Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Cancer Therapy: Preclinical

Evaluation of Toxicity following Electrically Mediated Interleukin-12 Gene Delivery in a B16 Mouse Melanoma Model

Loree Heller, Kathleen Merkler, Jeffrey Westover, Yolmari Cruz, Domenico Coppola, Kaaron Benson, Adil Daud and Richard Heller
Loree Heller
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathleen Merkler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey Westover
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yolmari Cruz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Domenico Coppola
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kaaron Benson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adil Daud
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Heller
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2727 Published May 2006
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Purpose: Interleukin-12 (IL-12) has potential as an immunotherapeutic agent for the treatment of cancer but is unfortunately associated with toxicity. Delivery of a plasmid encoding IL-12 with electroporation induces an antitumor effect in the B16 mouse melanoma model without serious side effects. To translate this observation to the clinic, an evaluation of toxicity was done in the mouse model.

Experimental Design: Weight change, tumor response, blood chemistry and hematology values, and serum IL-12 levels were evaluated. Multiple tissues were analyzed histopathologically.

Results: A pronounced reduction in tumor volume, including a large percentage of complete regressions, was observed after electrically mediated gene therapy. No significant increases in serum IL-12 levels were detected. Tumor-bearing mice showed an increased number of atypical hematology values when compared with normal naive controls. Statistically significant differences in chemistry and hematology values were observed sporadically in most of the standard chemistry and hematology categories in all groups. The only histopathologic abnormality specific to the animals receiving both plasmid and electroporation was inflammation associated with the kidney at the last time point.

Conclusions: In general, mice that received both plasmid and electroporation showed the least abnormal histopathologic findings and were found to be in the best health, reflecting the reduced burden of disease. No significant toxic effects due to the IL-12 gene therapy were observed.

  • melanoma
  • gene therapy
  • interlukin-12
  • electroporation
  • melanoma/skin cancers

Interleukin-12 (IL-12) is a versatile cytokine and has great potential as an immunotherapeutic agent for the treatment of cancer. Recombinant protein therapy has had some success, but unfortunately it has been associated with toxicity. When given systemically in a phase I clinical trial, recombinant IL-12 induced multiple serious adverse effects, including renal and systemic toxicity (1, 2). High-dose levels were linked to temporary immune suppression, which would be unfavorable for effective immunotherapy. A successful anticancer treatment protocol should be one that initiates an extensive, rapid immune response without inducing these toxic side effects. Delivery of IL-12 in the form of gene therapy for melanomas has shown some success without serious adverse side effects (3, 4) and has reached clinical trials (5).

Electroporation is a physical method that facilitates uptake of molecules by increasing the permeability of the cell membrane. In vivo electroporation has been used to deliver chemotherapeutic agents, such as bleomycin, in both animal studies and clinical trials (6–14). The same rationale for using in vivo electroporation to deliver chemotherapeutic agents is valid for the delivery of larger molecules, such as plasmid DNA. Electrically mediated delivery of several cytokine cDNAs has been shown in the B16 melanoma model (15–22).

Many of the preclinical IL-12 studies examining delivery of DNA encoding the IL-12 cDNAs as a single treatment for melanoma have been conducted in the poorly immunogenic and metastatic B16 murine melanoma model. Significant inhibition of tumor growth was observed after adenoviral delivery (17) as well as delivery mediated by Semliki Forest virus (23). Plasmids encoding the cDNAs have been delivered therapeutically in this model using the gene gun (3), electroporation (17, 18, 21, 22), injection alone (24), or a chemical carrier (25). The majority of studies have shown inhibition of tumor growth or limited tumor regression. IL-12 gene therapy has also resulted in the regression of established tumors and protection against lung metastasis following challenge in this model (22, 26, 27).

Complete regression of established B16-F10 melanomas has only been observed after DNA delivery by in vivo electroporation (21, 22) or when electroporation was used to deliver IL-12 plasmid in combination with bleomycin (28). Intratumor injection of a plasmid encoding IL-12 followed by electroporation results in an 80% cure rate of established B16-F10 tumors in mice (22). Twelve of 12 cured mice were resistant to subsequent challenge with B16-F10 cells. In addition, i.m. injection of plasmid encoding IL-12 followed by electroporation significantly reduced the formation of lung colonies following i.v. injection of B16-F10 cells. Electrically mediated IL-12 plasmid delivery resulted in both a therapeutic response to existing tumors and a prophylactic effect against metastases. To translate this to the clinic, the following study was done to fully characterize the potential toxicity following treatment by intratumor in vivo electroporation of IL-12 plasmid DNA.

Materials and Methods

This study was approved by the University of South Florida Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Tampa, FL). This committee follows USPHS Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (www.grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/olaw.htm#pol).

Cells lines and propagation. B16-F10 murine melanoma cells (CRL 6475, American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD) were maintained as monolayers in 90% McCoy's medium with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% gentamicin. The cells were removed from flasks using trypsin-EDTA (0.05% trypsin-0.53 mmol/L EDTA; Mediatech), collected by centrifugation, and washed, and cell viability was assessed by trypan blue exclusion dye method. Cells with a viability of >90% were resuspended in sterile PBS at 2 × 107/mL for injection.

Tumor induction. Tumors were established in the flank of 6- to 7-week-old male and female C57Bl/6 mice (National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland) by the s.c. injection of 0.05 mL (106) B16-F10 cells. Tumors were allowed to grow for 7 to 10 days to a volume of 40 to 50 mm3 before treatment.

Plasmid. pUCMV3-mIL-12 (Aldevron, Fargo, ND), containing the murine p35 and p40 IL-12 cDNAs under the control of the cytomegalovirus promoter, was prepared by the manufacturer. Endotoxin levels were <100 endotoxin units/mg. Before use, plasmid DNA was diluted in 0.9% sterile injectable saline to the appropriate concentration for each experiment.

Tumor treatment. Treatments were done on days 1, 5, and 8 after tumor growth. Briefly, mice were initially anesthetized in an induction chamber that was infused with a mixture of 3% isoflurane and 97% O2 for several minutes then fitted with a standard rodent mask supplied with 2% isoflurane in O2. Group 1 animals received only an intratumor 0.05 mL saline injection. Group 2 animals received an intratumor injection of 0.05 mL 0.1 mg/mL pUCMV3-mIL-12 only. In Group 3, injection of 0.05 mL 0.1 mg/mL pUCMV3-mIL-12 was followed by application of six 0.1 ms pulses with field strength of 1,300 V/cm from a MedPulser Electroporation System (Inovio Biomedical Corporation, San Diego, CA) delivered using a six needle array. Group 4 received an intratumor injection of 0.05 mL 1 mg/mL pUCMV3-mIL-12 only, whereas group 5 received an intratumor injection of 0.05 mL 1 mg/mL pUCMV3-mIL-12 followed by pulses.

Tumor monitoring. Tumors were monitored every 2 to 3 days; not all data points were shown. Tumors were monitored using a digital caliper. Tumor volume was calculated by the standard formula v = πab2/6, where a is the longest diameter and b is the next longest diameter perpendicular to a.

Sample collection. Each mouse was monitored for body weight and general condition on a daily basis beginning the day before the first treatment. The general condition of the mice included examination of the coat, demeanor, and health of the animal. The evaluation of demeanor and health of the mouse was determined by observing if the mouse was eating, drinking, and moving without discomfort.

On days 9 (the day after the third treatment), 11, 16, 23, and 30 after treatment, 10 mice from each group (5 male and 5 female) were euthanatized. Blood was collected from each animal in heparinized tubes, and tissue samples taken in order: brain, spleen, kidney, liver, lung, heart, lymph nodes, then finally tumor, and skin around the tumor. Different sets of instruments were used to avoid cross-contamination.

Histologic analysis. Tissue samples from groups 1, 4, and 5 on days 9, 16, and 30 were blinded and analyzed histologically. Each specimen obtained for analysis was submitted entirely for histologic examination. Radial and sagittal sections were taken. After fixation, sections were stained with H&E (Richard-Allan Scientific, Kalamazoo, MI) using standard histologic techniques.

Results

Treatments were done on days 1, 5, and 8 after tumor growth (see Materials and Methods). Group 1 animals received only an intratumor 0.05 mL saline injection. Group 2 animals received a low-dose (0.005 mg pUCMV3-mIL-12) intratumor injection only. In group 3 animals, a low-dose intratumor plasmid injection was followed by application of pulses as described. Group 4 received a high-dose (0.05 mg pUCMV3-mIL-12) intratumor injection only, whereas group 5 received a high-dose intratumor plasmid injection followed by pulses.

General health status and survival. No significant weight loss was observed in any of the treatment groups when compared with the group that received saline injection alone (group 1). Five of the group 1 males, two of the group 1 females, and one group 4 male did not survive to the final time point due to unimpeded tumor growth. Overall, mice seemed to have a generally healthy appearance with the exception of the tumor growth.

Tumor growth or regression. Tumor growth in most male groups and in all female treated groups was significantly delayed when compared with group 1 (Fig. 1 ). Tumors continued to grow in group 1 mice with no objective or complete responses observed. In males, all treated groups showed a significant reduction in tumor growth from day 13 to 23, with the exception of group 4, which showed no significant difference from group 1 during this time period. In females, all treated groups showed a significant reduction in tumor growth from day 11 to 23. Day 30 (the final day tested) was significantly different in group 5 only. This pronounced reduction in tumor volume included a large percentage of complete regressions, particularly at the later time points.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Tumor growth: females (a) and males (b). ○, group 1; Δ, group 2; ▴, group 3; ∇, group 4; □, group 5.

The regression status of all mice was observed at the time points the mice were euthanatized for toxicity studies (Fig. 2 ). Complete regressions were observed in males in groups 3 and 5, whereas complete regression was observed in females in groups 3, 4, and 5. All deaths before euthanasia were due to disease progression. Metastatic disease was observed on necropsy in six males (groups 1 and 4) and two females (group 1).

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Response rates. Columns, percentage of mice that had an objective response (A and B) or complete response (C and D). There were five mice at each time point for each group, except for group 1 on day 30 (zero male and three female survivors) and group 4 on day 30 (four male and five female survivors).

Chemistry and hematology findings. Blood chemistry and hematology values were established in 10 male and 10 female naive, healthy mice (Tables 1 and 2 ). At 9, 11, 16, 23, and 30 days after the initial plasmid delivery, whole blood from five males and five females in each group was tested and compared with the established normal values.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Complete blood count values for normal, healthy mice

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Mean blood chemistry for normal, healthy mice

Group 1 mice showed an increased number of atypical hematology values when compared with normal naive controls, although blood chemistry values were not more likely to be atypical than in the treated groups. Statistically significant differences (P < 0.01) were observed sporadically in most of 17 standard hematology categories (Table 3 ). Male values tended to be significantly decreased or increased more often than female values. In both males and females, group 1 mice displayed increasingly aberrant values with time. In males, RBCs, hemoglobin, and hematocrit in particular were reduced at later time points. In females, hemoglobin and hematocrit were reduced, whereas an increased mean platelet volume (MPV) was observed at later time points. Females in groups 2, 3, and 4 did not show trends in significantly different values, whereas females in group 5 showed a decreased mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) concentration (MCHC) over time. Males in group 2 tended to have an increased RBC distribution width (RDW). Males in group 3 showed increased RBCs and hemoglobin only at the early time points. Group 4 males showed decreased RBCs, hemoglobin, and hematocrits at later time points. Untreated mice showed progressive lymphocytopenia, anemia, and neutrophilia. These changes were seen but to a lesser extent in the injection-only groups. No significant abnormalities were seen in the high-dose electroporation group. These results suggest that the combination of plasmid injection and electroporation was not associated with bone marrow suppression.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Complete blood count values differing from mean of normal, healthy mice (P < 0.01)

In female untreated mice, progressive azotemia and hypoalbuminemia was seen with progressive melanoma (Table 4 ). These changes were observed also in the injection-only group of females but not in females that received high dose of plasmid and electroporation. In the male mice, these abnormalities were seen, and, in addition, hypoglycemia was also observed in the untreated males. In males that received injection of plasmid and electroporation, these changes were also observed but to a lesser extent.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4.

Blood chemistry values differing from mean of normal, healthy mice (P < 0.01)

Serum was also assayed for levels of IL-12 following each treatment. No significant serum IL-12 levels were seen in any group (data not shown).

Histopathology. In general, the untreated animals comprised the most profound histopathologic abnormalities. The predominant tissue that showed metastatic spread was the skin around the tumor. Tumor growth in the skin was found in 31% of group 1 mice, whereas only 12% of group 4 mice and 8% of group 5 mice were positive. It should be noted that the tumor growth in the skin observed in group 5 mice occurred predominately at an early time point (day 9). Metastatic spread was also particularly observed to the lymph nodes and liver in groups 1 (12% to both tissues) and 4 mice (17% lymph nodes and 12% liver). Lymph nodes (4%) and liver (2%) involvement was greatly decreased in group 5 mice, although, in one mouse in this group, kidney and spleen metastases were observed. No metastases were observed in the lungs, heart, or brain in any group. In addition, acute and chronic inflammation in the skin around the tumor was observed particularly in groups 1 (12% to in both tissues) and 4 (17% in lymph nodes and 12% in liver).

No abnormalities were seen in brain or heart tissue. Lungs were congested, and focal acute and chronic inflammation was observed in all mice. Most mice showed extramedullary hematopoiesis, which is a common and normal phenomenon in the spleen of C57Bl/6 mice (29). Focal inflammation in the kidney was not observed in group 1 females but was observed in two of five group 4 females by day 16 and one of five by day 30. Two of five group 5 females also showed focal inflammation in the kidney at day 16, and the level of inflammation increased to four of five by day 30. In males, kidneys in groups 1 and 4 males were normal, but three of five of the group 5 males showed focal glomerulosclerosis at the later time points.

Discussion

IL-12 is a cytokine that shows promise as an anticancer agent. In human phase I clinical trials, systemic infusions of recombinant IL-12 protein were toxic but showed clinical activity. Since then, multiple investigators have shown that, in animal models, direct delivery of IL-12 to the tumor site maintains its anticancer activity but avoids much of the toxic side effects (4, 26, 30). Recent phase I melanoma clinical trials using localized IL-12 gene therapy alone have reported local production of IL-12 via injection of naked plasmid DNA (5) or of IL-12 producing transduced autologous cells (31, 32). Recent preclinical data suggest that the efficacy of IL-12 gene therapy can be dramatically increased by electrically mediated gene transfer (22, 21).

Pulsed electric fields (electroporation) are effective means of enhancing intracellular delivery of molecules in vivo. Electrochemotherapy, which combines an antitumor drug with electroporation, is an effective localized treatment for a variety of tumor types (33). This electrically enhanced drug delivery has progressed to several successful clinical trials (34, 35). Because electroporation is a physical method that facilitates uptake of molecules by increasing the permeability of the cell membrane, it can be used to effectively deliver a variety of molecules to a broad range of cell types. The main limitation to in vivo electroporation is the ability to access the tissue to inject the molecule to be delivered and properly place the electrodes. Although electric fields have been used to deliver chemotherapy (electrochemotherapy) to s.c. tumors, they have not been used to introduce DNA constructs in humans. The use of electric pulses for the in vivo delivery of genes is in an earlier stage of development.

Several studies have indicated that gene delivery could potentially achieve a similar success as drug delivery (30). Studies accomplished thus far have shown that in vivo electroporation could enhance the delivery of plasmid DNA to several tissue types. Of interest is the ability to control the expression levels and kinetics of expression by carefully choosing the electroporation variables (30, 36).

The electroporation conditions (field strength, pulse duration, and electrodes) proposed to be used for the IL-12 electrogene transfer study are essentially the same as those used in the electrochemotherapy clinical studies. These conditions were well tolerated in the electrochemotherapy trials. Although electrochemotherapy has had tremendous success in inducing tumor regression, this effect was localized to the treated lesion. Therefore, the effect could be even higher for gene delivery, as this therapy could potentially elicit systemic effects. Results presented in this report as well as in previous studies have shown the potential of this delivery system as part of an antitumor regimen. Work in the B16-F10 model produced strong evidence of this potential. Complete long-term responses can be obtained following treatment of established melanoma tumors using this system to deliver a plasmid encoding IL-12. The majority of mice that had durable long-term regressions were also resistant to challenge (21, 22). In addition, intramuscular delivery produced high serum cytokine levels, which prevented the formation of lung lesions following tail vein injection of B16-F10 cells (22).

Although the potential efficacy of this approach has been shown in preclinical animal studies, it was necessary to evaluate potential toxicity of this approach to translate this delivery approach to the clinic. Although a previous study showed that there was minimal toxicity associated with direct delivery (intratumor injection of plasmid) of IL-12 plasmid in the B16 mouse melanoma model (4), electrically mediated delivery had not been evaluated. Therefore, this study was designed to assess toxicity associated with this therapeutic approach. The results of this study showed that there was no significant toxicity associated with the electrically mediated delivery of a plasmid encoding IL-12. The only abnormality specific to animals receiving both plasmid and electroporation was inflammation associated with the kidney at the late time point. We did not, however, observe creatinine elevation in these mice. In human renal disease, focal glomerulosclerosis can manifest with asymptomatic proteinuria or edema (37). Therefore, we would recommend monitoring of renal function in human IL-12/electroporation trials and should include monitoring of blood urea nitrogen (BUN)/creatinine, urine sediment, and hypotension. It should also be pointed out that, in general, these mice showed the least abnormal histopathologic findings and were found to be in the best health, which, we believe, reflects a reduced burden of disease.

Acknowledgments

We thank the clinical chemistry laboratory at the Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute (Tampa, FL) for doing the serum chemistry analysis, the University of South Florida Division of Comparative Medicine for doing the complete blood count analysis, and the Inovio Biomedical Corporation for supplying pulse generator and electrodes.

Footnotes

  • Grant support: University of South Florida Center for Molecular Delivery.

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

    • Accepted March 3, 2006.
    • Received December 13, 2005.
    • Revision received February 22, 2006.

References

  1. ↵
    Leonard JP, Sherman ML, Fisher GL, et al. Effects of single-dose interleukin-12 exposure on interleukin-12-associated toxicity and interferon-γ production. Blood 1997;90:2541–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Colombo MP, Trinchieri G. Interleukin-12 in anti-tumor immunity and immunotherapy. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2002;13:155–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Rakhmilevich AL, Timmins JG, Janssen K, et al. Gene gun-mediated IL-12 gene therapy induces antitumor effects in the absence of toxicity: a direct comparison with systemic IL-12 protein therapy. J Immunother 1999;22:135–44.
  4. ↵
    Imboden M, Shi F, Pugh TD, et al. Safety of interleukin-12 gene therapy against cancer: a murine biodistribution and toxicity study. Hum Gene Ther 2003;14:1037–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Heinzerling L, Burg G, Dummer R, et al. Intratumoral injection of DNA encoding human interleukin 12 into patients with metastatic melanoma: clinical efficacy. Hum Gene Ther 2005;16:35–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Mir LM, Belehradek M, Domenge C, et al. Electrochemotherapy, a new antitumor treatment: first clinical trial. C R Acad Sci III 1991;313:613–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. Heller R, Jaroszeski MJ, Glass LF, et al. Phase I/II trial for the treatment of cutaneous and subcutaneous tumors using electrochemotherapy. Cancer 1996;77:964–71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. Jaroszeski MJ, Gilbert R, Heller R. Electrochemotherapy: An emerging drug delivery method for the treatment of cancer. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 1997;26:185–97.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. Heller R, Jaroszeski M, Perrott R, Messina J, Gilbert R. Effective treatment of B16 melanoma by direct delivery of bleomycin using electrochemotherapy. Melanoma Res 1997;7:10–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. Gilbert RA, Jaroszeski MJ, Heller R. Novel electrode designs for electrochemotherapy. Biochim Biophys Acta 1997;1334:9–14.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. Heller R, Jaroszeski MJ, Reintgen DS, et al. Treatment of cutaneous and subcutaneous tumors with electrochemotherapy using intralesional bleomycin. Cancer 1998;83:148–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. Panje WR, Hier MP, Garman GR, et al. Electroporation therapy of head and neck cancer. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1998;107:779–85.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. Jaroszeski MJ, Heller R, Gilbert R, editors. Electrochemotherapy, electrogenetherapy, and transdermal drug delivery: electrically mediated delivery of molecules to cells. Totowa (NJ): Humana Press; 2000.
  14. ↵
    Gehl J, Geertsen PF. Efficient palliation of haemorrhaging malignant melanoma skin metastases by electrochemotherapy. Melanoma Res 2000;10:585–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Niu G, Heller R, Catlett-Falcone R, et al. Gene therapy with dominant-negative Stat3 suppresses growth of the murine melanoma B16 tumor in vivo. Cancer Res 1999;59:5059–63.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. Heller L, Pottinger C, Jaroszeski MJ, Gilbert R, Heller R. In vivo electroporation of plasmids encoding GM-CSF or interleukin-2 into existing B16 melanomas combined with electrochemotherapy induces long-term antitumour immunity. Melanoma Res 2000;10:577–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Lohr F, Lo DY, Zaharoff DA, et al. Effective tumor therapy with plasmid-encoded cytokines combined with in vivo electroporation. Cancer Res 2001;61:3281–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Kishida T, Asada H, Satoh E, et al. In vivo electroporation-mediated transfer of interleukin-12 and interleukin-18 genes induces significant antitumor effects against melanoma in mice. Gene Ther 2001;8:1234–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. Heller LC, Ingram SF, Lucas ML, Gilbert RA, Heller R. Effect of electrically mediated intratumor and intramuscular delivery of a plasmid encoding IFN α on visible B16 mouse melanomas. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2002;1:205–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. Lucas ML, Heller R. Immunomodulation by electrically enhanced delivery of plasmid DNA encoding IL-12 to murine skeletal muscle. Mol Ther 2001;3:47–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Lucas ML, Heller L, Coppola D, Heller R. IL-12 plasmid delivery by in vivo electroporation for the successful treatment of established subcutaneous B16.F10 melanoma. Mol Ther 2002;5:668–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Lucas ML, Heller R. IL-12 gene therapy using an electrically mediated nonviral approach reduces metastatic growth of melanoma. DNA Cell Biol 2003;22:755–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Asselin-Paturel C, Lassau N, Guinebretiere JM, et al. Transfer of the murine interleukin-12 gene in vivo by a Semliki Forest virus vector induces B16 tumor regression through inhibition of tumor blood vessel formation monitored by Doppler ultrasonography. Gene Ther 1999;6:606–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Heinzerling L, Dummer R, Pavlovic J, et al. Tumor regression of human and murine melanoma after intratumoral injection of IL-12-encoding plasmid DNA in mice. Exp Dermatol 2002;11:232–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Iwashita Y, Ogawa T, Goto S, et al. Effective transfer of interleukin-12 gene to solid tumors using a novel gene delivery system, poly [D,L-2,4-diaminobutyric acid]. Cancer Gene Ther 2004;11:103–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Schultz J, Pavlovic J, Strack B, Nawrath M, Moelling K. Long-lasting anti-metastatic efficiency of interleukin 12-encoding plasmid DNA. Hum Gene Ther 1999;10:407–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Hirschowitz EA, Crystal RG. Adenovirus-mediated expression of interleukin-12 induces natural killer cell activity and complements adenovirus-directed gp75 treatment of melanoma lung metastases. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1999;20:935–41.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    Kishida T, Asada H, Itokawa Y, et al. Electrochemo-gene therapy of cancer: intratumoral delivery of interleukin-12 gene and bleomycin synergistically induced therapeutic immunity and suppressed subcutaneous and metastatic melanomas in mice. Mol Ther 2003;8:738–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Mohr U, Dungworth D, Capen C, et al., editors. Pathobiology of the aging mouse. Washington (DC): International Life Sciences Institute Press; 1996.
  30. ↵
    Heller LC, Ugen K, Heller R. Electroporation for targeted gene transfer. Exp Op Drug Del 2005;2:255–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. ↵
    Sun Y, Jurgovsky K, Moller P, et al. Vaccination with IL-12 gene-modified autologous melanoma cells: preclinical results and a first clinical phase I study. Gene Ther 1998;5:481–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Kang WK, Park C, Yoon HL, et al. Interleukin 12 gene therapy of cancer by peritumoral injection of transduced autologous fibroblasts: outcome of a phase I study. Hum Gene Ther 2001;12:671–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Gothelf A, Mir LM, Gehl J. Electrochemotherapy: results of cancer treatment using enhanced delivery of bleomycin by electroporation. Cancer Treat Rev 2003;29:371–87.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Mir LM, Glass LF, Sersa G, et al. Effective treatment of cutaneous and subcutaneous malignant tumours by electrochemotherapy. Br J Cancer 1998;77:2336–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    Heller R, Gilbert R, Jaroszeski MJ. Clinical applications of electrochemotherapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 1999;35:119–29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    Andre F, Mir LM. DNA electrotransfer: its principles and an updated review of its therapeutic applications. Gene Ther 2004;11 Suppl 1:S33–42.
  37. ↵
    Appel G. Glomerular Disorders. In: Goldman L, Ausiello D, editors. Cecil Textbook of Medicine. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2004. p. 726–33.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Clinical Cancer Research: 12 (10)
May 2006
Volume 12, Issue 10
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Clinical Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of Toxicity following Electrically Mediated Interleukin-12 Gene Delivery in a B16 Mouse Melanoma Model
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Evaluation of Toxicity following Electrically Mediated Interleukin-12 Gene Delivery in a B16 Mouse Melanoma Model
Loree Heller, Kathleen Merkler, Jeffrey Westover, Yolmari Cruz, Domenico Coppola, Kaaron Benson, Adil Daud and Richard Heller
Clin Cancer Res May 15 2006 (12) (10) 3177-3183; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2727

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Evaluation of Toxicity following Electrically Mediated Interleukin-12 Gene Delivery in a B16 Mouse Melanoma Model
Loree Heller, Kathleen Merkler, Jeffrey Westover, Yolmari Cruz, Domenico Coppola, Kaaron Benson, Adil Daud and Richard Heller
Clin Cancer Res May 15 2006 (12) (10) 3177-3183; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2727
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • PK/PD Model of a Bispecific DART Molecule in Monkeys
  • STAT3/HOTAIR/EZH2 Regulates HNSCC Growth
  • TAZ is a Potent Mediator of aRMS Tumorigenesis
Show more Cancer Therapy: Preclinical
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • CCR Focus Archive
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Clinical Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Clinical Cancer Research
eISSN: 1557-3265
ISSN: 1078-0432

Advertisement