Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Regular Articles

Absence of a Correlation between the Presence of a Single Nucleotide Polymorphism in the Matrix Metalloproteinase 1 Promoter and Outcome in Patients of Chondrosarcoma

Yi-Chin Fong, Charyl M. Dutton, Stephen S. Cha, Nandor Garamszegi, Franklin H. Sim and Sean P. Scully
Yi-Chin Fong
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charyl M. Dutton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen S. Cha
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nandor Garamszegi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Franklin H. Sim
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sean P. Scully
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0900 Published November 2004
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Purpose: Increased levels of matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP-1) expression have been associated with poor outcome in chondrosarcoma. The existence of a single nucleotide polymorphism creating an Ets-binding site in the MMP-1 promoter may be one mechanism for elevated MMP-1 transcription. The aim of our study was to identify the prevalence of this single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in chondrosarcoma patients, to determine its correlation with disease outcome, and to discern whether it could serve as a prognostic marker in patients with chondrosarcoma.

Experimental Design: Sixty-seven chondrosarcoma specimens were selected sequentially from an established tumor bank with a median duration of 47 months follow-up (range, 24 to 179 months). DNA was extracted, amplified with PCR, and sequenced to determine presence (GG) or absence of the Ets-binding site created by the SNP.

Results: Eighteen (27%) samples were homozygous for the absence of the Ets site, 34 (51%) were heterozygous for the SNP, and 15 (22%) were homozygous for the SNP. The 5-year overall survival rate for patients was 78, 80, and 84%, respectively (P = 0.5527). The disease-free survival rate was 16, 63, and 76%, respectively (P = 0.0801). The 5-year disease-free survival rate for patients with the homozygous G/G genotype was 16%, compared with 71% for patients who were either homozygous or heterozygous for the GG allele (P = 0.0444).

Conclusions: Despite a statistical correlation between MMP-1 gene expression and outcome in chondrosarcoma, this study demonstrates an absence of a correlation between the presence of the SNP and prognosis in patients with chondrosarcoma.

INTRODUCTION

Chondrosarcoma is a malignant primary bone tumor that does not respond to current chemotherapy or radiation treatment, and wide surgical resection remains the primary mode of treatment. Histologic grading, which is subjective, is the current standard to predict prognosis of human chondrosarcoma. An objective form of prognostication would be of clinical value and could serve as the basis of a novel therapeutic intervention.

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) play an important role in the modeling and remodeling of the extracellular matrix in both the normal and diseased physiologic states. It has been demonstrated that MMPs can contribute to the processes of tumor invasion and metastasis by influencing the capacity of tumor cells to transverse tissue boundaries (1) . It has been previously shown that patients with high levels of interstitial collagenase (MMP-1) expression have poorer outcome, especially in esophageal, colorectal, and melanoma tumors (2, 3, 4) . Several studies indicate that MMP activity or expression could be a useful parameter for determining prognosis in patients with chondrosarcoma (5 , 6) . Increased levels of MMP-1 expression were found in patients with recurrence, as compared with chondrosarcoma patients that remained disease-free (7 , 8) . Thus, increased MMP-1 expression may denote more aggressive tumor activity and dissemination that is facilitated by extracellular matrix degradation and a complex sequence of biological signaling that ensues (9) .

Many molecules that induce MMP-1, such as nuclear factor-κB, tumor necrosis factor α, and transforming growth factor β, require the activator protein 1 (AP-1) site to exert their influence and implicate c-fos and c-jun in MMP transcriptional regulation (10, 11, 12) . The level of MMP-1 expression, and hence, its potential to mediate connective tissue degradation and tumor progression, can be influenced by a genetic variation in the MMP-1 promoter (13, 14, 15) . One proposed mechanism that could augment MMP-1 expression is the presence of an Ets transcription factor-binding site that results from the addition of a single guanine base at −1607 bp in the MMP-1 promoter sequence adjacent to an AP-1 site (15) . At this loci, either a single guanine or a double quanine is found with a sequence of 5′-AAAGAT-3′ or 5′-AAAGGAT-3′. Sequencing of the promoter in human leukocytes from genomic libraries revealed that 30% have a homozygous double guanine genotype at this locus. The addition of a second guanine base 5′-AAAGGAT-3′ results in the creation of the triplet 5′-GGA-3′, which constitutes a consensus sequence for an Ets-binding site (PEA-3) upstream from the AP-1–binding site (16) . This single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), located within a PEA3 site, has been termed an oncogene-responsive unit and has been correlated with prognosis in several human malignant tumors, including esophageal, colorectal, and melanoma (2, 3, 4 , 17) . The resultant interaction of these two sites and the synergistic effect of Ets- and AP-1–binding factors lead to increased levels of expression on the MMP-1 gene in ovarian carcinoma (18 , 19) , colorectal carcinoma (20, 21, 22) , lung carcinoma (23) , endometrial carcinoma (24) , as well as melanoma (25) . If the presence of the Ets-binding site correlates with the level of MMP-1 expression in chondrosarcoma, this could provide the basis for objective prognostication and possibly a novel therapeutic target.

The aim of our study was to identify the prevalence of this SNP in the tumor tissue of chondrosarcoma patients to determine the correlation with disease outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-seven tumor specimens, obtained during resections from January 1980 through July 2001, were selected sequentially from an established chondrosarcoma tumor bank at the Mayo Clinic Foundation. The selection criteria included available follow-up records on the patients, details of the operative and adjuvant therapy, and appropriate processing of the resected specimen. Approval from the Institutional Review Board was obtained. The patient group consisted of 22 females and 45 males and ranged in age from 16 to 87 years (mean, 54 years). The three-tiered histologic grading system, described by Lichtenstein and Jaffe (26) , was used. Cytologically, increased cellularity and cytological atypia are the most important features, and these characteristics are used to determine the grade of the chondrosarcoma. The patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years or until death. The median duration of follow-up of the living patients was 47 months (range, 24 to 179 months).

The DNA was extracted from tumor tissue using a commercial kit (Pure Gene, Gentra, Minneapolis, MN). PCR primers and sequencing primers were designed with the aid of a commercial program (Gene Fisher, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA). Primers for PCR amplification were as follows: sense, 5′-GAGTCACTTCAGTGGCAA-3′; and antisense, 5′-TGTCTTGGGTACTGGTGA-3′. PCR conditions were optimized to produce only the single band of interest with the FastTAQ PCR kit (Roche, Indianapolis, IN). The reaction conditions were as follows: 250 ng of DNA, 200 μmol/L deoxynucleotide triphosphate, 3.75 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.4 μmol/L of each primer, and 1.25 units of TaqDNA polymerase. PCR reactions were denatured for 5 minutes at 94°C, amplified for 25 cycles of 30 seconds at 94°C, 30 seconds at 55°C, and 45 seconds at 72°C, followed by a 7-minute extension at 72°C.

The amplification product was run on a 2% agarose gel with ethidium bromide to confirm the presence of a single 470-bp PCR product. The PCR products were purified with a QIAquick PCR Purification kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA), sent to the Molecular Biology Core Facility (Mayo Clinic Foundation, Rochester, MN) for preparation of the sequencing reactions with a Big Dye Terminator v3.0 Cycle Sequencing kit with Amplitaq DNA polymerase, FS (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), and evaluated with an Applied Biosystems 3730 DNA analyzer. DNA sequencing was performed to identify the presence (GG) or absence (G) of the SNP at the bp of interest, as well as to determine whether the tumor sample genotype was heterozygous (G/GG) or homozygous (GG/GG) for the SNP. Sequences that were homozygous for either the single guanine (G/G; Fig. 1A⇓ ) or the double guanine (GG/GG; Fig. 1B⇓ ) have a clear sequence downstream from the locus of interest. The G/GG heterozygous sequence (Fig. 1C)⇓ was not interpretable downstream of the SNP locus as a result of the overlapping sequence created by the insertion of the guanine base in one allele. The PCR amplicon was sequenced in both directions with forward (5′-CTGATGCCTCTGAGAAGAGGAT-3′) and reverse (5′-CACTTCAGCACCTTATGGTGT-3′) sequencing primers to confirm the identity of the SNP at −1607 bp in the MMP-1 promoter. Having concurrent sequence in both directions virtually eliminates the possibility of compression artifacts because compression does not typically occur at the same site on both strands. Template concentration was titered, and only sequences with optimal peak amplitudes were used for genotype determination.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

A, homozygous G/G genotype with single G peak and clean sequence. B, homozygous GG/GG genotype with double G peak and clean sequence. C, heterozygous G/GG genotype with double G peak and uninterpretable sequence.

Sample Size and Data Analysis.

This is a retrospective study in which 67 tumor specimens were collected during the study timeframe. This population has an 81% power to detect a 35% difference in 5-year survival using the log-rank statistics with α level < 0.05. Statistical correlation of SNP genotypes with gender, age, and tumor grade was determined using Mantel-Haenszel χ2 analysis for categorical variables. The estimated rates of overall survival and disease-free survival (neither local recurrence nor metastasis) were calculated according to the Kaplan Meier method (27) . Log-rank statistics were used to compare survival differences between groups. The Cox proportional hazard model was adopted to perform the multivariate analysis to ascertain the independent prognostic parameters. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

At the time of last clinical follow-up, 36 patients (54%) were alive without disease, 15 (22%) were alive with disease, 4 (6%) were dead of other causes without disease, and 12 (18%) had died of the disease. Histologic evaluation by experienced musculoskeletal pathologists indicated 35 patients had a grade 1 lesion, 23 patients a grade 2 lesion, and 9 patients a grade 3 lesion. Amplification of the MMP-1 promoter and sequencing indicated that 18 (27%) samples were G/G homozygous without the SNP, 34 (51%) were G/GG heterozygous for the SNP, and 15 (22%) were GG/GG homozygous for the SNP.

The patient characteristics for each genotype of the MMP-1 promoter are presented (Table 1)⇓ . The genotype had no correlation identified with gender, age, or tumor grade. The 5-year overall survival rate for G/G homozygous patients was 78%, compared with 80 and 84% in G/GG heterozygous and GG/GG homozygous patients, respectively (P = 0.5527; Fig. 2⇓ ). The local recurrence rate for patients with the G/G genotype was 50%, compared with 26.47 and 26.67% in patients with the G/GG and GG/GG genotypes, respectively (P = 0.1338; Table 2⇓ ). The metastatic rate for patients with the G/G genotype was 33.33%, compared with 23.53 and 0% in patients with the G/GG and GG/GG genotypes, respectively (P = 0.0221). The disease-free survival rate of patients with the G/G genotype was 6%, compared with 63 and 76% in patients with the G/GG and GG/GG genotypes, respectively (P = 0.0801; Fig. 3⇓ ). There is not a significant difference in overall survival or disease-free survival between the three genotypes.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Kaplan-Meier curve for the overall survival rate stratified by the MMP-1 promoter SNP genotype. Overall two-sided P = 0.5527. Comparison of the G/G versus G/GG genotypes produced P = 0.8564. Comparison of G/G with GG/GG genotypes produced P = 0.2887.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Kaplan-Meier curve illustrating the disease-free survival rate of different MMP-1 promoter SNP genotypes. Overall two-sided P = 0.0801. Comparison of the G/G versus G/GG genotypes produced P = 0.2200. Comparison of the G/G versus GG/GG genotypes produced P = 0.0090.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

The table shows the frequency of patient characteristics with different MMP-1 promoter SNP genotypes

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Comparison of local recurrence and metastasis rates between different MMP-1 promoter SNP genotypes

Statistical evaluation of overall and disease-free survival rates was performed after grouping patients who possessed the GG allele into one group (G/GG + GG/GG) and comparing it to the patients who were homozygous for single G allele. The 5-year overall survival rate for patients with the G/G allele was 78%, compared with 81% in patients with the GG allele (P = 0.5465). The 5-year disease-free survival rate for patients with the homozygous G/G genotype was 16%, compared with 71% in patients with the GG allele (P = 0.0444; Fig. 4⇓ ). The prognosis for disease-free survival in patients with the GG allele was better than those homozygous for the single G.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Kaplan-Meier curve demonstrating a significant difference in the disease-free survival rates when comparing the G/G genotype group to a combined group containing both G/GG and GG/GG genotypes. Overall two-sided P = 0.044.

A Cox proportional hazard model was constructed to determine statistically significant independent prognostic variables (Table 3)⇓ . Gender, age, and the presence of the SNP did not reach statistical significance as independent prognostic factors. The tumor grade was the most dominant prognostic variable of disease-free or overall survival.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3

Cox proportional hazard model analysis of independent prognostic variables.

DISCUSSION

The SNP located at −1607 bp in the MMP-1 promoter creates an Ets-binding site and has been reported to contribute to significantly higher transcription in normal fibroblasts and melanoma cells (15) . The SNP has been proposed as a mechanism for elevating MMP-1 gene expression and for facilitating tumor progression by mediating enhanced degradation of the interstitial matrix. The mechanism mediating the increase in MMP-1 expression by the SNP has not been elucidated. In chondrosarcoma, esophageal cancer, colorectal carcinoma, and melanoma, patients with increased levels of MMP-1 expression have poorer outcome with tumor invasion and metastasis (2, 3, 4 , 7 , 8 , 17) .

It has been reported that melanoma, ovarian, and endometrial carcinoma tissue from patients carrying the GG allele contain higher levels of MMP-1 transcripts compared with those from patients not carrying this allele (18 , 24 , 25) . Rutter et al. (15) presented that the SNP was not a mutation because the frequency of genotyping of 100 control individuals indicated that the distribution of this SNP in the normal population is approximately: 31%, G/G homozygous; 30%, GG/GG homozygous; and 39%, G/GG heterozygous. In contrast, in eight tumor cell lines, the frequency of GG/GG genotype increased to 62.5% (15) . In the present study, the genotype frequency of G/GG heterozygotes and GG/GG homozygotes was 51 and 22%, respectively. The genotype frequencies for the MMP-1 promoter SNP in chondrosarcoma tumor tissue were similar to reported allele frequencies for control groups and melanoma patients but were different from reported allele frequencies for ovarian and endometrial carcinoma patients, as well as tumor cell lines (Table 4)⇓ . This suggests that this is a somatic rather than a tumor induced genotype.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4

Major series in different tumor patients reporting the frequency of each genotype of the MMP-1 promoter

The current study did not identify a correlation between the presence of SNP in the MMP-1 promoter and prognosis in patients with chondrosarcoma. This is despite the fact that MMP-1 expression has been correlated with outcome in this disease process. To our knowledge, this is the first report of an absence of relevance of this SNP in prognosis in patients with malignancy. There was no significant difference in overall survival (P = 0.5527) or disease-free survival (P = 0.0801) in patients with the three different genotypes at −1607 bp. Comparison of outcomes, stratifying by genotype within each tumor grade, was hampered by small sample sizes. A significant difference does exist with an inverse correlation between the presence of the SNP and disease-free survival (P = 0.0444). Such an observation could be explained by steric inhibition at the AP-1 site by Ets transcription factors (28) . Incorporating tumor grade into the Cox proportional hazard model for overall survival or disease-free survival indicated this was not independently statistically significant. These findings indicate that the SNP is not an independent prognosticator of outcome in patients with chondrosarcoma.

The mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway regulates MMP-1 gene expression by activating cofactors that interact with AP-1 and polyoma-enhancing activity–3/E26 virus (PEA3/Ets) transcription factor-binding sites located within the promoter region. The inhibition of Fra-1 expression, an AP-1 transcription factor component, preferentially down-regulates transcription from the MMP-1 promoter DNA containing the GG SNP allele, compared with DNA contain the single G allele in melanoma cells (29 , 30) . Ets transcription factors can positively and negatively activate transcription by interaction with coregulatory-binding partners or by regulating phosphorylation (28 , 29 , 31) . This suggests that Ets family proteins and partner proteins may differ in various cell types (32) . Alternatively, other pathways regulating MMP-1 expression may act independently of the SNP at −1607 bp (33) .

Although various human tumor tissues have demonstrated coexpression of Ets factor and MMPs, there was no correlation between Ets expression and metastasis in pancreatic and thyroid carcinoma (34 , 35) . Many unresolved issues of Ets function still remain, and additional investigation will be required (36) . Transcriptional regulation is a complex process that is often influenced by tissue-specific factors. Therefore, it is possible that MMP-1 transcriptional regulation is not directly increased by the presence of this Ets-binding site in chondrosarcoma tumors because it has been demonstrated to be in epithelial tumors. This suggests that the gene expression secondary to this SNP is tissue specific and varies functionally between different disease processes (14) .

The histologic determination of tumor grade and subsequent clinical course of chondrosarcoma is subjective in nature, and more objective methods have been unsuccessfully sought to assess prognosis (37) . Although the current study reveals that SNP is not an independent prognostic parameter to predict the outcome of patients with chondrosarcoma, the mechanism regulating MMP-1 gene expression remains an attractive therapeutic target. Additional elucidation of the roles and mechanisms of MMP-1 expression in chondrosarcoma may lead to development of novel therapeutic strategies.

Acknowledgments

We thank Charlene Blanchard for assistance collecting patient data and Teresa A. Hoff for expert assistance with manuscript preparation.

Footnotes

  • Grant support: NIH Grant R01 CA 96796, a Fraternal Order of Eagles’ Cancer Fund Grant 202, and a Charlotte Geyer Foundation Award Grant 4.

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • Requests for reprints: Sean P. Scully, University of Miami, Department of Orthopedics/Rehabilitation, P. O. Box 01690601 (D-27), Miami, FL 33101. Phone: (305) 325-4475; Fax: (305) 325-3928; E-mail: SScully{at}med.miami.edu

  • Received May 7, 2004.
  • Revision received June 22, 2004.
  • Accepted July 28, 2004.

References

  1. ↵
    De Clerck YA, Shimada H, Taylor SM, Langley KE. Matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in tumor progression. Ann NY Acad Sci 1994;732:222-32.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    Shiozawa J, Ito M, Nakayama T, Nakashima M, Kohno S, Sekine I. Expression of matrix metalloproteinase-1 in human colorectal carcinoma. Mod Pathol 2000;13:925-33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Murray GI, Duncan ME, O’Neil P, McKay JA, Melvin WT, Fothergill JE. Matrix metalloproteinase-1 is associated with poor prognosis in oesophageal cancer. J Pathol 1998;185:256-61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Airola K, Karonen T, Vaalamo M, et al Expression of collagenases-1 and -3 and their inhibitors TIMP-1 and -3 correlates with the level of invasion in malignant melanomas. Br J Cancer 1999;80:733-43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Soderstrom M, Aro HT, Ahonen M, et al Expression of matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases in human chondrosarcomas. Apmis 2001;109:305-15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Sakamoto A, Oda Y, Iwamoto Y, Tsuneyoshi M. Expression of membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase, matrix metalloproteinase 2 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2 in human cartilaginous tumors with special emphasis on mesenchymal and dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1999;125:541-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Berend KR, Toth AP, Harrelson JM, Layfield LJ, Hey LA, Scully SP. Association between ratio of matrix metalloproteinase-1 to tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 and local recurrence, metastasis, and survival in human chondrosarcoma. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998;80:11-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Scully SP, Berend KR, Qi WN, Harrelson JM. Collagenase specificity in chondrosarcoma metastasis. Braz J Med Biol Res 1999;32:885-9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    Scully SP, Berend KR, Toth A, Qi WN, Qi Z, Block JA. Marshall Urist Award. Interstitial collagenase gene expression correlates with in vitro invasion in human chondrosarcoma. Clin Orthop 2000;:291-303.
  10. ↵
    Powell WC, Matrisian LM. Complex roles of matrix metalloproteinases in tumor progression. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 1996;213:1-21.
  11. ↵
    Bondeson J, Brennan F, Foxwell B, Feldmann M. Effective adenoviral transfer of IkappaBalpha into human fibroblasts and chondrosarcoma cells reveals that the induction of matrix metalloproteinases and proinflammatory cytokines is nuclear factor-kappaB dependent. J Rheumatol 2000;27:2078-89.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    Basuyaux JP, Ferreira E, Stehelin D, Buttice G. The Ets transcription factors interact with each other and with the c-Fos/c-Jun complex via distinct protein domains in a DNA-dependent and -independent manner. J Biol Chem 1997;272:26188-95.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Brinckerhoff CE, Rutter JL, Benbow U. Interstitial collagenases as markers of tumor progression. Clin Cancer Res 2000;6:4823-30.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Benbow U, Rutter JL, Lowrey CH, Brinckerhoff CE. Transcriptional repression of the human collagenase-1 (MMP-1) gene in MDA231 breast cancer cells by all-trans-retinoic acid requires distal regions of the promoter. Br J Cancer 1999;79:221-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Rutter JL, Mitchell TI, Buttice G, et al A single nucleotide polymorphism in the matrix metalloproteinase-1 promoter creates an Ets binding site and augments transcription. Cancer Res 1998;58:5321-5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Wasylyk B, Hahn SL, Giovane A. The Ets family of transcription factors. Eur J Biochem 1993;211:7-18.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    Murray GI, Duncan ME, O’Neil P, Melvin WT, Fothergill JE. Matrix metalloproteinase-1 is associated with poor prognosis in colorectal cancer. Nat Med 1996;2:461-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Kanamori Y, Matsushima M, Minaguchi T, et al Correlation between expression of the matrix metalloproteinase-1 gene in ovarian cancers and an insertion/deletion polymorphism in its promoter region. Cancer Res 1999;59:4225-7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Ye S. Polymorphism in matrix metalloproteinase gene promoters: implication in regulation of gene expression and susceptibility of various diseases. Matrix Biol 2000;19:623-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Hinoda Y, Okayama N, Takano N, et al Association of functional polymorphisms of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1 and MMP-3 genes with colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer 2002;102:526-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Biondi ML, Turri O, Leviti S, et al MMP1 and MMP3 polymorphisms in promoter regions and cancer. Clin Chem 2000;46:2023-4.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Ghilardi G, Biondi ML, Mangoni J, et al Matrix metalloproteinase-1 promoter polymorphism 1G/2G is correlated with colorectal cancer invasiveness. Clin Cancer Res 2001;7:2344-6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Zhu Y, Spitz MR, Lei L, Mills GB, Wu X. A single nucleotide polymorphism in the matrix metalloproteinase-1 promoter enhances lung cancer susceptibility. Cancer Res 2001;61:7825-9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Nishioka Y, Kobayashi K, Sagae S, et al A single nucleotide polymorphism in the matrix metalloproteinase-1 promoter in endometrial carcinomas. Jpn J Cancer Res 2000;91:612-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Ye S, Dhillon S, Turner SJ, et al Invasiveness of cutaneous malignant melanoma is influenced by matrix metalloproteinase 1 gene polymorphism. Cancer Res 2001;61:1296-8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Lichtenstein L, Jaffe HL. Chondrosarcoma of bone. Am J Pathol 1943;19:553-89.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observation. J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457-81.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. ↵
    Bidder M, Loewy AP, Latifi T, et al Ets domain transcription factor PE1 suppresses human interstitial collagenase promoter activity by antagonizing protein-DNA interactions at a critical AP1 element. Biochemistry 2000;39:8917-28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Tower GB, Coon CI, Belguise K, Chalbos D, Brinckerhoff CE. Fra-1 targets the AP-1 site/2G single nucleotide polymorphism (ETS site) in the MMP-1 promoter. Eur J Biochem 2003;270:4216-25.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    Tower GB, Coon CC, Benbow U, Vincenti MP, Brinckerhoff CE. Erk 1/2 differentially regulates the expression from the 1G/2G single nucleotide polymorphism in the MMP-1 promoter in melanoma cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 2002;1586:265-74.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    Sharrocks AD. The ETS-domain transcription factor family. Nat Rev Mol. Cell Biol 2001;2:827-37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Oikawa T, Yamada T. Molecular biology of the Ets family of transcription factors. Gene (Amst.) 2003;303:11-34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Benbow U, Tower GB, Wyatt CA, Buttice G, Brinckerhoff CE. High levels of MMP-1 expression in the absence of the 2G single nucleotide polymorphism is mediated by p38 and ERK1/2 mitogen-activated protein kinases in VMM5 melanoma cells. J Cell Biochem 2002;86:307-19.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Ito T, Nakayama T, Ito M, Naito S, Kanematsu T, Sekine I. Expression of the ets-1 proto-oncogene in human pancreatic carcinoma. Mod Pathol 1998;11:209-15.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. ↵
    Nakayama T, Ito M, Ohtsuru A, Naito S, Nakashima M, Sekine I. Expression of the ets-1 proto-oncogene in human thyroid tumor. Mod Pathol 1999;12:61-8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. ↵
    Trojanowska M. Ets factors and regulation of the extracellular matrix. Oncogene 2000;19:6464-71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    Rizzo M, Ghert MA, Harrelson JM, Scully SP. Chondrosarcoma of bone: analysis of 108 cases and evaluation for predictors of outcome. Clin Orthop 2001;:224-33.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Clinical Cancer Research: 10 (21)
November 2004
Volume 10, Issue 21
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Clinical Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Absence of a Correlation between the Presence of a Single Nucleotide Polymorphism in the Matrix Metalloproteinase 1 Promoter and Outcome in Patients of Chondrosarcoma
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Absence of a Correlation between the Presence of a Single Nucleotide Polymorphism in the Matrix Metalloproteinase 1 Promoter and Outcome in Patients of Chondrosarcoma
Yi-Chin Fong, Charyl M. Dutton, Stephen S. Cha, Nandor Garamszegi, Franklin H. Sim and Sean P. Scully
Clin Cancer Res November 1 2004 (10) (21) 7329-7334; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0900

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Absence of a Correlation between the Presence of a Single Nucleotide Polymorphism in the Matrix Metalloproteinase 1 Promoter and Outcome in Patients of Chondrosarcoma
Yi-Chin Fong, Charyl M. Dutton, Stephen S. Cha, Nandor Garamszegi, Franklin H. Sim and Sean P. Scully
Clin Cancer Res November 1 2004 (10) (21) 7329-7334; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0900
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Regular Articles

  • A Novel Ex vivo Model System for Evaluation of Conditionally Replicative Adenoviruses Therapeutic Efficacy and Toxicity
  • Prognostic Impact of Hypoxia-Inducible Factors 1α and 2α in Colorectal Cancer Patients
  • Cancer Therapy with a Replicating Oncolytic Adenovirus Targeting the Hypoxic Microenvironment of Tumors
Show more Regular Articles

Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates

  • Prognostic Impact of Hypoxia-Inducible Factors 1α and 2α in Colorectal Cancer Patients
  • Correlation of Protease-Activated Receptor-1 With Differentiation Markers in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck and Its Implication in Lymph Node Metastasis
  • MAP2K4/MKK4 Expression in Pancreatic Cancer
Show more Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • CCR Focus Archive
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Clinical Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Clinical Cancer Research
eISSN: 1557-3265
ISSN: 1078-0432

Advertisement