Table 2.
A. Summary of four prediction models (n = 54)
Median (range)Kattan nomogram
GEMCaP score
FixedFloatingIntegrated
Controls14% (0%-50%)21% (0%-74%)16% (3%-66%)93% (40%-99%)
Cases18% (3%-46%)29% (0%-77%)23% (3%-64%)53% (3%-96%)
B. Agreement in classification between GEMCaP and the nomogram
Agreement in classification*
% Favorable% Unfavorable% Total
Nomogram and:
    Fixed threshold52%9%61%
    Floating threshold28%17%45%
    Integrated threshold37%13%50%
    All three GEMCaP models26%9%35%
  • *Favorable is defined as a GEMCaP score of <20% and as a nomogram probability of ≥40%.