Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis

Methylation of Serum DNA Is an Independent Prognostic Marker in Colorectal Cancer

Maike Wallner, Andreas Herbst, Andrea Behrens, Alexander Crispin, Petra Stieber, Burkhard Göke, Rolf Lamerz and Frank T. Kolligs
Maike Wallner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas Herbst
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea Behrens
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander Crispin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Petra Stieber
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Burkhard Göke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rolf Lamerz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank T. Kolligs
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1264 Published December 2006
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Kaplan-Meier analysis of the probability of survival.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
  • Table 1.

    Characteristics of the gene evaluation and test sets

    CharacteristicsGene evaluation set (n = 38), %Test set (n = 104), %P*
    Gender0.117
        Male6856
        Female3244
    Size of tumor†0.631
        T158
        T2512
        T36968
        T42112
    Nodal status†0.912
        N04052
        N16048
    Distant metastases†0.675
        M06383
        M13717
    Localization†‡
        Right§38240.739
        Left∥6276
        Colon62580.739
        Rectum3842
    Grading0.504
        G133
        G24452
        G3¶5345
    UICC stage0.196
        I1014
        II2133
        III3236
        IV3717
    • ↵* P values for the comparison of numbers of patients were calculated by means of the χ2 test.

    • ↵† For one patient of the test set, tumor localization and information on TNM staging was not available.

    • ↵‡ For one patient of the gene evaluation set, tumor localization was unknown.

    • ↵§ Right colon includes cecum through transverse colon.

    • ↵∥ G3 left colon includes descending colon through rectum.

    • ↵¶ G3 includes all cases classified as G3 or as G2-G3.

  • Table 2.

    Frequency of methylated genes in serum DNA of the gene evaluation set

    GeneHealthy controls (n = 20)Local disease (n = 24)Metastasized disease (n = 14)
    APC202143
    HIC110414
    HLTF01750
    hMLH10443
    HPP101336
    p16602564
    RASSF1A1040
    SFRP110170
    SFRP2047
    SFRP45130
    SFRP55414
    WT11540
    • NOTE: Values in table expressed as % positive.

  • Table 3.

    Distribution of PMR values in serum of 141 patients with colorectal cancer

    PMRHLTFHPP1hMLH1
    I+IIIIIIVI+IIIIIIVI+IIIIIIV
    0504116584517423219
    0-532432611137
    5-25252024131
    >25619004714
  • Table 4.

    Frequency of methylated genes according to clinicopathologic features

    CharacteristicsNo. patients*HLTFHPP1hMLH1
    % PositiveP†% PositiveP†% PositiveP†
    Size of tumor0.030.0210.047
        T1 + T2 + T390281120
        T413462346
    Nodal status0.5140.0260.494
        N05420624
        N149222022
    Distant metastases0.009<0.0010.181
        M08616526
        M117475312
    Localization0.0490.1560.100
        Right‡252412
        Left§78201427
        Colon60150.05470.061220.408
        Rectum43301926
    Grading0.8720.7960.316
        G133300
        G253211319
        G3∥45221329
    UICC stage0.042<0.0010.648
        I1520727
        II3415324
        III3716527
        IV17475312
    • ↵* For one patient, tumor localization and information on TNM staging was not available.

    • ↵† P values were calculated by the χ2 test.

    • ↵‡ Right colon includes cecum through transverse colon.

    • ↵§ Left colon includes descending colon through rectum.

    • ↵∥ Relative risk was calculated for G3 versus G1 and G2. G3 includes all cases classified as G3 or G2-G3.

  • Table 5.

    Results of univariate analysis

    VariableNo. patients who died/total no.Relative risk of death (95% CI)*P*
    Size of tumor0.025
        T1 + T2 + T321/66
        T47/101.3 (1.1-1.6)
    Nodal status0.065
        N010/39
        N118/371.4 (1.0-3.8)
    Distant metastases0.034
        M019/61
        M19/152.5 (1.1-5.6)
    Localization
        Right†6/17
        Left‡22/601.1 (0.4-2.7)0.873
        Colon12/40
        Rectum16/371.3 (0.9-1.9)0.198
    Grading0.363
        G10/1
        G213/38
        G3§14/351.2 (0.6-2.6)
    UICC stage0.025
        I3/10
        II5/240.7 (0.2-2.9)
        III11/272.1 (0.7-6.0)
        IV9/151.9 (0.8-4.5)
    HLTF methylation0.008
        Unmethylated17/60
        Methylated11/173.0 (1.4-6.4)
    HPP1 methylation0.001
        Unmethylated20/68
        Methylated8/95.1 (2.2-11.6)
    hMLH1 methylation0.425
        Unmethylated20/59
        Methylated8/181.4 (0.6-3.1)
    HPP1 ± HLTF<0.001
        Unmethylated14/57
        Methylated14/204.2 (2.0-9.0)
    • ↵* 95% CIs and P values were calculated by the Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.

    • ↵† Right colon includes cecum through transverse colon.

    • ↵‡ Left colon includes descending colon through rectum.

    • ↵§ G3 includes all cases classified as G3 or as G2-G3. The relative risk was calculated for G1 and G2 versus G3.

  • Table 6.

    Multivariate analysis

    VariableRelative risk of death (95% CI)P
    Size of tumor
        (T1 + T2) vs (T3 + T4)0.9 (0.5-1.6)0.735
    Lymph node metastases
        Yes vs no1.9 (0.9-4.3)0.620
    Distant metastases
        Yes vs no1.3 (0.5-3.2)0.735
    Age1.0 (1.0-1.1)0.382
    HPP1 ± HLTF vs unmethylated3.4 (1.4-8.1)0.007

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplementary Data Wallner, et al.

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplementary Table 1
PreviousNext
Back to top
Clinical Cancer Research: 12 (24)
December 2006
Volume 12, Issue 24
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Clinical Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Methylation of Serum DNA Is an Independent Prognostic Marker in Colorectal Cancer
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Methylation of Serum DNA Is an Independent Prognostic Marker in Colorectal Cancer
Maike Wallner, Andreas Herbst, Andrea Behrens, Alexander Crispin, Petra Stieber, Burkhard Göke, Rolf Lamerz and Frank T. Kolligs
Clin Cancer Res December 15 2006 (12) (24) 7347-7352; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1264

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Methylation of Serum DNA Is an Independent Prognostic Marker in Colorectal Cancer
Maike Wallner, Andreas Herbst, Andrea Behrens, Alexander Crispin, Petra Stieber, Burkhard Göke, Rolf Lamerz and Frank T. Kolligs
Clin Cancer Res December 15 2006 (12) (24) 7347-7352; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1264
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Variability in Assessing Response in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
  • 18FDG PET-MRI of Breast Tumors: Feasibility
  • TP53 in Breast Cancer
Show more Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • CCR Focus Archive
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Clinical Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Clinical Cancer Research
eISSN: 1557-3265
ISSN: 1078-0432

Advertisement