Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Regular Articles

Overexpression and Amplification of Aurora-A in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Yung-Ming Jeng, Shian-Yang Peng, Chiao-Ying Lin and Hey-Chi Hsu
Yung-Ming Jeng
1Department of Pathology, National Taiwan University Hospital; 2 Graduate Institute of Pathology and 3 Clinical Dentistry, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University; and 4 Department of General Education, National Taipei College of Nursing, Taipei, Taiwan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shian-Yang Peng
1Department of Pathology, National Taiwan University Hospital; 2 Graduate Institute of Pathology and 3 Clinical Dentistry, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University; and 4 Department of General Education, National Taipei College of Nursing, Taipei, Taiwan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chiao-Ying Lin
1Department of Pathology, National Taiwan University Hospital; 2 Graduate Institute of Pathology and 3 Clinical Dentistry, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University; and 4 Department of General Education, National Taipei College of Nursing, Taipei, Taiwan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hey-Chi Hsu
1Department of Pathology, National Taiwan University Hospital; 2 Graduate Institute of Pathology and 3 Clinical Dentistry, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University; and 4 Department of General Education, National Taipei College of Nursing, Taipei, Taiwan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-1057-03 Published March 2004
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Purpose: Aurora-A/STK15/BTAK, a centrosome-associated serine/threonine kinase, has been shown to induce chromosomal instability, leading to aneuploidy and cell transformation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the expression and amplification of Aurora-A in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Experimental Design: Aurora-A mRNA levels were measured in 224 HCCs and 199 paired nontumorous liver tissues by reverse transcription-PCR. Aurora-A mRNA and protein levels of 8 were also measured by reverse transcription-PCR and Western blot hybridization in 8 liver cancer cell lines. Amplification of Aurora-A was determined by Southern blot hybridization in 99 cases.

Results: Aurora-A was overexpressed in 137 of 224 (61%) HCCs and all 8 of the cell lines. Overexpression of Aurora-A was associated with high-grade (grade II-IV), and high-stage (stage IIIB-IV) tumors, p53 mutation, infrequent β-catenin mutation, and poor outcome. Aurora-A overexpression and p53 mutation acted synergistically toward poor prognosis. Amplification of Aurora-A was detected only in 3 HCCs.

Conclusion: The results show that Aurora-A is overexpressed frequently in HCC, and correlated with high grade and high stage, indicating that overexpression of Aurora-A plays a role in the development and progression of HCC.

INTRODUCTION

Carcinogenesis is a multistep process that results from the accumulation of various genetic abnormalities (1) . Loss of genomic stability is believed to be one of the driving forces to the development of a tumor and its progression (2) . In most cancers, the instability is observed at the chromosome level, resulting in losses and gains of whole chromosomes or large portions thereof. Hence, a variety of chromosomal aberrations, such as abnormal ploidy, are common in cancer cells (3 , 4) . The centrosomes are thought to play a crucial role in the maintenance of genomic stability by organizing bipolar spindle during mitosis and by ensuring equal segregation of replicated chromosomes into daughter cells (5) . Centrosome defects, such as changes in centrosome numbers, organization, and behavior, have been found in some breast cancers and solid tumors in general (6, 7, 8) . By increasing the incidence of multipolar spindles and related spindle abnormalities, these defects cause chromosome misaggregation and aneuploidy, which are important for progression of malignancy (6, 7, 8) .

Drosophila aurora and yeast Ipl1 are serine/threonine kinases that are required for centrosome maturation and chromosome aggregation (9, 10) . Mutations in aurora prevent centrosome separation, leading to the formation of monopolar spindles (10) . Homologues of aurora kinase have been identified in Caenorhabditis elegans, Xenopus, mouse, and human (11) . On the basis of the similarities in protein sequences, members of the aurora family are grouped into three classes (A, B, and C; Ref. 12 ). Of the three mammalian aurora homologues, Aurora-A (also called BTAK, STK6, STK15, and Aik1) has attracted intense interest after the discovery that Aurora-A is mapped to chromosome 20q13.2, a region amplified commonly in epithelial cancers (13, 14, 15, 16) . Amplification of Aurora-A was detected in ∼12% of primary breast cancers, as well as in breast, ovarian, colon, prostate, and neuroblastoma cancer cell lines (17) . Besides, Aurora-A is overexpressed frequently at mRNA and protein levels in primary cancers without Aurora-A amplification (18, 19, 20, 21) . Overexpression of Aurora-A transforms NIH3T3 fibroblasts, and induces centrosome abnormality and aneuploidy in near diploid breast cancer cell line (17) , indicating that Aurora-A is oncogenic.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most frequent malignant tumors in southern China, Taiwan, southeastern Asia, and sub-Saharan Africa. HCC is closely associated with hepatitis B and hepatitis C infections, cirrhosis of any etiology, and aflatoxin B1 exposure (22) , but the molecular mechanism for the tumorigenesis of HCC is still poorly understood. Gain of chromosome 20q, where Aurora-A is located, was observed frequently in HCC (23, 24, 25) . To determine the involvement of Aurora-A in HCC, we analyzed the overexpression and amplification of Aurora-A in HCC. Aurora-A mRNA levels were then correlated with various clinicopathological and molecular features.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tissue Samples.

From January 1983 to December 1997, 1033 surgically resected primary and 188 recurrent HCCs were pathologically assessed at the National Taiwan University Hospital. The tissue samples were immediately cut into small pieces, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored in deep freezer. Of these, 224 patients who already had DNA or RNA samples taken from resected primary HCCs were selected for this study. The definition of unifocal HCC was based on combined analyses of pathological features, hepatitis B virus DNA integration pattern, α-fetoprotein mRNA expression, and mutation patterns of β-catenin and p53 genes, as described previously (26, 27, 28) . The 224 patients included 179 males and 45 females with a mean age of 55.26 years (range, 14–88 years). All of the patients had adequate liver function reserve at the time of surgery, and all of the tumors were surgically resectable. Cirrhosis was present in 83 patients (37%), including 22 patients with incomplete septal (early) cirrhosis, whereas 141 patients (63%) had no cirrhosis due to patient selection bias for surgery. None of these patients had received transhepatic arterial embolization or chemotherapy before surgery.

Histological Study and Tumor-Node-Metastasis Staging.

Tumor grade was divided into three groups, well-differentiated (grade I), moderately differentiated (grade II), and poorly differentiated (grade III and IV). The resected HCC was staged as stages I, II, IIIA, IIIB, and IV, as described previously (26 , 29) . The staging was based on the International Union Against Cancer criteria, with slight modification. Stage I HCC included tumors that were ≤2 cm and showed no evidence of liver and vascular invasion. These tumors were either encapsulated with no liver invasion (stage IA) or unencapsulated with liver invasion (stage IB). Stage II HCCs included tumors that were ≤2 cm for which vascular invasion was limited to small vessels in the tumor capsule, as well as encapsulated tumors >2 cm with no evidence of liver or vascular invasion. Stage IIIA HCCs included invasive tumors >2 cm with invasion of small vessels in the tumor capsule and/or satellites near the tumor, but no portal vein invasion. Stage IIIB HCCs included tumors with invasion of the portal vein branch near the tumor, but not of the distant portal vein in the liver parenchyma. Stage IV included tumors with involvement of major portal vein branches, satellites extending deeply into the surrounding liver, tumor rupture, or invasion of the surrounding organs. Seven, 93, 37, 28, and 59 tumor specimens were classified as stage I, II, IIIA, IIIB, and IV HCC, respectively.

The intrahepatic tumor recurrence was based on imaging diagnosis with ultrasonography and/or computed tomography, supplemented with elevated serum α-fetoprotein. Among the 224 patients studied, 205 were eligible for the evaluation of early intrahepatic tumor recurrence (≤1 year). Nineteen patients who died within 1 year after resection and had no information or were negative for intrahepatic tumor recurrence were excluded from the evaluation of early recurrence.

Reverse Transcription-PCR (RT-PCR).

RT-PCR was used to determine the expression of Aurora-A in 224 samples of HCCs and 199 corresponding nontumorous liver parenchyma, as is described elsewhere (29) . S26 ribosomal protein mRNA, a housekeeping gene, was used as the internal control (30) . Briefly, 2 μl reverse transcription product, 1.25 units Pro Taq polymerase (Protech Technology Enterprise, Taipei, Taiwan), Pro Taq buffer, and 200 μm (each) dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP were mixed with primer pairs for Aurora-A and S26 in a total volume of 30 μl. PCR was performed in an automatic DNA thermal cycler 480 (Perkin-Elmer Corp.), with initial heating at 94°C for 2 min, followed by the Touch Down PCR program, 22 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, annealing for 1 min (the annealing temperature is reduced by 1°C per 2 cycles from 65°C to 55°C), 72°C for 1 min, and final 72°C for 10 min. Aurora-A cDNA was amplified using Aurora-A-F (AATTGCAGATTTTGGGTGGT) and Aurora-A-R (AAACTTCAGTAGCATGTTCCTGTC) oligonucleotides. The primers for S26 are S26F (CCGTGCCTCCAAGATGACAAAG) and S26R (GTTCGGTCCTTGCGGGCTTCAC). PCR was stopped at the exponential phase of the amplified genes, 29 cycles for Aurora-A and 23 cycles for S26. The products were electrophoresed on a 2% agarose gel. The concentrations of the PCR fragments were determined with the IS-1000 digital imaging system (Alpha Innotech, San Leandro, CA). The Aurora-A mRNA levels were determined by the ratio of signal intensity of Aurora-A to that of S26 measured by 1D Image Analysis software (Kodak Digital Science, Rochester, NY) and scored as high (ratio >1.0) or low (ratio <1.0). The Aurora-A mRNA level of nontumorous liver rarely exceeded a ratio of 1.0.

For the determination of p21 and Bax levels in Aurora-A-overexpressed cells, total RNA was extracted from Aurora-A or empty vector-transfected cells and analyzed for p21 and Bax expression by RT-PCR. The primers used were p21-F (cggcctggcacctcacct), p21-R (cctctcattcaaccgcctag), Bax-F (tcatccaggatcgagcaggg), and Bax-R (ccagatggtgagtgaggcgg). PCR was performed using Touch Down program and stopped at the exponential phase of the amplified genes, 28 cycles for both genes.

Cell Culture.

All of the cell lines used in this study were maintained in DMEM plus 10% FCS supplemented with penicillin and streptomycin.

Western Blot Hybridization.

To determine the expression levels of Aurora-A in liver cancer cell lines, ∼5 × 106 cells were taken up in 50 μl of loading buffer and boiled for 5 min. After a 30-s vortexing step to shear the genomic DNA, 30 μl of this extract was electrophoresed through SDS-10% polyacrylamide gels. After transfer to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, the proteins were detected with anti-Aurora-A antibody (1:1000; Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA), followed by horseradish peroxide-conjugated secondary antibody and chemiluminescence reagents (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ). The same membrane was reprobed with anti-β-actin (1:2000; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) as a control for equivalent protein loading.

Immunofluorescence Staining.

Cells on 18-mm coverslips were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min. Fixed cells were blocked in PBS/5% FCS/0.1% Triton X-100 and subsequently incubated for 2 h in primary antibodies (Aurora-A, 1:250; γ-tubulin, 1:200; Sigma). Cells were washed repeatedly in PBS/0.1% Triton X-100 and incubated for 45 min with a secondary antibody diluted 1:500 in same antibody buffer. Nuclei were counterstained with 0.5 μg/ml 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole for 10 min and washed in PBS.

Cloning and Transfection.

The full-length Aurora-A was kindly provided by Dr. Tang K. Tang (Institute of Biomedical Science, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan). Aurora-A-pCMV-Tag2B was constructed by cloning into the BamHI-XhoI site of pCMV-Tag2B. Using LipofectAMINE (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, HEK 293 cells were transiently transfected with Aurora-A-pCMV-Tag2B or empty vector.

Southern Hybridization.

Genomic DNA samples (5–15 μg) of HCC and nontumorous liver tissues were isolated using the phenol-chloroform method, digested with BglII, HindIII, or EcoRI (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD), subjected to electrophoresis on a 0.8% agarose, and transferred to Zeta-probe nylon membrane (Bio-Rad Labs, Richmond, CA), as described (31) .To avoid cross-hybridization of Aurora-A pseudogene, an Aurora-A intron 2 probe was used. The membrane was hybridized with 32P-labeled probe, washed, dried, and autoradiographed at −70°C with X-Omat AR film (Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY). The membranes were rehybridized with a β-globin probe as a control.

Analysis of p53 and β-Catenin Mutations.

Mutations of the p53 tumor suppressor gene and β-catenin gene were detected by direct sequencing of exon 2 to exon 11 of p53 and exon 3 of β-catenin as described previously (26 , 32) . Cases with incomplete study were excluded from statistical analysis.

Follow-Up Observation.

During the follow-up period up to 175 months, 178 patients (79%) had been followed for >10 years or until death. At the end of follow-up, 60 patients remained alive, 14 of whom had survived for >10 years.

Statitical Analysis.

The analyses were performed using the Statistica for Windows software (Statsoft, Inc., Chicago, IL). Two-tailed χ2 was used for univariate analysis. The cumulative survival after tumor removal was calculated with the log-rank test. Ps < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Expression of Aurora-A in HCC, Liver, and Liver Cancer Cell Lines.

We used RT-PCR for large-scale analysis of Aurora-A mRNA expression in HCC. Among 224 unifocal primary HCCs, Aurora-A was overexpressed in 137 tumors (61%; Fig. 1⇓ ). Of these 224 HCCs, RNA samples of nontumorous liver parenchyma were available for 199 patients. In the nontumorous liver, Aurora-A mRNA was overexpressed in 10 cases (5%). Aurora-A was overexpressed in all 8 of the liver cancer cell lines at the mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 2)⇓ . The protein expression level of Aurora-A in the liver cancer cell lines was parallel with the mRNA expression level, indicating that the expression of Aurora-A is regulated at transcription level, and mRNA level can represent the protein expression level.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Aurora-A mRNA expression in paired hepatocellular carcinoma (T) and nontumorous liver parenchyma (N). Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR measurement of Aurora-A mRNA during the exponential phase of reverse transcription-PCR amplification of mRNA showed Aurora-A overexpression in 5 of 6 hepatocellular carcinoma specimens.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Overexpression of Aurora-A in liver cancer cell lines. Protein lysates from nontumorous liver tissue and 8 liver cancers cell lined were analyzed by immunoblotting. All 8 liver cancer cell lines show overexpression of Aurora-A at protein level (top panel). The blots were reprobed with β-actin as a control for protein loading. The protein expression levels were correlated with mRNA level (bottom panel).

To determine the subcellular localization of Aurora-A in HCC, immunofluorescent staining was performed on Hep3B cell lines. Aurora-A colocalized with γ-tubulin at centrosome at interface and at centrosome, and mitotic spindle at metaphase (Fig. 3)⇓ , as was reported in other cells (11) .

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Localization of Aurora-A at interphase and metaphase Hep3B cell lines. A, Aurora-A was visualized with anti-aurora-A antibody and Rhodamine-conjugated secondary antibody (red). DNA was labeled with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole staining (blue). Aurora-A shows perinuclear dot-like staining in interphase cells and located at mitotic spindle in metaphase cells. B, γ-tubulin, a marker of centrosome, was stained with anti-γ-tubulin antibody and FITC-conjugated secondary antibody. C, merge of A and B. Aurora-A and γ-tubulin colocalized at centrosome and mitotic spindle.

Clinicopathologic Correlation of Aurora-A Expression in HCC.

To elucidate the role of Aurora-A in HCC, we correlated the Aurora-A expression with clinicopathologic features of HCC. As shown in Table 1⇓ , Aurora-A overexpression in HCC did not correlate with age, gender, and chronic hepatitis B virus infection, but was associated with serum α-fetoprotein elevation (P = 0.031).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Aurora-A mRNA expression status in relation to selected clinicopathologic features in 224 patients with resected unifocal primary hepatocellular carcinoma

Histologically, HCCs with Aurora-A overexpression were more frequently grade II-IV than those without Aurora-A overexpression (P < 0.0001). Aurora-A overexpression was associated with portal vein tumor invasion (stage IIIB and IV HCC; P = 0.025), regardless of tumor size.

HCCs with Aurora-A overexpression was associated with a significantly lower 10-year survival rate than HCCs without Aurora-A overexpression (P < 0.007; Fig. 4⇓ ).

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Cumulative survival curve for 224 patients with primary unifocal hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). HCC with Aurora-A mRNA overexpression, designated Aurora-A (+), had a significantly worse 10-year survival rate than HCC without Aurora-A mRNA overexpression, designated Aurora-A (−).

Correlation and Synergy between Aurora-A Expression, and p53 and β-Catenin Mutations.

p53 and β-catenin are the two most frequently mutated genes in HCC (26 , 32) . To identify the potential interplay between these oncogenic events, we analyzed the relation of mutations of these two genes and Aurora-A overexpression. In this study, p53 mutation was found in 88 (49%) of 178 HCCs examined. Overexpression of Aurora-A correlated with p53 mutation (P = 0.04; Table 1⇓ ). Moreover, HCCs with Aurora-A overexpression and p53 mutation had the worst survival than those with p53 mutation or Aurora-A overexpression alone (Fig. 5)⇓ .

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Cumulative survival curve for 178 patients with primary unifocal hepatocellular carcinoma in relation to increased (+) or normal (−) expression of Aurora-A and the presence (+) or absence of p53 mutation. Hepatocellular carcinoma with Aurora-A overexpression and p53 mutation had the worst survival rate.

Mutations of exon 3 of β-catenin were identified in 32 (15%) of 214 HCCs examined. In contrast to the association of Aurora-A overexpression with p53 mutation, Aurora-A was more frequently overexpressed in HCCs without β-catenin mutation (P = 0.024).

Aurora-A Overexpression and p53 Target Genes.

Because Aurora-A overexpression was closely correlated with p53 mutation and Aurora-A was known to interact directly with p53 (33) , we then analyzed the effects of Aurora-A on p53 target genes. RT-PCR analysis of Aurora-A-overexpressed HEK 293 cells demonstrated that Aurora-A did not significantly alter the transcriptional level of p21 and Bax (Fig. 6)⇓ .

Fig. 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Overexpression of Aurora-A into HEK 293 cells did not affect the expression level of p53 target genes p21 and Bax.

Amplification of Aurora-A in HCC.

Southern blot analysis demonstrated amplification of Aurora-A only in 3 of 99 tumors (3%; Fig. 7⇓ ). Overexpression of Aurora-A was detected in all of these tumors.

Fig. 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 7.

Southern blot hybridization demonstrated amplification of Aurora-A in 3 tumors (T, tumor; N, nontumorous liver parenchyma). β-Globin served as a control for DNA quantity.

DISCUSSION

Genetic instability, by generating mutations in oncogenes and tumor-suppressor genes, provide cancer cells with a selective growth advantage, thereby leading to clonal outgrowth, and, hence, is a major driving force for malignant transformation and tumor progression (34, 35, 36) . Two forms of genetic instability have been described in cancers, chromosomal instability and microsatellite instability (37) . Microsatellite instability involves the inactivation of DNA mismatch repair genes and is present in only a minor subset of tumors. Chromosomal instability is much more frequent in cancer, but its mechanism is poorly understood. Inactivation of mitotic spindle checkpoint genes, such as BUB and MAD2, have been implicated in aneuploidy formation, but BUB mutation and MAD2 down-regulation can only be detected in a small fraction of aneuploidy cancer (38 , 39) . Amplification and overexpression of Aurora-A are more frequent in human cancer (17, 18, 19, 20, 21 ,, 40 , 41) . By causing centrosome abnormalities and chromosomal instability, overexpression of Aurora-A can promote tumor formation and progression (17)

To study the role of Aurora-A in HCC, we analyzed its expression level in 224 cases, and detected overexpression of Aurora-A in 61% of the cases. Aurora-A overexpression was more frequently associated with higher grade, higher stage, and worse 10-year survival. Pervious studies indicated that most cancers with aneuploidy show a more malignant phenotype than diploid cancers (42 , 43) . These observations suggest that overexpression of Aurora-A, by causing chromosomal instability, may contribute to a more malignant phenotype of HCC.

Inactivation of p53 results in centrosome hyperamplification, leading to aberrant mitosis and chromosomal instability (44 , 45) . The p53 protein interacts directly with Aurora-A, and suppresses Aurora-A-induced centrosome amplification and cellular transformation in a transactivation-independent manner (33) . Centrosome amplification and aneuploidy induced by Aurora-A overexpression are exacerbated in a p53−/− background (46) . In this study, we found that Aurora-A overexpression was correlated with p53 mutation in HCC, and tumors with both Aurora-A overexpression and p53 mutation had worse prognosis than p53 mutation alone, but Aurora-A overexpression did not significant affect the expression level of p53 target genes. These observations provide in vivo evidence that Aurora-A and p53 had a synergistic effect contributing toward tumor progression and, hence, poor prognosis.

We also showed that Aurora-A overexpression was negatively associated with β-catenin mutation. In previous study, we showed that β-catenin mutation in HCC was associated with lower grade, lower stage, and better 5-year survival (26) . Laurent-Puig et al. (47) classified HCC into two groups. One is characterized by chromosome stability, β-catenin mutation, and chromosome 8p loss. The other is characterized by chromosomal instability, Axin 1, and p53 mutation. The negative association of Aurora-A overexpression with β-catenin mutation and positive association with p53 mutation suggest that Aurora-A overexpression is associated with the latter group and may account for the genomic instability in these tumors.

Amplification of Aurora-A was detected in only 3% of HCCs examined. Although Aurora-A amplification coincided with overexpression, many more cases showed Aurora-A overexpression without amplification. Thus, the expression of Aurora-A is likely to be regulated not only by gene amplification but also by other mechanisms such as transcriptional activation. Another possibility is that Aurora-A gene amplification occurred in only a proportion of the tumor cells and is undetectable by Southern blot analysis. Discrepancy between amplification and overexpression rates has also been reported in gastric cancer (39) , bladder cancer (21) , and pancreatic cancer (40) , indicating that transcriptional activation may be a major cause of Aurora-A overexpression in human cancers.

In summary, we have demonstrated that Aurora-A is highly expressed in HCC. Overexpression of Aurora-A may have important pathogenetic and prognostic significance in HCC.

Footnotes

  • Grant support: National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH-92-S28) and National Health Research Institute, Taiwan (NHRI-GT-EX89B701L)

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • Requests for reprints: Hey-Chi Hsu, Department of Pathology, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei 100, Taiwan. Phone: 886-2-23123456, extension 5455; Fax: 886-2-23934172; E-mail: heychi{at}ha.mc.ntu.edu.tw

  • Received July 17, 2003.
  • Revision received December 10, 2003.
  • Accepted December 10, 2003.

References

  1. ↵
    Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B Cancer-susceptibility genes. Gatekeepers and caretakers. Nature, 386: 761-3, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B Genetic instabilities in human cancers. Nature, 396: 643-9, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Barlogie B, Raber MN, Schumann J, et al Flow cytometry in clinical cancer research. Cancer Res, 43: 3982-97, 1983.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Shih IM, Zhou W, Goodman SN, Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B Evidence that genetic instability occurs at an early stage of colorectal tumorigenesis. Cancer Res, 61: 818-22, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Zimmerman W, Sparks CA, Doxsey SJ Amorphous no longer: the centrosome comes into focus. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 11: 122-8, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Carroll PE, Okuda M, Horn HF, et al Centrosome hyperamplification in human cancer: chromosome instability induced by p53 mutation and/or Mdm2 overexpression. Oncogene, 18: 1935-44, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Pihan GA, Purohit A, Wallace J, et al Centrosome defects and genetic instability in malignant tumors. Cancer Res, 58: 3974-85, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Brinkley BR Managing the centrosome numbers game: from chaos to stability in cancer cell division. Trends Cell Biol, 11: 18-21, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Francisco L, Wang W, Chan CS Type 1 protein phosphatase acts in opposition to IpL1 protein kinase in regulating yeast chromosome segregation. Mol Cell Biol, 14: 4731-40, 1994.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Glover DM, Leibowitz MH, McLean DA, Parry H Mutations in aurora prevent centrosome separation leading to the formation of monopolar spindles. Cell, 81: 95-105, 1995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Katayama H, Brinkley WR, Sen S The aurora kinases: role in cell transformation and tumorigenesis Kumar R eds. . Cancer and metastasis reviews, Vol. 22: p. 451-64, Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht, The Netherlands 2003.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    Nigg EA Mitotic kinases as regulators of cell division and its checkpoints. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2: 21-32, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Jazaeri AA, Lu K, Schmandt R, et al Molecular determinants of tumor differentiation in papillary serous ovarian carcinoma. Mol Carcinog, 36: 53-9, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Forozan F, Mahlamaki EH, Monni O, et al Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of 38 breast cancer cell lines: a basis for interpreting complementary DNA microarray data. Cancer Res, 60: 4519-25, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Schlegel J, Stumm G, Scherthan H, et al Comparative genomic in situ hybridization of colon carcinomas with replication error. Cancer Res, 55: 6002-5, 1995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Reznikoff CA, Belair CD, Yeager TR, et al A molecular genetic model of human bladder cancer pathogenesis. Semin Oncol, 23: 571-84, 1996.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    Zhou H, Kuang J, Zhong L, et al Tumour amplified kinase STK15/BTAK induces centrosome amplification, aneuploidy and transformation. Nat Genet, 20: 189-93, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Tanaka T, Kimura M, Matsunaga K, Fukada D, Mori H, Okano Y Centrosomal kinase AIK1 is overexpressed in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Cancer Res, 59: 2041-4, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Bischoff JR, Anderson L, Zhu Y, et al A homologue of Drosophila aurora kinase is oncogenic and amplified in human colorectal cancers. EMBO J, 17: 3052-65, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  20. ↵
    Gritsko TM, Coppola D, Paciga JE, et al Activation and overexpression of centrosome kinase BTAK/Aurora-A in human ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res, 9: 1420-6, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Sen S, Zhou H, Zhang RD, et al Amplification/ overexpression of a mitotic kinase gene in human bladder cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst, 94: 1320-9, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    El-Serag HB Hepatocellular carcinoma: an epidemiologic view. J Clin Gastroenterol, 35: S72-8, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Kim GJ, Cho SJ, Won NH, et al Genomic imbalances in Korean hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet, 142: 129-33, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Niketeghad F, Decker HJ, Caselmann WH, et al Frequent genomic imbalances suggest commonly altered tumour genes in human hepatocarcinogenesis. Br J Cancer, 85: 697-704, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Collonge-Rame MA, Bresson-Hadni S, Koch S, et al Pattern of chromosomal imbalances in non-B virus related hepatocellular carcinoma detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet, 127: 49-52, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Hsu HC, Jeng YM, Mao TL, Chu JS, Lai PL, Peng SY β-Catenin mutations are associated with a subset of low-stage hepatocellular carcinoma negative for hepatitis B virus and with favorable prognosis. Am J Pathol, 157: 763-70, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Peng SY, Lai PL, Chu JS, et al Expression and hypomethylation of α-fetoprotein gene in unicentric and multicentric human hepatocellular carcinomas. Hepatology, 17: 35-41, 1993.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Hsu HC, Chiou TJ, Chen JY, Lee CS, Lee PH, Peng SY Clonality and clonal evolution of hepatocellular carcinoma with multiple nodules. Hepatology, 13: 923-8, 1991.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Liu SH, Lin CY, Peng SY, et al Down-regulation of annexin A10 in hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with vascular invasion, early recurrence, and poor prognosis in synergy with p53 mutation. Am J Pathol, 160: 1831-7, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Vincent S, Marty L, Fort P S26 ribosomal protein RNA: an invariant control for gene regulation experiments in eucaryotic cells and tissues. Nucleic Acids Res, 21: 1498 1993.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Southern E Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J Mol Biol, 98: 503-17, 1975.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Hsu HC, Huang AM, Lai PL, Chien WM, Peng SY, Lin SW Genetic alterations at the splice junction of p53 gene in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology, 19: 122-8, 1994.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Chen SS, Chang PC, Cheng YW, Tang FM, Lin YS Suppression of the STK15 oncogenic activity requires a transactivation-independent p53 function. EMBO J, 21: 4491-9, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  34. ↵
    Cahill DP, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Lengauer C Genetic instability and darwinian selection in tumours. Trends Cell Biol, 9: M57-60, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    Pihan GA, Doxsey SJ The mitotic machinery as a source of genetic instability in cancer. Semin Cancer Biol, 9: 289-302, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B Genetic instabilities in human cancers. Nature, 396: 643-9, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    Boland CR, Sato J, Saito K, et al Genetic instability and chromosomal aberrations in colorectal cancer: a review of the current models. Cancer Detect. Prev, 22: 377-82, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    Cahill DP, Lengauer C, Yu J, et al Mutations of mitotic checkpoint genes in human cancers. Nature, 392: 300-3, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Li Y, Benezra R Identification of a human mitotic checkpoint gene: hsMAD2. Science, 274: 246-8, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    Sakakura C, Hagiwara A, Yasuoka R, et al Tumour-amplified kinase BTAK is amplified and overexpressed in gastric cancers with possible involvement in aneuploidy. Br J Cancer, 84: 824-31, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Li D, Zhu J, Firozi PF, et al Overexpression of oncogenic STK15/BTAK/Aurora A kinase in human pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res, 9: 991-7, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    Oriyama T, Yamanaka N, Fujimoto J, Ichikawa N, Okamoto E Progression of hepatocellular carcinoma as reflected by nuclear DNA ploidy and cellular differentiation. J Hepatol, 28: 142-9, 1998.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  43. ↵
    Ng IO, Lai EC, Ho JC, Cheung LK, Ng MM, So MK Flow cytometric analysis of DNA ploidy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol, 102: 80-6, 1994.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  44. ↵
    Tarapore P, Fukasawa K Loss of p53 and centrosome hyperamplification. Oncogene, 21: 6234-40, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    Carroll PE, Okuda M, Horn HF, et al Centrosome hyperamplification in human cancer: chromosome instability induced by p53 mutation and/or Mdm2 overexpression. Oncogene, 18: 1935-44, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    Meraldi P, Honda R, Nigg EA Aurora-A overexpression reveals tetraploidization as a major route to centrosome amplification in p53−/− cells. EMBO J, 21: 483-92, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  47. ↵
    Laurent-Puig P, Legoix P, Bluteau O, et al Genetic alterations associated with hepatocellular carcinomas define distinct pathways of hepatocarcinogenesis. Gastroenterology, 120: 1763-73, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Clinical Cancer Research: 10 (6)
March 2004
Volume 10, Issue 6
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Clinical Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Overexpression and Amplification of Aurora-A in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Overexpression and Amplification of Aurora-A in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Yung-Ming Jeng, Shian-Yang Peng, Chiao-Ying Lin and Hey-Chi Hsu
Clin Cancer Res March 15 2004 (10) (6) 2065-2071; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-1057-03

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Overexpression and Amplification of Aurora-A in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Yung-Ming Jeng, Shian-Yang Peng, Chiao-Ying Lin and Hey-Chi Hsu
Clin Cancer Res March 15 2004 (10) (6) 2065-2071; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-1057-03
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Regular Articles

  • Induction of Apoptosis by Flavopiridol in Human Neuroblastoma Cells Is Enhanced under Hypoxia and Associated With N-myc Proto-oncogene Down-Regulation
  • Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Human Reovirus Type 3 in Immunocompetent Animals
  • Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Does Not Improve Paclitaxel Effect in an Orthotopic Mouse Model of Lung Cancer
Show more Regular Articles

Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates

  • Prognostic Impact of Hypoxia-Inducible Factors 1α and 2α in Colorectal Cancer Patients
  • Loss of Heterozygosity and Immunohistochemistry of Adenocarcinomas of the Esophagus and Gastric Cardia
  • OCT4
Show more Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • CCR Focus Archive
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Clinical Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Clinical Cancer Research
eISSN: 1557-3265
ISSN: 1078-0432

Advertisement