Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • OnlineFirst
    • Editors' Picks
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • OnlineFirst
    • Editors' Picks
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
Cancer Therapy: Preclinical

Targeting the c-Met Pathway Potentiates Glioblastoma Responses to γ-Radiation

Bachchu Lal, Shuli Xia, Roger Abounader and John Laterra
Bachchu Lal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shuli Xia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roger Abounader
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Laterra
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0166 Published June 2005
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Purpose: Resistance to current cytotoxic therapies limits the treatment of most solid malignancies. This results, in part, from the overactivation of receptor tyrosine kinases and their downstream pathways in tumor cells and their associated vasculature. In this report, we ask if targeting the multifunctional mitogenic, cytoprotective, and angiogenic scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor (SF/HGF)/c-Met pathway potentiates antitumor responses to γ-radiation.

Experimental Design: Endogenous expression of SF/HGF and c-Met was targeted in U87 MG human malignant glioma cells and xenografts using chimeric U1/ribozymes. The effects of U1/ribozymes ± γ-radiation on glioma cell proliferation, apoptosis, xenograft growth, and animal survival were examined.

Results: U1/ribozymes knocked down SF/HGF and c-Met mRNA and protein levels, sensitized cells to γ-radiation (P < 0.005), and enhanced radiation-induced caspase-dependent cytotoxicity in vitro (P < 0.005). Intravenous U1/ribozyme therapy as liposome/DNA complexes or radiation alone modestly and transiently inhibited the growth of s.c. U87 xenografts. Combining the therapies caused tumor regression and a 40% tumor cure rate. In animals bearing intracranial xenografts, long-term survival was 0% in response to radiation, 20% in response to intratumoral adenoviral-based U1/ribozyme delivery, and 80% (P < 0.0005) in response to combining U1/ribozymes with radiation. This apparent synergistic antitumor response was associated with a ∼70% decrease in cell proliferation (P < 0.001) and a ∼14- to 40-fold increase in apoptosis (P < 0.0001) within xenografts.

Conclusions: Targeting the SF/HGF/c-Met pathway markedly potentiates the antiglioma response to γ-radiation. Clinical trials using novel SF/HGF/c-Met pathway inhibitors in glioma and other malignancies associated with c-Met activation should ultimate include concurrent radiation and potentially other cytotoxic therapeutics.

  • scatter factor
  • hepatocyte growth factor
  • brain tumor
  • apoptosis

Expression of the transmembraneous receptor tyrosine kinase c-Met and its secreted ligand scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor (SF/HGF) is associated with malignant progression and poor survival in glioma and many other solid malignancies (1–5). SF/HGF and c-Met are increasingly seen as promising therapeutic targets due to these clinical associations and to their multifunctional autocrine and paracrine tumor-promoting activities. c-Met activation by tumor-derived SF/HGF stimulates tumor cell migration/invasion, proliferation, and resistance to various cytotoxic stimuli (3, 6, 7). SF/HGF is also a potent physiologic and tumor-associated endothelial cell survival factor and angiogenic factor (8, 9) that correlates with tumor angiogenesis and potentiates the angiogenic effects of other angiogenic factors (10, 11).

SF/HGF inhibits apoptotic mechanisms and enhances cell survival in various normal and malignant cell types and in multiple contexts. In Madin-Darby canine kidney cell epithelial cells, SF/HGF inhibits apoptosis induced by detachment (12) and a constitutively activated truncated c-Met renders normal hepatocytes resistant to apoptotic cell death (13). We recently found that SF/HGF protects neonatal cerebellar granule cells from excitotoxic death (14). In malignant cell lines such as mammary carcinoma and malignant glioma, we found that SF/HGF protects against death induced by a variety of DNA damaging agents, including the topoisomerase inhibitors Adriamycin and camptothecin and ionizing radiation both in vitro and in vivo (15–17). Whereas the bulk of evidence points to predominantly cytoprotective and antiapoptotic effects of c-Met activation, other studies have found that c-Met promotes apoptosis in certain sarcoma and hepatoma cell lines (18, 19). Recently, Tulasne et al. found that the c-Met tyrosine kinase can induce epithelial cell apoptosis in a SF/HGF-independent manner in response to in vitro cell stress (20).

We have used gain-of-function and loss-of-function approaches to determine how endogenous SF/HGF/c-Met signaling contributes to glioma malignancy. SF/HGF gene transfer to experimental rat and human glioma enhances tumorigenicity, tumor growth rates, and tumor-associated angiogenesis (9, 21). Stable and near-complete knockdown of endogenous SF/HGF or c-Met gene expression potently inhibits the tumorigenicity of malignant glioma cells that express autocrine/paracrine SF/HGF/c-Met loops, a characteristic of the majority of human malignant gliomas (22). Delivering anti-SF/HGF and anti-Met U1/ribozymes to preestablished glioma xenografts has produced statistically and biologically significant tumor growth inhibition of a more modest degree (23). In these previous studies, targeting the SF/HGF/c-Met pathway in glioma xenografts had antiangiogenic and proapoptotic effects suggesting that targeting this pathway would enhance antiglioma responses to traditional cytotoxic treatment modalities.

In this present study, we show that targeting the SF/HGF/c-Met pathway in vivo substantially enhances the response of preestablished human glioma xenografts to relatively low doses of hypofractionated γ-radiation. Furthermore, we show that the apparent synergistic antitumor response occurs through multiple mechanisms including glioma cell growth arrest and activation of glioma cell apoptosis pathways. Our preclinical findings establish a basis for combining strategies that target the SF/HGF/c-Met pathway with γ-radiation in the treatment of malignant glioma and possibly other cancers associated with c-Met pathway activation.

Materials and Methods

U1/ribozymes and expression vectors. Anti-SF/HGF and anti-c-Met U1snRNA/ribozyme/antisense chimeric transgenes (U1/ribozymes) and their expression vectors were synthesized and extensively characterized as previously described (22, 23). Endotoxin-free anti-SF/HGF, anti-Met, and control U1/ribozyme expression plasmids (designated pU1/SF, pU1/Met, or pU1/control, respectively) were complexed with liposomes containing the cationic lipid DOTIM (1-[2-[9(Z)-octadecenoy]-ethyl][-2-]([8](Z)-heptadecenyl]-3-[hydroxyethyl]imidazolinium chloride) and cholesterol (kindly provided by Dr. Gary Koe, Valentis, Inc., Burlingame, CA) for i.v. delivery to animals bearing s.c. tumors as previously described (23). Replication-defective adenoviruses expressing anti-SF/HGF and anti-Met U1/ribozymes or control U1 sequences (designated Ad-U1/SF and Ad-U1/Met and Ad-U1/control, respectively) were constructed and produced as previously described (23). Viral preparations purified by ultracentrifugation and dialysis and titered by plaque forming assays at ∼1012 plaque-forming unit/mL were kindly provided by Dr. Andrea Gambotto (NHL Vector Core Facility, Human Gene Therapy Center, University of Pittsburgh).

Northern hybridization and immunoblottting. U87 MG human malignant glioma cells were cultured in Eagle's MEM (Cellgro Mediatech, Washington, DC) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Cellgro Mediatech), 0.15% sodium bicarbonate (Life Technologies, Rockville, MD), 1 mmol/L sodium pyruvate (Life Technologies), 0.1 mol/L nonessential amino acids (Life Technologies), and 500 μg/mL penicillin-streptomycin (Life Technologies) at 37°C, 5% CO2/95% air. Subconfluent cell monolayers received Ad-U1 control, Ad-U1/SF, or Ad-U1/Met (∼100 multiplicity of infection). Approximately 48 hours later, cells were harvested and total cellular RNA was purified as previously described (22). Northern analysis using 32P-labeled cDNA probes specific for either human SF/HGF, human c-Met, or glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase was done as previously described (22). For analysis of SF/HGF and c-Met protein, cells received adenovirus twice 24 hours apart and total protein was isolated in the presence of protease inhibitors 48 hours later. Western immunoblot analysis of total cellular protein (30 μg per lane) using anti-SF/HGF and anti-c-Met antibodies (Santa Cruz, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA) was done as previously described (22, 23).

In vitro cell viability. U87 MG glioblastoma cells were seeded at a density of 2,000 cells per well in 12-well tissue culture plates. After 24 hours, adherent cells were treated twice at 24 hours intervals with either Ad-U1/control or Ad-U1/ribozyme (∼100 multiplicity of infection). At 72 hours following the first adenoviral treatment, cells were subjected to 20 Gy γ-radiation (radiation source = 132Cesium GammaCell Irradiator; Atomic Energy of Canada, Ltd., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) or mock irradiated. In a subset of experiments, cultures received the caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) to a final concentration of 50 μmol/L (or buffer only as control) 30 minutes before the first adenoviral vector treatment and again 30 minutes before radiation treatment. At the times indicated, adherent cells were suspended by trypsinization and counted using a Beckman Coulter Counter (Fullerton, CA). Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase–mediated nick-end labeling (TUNEL) immunocytochemistry was done on the pooled populations of adherent and floating cells as previously described (15).

Tumor implantation and animal treatments. For s.c. tumors, U87 MG cells (4 × 106 per animal) were implanted in the flanks of athymic nude mice (n = 10). When the tumors reached a size of ∼25 mm3, the animals began treatment with liposomes complexed with pU1/SF + pU1/Met ribozymes (1:1 mixture) or pU1/control (30 μg total DNA in 100 μL) with or without radiation (300 cGy/dose) delivered by a 132Cesium irradiator. Liposome/DNA complexes were delivered by tail vein injection on days 5, 15, and 25 following tumor implantation as previously described (23). Tumors were irradiated on days 7, 12, 17, 22, and 27 following tumor implantation. Tumor sizes were measured every 5 days with calipers and volumes were calculated using the formula: volume = (length × width2) / 2 (9). Animals were sacrificed if tumor volume reached ∼200 mm3. For intracranial tumors, SCID/beige mice were implanted with transcranial cannulae (Plastics One, Inc., Roanoke, VA) with the proximal end within right caudate/putamen. Cannulae were used for tumor implantation and adenovirus delivery to insure precise and replicable delivery of adenoviruses directly into the tumors (24). U87 MG cells (1 × 105 per animal) were implanted (n = 20) 7 days after cannulae placement. The animals subsequently received intratumoral injections of Ad-U1/SF + Ad-U1/Met (1:1 mixture) or Ad-U1/control (5 × 107 plaque-forming unit in 5 μL) with or without radiation (300 cGy/dose). Adenoviruses were delivered on days 5 and 15 and radiation on days 8, 12, and 18 following tumor cell implantation. Ten mice from each treatment group were sacrificed on day 21 and brains were removed for histologic studies. The remaining 10 mice per group were monitored for survival.

Histology and immunohistochemistry. Tumor volumes were quantified by measuring tumor cross-sectional areas on 20-μm-thick H&E-stained cryostat sections from perfusion-fixed brains using computer assisted image analysis as previously described (9). Tumor cell proliferation was assessed by Ki-67 immunohistochemistry. TUNEL immunohistochemistry was done with the colorimetric TUNEL assay system (Promega, Madison, WI) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Activated caspase-3 and Ki-67 immunohistochemistry was conducted using anti-cleaved caspase-3 (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA) and anti MIB-1 antibodies (Dako Corp., Carpinteria, CA), respectively, as previously described (22, 23). Apoptotic and cell proliferation indices were determined by computer assisted quantification of the number of positively stained cells per microscopic field as previously described (22, 23).

Statistical analysis. Comparisons were analyzed using ANOVA followed by a post hoc Fisher's PLSD test for histopathologic end points and Bonferoni-Dunn for in vitro cell culture end points. Survival studies were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier.

Results

Scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor and c-Met expression inhibition potentiates glioma cell radiation injury in vitro. U87 MG malignant glioma cells were treated with replication-defective adenoviral vectors coding for anti-SF/HGF or anti-Met U1/ribozymes, or with U1 lacking the antisense/ribozyme sequences as control. As shown previously (23), adenoviral vector-based delivery of anti-SF/HGF and anti-Met U1/ribozymes substantially and specifically reduced SF/HGF and c-Met mRNA levels by ∼80% to 95% (Fig. 1A). Cell-associated SF/HGF protein levels were also inhibited by ∼80% in cells treated with anti-SF/HGF U1/ribozymes (Fig. 1B). Treatment with anti-Met U1/ribozyme reduced cell-associated c-Met protein levels by 50% to 60%, consistent with the relatively longer half-life of this transmembraneous receptor in comparison with its secreted ligand (Fig. 1B).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Chimeric U1/ribozymes inhibit glioma cell expression of SF/HGF and c-Met. U87 MG human glioblastoma cells were treated with replication-defective adenovirus coding for anti-SF/HGF U1/ribozyme (Ad-U1/SF), anti-Met U1/ribozyme (Ad-U1/Met), or control (Ad-U1). Total cellular RNA and protein were isolated and subjected to Northern and Western analyses, respectively, using specific cDNA probes and antibodies for human SF/HGF and c-Met as described in Materials and Methods. Densitometric analyses (data not shown) show that U1/ribozymes reduced cell levels of the targeted mRNA by ∼80% to 95% relative to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). SF/HGF and c-Met proteins were reduced by ∼80% and ∼50% to 60%, respectively.

We examined the effects of SF/HGF and c-Met expression knockdown on the response of U87 MG cells to γ-radiation (Fig. 2). Cultures were pretreated with either Ad-U1/control or active Ad-U1/ribozymes (1:1 mixture of anti-SF/HGF and anti-Met U1/ribozymes) on culture days 1 and 2 followed by either γ-radiation (20 Gy) or mock radiation as shown in Fig. 2A. As shown in Fig. 2B, cells were statistically significantly more sensitive to γ-radiation following SF/HGF and c-Met expression knock down when compared with controls as evidenced by the number of viable adherent cells remaining 96 hours after radiation relative to the number of cells immediately before radiation (43% versus 84%, respectively; P < 0.005). These quantitative data was supported by the appearance of substantially more floating cells following radiation in the U1/ribozyme-treated cultures (data not shown). TUNEL analysis showed statistically significantly more apoptotic cell death in cultures treated with both U1/ribozymes and radiation than in cultures treated with either modality alone (P < 0.001; Fig. 2C). Pretreating cells with the pan-caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK resulted in 3- to 4-fold more cytoprotection (P < 0.005) in cells treated with U1/ribozymes + radiation injury in comparison with cells treated with either U1/ribozymes alone or radiation alone (Fig. 2D). These results show that U1/ribozyme-based targeting of the endogenous autocrine SF/HGF/c-Met pathway sensitizes U87 MG glioma cells to radiation cytotoxicity and apoptosis and synergistically activates radiation-induced caspase-dependent cell death.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

A, growth curve of U87 MG cells treated with Ad-U1/control (-▪-), Ad-U1/ribozyme (1:1 mix of anti-SF/HGF and anti-Met Ad-U1/ribozymes; - ▴-), Ad-U1/control plus radiation (-□-), and Ad-U1/ribozyme plus radiation (-▵-) as described in Materials and Methods. Cells were treated with viral vectors on days 1 and 2 and irradiated on day 4 (20 Gy). The adherent cells were counted daily. B, cells were treated as in (A); the number of adherent cells 24 to 96 hours after radiation was compared with that immediately before radiation. The percentage cell number relative to cell numbers before radiation (set at 100%) is shown. Radiation alone and Ad-U1/ribozyme alone induced a slight cell number loss by 96 hours (14% and 16%, respectively). Combining Ad-U1/ribozyme and radiation caused a substantially greater cell loss (57%) compared with either treatment alone, *, P < 0.005). C, cultures were treated as in (A) and the adherent and floating cells at day 8 were collected and subjected to TUNEL staining for detection of apoptosis. Percentage of TUNEL-positive cells in each treatment group above that measured in the Ad-U1/control group is shown. Combining Ad-U1/ribozymes with radiation generated significantly more TUNEL-positive cells than either treatment alone (*, P < 0.001). D, cells were treated with the caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK (50 μmol/L) or buffer prior to exposure to U1/ribozymes and radiation as described in Materials and Methods. The change in adherent cells between culture days 4 and 8 (i.e., following radiation) was determined for each experimental group. Z-VAD-FMK had a 4- to 5-fold greater cytoprotective effect on cells exposed to Ad-U1/ribozyme + radiation in comparison to cells exposed to either Ad-U1/ribozyme or radiation alone (*, P < 0.005). Mean increase in adherent cells measured 4 days after radiation in the presence of Z-VAD-FMK relative to control (i.e., no Z-VAD-FMK treatment) is shown for each experimental group. Experiments were repeated three times with representative results shown; bars, ± SE.

Systemic scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor and c-Met U1/ribozymes synergize with γ-radiation against s.c. glioma xenografts. We have previously shown that i.v. liposome-based U1/ribozyme delivery reduces the levels of both SF/HGF and c-Met mRNA in U87 glioma xenografts (22, 23). We used this same regimen to determine if targeting the SF/HGF/c-Met pathway with U1/ribozymes sensitizes glioma xenografts to γ-radiation in vivo, similar to that observed in vitro. Animals bearing preestablished s.c. U87 MG glioma xenografts underwent a treatment regimen consisting of i.v. injections of liposomes complexed with either control plasmid DNA (pU1/control) or plasmid DNA coding for anti-SF/HGF + anti-Met U1/ribozymes (1:1 mixture) interspersed with fractionated γ-irradiation (300 cGy/dose) or mock irradiation as described in the Materials and Methods and Fig. 3A. All therapy ended on post-implantation day 27. Tumor growth rates were inhibited in animals treated with either radiation alone or U1/ribozymes alone. Neither treatment alone stopped tumor growth or caused tumor regression. Tumor growth returned to control rates following a brief delay after the last dose of each of these single treatment modalities. In contrast, tumors in animals treated with both U1/ribozymes and radiation regressed with no evidence of tumor growth through post-glioma cell implantation day 46, 20 days following the last day of therapy. Furthermore, 40% of animals treated with both U1/ribozymes and radiation experienced complete tumor regression. These animals were euthanized on post-implantation day 60, autopsied, and examined carefully for tumor. None was found to have detectable tumor. Thus, combining radiation with U1/ribozyme therapy markedly enhanced the antitumor response in a highly cooperative and potentially synergistic fashion.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Anti-SF/HGF and anti-Met U1/ribozymes markedly enhance the antitumor response to γ-radiation in preestablished s.c. and intracranial glioblastoma xenografts. S.c. (A) and intracranial (B) human U87 MG glioblastoma xenografts (n = 10) were initiated on day 0 as described in Materials and Methods. Beginning on post-implantation day 5, animals received control expression vectors (U1/control) or active anti-SF/HGF + anti-c-Met U1/ribozymes (1:1 ratio) followed by either γ-radiation (300 cGy/dose) or mock irradiation (arrows) as described in Materials and Methods. A, s.c. tumor growth was quantified by serial caliper measurements. Animals without measurable subcutaneous tumor on post-implantation day 60 were sacrificed and subjected to autopsy. Those without histopathological evidence of tumor (40% of animals treated with the combination of U1/ribozyme + radiation) were designated cured. B, Kaplan Meier survival curves of animals bearing orthotopic intracranial tumor xenografts treated by direct intratumoral injection of Ad-U1/ribozymes ± radiation (arrows) as described in Materials and Methods. Statistically significant survival prolongation resulted from active U1/ribozymes alone (P < 0.03) and from the combination of U1/ribozymes + radiation (P < 0.0005).

Intratumoral scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor and c-Met U1/ribozymes synergize with γ-radiation to inhibit intracranial glioma growth and enhance long-term animal survival. We next asked if anti-SF/HGF and anti-Met U1/ribozymes would enhance the antitumor effects of γ-radiation in an orthotopic intracranial glioma. Intracranial glioma xenografts were established as described in Materials and Methods. Animals began treatment 5 days later with radiation, intratumoral adenoviruses expressing U1/ribozymes (anti-SF/HGF + anti-Met, 1:1 mixture), or a combination of both radiation and U1/ribozymes as described in Materials and Methods. Animal survival was monitored and Kaplan-Meier survival curves are shown in Fig. 3B. Treatment with either radiation or U1/ribozymes alone resulted in modest prolongations in median survival from 30 days in controls to 45 and 53 days in each monotherapy treatment group, respectively (P < 0.1 for radiation and P < 0.03 for U1/ribozymes compared with control). There were no long-term survivors in control animals or in animals treated only with radiation. U1/ribozyme therapy resulted in 20% long-term survival. Animals treated with both radiation and U1/ribozymes experienced a marked improvement in survival (P < 0.0005). Eighty percent of animals treated with this combination survived through post-implantation day 92 at which time all surviving animals were sacrificed for histopathologic examination. In addition, a subset of animals were sacrificed on post-implantation day 21 (3 days following completion of therapy) and their brains were subjected to histologic examination. Tumor sizes on post-implantation day 21 were consistent with the animal survival responses (Fig. 4A and B). There was a trend toward smaller tumors in response to radiation alone (P < 0.28). Tumors were modestly but statistically significantly smaller in response to U1/ribozyme monotherapy (P < 0.04) and markedly smaller in response to combination therapy (P < 0.01). None of the long-term survivors sacrificed at post-implantation day 92 was found by histologic examination to harbor active tumor (Fig. 4C).

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Histopathologic analysis of antitumor responses in animals bearing intracranial glioblastoma xenografts. Mice received U87 MG human glioblastoma cells by intracranial injection on day 0. Mice were then treated with Ad-U1/control or Ad-U1/ribozymes ± γ-radiation (300 cGy/dose) from post-implantation days 5 to 18 as described in Materials and Methods and in Fig. 3B. A and B, animals (n = 10) were sacrificed on post-implantation day 21 and tumors analyzed in 20-μm-thick H&E-stained brain sections. A, representative brain sections show tumors that are demarcated by arrows. Encephalomalacia adjacent to tumor resulted from withdrawal of the transcranial cannula during tissue processing. B, computer-assisted tumor size quantification. *, P < 0.01, compared with U1/control group. C, animals surviving beyond 90 days in the experiment shown in Fig. 3B were sacrificed on post-implantation day 92. Brain sections (20-μm-thick) from all animals were stained with H & E and examined for tumor. A representative animal treated with the combination of active U1/ribozymes and radiation reveals no evidence of surviving tumor.

Scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor/c-Met pathway targeting and γ-radiation cooperatively inhibit tumor cell proliferation and synergistically enhance tumor cell apoptosis. We show above that combining anti-SF/HGF and anti-Met U1/ribozymes with radiation causes glioma regression, durable antitumor responses, and a high percentage of long-term survivors. These in vivo antitumor responses suggested that targeting the SF/HGF/c-Met pathway in conjunction with radiation enhances tumor cell growth arrest and/or tumor cell death. To examine these possible mechanisms in more detail, animals bearing intracranial tumors were treated with either U1/ribozymes, radiation, or both as described above. Tumor cell proliferation was identified by anti-MIB1 (Ki-67) immunohistochemistry. The tumor proliferative index was not affected by radiation alone, was modestly reduced by ∼28% in response to U1/ribozyme monotherapy, and was more substantially reduced by ∼68% in response to combination therapy (Fig. 5). Thus, these two therapies cooperated to inhibit tumor cell proliferation.

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

SF/HGF/c-Met targeting potentiates the effect of γ-radiation on tumor cell proliferation inhibition. Mice received U87 MG cells by intracranial injection on day 0. They were then treated with control vectors or active U1/ribozymes ± radiation and sacrificed on post-implantation day 21 as described in Fig. 3B. Tumors were then examined for cell proliferation using Ki-67 immunohistochemistry as described in Materials and Methods (A). The number of labeled cells per high-powered microscopic field was quantified by computer-assisted image analysis. *, P < 0.0001 compared with Ad-U1/control. +, P < 0.001 compared with either Ad-U1/ribozyme or Ad-U1/ribozyme + radiation.

We also examined the effect of radiation alone, U1/ribozymes alone, and their combination on in vivo tumor cell apoptosis using TUNEL and anti-cleaved caspase-3 immunohistochemistry. Each treatment alone increased ∼3-fold the percentage of cells containing detectable activated cleaved caspase-3. Combining the two treatments increased this index of apoptosis activation by ∼40-fold (Fig. 6). Similar results were seen using TUNEL staining. Monotherapy with either radiation or U1/ribozyme therapy alone increased the percentage of TUNEL-positive tumor cells 2- and 3-fold, respectively. Combination therapy increased the TUNEL index 14-fold (Fig. 6). These findings are consistent with a synergistic activation of glioma cell apoptosis.

Fig. 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

SF/HGF/c-Met targeting and γ-radiation synergistically enhance tumor cell apoptosis. Intracranial U87 MG xenografts were established and treated as in Fig. 5. Post-implantation day 21 tumors were then examined for cell apoptosis by imunohistochemistry for activated caspase-3 (A) and TUNEL staining (C). Cell labeling was quantified by computer-assisted image analysis (B and D). Differences in blue-green staining between panels in (A) represent variations in methyl green counterstaining. As expected anti–activated caspase-3generates a predominantly cytoplasmic stain relative to TUNEL that labels condensed/fragmented nuclei. *, P < 0.0001.

Discussion

There are likely multiple mechanisms for the enhanced tumor cell growth arrest and death observed in vivo in this study. Glioma cell–derived SF/HGF activates c-Met receptors present on the tumor cells in an autocrine fashion and on host parenchymal cells (e.g., endothelial cells), in a paracrine fashion. Interfering with the autocrine loop is expected to directly down-regulate glioma cell cycle and cytoprotective pathways (6). The in vitro antiproliferative and cell death responses of U87 MG cells to autocrine loop inhibition using U1/ribozymes in this present study essentially confirm that such direct antitumor effects can occur. These results are also consistent with our previous findings that knocking down c-Met receptor expression in glioma cells lacking an autocrine loop blocks the ability of recombinant SF/HGF to protect against chemotherapy-induced cytotoxicity (5). Inhibiting the paracrine SF/HGF/c-Met loop in tumor xenografts including U87 MG glioma generates an antiangiogenic response that can also enhance tumor responses to cytotoxic therapeutics in vivo as originally proposed by Teicher et al. and recently confirmed in clinical trial (25–28). The relative contributions of autocrine and paracrine pathway inhibition to the potentiation of γ-radiation by SF/HGF/c-Met pathway targeting have not been specifically defined and may vary between tumor types, organ sites, and mode of pathway inhibition (i.e., systemic versus direct intratumoral).

We found that anti-SF/HGF and anti-Met U1/ribozymes enhance antitumor radiation responses in both s.c. and intracranial tumor xenografts, tissue sites with distinct environmental features. These distinctions include vascular phenotype, immunologic environment, extracellular matrix, and the nature of peritumoral mesenchymal cell types (e.g., glial cells being unique to the central nervous system). Thus, the radiosensitizing response to SF/HGF/c-Met pathway inhibition in other c-Met-dependent tumors, many of which commonly metastasize to multiple organ sites, is not likely to be organ specific. Our findings also show that the therapeutic responses to the U1/ribozymes are independent of delivery route (direct intratumoral or systemic) and specific delivery system (plasmid DNA/liposome complexes versus adenovirus). Therefore, nonspecific affects such as those potentially seen from vector-specific host interactions are not likely to account for the antitumor responses observed in our experiments.

The molecular mechanisms by which SF/HGF directly protects against DNA damaging agents have been examined in multiple malignant and nonneoplastic cell lines (15–17). Cytoprotection partially requires signaling through phosphatidylinositol-3′-kinase and the downstream serine/threonine kinase c-Akt, a pathway potently activated by c-Met, in breast carcinoma, glioblastoma, and nonneoplastic Madin-Darby canine kidney cell epithelial cells. Activation of this pathway is accentuated in cells lacking the dual phosphatase MMAC1/PTEN (mutated in multiple aggressive cancers/phosphatase and tensin homologue), a tumor suppressor frequently absent in glioblastoma multiforme and absent in the U87 MG cell line used in this study. Fan et al. (29) have recently found that nuclear factor-κB downstream of c-Akt- and p21-activated kinase (Pak-1) can be additional mediators of SF/HGF-dependent cytoprotection. This recent study further implicated nuclear factor-κB–mediated transcription of at least two genes, TRAF-2 and cIAP-2, in tumor cytoprotection by SF/HGF. A comprehensive understanding of c-Met-dependent cytoprotection, particularly the transcriptional-dependent aspects, remains to be fully determined.

In summary, we show that a molecular therapeutic strategy that targets SF/HGF and c-Met generates potent antitumor activity when combined with γ-radiation. End points supporting the cooperative, and by certain criteria, synergistic antitumor response from combining these two modalities include the regression and apparent cure of s.c. glioma xenografts, the long-term survival and apparent cure of animals bearing intracranial glioma xenografts, and histologic evidence of tumor cell growth arrest and apoptosis. The pronounced cooperative therapeutic responses presented here are significant and timely in light of the expectation that pharmacologic inhibitors of c-Met activation, such as small molecule c-Met kinase inhibitors, receptor antagonists such as truncated SF/HGF proteins (e.g., NK4), decoy soluble chimeric c-Met receptors, or humanized neutralizing anti-SF/HGF and anti-c-Met antibodies, will soon be available for clinical testing (30–33). Our results highlight the need to ultimately evaluate the clinical efficacy of such reagents in conjunction with other cytotoxic regimens such as ionizing radiation therapy and chemotherapy. These would be particularly practical treatment strategies in patients with newly diagnosed malignant glioma, essentially all of who receive radiation often with chemotherapy as first-line therapy (34).

Footnotes

  • Grant support: NIH grants R01 NS32148 (J. Laterra), R01 NS043987 (J. Laterra), and R01 NS045209 (R. Abounader).

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

    • Accepted March 29, 2005.
    • Received January 24, 2005.
    • Revision received March 18, 2005.

References

  1. ↵
    Birchmeier C, Birchmeier W, Gherardi E, Vande Woude GF. Met, metastasis, motility and more. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2003;4:915–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. Koochekpour S, Jeffers M, Rulong S, et al. Met and hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor expression in human gliomas. Cancer Res 1997;57:5391–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Lamszus K, Liang J, Laterra J, et al. Scatter factor promotes motility of human glioma and neuromicrovascular endothelial cells. Int J Cancer 1998;75:19–28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. Freije WA, Castro-Vargas FE, Fang Z, et al. Gene expression profiling of gliomas strongly predicts survival. Cancer Res 2004;64:6503–10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Rosen EM, Laterra J, Joseph A, et al. Scatter factor expression and regulation in human glial tumors. Int J Cancer 1996;67:248–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Bowers DC, Fan S, Rosen EM, Laterra J. Hepatocyte growth factor inhibits chemotherapy and radiation induced cell apoptosis in U373 human glioblastoma cell lines. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 1999;40:325.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    Walter KA, Hossain MA, Luddy C, Goel N, Reznick TE, Laterra J. Scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor stimulation of glioblastoma cell cycle progression through G1 is c-Myc dependent, and independent of p27 suppression, cdk2 activation, or E2F1-dependent transcription. Mol Cell Biol 2002;22:2703–15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Rosen EM, Goldberg ID. Regulation of angiogenesis by scatter factor. EXS 1997;79:193–208.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    Laterra J, Nam M, Rosen E, Rao JS, Johnston P. Scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor gene transfer to 9L glioma cells enhances glioma growth and angiogenesis in vivo. Lab Invest 1997;76:565–77.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    Schmidt MO, Westphal M, Hagel C, et al. Levels of vascular endothelial growth factor, hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor and basic fibroblast growth factor in human gliomas and their relationship to angiogenesis. Int J Cancer 1999;84:10–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Gerritsen ME, Tomlinson JE, Zlot C, Ziman M, Hwang S. Using gene expression profiling to identify the molecular basis of the synergistic actions of hepatocyte growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor in human endothelial cells. Br J Pharmacol 2003;140:595–610.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Frisch SM, Francis H. Disruption of epithelial cell-matrix interactions induce apoptosis. J Cell Biol 1994;124:619–26.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Amicone L, Spagnoli FM, Spath G, et al. Transgenic expression in the liver of truncated Met blocks apoptosis and permits immortalization of hepatocytes. EMBO J 1997;16:495–503.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Hossain MA, Bailone JC, Gomes R, Laterra J. Neuroprotection by scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor and FGF-1 in cerebellar granule neurons is phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt-dependent and MAPK/CREB-independent. J Neurochem 2002;81:365–78.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Bowers DC, Fan S, Walter K, et al. Scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor activates AKT and protects against cytotoxic death in human glioblastoma via PI3-kinase and AKT-dependent pathways. Cancer Res 2000;60:4277–83.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. Fan S, Wang J-A, Yuan R-Q, et al. Scatter factor protects epithelial and carcinoma cells against apoptosis induced by DNA damaging agents. Oncogene 1998;17:131–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Fan S, Ma YX, Wang J, et al. The cytokine scatter factor inhibits apoptosis and enhances DNA repair by a common mechanism involving signaling through phosphatidyl inositol 3′ kinase. Oncogene 2000;19:2212–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Gohda E, Okauchi H, Iwao M, Yamamoto I. Induction of apoptosis by hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor and its augmentation by phorbol esters in Meth A cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1998;245:278–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Arakaki N, Kazi JA, Kazihara T, Ohnishi T, Daikuhara Y. Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor activates the apoptosis signaling pathway by increasing caspase-3 activity in sarcoma 180 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1998;245:211–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Tulasne D, Deheuninck J, Lourenco FC, et al. Proapoptotic function of the MET tyrosine kinase receptor through caspase cleavage. Mol Cell Biol 2004;24:10328–39.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Laterra J, Rosen EM, Nam M, Ranganathan S, Fielding K, Johnston P. Scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor expression enhances human glioblastoma tumorigenicity and growth. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 1997;235:743–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Abounader R, Ranganathan S, Lal B, et al. Reversion of human glioblastoma malignancy by U1 small nuclear RNA/ribozyme targeting of scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor and c-met expression. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:1548–56.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Abounader R, Lal B, Luddy C, et al. In vivo targeting of SF/HGF and c-met expression via U1snRNA/ribozymes inhibits glioma growth and angiogenesis and promotes apoptosis. FASEB J,16:108–110, 2002 (published on-line November 29, 2001; http://www.fasebj.org/cgi/doi/10.1096/fj.01-0421fje).
  24. ↵
    Lal S, Lacroix M, Tofilon P, Fuller GN, Sawaya R, Lang FF. An implantable guide-screw system for brain tumor studies in small animals. J Neurosurg 2000;92:326–33.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    Teicher BA, Holden SA, Ara G, Korbut T, Menon K. Comparison of several antiangiogenic regimens alone and with cytotoxic therapies in the Lewis lung carcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1996;38:169–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. Hess C, Vuong V, Hegyi I, et al. Effect of VEGF receptor inhibitor PTK787/ZK222584 [correction of ZK222548] combined with ionizing radiation on endothelial cells and tumour growth. Br J Cancer 2001;85:2010–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. Teicher BA. A systems approach to cancer therapy. (Antioncogenics + standard cytotoxics–mechanism(s) of interaction). Cancer Metastasis Rev 1996;15:247–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Mayer RJ. Two steps forward in the treatment of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2406–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Fan S, Gao M, Meng Q, et al. Role of NF-KB signaling in hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor mediated cell protection. Oncogene 2005;24:1749–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Christensen JG, Schreck R, Burrows J, et al. A selective small molecule inhibitor of c-Met kinase inhibits c-Met-dependent phenotypes in vitro and exhibits cytoreductive antitumor activity in vivo. Cancer Res 2003;63:7345–55.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. Date K, Matsumoto K, Kuba K, Shimura H, Tanaka M, Nakamura T. Inhibition of tumor growth and invasion by a four-kringle antagonist (HGF/NK4) for hepatocyte growth factor. Oncogene 1998;17:3045–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. Michieli P, Mazzone M, Basilico C, et al. Targeting the tumor and its microenvironment by a dual-function decoy Met receptor. Cancer Cell 2004;6:61–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Cao B, Su Y, Oskarsson M, et al. Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies to hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF) display antitumor activity in animal models. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001;98:7443–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    Chang SM, Lamborn KR, Malec M, et al. Phase II study of temozolomide and thalidomide with radiation therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004;60:353–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Clinical Cancer Research: 11 (12)
June 2005
Volume 11, Issue 12
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Clinical Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Targeting the c-Met Pathway Potentiates Glioblastoma Responses to γ-Radiation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical Cancer Research.
Citation Tools
Targeting the c-Met Pathway Potentiates Glioblastoma Responses to γ-Radiation
Bachchu Lal, Shuli Xia, Roger Abounader and John Laterra
Clin Cancer Res June 15 2005 (11) (12) 4479-4486; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0166

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Targeting the c-Met Pathway Potentiates Glioblastoma Responses to γ-Radiation
Bachchu Lal, Shuli Xia, Roger Abounader and John Laterra
Clin Cancer Res June 15 2005 (11) (12) 4479-4486; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0166
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Targeting HER2 with Osimertinib in NSCLC
  • Combined VEGF/EGFR Inhibition
  • Radiotherapy with IDO1/PD-1 Blockade Treats Advanced GBM
Show more Cancer Therapy: Preclinical
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • CCR Focus Archive
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians
  • Reviewers

About Clinical Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2019 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Clinical Cancer Research
eISSN: 1557-3265
ISSN: 1078-0432

Advertisement