Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

  • Register
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
  • AACR Publications
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
Review

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Oxaliplatin: A Critical Review

Martin A. Graham, Graham F. Lockwood, Dennis Greenslade, Silvano Brienza, Martine Bayssas and Erick Gamelin
Martin A. Graham
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Graham F. Lockwood
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dennis Greenslade
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Silvano Brienza
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martine Bayssas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erick Gamelin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI:  Published April 2000
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Oxaliplatin (cis-[(1R,2R)-1,2-cyclohexanediamine-N,N′] oxalato(2-)-O,O′] platinum; Eloxatine) is a novel platinum coordination complex used for the treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma in combination with fluoropyrimidines. The objective of this review is to integrate the key data from multiple studies into a single, comprehensive overview of oxaliplatin disposition in cancer patients. The pharmacokinetics (PKs) of unbound platinum in plasma ultrafiltrate after oxaliplatin administration was triphasic, characterized by a short initial distribution phase and a long terminal elimination phase (t1/2, 252–273 h). No accumulation was observed in plasma ultrafiltrate after 130 mg/m2 every 3 weeks or 85 mg/m2 every 2 weeks. Interpatient and intrapatient variability in platinum exposure (area under the curve0–48) is moderate to low (33 and 5% respectively). In the blood, platinum binds irreversibly to plasma proteins (predominantly serum albumin) and erythrocytes. Accumulation of platinum in blood cells is not considered to be clinically significant. Platinum is rapidly cleared from plasma by covalent binding to tissues and renal elimination. Urinary excretion (53.8 ± 9.1%) was the predominant route of platinum elimination, with fecal excretion accounting for only 2.1 ± 1.9% of the administered dose 5 days postadministration. Tissue binding and renal elimination contribute equally to the clearance of ultrafilterable platinum from plasma. Renal clearance of platinum significantly correlated with glomerular filtration rate, indicating that glomerular filtration is the principal mechanism of platinum elimination by the kidneys. Clearance of ultrafilterable platinum is lower in patients with moderate renal impairment; however, no marked increase in drug toxicity was reported. The effect of severe renal impairment on platinum clearance and toxicity is currently unknown. Covariates such as age, sex, and hepatic impairment had no significant effect on the clearance of ultrafilterable platinum, and dose adjustment due to these variables is not required. Oxaliplatin undergoes rapid and extensive nonenzymatic biotransformation and is not subjected to CYP450-mediated metabolism. Up to 17 platinum-containing products have been observed in plasma ultrafiltrate samples from patients. These include several proximate cytotoxic species, including the monochloro-, dichloro-, and diaquo-diaminocyclohexane platinum complexes, along with several other noncytotoxic products. Oxaliplatin does not inhibit CYP450 isoenzymes in vitro. Platinum was not displaced from plasma proteins by a variety of concomitant medications tested in vitro, and no marked PK interactions between oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and irinothecan have been observed. These results indicate that the additive/synergistic antitumor activity observed with these agents is not due to major alterations in drug exposure, and the enhanced efficacy is likely to be mechanistically based. Together, these PK, biotransformation, drug-drug interaction analyses and studies in special patient populations provide a firm scientific basis for the safe and effective use of oxaliplatin in the clinic. These analyses also reveal that the pharmacological activity of oxaliplatin may be attributable, at least in part, to the unique pattern of platinum disposition observed in patients.

Introduction

Oxaliplatin (cis-[(1R,2R)-1,2-cyclohexanediamine-N,N′] oxalato (2-)-O,O′] platinum; Eloxatine; Fig. 1⇓ ) is a novel platinum coordination complex recently approved in Europe, Asia, and Latin America for the treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma in combination with fluoropyrimidines. Oxaliplatin is more potent than cisplatin in vitro, requiring fewer DNA adducts to achieve equivalent cytotoxicity (1, 2, 3, 4) . Oxaliplatin has demonstrated efficacy in preclinical studies against a broad spectrum of experimental tumors, including some cisplatin- and carboplatin-resistant cell lines (2 , 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11) . Clinically, the safety and efficacy of a variety of dosing regimens with 5-FU and leucovorin have been evaluated, and the combination has demonstrated marked antitumor efficacy in patients with a favorable toxicity profile (12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18) . As part of the clinical development program, the PKs2 of oxaliplatin have been evaluated by several investigators in several different laboratories. The main objectives of this review, therefore, are to: (a) provide a critical assessment of the various PK studies conducted to date; (b) integrate the key data from these investigations into a single, comprehensive overview of oxaliplatin disposition in patients; and (c) identify the PK characteristics of the drug relevant to the safe and effective use of oxaliplatin in the clinic.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Molecular structure of oxaliplatin.

Overview

An overview of the design of the various PK and metabolism studies cited in this review is summarized in Tables 1⇓ and 2⇓ . The most comprehensive PK studies were conducted in multiple matrices (plasma, ultrafiltrate, and blood) and originate from three main studies (19, 20, 21, 22, 23) . In the PK studies reported by Graham et al. (19 , 20) , the multiple dose PKs of platinum were analyzed in six patients treated with 130 mg/m2 oxaliplatin every 3 weeks for five cycles. This study provided detailed kinetic data in a variety of matrices with PK monitoring over a 3-week period and enabled platinum accumulation to be assessed after multiple dosing. In other studies reported by Allen et al. (21 , 22) , the single dose PKs, biotransformation, and excretion of platinum were explored in a total of 20 patients receiving 130 mg/m2 oxaliplatin. In these studies, the first five patients were enrolled for the assessment of oxaliplatin biotransformation and excretion (with limited PK sampling). The remaining 15 patients then underwent a full PK analysis. As an extension to this study, the multiple dose PKs of oxaliplatin were investigated in six additional patients after a 2-h infusion at 85 mg/m2 every 2 weeks for three cycles (24) . All of the above studies were supported by fully validated ICPMS bioanalytical method for platinum in ultrafiltrate, plasma, and blood (25 , 26) . The PKs of platinum (expressed as oxaliplatin equivalents) after a 4-h infusion schedule has also been reported by Kern et al. (23) in plasma and ultrafiltrate. Supportive PK studies, generally limited to measuring total plasma platinum levels, have also been conducted by a number of other investigators using a variety of FAAS and ICPMS methods (27, 28, 29, 30) .

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

%Overview of oxaliplatin PK, distribution, and P450 metabolism studies

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Overview of oxaliplatin biotransformation, excretion, special population, and drug interaction studies

The P450-mediated metabolism of oxaliplatin by human liver microsomes and the effect of oxaliplatin on CYP450 enzyme activity in vitro have been investigated in two studies (31 , 32) . Two further studies characterized the major platinum degradation products after the nonenymatic biotransformation of[ 3H]oxaliplatin in human plasma ultrafiltrate, blood, and urine samples in vitro by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (33 , 34) . These results support the in vivo biotransformation studies in patients (21) .

A comprehensive characterization of the major routes of oxaliplatin biotransformation and elimination in patients receiving a single i.v. infusion of oxaliplatin at 130 mg/m2 has been reported by Allen et al. (21 , 22) . These studies investigated the major oxaliplatin biotransformation products in plasma ultrafiltrate and urine samples from patients by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. These studies also examined platinum excretion in the urine and feces of cancer patients receiving oxaliplatin. Other supportive platinum mass balance results in urine and feces using nonvalidated bioanalytical methods have been reported by several investigators, with good agreement in the derived estimates across all studies (19 , 20 , 23 , 28 , 30) .

The PKs of platinum in special patient populations have been examined in two studies by Massari et al. (35) and Graham et al. (36) . Massari et al. (35) investigated the effect of moderate renal impairment on the clearance of platinum and toxicity of oxaliplatin in cancer patients after a single dose at 130 mg/m2. In the study by Graham et al. (36) , a meta-analysis of oxaliplatin PKs was conducted to investigate the effect of age, sex, and renal and hepatic function on the clearance of ultrafilterable platinum in cancer patients.

Finally, potential PK interactions after a single 2-h infusion of oxaliplatin at 130 mg/m2 and 5-FU (de Gramont regimen) have been examined by Papamichael et al. (37 , 38) in a one-way interaction study. Details of other in vivo and in vitro drug-drug interaction studies are also reviewed in this article.

Selection of Analyte and Matrix for PK Studies

Oxaliplatin rapidly forms a variety of reactive intermediates in blood and plasma, including the monochloro-, dichloro-, and diaquo-platinum species. These reactive platinum complexes can bind irreversibly to various constituents in the blood and/or cellular macromolecules. Ultimately, the products of these reactions are eliminated as nonreactive small molecular weight conjugates. Given the rapidity of these reactions both in vitro and in vivo, investigating the PKs of intact parent compound or one of the transient intermediates is technically difficult and not feasible for routine PK assessment. Hence monitoring platinum PKs rather than intact parent compound (or a metabolite) is a generally accepted approach that has been adopted for the analysis of other platinum complexes published in the literature (for a review, see Ref. 39 ).

For a full description of platinum PKs, it is useful to discriminate between bound and free platinum in blood and plasma. Ultrafilterable platinum (comprising nonprotein bound drug and biotransformation products in plasma water) is thought to represent all the platinum species with antitumor and toxic properties in the circulation. Unbound platinum is cleared from the systemic circulation by a combination of irreversible binding to plasma/blood constituents, tissue uptake, and urinary elimination. Platinum irreversibly bound to plasma proteins and erythrocytes is generally considered to be pharmacologically inactive (39) . Therefore, plasma ultrafiltrate represents the most relevant matrix when considering pharmacological activity.

The most comprehensive PK studies presented in this review were conducted in plasma ultrafiltrate, as well as plasma, blood, and blood cells (19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24) . In a number of earlier studies, platinum measurements were only obtained in plasma and blood samples (27, 28, 29, 30 , 40) . Therefore, plasma platinum measurements were used to make PK comparisons across all studies.

PKs of Oxaliplatin

A summary of the main PK parameters in plasma across all studies conducted to date is presented in Table 3⇓ . The studies provided consistent parameter estimates for plasma platinum Cmax and AUC (Table 3)⇓ . After a dose of 130 mg/m2 infused over 2 h, mean Cmax values were in the range of 2.59–3.22 μg/ml and mean AUC0–48 values were in the range of 50.4–71.5 μg/ml·h (Table 3)⇓ .

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3

Comparison of mean (±SD) plasma platinum PKs across studies following a single 1–4-h infusion of oxaliplatin at 130 mg/m2 (cycle 1)

Dose Proportionality

Assessment of dose proportionality for total plasma platinum was conducted as part of the Phase I study reported by Taguchi (27) . Oxaliplatin was administered as single 1-h infusion in a total of 17 patients over the dose range 20–180 mg/m2. The mean Cmax and AUC0–24 increased in a dose related manner up to 180 mg/m2. The relationship between plasma platinum AUC and dose is presented in Fig. 2⇓ .

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Relationship between oxaliplatin dose and plasma platinum AUC0–24 values (n = 2–6 patients per dose level; Ref. 27 ). Data points, mean; bars, SD.

Infusion Duration

The effect of infusion duration on plasma platinum Cmax was investigated as part of study by Marty et al. (28) . Prolongation of the infusion from 2 to 6 h has been used to circumvent the acute laryngopharyngeal dysestheias observed in certain patients.

Analysis of plasma platinum Cmax values after a 1-h infusion (dose normalized to 130 mg/m2) indicated that prolonging the infusion from 1 to 6 and 12 h decreased the mean Cmax by approximately 56 and 71%, respectively (Fig. 3)⇓ . Although 2-h infusion data were not included in this study, the levels at 1 and 6 h encompass the typical mean plasma Cmax values after a 2-h infusion (2.96 ± 0.57 μg/ml; Table 3⇓ ). The percentage of decrease in Cmax produced by increasing the duration of infusion from 2 to 6 h was estimated to be approximately 32%.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Effect of infusion duration on plasma platinum Cmax values (oxaliplatin doses normalized to 130 mg/m2; n = 3–7 patients per group; Ref. 28 ). Data points, mean; bars, SD.

Multiple Dose PKs at 130 mg/m2 and 85 mg/m2

Multiple dose PK analysis of platinum in plasma ultrafiltrate, plasma, and blood cells has been investigated after oxaliplatin infusions at 85 and 130 mg/m2 (19 , 20 , 24) .

Platinum PKs have been monitored in six patients receiving five consecutive cycles of treatment at 130 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (19 , 20) . The multiple dose PK data at 130 mg/m2 in ultrafiltrate, plasma, and blood cells are presented in Fig. 4⇓ . No accumulation was observed in plasma ultrafiltrate after 3–5 cycles of treatment. Limited platinum accumulation (≤2-fold) was observed in plasma and blood cells (Fig. 5)⇓ .

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Multiple dose PKs of platinum in plasma ultrafiltrate showing lack of accumulation after a 2-h infusion of oxaliplatin at 130 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (n = 6 patients). Line represents mean platinum concentration; ○, individual platinum concentrations;▪, trough platinum concentrations (19 , 20) .

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Platinum AUC0–48 accumulation ratios in blood cells, plasma, and ultrafiltrate, after multiple doses of oxaliplatin at 85 mg/m2 (cycle 3/cycle 1;○ ) and 130 mg/m2 (cycle 5/cycle 1; •; Refs. 19 and 20 ). Data points, mean; bars, SD.

An interim PK analysis has been conducted in three of six patients receiving three consecutive cycles at 85 mg/m2 every 2 weeks in combination with 5-FU (300 mg/m2/day continuous infusion for 12 weeks; Ref. 24 ). The multiple dose PK data at 85 mg/m2 in ultrafiltrate, plasma and blood cells are presented in Table 4⇓ . No accumulation was observed in ultrafiltrate and plasma after three cycles of treatment and platinum only accumulated to a limited extent in blood cells (<2 fold) after multiple doses at 85 mg/m2 (Fig. 5)⇓ . Similar clearance values after a dose of 85 mg/m2 have also been reported by Lokiec et al. (41) after PK studies with oxaliplatin in combination with CPT-11.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4

Comparison of mean (±SD) ultrafilterable platinum PKs across studies following dosing of oxaliplatin at 85 and 130 mg/m2 following a 2- or 4-h infusion

Mean Cmax values were calculated on cycle 5 for Refs 19 and 20 , cycle 1 for Ref. 22, and cycle 3 for Ref. 24 . Mean AUC0–inf, Vss, and Cl terms were calculated on Cycle 1. t1/2 was calculated as mean value over all cycles using compartmental analysis.

Peak Platinum Exposure (Cmax)

After a 2-h infusion of oxaliplatin at 130 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, mean (±SD) Cmax values in plasma ultrafiltrate on cycle 5 were approximately 1.21 ± 0.10 μg/ml. Mean Cmax values in plasma and blood cells were approximately 3.61 ± 0.43 and 3.25 ± 0.49, μg/ml respectively (cycle 5; Refs. 19 and 20 ). Mean Cmax values in plasma ultrafiltrate, plasma, and blood cells after a 2-h infusion of oxaliplatin at 85 mg/m2 every 2 weeks for three cycles were 0.681 ± 0.077, 1.92 ± 0.338, and 2.67 ± 0.798μ g/ml, respectively, on cycle 3 (24) .

Platinum Exposure (AUC)

After a 2-h infusion of oxaliplatin at 130 mg/m2, AUC0-inf values in plasma ultrafiltrate (cycle 1) were 11.9 ± 4.60 μg·h/ml. AUC0-inf values in plasma and blood cells (cycle 1) were typically 207 ± 60.9 and 1326 ± 570 μg·h/ml, respectively (19 , 20 , 22) .

Mean (±SD) AUC0-inf values (cycle 1) in plasma ultrafiltrate, plasma, and blood cells after a 2-h infusion of oxaliplatin at 85 mg/m2 were 4.25 ± 1.18, 118 ± 8.97, and 252 ± 34.6 μg/ml·h, respectively (24) .

Platinum Half-life (t1/2)

In the studies monitoring PK of platinum over 2–3 weeks posttreatment, the PKs of platinum in ultrafiltrate were triexponential, characterized by short initial α and β distribution phases (0.28 and 16.3 h, respectively) followed by a long terminalγ -phase (273 h; Refs. 19 and 20 ).

The short initial half-life of platinum in plasma ultrafiltrate probably represents the rapid clearance of intact oxaliplatin and the reactive dichloro-, monochloro-, and diaquo-DACH platin intermediates into tissues and/or removal from the systematic circulation via glomerular filtration. The long terminal half-life of unbound platinum in plasma ultrafiltrate probably represents the slow release of low molecular weight platinum-amino acid conjugates after the degradation of cellular macromolecules, such as proteins (19 , 20) .

The apparent differences in the terminal half-life estimates between studies for total plasma platinum and ultrafiltrate (Tables 3⇓ and 4)⇓ is likely to be due to two main contributory factors: first, differences in the frequency and duration of sample collection (Table 1)⇓ ; and second, differences in detection limits between FAAS and ICPMS (approximately 50 and 1 ng/ml, respectively). For example, the terminal half-life of platinum estimated by Kern et al. (23) was approximately 27.3 ± 10.6 h in plasma ultrafiltrate. However, blood sampling was only conducted over a 24-h period, which results in an imprecise estimate of the terminal elimination phase. In contrast, in studies in which complete PK monitoring was conducted 2–3 weeks posttreatment and using a more sensitive ICPMS method, the terminal half-life of platinum in ultrafiltrate was estimated to be 273 ± 19.0 h (19 , 20) .

The latter half-life estimate of 273 h represents a more rigorous and precise evaluation of the terminal half-life of platinum after oxaliplatin administration. However, the half-lives of the shorter α and β phases (0.28 and 16.3 h, respectively) probably represent the more clinically relevant t1/2 values of pharmacologically active platinum, given that the platinum in the terminal elimination phase will comprise almost entirely of inactive platinum conjugates (21 , 42) .

Platinum Clearance

The clearance of ultrafilterable platinum was relatively high, with estimates ranging from 9.34 ± 2.85 to 10.1 ± 3.07 liters/h at 130 mg/m2 (20 , 22) to 18.5 ± 4.71 liters/h at 85 mg/m2 (24 ; Table 4⇓ ). Platinum clearance was similar to or exceeded the average human glomerular filtration of approximately 7.5 liters/h. The renal clearance of ultrafilterable platinum has been shown to be significantly correlated with GFR, indicating that glomerular filtration is a principal mechanism of platinum clearance after oxaliplatin administration (36) .

Clearance of platinum from plasma and blood cells was relatively low, which is probably a reflection of the covalent binding of platinum to these matrices (19 , 20) .

Platinum Volume of Distribution (Vss)

Platinum has a high volume of distribution from plasma ultrafiltrate ranging from 349 ± 132 to 812 ± 369 liters (Refs. 19 and 20 ; Table 4⇓ ). This high volume of distribution may be due to the lipophillic nature DACH platinum complexes and the subsequent irreversible binding of platinum to proteins, DNA, and other cellular macromolecules.

Platinum Accumulation (Rac)

No significant accumulation has been observed in plasma ultrafiltrate after multiple dosing at 130 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (19 , 20 , 29) or 85 mg/m2 every 2 weeks (24) . The AUC0–48 accumulation ratios in ultrafiltrate, plasma and blood cells at 130 mg/m2 every 3 weeks are shown in Fig. 5⇓ . Although platinum has a long terminal half-life in ultrafiltrate (273 h), the lack of accumulation in this matrix is probably due to the fact that the terminal portion of the curve contributes little to the overall AUC and there is negligible carryover into the next cycle.

Negligible accumulation of platinum was observed in plasma at 130 mg/m2 [cycle 5/cycle 1 AUC0–48 accumulation ratio = 1.33 (95% CI = 1.24–1.42); Refs. 19 , 20, and 29] . Similar results were also obtained after multiple dosing at 85 mg/m2 every 2 weeks [cycle 3/cycle 1 AUC0–48 accumulation ratio = 1.04 (95% CI = 0.72–1.51); Ref. 24] .

Statistically significant accumulation in blood cells [cycle 5/cycle 1 AUC0–48 accumulation ratio = 2.05 (95% CI = 1.81–2.32)] was observed after oxaliplatin administration at 130 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (19 , 20 , 29) . Some accumulation was also observed in blood cells with the 85 mg/m2 every 2-week dosing regimen [cycle 3/cycle 1 AUC0–48 accumulation ratio = 1.94 (95% CI = 1.39–2.71); Ref. 24] .

Blood cell accumulation has been reported for other platinum complexes, but to a lesser degree (43) .However, the pharmacological significance of blood cell accumulation is limited given the irreversible binding of platinum to this matrix and the lack of platinum efflux in in vitro experiments (7 , 19 , 20 , 29) .

Platinum Accumulation and Steady State (Css)

Attainment of steady state was determined by measuring trough concentrations in plasma ultrafiltrate after five consecutive 3-week cycles of oxaliplatin at 130 mg/m2. No accumulation of platinum was observed in ultrafiltrate, and steady state was achieved on cycle 1 (19 , 20) .

No formal analysis of steady state levels after multiple dosing at 85 mg/m2 has been made, as only three cycles of treatment were evaluated (24) . However, no accumulation was observed in plasma ultrafiltrate, an observation consistent with steady state being reached on cycle 1.

Variability in Ultrafilterable Platinum PKs

Moderate to low between-patient and within-patient variability was observed in ultrafilterable platinum levels over five cycles of treatment. The between- and within-patient variability in ultrafiltrate concentration at the end of infusion (Cend) was 18 and 13%, respectively, and 33 and 5% for the between- and within-patient variability in AUC0–48. (19 , 20) .

Platinum Distribution In Vitro and In Vivo

Binding of Platinum to Plasma Proteins.

The extent of platinum binding to human plasma proteins has been investigated in vitro over the concentration range 0.3–20μ g/ml oxaliplatin after incubation at 37°C for 6 h (serum) or 24 h (purified protein solutions; Ref. 44 ). The binding kinetics were determined by ultrafiltration and platinum levels were assayed by FAAS.

The binding of platinum to serum was moderate (79–87%) and time dependent. Equilibrium was attained after 6 h for serum and after 24 h for albumin. Most of platinum was found to be covalently bound. There was no evidence of saturable binding over the concentration range 0.3–20 μg/ml (44) .

The main serum binding proteins were found to be albumin and gamma-globulins (44) . Similar in vitro binding studies were performed by Pendyala and Creaven (7) , except that plasma, rather than serum protein, was used. The binding of oxaliplatin derived platinum to plasma protein was found to be moderate, with 85–88% of the total platinum bound within 5 h.

The plasma protein binding of platinum has also been investigated in patients receiving 130 mg/m2 oxaliplatin by 2-h infusion every 3 weeks for five cycles (n = 6 patients; Refs. 19 and 20 ). At the end of infusion at 2 h on cycle 5, the mean percentage of platinum bound to plasma protein was 65.5 ± 4.89%, which progressively increased to 90.3 ± 1.75% at 6 h and to 98.0 ± 0.42% by 3 weeks.

Similar in vivo protein binding results have also been reported by Misset and Allain (30) . On day 1 at 2 h posttreatment, plasma protein binding was estimated at 70%. Five days posttreatment, with oxaliplatin at 130 mg/m2, plasma protein binding was estimated to be >95%.

Binding of Platinum to Erythrocytes.

Platinum has been shown to irreversibly bind to and accumulate in erythrocytes (7) . The half-life of erythrocytic bound platinum is therefore likely to be determined by the rate of erythrocyte turnover (19 , 20) . Blood cell associated platinum is not considered to be a reservoir of pharmacologically active platinum due to the irreversible nature of the binding and the lack of platinum efflux in in vitro experiments (7 , 19 , 20) .

Although platinum binds to blood cells, the blood cells only represent a minor compartment for drug distribution in patients (19 , 20) . At the end of infusion (2 h), approximately 15% of the administered platinum is present in the blood. The remaining 85% has undergone distribution from the plasma into tissues or has been subjected to urinary elimination. Therefore, platinum distribution to blood cells represents a relatively small component when consideration is given to the total body disposition of platinum.

Binding of Platinum to Lymphocytes.

The uptake of platinum into peripheral lymphocytes of patients has been investigated after multiple doses of oxaliplatin at 130 mg/m2 (45) . Platinum was found in DNA extracts from all oxaliplatin treated patients 1 h after the end of infusion on cycles 1 and 3. The removal of platinum adducts was rapid. In four of six patients, no platinum was detected 24 h posttreatment on cycle 1, and platinum levels could only be detected in one of six patients on day 5.

Biotransformation and Metabolic Fate of Oxaliplatin

Metabolism and Biotransformation Overview.

Oxaliplatin undergoes a series of spontaneous, nonenzymatic conversions in biological fluids, a process referred to as drug biotransformation. These reactions are mediated primarily through the displacement of the oxalate group by H2O and endogenous nucleophiles, such as Cl− and HCO3− ions. Several transient reactive species are formed, including dichloro-, monochloro-, and diaquo-DACH platin, which can complex with amino acids, proteins, DNA, and other macromolecules in plasma and tissues (Fig. 6⇓ ; Refs. 21 and 22 ).

Fig. 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Biotransformation of oxaliplatin and pharmacological activity of the major products (IC50 values in HT-29 human colon carcinoma cells in vitro; Refs. 21 , 22, and 42 ).

Studies to investigate the metabolism of oxaliplatin by human liver microsome extracts indicated that oxaliplatin was not a substrate for CYP450 in vitro (32) .

Drug Metabolism Studies.

The biotransformation of [3H]oxaliplatin was investigated using human liver microsomal fractions in vitro (31) . Human liver microsomes were prepared from three human livers with high CYP450 activity.

After a 30-min incubation of [3H]oxaliplatin with human hepatic microsomes in the presence of NADPH, most of the radioactivity (67%) was associated with unchanged drug. Another major component, which comprised 17% of the total radioactivity, co-eluted with the diaquo-DACH platin standard. Several other minor products were also detected, each representing less than 1–3% of the radioactivity. Similar results were obtained in the absence of NADPH (71% co-eluting as unchanged drug and 17% as diaquo-DACH platin) and using heat-denatured microsomes, indicating that the biotransformation of oxaliplatin was nonenzymatic and occurred by chemical degradation.

In summary, no oxidative metabolism of the DACH group was detected in vitro. [3H]Oxaliplatin was stable to oxidative CYP450-mediated metabolism and degraded nonenzymatically to a single major product, tentatively identified as diaquo-DACH platin (31 , 32) .

Biotransformation Studies in Vitro.

The in vitro biotransformation and distribution of[ 3H]oxaliplatin has been investigated in plasma ultrafiltrate, urine, and whole blood samples (33 , 34) .

[3H]Oxaliplatin underwent extensive biotransformation in plasma ultrafiltrate and urine. At least 17 radioactive products were observed by HPLC in plasma ultrafiltrate at 24 h, the major ones of which chromatographed with DACH platinum adducts of methionine (6%), monochloro (37%), monochlorocreatinine (9%), dichloro (10%), and monocreatinine (4%). A major unidentified product (SP21; 10%) was also evident. A similar profile was observed at 24 h, and five additional products were also detected, one of which was tentatively identified by mass spectrometry as monochloro urea DACH platin (11%; Refs. 33 and 34 ).

At least 16 radioactive products were present in vitro in urine after incubation with oxaliplatin, the major ones of which were characterized by mass spectrometry and included dicreatinine (24%), methionine (6%), monochloro (2%), monochlorocreatinine (14%), dichloro (7%), and monocreatinine (11%) DACH platins. Diaquo-DACH platin (6%) was tentatively identified by HPLC (34) .

In summary, the in vitro biotransformation studies in plasma ultrafiltrate, urine, and whole blood corresponded closely to the profile of oxaliplatin biotransformation products characterized in the ultrafiltrate and urine samples of patients undergoing oxaliplatin therapy (21 , 22) .

Biotransformation Studies in Vivo.

Allen et al. (21 , 22) have demonstrated that oxaliplatin undergoes extensive biotransformation in cancer patients, with evidence of nucleophilic substitution of the oxalate-leaving group and dissociation of the platinum complex from the carrier ligand, DACH. The major routes of biotransformation to active species is depicted in Fig. 6⇓ . Oxaliplatin was below the limit of detection in plasma ultrafiltrate at the end of infusion (2 h) at 130 mg/m2 and could not be detected in urine. Up to 17 platinum-containing products were observed in the plasma ultrafiltrate, the major one of which, in four of five patients, corresponded by HPLC to monochloro-DACH platin (31–100% sample platinum). Other putative DACH platinum complexes of dichloro (2–8%), diaquo (2–26%), methionine (8–24%), monochlorocreatinine (2–11%), and glutathione (12%) appeared to be present in plasma ultrafiltrate. A number of unknown products were also observed (21 , 22) .

Up to 21 products were resolved by HPLC in urine, a number of which were characterized by mass spectrometry. These included dicreatinine (1–4% platinum dose), methionine (1–7%), monochloro (2%), monochlorocreatinine (1–20%), and monocreatinine (1–10%) DACH platins. In addition, glutathione DACH platin (2–18% dose) and a number of unidentified products were also resolved by HPLC (21 , 22) .

Preclinical cytotoxicity studies indicate that the monochloro-, dichloro-, and diaquo-DACH platin represent the principal cytotoxic platinum species in the systemic circulation, whereas the conjugated platinum complexes were devoid of cytotoxic activity (42) .

Platinum Elimination

Urinary and Fecal Elimination of Platinum.

The elimination of platinum occurs mainly in urine rather than in feces (Table 5)⇓ .

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 5

Urinary and fecal elimination of platinum following a single 2-h infusion at 130 mg/m2

A mass balance study was performed to determine the major route of platinum elimination in patients after a single dose of oxaliplatin at 130 mg/m2 (21 , 22) . Urine and fecal samples were collected over 5 days from five patients. Over the 5-day study period, the majority of the platinum dose (53.8%) was excreted in the urine, with only 2.1% in feces (Table 5)⇓ Between 2 and 12% of the administered dose was excreted in urine as free DACH carrier ligand.

Similar mass balance results have also been reported by other investigators (19 , 28 , 30) and are summarized in Table 5⇓ .

PKs in Special Patient Populations

Platinum Clearance and Renal Function.

The clearance of platinum in patients with normal renal function and moderate renal impairment has been investigated by Massari et al. (35) . Twenty-four patients were evaluated (10 with moderate renal impairment and 14 with normal renal function) after a single dose of oxaliplatin at a dose of 130 mg/m2 given as a 2-h infusion. The median creatinine clearance in the normal group was 78.00 (± 19.63) ml/min. One patient in this group had a calculated creatinine clearance <60 ml/min but was still included in the normal group due to the absence of any history of renal failure. The median creatinine clearance in the renally impaired group was 42.20 (± 10.63) ml/min.

There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with respect to ultrafilterable platinum Cmax. There was, however, a significant increase in AUC in patients with moderate renal impairment and a significant decrease in clearance of ultrafiltrate platinum (35) . Clearance in the group with moderate renal impairment was 14.23 ± 6.04 liters/h. This was significantly lower (P = 0.005) than clearance in the group with normal renal function (25.70 ± 8.53 liters/h). Although there was a significant decrease in the clearance of ultrafilterable platinum, no additional toxicity was observed in the renally impaired patients (35) .

Platinum Clearance.

Typically the clearance of ultrafilterable platinum has been shown to range from 9.34 ± 2.85 to 13.3 liters/h at 130 mg/m2 (Table 4)⇓ . The apparently higher clearance at 85 mg/m2 (18.5 ± 4.71) and in the study by Massari et al. (35) quoted above is likely to be due to underestimation of the AUC.

Renal clearance at 130 mg/m2 (4.66 liters/h) contributed to approximately half of the total clearance of platinum and was close to the average human GFR of approximately 7.5 liters/h. The clearance of ultrafilterable plasma platinum and platinum renal clearance was also significantly correlated with GFR (36) . These results indicate that glomerular filtration is a major mechanism of platinum elimination from the body after oxaliplatin administration.

Clearance of platinum from plasma and blood cells was relatively low (19 , 20) , which is probably a reflection of the covalent binding of platinum to these matrices.

Platinum Clearance and the Effect of Hepatic Function, Sex, and Age.

A meta-analysis in 26 patients pooled from two studies (n = 26 subjects) was performed by Graham et al. (36) to investigate the relationship between hepatic function (baseline ALT) and ultrafilterable platinum clearance. There was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.507) in platinum clearance in patients with normal ALT values (2–47 units/liter) or in patients with mild to moderate elevations in ALT values (48–126 units/liter; Ref. 36 ).

In the same meta-analysis, no statistically significant differences (P = 0.0657) were observed between males and females with respect to the clearance of ultrafilterable platinum (36) . Similarly, no statistically significant correlation (P = 0.618) was observed between the clearance of ultrafilterable platinum and age (26–72 years; Ref. 36 ).

Drug-Drug Interactions

Effect of Oxaliplatin on 5-FU Clearance.

The effect of oxaliplatin on the PKs of 5-FU has been studied in 18 patients with colorectal carcinoma (37 , 38) . 5-FU was administered to these patients according to the de Gramont regimen (200 mg/m2 leucovorin, 400 mg/m2 5-FU as an i.v. bolus injection on day 1 followed by 600 mg/m2 5-FU by 22 h of continuous infusion).

The study adopted a parallel group design (n = 9 patients per group) with or without a single infusion of oxaliplatin at 85 mg/m2. The PKs of 5-FU were compared in the presence and absence of oxaliplatin after 1–7 cycles of treatment with the combination.

Although an early interim analysis of the data in limited number of patients reported a significant PK interaction between oxaliplatin and 5-FU (37) , the final analysis of the full data set in 18 patients indicated no significant differences in 5-FU exposure in the presence and absence of oxaliplatin (38 ; Fig. 7⇓ ; Table 6⇓ ).

Fig. 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 7.

5-FU AUC values in plasma after the administration of 5-FU alone (de Gramont regimen) or in combination with oxaliplatin at 85 mg/m2 (n = 9 patients per group; not significant: P = 0.299; Ref. 38 ). •, mean; bars, SD.

Figure8
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure9
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure10
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure11
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 6

PKs of 5-FU alone or following a single 2-h infusion of oxaliplatin at 85 mg/m2 (de Gramont regimen; Ref 38 )

PK analyses of oxaliplatin (85–130 mg/m2) in combination with CPT-11 (150–350 mg/m2) have also demonstrated no statistically significant PK interactions between the drugs with respect to clearance (41) .

Effect of 5-FU on Platinum Clearance.

The effect of 5-FU on oxaliplatin PKs has not been studied directly; however, comparison of platinum levels when oxaliplatin is combined with 5-FU (weekly infusion regimen) show that oxaliplatin exposure in the presence of 5-FU is within the normal range of the values derived from single agent studies in the absence of 5-FU (30) .

Drug-Drug Interaction Assessments In Vitro

CYP450 Interactions.

Oxaliplatin did not significantly inhibit (defined as a decrease in enzyme activity to <70% of control rate) CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP3A4, CYP2D6, or CYP2E1. Therefore, metabolically mediated drug-drug interactions of oxaliplatin on co-administered drugs cleared by these CYP450 isoforms are not anticipated in the clinic (32) . Additionally, because the biotransformation of oxaliplatin is not dependent on CYP450, induction or inhibition of CYP450 activity by medications concomitantly administered with oxaliplatin is not expected to affect platinum clearance.

Plasma Protein Binding Interactions.

Drug-drug interaction studies have been performed in vitro, to investigate the ability of selected concomitant medications, including erythromycin, salicylate, sodium valproate, granisetron, and paclitaxel (Taxol), to displace oxaliplatin from plasma proteins (44) . Oxaliplatin (20 μg/ml) was incubated at for 6 h with human serum protein in the presence of erythromycin (7 μg/ml), salicylate (300 μg/ml), sodium valproate (100 μg/ml), granisetron (100 ng/ml), and paclitaxel (5 μg/ml). Any displaced platinum was then assayed in plasma ultrafiltrate by FAAS.

No significant displacement of platinum from plasma protein was observed with any of the concomitant medications tested, with the exception of a small (2.85%) increase in free platinum concentrations in the presence of erythromycin (44) . This small increase is not considered to be clinically significant, and no protein binding displacement reactions are anticipated in patients.

Comparative PKs of Oxaliplatin, Cisplatin, Carboplatin, and Tetraplatin

The comparative PKs of oxaliplatin, tetraplatin, cisplatin, and carboplatin are presented in Table 7⇓ . The PKs of platinum complexes are determined by two major factors. First, the stability of the leaving ligand largely determines the chemical reactivity and intrinsic cytotoxicity of the complex. Second, the nature of the carrier ligand may influence the tissue distribution characteristics of the molecule. These two factors combined will determine the unique chemical reactivity and disposition properties of a given platinum complex. Among the most striking differences between the DACH platin complexes compared to cisplatin and carboplatin are the differences in the volume of distribution from plasma ultrafiltrate. Oxaliplatin and tetraplatin have very large volumes of distribution (582 and 378 liters) compared to 19.2 and 17.0 liters for cisplatin and carboplatin, respectively (Table 7)⇓ . This observation implies that the DACH moiety may confer some advantages in terms of enhanced tissue penetration that may be due altered cell membrane permeability. This hypothesis is supported by the observation that oxaliplatin accumulates more readily into erythrocytes compared to cisplatin and carboplatin, a feature that cannot be explained solely on the basis of chemical reactivity and covalent binding of platinum. To date, however, no direct measurements of platinum concentrations in normal or tumor tissue have been made after oxaliplatin administration to substantiate this hypothesis.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 7

Comparative PKs of oxaliplatin, tetraplatin, cisplatin and carboplatin

The urinary elimination of platinum within 24 h of treatment differs markedly across the various platinum compounds. For example, the more chemically reactive platinum complexes, such as cisplatin and tetraplatin, exhibit relatively low platinum recovery in urine (approximately 11–32%) within 24 h of treatment. This observation probably reflects the extensive binding of these reactive platinum compounds to tissues and implies that renal elimination is relatively unimportant, at least during the initial phases of platinum clearance from plasma. In contrast, carboplatin is considerably less chemically reactive than cisplatin and tetraplatin by virtue of the carboxylato-leaving ligand. Carboplatin is extensively cleared unchanged, with platinum urinary recovery values up to 77%. In contrast to cisplatin and tetraplatin, clearance is predominantly driven by GFR, and carboplatin doses are now routinely adjusted based on a prospective evaluation of GFR. Oxaliplatin appears to be cleared equally by tissue distribution and glomerular filtration. The clearance of ultrafilterable platinum from plasma after a dose of oxaliplatin administration at 130 mg/m2 is in the range of 9.34–10.1 liters/h. Renal clearance (approximately 4.66 liters/h) accounts for approximately half of the total plasma clearance, implying that distribution into tissues is also an important clearance mechanism for oxaliplatin. Given that tissue distribution and GFR appear to play equal roles in the clearance of oxaliplatin, it is predicted that a prospective evaluation renal function alone (GFR) is unlikely to be a useful predictor of platinum exposure and toxicity after oxaliplatin administration.

Conclusions

The PKs of unbound platinum in plasma ultrafiltrate after oxaliplatin administration are typically triphasic, characterized by a short initial distribution phase and a long terminal elimination phase (t1/2, 252–273 h). No accumulation was observed in plasma ultrafiltrate after 130 mg/m2 every 3 weeks or 85 mg/m2 every 2 weeks. Interpatient and intrapatient variability in platinum exposure (AUC0–48) was moderate to low (33 and 5%, respectively). Platinum bound irreversibly to plasma proteins (predominantly serum albumin) and erythrocytes. Erythrocytes did not serve as a reservoir for platinum in the systemic circulation, and accumulation of platinum in blood cells is not considered to be of clinical significance. Platinum was rapidly cleared from plasma ultrafiltrate (9.34–18.5 liters/h) at a rate that was similar to or exceeded the average human GFR (7.5 liters/h). The renal clearance of platinum significantly correlated with GFR, indicating that renal filtration is a major mechanism of platinum clearance. Tissue distribution is also an equally major mechanism of platinum elimination from systemic circulation.

Clearance of ultrafilterable platinum was decreased in patients with moderate renal impairment; however, there was no increase in drug toxicity. The effect of severe renal impairment on platinum clearance and toxicity is unknown. There was no significant effect of age, sex, or moderate hepatic impairment on the clearance of ultrafilterable platinum. Oxaliplatin underwent rapid and extensive nonenzymatic biotransformation in plasma ultrafiltrate and urine in vitro and in vivo. There was no evidence of CYP450-mediated metabolism in vitro. Up to 17 platinum-containing products were observed in plasma ultrafiltrate samples, including several putative cytotoxic species (including monochloro-, dichloro-, and diaquo-DACH platin). A number of noncytotoxic products (methionine, monochlorocreatine, and glutathione DACH platins), together with some unknown products, were also observed. Urinary elimination (53.8 ± 9.1%) was the predominant route of platinum elimination, with fecal excretion accounting for only 2.1 ± 1.9% of the administered dose 5 days postadministration. No significant PK interaction between oxaliplatin, 5-FU, and CPT-11 have been observed in patients. Oxaliplatin did not inhibit CYP450 isoenzymes in vitro, and platinum was not displaced from plasma proteins by selected concomitant medications. No metabolism-based drug-drug interactions or plasma protein binding displacement interactions are therefore anticipated in patients.

Analysis of platinum PKs after oxaliplatin, tetraplatin, cisplatin, and carboplatin administration reveals marked differences in the platinum disposition characteristics between the drugs. This may be attributable to differences in the stability of the various leaving ligands, which in turn determine the chemical reactivity of the complex. In addition, the nature of the various carrier ligands also appears to profoundly alter the disposition characteristics of platinum, with the DACH platinum species exhibiting substantially higher volumes of distribution compared to cisplatin and carboplatin.

In conclusion, these PK, biotransformation, mass balance, and drug-drug interaction studies provide a firm scientific basis for the safe and effective use of oxaliplatin in the clinic. These analyses also reveal that the pharmacological activity of oxaliplatin may be attributable, at least in part, to the unique pattern of platinum disposition in observed patients.

Acknowledgments

We thank the following for their invaluable contributions and critical review of this work: J. Allen, J. Firth, J. G. Morrison, S. Woolfrey, S. McDougall, G, Shackleton, R. Crane, Jr., J. Newton, W. Brian, J. Brandl, S. Bernard, J-F. Thiercelin, J. Oppermann, R-H. Charollais, P. Rigaudy, T. Pearce, M. Boisdron-Celle, S. Joel, J. L. Missett, D. Papamichael, P. Allain, D. Cunningham, and S. Chaney.

Footnotes

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • ↵1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Drug Metabolism, Sanofi-Synthelabo, 9 Great Valley Parkway, Malvern, PA 19355. Phone: 610-889-6025; Fax: 610-889-6356.

  • ↵2 The abbreviations used are: PK, pharmacokinetic; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; CYP 450, cytochrome P450; DACH, diaminocyclohexane; FAAS, flameless atomic absorption spectroscopy; 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; HPLC, high-pressure liquid chromatography; ICPMS, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry; ALT, alanine transaminase; CPT-11, irinothecan.

  • Received July 8, 1999.
  • Revision received December 14, 1999.
  • Accepted December 20, 1999.

References

  1. ↵
    Mamenta E. L., Poma E. E., Kaufmann W. K., Delmastro D. A., Grady H. L., Chaney S. G. Enhanced replicative bypass of platinum-DNA adducts in cisplatin-resistant human ovarian carcinoma cell lines. Cancer Res., 54: 3500-3505, 1994.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Rixe O., Ortuzar W., Alvarez A., Parker R., Reed E., Paull K., Fojo T. Oxaliplatin, tetraplatin, cisplatin, and carboplatin: spectrum of activity in drug-resistant cell lines and in the cell lines of the National Cancer Institute’s Anticancer Drug Screen Panel. Biochem. Pharmacol., 52: 1855-1865, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Schmidt W., Chaney S. G. Role of carrier ligand in platinum resistance of human carcinoma cell lines. Cancer Res., 53: 799-805, 1993.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Rietbroek R. C., van de Vaart P. J. M., Haveman J., Blommaert F. A., Geerdink A., Bakker P. J. M., Veenhof C. H. N. Hyperthermia enhances the cytotoxicity and platinum-DNA adduct formation of lobaplatin and oxaliplatin in cultured SW 1573 cells. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol., 123: 6-12, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Kidani Y., Inagaki K., Saito R. Synthesis and anti-tumor activities of platinum (II) complexes of 1,2-diaminocyclohexane isomers and their related derivatives. J. Clin. Hematol. Oncol., 7: 197-209, 1977.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    Kraker A. J., Moore C. W. Accumulation of cis-diammine-dichloroplatinum (II) and platinum analogues by platinum-resistant murine leukemia cell in vitro. Cancer Res., 48: 9-13, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Pendyala L., Creaven P. J. In vitro cytotoxicity, protein binding, red blood cell partitioning, and biotransformation of oxaliplatin. Cancer Res., 53: 5970-5976, 1993.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Silvestro L., Anal H., Sommer F., Trincal G., Tapiero H. Comparative effects of a new platinum analog (trans-1-diamine-cyclohexane oxalato-platinum; l-OHP) with CDDP on various cells: correlation with intracellular accumulation. Anticancer Res., 10: 1376 1990.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    Fukuda M., Ohe Y., Kanzawa F., Oka M., Hara K., Saijo N. Evaluation of novel platinum complexes, inhibitors of topoisomerase I and II in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) sub-lines resistant to cisplatin. Anticancer Res., 15: 393-398, 1995.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    Riccardi A., Meco D., Lasorella A., Mastrangelo R., Rumi C., Riccardi R. Comparison of cytotoxicity of oxaliplatin, cisplatin, and carboplatin in human neuroblastoma (NB) cell lines. Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Annu. Meet., 16: 249 1997.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    Dunn T. A., Schmoll H. J., Grünwald V., Bokemeyer C., Casper J. Comparative cytotoxicity of oxaliplatin and cisplatin in non-seminomatous germ cell cancer cell lines. Invest. New Drugs, 15: 109-114, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Bleiberg H., de Gramont A. Oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil: clinical experience in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Semin. Oncol., 25: 32-39, 1998.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    de Gramont A., Figer A., Seymour M., Homerin M., Le Bail N., Cassidy J., Boni C., Cortes-Funes H., Freyer G., Hendler D., Louvet C. A randomized trial of leucovorin (LV) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with or without oxaliplatin in advanced colorectal cancer. Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Annu. Meet., 17: 257 1998.
  14. ↵
    Levi F., Misset J-L., Brienza S., Adam R., Metzger G., Itzakhi M., Caussanel J., Kunstlinger F., Lecouturier S., Descorps-Declère A., Jasmin C., Bismuth H., Reinberg A. A chronopharmacologic Phase II clinical trial with 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid, and oxaliplatin using ambulatory multichannel programmable pump: high antitumor effectiveness against metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer (Phila.), 69: 893-900, 1992.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Levi F., Dogliotti L., Perpoint P., Zidani R., Giacchetti S., Chollet P., Le Rol A., Llory J. F., Focan C., Kunstinger F., Adam R., Vannetzel J. M., Letourneau Y., Jasmin C., Bismuth H., Misset J. L. A multicenter Phase II trial of intensified chronotherapy with oxaliplatin (l-OHP), 5-fluorouracil (5FU), and folinic acid (FA) in patients (pts) with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC). Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Annu. Meet., 16: 266 1997.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    Levi F. A., Zidani R., Vannetzel J-M., Perpoint B., Focan C., Faggiuolo R., Chollet P., Garufi C., Itzhaki M., Dogliotti L., Iacobelli S., Adam R., Kunstlinger F., Gastiaburu J., Bismuth H., Jasmin C., Misset J. L. Chronomodulated versus fixed-infusion-rate delivery of ambulatory chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and folinic acid (leucovorin) in patients with colorectal cancer metastases: a randomized multi-institutional trial. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 86: 1608-1617, 1994.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Levi F., Zidani R., Misset J-L. Randomized multicentre trial of chronotherapy with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and folinic acid in metastatic colorectal cancer. Lancet, 350: 681-686, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Giacchetti S., Zidani R., Perpoint P., Pinel M. C., Faggiuolo R., Focan C., Letoumeau Y., Chollet P., Llory J. F., Coudet B., Bertheault-Cvitkovic F., Adam R., Le Bail N., Misset J. L., Bayssas M., Levi F. Phase III trial of 5-flurouracil (5-FU), folinic acid (FA), with or without oxaliplatin (OXA) in previously untreated patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC). Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Annu. Meet., 16: 229 1997.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    Graham, M. A., Brienza, S., Misset, J-L., Cupissol, E., Gamelin, E., and Allain, P. Pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin given in repeated doses of 130 mg/m2 by 2 h infusion every three weeks to cancer patients. Sanofi Research Report No. VAR3149, 1998.
  20. ↵
    Graham, M. A., Gamelin, E., Misset, J-L., Brienza, S., Allain, P., Boisdron-Celle, Krikorian, A., Greenslade, D., and Bayssas, M. Clinical pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin. Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res., 39: 159, 1998.
  21. ↵
    Allen J., Graham M. A., Firth J., Woolfrey S., Greenslade D., Morrison J. G., McDougall S., Ross P., Cunningham D. Biotransformation and pharmacokinetic analysis of oxaliplatin in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer. Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res., 39: 159 1998.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    Allen, J., Graham, M. A., Watson, D., Chung, D., Tabah-Fisch, I., Ross, P., and Cunningham, D. A clinical metabolism and pharmacokinetic study of oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer. Sanofi Research Report No. PKM2983 (part 1), 1998.
  23. ↵
    Kern W., Braess J., Bottger B., Kaufmann C. C., Hiddemann W., Schleyer E. Oxaliplatin pharmacokinetics during a four-hour infusion. Clin. Cancer Res., 5: 761-765, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Graham, M. A. A clinical metabolism and pharmacokinetic study of oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer. Sanofi Research Report No. PKM2983 (part 2), 1998.
  25. ↵
    Woolfrey, S., Le Bouil, A., and Allain, P. Validation of platinum determination in biological fluids by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Sanofi Research Report No. DOH0127, 1998.
  26. ↵
    Morrison, J. D. Validation of an inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICPMS) assay for the determination of platinum in human blood, plasma, and ultrafiltrate. Sanofi Research Report No. DOH0088, 1998.
  27. ↵
    Taguchi, T. The final report of the Phase I clinical study of ACT-078 (oxaliplatin). Debiopharm/Sanofi Research Report No. TDU3131, 1998.
  28. ↵
    Marty, M. l-OHP Phase I study. Debiopharm/Sanofi Report No. TDU3099, 1989.
  29. ↵
    Gamelin E., Le Bouil A., Boisdron-Celle M., Turcant A., Delva R., Cailleux A., Krikorian A., Brienza S., Cvitkovic E., Robert J., Larra F., Allain P. Cumulative pharmacokinetic study of oxaliplatin administered every three weeks combined with 5-fluorouracil in colorectal cancer patients. Clin. Cancer Res., 3: 891-899, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  30. ↵
    Misset, J. L., and Allain, P. Pharmacokinetics, urinary, and fecal excretion of oxaliplatin in cancer patients. Debiopharm/Sanofi Report No. TDR3500, 1995.
  31. ↵
    Shackleton, G. L., and Allen, J. The in vitro metabolism of [3H]-oxaliplatin in human microsomes. Sanofi Research Report No. MIV0249, 1997.
  32. ↵
    Brandl, J., and Brian, W. Investigating the potential for SR96669 to inhibit cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes using human liver microsomes in vitro. Sanofi Research Report No. MIH0034, 1998.
  33. ↵
    Shackleton, G. L., and Allen, J. The in vitro metabolism of [3H]-oxaliplatin in human microsomes. Sanofi Research Report No. MIV0250, 1997.
  34. ↵
    McDougall, S., and Allen, J. In vitro stability of [3H]-oxaliplatin in human plasma ultrafiltrate and urine. Sanofi Research Report No SPP0111, 1998.
  35. ↵
    Massari C., Brienza S., Rotarski M., Gastiaburu J., Misset J. L., Cupissol D., Alafaci E., Dutertre-Catella H., Bastian G. Pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin in patients with normal versus impaired renal function. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., 45: 157-164, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    Graham M. A., Lockwood G. F., Cunningham D., Gamelin E. Pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin in special patient populations. Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Annu. Meet., 18: 189 1999.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    Papamichael D., Joel S. P., Seymour M. T., Richards F., Bowerbank M., Slevin M. L. Pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction between 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and oxaliplatin (l-OHP). Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Annu. Meet., 17: 202 1998.
  38. ↵
    Papamichael, D., Joel, S. P., Seymour, M. T., Richards, F., Bowerbank, M., Slevin, M. L., and Graham, M. A. Pharmacokinetic interaction between 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin. Sanofi Research Report No. INT3681, 1998.
  39. ↵
    Calvert, H., Judson, I., and Van der Vijgh, W. J. F. Platinum complexes in cancer medicine: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in relation to toxicity and therapeutic activity. In: P. Workman, and M. A. Graham (eds.), Cancer Surveys, Vol. 17: Pharmacokinetics and Cancer Chemotherapy, pp. 189–217. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1993.
  40. ↵
    Gamelin, E., and Allain, P. Pharmacokinetic behavior of oxaliplatin in repeated administration at 130 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Debiopharm/Sanofi Report No. BDR3103, 1995.
  41. ↵
    Lokiec F., Wasserman E., Cvitkovic E., Santoni J., Weill S., Gauzan M. F., Misset J. L. Final results of the pharmacokinetic study of both CPT-11 (C) and LOHP (L) in combination during a Phase I trial in gastrointestinal cancer patients. Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Annu. Meet., 17: 202 1998.
  42. ↵
    Luo F. R., Wyrick S. D., Chaney S. G. Cytotoxicity, cellular uptake, and cellular biotransformations of oxaliplatin in human colon carcinoma cell lines. Oncol. Res., 10: 595-603, 1998.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  43. ↵
    Schrijvers D., Highley M., DeBruyn E., Van Oosterom A. T., Vermorken J. B. Role of red blood cells in pharmacokinetics of chemotherapeutic agents. Anticancer Drugs, 10: 147-153, 1999.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  44. ↵
    Uriens, S., and Tillement, J. P. In vitro binding of oxaliplatin to human serum proteins. Drug interactions. Debiopharm Study Report No. LPH0022, 1995.
  45. ↵
    Misset, J. L., Gamelin, E., and Allain, P. Oxaliplatin-induced platinum DNA adducts in white blood cells of cancer patients. Debiopharm/Sanofi Report No. MIH0035, 1995.
  46. ↵
    Petros W. P., Chaney S. G., Smith D. C., Fangmeier J., Sakata M., Brown T. D., Trump D. L. Pharmacokinetic and biotransformation studies of ormaplatin in conjunction with Phase I clinical trial. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., 33: 347-354, 1994.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  47. Schilder R. J., La Creta F. P., Perez R. P., Johnson S. W., Brennan J. M., Rogatko A., Nash S., McAker C., Hamilton T. C., Roby D., Young R. C., Ozols R. F., O’Dwyer P. J. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of ormaplatin (tetraplatin, NSC 363812) administrated on a day 1 and day 8 schedule. Cancer Res., 54: 709-717, 1994.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    Vermorken J. B., Van der Vijgh W. J., Klein I., Hart A. A., Gall H. E., Pinedo H. M. Pharmacokinetics of free and total platinum species after short-term infusion of cisplatin. Cancer Treat. Rep., 68: 503-513, 1984.
    OpenUrl
  49. ↵
    Elferink F., Van der Vijgh W. J. F., Klein I., Vermorken J. B., Gall H. E., Pinedo H. M. Pharmacokinetics of diammine (1,1-cyclobutane dicarboxylato) platinum (II) (carboplatin) after intravenous administration. Cancer Treat. Rep., 71: 1231-1237, 1987.
    OpenUrlPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
April 2000
Volume 6, Issue 4
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by Author

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

 patientACCESS
Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Clinical Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Oxaliplatin: A Critical Review
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical Cancer Research.
Citation Tools
Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Oxaliplatin: A Critical Review
Martin A. Graham, Graham F. Lockwood, Dennis Greenslade, Silvano Brienza, Martine Bayssas and Erick Gamelin
Clin Cancer Res April 1 2000 (6) (4) 1205-1218;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Oxaliplatin: A Critical Review
Martin A. Graham, Graham F. Lockwood, Dennis Greenslade, Silvano Brienza, Martine Bayssas and Erick Gamelin
Clin Cancer Res April 1 2000 (6) (4) 1205-1218;
Permalink:
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Overview
    • Selection of Analyte and Matrix for PK Studies
    • PKs of Oxaliplatin
    • Dose Proportionality
    • Infusion Duration
    • Multiple Dose PKs at 130 mg/m2 and 85 mg/m2
    • Peak Platinum Exposure (Cmax)
    • Platinum Exposure (AUC)
    • Platinum Half-life (t1/2)
    • Platinum Clearance
    • Platinum Volume of Distribution (Vss)
    • Platinum Accumulation (Rac)
    • Platinum Accumulation and Steady State (Css)
    • Variability in Ultrafilterable Platinum PKs
    • Platinum Distribution In Vitro and In Vivo
    • Biotransformation and Metabolic Fate of Oxaliplatin
    • Platinum Elimination
    • PKs in Special Patient Populations
    • Drug-Drug Interactions
    • Drug-Drug Interaction Assessments In Vitro
    • Comparative PKs of Oxaliplatin, Cisplatin, Carboplatin, and Tetraplatin
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Guide to Clinical Exposures of Anticancer Drugs
  • In vitro selection of safe T cell receptors
  • miRNAs as Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers
Show more Review
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • CCR Focus Archive
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians
  • Reviewers

About Clinical Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit
  • Feedback
AACR logo

Copyright © 2017 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Clinical Cancer Research
eISSN: 1557-3265
ISSN: 1078-0432

Advertisement