This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zhang, Z.-W. Articles by Holly, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zhang, Z.-W. Articles by Holly, J.

Age-associated Increase of Codon 72 Arginine p53 Frequency in Gastric Cardia and Non-Cardia Adenocarcinoma

Division of Surgery [Z-W. Z., P. N., A. H., D. A., J. H.] and Department of Histopathology [M. M.], Bristol Royal Infirmary, University of Bristol, Bristol BS2 8HW; Department of Histopathology [R. F.] and Cancer Research UK; Skin Tumour Laboratory, Centre for Cutaneous Research [A. S.], St. Bartholomew’s and the Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London E1 2AD; and Faculty of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, [M. J. G. F.], United Kingdom

	ABSTRACT

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Purpose: A common polymorphism of the tumor suppressor gene TP53 at codon 72 has been associated with human cancer susceptibility and prognosis. To examine the role of the polymorphism in the gastric adenocarcinoma, we examined 397 patients with or without the cancer.

Experimental Design: DNA samples were extracted from archived gastric tumor tissues and/or normal tissues of gastric adenocarcinoma and noncancer patients. The TP53 codon 72 genotypes were determined by PCR-RFLP.

Results: The overall genotype frequencies for Pro/Pro, Arg/Pro, and Arg/Arg were 7.3, 45.1, and 47.6%, respectively. A significant stepwise increased frequency of codon 72 Arg p53 with age was observed in patients with gastric cancer, but not in noncancer patients (P = 0.01). Patients with gastric cardia cancer had a significantly higher frequency of homozygous Arg allele than those with non-cardia tumors (P = 0.03) or than noncancer patients. After adjustment for age and gender, a logistic regression analysis suggested that the risk for a p53 Arg homozygous patient to develop cardia cancer is 3.1 95% confidence interval, 1.4–7.3) times greater than for p53 Pro homozygous and p53 Arg/Pro heterozygous patients. No close relationship was observed among patient gender, tumor histological type, p53 protein expression, and codon 72 genotype distribution.

Conclusions: These findings indicate that codon 72 Arg p53 may be associated with a prolonged survival for patients who have had gastric adenocarcinoma, especially non-cardia adenocarcinoma. It may confer, however, a different role on patients who suffer cardia gastric adenocarcinoma.

	INTRODUCTION

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
A common polymorphism of the tumor suppressor gene TP53 at codon 72 has been associated with human cancer susceptibility (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) . The polymorphism results in either a variant protein with a Pro residue (CCC) or an Arg residue (CGC; Refs. 7 and 8 ). There are a number of differences between the p53 variants in their ability to bind components of the transcriptional machinery, to activate transcription, to induce apoptosis, and to repress the transformation of primary cells (9) . Patients with the Pro/Pro genotype, especially patients who were smokers, were more likely to develop lung cancer than those with other genotypes (10, 11, 12) . In contrast, nonsmokers with lung cancer have an increased frequency of the homozygous Arg genotype (1 , 4) . Increased frequency of the Pro allele (Pro/Pro or Arg/Pro genotypes) was also found in patients with breast cancer (5) . Although controversial findings are reported on the relationship between the polymorphism and cervical cancer (13 , 14) , in vitro study suggested that the Arg form of p53 was significantly more susceptible to the E6 oncoprotein (derived from tumor-associated human papillomaviruses)-mediated degradation than was the Pro form (13) . Thus, p53 variants may serve as risk factors for major human neoplasms and may play a role in modulating environmental risk factors for cancer.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. Although the overall incidence of distal (non-cardia) gastric cancer has been decreasing over the past few decades, the incidence of adenocarcinomas of the proximal stomach (cardia) and esophagogastric junction is rising (15, 16, 17, 18) . Non-cardia gastric cancers have different risk factors and anatomical precursor lesions compared with tumors arising in the cardia. Chronic Helicobacter pylori infection and dietary factors, such as those high in salt or nitrate, and nutritional deficiencies have been associated with non-cardia gastric cancer (19) . In contrast, cancer of the cardia, which is increasing in incidence, is most likely to be associated with gastroesophageal reflux (16) . Gastric carcinogenesis is a complex, multistep, and multifactorial process, in which many factors are implicated. The majority of gastric cancers are thought to be caused by environmental factors that result in damage to the mucosa and that inhibit its ability to repair itself (20) . This response is regulated, in part, by inhibitory and stimulatory factors that are products of proto-oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes (21) . TP53, an important tumor suppressor gene, has been widely studied in gastric cancers (22) . However, although more than 75% of gastric cancers showed p53 overexpression, less than 30% had mutations in this gene. The codon 72 polymorphism is located in exon 4 of the p53 gene, a region involving very few mutations (23) . However, the different codon 72 genotypes may respond variably to gastric carcinogens. Therefore, one genotype may bear more risk of developing cancer compared with the others; there are very few studies, however, on TP53 polymorphisms and gastric cancer. Shepherd et al. (23) examined the relationship between codon 72 polymorphisms and their susceptibilities to gastric cancer in a group of American gastric cancer patients. They noticed a higher frequency of Arg homozygotes for patients with gastric cardia cancer compared with those with cancer in the antrum or corpus. In the present study, we examined the genotype frequency of codon 72 in gastric cancer patients and noncancer controls in a group of Caucasian subjects in England using PCR-based genotyping methods to further evaluate the possible relevance of this polymorphism to gastric cancer.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Specimens.
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded gastric tissue samples were selected consecutively from the archival tissue banks in the Departments of Histopathology at Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, and at St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom. A total of 397 specimens (120 gastric cancer cases and 277 noncancer controls, the latter consisting of patients with benign upper gastrointestinal disorders including chronic gastritis and peptic ulceration) were obtained. They were from Caucasian patients who had undergone endoscopy or gastrectomy between January 1997 and October 2000 at Bristol Royal Infirmary and between November 1992 and April 1995 at St. Bartholomew’s Hospital. Clinical data including diagnosis, race, age, and gender of each patient were obtained from patient records and endoscopy and histology reports. The classification of cardia and non-cardia gastric cancer was formed based on International Classification of Diseases for Oncology codes (24) . Patients were excluded from the study if they had severe systemic diseases or cancers of other systems. All of the histological diagnoses were reassessed on original H&E slides by two pathologists (R. F. and M. M.) who were blinded to clinical details and research outcome. This study was approved by the research ethics committees of The United Bristol Healthcare National Health Service (NHS) Trust and of East London and The City NHS Health Authority.

DNA Extraction.
Gastric tissue blocks from noncancer subjects, gastric tumor tissue, and some well-separated normal tissue blocks from cancer patients were used for genomic DNA preparation. Sections cut from each tissue block (10-µm thick) were kept in a sterilized 1.5-ml Eppendorf tube. The blade was cleaned with ethanol between samples to eliminate possible cross-contamination of sample DNA. The content of the Eppendorf tube was deparaffinized in two serial washes of Clearene (Surgipath Europe, Ltd., Peterborough, United Kingdom) and two washes in ethanol. After air-drying, the DNA was extracted using QIAamp DNA mini kit (Qiagen, West Susses, Crawley, United Kingdom) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Analysis of TP53 Codon 72 Polymorphism.
PCR reaction mixture (25 µl) consisted of 2.5 µl of template DNA solution, 0.2 µM each outer oligonucleotide primer (forward, 5'-GCT CTT TTC ACC CAT CTA CAG-3'; reverse, 5'-TGA AGT CTC ATG GAA GCC AGC-3'), 200 µM each dNTP (Life Technologies, Inc. Ltd., Paisley, United Kingdom), 1.5 µM MgCl₂, 2.5 µl of PCR buffer, and 2.5 units of Tag DNA polymerase (Life Technologies, Inc. Ltd.). The PCR amplification consisted of an initial 2-min incubation at 94°C, followed by 35 cycles of denaturing at 94°C for 30 s and annealing at 58°C for 30 s, with an extension at 72°C for 1 min. The reaction was terminated after a final extension of 5 min at 72°C. An additional PCR amplification reaction using inner oligonucleotide primers (forward, 5'-TCC CCC TTG CCG TCC CAA-3'; reverse, CGT GCA AGT CAC AGA CTT-3') was carried out using 2.5 µl of the 1-in-250-diluted first-round PCR product under the same conditions as for the first-round PCR reaction. Twenty-five µl of second round PCR product (279 bp) were digested overnight in a final volume of 30 µl using 10 units of BstUI restriction enzyme under the conditions recommended by the supplier (New England Biolabs Inc., Hitchin, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom). The restriction enzyme digests within the sequence corresponding to the Arg codon (CGC) at position 72 to generate two visible fragments of 160 bp and 119 bp and leaves the Pro allele uncut. The DNA fragments were then resolved by electrophoresis in 3% agarose, and the gels were stained with ethidium bromide. The positive control to confirm digestion of the PCR products was heterozygous DNA. The negative control was a complete PCR reaction mixture-omitting template DNA, to exclude the possibility of cross-contamination during sample preparation. The genotypes of more than 10% samples were reassessed to confirm the results. The DNA sequencing was performed on selected PCR products to further confirm the authenticity of the genotype analysis. In addition, we performed a genotyping assay of 36 cancer patients using DNA from well-separated normal tissues and gastric tumor tissues from the same patients. We found an identical genotype for all of the patients analyzed.

Immunohistochemistry.
The p53 protein expression was evaluated immunohistochemically (25) . The p53 antibody, which recognizes both mutant and wild-type p53, was obtained from Nova-Castra (Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom). There were samples from 77 tumor tissues and 70 adjacent noninvolved tissues available for the assessment. A combined qualitative and quantitative approach, H score, was used to assess both the intensity and the percentage of positive cells. Twenty % of the cases were re-evaluated in a blinded fashion to guarantee the reproducibility.

Statistical Analyses.
Frequency tables were constructed using the SPSS (standard version, March 2001) statistical package with statistical significance using the ² test. The odd ratios and 95% CIs² were calculated as an approximation of relative risk and adjusted for confounding factors such as age and gender using a logistic regression model. We also calculated the frequencies of codon 72 genotypes for three age groups (<65, 65–74, and 75+ years) according to previous epidemiological data (16) .

	RESULTS

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Gastric cancer patients, with mean age of 75 ± 13, were significantly older than noncancer patients (61 ± 17; P < 0.0001). Male patients were overrepresented in the gastric cancer group (60.8%) when compared with those in the noncancer group (49.8%; ² = 4.; df, 1; P = 0.04). The antral mucosal histology was assessed in the noncancer group. Thirty-eight % (96 of 254) of them had atrophy and 15% (38 of 254) had intestinal metaplasia. No dysplasia or other precancerous lesions were observed. The overall genotype frequencies for Pro/Pro, Arg/Pro, and Arg/Arg were 7.3, 45.1, and 47.6%, respectively, and fitted the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium with the allele frequencies of 0.7 (Arg) and 0.3 (Pro). The genotype distribution was similar in men and women (² = 3.3; df, 2; P = 0.2). The presence of Arg homozygous allele was strongly associated with age in gastric cancer patients (P = 0.008). As shown in Fig. 1 , whereas the frequency of Arg/Arg allele in noncancer patients had no significant correlation with age (P = 0.96), a stepwise increase of Arg/Arg in gastric cancer patients was observed (P = 0.01). The age-associated increase in Arg/Arg genotype distribution was evident in both cardia and non-cardia gastric cancer groups; but it did not reach statistical significance in cardia groups (P = 0.06), which may be attributable to the limited patient number in each subgroup (Table 1) .

View larger version (15K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Fig. 1. Patient age and the prevalence of p53 codon 72 genotypes. The frequency of arginine homozygotes in gastric cancer patients increased with age (P = 0.01) but did not increase in noncancer patients (P = 0.96).

	DISCUSSION

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
We have observed a strong correlation between the distribution of TP53 codon 72 genotypes and patient age in the gastric cancer group, but not in noncancer patients. The frequency of the homozygous Arg allele in cardia cancer was significantly higher than that in non-cardia gastric cancer or noncancer patients.

There have been studies examining the relationship between codon 72 variants and age in healthy subjects (26) . Bonafe et al. (26) studied 611 healthy younger controls and 394 centenarians to assess the role of p53 variants on survival and longevity, but they found that the distribution pattern of codon 72 genotypes had no significant difference between the controls and the centenarians. This is consistent with our findings and suggests that the p53 variants are not associated with aging in healthy populations. The relationship between age and codon 72 in cancer patients has not been reported. Kawajiri et al. (12) studied 347 healthy controls and 140 gastric cancer patients in a Japanese population and found that the genotype distribution among gastric cancer patients was significantly different from healthy controls, with 48.6 Arg/Arg and 3.6% Pro/Pro in gastric cancer compared with 41.5 and 10.9% in healthy controls (² = 7.3; df, 2; P = 0.03). A more recent study in gastric cancer patients alone showed that Arg/Arg genotype occurred in 72% of the cardia tumors, compared with a 47% occurrence of the antral tumors and 56% of the corpus tumors (P = 0.067; 23 ). Unfortunately, neither of these studies assessed the age-associated changes regarding codon 72 genotype distribution. However, the relationship between codon 72 genotype and patient age have been reported in some previous studies on lung cancer patients (1 , 11 , 27) . Wang et al. (11) studied 194 lung cancer patients and 152 noncancer controls. They found that patients with Pro/Pro genotype had an odds ratio of 2.63 (95% CI, 1.22–5.68; P = 0.01) higher than those with the other genotypes to be diagnosed with lung cancer at earlier ages. Although they did not mention the association of patient age and Arg/Arg genotype distribution, it was evident from their data that Arg/Arg genotype occurred in 40% of 150 cancer cases who aged 60 or over, compared with 27.8% of 36 who were less than 60. In contrast, in noncancer controls, there were 29.5% of 112 and 35% of 40 for those aged 60 or over and those younger than 60, respectively.

The mechanisms which lead to the age-associated increase of codon 72 Arg p53 in gastric adenocarcinoma are not clear. The preferential retention of codon 72 Arg p53 has been reported in squamous cell carcinoma (28 , 29) and this could lead to an increased frequency of Arg allele in cancer patients. Data from current study, however, do not support this mechanism. The increased frequency of codon 72 Arg p53 was only associated with patient age and there was no difference between gastric cancer and noncancer patients. We compared the genotypes of 36 cancer patients using DNA from well-separated normal tissues and gastric tumor tissues of same patients and found an identical genotype for all of the patients analyzed. Furthermore, previous studies also showed that loss of heterozygosity (LOH) play little role in determining the pattern of codon 72 genotype in patients with adenocarcinoma (11 , 23) .

The most interesting explanation for the results reported is that the codon 72 Arg p53 acts as a survival factor in gastric cancer patients or those who have homozygous Arg allele confer a late start of gastric cancer when compared with those with Pro allele (proline homozygotes or Pro/Arg heterozygotes). Several lines of evidence support this. Firstly, the biochemical properties of the codon 72 variants are different. It has been shown that the Arg/Arg and Pro/Pro variants differ in their ability to bind components of the transcriptional machinery, to activate transcription, to induce apoptosis, and to repress the transformation of primary cells (9) . The p53 Arg/Arg variant induces apoptosis with faster kinetics and suppresses transformation more efficiently than the p53 Pro/Pro variant. The p53 Arg/Arg variant is a better inducer of transcription because of its stronger affinity for the TAFII32 and TAFII70 transcription factors (9) . One might postulate that the presence of the Pro allele, which does not induce apoptosis as effectively as the Arg allele, will be associated with therapeutic resistance and poor prognosis. It is indeed, as reported in a previous study, that lung cancer patients with the Pro/Pro genotype had a worse prognosis than those with the Arg/Pro genotype (6 , 11) . Furthermore, the natural history of gastric cancer development also supports the role of Arg/Arg genotype in gastric cancer patient survival. Early gastric cancer is usually diagnosed at about 60 years of age (30) , and it takes approximately 8 more years to develop advanced gastric cancer (31 , 32) . With no treatment, 90% of advanced gastric cancer patients will die within 1 year after diagnosis. Even with treatment, the prognosis is still poor, and the available data suggest only 8% will survive 5 years (33) . Thus, the majority of gastric cancer patients will probably die by age 73. This calculation may not be entirely true in England; but similar data were reported from the United States, where most deaths attributable to gastric cancer occur between the ages of 65 and 84 for all races, with a median age at death of 72 years for white males and 77 for white females (34) . In the current study, we observed a dramatically increased frequency of Arg/Arg genotype in cancer patients at age 75 or more, for which the percentage of Arg/Arg genotype was twice that in cancer patients in the younger age group and in all of the noncancer controls. This may further indicate that the prognosis in patients with Pro allele was worse than that in those with Arg/Arg genotype or else that the latter have a late onset of gastric cancer. However, a well-designed follow-up study is needed to confirm this. Finally, in situ cancer of the cervix often fails to progress (35) , and as many as 70% of breast neoplasms never develop into a clinically relevant disease (36) . Premalignant colonic polyps have a long gestation period before showing invasive tendencies. Therefore, it is not surprising that there is a subtype of early gastric cancer that does not progress or else progresses so slowly that, even over a prolonged period, it does not become invasive (37) .

Another possible explanation for the current results is that the codon 72 Arg p53 may be associated with an increased susceptibility of gastric cancer, particularly gastric cardia adenocarcinoma. We noticed a marked difference in the distribution pattern of codon 72 allelotypes between gastric cardia and non-cardia adenocarcinoma, with a significantly increased frequency of codon 72 Arg p53 in patients with cardia adenocarcinoma. A similar trend was reported in a recent study (23) . We also found that patients with cardia adenocarcinoma had a significantly higher frequency of the Arg/Arg allelotype than did patients without cancer, but a difference was not seen between non-cardia adenocarcinoma and noncancer patients. These findings suggest that codon 72 Arg p53 may be associated with an increased risk of cardia adenocarcinoma. Adenocarcinoma arising from the gastric cardia carries risk factors that are similar to those of esophageal carcinoma (e.g., gastro-esophageal acid reflux) and that differentiate it from non-cardia gastric adenocarcinoma. The differences in the role of codon 72 polymorphism between cardia and non-cardia gastric adenocarcinoma suggests the possible importance of environmental factors.

In summary, we have observed a positive correlation between the frequency of codon 72 Arg p53 and the age of gastric adenocarcinoma patients but not the age of noncancer patients. The percentage of homozygous Arg allele was significantly higher in cardia gastric cancer patients than in non-cardia gastric cancer patients or in noncancer patients. These findings indicate that codon 72 Arg p53 may be associated with a later onset of gastric cancer or with a prolonged survival of patients who have had gastric adenocarcinoma, especially non-cardia adenocarcinoma. It may, however, have a different role in patients with cardia gastric adenocarcinoma. Clearly, a well-designed follow-up study is needed to confirm these findings.

	FOOTNOTES

 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

¹ To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Division of Surgery, Level 7, Bristol Royal Infirmary, University of Bristol, Bristol BS2 8HW, United Kingdom. Phone: 0044-117-928-3282; Fax: 0044-117-925-2736; E-mail: z.w.zhang{at}bristol.ac.uk

² The abbreviation used is: CI, confidence interval.

Received 10/29/02; revised 2/20/03; accepted 2/21/03.

	REFERENCES

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 

1. Fan R., Wu M. T., Miller D., Wain J. C., Kelsey K. T., Wiencke J. K., Christiani D. C. The p53 codon 72 polymorphism and lung cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev., 9: 1037-1042, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Birgander R., Sjalander A., Zhou Z., Fan C., Beckman L., Beckman G. p53 polymorphisms and haplotypes in nasopharyngeal cancer. Hum. Hered., 46: 49-54, 2001.[CrossRef]
3. Birgander R., Sjalander A., Rannug A., Alexandrie A. K., Sundberg M. I., Seidegard J., Tornling G., Beckman G., Beckman L. p53 polymorphisms and haplotypes in lung cancer. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 16: 2233-2236, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Murata M., Tagawa M., Kimura M., Kimura H., Watanabe S., Saisho H. Analysis of a germ line polymorphism of the p53 gene in lung cancer patients; discrete results with smoking history. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 17: 261-264, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Sjalander A., Birgander R., Hallmans G., Cajander S., Lenner P., Athlin L., Beckman G., Beckman L. p53 polymorphisms and haplotypes in breast cancer. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 17: 1313-1316, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Wang Y. C., Lee H. S., Chen S. K., Chang Y. Y., Chen C. Y. Prognostic significance of p53 codon 72 polymorphism in lung carcinomas. Eur. J. Cancer, 35: 226-230, 1999.
7. Buchman V. L., Chumakov P. M., Ninkina N. N., Samarina O. P., Georgiev G. P. A variation in the structure of the protein-coding region of the human p53 gene. Gene, 70: 245-252, 1988.[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Matlashewski G. J., Tuck S., Pim D., Lamb P., Schneider J., Crawford L. V. Primary structure polymorphism at amino acid residue 72 of human p53. Mol. Cell. Biol., 7: 961-963, 1987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Thomas M., Kalita A., Labrecque S., Pim D., Banks L., Matlashewski G. Two polymorphic variants of wild-type p53 differ biochemically and biologically. Mol. Cell. Biol., 19: 1092-1100, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Jin X., Wu X., Roth J. A., Amos C. I., King T. M., Branch C., Honn S. E., Spitz M. R. Higher lung cancer risk for younger African-Americans with the Pro/Pro p53 genotype. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 16: 2205-2208, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Wang Y. C., Chen C. Y., Chen S. K., Chang Y. Y., Lin P. p53 codon 72 polymorphism in Taiwanese lung cancer patients: association with lung cancer susceptibility and prognosis. Clin. Cancer Res., 5: 129-134, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Kawajiri K., Nakachi K., Imai K., Watanabe J., Hayashi S. Germ line polymorphisms of p53 and CYP1A1 genes involved in human lung cancer. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 14: 1085-1089, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Storey A., Thomas M., Kalita A., Harwood C., Gardiol D., Mantovani F., Breuer J., Leigh I. M., Matlashewski G., Banks L. Role of a p53 polymorphism in the development of human papillomavirus-associated cancer. Nature (Lond.), 393: 229-234, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
14. Tenti P., Vesentini N., Rondo-Spaudo M., Zappatore R., Migliora P., Carnevali L., Ranzani G. N. p53 codon 72 polymorphism does not affect the risk of cervical cancer in patients from northern Italy. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev., 9: 435-438, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Devesa S. S., Fraumeni J. F. The rising incidence of gastric cardia cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. (Bethesda), 91: 747-749, 1999.[Free Full Text]
16. Devesa S. S., Blot W. J., Fraumeni J. F. Changing patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United States. Cancer (Phila.), 83: 2049-2053, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
17. Whelan S. L. Parkin D. M. Masuyer E. eds. . Trends in cancer incidence and mortality, IARC Scientific Publications Lyon, France 1993.
18. American Cancer Society . Cancer facts and figures, 1995, American Cancer Society Atlanta 1995.
19. Stadtlander C. T., Waterbor J. W. Molecular epidemiology, pathogenesis and prevention of gastric cancer. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 20: 2195-2208, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Hotz J., Goebell H. Epidemiology and pathogenesis of gastric carcinoma Meyer H. J. Schmoll H. J. eds. . Gastric Carcinoma, 3-15, Springer-Verlag New York 1989.
21. Tahara E. Molecular mechanism of stomach carcinogenesis. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol., 119: 265-272, 1993.[CrossRef][Medline]
22. Zhang Z. W., Farthing M. J. G. Molecular mechanisms of H pylori associated gastric carcinogenesis. World J. Gastroenterol., 5: 369-374, 1999.[Medline]
23. Shepherd T., Tolbert D., Benedetti J., Macdonald J., Stemmermann G., Wiest J., DeVoe G., Miller M. A., Wang J., Noffsinger A., Fenoglio-Preiser C. Alterations in exon 4 of the p53 gene in gastric carcinoma. Gastroenterology, 118: 1039-1044, 2000.[CrossRef][Medline]
24. Percy C. Van Holten V. Muir C. eds. . International classification of diseases for oncology, Ed. 2 World Health Organization Geneva 1990.
25. Shiao Y. H., Palli D., Caporaso N. E., Alvord W. G., Amorosi A., Nesi G., Saieva C., Masala G., Fraumeni J. F., Rice J. M. Genetic and immunohistochemical analyses of p53 independently predict regional metastasis of gastric cancers. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev., 9: 631-633, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Bonafe M., Olivieri F., Mari D., Baggio G., Mattace R., Berardelli M., Sansoni P., De-Benedictis G., De-Luca M., Marchegiani F., Cavallone L., Cardelli M., Giovagnetti S., Ferrucci L., Amadio L., Lisa R., Tucci M. G., Troiano L., Pini G., Gueresi P., Morellini M., Sorbi S., Passeri G., Barbi C., Valensin S. p53 codon 72 polymorphism and longevity: additional data on centenarians from continental Italy and Sardinia. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 65: 1782-1785, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
27. Murata M., Tagawa M., Kimura H., Kakisawa K., Shirasawa H., Fujisawa T. Correlation of the mutation of p53 gene and the polymorphism at codon 72 in smoking-related non-small cell lung cancer patients. Int. J. Oncol., 12: 577-581, 1998.[Medline]
28. Marin M. C., Jost C. A., Brooks L. A., Irwin M. S., O’Nions J., Tidy J. A., James N., McGregor J. M., Harwood C. A., Yulug I. G., Vousden K. H., Allday M. J., Gusterson B., Ikawa S., Hinds P. W., Crook T., Kaelin W. G. A common polymorphism acts as an intragenic modifier of mutant p53 behaviour. Nat. Genet., 25: 47-54, 2000.[CrossRef][Medline]
29. Kawaguchi H., Ohno S., Araki K., Miyazaki M., Saeki H., Watanabe M., Tanaka S., Sugimachi K. p53 polymorphism in human papillomavirus-associated esophageal cancer. Cancer Res., 60: 2753-2755, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Everett S. M., Axon A. T. Early gastric cancer in Europe. Gut, 41: 142-150, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Leocata P., Gallo P., Chiominto A., Saltarelli S., Cioccocioppo R., Saltarelli P., Di-Giacomo C., Ventura L. Is early gastric cancer, diffuse type, a forerunner of advanced gastric cancer?. Tumori, 79: 108-111, 1993.[Medline]
32. Eckardt V. F., Giessler W., Kanzler G., Remmele W., Bernhard G. Clinical and morphological characteristics of early gastric cancer. A case-control study. Gastroenterology, 98: 708-714, 1990.[Medline]
33. Berrino F., Sant M., Verdecchia A., Capocaccia R., Hakulinen T., Esteve J. . Survival of Cancer Patients in Europe—the EUROCARE Study, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 132, IARC Lyon, France 1995.
34. Ries L. A. G., Kosary C. L., Hankey B. F., Miller B. A., Edwards B. K. . SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973–1996, National Cancer Institute Bethesda, MD 1999.
35. Raffle A. E., Alden B., Mackenzie E. F. Detection rates for abnormal cervical smears: what are we screening for?. Lancet, 345: 1469-1473, 1995.[CrossRef][Medline]
36. Schmidt J. G. The epidemiology of mass breast cancer screening—a plea for a valid measure of benefit. J. Clin. Epidemiol., 43: 215-225, 1990.[CrossRef][Medline]
37. Axon A. Natural history of early gastric cancer. Gut, 47: 609 2000.[Free Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Yang, Y. Guo, X. Zhang, X. Miao, W. Tan, T. Sun, D. Zhao, D. Yu, J. Liu, and D. Lin Interaction of P53 Arg72Pro and MDM2 T309G polymorphisms and their associations with risk of gastric cardia cancer Carcinogenesis, September 1, 2007; 28(9): 1996 - 2001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. F. Souza and S. J. Spechler Concepts in the Prevention of Adenocarcinoma of the Distal Esophagus and Proximal Stomach CA Cancer J Clin, November 1, 2005; 55(6): 334 - 351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y.-G. Xi, K.-Y. Ding, X.-L. Su, D.-F. Chen, W.-C. You, Y. Shen, and Y. Ke p53 polymorphism and p21WAF1/CIP1 haplotype in the intestinal gastric cancer and the precancerous lesions Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2004; 25(11): 2201 - 2206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z.-W. Zhang, N. J. Laurence, A. Hollowood, P. Newcomb, M. Moorghen, J. Gupta, R. Feakins, M. J. G. Farthing, D. Alderson, and J. Holly Prognostic Value of TP53 Codon 72 Polymorphism in Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2004; 10(1): 131 - 135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zhang, Z.-W. Articles by Holly, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zhang, Z.-W. Articles by Holly, J.