Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Regular Articles

A Comparison of the in Vitro and in Vivo Activities of IgG and F(ab′)2 Fragments of a Mixture of Three Monoclonal Anti-Her-2 Antibodies

Camelia I. Spiridon, Sarah Guinn and Ellen S. Vitetta
Camelia I. Spiridon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Guinn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ellen S. Vitetta
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0549 Published May 2004
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    SDS-PAGE of the purified F(ab′)2 preparations of the anti-Her-2 monoclonal antibodies. The mixture of F(ab′)2 preparations was analyzed by SDS-PAGE under nonreducing conditions using the PhastGel System. Gels were stained with Coomassie Blue. Lanes 1 and 6, standard high molecular mass protein markers with molecular weights of 212, 170, 116, 76, and 53 kDa; Lane 2, Herceptin, IgG; Lane 3, F(ab′)2 fragments of Herceptin; Lane 4, a mixture of HER-50, HER-66, and HER-70 IgGs; Lane 5, mixtures of F(ab′)2 fragments of HER-50, HER-66, and HER-70. F(ab′)2 fragments have a molecular mass of ∼100 kDa, whereas the whole IgG is ∼150 kDa. Scanning the gel by using the Pharmacia LKB UltroScan XL indicated that the F(ab′)2 fragments of the mixture F(ab′)2 and Herceptin F(ab′)2 preparations tested were >95% pure.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    F(ab′)2 fragments of anti-Her-2 monoclonal antibodies do not induce antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) or complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) against BT474 cells in vitro. A (ADCC), flow cytometric analysis was performed on the 5-(and-6)-carboxyfluorescein diacetate, succinimidylester-stained effector cells (mouse spleen cells) using propidium iodide to stain BT474 cells treated with a mixture of F(ab′)2 fragments (1 μg/105 cells) from HER-50, HER-66, and HER-70 (•); the same molar amount of a mixture IgG1s (○); or F(ab′)2 (▾) and IgG (▿) of the isotype-matched control at the same molar concentrations. Negative control BT474 cells were left untreated (▪), and positive control cells were treated with 10 mg/ml NaN3 (□). The E:T ratios were 10:1, 50:1, and 100:1. B (CDC), target BT474 cells were treated with F(ab′)2 fragments (1 μg/105 cells) or the same molar amount of IgGs and mixed with 1:10-, 1:50-, and 1:100-fold dilutions of mouse serum as a source of complement for the CDC assays. Mixture of F(ab′)2 fragments from HER-50, HER-66, and HER-70, •; mixture of HER-50, HER-66, and HER-70 IgG1s, ○; or F(ab′)2 (▾) and IgG (▿) of the isotype-matched control at the same molar concentrations. Negative control BT474 cells were left untreated (▪), and positive control cells were treated with 10 mg/ml NaN3 (□). Both panels depict one representative experiment of three experiments performed. The difference between the percentage of lysis by the mixtures of F(ab′)2 versus IgGs is statistically significant (P = 0.082). Relative to the isotype-matched control, the effect of the IgG mixture treatment is statistically significant (P = 2.12 × 10−3). The F(ab′)2 mixture is not statistically significant from its isotype-matched control (P = 0.67).

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    F(ab′)2 fragments of HER-50, HER-66, and HER-70 inhibit the secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) by BT474 cells in vitro. Cell supernatants were harvested from 5 × 105 BT474 cells treated with various concentrations of a mixture of F(ab′)2 fragments (•) or IgGs at the same molar concentrations (○) and the F(ab′)2 (▾) and IgG (▿) of the isotype-matched control at the same molar concentrations. VEGF levels were measured using a competitive ELISA kit. This assay can detect 0.195–200 ng/ml VEGF. Untreated BT474 cells secrete approximately 80 ng VEGF/ml/5 × 105 cells over 72 h (▪), and cells treated with 10 mg/ml NaN3 inhibited VEGF secretion (□). The difference between the effect of mixtures of the F(ab′)2 versus IgGs is not statistically significant (P = 0.87). Relative to their isotype-matched controls, the effect of IgG1 mixture and F(ab′)2 mixture is statistically significant (P < 6.95 × 10−4. This is a representative experiment of three such experiments performed.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    BT474 cells are killed in vitro by both the mixture of IgGs and their F(ab′)2 fragments. BT474 cells were treated with varying concentrations of the mixture of F(ab′)2 fragments (•), IgGs (○) at the same molar concentrations, and F(ab′)2 (▾) and IgG (▿) of the isotype-matched control at the same molar concentrations. Untreated BT474 cells were used as a negative control, and positive control cells were treated with 10 mg/ml NaN3 (□) for 72 h and then pulsed with [3H]thymidine for 6 h. Growth inhibition, expressed as the IC50, was calculated by comparing [3H]thymidine incorporation in treated versus untreated cells. The difference between the IC50 values of the F(ab′)2 fragment mixture and the monoclonal antibody mixture is not statistically significant (P = 0.3). Relative to the isotype-matched control, the IC50 values of F(ab′)2 mixture and IgG mixture are statistically significant (P < 0.02). This is one representative experiment of three such experiments performed.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Biodistribution of 125I-HER-50 IgG1 or 125I-HER-50 F(ab′)2 in tumor-bearing mice. After i.p. injection of a dose of 33.3 μg/animal (4.8 × 108 cpm) of radiolabeled HER-50 IgG (A) or its F(ab′)2 fragment (B), levels of radioactivity were measured at 24 (hatched box), 48 (white box), and 72 h (gray box) using a gamma counter. The results are expressed relative to the injected dose and organ weight or ml of serum (absolute percentage of initial injected dose/g tissue or ml of serum). This is one representative experiment of three such experiments performed.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    The mixture of F(ab′)2 fragments is less effective than the mixture of anti-Her-2 monoclonal antibodies in vivo. Because of the differences in half-lives between the IgGs and the F(ab′)2 values in vivo, 5-fold greater amounts of the F(ab′)2 monoclonal antibodies were administered. Groups of five preirradiated severe combined immunodeficient mice with 200-mm3 s.c. BT474 breast tumors received i.p. injection with one dose of 1500 μg (75 μg/g mouse) of a mixture of F(ab′)2 fragments (•), 300 μg (15 μg/g mouse) of a mixture of the three IgGs (○), 75 μg/g mouse of F(ab′)2 fragments of the isotype-matched control (▾), 75 μg/g mouse of F(ab′)2 fragments of Herceptin (▿), and 15 μg/g mouse Herceptin IgG (□). The mean tumor volume (mm3) ± SD for the five mice in each group was plotted. The difference between the effects of the mixture of our murine IgGs and Herceptin IgG versus the control are significant (Ps < 1.3 × 10−5). The difference between the effects of the mixture of F(ab′)2 and Herceptin F(ab′)2 versus the control is not significant (Ps < 0.1). The differences between the effects of the mixture of F(ab′)2 and IgG and between Herceptin F(ab′)2 and Herceptin IgG are significant (Ps < 7.6 × 10−4). Animals were euthanized when tumor burdens exceeded 1500 mm3 or 10% of total body weight.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1

    Characterization of the anti-Her-2 F(ab′)2 fragments and IgGs

    AntibodyDirect immunofluorescencePharmacokinetics parameters in SCID micec
    Relative binding affinity (×10−9m)a% Positive cells (100 μg/105 cells)MFIbt1/2 (h)AUC (μg-h/ml)MRT (h)FCR (day−1)
    F(ab′)2
     HER-500.23 ± 0.1297.3 ± 1.6181.3 ± 24.225.6 ± 20.91456.8 ± 9.691.8 ± 0.11.54 ± 0.035
     HER-665.88 ± 9.8897.1 ± 1.5155.1 ± 25.8N/DN/DN/DN/D
     HER-702333.3 ± 1247.290.53 ± 1.9552.1 ± 19.4N/DN/DN/DN/D
     Herceptin0.5 ± 0.297.48 ± 0.54157.7 ± 12.4N/DN/DN/DN/D
    IgG1
     HER-500.1 ± 0d93.37 ± 4.2160.9 ± 51.9149.8 ± 100.930847.3 ± 950.9222.9 ± 14.90.075 ± 0.004
     HER-666.07 ± 8.4396.83 ± 1.44209.2 ± 61.9N/DN/DN/DN/D
     HER-701433.3 ± 1144.182.15 ± 2.2569.0 ± 52.9N/DN/DN/DN/D
     Herceptin0.1 ± 097.6 ± 0.85212.9 ± 64.0N/DN/DN/DN/D
    • a Cells (105 cells/ml) were treated with different concentrations of FITC-anti-Her-2 F(ab′)2 and IgGs, followed by FACScan analysis. The percentage of positive cells was plotted versus the F(ab′)2or IgG concentrations to determine the concentration necessary to reach 50% saturation of cells (i.e., the relative binding affinity).

    • b MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; SCID, severe combined immunodeficient; t1/2 (h), half-life; AUC (μg-h/ml), area under the curve; MRT (h), mean residence time; FCR (day−1), fractional catabolic rate; N/D, not done.

    • c The results are expressed as percentage of initial radioactivity relative to the amount of whole body radioactivity after i.p. injection of 100 μg of 125I-radiolabeled protein (33.3 μg/animal, with a radioactive load of 0.3–1 × 107 cpm). The pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using a noncompartmental model with the PKCALC program.

    • d SDs are based on at least three experiments.

  • Table 2

    A mixture of three anti-Her-2 F(ab′)2 fragments induces similar growth inhibition and apoptosis as the mixture of three anti-Her-2 IgGs in vitro

    AntibodyIC50 × 10−8 (m)a% Annexin-V+ cellsb% PI+ cellsb,c% Total dead cells
    F(ab′)2
     Mixture0.43 ± 0.32d28.0 ± 0.0331.6 ± 14.559.6 ± 7.3
     Herceptin1.3 ± 0.015.9 ± 2.912.1 ± 3.128 ± 3.0
     RFT5 (control)582.5 ± 428.32.3 ± 1.61.8 ± 1.74.1 ± 1.7
    IgG1
     Mixture0.1 ± 0.0428.4 ± 0.738.2 ± 5.966.6 ± 3.3
     Herceptin0.3 ± 0.136.4 ± 2.210.0 ± 8.546.4 ± 4.3
     RFT5 (control)233.8 ± 167.80.7 ± 0.20.7 ± 0.31.4 ± 0.3
    Other
     NoneNA0.6 ± 0.20.64 ± 0.121.24 ± 0.2
     NaN3e0.004 ± 0.00343.8 ± 9.049.2 ± 11.993 ± 5.3
    • a Cells (2.5 × 105 cells/ml) were incubated for 72 h at 37°C with different concentrations of anti-Her-2 monoclonal antibodies or F(ab′)2s and then pulsed with [3H]thymidine for 6 h. IC50 values represent the concentration of monoclonal antibodies required to kill 50% of cells. The difference between the IC50in each treatment group versus untreated control is statistically significant, with Ps < 0.01.

    • b Cells (2.5 × 105 cells/ml) were incubated for 4 h at 37°C with 300 μg/ml anti-Her-2 monoclonal antibodies or F(ab′)2s and then stained with annexin-V FITC plus propidium iodide (50 μg/ml) and analyzed by FACScan. The percentage of total dead cells is the sum of the percentage of annexin-V-FITC-positive plus propidium iodide-positive cells. The difference between the percentage of annexin-V-positive cells in each treatment group versus untreated control is statistically significant, with Pvalues < 0.04. The difference between the percentage of propidium iodide-positive cells in each treatment group versus untreated control is statistically significant, with Pvalues < 0.01.

    • c PI, propidium iodide; NA, not applicable (because the untreated control values were taken as 100%).

    • d SD are based on at least three experiments.

    • e Positive control.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Clinical Cancer Research: 10 (10)
May 2004
Volume 10, Issue 10
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Clinical Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Comparison of the in Vitro and in Vivo Activities of IgG and F(ab′)2 Fragments of a Mixture of Three Monoclonal Anti-Her-2 Antibodies
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
A Comparison of the in Vitro and in Vivo Activities of IgG and F(ab′)2 Fragments of a Mixture of Three Monoclonal Anti-Her-2 Antibodies
Camelia I. Spiridon, Sarah Guinn and Ellen S. Vitetta
Clin Cancer Res May 15 2004 (10) (10) 3542-3551; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0549

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
A Comparison of the in Vitro and in Vivo Activities of IgG and F(ab′)2 Fragments of a Mixture of Three Monoclonal Anti-Her-2 Antibodies
Camelia I. Spiridon, Sarah Guinn and Ellen S. Vitetta
Clin Cancer Res May 15 2004 (10) (10) 3542-3551; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0549
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Regular Articles

  • Combination Antiangiogenic and Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
  • Lactoferrin Down-Regulates G1 Cyclin-Dependent Kinases during Growth Arrest of Head and Neck Cancer Cells
  • ZD6474, a Potent Inhibitor of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Signaling, Combined With Radiotherapy
Show more Regular Articles

Experimental Therapeutics, Preclinical Pharmacology

  • Antifolate Resistance in a HeLa Cell Line Associated With Impaired Transport Independent of the Reduced Folate Carrier
  • Ring Finger Protein 43 as a New Target for Cancer Immunotherapy
  • Selective Induction of Apoptosis with Proton Pump Inhibitor in Gastric Cancer Cells
Show more Experimental Therapeutics, Preclinical Pharmacology
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • CCR Focus Archive
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Clinical Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Clinical Cancer Research
eISSN: 1557-3265
ISSN: 1078-0432

Advertisement