Clinical Cancer Research Molecular Diagnostics in Cancer Therapeutic Development: Fulfilling the Promise of Personalized Medicine Translational Cancer Medicine 2008: Cancer Clinical Trials and Personalized Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takahiro, T.
Right arrow Articles by Toshimitsu, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Takahiro, T.
Right arrow Articles by Toshimitsu, S.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 9, 2204-2212, June 2003
© 2003 American Association for Cancer Research


Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates

Expression of Fatty Acid Synthase as a Prognostic Indicator in Soft Tissue Sarcomas1

Tajino Takahiro2, Kikuchi Shinichi and Suzuki Toshimitsu

Departments of Orthopedic Surgery [T. T., K. S.] and Second Pathology [S. T.], Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Purpose: Fatty acid synthase (FAS) is a key enzyme in the de novo biosynthesis of fatty acids. Carcinoma cells are dependent on endogenous fatty acid synthesis for growth in vitro. In a subset of human cancers, elevated FAS is associated with poor prognosis; however, the expression of FAS and the relationship between FAS and prognosis in soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) have not been studied. The objective of this study is to examine the expression of FAS in STSs and determine its relationship to clinicopathological features and prognosis.

Experimental Design: Sixty-four cases of STS were examined. The clinicopathological features and immunohistochemical expression of FAS and Ki-67 antigen were studied. Survival analysis was performed using the log-rank test and the Cox multivariate regression model.

Results: FAS expression was observed in 20 of 64 cases (31.3%) of STS. FAS-positive sarcomas were found in 13 of 23 malignant fibrous histiocytomas, 3 of 17 liposarcomas, 3 of 7 malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, and 1 extraskeletal mesenchymal chondrosarcoma. No expression of FAS was seen in the synovial sarcomas, leiomyosarcomas, or rhabdomyosarcomas that were examined. Clinicopathologically, FAS-positive tumors were significantly deep-seated (P = 0.02) and large in size (P = 0.03). FAS expression correlated with decreased disease-free survival (P = 0.006) and decreased overall survival (P = 0.003). In a multivariate analysis, expression of FAS was able to predict decreased disease-free survival but did not reach the level of significance for overall survival.

Conclusions: FAS expression is one of the predictive indicators for disease prognosis in STS.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals derive fatty acids from two sources, diet and de novo biosynthesis. Fatty acid biosynthesis requires a coordinated series of enzymatic reactions. In mammals and birds, these multiple functions for de novo biosynthesis of fatty acids are consolidated into a single protein that is the product of a single gene. This multifunctional enzyme, FAS3 (EC 2.3.1.85), exists in the cytoplasm as a homodimer with each subunit protein approximately Mr 270,000 and contains, in eight separate functional domains, seven different catalytic activities. FAS synthesizes long-chain, saturated fatty acids from acetyl-CoA, malonyl-CoA, and nicotineamide-adenine dinucleotide phosphate. The predominant product of FAS is a 16-carbon-atom fatty acid, palmitate, but FAS may also produce smaller amounts of myristate (C14), laurate (C12), and even shorter-chain fatty acids (1, 2, 3) . Long-chain fatty acids are essential constituents of all biological membrane lipids and are important substrates for energy metabolism. Under normal conditions, cells generally use circulating fatty acids from dietary lipids. FAS is therefore expressed at low levels in most normal human tissues (4) , except for liver, adipose tissue (5) , cycling endometrium (6) , fetal lung (7 , 8) , and lactating breast (9, 10, 11) .

Recent studies have demonstrated that FAS is highly expressed in human neoplasms such as breast (12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18) , prostate (19, 20, 21) , ovarian (22) , colorectal (23 , 24) , and endometrial cancers (25) . In breast, prostate, and ovarian carcinomas, high levels of FAS expression are associated with poor prognosis. Human cell lines established from breast cancer tumors showed increased rates of lipogenesis commensurate with elevated levels of FAS (26) . Inhibition of the fatty acid synthetic pathway with FAS inhibitor, cerulenin (27, 28, 29) , leads to cell death by induction of apoptosis (26 , 30, 31, 32, 33) . Moreover, cerulenin treatment was shown to inhibit the growth of a human ovarian carcinoma cell line that increased fatty acid synthetic activity in a xenograft model (34) . Thus, FAS is important as a prognostic factor in certain cancers and may represent a potential therapeutic target for chemotherapy.

STSs consist of a highly heterogenous group of malignant neoplasms with different morphological and histological subtypes. STSs constitute less than 1% of all malignant tumors (35) . Due to this rarity in occurrence, reliable and reproducible factors to determine patient prognosis are needed. Recent immunohistochemical studies on STSs have shown that overexpression of Ki-67 antigen (36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41) , p53 (37 , 42, 43, 44) , proliferating cell nuclear antigen (39) , topoisomerase II{alpha} (41) , bcl-2 (43) , and/or mdm2 (45 , 46) was associated with poor prognosis. To our knowledge, the expression of FAS has not been analyzed in STS. Recent immunohistochemical studies at our institute have shown FAS expression not only in fetal epithelial cells but also in proliferating fetal mesenchymal cells (47) . These findings suggest that FAS may be expressed in STS, which develops from immature mesenchymal cells. The objective of the present study is to examine the expression of FAS in STSs and determine its relationship to clinicopathological characteristics and patient prognosis.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Patient Selection.
We examined 101 patients with STS who were diagnosed and treated at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Fukushima Medical University Hospital (Fukushima, Japan) during the period from 1981 to 1998. Of these, we selected 64 for whom full clinical information was recorded and whose paraffin-embedded biopsy and/or surgically resected tumor specimens were available for immunohistochemical study. Thirty-seven patients were excluded from the study due to inadequate clinical data (23 cases) or distant metastasis or regional lymph node involvement of the disease at the first presentation (14 cases). Clinical data were collected by reviewing patient medical records and included the following: patient’s age at presentation; sex; family history and past history of malignancies; duration of symptoms before presentation; type of surgery; pre- and postoperative adjuvant therapy; date and site of the recurrence including regional lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis; and the patient’s current status.

Tumors.
Pathological data included the location, depth, size of maximum diameter of primary tumors, tumor presentation (primary or recurrent), histological type and grade, number of mitotic figures, and surgical margin (48) at definitive surgery. The histological type and grade of malignancy were evaluated according to the criteria of Enzinger and Weiss (49) . The histological grade of malignancy was divided into three grades based on degree of tumor differentiation, tumor necrosis, and mitotic count. For immunohistochemical studies, selection of paraffin-embedded samples was based on the most representative and best-preserved tumor tissues.

Patient Follow-up Techniques.
The patients were observed at 6- or 8-week intervals during the 2 years following surgical treatment and then observed every 3 or 4 months for the next 3 years and every 6 months thereafter. Follow-up consisted of chest radiographs and physical examination. DFS was calculated as the time of the initial surgery for the primary tumor to the date of the first documentation of clinical recurrence, metastasis of the disease, or the date of the last follow-up visit. OS was calculated as the date of the initial operation to the date of death or the last follow-up visit. No patients were lost during follow-up.

Antibodies and Immunohistochemistry.
We used polyclonal rabbit antibody against human brain FAS (dilution, 1:200; Immuno-Biological Laboratories Co., Fujioka, Japan) and monoclonal mouse antibody for anti-Ki-67 (clone MIB-1; dilution, 1:100; Immunotech Corp., Marseille, France) to label specimens. The method for producing this polyclonal anti-FAS antibody and the specificity have been described previously (47) .

Tissue sections (4-µm thick) from archival, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens were mounted on poly-L-lysine (Muto Chemicals, Tokyo, Japan)-coated slides. The samples were deparaffinized in xylene for 15 min and rehydrated in a series of graded ethanol. Endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide in 95% methanol for 20 min. Antigen retrieval was performed with citrate buffer (0.01 M, pH 6.0) in an 800-W microwave oven (Toshiba Corp., Tokyo, Japan) for a total of 15 min. The tissues were then cooled and incubated with 5% skim milk (Snow Brand Milk Products Co., Tokyo, Japan) in PBS for 30 min to block nonspecific adsorption of immunoglobulins to the tissues. Primary antibodies were then applied to the tissues and incubated with them overnight at 4°C. After extensive washing in PBS, the products of the immunoreaction were visualized with streptavidin-biotin complex immunoperoxidase kits for mouse IgG or rabbit IgG (Histofine SAB-PO kit; Nichirei Corp., Tokyo, Japan) with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (Dojindo Laboratory, Kumamoto, Japan) as the chromogen. Cellular nuclei were counterstained with 1% methyl green. The slides were then dehydrated, and coverslips were applied using permount. Negative controls were constructed by omitting the primary antibodies or staining with nonimmune rabbit or mouse IgG. No staining was observed in negative control samples.

Evaluation of Staining.
FAS staining was considered positive when the cytoplasm of the tumor cells was stained. For nuclear antigen of Ki-67, tumor cells showing a definite nuclear staining were scored as positive. The intensity of staining was not graded.

Positive staining was evaluated with a KS Image Analysis Systems (Carl Zeiss Vision). The areas containing the largest number of positive tumor cells were selected on a high-power field of a microscope, and the microscopic images of these areas were downloaded to a computer with a color video camera. The images were enhanced to help distinguish the density of the brown diaminobenzidine reaction product from the methyl green-stained nuclei. A minimum of 1000 tumor cells were counted on the computer display with the manual point measure mode of this software. The percentage of positive cells was then calculated.

The tumor tissues were estimated to be positive when Ki-67 or FAS labeling of more than 10% of the tumor cells was seen. A cutoff value of 10% for Ki-67 was chosen arbitrarily for statistical requirements following literature data (37 , 38 , 41) , and a cutoff value of 10% for FAS was pursuant to Ki-67.

Statistical Analysis.
The following variables were analyzed for their possible prognostic value: patient age at presentation; sex; duration of symptoms before presentation; location; depth and size of the primary tumor; tumor presentation (primary or recurrent); histological type and grade; number of mitotic figures; surgical margin at definitive surgery; and immunoreactivity of Ki-67 and FAS. Statistical significance between these clinicopathological factors and status of immunoreactivity of FAS was evaluated with Fisher’s exact test, a {chi}2 test, and Mann-Whitney U test. The correlation of the percentage of FAS and Ki-67 positivity was evaluated using bivariate analysis with calculation of Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. DFS and OS in relation to all potential prognostic variables and immunostaining status were computed by the Kaplan-Meier method (50) for 64 STS patients. The differences between the survival curves were evaluated by the log-rank test to determine statistical significance levels (51) . Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were based on the Cox proportional hazards model (52) . In the multivariate analysis, all variables with hazard ratios significantly different from 1.0 in univariate analysis were taken into consideration. The confidence level for statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. These statistical analyses were performed using StatView 5.0 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Clinicopathological Features.
A summary of the clinical and pathological data is presented in Table 1Citation . Subjects included 35 males and 29 females ranging in age from 0 to 82 years (median age, 53.0 years). The duration of symptoms fluctuated from 0 to 312 months (median, 7.0 months). Fifty-one patients were initially treated for primary tumors at our hospital, and the other 13 patients were treated for locally recurrent tumors after resection elsewhere. Surgical treatment was as follows: 5 amputations; 33 wide local excisions; 21 marginal excisions; and 5 intracapsular excisions.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Clinicopathological characteristics of 64 patients with STS

 
The primary tumors were located in the upper extremities in 12 cases, the lower extremities in 36 cases, and the trunk in the remaining 16 cases, including 1 in the neck region. Fifteen tumors were located superficially, and 49 were deep-seated (below the superficial fascia). Tumor size ranged from 1 to 26 cm (median, 10.0 cm), and 54 cases (84.4%) had tumors of >5 cm in diameter. Histological types included 23 MFHs (35.9%), 17 liposarcomas (26.5%), 7 MPNSTs (10.9%), 4 synovial sarcomas (6.2%), 3 leiomyosarcomas (4.7%), 2 each of rhabdomyosarcomas and undifferentiated sarcomas (3.1%), and 1 each of clear cell sarcoma, extraskeletal Ewing’s sarcoma, extraskeletal mesenchymal chondrosarcoma, extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma, fibrosarcoma, and malignant hemangiopericytoma (1.6%). The number of mitotic figures revealed a variation from 0 to 28 per 10 high-power fields (median, 1; average, 4.1). The tumors were classified as grade 1 in 13 patients, grade 2 in 23 patients, and grade 3 in 28 patients. The surgical margin was evaluated as wide in 37 patients, marginal in 22 patients, and intracapsular in 5 patients.

The median and mean follow-up periods for patients in this study were 52 and 68 months, respectively. Local recurrence occurred in 15 patients (23.4%), and 19 developed distant metastasis or regional lymph node metastasis (29.7%). At the conclusion of this investigation, 46 patients were alive with no evidence of disease, 1 patient was alive with disease, and 17 had died of their disease. The 5-year survival probability was 70.2%.

Immunohistochemical Features of FAS.
Immunohistochemical expression of FAS was seen in 20 patients (31.3%). FAS reactivity was located in the cytoplasm and usually displayed a granular pattern. The staining was heterogeneous within the tumor, and the intensity of staining varied from region to region and from cell to cell. The cytoplasmic membranes of normal fat cells in each specimen stained strongly with the FAS antibody and served as an internal positive control. FAS-positive sarcomas included 13 of the 23 MFHs (56.5%; Fig. 1, A and BCitation ), 3 of the 17 liposarcomas (17.6%; Fig. 1, C and DCitation ), 3 of the 7 MPNSTs (42.9%; Fig. 1, E and FCitation ), and the extraskeletal mesenchymal chondrosarcoma. There were no FAS-positive tumors in the patients with synovial sarcomas, leiomyosarcomas, or rhabdomyosarcomas.



View larger version (157K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Representative storiform-pleomorphic-type MFH (A and B), myxoid-type liposarcoma (C and D), and a MPNST (E and F) are shown. Immunohistochemical staining for FAS is detected in the cytoplasm of the tumor cells, displaying a granular pattern in all cases. A, C, and E, H&E staining; B, D, and F, immunostaining for anti-FAS antigen; original magnification, x400.

 
Statistical Relationship between FAS and Clinicopathological Variables.
FAS expression was associated with depth (Fisher’s exact test, P = 0.02) and size (Mann-Whitney U test, P = 0.03) of the tumors. FAS-positive tumors were significantly deep-seated and large in size. MFHs expressed FAS more significantly than the other STSs (Fisher’s exact test, P = 0.002). FAS-positive tumors were also significant for Ki-67 (Fisher’s exact test, P = 0.02), and there was a significant correlation between FAS-positive and Ki-67-positive status (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient = 0.26, P = 0.04). There was no significant association between FAS and the other variables (sex, age, location, number of mitotic figures, and so forth; Table 2Citation ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2 Statistical relationship between FAS status and other variables in 64 patients with STS

 
Survival Analysis.
Survival analysis determined that FAS-positive tumors were significantly associated with a higher risk of recurrence and metastasis. We found that FAS status also significantly predicted DFS (P = 0.006; Fig. 2ACitation ) and OS (P = 0.003; Fig. 2BCitation ). The 5- and 10-year probabilities of DFS of patients with FAS-positive tumors were 33.7% and 25.3%, respectively, whereas those of patients with FAS-negative tumors were 64.5% and 59.9%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year OS rates of patients with FAS-positive tumors (48.9% and 29.3%, respectively) were significantly lower than those of FAS-negative tumors (80.5% each). Other prognostic factors, such as location (P = 0.04), tumor grade (P = 0.002), surgical margin (P = 0.003), and Ki-67 immunoreactivity (P = 0.004), were associated with DFS. Tumor grade, surgical margin, and Ki-67 status were also associated with OS (P = 0.0001, 0.008, and 0.003, respectively; Table 3Citation ).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. The probability of DFS (A) and OS (B) in 64 patients with STSs evaluated for FAS expression. FAS status significantly predicts DFS (P = 0.006) and OS (P = 0.003).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3 Log-rank analysis of DFS and OS in 64 patients with STS

 
Multivariate analysis showed that FAS status was a predictor for DFS. Patients with tumors expressing FAS were 2.73 times more likely to relapse than those with FAS-negative tumors (95% confidence interval, 1.17–6.41; P = 0.02). Another significant factor for DFS was surgical margin (hazard ratio = 3.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.45–8.50; P = 0.005). The only significant predictor for OS was tumor grade (P = 0.04); FAS status did not reach the level of significance for OS (P = 0.07) in multivariate analysis (Table 4)Citation .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4 Univariate and multivariate analysis of DFS and OS in 64 patients with STS

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In the present study, FAS expression was seen in about 30% of 64 STSs by immunohistochemistry. Thirteen of 23 MFHs, 3 of 7 MPNSTs, 3 of 17 liposarcomas, and 1 extraskeletal mesenchymal chondrosarcoma exhibited FAS in the cytoplasm of tumor cells. From these results, expression of FAS seems to be up-regulated mainly in MFHs and MPNSTs. In liposarcomas, FAS expression was a rather rare event, despite FAS-positive results in mature adipocytes as reported previously (47) , and was confirmed by the immunostaining present.

Expression of FAS in STSs displayed good correlation with deep-seated localization of tumors. Deep-seated STSs generally show malignant behavior and have a predictably poorer prognosis (53, 54, 55) . FAS seems to be associated with tumor cell aggressiveness through energy production and supply of membrane constituents through the metabolism of fatty acids. In addition, FAS expression in STSs correlated with the size of the tumor. This indicates that FAS expression is associated with progression of STS, although several human tumors revealed up-regulated FAS expression even in premalignant or precancerous lesion (56) .

As described in the "Introduction," there are two sources of fatty acids for animals, diet and de novo biosynthesis, of which the latter is regulated by FAS. Increased FAS expression implies that fatty acids from the de novo biosynthesis are increased in cells or tissues. However, it is not clear whether increased FAS expression is intrinsic for highly proliferative cells (including tumor cells). It is possible that the increased FAS expression of tumor cells is an indirect, associated phenomenon, which occurs to compensate for an insufficiency of dietary fatty acids due to, e.g., lack of angiogenesis. FAS expression may not be essential even in highly proliferative tumor cells in the presence of enough fatty acids. Pizer et al. (30) showed that HL60 human promyelocytic leukemia cells maintained in a fatty acid-free medium died when cerulenin, an inhibitor of FAS, was administered. The cell death by this cerulenin addition was rescued by adding palmitate, which is a product of FAS. They reported (30) that HL60 cells maintained in medium to which serum containing endogenous fatty acid was added retained their sensitivity to cerulenin. These results demonstrate that HL60 cells are dependent on the endogenous fatty acid produced by FAS for their proliferation and survival. However, it remains unclear whether this phenomenon is common to sarcoma cells.

In 20-week-old human fetal tissues, FAS expression was observed not only in epithelial cells but also in growing mesenchymal cells, such as fibroblasts, osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and Schwann cells (47) . These findings support the idea that FAS is necessary for proliferation of fetal mesenchymal cells and may also suggest that proliferation of STSs, which develop from immature mesenchymal cells, requires the endogenous fatty acids produced by FAS.

Our study also demonstrates that immunohistochemical detection of FAS provides important prognostic information in patients with STS. Patients with tumors expressing FAS demonstrated a statistically significant lower rate of DFS and OS compared with those whose tumors did not express FAS. Expression of FAS, however, was not an independent prognostic predictor in STS when compared with Ki-67 labeling index.

The prognostic significance of FAS expression levels has been described previously in certain cancers. Kuhajda et al. (26) showed that about 30% of patients with early breast cancers expressed haptoglobin-related protein epitopes later proven to be identical with FAS. They concluded that patients expressing haptoglobin-related protein had a significantly increased risk of recurrence (13) . In the immunohistochemical studies focusing on node-negative breast carcinomas, FAS was strongly and statistically associated with recurrence and short DFS or OS (15 , 16) . In prostate cancers, FAS was associated with higher tumor grade, larger tumor volume, advancing clinical stage, and Gleason’s score, one of the most powerful predictors (19, 20, 21) . FAS expression has also been studied in ovarian neoplasia, where it was seen to be associated with histological tumor grade and shorter survival (22) .

Although it has not previously been associated with poor prognosis, FAS expression has been detected in various tumors and associated with histological subtype, histopathological grade, and tumor aggressiveness. Such cases include colorectal adenocarcinomas that show an increase of FAS intensity in colloid/mucinous carcinomas and carcinomas with extensive metastatic involvement of lymph nodes (23) and endometrial adenocarcinomas that show FAS expression intensity increasing with tumor grade (25) . FAS expression was also correlated with the degree of dysplasia and correlated with late-stage colon carcinogenesis (24) .

The association between FAS expression and tumor size or a marker of proliferative activity of tumor cells suggests that fatty acid synthesis is related to growth and proliferation of these malignant tumors. Alò et al. (16) have shown that there is a significant association between FAS and the maximum diameters of tumor masses in breast carcinoma. In prostate cancer, FAS expression has also been shown to be significantly associated with tumor volume (19) . On the other hand, the immunohistochemical detection of Ki-67 antigen is a suitable method for determination of the proliferative rate of tumors. A close linkage between FAS and Ki-67 expression has been reported previously in breast (15) and endometrial carcinomas (25) . Our present data demonstrate that FAS expression is also associated with Ki-67 expression in STS. In the expression of immunohistochemically detectable markers connected with proliferative activity, Ki-67 has been shown to be of prognostic value for a heterogeneous group of STSs (36, 37, 38, 39) .

Although FAS expression has been correlated with the Ki-67 index, FAS expression was not related to the number of mitotic figures, which formed one of the indices of proliferative activity. A possible reason for this is that the power of the test of the number of mitotic figures was lower than that of Ki-67 expression. The number of mitotic figures counted in this study ranged widely from 0 to 28. However, there were 22 cases in which mitotic figures were not observed, and these accounted for more than one-third of all 64 cases. The number of mitotic figures was 1 in 11 cases. The median number of mitotic figures was therefore 1, and the cases in which the number of mitotic figures was less than 1 occupied the majority. On the other hand, Ki-67 reacts with a nuclear antigen expressed throughout the cell cycle, except in the G0 phase, and mitotic figures were detected in M-phase tumor cells. Ki-67 expression reflects proliferative potency more precisely than the number of mitotic figures (35 , 57) . Because the number of mitotic figures did not sufficiently reflect the proliferative activity of STSs examined in this study, it did not significantly correlate with FAS expression.

Würl et al. (44) suggest that for immunohistochemical evaluation of p53 overexpression in STS, a panel of at least two NH2-terminal antibodies should be used. They compared the prognostic relevance of five different p53 antibodies in STS, and only the NH2-terminal-binding monoclonal antibodies showed a multivariate correlation with survival. With p53 polyclonal antibody, there was a strong association between immunostaining and survival, but it showed no significant correlation with prognosis on multivariate analysis. They attributed this to segments in the NH2-terminal area of the p53 protein with a regulatory effect on the transcription of a variety of proteins that regulate the cell cycle. Therefore, the preservation of certain NH2-terminal epitopes and their overexpression (and thus the possibility of detecting this protein segment) have a particular biological and therefore prognostic significance. The FAS antibody that was used in this study was polyclonal, and multivariate analysis was not able to find a correlation between immunoreactivity and survival. As was the case with the p53 monoclonal antibody, if an anti-FAS monoclonal antibody had been used, significant correlation with survival may have been found by multivariate analysis. This will need to be examined in future investigations.

Würl et al. (58) reported that tumor type, stage (including mitotic counts and the appearance of necrosis), localization, type of surgery, and p53 and mdm2 protein overexpression were each independent prognostic factors for STS in the Cox model. This is consistent with our findings. In our study, the clinicopathological indicators that correlate with prognosis were tumor type, grade, localization, surgical margin, and FAS and Ki-67 expression. However, our method of analysis was different. They subdivided tumor histology into six types (fibrosarcoma, MFH, MPNST, liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma), subdivided localization into four regions (extremity, head and neck, trunk wall, and abdomen and retroperitoneum), and subdivided stage into eight stages (from IA to IVB). These factors were directly used in the Cox model multivariate analysis. On the other hand, we divided each factor, such as tumor type, grade, and localization, into two groups. We performed univariate and multivariate analysis based on the Cox proportional hazards model to determine which of the prognostic factors was significantly different in a log-rank test. We were not able to use the examination method used by Würl et al. (58) because there were too few cases. Nevertheless, despite the limited number of cases, our method of analysis was appropriate because the prognostic indicators provided were similar.

In addition to its utility as a prognostic indicator, FAS also shows promise as a chemotherapeutic target. Several studies have shown that cerulenin, a specific noncompetitive inhibitor of the ß-ketoacyl synthase activity of FAS (27, 28, 29) , is selectively cytotoxic to cancer cells that have increased fatty acid synthesis, but not to normal cells (26 , 30, 31, 32, 33) , which have constitutively low levels of FAS (4) . Tumors that are found to express FAS at an increased level are the same subsets of STS shown in the present study and might be an excellent therapeutic target for inhibition of fatty acid synthesis.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Hiraki Hiroyuki for technical assistance in immunohistochemical studies.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported in part by Grant-in-Aid 10670168 for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan. Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Hikariga-oka 1, Fukushima 960-1247, Japan. Phone: 81-24-548-2111; Fax: 81-24-548-5505; E-mail: taka-tjn{at}fmu.ac.jp Back

3 The abbreviations used are: FAS, fatty acid synthase; STS, soft tissue sarcoma; MFH, malignant fibrous histiocytoma; MPNST, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor; DFS, disease-free survival; OS, overall survival. Back

Received 11/ 7/01; revised 1/30/03; accepted 2/19/03.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Wakil S. J. Fatty acid synthase, a proficient multifunctional enzyme. Biochemistry, 28: 4523-4530, 1989.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Smith S. The animal fatty acid synthase: one gene, one polypeptide, seven enzymes.. FASEB J., 8: 1248-1259, 1994.[Abstract]
  3. Semenkovich C. F. Regulation of fatty acid synthase (FAS). Prog. Lipid Res., 36: 43-53, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Weiss L., Hoffmann G. E., Schreiber R., Andres H., Fuchs E., Körber E., Kolb H. J. Fatty-acid biosynthesis in man, a pathway of minor importance. Purification, optimal assay conditions, and organ distribution of fatty-acid synthase. Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler, 367: 905-912, 1986.[Medline]
  5. Amy C. M., Williams-Ahlf B., Naggert J., Smith S. Molecular cloning of the mammalian fatty acid synthase gene and identification of the promoter region. Biochem. J., 271: 675-679, 1990.[Medline]
  6. Escot C., Joyeux C., Mathieu M., Maudelonde T., Pages A., Rochefort H., Chalbos D. Regulation of fatty acid synthase ribonucleic acid in the human endometrium during the menstrual cycle. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 70: 1319-1324, 1990.[Abstract]
  7. Pope T. S., Smart D. A., Rooney S. A. Hormonal effects on fatty-acid synthase in cultured fetal rat lung; induction by dexamethasone and inhibition of activity by triiodothyronine. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 959: 169-177, 1988.[Medline]
  8. Xu Z. X., Stenzel W., Sasic S. M., Smart D. A., Rooney S. A. Glucocorticoid regulation of fatty acid synthase gene expression in fetal rat lung. Am. J. Physiol., 265: L140-L147, 1993.
  9. Smith S., Ryan P. Asynchronous appearance of two enzymes concerned with medium chain fatty acid synthesis in developing rat mammary gland. J. Biol. Chem., 254: 8932-8936, 1979.[Free Full Text]
  10. Thompson B. J., Smith S. Biosynthesis of fatty acids by lactating human breast epithelial cells: an evaluation of the contribution to the overall composition of human milk fat.. Pediatr. Res., 19: 139-143, 1985.[Medline]
  11. Joyeux C., Chalbos D., Rochefort H. Effects of progestins and menstrual cycle on fatty acid synthetase and progesterone receptor in human mammary glands. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 70: 1438-1444, 1990.[Abstract]
  12. Kuhajda F. P., Katumuluwa A. I., Pasternack G. R. Expression of haptoglobin-related protein and its potential role as a tumor antigen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 86: 1188-1192, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Kuhajda F. P., Piantadosi S., Pasternack G. R. Haptoglobin-related protein (Hpr) epitopes in breast cancer as a predictor of recurrence of the disease. N. Engl. J. Med., 321: 636-641, 1989.[Abstract]
  14. Shurbaji M. S., Pasternack G. R., Kuhajda F. P. Expression of haptoglobin-related protein in primary and metastatic breast cancers. A longitudinal study of 48 fatal tumors. Am. J. Clin. Pahol., 96: 238-242, 1991.[Medline]
  15. Jensen V., Ladekarl M., Holm-Nielsen P., Melsen F., Soerensen F. B. The prognostic value of oncogenic antigen 519 (OA-519) expression and proliferative activity detected by antibody MIB-1 in node-negative breast cancer. J. Pathol., 176: 343-352, 1995.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Alò P. L., Visca P., Marci A., Mangoni A., Botti C., Di Tondo U. Expression of fatty acid synthase (FAS) as a predictor of recurrence in stage I breast carcinoma patients. Cancer (Phila.), 77: 474-482, 1996.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Milgraum L. Z., Witters L. A., Pasternack G. R., Kuhajda F. P. Enzymes of the fatty acid synthesis pathway are highly expressed in in situ breast carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res., 3: 2115-2120, 1997.[Abstract]
  18. Alò P. L., Visca P., Trombetta G., Mangoni A., Lenti L., Monaco S., Botti C., Serpieri D. E., Di Tondo U. Fatty acid synthase (FAS) predictive strength in poorly differentiated early breast carcinomas. Tumori, 85: 35-40, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Shurbaji M. S., Kuhajda F. P., Pasternack G. R., Thurmond T. S. Expression of oncogenic antigen 519 (OA-519) in prostate cancer is a potential prognostic indicator. Am. J. Clin. Pathol., 97: 686-691, 1992.[Medline]
  20. Epstein J. I., Carmichael M., Partin A. W. OA-519 (fatty acid synthase) as an independent predictor of pathologic stage in adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Urology, 45: 81-86, 1995.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Shurbaji M. S., Kalbfleisch J. H., Thurmond T. S. Immunohistochemical detection of a fatty acid synthase (OA-519) as a predictor of progression of prostate cancer. Hum. Pathol., 27: 917-921, 1996.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Gansler T. S., Hardman W., Hunt D. A., Schaffel S., Hennigar R. A. Increased expression of fatty acid synthase (OA-519) in ovarian neoplasms predicts shorter survival. Hum. Pathol., 28: 686-692, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Rashid A., Pizer E. S., Moga M., Milgraum L. Z., Zahurak M., Pasternack G. R., Kuhajda F. P., Hamilton S. R. Elevated expression of fatty acid synthase and fatty acid synthetic activity in colorectal neoplasia. Am. J. Pathol., 150: 201-208, 1997.[Abstract]
  24. Visca P., Alò P. L., Del Nonno F., Botti C., Trombetta G., Marandino F., Filippi S., Di Tondo U., Donnorso R. P. Immunohistochemical expression of fatty acid synthase, apoptotic-regulating genes, proliferating factors, and ras protein product in colorectal adenomas, carcinomas, and adjacent nonneoplastic mucosa. Clin. Cancer Res., 5: 4111-4118, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Pizer E. S., Lax S. F., Kuhajda F. P., Pasternack G. R., Kurman R. J. Fatty acid synthase expression in endometrial carcinoma. Correlation with cell proliferation and hormone receptors. Cancer (Phila.), 83: 528-537, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Kuhajda F. P., Jenner K., Wood F. D., Hennigar R. A., Jacobs L. B., Dick J. D., Pasternack G. R. Fatty acid synthesis: a potential selective target for antineoplastic therapy.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91: 6379-6383, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Vance D., Goldberg I., Mitsuhashi O., Bloch K. Inhibition of fatty acid synthetases by the antibiotic cerulenin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 48: 649-656, 1972.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Omura S. The antibiotic cerulenin, a novel tool for biochemistry as an inhibitor of fatty acid synthesis. Bacteriol. Rev., 40: 681-697, 1976.[Free Full Text]
  29. Funabashi H., Kawaguchi A., Tomoda H., Omura S., Okuda S., Iwasaki S. Binding site cerulenin in fatty acid synthetase. J. Biochem. (Tokyo), 105: 751-755, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Pizer E. S., Wood F. D., Pasternack G. R., Kuhajda F. P. Fatty acid synthase (FAS): a target for cytotoxic antimetabolites in HL60 promyelocytic leukemia cells.. Cancer Res., 56: 745-751, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Pizer E. S., Jackisch C., Wood F. D., Pasternack G. R., Davidson N. E., Kuhajda F. P. Inhibition of fatty acid synthesis induced programmed cell death in human breast cancer cells. Cancer Res., 56: 2745-2747, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Furuya Y., Akimoto S., Yasuda K., Ito H. Apoptosis of androgen-independent prostate cell line induced by inhibition of fatty acid synthesis. Anticancer Res., 17: 4589-4594, 1997.[Medline]
  33. Pizer E. S., Chrest F. J., DiGiuseppe J. A., Han W. F. Pharmacological inhibitors of mammalian fatty acid synthase suppress DNA replication and induce apoptosis in tumor cell lines. Cancer Res., 58: 4611-4615, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Pizer E. S., Wood F. D., Heine H. S., Romantsev F. E., Pasternack G. R., Kuhajda F. P. Inhibition of fatty acid synthesis delays disease progression in a xenograft model of ovarian cancer. Cancer Res., 56: 1189-1193, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Weiss S. W., Goldblum J. R. . Enzinger and Weiss’s Soft Tissue Tumors, 4th ed. 1-2, Mosby Inc. St. Louis, MO 2001.
  36. Ueda T., Aozasa K., Tsujimoto M., Ohsawa M., Uchida A., Aoki Y., Ono K., Matsumoto K. Prognostic significance of Ki-67 reactivity soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer (Phila.), 63: 1607-1611, 1989.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Drobnjak M., Latres E., Pollack D., Karpeh M., Dubas M., Woodruff J. M., Brennan M. F., Cordon-Cardo C. Prognostic implications of p53 nuclear overexpression and high proliferation index of Ki-67 in adult soft-tissue sarcomas. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. (Bethesda), 86: 549-554, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Choong P. F. M., Åkerman M., Willén H., Andersson C., Gustafson P., Baldetorp B., Fernö M., Alvegård T., Rydholm A. Prognostic value of Ki-67 expression in 182 soft tissue sarcomas. Proliferation-a marker of metastasis?. APMIS, 102: 915-924, 1994.[Medline]
  39. Choong P. F. M., Åkerman M., Willén H., Andersson C., Gustafson P., Alvegård T., Rydholm A. Expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and Ki-67 in soft tissue sarcoma. Is prognostic significance histotype-specific?. APMIS, 103: 797-805, 1995.[Medline]
  40. Levine E. A., Holzmayer T., Bacus S., Mechetner E., Mera R., Bolliger C., Roninson I. B., Das Gupta T. K. Evaluation of newer prognostic markers for adult soft tissue sarcomas. J. Clin. Oncol., 15: 3249-3257, 1997.[Abstract]
  41. Rudolph P., Kellner U., Chassevent A., Collin F., Bonichon F., Parwaresch R., Coindre J. M. Prognostic relevance of a novel proliferation marker, Ki-S11, for soft-tissue sarcoma. A multivariate study. Am. J. Pathol., 150: 1997-2007, 1997.[Abstract]
  42. Kawai A., Noguchi M., Beppu Y., Yokoyama R., Mukai K., Hirohashi S., Inoue H., Fukuma H. Nuclear immunoreaction of p53 protein in soft tissue sarcomas. A possible prognostic factor. Cancer (Phila.), 73: 2499-2505, 1994.[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Nakanishi H., Ohsawa M., Naka N., Uchida A., Ochi T., Aozasa K. Immunohistochemical detection of bcl-2 and p53 proteins and apoptosis in soft tissue sarcoma: their correlations with prognosis.. Oncology (Basel), 54: 238-244, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Würl P., Taubert H., Meye A., Berger D., Lautenschläger C., Holzhausen H. J., Schmidt H., Kalthoff H., Rath F. W., Dralle H. Prognostic value of immunohistochemistry for p53 in primary soft-tissue sarcomas: a multivariate analysis of five antibodies.. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol., 123: 502-508, 1997.[Medline]
  45. Cordon-Cardo C., Latres E., Drobnjak M., Oliva M. R., Pollack D., Woodruff J. M., Marechal V., Chen J., Brennan M. F., Levine A. J. Molecular abnormalities of mdm2 and p53 genes in adult soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer Res., 54: 794-799, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Würl P., Meye A., Schmidt H., Lautenschläger C., Kalthoff H., Rath F. W., Taubert H. High prognostic significance of Mdm2/p53 co-overexpression in soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. Oncogene, 16: 1183-1185, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. Kusakabe T., Maeda M., Hoshi N., Sugino T., Watanabe K., Fukuda T., Suzuki T. Fatty acid synthase is expressed mainly in adult hormone-sensitive cells or cells with high lipid metabolism and in proliferating fetal cells. J. Histochem. Cytochem., 48: 613-622, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Enneking W. F. . Muskuloskeletal Tumor Surgery, Vol. 1: 90-95, Churchill Livingstone, Inc. New York 1983.
  49. Enzinger F. M., Weiss S. W. . Soft Tissue Tumors, 3rd ed. 4-12, Mosby-Year Book, Inc. St. Louis, MO 1995.
  50. Kaplan E. L., Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observation. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 53: 457-481, 1958.[CrossRef]
  51. Peto R., Pike M. C., Armitage P., Breslow N. E., Cox D. R., Howard S. V., Mantel N., McPherson K., Peto J., Smith P. G. Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. Analysis and examples. Br. J. Cancer, 35: 1-39, 1977.[Medline]
  52. Cox D. R. Regression models and life tables. J. R. Stat. Soc., 34: 187-220, 1972.
  53. Coindre J. M., Nguyen B. B., Bonichon F., de Mascarel I., Trojani M. Histopathologic grading in spindle cell soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer (Phila.), 61: 2305-2309, 1988.[CrossRef][Medline]
  54. Tsujimoto M., Aozasa K., Ueda T., Morimura Y., Komatsubara Y., Doi T. Multivariate analysis for histologic prognostic factors in soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer (Phila.), 62: 994-998, 1988.[CrossRef][Medline]
  55. Coindre J. M., Terrier P., Bui N. B., Bonichon F., Collin F., Le Doussal V., Mandard A. M., Vilain M. O., Jacquemier J., Duplay H., Sastre X., Barlier C., Henry-Amar M., Mace-Lesech J., Contesso G. Prognostic factors in adult patients with locally controlled soft tissue sarcoma. A study of 546 patients from the French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group. J. Clin. Oncol., 14: 869-877, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Kuhajda F. P. Fatty acid synthase and human cancer: new perspectives on its role in tumor biology.. Nutrition, 16: 202-208, 2000.[CrossRef][Medline]
  57. Gerdes J., Lemke H., Baisch H., Wacker H. H., Schwab U., Stein H. Cell cycle analysis of a cell proliferation-associated human nuclear antigen defined by the monoclonal antibody Ki-67. J. Immunol., 133: 1710-1715, 1984.[Abstract]
  58. Würl P., Lautenschläger C., Meye A., Schmidt H., Bache M., Rath F. W., Schönfelder M., Taubert H. A multifactorial prognostic model for adult soft tissue sarcoma considering clinical, histopathological and molecular data. Anticancer Res., 20: 2065-2072, 2000.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
N. Riggi, L. Cironi, P. Provero, M.-L. Suva, J.-C. Stehle, K. Baumer, L. Guillou, and I. Stamenkovic
Expression of the FUS-CHOP Fusion Protein in Primary Mesenchymal Progenitor Cells Gives Rise to a Model of Myxoid Liposarcoma.
Cancer Res., July 15, 2006; 66(14): 7016 - 7023.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
F. P. Kuhajda
Fatty Acid synthase and cancer: new application of an old pathway.
Cancer Res., June 15, 2006; 66(12): 5977 - 5980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. Carlisle-Moore, C. R. Gordon, C. A. Machutta, W. T. Miller, and P. J. Tonge
Substrate Recognition by the Human Fatty-acid Synthase
J. Biol. Chem., December 30, 2005; 280(52): 42612 - 42618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
Y. Chang, J. Wang, X. Lu, D. P. Thewke, and R. J. Mason
KGF induces lipogenic genes through a PI3K and JNK/SREBP-1 pathway in H292 cells
J. Lipid Res., December 1, 2005; 46(12): 2624 - 2635.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takahiro, T.
Right arrow Articles by Toshimitsu, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Takahiro, T.
Right arrow Articles by Toshimitsu, S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation