
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates |
Department of Urology, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris-CHU Mondor, 94000 Créteil, France [A. d. l. T., F. V., S. G-D. d. M., D. C.]; Department of Pathology and Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan [M. A. R.]; and Department of Pathology and Urology, Columbia University, New York, New York [M-W. C., M. B., R. B.]
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental Design: Apoptosis-resistant human prostate cancer cell line variants were derived from parental LNCaP cells by repeated brief exposure to apoptotic stimuli. The derivative and parental cells were analyzed for ß-catenin expression and intracellular localization using cell fractionation and Western blotting procedures. Endogenous transcriptional activity from the TCF/LEF-1 response element was also studied in these variants after transfection with a ß-catenin sensitive reporter plasmid. Finally, ß-catenin protein expression and intracellular localization were evaluated on 212 patients [122 localized PrCa and 90 hormone-refractory (HRPC) PrCa specimens by immunohistochemistry].
Results: Western blot analysis showed that the intracellular partitioning of ß-catenin was shifted from the membrane fraction in parental cells to the cytoplasmic/nuclear fractions of the apoptosis-resistant cell lines. Coordinately, transcriptional activity from a TCF/LEF-promoted reporter plasmid was increased significantly in the apoptosis-resistant lines. In the primary prostate tumors analyzed, cytoplasmic and/or nuclear ß-catenin expression was correlated statistically with the HRPC status and Gleason score. In the group of localized PrCa, abnormal ß-catenin expression tended to be associated with a higher Gleason score and with pT3 disease. No mutation was found in patients with HRPC and abnormal ß-catenin expression.
Conclusion: These data suggest that anomalies of ß-catenin expression occur in PrCa and that these anomalies are associated with disease progression, especially to the therapeutic-resistant state.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Since its discovery as a protein associated with the cytoplasmic domain of E-cadherin, ß-catenin has been shown to be involved in two important functions: it has a crucial role in cell-cell adhesion in addition to a signaling role as an end component of the Wnt/wg signaling pathway. Whereas both functions are involved in the control of normal embryonic development, the latter function appears to be especially critical for its involvement in the development of solid tissue malignancies. As exemplified by our understanding of the role of ß-catenin in colon cancer, abnormally high levels of this protein (in conjunction with the TCF/LEF-1 transcription factor) in colon cancer cells transcriptionally up-regulates expression of cell growth-promoting gene products such as c-jun, c-myc, and cyclin D1, as well as inducing a state of apoptosis resistance (18 , 19) . The accumulation of ß-catenin in colon cancer cells is generally associated with dysfunctions in its post-translational processing because of direct mutations in the ß-catenin coding sequences that render its translation product refractory to an active degradation process or because of mutations within the APC gene, of which the product is one factor that controls the ß-catenin degradation process (18 , 20 , 21) . Any of these defects enable accumulation of ß-catenin protein within the cytoplasm of the cancer cell and its translocation (in conjunction with TCF/LEF-1) to the nucleus where its effects on transcription are exerted (21 , 22) . Thus, not only are the expression levels of ß-catenin perturbed in the colon cancer cell, its intracellular distribution is also altered significantly so that it is found in the cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions of the cancer cell in addition to its normal association with the membrane fraction via interaction with the classical cadherins (21) .
To better evaluate the extent to which ß-catenin action might be involved in prostate cancer progression to the therapeutic-resistant state, we analyzed a unique set of prostate cancer cell lines (LNCaP-TR3 and LNCaP-SSR), which have acquired an apoptotic-resistant phenotype as a result of repeated transient exposures of an apoptosis-sensitive human prostate cancer cell line, LNCaP, to apoptotic agents (23) . Using the parental and progeny cell lines, and a large series of primary human prostate tumor specimens obtained from patients under treatment for prostate cancer, we evaluated the expression levels and intracellular distribution of the ß-catenin protein to determine whether there might be any anomalies relevant to the development or progression of this common solid tumor system.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subcellular Fractionation of Cell Lines, Protein Extraction, and Western Blot Analysis.
Subcellular fractionated protein extracts were made from the parental LNCaP, LNCaP-SSR, and LNCaP-TR lines. After washing in ice-cold PBS, they were resuspended in 5 volume of buffer A [10 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 1.5 mM MgCl2 and 0.5 mM DTT] and incubated for 10 min on ice. The cells were then lysed by homogenization with a Polytron tissue homogenizer (Brinkmann Instruments, Westbury, NY). The homogenate was centrifuged for 10 min at 3,500 rpm, and the supernatant was designated the cytoplasmic protein fraction. The pellet was resuspended in 0.11 volume of buffer B [0.15 M HEPES (pH 7.9), 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, and 0.015 mg/ml aprotinin] and was centrifuged at 100,000 x g for 60 min. The supernatant of this extract (containing the membrane protein fraction) was dialyzed 58 h against buffer D [20 mM HEPES, 20% (v/v) glycerol, 0.1 M KCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 0.5 mM DTT]. The nuclear protein fraction was extracted as described by Dignam et al. (24)
. After washing cells in PBS, they were suspended in 5 packed cell pellet volumes of buffer A and allowed to stand 10 min on ice. The cells were collected by centrifugation and lysed in 2 volumes of buffer A by 10 strokes of a Kontes all-glass Dounce homogenizer. The homogenate was centrifuged for 10 min at 2,000 rpm. The pellet was suspended in buffer A (1 ml) and was centrifuged at 25,000 x g for 20 min. The pellets (crude nuclei) were resuspended in buffer C [3 ml for 109 cells, 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 25% (v/v) glycerol, 0.42 M NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 0.5 mM DTT] and were homogenized with the Polytron tissue homogenizer. The suspension was stirred gently for 30 min and centrifuged for 30 min at 25,000 x g. The resulting clear supernatant was dialyzed against 50 volumes of buffer D for 5 h. The dialysate was centrifuged at 25,000 x g for 20 min, and the supernatant was considered to be the nuclear protein fraction. For Western blotting, 50 µg aliquots of each protein fraction were coelectrophoresed on an 8% acrylamide SDS gel. After electrotransfer to nitrocellulose membranes, E-cadherin (Transduction Laboratories, Inc., Lexington, KY),
-catenin (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO), ß-catenin (Transduction Laboratories, Inc.) and nuclear lamin proteins (control for nuclear protein loading, lamin A/C antibody; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA) were detected by Western blotting in a similar manner to that described previously (23)
using antibody dilutions as recommended by the manufacturer.
Assays for Transcriptional Response to a ß-Catenin/Tcf Transcriptional Promoter Element.
LNCaP cell variants were tested for ß-catenin/Tcf transcriptional activity by transient transfection with the pTOP-Flash reporter plasmid (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc., Lake Placid, NY; Refs. 22
, 25
) in which the expression of luciferase is promoted by three tandem copies of the optimal Tcf-response element (CCTTGATC) adjacent to the minimal c-fos promoter. Control cultures were transiently transfected with the pFOP-Flash reporter plasmid, containing all of the regulatory elements of the pTOP-Flash plasmid, except that the Tcf response motifs contain mutations (CCTTGGCC) that prevent its functional activation by Tcf. All of the transient transfections also contained an internal control reporter plasmid containing ß-gal promoted by an SV40 promoter. Cells (2 x 106, in triplicate cultures) were transfected with 10 µg of pTOP-Flash or pFOP-Flash in the presence of 1 µg of the ß-gal reporter plasmid using a standard transfection protocol involving lipofectin (23)
. Four h after transfection, the transfection medium was replaced with RPMI 1640 containing 10% fetal bovine serum, and the incubation was continued in this medium for 48 h. Cells were then collected by scraping, pelleted and washed in ice cold PBS, and a cytosol was prepared by incubation in ice-cold radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer followed by centrifugation at 10,000 x g to remove debris. The cytosol extracts were assayed for protein content using the Bio-Rad Protein Assay System. Luciferase and ß-gal activity in the extracts were measured using the Luciferase Assay System (Promega, Inc., Madison, WI) or the Galacto-Light Assay System (Tropix, Inc., Bedford, MA). Activity in the assays was measured by a luminometer (TD 20/20; Turner Design, Inc.). Results of pTOP-Flash or pFOP-Flash transfections are reported as the ratio of luciferase to ß-gal activity for each of the cell lines.
Human Tissues.
To evaluate ß-catenin expression in human specimens, immunohistochemistry was performed on 212 specimens containing prostate cancer. These specimens include 122 from patients initially diagnosed with presumed clinically localized prostate cancer (since 1993) who were treated by radical prostatectomy at the Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center (New York, NY). Clinical follow-up data were available on all of these consecutive cases. The mean follow-up time was 3.6 years (range, 0.65.2 years). Twenty-six of these patients with clinically localized disease had received 3 months of hormonal neoadjuvant therapy. However, the vast majority of these specimens are presumed to contain hormone-sensitive prostate cancers. For patients who had received radical prostatectomy, PSA failure was defined as a rise of serum PSA >0.2 ng/ml on two consecutive occasions. The time of failure was measured from the date of surgery to the first of the two consecutive elevated serum PSA levels. All of the radical prostatectomy specimens were evaluated in a standard fashion. Specimens were inked before processing. SM from the apex and base were taken as shaved margins. These sections were considered positive if any ink was seen on tumor. Alternate sections were submitted from the apex to base. One pathologist (M. A. R.) reviewed all of the cases for this study. Extraprostatic extension was diagnosed if tumor was seen in the periprostatic soft tissue or was seen penetrating through a fibromuscular capsule coming out on the other side. The SVs were evaluated at the junction where they enter the prostate gland. All of the pelvic lymph nodes were evaluated for the presence of metastatic disease. All of the cases were assigned a GS. After review of each slide of the pathological specimens obtained from a given radical prostatectomy specimen, a fresh-cut slide from the block containing tissue with the highest density of tumor cells and the highest Gleason score was selected for immunohistochemical staining. Ninety additional cases of HRPC specimens were also obtained from transurethral resection of the prostate done for bladder obstruction (HRPC status was defined as patients having PSA progression despite complete androgen blockade therapy, a castrated level of testosterone, and following patient testing for the antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome).
Immunohistochemical Detection of ß-Catenin in Human Prostate Cancer Specimens.
Standard avidin-biotin complex peroxidase immunohistochemical staining was performed on a 5-µm-thick section from paraffin embedded, formalin fixed tissue. The ß-catenin antibody (Transduction Laboratories, Inc.) was used to identify ß-catenin expression in prostate cancer cells. ß-Catenin protein expression was evaluated for staining intensity and location in tumor cells (i.e., membranous, cytoplasmic, and/or nuclear). Each case was examined at low power first to identify areas of tumor and normal prostate. At x200 and x400 magnification, the staining of normal secretory epithelium was compared with the tumor cells in the specimen. Because normal secretory epithelium had a membrane-specific staining pattern, cancer cells exhibiting a similar quality staining were considered to have the "normal" pattern. Abnormal ß-catenin expression was defined as a cytoplasmic and/or nuclear staining.
Analysis for ß-Catenin Mutations in Cell Lines and Hormone-refractory Prostate Cancer Specimens.
Eight tumor RNA samples from patients with HRPC disease and abnormal ß-catenin expression were assessed for mutations in exon 3 of ß-catenin (CTNNB1), the region of the gene in which mutations have been identified in prostate and in other human tumors (26)
. Exon 3 of ß-catenin was amplified by PCR using primers bcat-fwd1 (5'-GCTGATTTGATGGAGTTGGA-3') and bcat-rev1 (5'-GCTACTTGTTCTTGAGTGAA-3'). Reactions contained 2 mM MgCl2 and 1 unit of Taq polymerase. Cycling conditions included initial denaturation for 5 min at 94°C; 35 cycles of denaturation for 30 s at 94°C; 30 s annealing at 55°C; 30 s elongation at 72°C; followed by a final elongation step for 7 min at 72°C. Then reverse transcription-PCR products were sequenced directly.
Statistical Analysis.
SPSS 9.0.1 (SPSS Inc.) and StatView 4.55 (Abacus Concepts, Inc., Berkeley, CA) were used for the statistical analysis. All of the tests were performed at the 0.05 significance level. Student test was used to compare two continuous variables. All of the data were summarized using method of Kaplan Meier. Comparisons between curves were carried out with the log-rank test.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-catenin or ß-catenin. As is shown in Fig. 1
-Catenin, a cell structural protein that anchors actin filaments, was also highly enriched in the membrane fractions as might be expected from its known association with cytoplasmic domains of the classical cadherins on the cell surface. This protein was equally present in each of the membrane extracts, but was also present in the cytoplasmic fractions. The ß-catenin protein was restricted to the membrane fraction of the parental LNCaP cells only consistent with its affinity for cell surface cadherins. However, the apoptosis-resistant LNCaP-TR and -SSR variants demonstrated anomalous ß-catenin protein in both the cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions of these cells.
|
|
23% of prostate cancers obtained from radical prostatectomy specimens, most of which are presumed to be hormonally sensitive. This proportion was significantly lower that what was observed in specimens from patients with HRPC (38%), and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.042). We also observed that abnormal ß-catenin expression was correlated with Gleason score (see Fig. 4
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-catenin, axin, glycogen synthase kinase-3ß, and adenomatous polyposis coli (27)
. Many of these proteins function by regulating the ability of the ß-catenin protein to survive a post-translational degradation processes in the cytoplasm and to enter the nucleus (in conjunction with the TCF/LEF-1 transcription factor). There it affects the transcription of a growing list of gene products that have the potential to affect cell growth and survival. Numerous human malignancies now demonstrate some potential for the involvement of ß-catenin anomalies in their development and progression including hepatocarcinoma, melanoma, colon cancer, ovarian cancer, breast cancer, gastric cancer, and endometrial carcinoma. There have been some reports previously that might place prostate cancer among this group. These include: (a) reports of a small percentage (
5%) of prostate cancers with mutations in the ß-catenin gene (26
, 28) ; (b) reports that the ß-catenin synergizes transcriptional regulation from the androgen receptor in prostate cancer cells (29
, 30)
and; more recently, (c) immunohistochemical evidence that advanced prostate cancers can have ß-catenin protein in the nucleus (12)
. Our work reported here continues to support a potential role for ß-catenin in prostate cancer, especially for the progression of this disease to the therapeutic-resistant state. This is evidenced by the drastic change in the intracellular localization of ß-catenin in prostate cancer cell lines that have been selected for the phenotype of apoptosis resistance. These cell lines, LNCaP-TR and LNCaP-SSR, have significant levels of ß-catenin protein in their cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions, in striking contrast to parental (apoptosis-sensitive) LNCaP cells in which ß-catenin is restricted to the membrane fraction. This anomalous localization corresponds with significantly increased transcription potential from ß-catenin/Tcf promoter elements in the apoptosis-resistant cells compared with the parental cells. There are several reports in the literature demonstrating that ß-catenin transcriptional-promoting activity induces apoptosis resistance, although it is not yet clear the precise mechanism through which this is exerted (12 , 31) . We have also considered the possibility that the process used in selecting the apoptosis-resistant cells may have also selected for cells with mutations in the ß-catenin gene, but our sequence analysis of the third exon of ß-catenin expressed in these cell lines (LNCaP, -TR and -SSR derivatives) showed only the wild-type sequence. It is also of note that the apoptosis-resistant variants of the LNCaP were shown previously to have selective expression of a novel protocadherin-family gene that we have termed protocadherin-PC. This protocadherin-family gene is unique in that it appears to be cytoplasmically localized rather than membrane-bound like other members of the protocadherin gene family (32) . Additionally, protocadherin-PC appears to retain a ß-catenin binding site, and we have proposed that protocadherin-PC might have some role in the anomalous distribution of the ß-catenin molecule in the apoptosis-resistant LNCaP cell variants (32) .
Our immunohistochemical analysis of actual human prostate cancer specimens also supports the recent finding of Chesire et al. (12)
that a fraction of prostate cancers have anomalous intracellular localization of ß-catenin, consistent with an abnormality in the ß-catenin processing pathway. This occurred with a frequency of
23% in a series of localized prostate cancers and with a frequency significantly higher (38.8%) in a group of hormone-refractory prostate cancer specimens. This observation is also consistent with the previous report of Chesire et al. (12
, 28)
in which they noted a higher frequency of nuclear ß-catenin in advanced prostate cancer specimens. Again, this observation is consistent with the possibility that anomalous signaling through ß-catenin in these cases is associated with the acquisition of an apoptosis-resistant tumor cell phenotype or therapeutic-resistance. Given our finding of a weak association between Gleasons grade in primary tumors and abnormal ß-catenin staining, it is also possible that the higher grades that are found consistently in hormone-refractory prostate cancers are the cause of this relationship. We consider it unlikely that this change in ß-catenin localization in (hormone-refractory) prostate cancers is the result of widespread mutation of the ß-catenin gene, because we were able to sequence ß-catenin exon-3 from 8 of the hormone-refractory prostate cancer specimens with abnormal nuclear ß-catenin accumulation, but these specimens also had only the wild-type sequence, supporting the previous demonstration of Chesire et al. (12)
that this occurs infrequently in prostate cancers.
In summary, our results here support the idea that signaling through ß-catenin plays some role in the progression of human prostate cancer, especially to the therapeutic-resistant state (acquisition of apoptosis-resistant phenotype and of HRPC status). This would place prostate cancer in a growing list of solid tissue malignancies of which the development or progression involves this critical protein. It also identifies the possibility that inhibitors of the ß-catenin signaling pathway might have use in the therapeutics of hormone refractory prostate cancer.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported by the National Cancer Institute Specialized Program in Research Excellence in Prostate Cancer (P50 CA69568), The Association pour la Recherche des Tumeurs Prostatiques 2002, and the United States Department of Defense Medical Research Program for Prostate Cancer (PC 001565). ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at EMI 99-09 Oncogenèse respiratoire et uro-génitale, Department of Urology, CHU Henri Mondor-Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris, 51 Avenue du Mal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94000 Créteil, France. Phone: 33-1-49-81-25-53; Fax: 33-1-49-81-25-52; E-mail: adelataille{at}hotmail.com ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: TR, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate-resistant; SSR, serum starvation-resistant; TPA, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate; ß-gal, ß-galactosidase; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; SM, surgical margin; SV, seminal vesicle; GS, Gleason score; HRPC, hormone refractory prostate cancer; PrCa, primary human prostate cancer. ![]()
Received 9/16/02; revised 1/ 8/03; accepted 1/15/03.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Saleem, I. Murtaza, R. S. Tarapore, Y. Suh, V. M. Adhami, J. J. Johnson, I. A. Siddiqui, N. Khan, M. Asim, B. B. Hafeez, et al. Lupeol inhibits proliferation of human prostate cancer cells by targeting {beta}-catenin signaling Carcinogenesis, May 1, 2009; 30(5): 808 - 817. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Mendiratta, E. Mostaghel, J. Guinney, A. K. Tewari, A. Porrello, W. T. Barry, P. S. Nelson, and P. G. Febbo Genomic Strategy for Targeting Therapy in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., April 20, 2009; 27(12): 2022 - 2029. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Assinder, Q. Dong, H. Mangs, and D. R. Richardson Pharmacological Targeting of the Integrated Protein Kinase B, Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog Deleted on Chromosome 10, and Transforming Growth Factor-{beta} Pathways in Prostate Cancer Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2009; 75(3): 429 - 436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Wang, J. Wang, and M. D. Sadar Crosstalk between the Androgen Receptor and {beta}-Catenin in Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer Cancer Res., December 1, 2008; 68(23): 9918 - 9927. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.-Y. Song, J.-H. Lee, M. Cho, B.-S. Park, D.-E. Kim, and S. Oh Decursin Suppresses Human Androgen-Independent PC3 Prostate Cancer Cell Proliferation by Promoting the Degradation of beta-Catenin Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2007; 72(6): 1599 - 1606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Shukla, G. T. MacLennan, C. A. Flask, P. Fu, A. Mishra, M. I. Resnick, and S. Gupta Blockade of {beta}-Catenin Signaling by Plant Flavonoid Apigenin Suppresses Prostate Carcinogenesis in TRAMP Mice Cancer Res., July 15, 2007; 67(14): 6925 - 6935. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-Y. Chen, G. Wulf, X. Z. Zhou, M. A. Rubin, K. P. Lu, and S. P. Balk Activation of {beta}-Catenin Signaling in Prostate Cancer by Peptidyl-Prolyl Isomerase Pin1-Mediated Abrogation of the Androgen Receptor-{beta}-Catenin Interaction Mol. Cell. Biol., February 1, 2006; 26(3): 929 - 939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Sun, H. Xiong, T. H. Kim, B. Ren, and Z. Zhang Positive Inter-Regulation between beta-Catenin/T Cell Factor-4 Signaling and Endothelin-1 Signaling Potentiates Proliferation and Survival of Prostate Cancer Cells Mol. Pharmacol., February 1, 2006; 69(2): 520 - 531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Zi, Y. Guo, A. R. Simoneau, C. Hope, J. Xie, R. F. Holcombe, and B. H. Hoang Expression of Frzb/Secreted Frizzled-Related Protein 3, a Secreted Wnt Antagonist, in Human Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer PC-3 Cells Suppresses Tumor Growth and Cellular Invasiveness Cancer Res., November 1, 2005; 65(21): 9762 - 9770. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Yang, M.-W. Chen, S. Terry, F. Vacherot, D. K. Chopin, D. L. Bemis, J. Kitajewski, M. C. Benson, Y. Guo, and R. Buttyan A Human- and Male-Specific Protocadherin that Acts through the Wnt Signaling Pathway to Induce Neuroendocrine Transdifferentiation of Prostate Cancer Cells Cancer Res., June 15, 2005; 65(12): 5263 - 5271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Lodygin, A. Epanchintsev, A. Menssen, J. Diebold, and H. Hermeking Functional Epigenomics Identifies Genes Frequently Silenced in Prostate Cancer Cancer Res., May 15, 2005; 65(10): 4218 - 4227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.A. LAWSON, L. XIN, R. LUKACS, Q. XU, D. CHENG, and O.N. WITTE Prostate Stem Cells and Prostate Cancer Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, January 1, 2005; 70(0): 187 - 196. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Zhu, M. Mazor, Y. Kawano, M. M. Walker, H. Y. Leung, K. Armstrong, J. Waxman, and R. M. Kypta Analysis of Wnt Gene Expression in Prostate Cancer: Mutual Inhibition by WNT11 and the Androgen Receptor Cancer Res., November 1, 2004; 64(21): 7918 - 7926. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Masiello, S.-Y. Chen, Y. Xu, M. C. Verhoeven, E. Choi, A. N. Hollenberg, and S. P. Balk Recruitment of {beta}-Catenin by Wild-Type or Mutant Androgen Receptors Correlates with Ligand-Stimulated Growth of Prostate Cancer Cells Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2004; 18(10): 2388 - 2401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. D Stein, T. Litman, T. Fojo, and S. E Bates A Serial Analysis of Gene Expression (SAGE) Database Analysis of Chemosensitivity: Comparing Solid Tumors with Cell Lines and Comparing Solid Tumors from Different Tissue Origins Cancer Res., April 15, 2004; 64(8): 2805 - 2816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Chesire, T. A. Dunn, C. M. Ewing, J. Luo, and W. B. Isaacs Identification of Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor as a Putative Wnt/{beta}-Catenin Pathway Target Gene in Prostate Cancer Cells Cancer Res., April 1, 2004; 64(7): 2523 - 2533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |