| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Experimental Therapeutics, Preclinical Pharmacology |
Foundation Callerio-Onlus, Trieste [G. S., C. T., F. V., M. C., A. B.]; Departments of Biomedical Sciences [G. S., S. Z.] and Physiology and Pathology [F. V., M. S., G. Z.], University of Trieste, Trieste; Novuspharma, Milano [S. D., G. P.]; and Department of Experimental Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova [L. S., S. G.], Italy
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
NAMI-A has repeatedly been shown to inhibit metastasis formation through a mechanism unrelated to conventional cell cytotoxicity (7 , 8) . Experimental evidence confirms NAMI-A as one of the new agents effective on specific determinants of tumor malignancy, such as angiogenesis, matrix metalloproteinases, and mitogen-activated pathways (9, 10, 11) . However, data available do not explain which of these determinants is the primary target of the activity of NAMI-A. Nor can we say whether the effects reported are secondary to other types of interaction, because of the complex molecular biological network that links these three determinants and significant influences that may derive from disturbance of any of the steps of tumor malignancy (12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17) .
In fact, NAMI-A shows metastasis inhibition in all of the experimental models of solid tumor under test, and metastases are inhibited independently of their stage of growth and despite the effectiveness at primary tumor site (18 , 19) . NAMI-A is active on lung metastases also when it is dosed by the p.o. route (20) . Although the in vitro effects of NAMI-A on tumor invasion and angiogenesis may explain the in vivo effects of this compound on the extracellular matrix at primary tumor site (21) , nothing can be said as yet to substantiate the efficacy of NAMI-A on advanced lung metastases in mice with late treatments (18) or treated after surgical removal of the primary tumor.3
We therefore studied the interactions of NAMI-A with lung tissue components and primary tumor cells to help clarify the mechanisms of metastasis inhibition. In particular, we investigated the change of malignancy of tumor cells, after in vivo exposure to NAMI-A, by repeated passages in healthy untreated mice, the inhibition of Matrigel invasion of tumor cells briefly exposed to NAMI-A, and the ultrastructural distribution of NAMI-A in lung and kidney by TEM.4
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell Cultures.
The TS/A adenocarcinoma cell line was kindly supplied by the group of G. Forni (Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Centro di Immunogenetica ed Oncologia Sperimentale, Torino, Italy). Vials of the original line were held in liquid N2. The cell line was maintained in RPMI 1640 (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) supplemented with 10% FBS (HyClone Europe, Milan, Italy), 2 mM L-glutamine (HyClone Europe), and 50 µg/ml Gentamicin Sulfate solution (Irvine Scientific, Santa Anna, CA). For experimental purposes, the cells were sown directly onto plastic plates.
Proliferation Assays.
TS/A cells were plated in 6-well plates at day 0 and treated at day 1 with 1, 10, and 100 µM NAMI-A in complete medium for 1, 16, or 72 h. In this latter case, the treatment was applied once for 72 h or renewed daily. At the end of drug challenge, cells were collected by centrifugation, and total cells recovered were counted using the trypan blue exclusion test.
Invasive Potential of TS/A Cells.
Invasive ability was measured in a transwell cell culture chamber (Costar, Milan, Italy) according to the method of Albini et al. (22)
; the bottom surface of a polyvinylpyrrolidone-free polycarbonate filter (6.5-mm diameter and 8-µm pore size) was coated with 30 µg/50 µl Matrigel (Becton Dickinson, Bedford, MA) and air dried overnight at room temperature. The filters were reconstituted with RPMI 1640 immediately before use. TS/A adenocarcinoma cell line, pretreated for 1 h with NAMI-A (0.1 mM in PBS), was treated with trypsine, collected by centrifugation, resuspended in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS, and sown in triplicate in the top compartment chamber (1 x 105 cells/100 µl). The bottom compartment was filled with RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 50 µg/ml Gentamicin Sulfate solution. Invasion was scored after 72 or 96 h of incubation in a humidified CO2 incubator at 37°C. After incubation, the filters were fixed with methanol (-20°C) and stained with H&E. The cells on the top surface of the filter were removed using a cotton swab. Tumor cells that had migrated from the top to the bottom side of the filter were counted by light microscopy at 400 magnification. The invasion was expressed as a percentage of total invasion compared with the original number of cells sown on day 0, calculated by the following formula: [Total number of invading cells (bottom well sample)]/[Total number of sown cells (top well sample)] x 100. For each experiment, cells in
3 wells were counted.
MMP-2 and MMP-9 Gelatin-Zymography and Activity.
To visualize the direct effect of NAMI-A on enzymes MMP-2 and MMP-9, SDS-PAGE gelatin-zymography was carried out using gelatinase-containing medium conditioned by neuroblastoma SK-N-BE and fibrosarcoma HT-1080 cells. At the end of electrophoresis, the gels were cut into strips and incubated with different concentrations of NAMI-A (06 mM) for 30 min at 4°C and then for 18 h at 37°C. EDTA 10 mM was used as negative control. The gel strips were then stained with 0.5% Coomassie brilliant blue. The gelatinolytic regions were observed as white bands against a blue background. MMP activity was measured by scoring the intensity of bands by computerized image analysis (Apple Computer, Inc., Cupertino, CA).
In Vivo Effects on Solid Tumors.
Lewis lung carcinoma was grown in BD2F1 female mice purchased from Harlan-Nossan (San Pietro al Natisone, Italy). The Lewis lung carcinoma line used was originally obtained from the Tumor Depository Bank, NCI, NIH (Bethesda, MD), and was locally maintained in C57Bl/6 mice by serially biweekly passages according to relevant NCI protocols: 106 tumor cells of a single cell suspension, prepared by mincing with scissors the primary tumors from donors similarly implanted 2 weeks previously, were injected i.m. into the left hind calf of experimental groups. The minced tissue was filtered through a double layer of sterile gauze, centrifuged at 200 x g for 10 min, and resuspended in an equal volume of PBS; viable cells were counted by the trypan blue exclusion test.
MCa mammary carcinoma was grown in female CBA mice purchased from Harlan-Nossan. The line of MCa mammary carcinoma used was originally obtained from the Department of Biology, Rudjer Boskovich Institute of Zagreb, Croatia. The procedures for tumor graft and transplantation were those used for Lewis lung carcinoma.
For both Lewis lung carcinoma and MCa mammary carcinoma, primary tumor growth was measured using calipers to determine two orthogonal axes; tumor volume is given by the formula: (
/6) x a2 x b, where a is the shorter axis, and b is the longer axis, assuming tumor density equal to 1. Lung metastases were counted by examining lung surface immediately after killing of the animals by cervical dislocation. Lungs were dissected into the five lobes (lobus sinister, lobus cranialis dexter, lobus medius dexter, lobus caudalis dexter, and lobus accessorius), washed with PBS, and examined under a low-power microscope equipped with a calibrated grid. The weight of each metastasis was calculated by applying the same formula used for primary tumors; the sum of individual weights gives the total weight of metastatic tumor per animal.
The human lung cancer cell line H460M2, selected for its high lung colonization potential, was provided by the NCI of Milan (G. Pratesi). The tumor cell line is routinely cultured in RPMI 1640 (Bio-Whittaker Europe, Parc Industriel de Petit Rechain, Belgium) supplemented with 10% FBS (Life Technologies, Inc., Invitrogen, San Giuliano Milanese, Italy), 2% HEPES buffer, and 1% 200 mM L-glutamine (Bio-Whittaker Europe) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air. Tumor cells (3 x 106 in 50 µl of PBS) were injected into the footpad of 5-week-old male SCID CB.17 mice (2022 grams; Harlan, Correzzana MI, Italy), and the primary tumor was surgically removed on day 22 after inoculum; the mass was
600 mg, as determined by caliper measurement. Before surgery, mice were anesthetized by s.c. administration of an anesthetic mixture (10 ml/kg bodyweight) containing 13.6 mg/kg b.w. Ketamine (Ketavet, Parke-Davis) and 17 mg/kg b.w. Xylazine (Rompun, Bayer AG).
After skin incision and removal up to the pelvic region, the visible femoral artery and vein were ligated. The primary tumor of the hind footpad and popliteal lymph nodes were resected by amputation of the extremity (above knee amputation). After renewed disinfection of the surgical area, the lips of the wound were carefully brought together (skin edge approximation) to cover the amputation stump fully. Finally, the incision was closed using two wound clamps. The number and size of lung metastases on the entire lung surface were determined by morphometric analysis of the lung lobes using image analysis software. The fixed lungs were cleaned from connective tissue and split into five separate lobes. Two digital pictures of the five lobes arranged on a glass plate were then taken from above and below. Using Image Plus 4.0 (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD) software, the average diameter of each metastasis was marked manually. Assuming that metastases grow roughly spherical, the volume of each metastasis was calculated using the formula: V = (
/6) x diameter3
.
TEM Analysis.
Specimens of lung and kidney were processed for ultrastructure studies. Tissue blocks were promptly fixed in a solution of 3% glutaraldehyde (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany) in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.3) for 3 h at 4°C, rinsed three times (10 min each wash) in the same buffer, and postfixed in 1% OsO4 for 1 h at 4°C. The samples were then dehydrated in graded ethanols and embedded in Dow Epoxy Resin 332 (23)
. Ultrathin sections were cut using an ultratome Leica Ultracut UCT8 (Leica, Mikrosysteme Aktiengesellschaft, Wien, Austria), double stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate (24)
, and examined with a Phillips EM 208 transmission electron microscope.
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy.
A small portion of each specimen was weighed and dried overnight at 80°C and completed at 105°C in Nalgene cryovials. Tissue decomposition was facilitated by the addition of an aliquot of tetramethylammoniumhydroxide (25% in water; Aldrich Chimica, Gallarate, Milano, Italy) and milliQ water at a ratio of 1:1 directly in each vial at room temperature and under shaking (modified from Ref. 25
). The final volumes were adjusted to 1 ml with milliQ water. The concentration of ruthenium was measured in triplicate using a Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometer, model SpectrAA-300, supplied with a specific ruthenium emission lamp (hollow cathode lamp P/N 56101447-00; Varian, Mulgrave, Victoria, Australia). To correct for possible deterioration of the graphite furnace during a daily working session, a reslope standard was measured every six samples. Changes in the readings of this standard are included in the calculation of the NAMI-A concentration of the samples. If the values of two subsequent reslope readings deviated by >20%, then the graphite furnace was replaced. The lower and higher limits of quantitation were set at the levels corresponding to the lower and higher standard concentrations, respectively. The limit of detection was estimated according to the EURACHEM guide, "the fitness for purpose of analytical methods." Lower limit quantitation, higher limit quantitation, and limit of detection were, respectively: 12.5, 200, and
10 ng x Ru x ml-1 of sample. The quantification of ruthenium was carried out in 10-µl samples at 349.9 nm with an atomizing temperature of 2500°C, using argon as carrier gas at a flow rate of 3 l min-1. Additional details concerning the furnace parameter settings are reported in Cocchietto et al. (26)
. Before each daily analysis session, a five-point calibration curve was obtained using Ruthenium Custom-Grade Standard 998 µg ml-1 (Inorganic Ventures, Inc., St. Louis, MO).
Animal Studies.
Animal studies were carried out according to guidelines in force in Italy (DDL 116 of 21/2/1992 and subsequent addenda) and in compliance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Department of Health and Human Services Publ. No. 86-23, Bethesda, MD, NIH, 1985).
Statistical Analysis.
Experimental data were subjected to computer-assisted statistical analysis using ANOVA, Tukey-Kramer post-test, and nonparametric Mann-Whitney test. Differences of P < 0.05 were considered to be significantly different from controls.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
3540% of untreated controls at 80 and 120 µM NAMI-A concentrations.
|
|
80% of the secreted gelatinases.
|
|
|
|
|
180 h; for comparison, the release of compound from the primary tumor is significantly faster, the period being equivalent to
24 h (Fig. 8)
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Metastases are reduced because NAMI-A acts primarily on tumor cells endowed with metastatic ability. The marked reduction of metastatic capacity of tumor cell suspensions, prepared from primary tumors obtained from mice treated with NAMI-A, indicates that cells endowed with metastatic ability are effectively removed from these suspensions; our study shows that this effect is maintained for two transplant generations free of treatment. This effect seems not to be attributable to chemical xenogenization of tumor cells (27 , 28) , unless we consider that only metastatic cells undergo this epigenetic change. Previous studies showed NAMI, the precursor of NAMI-A, to progressively reduce to zero the metastatic ability of primary tumors repeatedly treated for up to seven transplant generations with no appreciable modification of primary tumor growth (29) . It thus appears that NAMI-A modifies the heterogeneity of tumor cell population in the primary tumor by eliminating those with the highest metastatic ability. The removal of only the metastatic cells from the primary tumor may explain the modest activity of NAMI-A at primary tumor level, where these cells often represent a small fraction (30) , considering that also host-infiltrating cells appear to be resistant to NAMI-A cytotoxicity (31) .
Metastases thus appear to be a privileged target for NAMI-A, a conclusion supported by the particular efficacy of this compound in the lung, where the tumors tested usually metastasize. NAMI-A reaches a significant concentration in the lung and has a favorable half lifetime of elimination about five times longer than that from the primary tumor. The slow release of NAMI-A from the lung is attributed to its binding to extracellular matrix collagen, as demonstrated by electron microscopy examination. We believe that the in vitro test on invasion, using Matrigel pretreated with NAMI-A, demonstrates that NAMI-A, once bound to collagen, maintains its pharmacological activity on metastases. The increased deposition of fibrillar collagen around metastases and the binding of NAMI-A to this collagen allow speculation on the high possibility of a metastatic tumor cell being affected by NAMI-A in the lungs as compared with the primary tumor. Moreover, if metastatic cells are a target for NAMI-A in preference to any other primary tumor cell, we must emphasize that only these cells are present in the lung, because metastases have a clonal origin (30) . Thus, the reduction of lung metastases, significantly higher than that of the primary tumor, is the logical consequence and commonly found in mice with solid metastasizing tumors.
The activity of NAMI-A bound to collagen also allows conclusions to be drawn on the in vivo effect of this compound on MMPs, because in vitro tests showed inhibitory activity only at micromolar concentrations. NAMI-A shows an equal propensity to bind to fibrillar type III collagen of the lung or basement membrane collagen type IV. Therefore, it is not surprising that a migrating metastatic cell, in the microenvironment in which it makes contact with the extracellular matrix (e.g., the basement membrane), may find NAMI-A at relatively high (micromolar) concentration, e.g., the NAMI-A concentration in the lungs at the end of an administration cycle of doses active on metastases is around 0.20.4 mM (Refs. 18 and 19 and present study). Measurement of the level of collagen-bound compound alone would probably reveal concentrations 510-fold higher in this specific microenvironment, although collagen is only a minor constituent of lung tissue. This could account for the eventual effect against MMP-2 and MMP-9; the direct inhibition of both release and activity of these gelatinases could lie behind the anti-invasive and antiangiogenic effect of NAMI-A (9 , 32) .
Spontaneous Matrigel invasion by tumor cells is restrained by 0.050.1 mM NAMI-A, concentrations that are nontoxic even after 72 h but also much lower than the IC50 for gelatinases (33) ; this evidence reinforces the idea that NAMI-A accumulation on gelatinase substrate (collagen) is crucial to the effectiveness against gelatinase activity.
The binding of NAMI-A to extracellular collagen and the consequent slow release from the lung may explain the equivalence of the antimetastatic effects for a number of different daily doses and treatment schedules used. Similarly, the peak of dose used may explain the weak effect at primary tumor site where a lower amount of collagen is present, the half lifetime is shorter, and, therefore, only a short exposure of tumor cells to NAMI-A is ensured. Provided that: (a) the tissue distribution of NAMI-A is not influenced by the dose administered; (b) the compound is rapidly removed from the peritoneal cavity (18) and quickly distributed to all organs and tissues (26) ; and (c) the rate of elimination from the tissues depends on collagen binding; then tissue concentration of NAMI-A is strictly related to the administered dose. In fact, in an experiment in which NAMI-A was given at three different doses, its lung concentration increased linearly with increases in daily dose (18 , 34) . Therefore, the difference between single administrations and repeated treatments is null in terms of efficacy, in that under both conditions, the goal of providing a suitable amount of NAMI-A for a time long enough to inhibit metastasis growth is reached.
Because the main toxicity detected for NAMI-A is the renal toxicity (7) , which seems at least in part reversible (7 , 34) , it would be interesting to evaluate whether a single dose, repeated with a long drug-free interval, would provide a therapeutic index more favorable than that of the classic cycle of 6-day treatment often used. What is probably certain is that it would provide a better compliance for treating human metastases, considering that this "drug" has a greater tendency to control and stabilize the disease than to remove it with a conventional cytotoxic effect and therefore needs rather long treatment periods.
In conclusion, we demonstrate that the antimetastatic activity of NAMI-A is caused by the selectivity of action for the metastatic cell and depends on its binding to collagen, which preserves it from elimination and gives it prolonged contact with the metastatic cells in the lungs. Considering that lung metastases are common features of many human tumors, NAMI-A may represent a new and effective tool for treating them. Laboratory proof is given by the effectiveness of NAMI-A on the H460M2 human lung tumor; the i.p. treatment of the human lung tumor H460M2 xenotransplanted into the SCID mouse with 35 mg/kg/day for six consecutive days resulted in a statistically significant reduction of lung metastasis growth, independently of whether the compound was given before or after surgical removal of the primary tumor (Table 2)
. Data obtained with this human tumor line are in perfect agreement with the present discussion and past results, and therefore, as in the case of other treatments of mouse transplantable tumors, NAMI-A was also free of significant effects on primary tumor growth when given before surgery.
|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported with contributions from the Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Ministry of Education and Research, in the framework of the project pharmacological mechanisms of the antimetastatic activity of metal-based drugs, Laboratory for Investigating New Antimetastasis Drugs laboratory, and within the European Co-operation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research D20/00005/01 Project. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Fnd Callerio-Onlus, via A. Fleming 22-31, 34127 Trieste, Italy. Phone and Fax: 39 (040) 569934; E-mail: gsava{at}fcmail.univ.trieste.it ![]()
4 The abbreviations used are: TEM, transmission electron microscopy; FBS, fetal bovine serum; SCID, severe combined immunodeficiency; NCI, National Cancer Institute. ![]()
Received 10/16/02; revised 1/20/03; accepted 1/22/03.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Gava, S. Zorzet, P. Spessotto, M. Cocchietto, and G. Sava Inhibition of B16 Melanoma Metastases with the Ruthenium Complex Imidazolium trans-Imidazoledimethylsulfoxide-tetrachlororuthenate and Down-Regulation of Tumor Cell Invasion J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2006; 317(1): 284 - 291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Frausin, V. Scarcia, M. Cocchietto, A. Furlani, B. Serli, E. Alessio, and G. Sava Free Exchange across Cells, and Echistatin-Sensitive Membrane Target for the Metastasis Inhibitor NAMI-A (Imidazolium trans-Imidazole Dimethyl Sulfoxide Tetrachlororuthenate) on KB Tumor Cells J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2005; 313(1): 227 - 233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Pacor, S. Zorzet, M. Cocchietto, M. Bacac, M. Vadori, C. Turrin, B. Gava, A. Castellarin, and G. Sava Intratumoral NAMI-A Treatment Triggers Metastasis Reduction, Which Correlates to CD44 Regulation and Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocyte Recruitment J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., August 1, 2004; 310(2): 737 - 744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |