Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

  • Register
  • Log in
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • OnlineFirst
    • Editors' Picks
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • AACR Publications
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • OnlineFirst
    • Editors' Picks
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
Human Cancer Biology

EGFRvIII Deletion Mutations in Pediatric High-Grade Glioma and Response to Targeted Therapy in Pediatric Glioma Cell Lines

Dorine A. Bax, Nathalie Gaspar, Suzanne E. Little, Lynley Marshall, Lara Perryman, Marie Regairaz, Marta Viana-Pereira, Raisa Vuononvirta, Swee Y. Sharp, Jorge S. Reis-Filho, João N. Stávale, Safa Al-Sarraj, Rui M. Reis, Gilles Vassal, Andrew D.J. Pearson, Darren Hargrave, David W. Ellison, Paul Workman and Chris Jones
Dorine A. Bax
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nathalie Gaspar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Suzanne E. Little
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lynley Marshall
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lara Perryman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marie Regairaz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marta Viana-Pereira
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raisa Vuononvirta
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Swee Y. Sharp
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jorge S. Reis-Filho
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
João N. Stávale
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Safa Al-Sarraj
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rui M. Reis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gilles Vassal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew D.J. Pearson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Darren Hargrave
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David W. Ellison
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Workman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chris Jones
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-3210 Published September 2009
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This article has a correction. Please see:

  • Correction: EGFRvIII Deletion Mutations in Pediatric High-Grade Glioma and Response to Targeted Therapy in Pediatric Glioma Cell Lines - November 15, 2009

Abstract

Purpose: The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is amplified and overexpressed in adult glioblastoma, with response to targeted inhibition dependent on the underlying biology of the disease. EGFR has thus far been considered to play a less important role in pediatric glioma, although extensive data are lacking. We have sought to clarify the role of EGFR in pediatric high-grade glioma (HGG).

Experimental Design: We retrospectively studied a total of 90 archival pediatric HGG specimens for EGFR protein overexpression, gene amplification, and mutation and assessed the in vitro sensitivity of pediatric glioma cell line models to the small-molecule EGFR inhibitor erlotinib.

Results: Amplification was detected in 11% of cases, with corresponding overexpression of the receptor. No kinase or extracellular domain mutations were observed; however, 6 of 35 (17%) cases harbored the EGFRvIII deletion, including two anaplastic oligodendrogliomas and a gliosarcoma overexpressing EGFRvIII in the absence of gene amplification and coexpressing platelet-derived growth factor receptor α. Pediatric glioblastoma cells transduced with wild-type or deletion mutant EGFRvIII were not rendered more sensitive to erlotinib despite expressing wild-type PTEN. Phosphorylated receptor tyrosine kinase profiling showed a specific activation of platelet-derived growth factor receptor α/β in EGFRvIII-transduced pediatric glioblastoma cells, and targeted coinhibition with erlotinib and imatinib leads to enhanced efficacy in this model.

Conclusions: These data identify an elevated frequency of EGFR gene amplification and EGFRvIII mutation in pediatric HGG than previously recognized and show the likely necessity of targeting multiple genetic alterations in the tumors of these children. (Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(18):5753–61)

  • EGFR
  • EGFRvIII
  • PTEN
  • erlotinib
  • resistance
  • coactivation

Translational Relevance

Dysregulation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is common in adult glioblastoma but has been considered less so in the pediatric setting, although unequivocal data have been lacking. This article details the largest and most comprehensive study of EGFR gene alterations in high-grade glioma of childhood yet undertaken. In addition to an elevated frequency of gene amplification in comparison with previous smaller series, we have identified for the first time the presence of EGFRvIII deletions in pediatric cases. By generating stably EGFRvIII-overexpressing pediatric glioblastoma cell lines, we show that the deletion is not sufficient to confer increased sensitivity to the EGFR inhibitor erlotinib due to the specific coactivation of platelet-derived growth factor receptor α/β in these cells. Thus, we provide evidence for a novel, pediatric-specific mechanism for erlotinib resistance in glioblastoma.

Amplification, overexpression, and/or mutation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) represent a compelling set of molecular genetic indicators for targeted therapy in adult glioblastoma. About 40% of glioblastomas show amplification of the EGFR gene locus, and about half of these tumors express a mutant receptor (EGFRvIII) that is constitutively active due to an in-frame truncation within the extracellular ligand-binding domain (1). In addition, novel missense mutations have been reported in the extracellular domain of tumors and cell lines (2), and recently, additional mutations have been described outside of these regions (e.g., in the transmembrane domains), although the significance of these is not yet clear (3).

EGFRvIII is caused by deletion of exons 2 to 7, resulting in a protein that lacks a ligand-binding domain and is constitutively activated and is further resistant to down-regulation due to a low rate of receptor endocytosis (4). EGFRvIII has been shown to confer enhanced tumorigenicity both in human glioma cells in vitro and in xenografts in immunodeprived mice (5, 6), and in a xenograft model, tumorigenicity is directly proportional to EGFRvIII receptor load (7). EGFRvIII has also been shown to confer resistance to both radiotherapy and chemotherapy (8, 9). Constitutive activation by EGFRvIII stimulates proliferation and inhibits apoptosis predominantly through stimulation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt pathway but also via the Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signal transduction pathway (10, 11). These data may explain the observation that patients with EGFRvIII-expressing tumors have a shorter interval to clinical relapse and poorer survival than patients with EGFRvIII-negative tumors (12).

Erlotinib (Tarceva, OSI-774) is a selective inhibitor of the EGFR tyrosine kinase and has shown activity in adult high-grade glioma (HGG) patients (13). A differential therapeutic response has been reported in these cases, with a variety of factors reported to be predictive for treatment efficacy, including activating mutations of EGFR and a wild-type PTEN (14, 15). Published preclinical data show equivocal results in adult glioblastoma model systems engineered to overexpress the deletion mutant. Erlotinib has been shown to inhibit EGFRvIII, blocking constitutive EGFRvIII kinase activity and the growth of EGFRvIII-transformed cells (15, 16). Furthermore, long-term exposure to erlotinib decreased EGFRvIII expression in transformed cells and selectively down-regulated the EGFRvIII-mediated induction of oncogenes that drive invasion in transformed glioblastoma cells (17). By contrast, other reports have shown that EGFR amplification/mutation even in the presence of functional PTEN did not render sensitivity to EGFR inhibitors (18, 19). This combination of alterations may therefore be necessary but not sufficient for conferring glioblastoma sensitivity to EGFR kinase inhibition (20). Consequently, one could infer the existence of additional determinants of glioblastoma sensitivity to EGFR kinase inhibition yet to be identified. For instance, activating mutations of PIK3CA, as recently shown in adult and pediatric glioblastomas, could account for tumor insensitivity to EGFR inhibition.

HGGs in children seem to be clinically and biologically distinct from their adult counterparts. Glioblastomas in adults are classified as primary or secondary based on progression from preexisting low-grade lesions and on distinct patterns of molecular abnormalities (21). Although some molecular abnormalities encountered in pediatric cases are reminiscent of secondary adult glioblastoma [TP53 mutation (22) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRα) overexpression (23)], these neoplasms rarely originate from preexisting low-grade lesions (24). Unfortunately, our understanding of these differences is restricted by the relative paucity of molecular data derived from pediatric tumors.

EGFR has been considered to play a less important role in pediatric HGG, although this issue is compounded by the limited available data. The receptor seems to be frequently overexpressed, usually in the absence of gene amplification, with reports varying from 10% to 80% of pediatric nonbrain stem HGGs (25–29). Interestingly, the primary site of the tumor may affect the type of genetic changes involved, with data indicating that TP53 mutation and EGFR overexpression are more frequent in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma than in supratentorial sites in children (25).

We have sought to clarify the role of EGFR in pediatric HGG and to assess the in vitro sensitivity of pediatric glioma cell line models to erlotinib. These data identify a higher prevalence of EGFR gene amplification and EGFRvIII mutation in pediatric HGG than previously recognized. We further investigated the potential of treatments targeting the receptor in deletion mutant-positive cases.

Materials and Methods

Tumor samples

HGG samples from 90 patients were obtained after approval by Local and Multicenter Ethical Review Committees. The collection consisted of 53 glioblastoma multiforme, 16 anaplastic astrocytomas, 3 anaplastic oligodendrogliomas, 3 brainstem gliomas, and 25 other WHO grade 3 or 4 lesions. All cases were archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. The presence of tumor tissue in these samples and the tumor type was verified on a H&E-stained section independently by two neuropathologists (D.W.E. and S.A-S.).

Immunohistochemistry and chromogenic in situ hybridization

Immunohistochemistry was done on representative 4- or 5-μm FFPE sections. EGFR overexpression was assessed using the mouse monoclonal antibody 31G7 (Zymed) at a dilution of 1:50 using the Envision-HRP system (K4006, Dako) as previously described (30). EGFRvIII was assessed using a 1:100 dilution of the mouse monoclonal antibody G100 (Zymed) as a primary and antigen retrieval by microwaving in 10 mmol/L citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for 3 × 5 min (31). PDGFRα was assessed using the polyclonal rabbit primary antibody RB-1691 (LabVision) at 1:150 dilution with 15 min antigen retrieval in 10 mmol/L citrate buffer (pH 6.0; ref. 32). Chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) was done using Spot-Light amplification probes for EGFR (Zymed) according to the manufacturer's protocol and as reported earlier (30). Cases were considered to be amplified for EGFR when >50% of the neoplastic cells harbored (a) more than five signals per nuclei or (b) large gene copy clusters. Immunohistochemical and CISH analyses were done with observers blinded to the results of EGFR and sequencing data.

Mutation analysis

Genomic DNA was isolated from representative 10-μm-thick unstained tissue sections containing >85% tumor cells, as determined from a serial H&E-stained section, using the QIAamp DNA Mini kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Exons 2 to 8, coding for the extracellular domain of EGFR, and exons 18 to 21, coding for the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) domain of EGFR, were amplified by PCR (33). Products were purified using the QIAquick PCR Purification kit and subjected to bidirectional sequencing using BigDye Terminator Mix 3.1 (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Capillary sequencing was done in duplicate on an ABI 3100 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems), and sequences were evaluated for the presence of mutations using Mutation Surveyor Software (SoftGenetics LLC). A reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) was developed for detection of the EGFRvIII mutation from FFPE sections. RNA was extracted from representative 10-μm-thick unstained tissue sections containing >85% tumor cells, as determined from a serial H&E-stained section, using the Recover-All kit (Ambion). cDNA was synthesized from 200 ng RNA using SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen Ltd.). The deletion region was amplified with primers in exon 1 (5′-GGGCTCTGGAGGAAAAGAAA-3′) and exon 9 (5′-CCTCCATCTCATAGCTGTCG-3′) amplifying a region of 91 bp when the deletion is present and 892 bp in the wild-type. The presence of the EGFRvIII fragment was confirmed in duplicate by direct sequencing.

Cell culture and generation of isogenic cell lines

Glioblastoma cell lines U87MG and KNS42 were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (LGC Promochem) and Japan Cancer Research Resources cell banks, respectively. SF188 was kindly provided by Dr. Daphne Haas-Kogan (University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA), whereas UW479, Res259, and Res186 were kindly provided by Dr. Michael Bobola (University of Washington, Seattle, WA). Cells were grown as monolayers in DMEM/F12 Ham's medium + 10% FCS in 5% CO2. EGFR constructs for isogenic cell lines were created by PCRs done using Phusion DNA polymerase enzyme (Finnzymes) to minimize the risk of error. Full-length wild-type EGFR was amplified from A431 cell line cDNA using the forward primer 5′-TCTTCGGCTAGCAACGATGCGACCCTC-3′ and the reverse primer 5′-ATGCGGCCGCTCATACTATCCTCCGTGGT-3′, which contained NheI and NotI enzyme restriction sites, respectively. The EGFRvIII mutant was created using splice overlapping extension PCR. Two PCRs were done to generate two fragments with overlapping ends surrounding the deleted region (exon 1: forward, 5′-TCTTCGGCTAGCAACGATGCGACCCTC-3′; reverse, 5′-TGTCACCACATAATTACCTTTCTTTTCCTCCAGAGCC-3′; exon 8: forward, 5′-GGAAAAGAAAGGTAATTATGTGGTGACAGATCACGGC-3′; reverse, 5′-GCCGCGTATGATTTCTAGATTCTCAAAGGC-3′). These fragments were then combined in a subsequent “fusion” PCR in which the overlapping ends annealed, allowing 3′ overlap of each strand to serve as a primer for the 3′ extension of the complementary strand. The result was a fragment of 499 bp with EGFRvIII deletion and NheI and XbaI restriction sites at the 3′ and 5′ ends. The remaining EGFR cDNA sequence was amplified using forward primer 5′-GAATCTAGAAATCATACGCGGCAGGACC-3′ and reverse primer 5′-ATGCGGCCGCTCATACTATCCTCCGTGGT-3′, which contained XbaI and NotI enzyme restriction sites. The vector F527 (34) was digested by NheI and NotI and the PCR fragments by the enzyme corresponding to their restriction sites. The cDNA fragment was then extracted from an agarose gel and purified using the QIAquick Gel Extraction kit (Qiagen). The ligation of inserts and vector F527 was done using T4 DNA ligase (Invitrogen). Electrocompetent XL1 blue Escherichia coli (kindly provided by Betsy Julienne, Institut de Cancérologie Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France) was transformed by electroporation in the presence of the ligation products, and selection was done by bacterial culture on ampicillin LB agar Petri dishes. Colonies showing the correct orientation by restriction digestion were further designated to sequencing. The DNA from plasmid with the correct sequence was then efficiently isolated from E. coli using Maxiprep using the PureLink HiPure Plasmid Filter Purification kit (Invitrogen). U87MG and SF188 were then transfected with either the F527 empty vector, or F527-EGFR wild-type or F527-EGFRvIII plasmids using Lipofectamine (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Stable clones were obtained after 4 wk of antibiotic selection by 1 μg/mL puromycin.

Western blot analysis

Cells at 80% confluence were trypsinized, washed with PBS, and lysed for 1 h at 4°C in lysis buffer (Cell Signaling) and a complete mini protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics). Cells were then centrifuged at 11,000 rpm at 4°C for 15 min, and protein concentration was determined (bicinchoninic acid assay, Pierce). Total protein extracts (30 μg/lane) were separated electrophoretically in 4% to 20% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Invitrogen). Immunodetection was done using antibodies directed against EGFR, phosphorylated and total extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2, phosphorylated/total Akt, and PTEN (all 1:1,000; Cell Signaling) as well as glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (1:2,000; Chemicon). Blots were revealed with peroxidase-conjugated secondary anti-rabbit or anti-mouse antibodies (GE Healthcare) followed by enhanced chemiluminescence solution (GE Healthcare).

Detection of phosphorylated RTKs

The levels of phosphorylated and total wild-type EGFR were determined from 2.5 μg of protein lysate by an electrochemiluminescent immunoassay (MesoScale Discovery) according to the manufacturer's instructions. A phosphorylated RTK assay (R&D Systems) was used to screen multiple RTKs. Cells were lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation assay lysis buffer (Cell Signaling) and a complete mini protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics), as described for Western blot analysis. Phosphorylated PDGFRα/β was measured in a sandwich ELISA assay (Cell Signaling) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Growth inhibition studies

Erlotinib (Euroasian Chemicals PVT Ltd.), imatinib (LC Laboratories), the dual PI3K and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor PI-103 (provided by Piramed Ltd.), and the MAPK/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor PD325901 (provided by Dundee University, Dundee, United Kingdom) were obtained in powder form and diluted in either DMSO or water at 10 mmol/L stock solutions. Growth inhibition was determined using the sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay as described previously (35). Briefly, 103 cells were seeded into 96-well microtiter plates and allowed to attach for 36 h. Compounds at a range of concentrations were added in quadruplicate wells for 6 d (at least three doubling times) in a volume of 200 μL/well. Cells were then fixed with ice-cold 10% trichloroacetic acid for 30 min, then washed with tap water, and dried. The plates were subsequently stained with 0.4% SRB in 1% acetic acid for 15 min, and excess stain was washed off with 1% acetic acid. After the plates were dried, the stain was solubilized with 10 mmol/L Tris base, and the absorbance was determined at 570 nm. The IC50 was calculated as the drug concentration that inhibits cell growth by 50% compared with control growth using GraphPad Prism 4 program (GraphPad Software). All values are given as mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments.

Statistical analysis

All statistical tests were done in R2.6.1.10 Correlations between categorical values were done using the χ2 and Fisher's exact tests. Correlations between continuous variables were done using Student's t test or the Mann-Whitney U test. Cumulative survival probabilities were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with differences between survival rates analyzed with the log-rank test. All tests were two tailed, with a confidence interval of 95%. P values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

EGFR is amplified and overexpressed in pediatric HGGs

We collected a series of 90 HGGs from patients under the age of 19 years (median, 11.3 years) for molecular analysis. All samples were archival FFPE pathology specimens, with variable quantity and quality of material available as sections for immunohistochemistry or DNA/RNA extraction. To evaluate gene dosage and receptor expression of EGFR, we used CISH and immunohistochemistry on tissue sections.

We observed gene amplification in 8 of 74 (11%) evaluable cases. These consisted of 6 glioblastomas (6 of 43, 14%) and 2 anaplastic astrocytomas (2 of 11, 18%). No amplifications were seen in any other high-grade lesion. Polysomy of chromosome 7 was noted in an additional 14 of 74 (19%) cases and included 10 cases of glioblastoma, 3 anaplastic astrocytoma, and a gliosarcoma.

These amplifications were mostly present as dense clusters of nuclear signals representing a high-level DNA copy number gain in the vast majority of the tumor cells (Fig. 1, RMH2457); however, additional patterns were also observed. These included discrete signals at a copy number of 9 to 10 per nucleus, observed in a case of anaplastic astrocytoma (Fig. 1, RMH2480), or high-density clusters, present only in scattered cells throughout the tumor, in a glioblastoma (Fig. 1, RMH2449).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

EGFR expression and amplification in pediatric HGG. H&E-stained sections, immunohistochemistry for wild-type EGFR, and EGFR CISH for three representative cases of pediatric HGG. Amplifications were present either as discrete signals at a copy number of 9 to 10 per nucleus (RMH2480), in scattered cells throughout the tumor (RMH2449), or in dense clusters in the vast majority of the tumor cells (RMH2457).

All cases of pediatric HGG harboring EGFR amplification were found to express the protein at high levels (Fig. 1). There was no association between EGFR amplification and clinical outcome (P = 0.457, log-rank test for overall survival) or age at diagnosis (P = 0.591, Mann-Whitney U test).

Pediatric HGGs harbor vIII deletions but no activating mutations in the extracellular or kinase domains

We further screened our pediatric HGG cases for mutations in the EGFR gene. Previously reported activating mutations in the kinase domain (in non–small cell lung cancer and others) and the extracellular domain (adult glioblastoma) were screened by PCR amplification of exonic sequences and direct sequencing. We observed no mutations in 60 (kinase domain) and 66 (extracellular domain) pediatric cases. Although the lack of kinase domain mutations is consistent with data from adult glioblastoma, the absence of extracellular domain mutations in our pediatric series is significantly discordant with the published frequency of 18 of 132 (13.6%; ref. 2) in adult glioblastoma (P = 0.0019, Fisher's exact test).

In addition, we developed a RT-PCR assay applicable to FFPE samples to screen for the presence of the EGFRvIII deletion mutation. A product of 91 bp spanning exons 1 and 8 was generated from extracted mRNA in cases harboring deletion of exons 2 to 7, which was verified by direct sequencing (Fig. 2). We detected six cases of EGFRvIII in 35 assessable cases (17%). These included 1 of 20 (5%) glioblastoma, a single case of gliosarcoma, and an increased frequency in anaplastic astrocytoma (2 of 6, 33%) and anaplastic oligodendroglioma (2 of 3, 67%). Despite the small numbers, these latter cases had a statistically significant increased frequency compared with other pediatric HGG (P = 0.036, Fisher's exact test). Interestingly, the glioblastoma and anaplastic astrocytoma cases were EGFR amplified, whereas the anaplastic oligodendroglioma and gliosarcomas were not. A summary of mutation data is given in Table 1.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Detection of EGFRvIII deletions in pediatric HGG. A, lane 3, RT-PCR amplifying a product of 91 bp in EGFRvIII-positive cases. B, sequencing of the RT-PCR product established the presence of sequence spanning exons 1 and 8 of the EGFR gene.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Summary of EGFR mutations in pediatric HGGs

Pediatric glioma cell lines and response to erlotinib

In addition to the primary tumors, we also screened our panel of pediatric glioma cell lines for EGFR mutations as described above. None of five lines harbored any point mutations, deletions, or amplifications nor significant levels of protein or mRNA expression of the receptor (data not shown). Treatment with the small-molecule EGFR inhibitor erlotinib revealed a general lack of sensitivity, with an IC50 of >50 μmol/L for most of the pediatric cell lines. The most sensitive cell line was the glioblastoma SF188 line (IC50 = 8.3 ± 0.7 μmol/L) derived from an 8-year-old male patient, which is PTEN wild-type and harbors mutant TP53.11

Therefore, to study the effects of EGFR overexpression and vIII deletion on pediatric glioma cells, we constructed isogenic cell line models using the PTEN wild-type pediatric glioblastoma cell line SF188 as well as the PTEN-deleted adult glioblastoma line U87MG. We successfully transduced either EGFR wild-type or vIII into both cell lines, resulting in stable protein overexpression (Fig. 3A). Treatment of these cell line models with erlotinib inhibited both PI3K and MAPK pathways and induced a G1 arrest in all cells (Supplementary Fig. S1) but revealed no statistically significant differences in efficacy between EGFR-transduced (wild-type and vIII) and parental/empty vector for both U87MG and SF188 (Fig. 3B). Isolated clones showed a modest (2-fold) increase in sensitivity when overexpressing the vIII deletion in both cell lines; however, this was not generalizable. This was despite showing that vIII-transduced cells harbored constitutive activation of the receptor, as determined by an electrochemiluminescent immunoassay (detecting transactivation of the endogenous EGFR rather than the mutant) and also phosphorylated RTK array analysis (detecting both wild-type and deletion mutant phosphorylation directly).

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Glioblastoma cell lines stably overexpressing the EGFRvIII deletion mutant have constitutive activation but not increased sensitivity to erlotinib. A, expression of EGFR and PTEN by Western blot in adult (U87MG) and pediatric (SF188) glioblastoma cell lines stably expressing EGFR wild-type (185 kDa) and vIII deletion mutation (145 kDa). U87MG cells are PTEN deleted, and SF188 cells express the wild-type protein. B, sensitivity of the isogenic cell lines to erlotinib, as determined by the SRB assay. There were no statistically significant differences in the IC50 values of any of the cell lines. C, constitutive activation of the receptor, in EGFRvIII-overexpressing cell lines. Absolute counts for total and phosphorylated EGFR are plotted on a log10 scale. D, percentage of phosphorylated EGFR to total protein, as determined by an electrochemiluminescent immunoassay, in the isogenic cell line models.

Mechanisms of resistance to erlotinib in SF188 cells

As EGFR signals through both PI3K and MAPK, we sought to determine whether the presence of either wild-type or mutant EGFR would render glioblastoma cells more sensitive to agents inhibiting these pathways. Regardless of PTEN status, there was no consistent change in efficacy of EGFR-transduced U87MG or SF188 cells with the dual PI3K/mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor PI-103 (Fig. 4A; refs. 36, 37) or the MEK inhibitor PD325901 (Fig. 4B).

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Pediatric glioblastoma cell lines transduced with wild-type or vIII deletion mutant EGFR were not rendered more sensitive to inhibitors of the PI3K or MAPK pathways. Response of transduced U87MG and SF188 cells to inhibitors of PI3K/mammalian target of rapamycin (PI-103; A) and MEK (PD325901; B), as determined by the SRB assay. There were no statistically significant differences in the IC50 values of any of the cell lines.

We next focused on the pediatric SF188 line to investigate the possible biological basis for the lack of increased efficacy of erlotinib in EGFR-overexpressing clones despite these cells harboring wild-type PTEN. Selecting the most erlotinib-sensitive clones transduced by EGFR, we first showed that there was no difference in response to small-molecule inhibition due to either mutant or wild-type EGFR expression over a period of 72 hours despite a modest diminution of downstream signaling in the EGFR mutant SF188 cells (data not shown).

In U87MG cells, there is coactivation of EGFR and MET, which allows for continued oncogenic RTK signaling in the presence of small-molecule inhibition of EGFR (38, 39). To look for similar association in our pediatric glioma cells, we assayed the SF188 clones with phosphorylated RTK antibody arrays (Fig. 5). There was only very low levels of constitutive EGFR activation in the control cells, reflecting the data from the electrochemiluminescent immunoassay (Fig. 3C and D), and no additional RTK activation. There was an increase in phosphorylated EGFR on transduction with the wild-type receptor and a further significant increase on constitutive activation by the EGFRvIII deletion mutant. In concert with this, we observed a significant up-regulation of phosphorylated PDGFRα and PDGFRβ as well as a modest increase in activated MER, Tie-2, and Flt-3 (Fig. 5A). The increased levels of phosphorylated PDGFRAα/β were confirmed by a sandwich ELISA assay in our SF188 model (Supplementary Fig. S2) and were not seen in U87MG:EGFR wild-type or vIII mutant-overexpressing cells (data not shown). Four of the six (50%) pediatric HGG samples positive for EGFRvIII also showed strong expression of PDGFRα protein by immunohistochemistry (Fig. 5B), a greater frequency than the population as a whole (36%). Intriguingly, these four cases included all those EGFRvIII-positive cases in the absence of gene amplification (both anaplastic oligodendrogliomas and a gliosarcoma) as well as an anaplastic astrocytoma. The number of positive cases was too small to assign a statistical association (P = 0.14, Fisher's exact test) but shows the cosegregation of these abnormalities in the clinical setting.

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Coactivation of PDGFRα/β in SF188 cells stably expressing EGFRvIII. A, phosphorylated RTK array analysis of isogenic SF188 cells shows low levels of constitutive EGFR activation in the control cells, and no additional RTK activation, in contrast to a large increase on constitutive activation by the EGFRvIII deletion mutant in association with a significant up-regulation of phosphorylated PDGFRα and PDGFRβ (also seen to a lesser extent with the wild-type receptor) as well as MER, Tie-2, and Flt-3. B, immunohistochemistry for EGFRvIII and PDGFRα in a case of pediatric gliosarcoma (RMH2473) showing coexpression of the receptors in the clinical setting. C, coinhibition of EGFR and PDGFR by erlotinib and imatinib showed a significant decrease in SF188:EGFRvIII cell viability than either compound alone (P < 0.01, t test).

Finally, we tested whether inhibition of PDGFR would enhance the sensitivity of these cells to erlotinib treatment. We measured cell viability of the SF188:EGFRvIII cells treated with a fixed dose of 10 μmol/L erlotinib alone and in combination with 10 μmol/L imatinib. Treatment with a combination of both small molecules showed a significant decrease in cell viability compared with either compound alone (P < 0.01, t test; Fig. 5C).

Discussion

Although the oncogenic significance of activated EGFR signaling is well established in primary adult glioblastoma, in the pediatric setting the picture is less clear. We have carried out the largest molecular analysis to date of EGFR in the HGGs of childhood and identified the presence of the EGFRvIII deletion mutation in pediatric cases.

EGFRvIII was noted in WHO grade 4 glioblastoma and WHO grade 3 anaplastic astrocytoma cases in association with gene amplification and receptor overexpression. The few previous reports on EGFR in pediatric gliomas suggested that amplification was less common in pediatric glioblastomas than in adults, although the frequency in these small series ranged from 0% to 25%, measured using a variety of different assays on differing collections of tumor histologies (25–29). We observed an overall frequency of 11% amplification, with up to 14% in glioblastoma and 18% in anaplastic astrocytoma. Of particular interest was the observation that in some cases the high-density clusters of amplified probe signal were seen only in scattered cells throughout the tumor. This may explain the underestimation reported in earlier studies and highlights the benefit of using a technique such as CISH to determine gene amplification, as it allows histologic evaluation concurrent with the molecular analysis.

We further observed EGFRvIII expression, in the absence of gene amplification, in two of three WHO grade 3 anaplastic oligodendrogliomas and a single case of WHO grade 4 gliosarcoma. Although there are no reports to our knowledge on the presence of EGFRvIII in pediatric anaplastic oligodendrogliomas, the deletion has previously been identified in an adult case (40), and more recently, we have observed 2 of 24 adult cases to harbor the deletion (31). Both of these studies further reported that the mutant receptor was amplified, and the significance of our findings of EGFRvIII expression in the absence of amplification is not clear; however, it may be significant that these anaplastic oligodendroglioma cases also had strong PDGFRα expression, as genomic alterations in EGFR and PDGFRA tend to be mutually exclusive in pediatric glioblastomas (41). Intriguingly, in a mouse model genetically engineered to express both EGFRvIII and Ras under a GFAP promoter, GFAP-V(12)Ha-ras;GFAP-EGFRvIII, but not GFAP-V(12)Ha-ras;GFAP-EGFR(wt) double transgenic mice, had decreased survival and developed oligodendrogliomas and mixed oligoastrocytoma tumors, instead of the fibrillary astrocytomas observed in GFAP-V(12)Ha-ras mice (6). The role of EGFR, and specifically the vIII deletion mutant, remains to be clarified in anaplastic oligodendroglioma, and assessing the translational significance in children is hampered by a lack of cell line models.

Activating mutations in the kinase domain of EGFR predict for sensitivity to small molecular inhibitors in tumors such as non–small cell lung cancer; however, these have not been reported in adult glioblastomas, and their absence from our pediatric series was not unexpected. By contrast, the identification of oncogenic point mutations in the extracellular domains in adult glioblastoma, and the resultant efficacy of receptor-targeting strategies, led to the expectation that we may also observe these base changes in childhood cases. The lack of such mutations once again serves to highlight the potential biological differences between gliomas arising at different ages.

Expression of the EGFRvIII mutant in association with wild-type PTEN has been reported to predict for sensitivity to small-molecule EGFR inhibitors, such as erlotinib, in the clinic (15), although in some model systems constitutive EGFR activation did not render the glioblastoma cells sensitive. We sought to clarify the situation in the childhood disease by screening a series of well-characterised11 glioma cell lines derived from pediatric patients for in vitro sensitivity to erlotinib. These lines, consisting of both PTEN null and wild-type, all expressed EGFR at only low levels and were relatively insensitive to small-molecule inhibition by erlotinib. Transduction of the PTEN-expressing pediatric glioblastoma cell line SF188 with EGFRvIII did not greatly enhance the effects of erlotinib on cell viability nor downstream signaling.

EGFRvIII and the wild-type receptor have recently been shown to differentially activate downstream pathways, suggesting that therapeutic approaches toward tumors expressing these two distinct receptors should be fundamentally different (38). The expectation that targeting the MAPK pathway in wild-type EGFR, and the PI3K pathway in EGFRvIII-expressing cells, was not borne out by our data with engineered SF188 or U87MG cells, although in part this may be explained by the significant transactivation of the wild-type receptor in cells transduced with the mutant.

Previous reports have shown that coexpression of EGFRvIII and PTEN in U87MG cells rendered them highly susceptible to growth arrest by erlotinib compared with controls and U87 cells transfected with EGFR wild-type and EGFRvIII alone (15). In common with a recent study using a panel of serially propagated glioblastoma xenografts (20), it seems from our experiments with pediatric SF188 cells that the combination of PTEN expression with EGFRvIII mutation may be insufficient to confer obligate sensitivity to the small-molecule inhibitor.

The above data strongly suggest the presence of additional determinants of sensitivity to EGFR inhibitors in SF188 cells and possibly to pediatric HGGs in the clinic. The recent discovery of activating mutations in PI3K family member genes, such as PIK3CA and PIK3R1, in malignant glioma reiterates the importance of multiple mechanisms to increase signaling through this pathway (3, 42). SF188 harbors amplification at chromosome 12q14 of several genes, including CDK4 and CENTG1, also known as the PI3K enhancer PIKE-A (43), a ubiquitously expressed GTPase, which binds to and enhances Akt kinase activity in a guanine nucleotide–dependent manner (44). Additional genomic aberrations in SF188 include amplification of MYC at 8q24,11 which can be stabilized by PI3K (45) and provides an additional attenuation of this pathway in SF188 cells. Both amplification events have been reported in pediatric glioblastoma patient samples (43, 46).

Coactivation of RTKs, and the concept of “kinase switching,” is an emerging concept that may additionally explain the lack of efficacy of agents targeting activated RTKs, such as EGFR. In adult glioblastoma, EGFR and MET seem frequently to be coactivated, with in vitro data supporting cotargeting both receptors (39). Furthermore, in adult glioblastoma models, the MET receptor seems strongly phosphorylated as a function of EGFRvIII levels. This has been hypothesized to be a result of an intermediary signaling component such as Src, as has been postulated for human bladder carcinoma (38). In the pediatric SF188 cells, we observed a significant activation of the closely related PDGFRs PDGFRα and PDGFRβ on transduction with EGFRvIII (and to a lesser extent with the wild-type receptor). We have previously reported high levels of Src family kinase expression in pediatric glioma cell lines, and SF188 in particular,11 and the role of these key regulators of signal transduction in the transactivation and/or switching between constitutively activated EGFRvIII and PDGFRα/β warrants further investigation.

The identification of EGFRvIII deletions in pediatric HGGs and the possible resistance mechanisms to EGFR inhibitors conferred by known oncogenic amplifications have significant translational potential. In particular, PDGFRs are overexpressed at high frequency in pediatric glioblastomas, and specifically with three of six EGFRvIII-positive cases in this study, and this may be due to a differential, amplification-independent mechanism of action in anaplastic oligodendrogliomas. Coupled with evidence of enhanced efficacy from our in vitro model systems, these data provide a strong rationale for cotargeting with small-molecule inhibitors of both RTKs, potentially overcoming resistance to single agents in appropriate patient cohorts (47).

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

P. Workman is employed by, has received a commercial research grant from, has an ownership interest in, and is a consultant for Piramed Pharma.

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs. Daphne Haas-Kogan and Michael Bobola for provision of the pediatric glioma cell lines, Steve Hobbs for assistance with the F527 vector, Alice Smith (The Institute of Cancer Research) for assistance with sequencing, and Sharon Gowan for assistance with the electrochemiluminescent assay.

Footnotes

  • Grant support:Cancer Research UK grants C1178/A10294, C309/A2187, and C309/A8274; Oak Foundation (L. Marshall); La Fondation de France (N. Gaspar); and Breakthrough Breast Cancer (J.S. Reis-Filho). We acknowledge NHS funding to the National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre. P. Workman is a Cancer Research UK Life Fellow.

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Clinical Cancer Research Online (http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/).

  • ↵10http://www.r-project.org/

  • ↵11D.A. Bax et al. Molecular and phenotypic characterisation of paediatric glioma cell lines as models for preclinical drug development, submitted for publication.

    • Received December 10, 2008.
    • Revision received June 4, 2009.
    • Accepted June 17, 2009.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Chu CT,
    2. Everiss KD,
    3. Wikstrand CJ,
    4. Batra SK,
    5. Kung HJ,
    6. Bigner DD
    . Receptor dimerization is not a factor in the signalling activity of a transforming variant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFRvIII). Biochem J 1997;324:855–61.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Lee JC,
    2. Vivanco I,
    3. Beroukhim R,
    4. et al
    . Epidermal growth factor receptor activation in glioblastoma through novel missense mutations in the extracellular domain. PLoS Med 2006;3:e485.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. McLendon R,
    2. Friedman A,
    3. Bigner D,
    4. et al
    . Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature 2008.
  4. ↵
    1. Grandal MV,
    2. Zandi R,
    3. Pedersen MW,
    4. Willumsen BM,
    5. van Deurs B,
    6. Poulsen HS
    . EGFRvIII escapes down-regulation due to impaired internalization and sorting to lysosomes. Carcinogenesis 2007;28:1408–17.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Cavenee WK
    . Genetics and new approaches to cancer therapy. Carcinogenesis 2002;23:683–6.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Ding H,
    2. Shannon P,
    3. Lau N,
    4. et al
    . Oligodendrogliomas result from the expression of an activated mutant epidermal growth factor receptor in a RAS transgenic mouse astrocytoma model. Cancer Res 2003;63:1106–13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Johns TG,
    2. Perera RM,
    3. Vernes SC,
    4. et al
    . The efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor-specific antibodies against glioma xenografts is influenced by receptor levels, activation status, and heterodimerization. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:1911–25.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Lammering G,
    2. Valerie K,
    3. Lin PS,
    4. Hewit TH,
    5. Schmidt-Ullrich RK
    . Radiation-induced activation of a common variant of EGFR confers enhanced radioresistance. Radiother Oncol 2004;72:267–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Nagane M,
    2. Levitzki A,
    3. Gazit A,
    4. Cavenee WK,
    5. Huang HJ
    . Drug resistance of human glioblastoma cells conferred by a tumor-specific mutant epidermal growth factor receptor through modulation of Bcl-XL and caspase-3-like proteases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998;95:5724–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Moscatello DK,
    2. Holgado-Madruga M,
    3. Emlet DR,
    4. Montgomery RB,
    5. Wong AJ
    . Constitutive activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase by a naturally occurring mutant epidermal growth factor receptor. J Biol Chem 1998;273:200–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Klingler-Hoffmann M,
    2. Fodero-Tavoletti MT,
    3. Mishima K,
    4. et al
    . The protein tyrosine phosphatase TCPTP suppresses the tumorigenicity of glioblastoma cells expressing a mutant epidermal growth factor receptor. J Biol Chem 2001;276:46313–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Feldkamp MM,
    2. Lala P,
    3. Lau N,
    4. Roncari L,
    5. Guha A
    . Expression of activated epidermal growth factor receptors, Ras-guanosine triphosphate, and mitogen-activated protein kinase in human glioblastoma multiforme specimens. Neurosurgery 1999;45:1442–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Halatsch ME,
    2. Schmidt U,
    3. Behnke-Mursch J,
    4. Unterberg A,
    5. Wirtz CR
    . Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme and other malignant brain tumours. Cancer Treat Rev 2006;32:74–89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Haas-Kogan DA,
    2. Prados MD,
    3. Tihan T,
    4. et al
    . Epidermal growth factor receptor, protein kinase B/Akt, and glioma response to erlotinib. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:880–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Mellinghoff IK,
    2. Wang MY,
    3. Vivanco I,
    4. et al
    . Molecular determinants of the response of glioblastomas to EGFR kinase inhibitors. N Engl J Med 2005;353:2012–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Mellinghoff IK,
    2. Cloughesy TF,
    3. Mischel PS
    . PTEN-mediated resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor kinase inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:378–81.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Lal A,
    2. Glazer CA,
    3. Martinson HM,
    4. et al
    . Mutant epidermal growth factor receptor up-regulates molecular effectors of tumor invasion. Cancer Res 2002;62:3335–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Learn CA,
    2. Hartzell TL,
    3. Wikstrand CJ,
    4. et al
    . Resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibition by mutant epidermal growth factor receptor variant III contributes to the neoplastic phenotype of glioblastoma multiforme. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:3216–24.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Fan QW,
    2. Knight ZA,
    3. Goldenberg DD,
    4. et al
    . A dual PI3 kinase/mTOR inhibitor reveals emergent efficacy in glioma. Cancer Cell 2006;9:341–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Sarkaria JN,
    2. Carlson BL,
    3. Schroeder MA,
    4. et al
    . Use of an orthotopic xenograft model for assessing the effect of epidermal growth factor receptor amplification on glioblastoma radiation response. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:2264–71.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Kleihues P,
    2. Cavenee WK
    . Pathology and genetics of tumors of the nervous system. Lyon: IARC Press; 2000.
  22. ↵
    1. Pollack IF,
    2. Finkelstein SD,
    3. Woods J,
    4. et al
    . Expression of p53 and prognosis in children with malignant gliomas. N Engl J Med 2002;346:420–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Nakamura M,
    2. Shimada K,
    3. Ishida E,
    4. et al
    . Molecular pathogenesis of pediatric astrocytic tumors. Neuro Oncol 2007;9:113–23.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Broniscer A,
    2. Baker SJ,
    3. West AN,
    4. et al
    . Clinical and molecular characteristics of malignant transformation of low-grade glioma in children. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:682–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Gilbertson RJ,
    2. Hill DA,
    3. Hernan R,
    4. et al
    . ERBB1 is amplified and overexpressed in high-grade diffusely infiltrative pediatric brain stem glioma. Clin Cancer Res 2003;9:3620–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Bredel M,
    2. Pollack IF,
    3. Hamilton RL,
    4. James CD
    . Epidermal growth factor receptor expression and gene amplification in high-grade non-brainstem gliomas of childhood. Clin Cancer Res 1999;5:1786–92.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Pollack IF,
    2. Hamilton RL,
    3. James CD,
    4. et al
    . Rarity of PTEN deletions and EGFR amplification in malignant gliomas of childhood: results from the Children's Cancer Group 945 cohort. J Neurosurg 2006;105:418–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Liang ML,
    2. Ma J,
    3. Ho M,
    4. et al
    . Tyrosine kinase expression in pediatric high grade astrocytoma. J Neurooncol 2008;87:247–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Korshunov A,
    2. Sycheva R,
    3. Gorelyshev S,
    4. Golanov A
    . Clinical utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in nonbrainstem glioblastomas of childhood. Mod Pathol 2005;18:1258–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Little SE,
    2. Bax DA,
    3. Rodriguez-Pinilla M,
    4. et al
    . Multifaceted dysregulation of the epidermal growth factor receptor pathway in clear cell sarcoma of the kidney. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:4360–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Viana-Pereira M,
    2. Lopes JM,
    3. Little S,
    4. et al
    . Analysis of EGFR overexpression, EGFR gene amplification and the EGFRvIII mutation in Portuguese high-grade gliomas. Anticancer Res 2008;28:913–20.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Puputti M,
    2. Tynninen O,
    3. Sihto H,
    4. et al
    . Amplification of KIT, PDGFRA, VEGFR2, and EGFR in gliomas. Mol Cancer Res 2006;4:927–34.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Reis-Filho JS,
    2. Milanezi F,
    3. Carvalho S,
    4. et al
    . Metaplastic breast carcinomas exhibit EGFR, but not HER2, gene amplification and overexpression: immunohistochemical and chromogenic in situ hybridization analysis. Breast Cancer Res 2005;7:R1028–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Hobbs S,
    2. Jitrapakdee S,
    3. Wallace JC
    . Development of a bicistronic vector driven by the human polypeptide chain elongation factor 1α promoter for creation of stable mammalian cell lines that express very high levels of recombinant proteins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1998;252:368–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Skehan P,
    2. Storeng R,
    3. Scudiero D,
    4. et al
    . New colorimetric cytotoxicity assay for anticancer-drug screening. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990;82:1107–12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Hayakawa M,
    2. Kaizawa H,
    3. Moritomo H,
    4. et al
    . Synthesis and biological evaluation of pyrido[3′,2′:4,5]furo[3,2-d]pyrimidine derivatives as novel PI3 kinase p110α inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2007;17:2438–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Raynaud FI,
    2. Eccles S,
    3. Clarke PA,
    4. et al
    . Pharmacologic characterization of a potent inhibitor of class I phosphatidylinositide 3-kinases. Cancer Res 2007;67:5840–50.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Huang PH,
    2. Cavenee WK,
    3. Furnari FB,
    4. White FM
    . Uncovering therapeutic targets for glioblastoma: a systems biology approach. Cell Cycle 2007;6:2750–4.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Stommel JM,
    2. Kimmelman AC,
    3. Ying H,
    4. et al
    . Coactivation of receptor tyrosine kinases affects the response of tumor cells to targeted therapies. Science 2007.
  37. ↵
    1. Reifenberger J,
    2. Reifenberger G,
    3. Ichimura K,
    4. Schmidt EE,
    5. Wechsler W,
    6. Collins VP
    . Epidermal growth factor receptor expression in oligodendroglial tumors. Am J Pathol 1996;149:29–35.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Wong KK,
    2. Tsang YT,
    3. Chang YM,
    4. et al
    . Genome-wide allelic imbalance analysis of pediatric gliomas by single nucleotide polymorphic allele array. Cancer Res 2006;66:11172–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    1. Parsons DW,
    2. Jones S,
    3. Zhang X,
    4. et al
    . An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme. Science 2008;321:1807–12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Knobbe CB,
    2. Trampe-Kieslich A,
    3. Reifenberger G
    . Genetic alteration and expression of the phosphoinositol-3-kinase/Akt pathway genes PIK3CA and PIKE in human glioblastomas. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2005;31:486–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Liu X,
    2. Hu Y,
    3. Hao C,
    4. Rempel SA,
    5. Ye K
    . PIKE-A is a proto-oncogene promoting cell growth, transformation and invasion. Oncogene 2007;26:4918–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Kumar A,
    2. Marques M,
    3. Carrera AC
    . Phosphoinositide 3-kinase activation in late G1 is required for c-Myc stabilization and S phase entry. Mol Cell Biol 2006;26:9116–25.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    1. Kucerova H,
    2. Stejskalova E,
    3. Vicha A,
    4. et al
    . Gene aberrations in childhood brain tumors. Folia Biol (Praha) 2000;46:187–90.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Workman P
    . Drugging the cancer genome: new challenges of infrequent and combinatorial targets. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 2007;8:445–6.
    OpenUrlPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Clinical Cancer Research: 15 (18)
September 2009
Volume 15, Issue 18
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Clinical Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
EGFRvIII Deletion Mutations in Pediatric High-Grade Glioma and Response to Targeted Therapy in Pediatric Glioma Cell Lines
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical Cancer Research.
Citation Tools
EGFRvIII Deletion Mutations in Pediatric High-Grade Glioma and Response to Targeted Therapy in Pediatric Glioma Cell Lines
Dorine A. Bax, Nathalie Gaspar, Suzanne E. Little, Lynley Marshall, Lara Perryman, Marie Regairaz, Marta Viana-Pereira, Raisa Vuononvirta, Swee Y. Sharp, Jorge S. Reis-Filho, João N. Stávale, Safa Al-Sarraj, Rui M. Reis, Gilles Vassal, Andrew D.J. Pearson, Darren Hargrave, David W. Ellison, Paul Workman and Chris Jones
Clin Cancer Res September 15 2009 (15) (18) 5753-5761; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-3210

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
EGFRvIII Deletion Mutations in Pediatric High-Grade Glioma and Response to Targeted Therapy in Pediatric Glioma Cell Lines
Dorine A. Bax, Nathalie Gaspar, Suzanne E. Little, Lynley Marshall, Lara Perryman, Marie Regairaz, Marta Viana-Pereira, Raisa Vuononvirta, Swee Y. Sharp, Jorge S. Reis-Filho, João N. Stávale, Safa Al-Sarraj, Rui M. Reis, Gilles Vassal, Andrew D.J. Pearson, Darren Hargrave, David W. Ellison, Paul Workman and Chris Jones
Clin Cancer Res September 15 2009 (15) (18) 5753-5761; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-3210
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Contact Guidance Controls T-cell Migration in PDAC
  • MET in Papillary RCC
  • Identification of T-cell Antigens by Minigene Screening
Show more Human Cancer Biology
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • CCR Focus Archive
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians
  • Reviewers

About Clinical Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2018 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Clinical Cancer Research
eISSN: 1557-3265
ISSN: 1078-0432

Advertisement