1, TRF2, and TIN2 Is Related to Telomere Shortening during Human Multistep Hepatocarcinogenesis Am. J. Pathol., January 1, 2005; 166(1): 73 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |