This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Camp, E. R. Articles by Ellis, L. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Camp, E. R. Articles by Ellis, L. M.

Roles of Nitric Oxide Synthase Inhibition and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 Inhibition on Vascular Morphology and Function in an In vivo Model of Pancreatic Cancer

Authors' Affiliations: Departments of ¹ Surgical Oncology and ² Cancer Biology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas and ³ ImClone Systems, Inc., New York, New York

Requests for reprints: Lee M. Ellis, Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, P.O. Box 301402, Houston, TX 77230-1402; Phone: 713-792-6926; Fax: 713-792-4689; E-mail: lellis{at}mdanderson.org.

Purpose: Both nitric oxide (NO) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) mediate tumor vascular function. Because these molecules regulate one another's expression, we hypothesized that NO synthase (NOS) inhibition produces effects comparable to those of anti-VEGF therapy on human pancreatic cancer xenografts.

Experimental Design: L3.6pl human pancreatic cancer cells were s.c. implanted in nude mice. On day 6, mice were randomized to receive (a) PBS (control), (b) DC101 [VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) antibody] by i.p. injection, (c) N-nitro-L-arginine (NNLA; NOS inhibitor) in the drinking water, or (d) both DC101 and NNLA. Mice were killed on day 20.

Results: DC101 and NNLA as single agents inhibited tumor growth by 50% to 60% (P < 0.008 for both). Furthermore, combined therapy inhibited mean tumor growth by 89% (P < 0.008). Combined inhibition of VEGFR-2 and NOS also decreased mean vessel counts by 65% (P < 0.03) and vessel area by 80% versus controls (P < 0.001). In contrast to DC101 where vessel diameter was similar to control, NNLA decreased mean vessel diameter by 42% (P < 0.001). NNLA also led to a 54% (P < 0.03) decrease in tumor uptake of the perfusion marker Hoechst 33342 versus controls whereas DC101 decreased Hoechst 33342 staining by 43% (P < 0.03). The combination of inhibitors decreased perfusion by 73% (P < 0.03).

Conclusions: Although VEGFR-2 can mediate NOS activity, the combination of VEGFR-2 and NOS inhibition significantly increased the antivascular effect over single agent therapy. The addition of NOS inhibition led to an even further alteration of tumor vessel morphology and vascular perfusion compared with VEGFR-2 blockade, suggesting that NO and VEGFR-2 have distinct but complementary effects on the tumor vasculature.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. J. Gray, G. Van Buren, N. A. Dallas, L. Xia, X. Wang, A. D. Yang, R. J. Somcio, Y. G. Lin, S. Lim, F. Fan, et al. Therapeutic Targeting of Neuropilin-2 on Colorectal Carcinoma Cells Implanted in the Murine Liver J Natl Cancer Inst, January 16, 2008; 100(2): 109 - 120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]