gp100209–2M Peptide Immunization of Human Lymphocyte Antigen-A2+ Stage I-III Melanoma Patients Induces Significant Increase in Antigen-Specific Effector and Long-Term Memory CD8+ T Cells
- Edwin B. Walker1,
- Daniel Haley1,
- William Miller1,
- Kevin Floyd1,
- Ketura P. Wisner1,
- Nelson Sanjuan1,
- Holden Maecker3,
- Pedro Romero4,
- Hong-Ming Hu1,
- W. Gregory Alvord5,
- John W. Smith II1,
- Bernard A. Fox12 and
- Walter J. Urba1
- 1Robert W. Franz Cancer Research Center, Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, Oregon; 2Department of Molecular and Microbiology and Immunology, Oregon Heath and Science University, Portland, Oregon; 3Becton Dickinson Biosciences, San Jose, California; 4Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research-Division of Oncology-Immunology, Lausanne, Switzerland; and 5DMS–National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland
Abstract
Thirty-five HLA-A2+ patients with completely resected stage I-III melanoma were vaccinated multiple times over 6 months with a modified melanoma peptide, gp100209–2M, emulsified in Montanide adjuvant. Direct ex vivo gp100209–2M tetramer analysis of pre- and postvaccine peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) demonstrated significant increases in the frequency of tetramer+ CD8+ T cells after immunization for 33 of 35 evaluable patients (median, 0.36%; range, 0.05–8.9%). Ex vivo IFN-γ cytokine flow cytometry analysis of postvaccine PBMCs after brief gp100209–2M in vitro activation showed that for all of the patients studied tetramer+ CD8+ T cells produced IFN-γ; however, some patients had significant numbers of tetramer+ IFN-γ− CD8+T cells suggesting functional anergy. Additionally, 8 day gp100209–2M in vitro stimulation (IVS) of pre- and postvaccine PBMCs resulted in significant expansion of tetramer+ CD8+ T cells from postvaccine cells for 34 patients, and these IVS tetramer+ CD8+ T cells were functionally responsive by IFN-γ cytokine flow cytometry analysis after restimulation with either native or modified gp100 peptide. However, correlated functional and phenotype analysis of IVS-expanded postvaccine CD8+ T cells demonstrated the proliferation of functionally anergic gp100209–2M- tetramer+ CD8+ T cells in several patients and also indicated interpatient variability of gp100209–2M stimulated T-cell proliferation. Flow cytometry analysis of cryopreserved postvaccine PBMCs from representative patients showed that the majority of tetramer+ CD8+ T cells (78.1 ± 4.2%) had either an “effector” (CD45 RA+/CCR7−) or an “effector-memory” phenotype (CD45RA−/CCR7−). Notably, analysis of PBMCs collected 12–24 months after vaccine therapy demonstrated the durable presence of gp100209–2M-specific memory CD8+ T cells with high proliferation potential. Overall, this report demonstrates that after vaccination with a MHC class I-restricted melanoma peptide, resected nonmetastatic melanoma patients can mount a significant antigen-specific CD8+ T-cell immune response with a functionally intact memory component. The data further support the combined use of tetramer binding and functional assays in correlated ex vivo and IVS settings as a standard for immunomonitoring of cancer vaccine patients.
Footnotes
-
Grant support: Supported by NIH 1R21-CS82614-01 (W. J. U.), the M. J. Murdock Charitable Trust, and The Chiles Foundation.
-
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
-
Requests for reprints: Edwin B. Walker, Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Robert W. Franz Cancer Research Center, Providence Portland Medical Center, 4805 NE Glisan, 5F40, Portland, OR 97213. Phone: (503) 215-2620; Fax: (503) 215-6841; Email: edwin.walker{at}providence.org
-
↵6 S. L. Meijer, A. Dols, S. Jensen, H. M. Hu, W. Miller, E. B. Walker, P. Romero, B. A. Fox, and W. J. Urba. Antimelanoma activity of circulating CD8+ T cells following adjuvant vaccination of melanoma patients with gp100209–2M peptide, submitted for publication.
-
- Accepted November 20, 1903.
- Received August 26, 1903.
- Revision received November 18, 1903.










