Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
    • CME
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CCR Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Breast Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Cancer Therapy: Preclinical

Identification of a Highly Immunogenic HLA-A*01-Binding T Cell Epitope of WT1

Anne Marie Asemissen, Ulrich Keilholz, Stefan Tenzer, Margret Müller, Steffen Walter, Stefan Stevanovic, Hansjörg Schild, Anne Letsch, Eckhard Thiel, Hans-Georg Rammensee and Carmen Scheibenbogen
Anne Marie Asemissen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ulrich Keilholz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefan Tenzer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Margret Müller
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steffen Walter
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefan Stevanovic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hansjörg Schild
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne Letsch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eckhard Thiel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hans-Georg Rammensee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carmen Scheibenbogen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1337 Published December 2006
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Purpose: The transcription factor Wilms tumor protein 1 (WT1) belongs to a new generation of tumor antigens, as it is essential for tumor cell proliferation and is highly expressed in various hematologic and solid malignancies. The aim of this study was to apply a modified reverse immunology strategy to identify immunogenic epitopes of WT1 which could be useful for immunotherapy.

Experimental Design: Potential HLA-A*01 epitopes predicted by a MHC binding algorithm were screened for recognition by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from patients with spontaneous T cell responses using intracellular cytokine cytometry. Epitope processing was shown by proteasomal cleavage. Epitope-specific T cells were generated from CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cell–depleted PBMC.

Results: One of five predicted HLA-A*01-binding candidate epitopes showed high immunogenicity as 5 of 14 patients with hematologic malignancies had WT1.317-327–reactive T cells ranging from 0.4% to 1.5% of CD3+CD8+ T cells. Proteasomal degradation assays indicated the cleavage of WT1.317-327. The depletion of regulatory T cells from PBMCs enabled the rapid expansion of WT1.317-327–specific CTL, whereas no CTL could be generated from unfractionated PBMC. WT1.317-327–specific CTL efficiently lysed an autologous WT1-expressing tumor cell line but not HLA-A*01–negative WT1-expressing tumor cells. Immunogenicity of the epitope across histologies was verified by the demonstration of spontaneous ex vivo WT1.317-327–specific T cell responses in two of six patients with HLA-A*01–positive melanoma or lung cancer.

Conclusion: In this study, a modified reverse immunology strategy was employed to identify a first immunogenic HLA-A*01–restricted T cell epitope of the tumor antigen WT1, which is of considerable interest for use in vaccination trials.

  • epitope prediction
  • proteasomal cleavage
  • cancer
  • leukemia
  • immunotherapy

The transcription factor Wilms tumor protein 1 (WT1) has recently attracted much interest as a target for the immunotherapy of cancer (1). WT1 is highly expressed in myeloid leukemias and various solid malignancies (2–7). WT1 is different from previously used tumor antigens, as it plays a key pathogenetic role in tumor progression. Treatment with WT1 antisense oligomers results in the growth inhibition of leukemic blasts as well as carcinoma cells (8, 9). HLA-A*0201- and HLA-A*24–restricted epitopes from WT1 have been identified and cytotoxic T cells raised against these epitopes have been shown to lyse carcinoma cell lines and leukemic blasts but not hematopoietic stem cells (10, 11). Several studies showed spontaneous WT1-specific T cell and antibody responses in patients with myeloid leukemias (12–16). First reports from vaccination trials with HLA-A*0201- or HLA-A*24–binding epitopes from WT1 showed the induction of T cell responses associated with clinical responses in patients with breast and lung cancer and acute myeloid leukemia (17, 18).

Thus far, only HLA class I-binding epitopes restricted to HLA-A*0201 and HLA-A*24 have been identified (19–21). The identification of WT1-derived T cell epitopes presented by other HLA class I molecules is of considerable interest for further development of WT1-based treatment strategies.

The search for new T cell epitopes in known tumor antigens using the classical “reverse immunology” strategy has led to the identification of numerous T cell epitopes, most of them restricted to HLA-A*0201 (22). The reverse immunology approach includes the prediction of potential T cell epitopes from known tumor antigens, their analysis for MHC-binding, followed by the in vitro generation of peptide-reactive T cells, and their testing for target cell recognition. This strategy is rather laborious, because of the need for T cell induction against multiple peptides, including many that may not be processed. In the setting of non–HLA-A*0201 alleles, target tumor cells expressing both the respective HLA allele and the target antigen are often not readily available. A more recent approach to increase the efficacy of identifying potential T cell epitopes is the ex vivo screening of predicted candidate epitopes for recognition by T cells from patients that are likely to have mounted a T cell response against the target antigen (23–26). Epitope processing can be verified by in vitro proteasome-mediated digestion pattern analysis. This approach has reliably identified HLA-A*02–binding epitopes from tumor and viral proteins using 25- to 30-mer peptides encompassing the putative epitope (27, 28).

In this study, we have identified a new HLA-A*01 epitope and have thereby evaluated a modified reverse immunology strategy to identify immunogenic T cell epitopes from WT1 combining the following steps: (a) prediction of potential epitopes by the SYFPEITHI algorithm, (b) screening of potential epitopes for recognition by T cells from tumor patients likely to exhibit spontaneous T cell responses against the target antigen, (c) in vitro degradation by constitutive and immunoproteasome to show natural epitope processing, and (d) generation of WT1 epitope–specific CTL from CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cell–depleted peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) to show cytolysis of WT1-expressing tumor cells. Here, we focused on HLA-A*01 because it is the second most prevalent HLA allele (29%) among the Caucasian population and because of the high predictive value for this allele of the prediction algorithm used (29).

Materials and Methods

Patients and healthy controls. PBMC from patients with HLA-A*01–positive acute myeloid leukemia, melanoma, and lung cancer, and from healthy subjects were collected and cryopreserved. The investigation was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee and informed consent was obtained from all individuals. In patients, high-resolution HLA typing was done molecularly by sequence-specific primers, whereas serologic HLA typing was done in healthy individuals.

Cell lines. The TF-1 acute myeloid leukemia cell line (DSMZ, accession no. 334; http://www.dsmz.de/) is HLA-A*01–negative and has strong WT1 expression (2 × 10−1, calculated as a ratio of porphobilinogen deaminase, PBGD, housekeeping gene expression). Cell cultures were done in RPMI medium, supplemented with 10% FCS. The melanoma cell line, UKBF-11 (HLA-A*01–positive; WT1 expression, 4 × 10−2), was established from a patient after surgical resection of a soft tissue metastasis and was maintained in Iscove's medium containing 10% FCS (30).

Epitope prediction. Epitope prediction was done as described previously (31). Briefly, potential HLA-A*01 ligands from the sequence of WT1 were selected using a matrix pattern suitable for the calculation of peptides fitting to the HLA-A*01 motif. Such motif predictions are available on our web page at http://www.syfpeithi.de.

Peptide synthesis. Peptides were synthesized in an Applied Biosystems 432A peptide synthesizer following standard protocols (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Synthesized products were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (Varian Star; Zinsser Analytics, Munich, Germany) and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (G2025A; Hewlett-Packard, Waldbronn, Germany), and purified by preparative high-performance liquid chromatography to purities >95%.

Quantification of WT1 expression. Quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR was done to assess the expression of WT1 as previously described (32). The values were calculated as a ratio of PBGD housekeeping gene expression.

Analysis of antigen-specific T cells. Heparinized peripheral blood samples were obtained from each patient and mononuclear cells were isolated by density gradient centrifugation using Ficoll-Hypaque and cryopreserved. Following the thawing of cryopreserved samples and overnight resting, antigen-specific T cells were detected by intracellular cytokine staining after a short time of incubation with WT1 candidate epitopes or irrelevant peptides as described previously (13). For the analysis of cultured T cells, tetramer staining was done due to a high level of unspecific IFNγ production. In brief, PBMC (2 × 106) were incubated with 10 μg/mL of each peptide. After 1 hour, 20 μg/mL of brefeldin A (Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany) was added, and after an additional 5 hours, PBMC were stained extracellularly with fluorescence-conjugated monoclonal antibodies against CD8, CD3, and intracellularly with IFNγ fluorescence-conjugated monoclonal antibody (BD Bioscience, Heidelberg, Germany). Data acquisition was done on a FACSCalibur cytometer and analyzed using CellQuest Software (BD Bioscience). A T cell response was considered positive if the frequency of CD3+CD8+ T cells producing IFNγ in response to the candidate epitope was at least 2-fold higher compared with an irrelevant peptide, and if there was a minimum of 0.05% of IFNγ+CD3+CD8+ T cells after the subtraction of the irrelevant peptide background response.

For tetramer analyses, APC-labeled HLA-A*01 WT1.317-327 tetrameric complexes were synthesized essentially as described (33). In order to reduce background by avoiding unspecific binding to CD8, tetramers with the mutation A245V in the HLA α-chain were used (34). Staining was done for 15 minutes at room temperature in the dark following a washing step with extracellular staining using antibodies against CD3 (PerCP), CD8 (FITC), CD4 (PE), CD13 (PE), and CD19 (PE). PE-labeled lineage markers were used for “trash” staining to exclude cells with unspecific tetramer-binding.

Proteasomal processing. Purification of 20S proteasomes, in vitro degradation of the precursor peptide, WT1.313-336, and separation and analysis of cleavage products were done as described (35). In brief, proteasomes were isolated from the EBV-transformed B cell line, LCL-721.174 (constitutive proteasome), and the parental cell line, LCL-721 (immunoproteasome; ref. 35). WT1.313-336 (10 nmol/L, 27.6 μg) was incubated for 6 hours with 2 μg of immunoproteasome or with 2 μg of constitutive proteasome, respectively, in digestion buffer [20 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 10 mmol/L NaCl, 10 mmol/L KCl, 2 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.5 mmol/L DTT] and the reaction was stopped by freezing the reaction mixture at −80°C. A combination of Edman sequencing and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry was subsequently done to determine the identity and quantity of peptides generated after proteasome digestion.

Generation of WT1.317-327–specific T cells. Unfractionated or CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cell–depleted PBMC from two patients with HLA-A*01–positive melanoma were used for the generation of WT1.317-327–specific T cells. CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells were depleted from PBMC prior to T cell culture using the CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cell isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch-Gladbach, Germany), and used according to the manufacturer's instructions. CD4+ cells were separated with a biotinylated non–CD4 cell antibody cocktail. Following positive selection of CD4+CD25+ with CD25 MicroBeads, the CD4− fraction and the CD4+CD25− population were cocultured in the presence of 10 μg/mL of WT1.317-327 peptide or HLA-A*01–binding HIV.70-78 peptide as a negative control in complete medium supplemented with 10 IU/mL of interleukin 2 (IL-2; Chiron, Munich, Germany) and 5 ng/mL of IL-7 (R&D systems). Cells were plated in a 96-well U-bottomed plate (Costar/Corning, New York, NY) and placed in an incubator with 5% CO2 and humidified atmosphere. Restimulation was done after 10 days with irradiated autologous PBMC pulsed with WT1.317-327 peptide in the presence of β2-microglobulin in a ratio of 5:1 CTL to autologous irradiated feeder cells. Every other day, IL-2 was added at 10 IU/mL.

51Chromium release assay. The standard 51chromium release assay was done as described previously (36). Target cells were labeled for 1 hour with 100 μCi 51chromium-sodium (Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom) for 1 hour at 37°C and 5% CO2. Labeled target cells (1 × 103 in 50 μL) were then added to effector cells (100 μL) at the indicated E/T ratios in V-bottomed microwells. The antigen specificity of tumor cell lysis was further assessed in a cold target inhibition assay by analyzing the capacity of unlabeled (cold) autologous PBMC pulsed with WT1.317-327 peptide to block the lysis of labeled (hot) WT1-expressing tumor cell line, UKBF-11. Chromium release was measured in the supernatant harvested after 4 hours of incubation at 37°C. The percentage of specific lysis was calculated as 100 × [(experimental − spontaneous release) / (total − spontaneous release)].

Results

Predicted HLA-A*01–binding peptides. Prediction of candidate 9-mer and 10-mer epitopes according to the HLA-A*01 motif from WT1 (Swiss Prot accession no. P19544) was done using the SYFPEITHI algorithm and 11- to 13-mer candidate epitopes were calculated according to the same prediction model as previously described (31). Using this approach, five peptides were selected as candidate T cell epitopes including one 11-mer (WT1.317-327; TSEKRPFMCAY), two 12-mer (WT1.37-48, VLDFAPPGASAY; WT1.260-271, WTEGQSNHSTGY), and two 13-mer (WT1.137-149, CLESQPAIRNQGY; WT1.188-200, LGEQQYSVPPPVY) peptides.

Screening of T cell reactivity to predicted epitopes in patients. Using functional flow cytometry detecting peptide-induced induction of intracellular IFNγ, peripheral blood T cells from HLA-A*01 patients were analyzed ex vivo for recognition of the five WT1 candidate epitopes. This patient group included 8 patients with myeloid leukemia and 6 patients with other hematologic malignancies, of whom 10 had received allogeneic stem cell transplantation. In addition to patients with HLA-A*01, we also included two patients expressing HLA-A*26, which had been grouped into the HLA-A*01 family due to very similar peptide specificity (37). No or less than 0.4% of CD3+CD8+ T cells (median 0.07%) produced IFNγ in the presence of an irrelevant HIV peptide. As shown in Fig. 1A , the candidate epitope WT1.317-327 showed high immunogenicity as >2-fold higher frequencies of T cells secreting IFNγ in response to this peptide were detected in 5 of 14 patients ex vivo. Following subtraction of the percentages of IFNγ+ CD3+CD8+ T cells in response to the HIV peptide, the calculated frequencies of WT1.317-327–reactive T cells were 1.5%, 0.8%, 0.6%, 0.6%, and 0.4% of CD3+CD8+ T cells, respectively. Figure 1B shows a representative dot blot of the T cell response to WT1.317-327 in a patients' sample detected by both intracellular IFNγ and tetramer staining. In addition, low-frequency T cell responses (0.24%, 0.27%, and 0.47% of CD3+CD8+ T cells) were seen in three patients against a minipool of WT1.188-200 and WT1.37-48. In contrast, no T cell response to WT1 epitopes was observed in 11 HLA-A*01–positive healthy subjects (Fig. 1A).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Flow cytometric analysis of ex vivo T cell responses to HLA-A*01–binding candidate epitopes from WT1 in 14 patients with hematologic malignancies and 11 healthy subjects. A, the frequencies of antigen-specific T cells were detected by intracellular IFNγ staining of CD3+CD8+ T cells after 18 hours of coincubation with the five WT1 peptides and an irrelevant HLA-A*01–binding peptide as negative control (HIV). Five of 14 patients showed a T cell response to WT1.317-327, whereas in 11 healthy subjects, no response to either of the five candidate WT1 peptides was observed. Due to the paucity of samples, T cell responses were tested against minipools consisting of WT1.37-48 + WT1.188-200, and WT1.137-149 + WT1.260-271, respectively. B, example of the T cell response analysis against WT1.317-327 in one HLA-A*01–positive patient using intracellular IFNγ and A*01/WT1.317-327 tetramer staining. The CD8/IFNγ profile of CD3-gated lymphocytes in PBMC in response to an HLA-A*01–binding HIV peptide (left), and to WT1.317-327 (middle). Tetramer staining of CD3-gated T cells (right).

In vitro proteasome digestion of WT1.313-336. A crucial prerequisite for a peptide to be presented as a T cell epitope is its proper excision from the protein. To confirm the processing of WT1.317-327 as suggested by the T cell studies, we analyzed in vitro digestion of the 24-mer WT1-derived peptide 313-336 encompassing the WT1.317-327 peptide by constitutive as well as immunoproteasomes (Fig. 2 ). The COOH-terminal residue Tyr327 (Y) was generated by the immunoproteasome as the major cleavage event (313-327). The complementary fragment 328-336 represented the other major fragment in this digest. No processing of the NH2 terminus was observed in the immunoproteasome digest. This finding is not unexpected as immunoproteasomes most frequently produce an NH2-terminally extended precursor, which is trimmed to its final length by aminopeptidases (38). Using constitutive proteasomes, a cleavage site COOH-terminal to Tyr327 (Y) was also shown because the 328-336 fragment was efficiently generated. We failed, however, to detect the complementary fragment x-327, which most likely resulted from the formation of cysteine bridging. Because WT1.313-336 contains two cysteines at positions 325 and 330, which frequently results in disulfide bridging during high-performance liquid chromatography separation, an unequivocal assignment of each signal in the mass spectra to a peptide fragment was not possible. In the constitutive proteasome digest, a fragment was also found sharing the NH2 terminus Thr317 (T) of the WT1.317-327 peptide.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Proteasome-mediated digestion of the precursor peptide WT1.313-336. In vitro digestion of 24-mer peptide WT1.313-336 encompassing the WT1.317-327 epitope, TSEKRPFMCAY, by constitutive as well as immunoproteasome digests was analyzed. First column, the amount of fragments detected. The NH2-terminally extended precursor peptide 313-327 was found as the major fragment in the immunoproteasome digest. Detection of fragments WT1.328-336 and WT1.317-323… in the constitutive digest also suggests the cleavage of the epitope WT1.317-327. The COOH-terminally cleaved peptide 317-327 could not be detected, most likely due to cysteine bridging.

WT1.317-327–specific CTL could rapidly be generated from regulatory T cell–depleted PBMC and efficiently lyse HLA-A*01–positive WT1 expressing autologous tumor cells. To verify recognition of the naturally processed WT1.317-327 epitope, specific T cells were generated. In the first set of experiments, we failed to expand WT1.317-327–reactive T cells from unfractionated PBMC from a total of eight HLA-A*01–positive patients following 14 days of in vitro stimulation in the presence of WT1.317-327 peptide, IL-2 and IL-7. As it has been previously shown by other groups that regulatory T cells prevent in vitro expansion of tumor-reactive T cells (39), we next did WT1.317-327–specific CTL generation following the depletion of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. As shown in Fig. 3A , stimulation of regulatory T cell–depleted PBMC from a patient with HLA-A*01–positive melanoma with WT1.317-327 peptide, IL-2, and IL-7 resulted in the induction of 26.5% of WT1.317-327-tetramer+ T cells after 14 days. Without regulatory T cell depletion, no WT1.317-327-tetramer+ T cells could be generated from PBMC. In a second experiment done in this patient, 29.3% of WT1.317-327-tetramer+ T cells could be generated from regulatory T cell–depleted PBMC whereas <3% were found in unfractionated PBMC after 14 days of culture (data not shown). In another patient 7.7% of WT1.317-327-tetramer+ T cells were generated by the stimulation of regulatory T cell–depleted PBMC (Fig. 3B). In this patient, an autologous HLA-A*01–positive melanoma cell line, UKBF-11, with high WT1 expression was available. In a 51chromium release assay WT1.317-327–specific CTL efficiently recognized the autologous HLA-A*01+WT1+ tumor cell line, UKBF-11 (Fig. 3C). Autologous CTL stimulated under the same conditions but in the absence of WT1 peptide (“control CTL”; Fig. 3B, left dot plot) did not lyse UKBF-11; giving evidence for the WT1-specific lysis of UKBF-11 by the autologous WT1-specific CTL line. Further WT1-specific CTL did not lyse the allogeneic HLA class I–positive, but HLA-A*01–negative leukemia cell line TF-1 expressing similar levels of WT1 demonstrating that the presentation of WT1.317-327 peptide in the context of HLA-A*01 is necessary for the recognition of target cells. To further analyze the specificity of the WT1-specific CTL, we did cold-target inhibition assays (Fig. 3D). The lysis of UKBF-11 could be inhibited by the addition of unlabeled WT1 peptide–loaded autologous PBMC (cold target) but not by HIV peptide–loaded PBMC.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

WT1.317-327–specific CTL can be generated in vitro from PBMC after CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cell depletion and efficiently lyse HLA-A*01–positive WT1 expressing autologous tumor cells. A, in the PBMC of a patient with melanoma depleted of CD4+CD25+, regulatory T cell stimulation with peptide WT1.317-327, IL-2, and IL-7 resulted in the in vitro generation of 26.54% of WT1.317-327-tetramer+ T cells after 14 days (right), whereas no detectable WT1.317-327–specific T cells were obtained from unfractionated PBMC (left). B, in a another patient with melanoma, 7.7% WT1.317-327-tetramer+ T cells were generated in a regulatory T cell–depleted culture in the presence of WT1.317-327 (right) but not when incubated under the same conditions but without WT1 peptide (left). C, from the patient in (B), the autologous melanoma cell line UKBF-11 were used as target cells in a standard 51chromium release assay (♦). WT1.317-327–specific CTL efficiently lyse HLA-A*01–positive WT1 expressing autologous tumor cells, but not the HLA-A*01–negative WT1 expressing acute myeloid leukemia line TF-1 (*). Stimulated control PBMC (B, left) did not lyse the autologous tumor cells, confirming the specificity of the T cell recognition (◊). Points, mean of triplicate values; bars, SE; one out of three experiments with concordant results. D, a cold target inhibition assay was done to further assess the specificity of the autologous WT1-specific CTL. The lysis of UKBF-11 could be inhibited by the addition of unlabeled WT1 peptide–loaded autologous PBMC (cold target) but not by HIV peptide–loaded PBMC. 51Chromium-labeled WT1 peptide loaded autologous PBMC (hot) but not HIV peptide–loaded PBMC were lysed by WT1-specific CTL.

Spontaneous T cell responses against WT1.317-327 in patients with solid malignancies. We next tried to detect ex vivo functional T cell responses in four HLA-A*01 patients with lung cancer and the two patients with melanoma. In two of these six patients, T cells specifically secreting IFNγ in response to WT1.317-327 with frequencies of 0.3% and 0.5% of CD3+CD8+ T cells were observed ex vivo (Fig. 4 ).

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

WT1.317-327–reactive T cells in the peripheral blood of patients with lung cancer and melanoma could be detected ex vivo by intracellular cytokine staining. The CD8/IFNγ profile of CD3-gated lymphocytes is shown in the PBMC of a patient with non–small cell lung cancer (A) and in a patient with melanoma (B), coincubated with irrelevant peptide (left) or WT1.317-327 peptide (right).

Discussion

The search for new T cell epitopes in known tumor antigens using the classical reverse immunology strategy has led to the identification of numerous T cell epitopes, most of them restricted to HLA-A*0201, but this approach has the disadvantage of laborious CTL generation against multiple peptides (40). In this study, we show the feasibility of a modified reverse immunology strategy to more rapidly identify epitopes combining epitope prediction, ex vivo screening for the recognition of candidate epitopes by T cells from patients with spontaneous immune responses, proteasomal digestion pattern analysis to show epitope processing, and the generation of epitope-specific CTL from regulatory T cell–depleted PBMC. Using this procedure, we could identify a first HLA-A*01–binding epitope from the tumor antigen WT1, i.e., WT1.317-327.

Using the prediction model, SYFPEITHI, various epitopes, mostly restricted to HLA-A*0201, could be identified (41–43). However, the SYFPEITHI epitope prediction algorithm, as well as the other available databases for epitope prediction, can only indicate candidate epitopes with a certain likelihood to represent naturally processed epitopes. In order to improve the likelihood of predicting epitopes, we screened candidate epitopes for recognition by T cells from patients likely to display spontaneous immune responses. One of the five candidate epitopes, i.e., WT1.317-327, showed high spontaneous immunogenicity as it was recognized by 5 of 14 patients with hematologic malignancies. To show natural processing of the identified peptide, WT1.317-327, we analyzed the proteasomal cleavage of a precursor peptide. Proteasomal digestion of precursor epitopes has already been used successfully in previous studies to identify HLA-A*0201–restricted epitopes from the tumor antigens PRAME and SSX2 (27, 44). Peptides presented on MHC class I molecules are predominantly generated by proteasomal digestion. The majority of mammalian cells contain constitutive proteasomes, whereas professional antigen-presenting cells or cells exposed to IFNγ express immunoproteasomes, which have different catalytic subunits resulting in a reduced production of several peptide tumor antigens (45, 46). The constitutive proteasome is able to generate both termini of an epitope, whereas the immunoproteasome mostly produces an NH2-terminally extended precursor (27, 28, 47). NH2-termini are subsequently trimmed to their final length by aminopeptidases in the cytoplasm or endoplasmatic reticulum (47). In accordance with these findings, our study shows the generation of a NH2-terminally extended precursor peptide WT1.313-327 by the immunoproteasome. Although we failed to show the processing of peptide WT1.317-327 by the constitutive proteasome, we observed the cleavage of both COOH- and NH2-terminal amino acids of WT1.317-327, suggesting that the peptide WT1.317-327 could also be generated by the constitutive proteasome. The failure to show peptide WT1.317-327 in our study most likely results from disulfide bridging as the peptide contains cysteine.

Finally, we showed that WT1.317-327 CTL with sufficient avidity to efficiently kill autologous WT1 expressing HLA-A*01+ tumor cells could be generated from the peripheral blood of patients with melanoma. In accordance with recent studies of NY-ESO-specific CD4+T cell responses in cancer patients (39, 48), WT1-specific T cells could only be generated following the depletion of regulatory T cells, suggesting that the WT1-expressing tumor induced a WT1-specific effector T cell response, which was inhibited by regulatory T cells. Furthermore, in a patient with melanoma and in a patient with lung cancer, we were able to detect ex vivo functional WT1.317-327–specific T cells. This observation is, to our knowledge, the first demonstration of spontaneous WT1-specific T cell responses in the peripheral blood of patients with solid malignancies. In two other studies, specific T cells against HLA-A*0201–binding WT1 epitopes could be expanded from the peripheral blood of patients with colorectal cancer and from the lymph nodes of patients with breast cancer (6, 49).

In summary, the strategy selected for epitope identification in this study was shown to be a reliable approach for identifying an immunogenic T cell epitope from the tumor antigen WT1. Such epitopes are of great interest for the analysis of T cell responses in tumor patients. Importantly, this epitope broadens the applicability of WT1-based treatment strategies.

Footnotes

  • Grant support: José Carreras Leukemia Foundation.

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • Received June 1, 2006.
  • Revision received August 20, 2006.
  • Accepted August 28, 2006.

References

  1. ↵
    Keilholz U, Menssen HD, Gaiger A, et al. Wilms' tumour gene 1 (WT1) in human neoplasia. Leukemia 2005;19:1318–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Inoue K, Ogawa H, Sonoda Y, et al. Aberrant overexpression of the Wilms tumor gene (WT1) in human leukemia. Blood 1997;89:1405–12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. Loeb DM, Evron E, Patel CB, et al. Wilms' tumor suppressor gene (WT1) is expressed in primary breast tumors despite tumor-specific promoter methylation. Cancer Res 2001;61:921–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. Azuma T, Otsuki T, Kuzushima K, Froelich CJ, Fujita S, Yasukawa M. Myeloma cells are highly sensitive to the granule exocytosis pathway mediated by WT1-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:7402–12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. Oji Y, Miyoshi S, Maeda H, et al. Overexpression of the Wilms' tumor gene WT1 in de novo lung cancers. Int J Cancer 2002;100:297–303.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Koesters R, Linnebacher M, Coy JF, et al. WT1 is a tumor-associated antigen in colon cancer that can be recognized by in vitro stimulated cytotoxic T cells. Int J Cancer 2004;109:385–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Nakatsuka SI, Oji Y, Horiuchi T, et al. Immunohistochemical detection of WT1 protein in a variety of cancer cells. Mod Pathol 2006;19:804–14.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    Algar EM, Khromykh T, Smith SI, Blackburn DM, Bryson GJ, Smith PJ. A WT1 antisense oligonucleotide inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis in myeloid leukaemia cell lines. Oncogene 1996;12:1005–14.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    Oji Y, Ogawa H, Tamaki H, et al. Expression of the Wilms' tumor gene WT1 in solid tumors and its involvement in tumor cell growth. Jpn J Cancer Res 1999;90:194–204.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    Gao L, Bellantuono I, Elsasser A, et al. Selective elimination of leukemic CD34(+) progenitor cells by cytotoxic T lymphocytes specific for WT1. Blood 2000;95:2198–203.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Tsuboi A, Oka Y, Udaka K, et al. Enhanced induction of human WT1-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes with a 9-mer WT1 peptide modified at HLA-A*2402-binding residues. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2002;51:614–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Gaiger A, Reese V, Disis ML, Cheever MA. Immunity to WT1 in the animal model and in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2000;96:1480–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Scheibenbogen C, Letsch A, Thiel E, et al. CD8 T-cell responses to Wilms tumor gene product WT1 and proteinase 3 in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2002;100:2132–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. Elisseeva OA, Oka Y, Tsuboi A, et al. Humoral immune responses against Wilms tumor gene WT1 product in patients with hematopoietic malignancies. Blood 2002;99:3272–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. Gentilini C, Hilbers U, Ganepola S, et al. WT1-specific T cell responses are frequent after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute and chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 2005;106:2906.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    Rezvani K, Grube M, Brenchley JM, et al. Functional leukemia-associated antigen-specific memory CD8+ T cells exist in healthy individuals and in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia before and after stem cell transplantation. Blood 2003;102:2892–900.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Mailander V, Scheibenbogen C, Thiel E, Letsch A, Blau IW, Keilholz U. Complete remission in a patient with recurrent acute myeloid leukemia induced by vaccination with WT1 peptide in the absence of hematological or renal toxicity. Leukemia 2004;18:165–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Oka Y, Tsuboi A, Taguchi T, et al. Kawakami M lymphocytes by WT1 peptide vaccine and the resultant cancer regression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004;101:13885–90.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Bellantuono I, Gao L, Parry S, et al. Two distinct HLA-A*0201-presented epitopes of the Wilms tumor antigen 1 can function as targets for leukemia-reactive CTL. Blood 2002;100:3835–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. Oka Y, Elisseeva OA, Tsuboi A, et al. Human cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses specific for peptides of the wild-type Wilms' tumor gene (WT1) product. Immunogenetics 2000;51:99–107.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Azuma T, Makita M, Ninomiya K, et al. Identification of a novel WT1-derived peptide which induces human leucocyte antigen-A24-restricted anti-leukaemia cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Br J Haematol 2002;116:601–3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Boon T, Old LJ. Cancer tumor antigens. Curr Opin Immunol 1997;9:681–3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Scheibenbogen C, Sun Y, Keilholz U, et al. Identification of known and novel immunogenic T-cell epitopes from tumor antigens recognized by peripheral blood T cells from patients responding to IL-2-based treatment. Int J Cancer 2002;98:409–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. Hebart H, Daginik S, Stevanovic S, et al. Sensitive detection of human cytomegalovirus peptide-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses by interferon-γ-enzyme-linked immunospot assay and flow cytometry in healthy individuals and in patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Blood 2002;99:3830–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. Reynolds SR, Celis E, Sette A, et al. Identification of HLA-A*03, A*11 and B*07-restricted melanoma-associated peptides that are immunogenic in vivo by vaccine-induced immune response (VIIR) analysis. J Immunol Methods 2000;244:59–67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Ghei M, Stroncek DF, Provenzano M. Analysis of memory T lymphocyte activity following stimulation with overlapping HLA-A*2402, A*0101 and Cw*0402 restricted CMV pp65 peptides. J Transl Med 2005;3:23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Kessler JH, Beekman NJ, Bres-Vloemans SA, et al. Efficient identification of novel HLA-A*0201-presented cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitopes in the widely expressed tumor antigen PRAME by proteasome-mediated digestion analysis. J Exp Med 2001;193:73–88.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Lucchiari-Hartz M, van Endert PM, Lauvau G, et al. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitopes o HIV-1 Nef: generation of multiple definitive major histocompatibility complex class I ligands by proteasomes. J Exp Med 2000;191:239–52.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Baur MP, Neugebauer M, Albert ED. Reference tables of two-locus haplotype frequencies for all MHC marker loci. In: Albert, et al., editor. Histocompatibility testing. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg; 1984. p. 677–81.
  30. ↵
    Valmori D, Scheibenbogen C, Dutoit V, et al. Circulating tumor-reactive CD8(+) T cells in melanoma patients contain a CD45RA(+)CCR7(−) effector subset exerting ex vivo tumor-specific cytolytic activity. Cancer Res 2002;62:1743–50.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Rammensee H, Bachmann J, Emmerich NP, Bachor OA, Stevanovic S. SYFPEITHI: database for MHC ligands and peptide motifs. Immunogenetics 1999;50:213–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Siehl JM, Reinwald M, Heufelder K, Menssen HD, Keilholz U, Thiel E. Expression of Wilms' tumor gene 1 at different stages of acute myeloid leukemia and analysis of its major splice variants. Ann Hematol 2004;83:745–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Moris A, Teichgräber V, Gauthier L, Bühring HJ, Rammensee HG. Cutting edge: characterization of allorestricted and peptide-selective alloreactive T cells using HLA-tetramer selection. J Immunol 2001;166:4818–21.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    Bodinier M, Peyrat MA, Tournay C, et al. Efficient detection and immunomagnetic sorting of specific T cells using multimers of MHC class I and peptide with reduced CD8 binding. Nat Med 2000;6:707–10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    Tenzer S, Stoltze L, Schonfisch B, et al. Quantitative analysis of prion-protein degradation by constitutive and immuno-20S proteasomes indicates differences correlated with disease susceptibility. J Immunol 2004;172:1083–91.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    Scheibenbogen C, Romero P, Rivoltini L, et al. Quantitation of antigen-reactive T cells in peripheral blood by IFNγ-ELISPOT assay and chromium-release assay: a four-centre comparative trial. J Immunol Methods 2000;244:81–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    Sette A, Sidney J. Nine major HLA class I supertypes account for the vast preponderance of HLA-A and -B polymorphism. Immunogenetics 1999;50:201–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    Mo XY, Cascio P, Lemerise K, Goldberg AL, Rock K. Distinct proteolytic processes generate the C and N termini of MHC class I-binding peptides. J Immunol 1999;163:5851–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    Nishikawa H, Jager E, Ritter G, Old LJ, Gnjatic S. CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells control the induction of antigen-specific CD4+ helper T cell responses in cancer patients. Blood 2005;106:1008–11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    Coulie PG. Human tumour antigens recognized by T cells: new perspectives for anti-cancer vaccines? Mol Med Today 1997;3:261–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Sun Y, Stevanovic S, Song M, et al. The kinase insert domain-containing receptor is an angiogenesis-associated antigen recognized by human cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Blood 2006;107:1476–83.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. Neumann F, Wagner C, Preuss KD, et al. Identification of an epitope derived from the cancer testis antigen HOM-TES-14/SCP1 and presented by dendritic cells to circulating CD4+ T cells. Blood 2005;106:3105–13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    Kruger T, Schoor O, Lemmel C, et al. Lessons to be learned from primary renal cell carcinomas: novel tumor antigens and HLA ligands for immunotherapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2005;54:826–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    Ayyoub M, Stevanovic S, Sahin U, et al. Proteasome-assisted identification of a SSX-2-derived epitope recognized by tumor-reactive CTL infiltrating metastatic melanoma. J Immunol 2002;168:1717–22.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    Morel S, Levy F, Burlet-Schiltz O, et al. Processing of some antigens by the standard proteasome but not by the immunoproteasome results in poor presentation by dendritic cells. Immunity 2000;12:107–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    Van den Eynde BJ, Morel S. Differential processing of class-I-restricted epitopes by the standard proteasome and the immunoproteasome. Curr Opin Immunol 2001;13:147–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    Snyder HL, Yewdell JW, Bennink JR. Trimming of antigenic peptides in an early secretory compartment. J Exp Med 1994;180:2389–94.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    Nishikawa H, Qian F, Tsuji T, et al. Influence of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells on low/high-avidity CD4+ T cells following peptide vaccination. J Immunol 2006;176:6340–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    Gillmore R, Xue SA, Holler A, et al. Detection of Wilms' tumor antigen-specific CTL in tumor-draining lymph nodes of patients with early breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:34–42.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Clinical Cancer Research: 12 (24)
December 2006
Volume 12, Issue 24
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Clinical Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Identification of a Highly Immunogenic HLA-A*01-Binding T Cell Epitope of WT1
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Identification of a Highly Immunogenic HLA-A*01-Binding T Cell Epitope of WT1
Anne Marie Asemissen, Ulrich Keilholz, Stefan Tenzer, Margret Müller, Steffen Walter, Stefan Stevanovic, Hansjörg Schild, Anne Letsch, Eckhard Thiel, Hans-Georg Rammensee and Carmen Scheibenbogen
Clin Cancer Res December 15 2006 (12) (24) 7476-7482; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1337

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Identification of a Highly Immunogenic HLA-A*01-Binding T Cell Epitope of WT1
Anne Marie Asemissen, Ulrich Keilholz, Stefan Tenzer, Margret Müller, Steffen Walter, Stefan Stevanovic, Hansjörg Schild, Anne Letsch, Eckhard Thiel, Hans-Georg Rammensee and Carmen Scheibenbogen
Clin Cancer Res December 15 2006 (12) (24) 7476-7482; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1337
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Survivin mAbs Inhibit Tumor Growth
  • B7-H3 Negatively Modulates Cancer Immunity
  • RB1 and TYMP as Biomarkers of Capecitabine Response in TNBC
Show more Cancer Therapy: Preclinical
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • CCR Focus Archive
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Clinical Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Clinical Cancer Research
eISSN: 1557-3265
ISSN: 1078-0432

Advertisement